YEAR(S) IN REVIEW: Worst Journalist, News Org of 2016!

TUESDAY, DECEMBER 20, 2016

Part 2—Their horrible work stood out:
In the end, the decisions were fairly easy.

In the beginning, a sensible person could have seen this year's horrible end.

Our award-winning "Year(s) in Review" panel of judges has named Rachel Maddow as the worst journalist of 2016. They've also selected the New York Times as the worst news org.

In the end, routinely horrible work led to these decisions. In each case, though, the worst journalistic work of 2016 may have occurred last year!

Let's start with Maddow, a unanimous choice for Worst Journalist of 2016.

The judges awarded Maddow for a long list of offenses. For starters, they noted her constant mugging and clowning, mixed with her potent self-adoration. "Only Trump matches her absurd self-regard," one of the judges said.

The judges noted Maddow's willingness to politicize important substantive matters. Most of all, they hailed her as a skillful dodger. They cited her skill at presenting herself as a fiery liberal while taking a dive on the issues which decided the 2016 presidential campaign—and while cashing large corporate checks.

In the judges' formal citation, Maddow was hailed for "a skillful, persistent con." Still, in the beginning was the end! Paradoxically, the judges cited some of Maddow's work from 2015 as some of the current year's worst.

Regarding her work from 2015, the judges cited her ludicrous "thirteen weeks," the period she devoted to nightly ranting about the way the Fox News Channel was planning to stage the first Republican debate. Here's how that went down:

Confronted with seventeen certified Republican candidates, Fox News announced that it would include only ten candidates in its first debate. CNN announced a similar plan for the second debate.

Confronted with these unremarkable decisions, Maddow swung into action. With an 18-month pseudo-campaign beginning, MSNBC was rebranding itself as "the place for politics." Maddow jumped in with a substantively ludicrous, tribally pleasing, 13-week attack on Fox News.

Psychiatrists continue to debate a basic question: Could Maddow possibly have been sincere in her nightly keening and wailing about the way the lineup for the first debate would be chosen? Or was this simply a con?

It's hard to know how to answer that question. But Maddow shrieked about Fox for a full thirteen weeks, rarely mentioning the fact that CNN was going to limit participation in the same way. In this manner, the judges have found, Maddow signaled that her election coverage would be fake, faux and phony throughout.

(The judges also called attention to Maddow's reactions when Donald J. Trump announced his decision to seek the White House in June 2015. She said she had no personal beef with the self-made Birther King; chuckled and clowned in the immediate wake of his announcement; and barely mentioned his "rapist" announcement speech until several weeks had passed and tribal opinion was clear. In this beginning, the judges found markers of the end; Maddow's coverage of Campaign 2016 would be a con throughout.)

As for Maddow's work in this calendar year, the judges were unanimous. Her refusal to discuss the "emailgate" matter turned out to be the defining mark of her year. The strategic silence she maintained echoed her silence in 2012, when the Benghazi scripts were being invented. The judges were unanimous in their assessment of these twin refusals to speak:

Maddow was protecting her career through lengthy, elaborate silence. Here's how it happened this year:

On July 5, 2016, FBI kingpin James B. Comey interjected himself into the White House campaign. Comey is widely known as Comey the God; he's a very powerful insider establishment figure.

Presumably for that reason, Maddow never mentioned Comey's name until late in October, when he struck again. But then, back in the beginning, the judges had seen this end. All through the fall of 2012, Maddow never mentioned the name of Susan Rice as she was pilloried and left for dead in the wake of the Benghazi attacks.

First Benghazi, then the emails! In each case, Maddow maintained total silence as the scripts which would defeat Candidate Clinton hardened, then turned to stone.

Clinton was pilloried for her email practices over the last twenty months of the 2016 campaign. Maddow was scrupulous about maintaining a self-protective silence. The judges were especially amused by her report on May 25 of this year, when she pretended to respond to a damaging State Department report.

Adopting her typical "here look me over" approach, Maddow mugged and clowned with large stacks of paper, complaining about the way the State Department's emails are archived. As she clowned in these familiar ways, she transplendently failed to address that actual claims at issue, while giving gullible viewers the impression that she had.

(Is it possible that Maddow is really that dumb? The judges have ruled that she isn't.)

On a corporate branding basis, Maddow was sold to the liberal public as "their own Rhodes Scholar." The judges were unanimous—she stood out in the past several years for her refusal to put her intellectual skills to actual use.

In an appendix to their report, the judges noted another beginning which suggested this end. This too involved Maddow's relentless branding.

The judges recalled the way Maddow originally defined herself as "the TV star who didn't own a TV (not that she was saying that she was smarter than you are)." This branding was everywhere when Maddow burst upon the scene. It aligned her with other branded NBC stars, such as the kid from New Jersey who loves Nascar and the working-class kid from Buffalo whose Dad rode a garbage truck.

A few years later, the news finally broke—Maddow had bought a TV set! She earned "special demerit" in the judges' eyes for a ridiculous story she told at least one profile writer—her claim that she and Susan had purchased the TV set on-line when they were drunk one night. She claimed they were surprised to wake up the next day and find evidence of their on-line purchase scattered about in the bed.

In this bizarre beginning, we should all have seen this year's gruesome end, the judges have now reported. (To see Maddow's current TV room, you can just click here.)

Maddow was an easy pick for Worst Journalist of 2016. Similarly, the New York Times was a runaway winner of the Worst News Org award.

Here too, the judges ruled that the Times' worst work of 2016 was done in earlier years. In the case of the Times, the horrible work extended all the way back to the paper's bungled Whitewater reports—work which began in 1992!

In that horrible beginning, we had this year's end! Within the past two years, the judges pointed to a string of front-page reports by what they called "this most foppish of all major American news orgs."

They cited last year's hapless, sprawling front-page report about the scary uranium deal. They cited this year's Sunday front-page report about Beau Biden's use of his last few nouns.

They cited the newspaper's refusal to challenge Donald J. Trump's ugly birtherism, even in a Sunday morning front-page report on the topic in July of this year. They cited the front-page report in early October which sought to rehabilitate the credibility of three truth-challenged Clinton sex accusers from the distant past.

For their topper, the judges simply linked to this Kevin Drum post. It shows the front page of the New York Times on October 29, the morning after Comey the God intruded on the White House campaign again.

That intrusion was so blatant that even Maddow felt forced to respond! The New York Times chose to fill its front page with the latest collection of gorilla dust. According to the judges, that recent front page tracks to a distant beginning in 1992.

In the beginning was the end! This campaign was decided by a poisonous narrative which started on the Times' front page in early 1992. (More on that "Most Consequential Narrative" to come.) Right to the end, the Times emitted the requisite blather in support of that old story-line. Maddow kept avoiding related topics over the past several years.

In closing, the judges made one final point. The New York Times was awful this year, but liberals could be sure one thing. They could be sure that Rachel Maddow would never tell them that!

Maddow is part of an insider guild that's strongly built around self-interest and self-dealing. According to the panel of judges, speaking truth to and about this institutional power is simply never done.

Her mugging and clowning insult us all. As we liberals praise ourselves for our moral greatness and our intellectual brilliance, we make it clear, night after night, that we like being conned this way.

Tomorrow: Most Consequential Narrative and other related awards

Maddow never ends: Judges noted Maddow's skill at killing time while serving tribal porridge. Several judges noted a November 28 time-killer which started out like this:
MADDOW (11/28/16): Good evening, Chris [Hayes]. Thanks, my friend. And thanks to you at home for joining us this hour.

Sixteen years ago, 16 years ago, this man set a record. He ran for a seat in the United States Senate 16 years ago, and he lost that race, which is why you probably don't recognize him.

But in the course of losing that race that year, he did set a record. And this was the record that he set. He spent more money losing a U.S. Senate race than anyone had ever spent losing a U.S. Senate seat ever before. Whoo!

And his name was Rick Lazio. And the person he lost to in that Senate race in the year 2000 was somebody you will recognize, Hillary Clinton.

2000. That was the first year Hillary Clinton ran for the United States Senate from New York state. She beat Rick Lazio badly. She clobbered him by 12 points.

Over the course of that campaign, he spent himself into oblivion.
He outspent her by a mile. He outspent her by something like—she spent $29 million and he spent $40 million. He ended up millions of dollars in debt and he lost, and he lost by a lot, and he had to give up his day job for all that.

Rick Lazio had been a member of Congress but you can't hold on to a seat in the House while you run for the Senate. So he was like quintuply crushed in that Senate race in 2000.

Well, Hillary Clinton became the United States senator. And then at the end of her first term in the Senate, so six years later, Republicans went up against her again, but they had a hard time getting somebody to run against her...
The bullshit continued from there. This was Maddow's rambling, crowd-pleasing way of discussing one of Donald J. Trump's less consequential nominations to date, that of K. T. McFarland as deputy national security adviser.

Along the way, Maddow pleasured us liberals by ridiculing Lazio; by ridiculing the awful Jeannine Pirro; and by ridiculing a little-known Republican mayor of Yonkers. Eventually, she started ridiculing McFarland herself, in an overtly sexist manner, while placing thumbs on several scales.

That's our Rachel! Even after Hillary Clinton gets beaten by someone she vastly outspent, we get to hear how ridiculous Lazio was, and how badly the marvelous Clinton beat him.

Lazio was "quintuply crushed!" No, it doesn't get dumber than this, but it's like this all the time on this childish program.

(Please note: Maddow loves to show photographs of minor Republicans while chortling about the fact that no one can recognize them. It's a regular part of our porridge.)

By the way, did Clinton "clobber" Lazio "by twelve points" while he "spent himself into oblivion?" Yes, she did, but that wasn't an especially huge win in a blue state like New York. In that same 2000 election, Candidate Gore beat Candidate Bush by twenty-five points across that same state of New York.

There was exactly zero reason to waste time with this silly piddle last month. But that election might have been seen as a harbinger of Clinton's relative weakness as a vote-getter, not as a sign of her overpowering greatness.

Homey doesn't play it that way! Rachel Maddow serves tribal porridge as she jams corporate cash in her pants. For these reasons, she's been named Worst Journalist of the Year(s) by our panel of judges.

31 comments:

  1. Somerby says: "But that election might have been seen as a harbinger of Clinton's relative weakness as a vote-getter, not as a sign of her overpowering greatness."

    Somerby would love to have us think that Clinton lost because she was a bad candidate, but it didn't happen that way. She was attacked from within her own party by Bernie Sanders, who was a rallying point for every Clinton enemy and sexist bro, for every diehard Obamabot and mommy-hater, and whatever Maureen Dowd is.

    Chris Cillizza suggests that Sanders campaign revealed the weakness of Clinton's support among millennials, the lack of enthusiasm for her on the progressive left. I disagree. I believe that Sanders created that weakness by fabricating lies about Clinton's positions and reviving far-right attacks on her. Bernie supporters, especially young ones, lacked the memory cells to recognize the origins of claims that she killed Vince Jordan or that Bill was a serial rapist. They didn't understand that Hillary ran to the left of Obama and that she was more progressive than Bernie in many respects -- and has been her entire career.

    Somerby apparently thinks Maddow should have been pointing out what a weak candidate Clinton would be, as if Maddow didn't aide and abet the NY Times ongoing attacks on Clinton. Perhaps Somerby thinks Sanders would have been our candidate had Maddow done her job right.

    Sanders lost the election for Clinton. Now Somerby lectures us to forgive the Trump voters. I am struggling with how to forgive the Sanders supporters -- people like Somerby, now using distraction to shift the responsibility for defeat off of where it beongs -- on them!

    I am still trying to decide whether I will be back here after the New Year. I am disliking Somerby more every day. I don't want to be one of the detractors here, in one of the few places that permits Disquis-free commenting, but I cannot stomach the self-serving garbage he is dishing out these days.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Of course Clinton was attack during the primary season. That's what the candidate selection process is all about. But, Sanders' attacks were relatively gentle. He didn't focus on the e-mails. Compare that with the harsh criticism Trump received from other Republican candidates, and the harsh criticism they received from Trump.

      Delete
    2. I see what you did there! Turning Somerby's request, that we treat Trump voters with the respect that they have earned by being fellow citizens, into a mandate to forgive them. Sneaky, sneaky. You, their better, can only interpret it as being asked to treat them as sinners, but with a modicum of decorum. Yet, still, you can't bend down that far!

      Delete
    3. @12:20
      I responded to what I heard Somerby say. You are being excessively literal.

      Somerby has asked us to listen to them because they believe they have good reasons for supporting Trump -- no matter how wrongheaded their reasons are. He thinks that is what we need to do to win next time.

      I think Somerby needs to start closer to home and look at what he and other "liberals" did to Clinton during the primaries to see why she lost. Bernie's faint-hearted, coerced support during and up until the Fall election didn't fool any of his own supporters. They saw that he hadn't changed anything and didn't really mean the mealy mouthed things he said.

      It is no coincidence that the lowered turnout was among millennials and those with economic complaints -- the same people who were strongest Bernie voters. Look now how all but one of the 7 electors to revolt were the ones favoring Bernie, despite being pledged to Clinton.

      And now they continue to claim that Bernie would have won! Cannonfire suggested that Bernie's many small donations may have come partially from Russia, not just everyday people, as part of a Roger Stone ratfucking project. When asked, Bernie's response was "so what?" if donations were from Russia. They were for a good cause -- him.

      I believe Somerby is on the wrong track here. He should be examining whether these primary challenges from no-hope candidates actually strengthen a candidate or whether they weaken her by eroding the base. I have always found that strengthening argument to be akin to suggesting that someone can better fight off pneumonia if they suffer strep throat first. Why would anyone ever think that?

      You have deflected from my main argument that Bernie is to blame for Trump's win in order to focus on a trivial point -- whether people should be more respectful of Trump voters.

      Respect is earned where I come from. When I hear Somerby parroting right-wing talking points about identity politics (Us vs The Other, etc.), I lose respect for Somerby too.

      I treat all people with more than a modicum of decorum. I wasn't out there with signs shouting "Lock him up" about Trump or Bernie. Who did that? Who is still doing it?

      Delete
    4. Regarding Bob's statement that "Clinton's relative weakness as a vote-getter," I believe he means that she lacks the personality that Bill had, and that other "vote-getters" have or have had (FDR, Ike, etc.).
      Otherwise I think that you make valid points regarding the Sanders phenomenon, etc., until you characterize Bob's intention as wanting to "forgive the Trump voters." Bob dismisses one tribes penchant to "lecture and educate" the other tribe, rather than to speak with them.

      Delete
    5. When people say that Hillary lacks Bill's "personality" what they really mean is that she lacks a penis. She has plenty of personality -- it is just not the same as a male politican's because women are not permitted to behave the same way as men without being punished for it (e.g., receiving social criticism). Your comment demonstrates the "damned if she does, damned if she doesn't" nature of Hillary's situation. Why not go all the way and tell us you dislike her voice and why does she have to yell so much and why is she always wearing those pant suits and talking about her achievements instead of flirting with the guys in her audience, the way Bill or FDR would have? Why is she leaning over backwards to appear strong and hardy when everyone knows women are frail, weak, sickly (with vague monthly complaints even after menopause) and why is she being accused of taking days off when she spends time with fundraisers instead of doing those huge manly rallies? And what is with her attempts to pretend to be a grandma? Everyone knows that is a fake puton just to get sympathy when the world knows she is a gigantic lesbo! So, yes, I agree that she didn't campaign well as a man, wasn't FDR-ish enough and just didn't put it across that she was a BSD.

      Delete
    6. WOW, Anonymous at 1:32,1:18, 11:57 blaming everybody but HRC. Sad and pathetic. Mr. Sanders did everything he could to help her. HRC made myriad mistakes, she was the captain of her ship-the election outcome is her fault-full stop.

      Delete
    7. " I am struggling with how to forgive the Sanders supporters "

      I suspect you are the person in the comment box who still thinks Clinton really beat Obama in the 2008 primaries.

      Delete
    8. I don't think Somerby is anti-Hillary. He has been pointing out the horrible press coverage of her and Bill since day one of "The Daily Howler", and has pointed out examples of that during this campaign season. Certainly, his point in this installment about Maddow is that she didn't offer clarity or truthful discussion of the email story, but rather let the obfuscation by the press (and Republicans) go unchallenged.

      Delete
    9. anon 11:57 - you seem to have completely missed the boat. TDH was not an avid Sanders supporter. The opposite is more the case. His main point is that the NYT, Rachel Maddow and other msm were unfair to Clinton, rolling over on, or actually advancing, the propaganda about Benghazi, the emails, the Clinton Foundation, etc.

      Delete
    10. Somerby stated several times that he was not a Clinton supporter and that he was inclined to support Sanders. Yes, he was critical of the treatment of both Clintons in the press, but he didn't do anything to help Hillary get elected. He was as likely to say something unfair or snarky about her, as he continues to do.

      Delete
    11. Look, even Gene Lyons noted that Clinton was tone deaf (politically if not financially) in going around giving those 6 figure speeches to groups like Goldman Sachs. But for that, along with 2 dozen other things, she might have prevailed. I think you are oversensitive if you think TDH was snarky toward Clinton. He was more or less apoplectic about Dowd's vileness toward her, attacked the NYT on its treatment of her over and over again.

      Delete
    12. No one considered those speeches any form of corruption except Bernie's campaign and the Republicans. She gave a few speeches while out of office to firms that were part of her constituency, for the same kind of fees anyone of her stature would earn. Some fees were donated to charity. Others were used to pay off those huge debts she and her husband acquired fighting the nuisance lawsuits that continued up to the present. She said nothing scandalous in those speeches.

      ALL out of work politicians give such speeches. None have been criticized except Clinton. Calling this tone deaf ignores the question of how else she might earn enough money to keep her career going. Is it better when a Republican gets a corporate-endowed job at a think tank or joins a few boards of directors at the crony firms that finance their campaigns?

      Children care about this. It wasn't what hurt her, except that it became a campaign slogan in the Bernie camp. A shorthand way of calling "Lock her up" that signified all the unproven corruption for which there was never any evidence.

      I agree that TDH hates Dowd more than Clinton but I have never heard him say anything supportive about her, except that Trump would be worse.

      Calling Clinton tone deaf for doing exactly what all male politicians do, including Bernie (who gave his share of paid speeches to his constituent groups), is majorly unfair.

      Delete
  2. In addition to Maddow's other problems as recited by Bob, every time I hear her or read a transcript from her it sounds like she's deliberately trying to speak at about a second-grade level. Very short sentences, almost a Dr. Seuss-type quality to it.
    I'm not sure why she speaks that way, but I find it off-putting.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Short sentences and much repetition.

      Delete
    2. Just like Trump.

      Delete
    3. On those rare occasions I catch part of the show -- usually one of those will-you-get-to-the-goddam-point openings -- I'm reminded of some goof-off undergrad (OK, me) who has 10 pages to fill for a paper but only about four pages of research. So much of her show is devoted to building false suspense and beating around the bush. "That next after we come back." Worst case of burying leads in all American journalism.

      I thought she was pretty good on Air America in the final days of W., and I believe it was on that basis she was awarded her MSNBC gig. There was a brief period of Maddow-mania, too. She even wrote a book. Now she's established and has settled back to coast on her rep.

      If I had the time to waste, I'd like to revisit some of those old radio shows to remember what it was I liked about her.

      Delete
  3. Maddow doesn't even consider herself a journalist! She said in the Jon Stewart interview that she felt she was more like him. Using humor with the news. That interview is so fascinating because she makes her cluelessness clear even after he tried to spell it out for her in very simple terms. She doesn't even consider what she does journalism! She's a jokey joke fun time gal just like Jon Stewart!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Jon Stewart is a political satirist, not a comedian. Maddow is a clown, just like Somerby says.

      Delete
    2. He calls himself a comedian in he interview.

      Delete
  4. I enjoy watching the butthurt libs on MSNBC and CNN ever since Nov. 8th---it's so indescribably Schadenfreudelicious!! MAGA!!!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I'll bet they are missing you over at the conservative tree house.

      Delete
    2. anon 1:10, yep, life is good. And, as a bonus, America is going to be great again.

      Delete
  5. How to get your Ex Boyfriend back after a breakup, I’m extremely happy that me and my ex-boyfriend are living together again.
    I' m Mary from England, My boyfriend of a 4yr just broke up with me and am 30 weeks pregnant.I have cried my self to sleep most of the nights and don’t seem to concentrate during lectures sometimes I stay awake almost all night thinking about him and start to cry all over again.Because of this I end up not having energy for my next day’s classes ,my attendance has dropped and am always in uni and on time. Generally he is a very nice guy ,he ended it because he said we were arguing a lot and not getting along.He is right we’ve been arguing during the pregnancy a lot .After the break up I kept ringing him and telling him I will change.I am in love with this guy and he is the best guy I have ever been with.I’m still hurt and in disbelief when he said he didn’t have any romantic feelings towards me anymore that hurt me faster than a lethal syringe.He texts me now and then mainly to check up on how am doing with the pregnancy,he is supportive with it but it’s not fair on me, him texting me as I just want to grieve the pain and not have any stress due to the pregnancy.i was really upset and i needed help, so i searched for help online and I came across a website that suggested that Dr Unity can help solve marital problems, restore broken relationships and so on. So, I felt I should give him a try. I contacted him and he told me what to do and i did it then he did a spell for me. 28 hours later, my bf came to me and apologized for the wrongs he did and promise never to do it again. Ever since then, everything has returned back to normal. I and my bf are living together happily again.. All thanks to Dr Unity. If you have any problem contact Dr.Unity now and i guarantee you that he will help you. Here’s his contact. Email him at: Unityspelltemple@gmail.com ,
    you can also call him or add him on Whats-app: +2348071622464 ,
    His website: http://unityspelltemple.yolasite.com .

    ReplyDelete
  6. My ex and I were together for 5 years. We lived together and were engaged. We went on a trip with friends and his family and had a nasty fight and broke up. We both moved out of our home and with our parents. We decided to go no contact for a month and 2 weeks in he started dating a girl and took her on a trip to California ( where we’ve gone the last 2 years on my bday) on my birthday weekend! After battling it out thru emails and a few meetings we finally came to see each other all of last week, i love him so much and i was so desperate to have him back coz i new that girl was not the right person for him so i have to save my relationship and reunite with me ex again so i try all i could to bring him back but all to avail i have be in contact with so many spell caster who only too my money and still nothing good work out of it, i ws so confuse and devastated one day trying to search on facebook, i come across a wonderful testimony of a lady on how a spell caster who she contacted also for love spell help her and bring her husband back to her with-in less day 2 days after the spell i was so fill with joy coz this lady meant my day and i regain my hope back so i directly and desperately email http://happyspelltemple.webs.com/ coz i love my ex so much and i want him back all to my self so with-in 5 min,Dr happy email me back with hope and told me that i have found solution in him that i should worried no more so i did all he ask of me and he gave me assured and guarantee that my ex will come back so i believed and was so gifted all to my surprise after the spell my ex call, come to my working beg and apology for his mistake,and he said sorry for the nasty break up that he was inconsiderate of my feelings nt in tend to hurt me. i can testify with the power love spell of Dr happy me and my ex are happily married now thank you Dr i will for ever be grateful to you and keep sharing your testimony if you need help or love spell fine it difficult to get back with your ex, email happylovespell2@gmail.com or call his mobile number on +2348133873774

    ReplyDelete
  7. Hello, I am Theresa Williams After being in relationship with Anderson for years, he broke up with me, I did everything possible to bring him back but all was in vain, I wanted him back so much because of the love I have for him, I begged him with everything, I made promises but he refused. I explained my problem to my friend and she suggested that I should rather contact a spell caster that could help me cast a spell to bring him back but I am the type that never believed in spell, I had no choice than to try it, I mailed the spell caster, and he told me there was no problem that everything will be okay before three days, that my ex will return to me before three days, he cast the spell and surprisingly in the second day, it was around 4pm. My ex called me, I was so surprised, I answered the call and all he said was that he was so sorry for everything that happened that he wanted me to return to him, that he loves me so much. I was so happy and went to him that was how we started living together happily again. Since then, I have made promise that anybody I know that have a relationship problem, I would be of help to such person by referring him or her to the only real and powerful spell caster who helped me with my own problem. email: drogunduspellcaster@gmail.com you can email him if you need his assistance in your relationship or any other Case.

    1) Love Spells
    2) Lost Love Spells
    3) Divorce Spells
    4) Marriage Spells
    5) Binding Spell.
    6) Breakup Spells
    7) Banish a past Lover
    8.) You want to be promoted in your office/ Lottery spell
    9) want to satisfy your lover
    Contact this great man if you are having any problem for a lasting solution
    through drogunduspellcaster@gmail.com

    ReplyDelete
  8. How to get your Ex Boyfriend back after a breakup, I’m extremely happy that me and my ex-boyfriend are living together again.
    I' m Mary from England, My boyfriend of a 4yr just broke up with me and am 30 weeks pregnant.I have cried my self to sleep most of the nights and don’t seem to concentrate during lectures sometimes I stay awake almost all night thinking about him and start to cry all over again.Because of this I end up not having energy for my next day’s classes ,my attendance has dropped and am always in uni and on time. Generally he is a very nice guy ,he ended it because he said we were arguing a lot and not getting along.He is right we’ve been arguing during the pregnancy a lot .After the break up I kept ringing him and telling him I will change.I am in love with this guy and he is the best guy I have ever been with.I’m still hurt and in disbelief when he said he didn’t have any romantic feelings towards me anymore that hurt me faster than a lethal syringe.He texts me now and then mainly to check up on how am doing with the pregnancy,he is supportive with it but it’s not fair on me, him texting me as I just want to grieve the pain and not have any stress due to the pregnancy.i was really upset and i needed help, so i searched for help online and I came across a website that suggested that Dr Unity can help solve marital problems, restore broken relationships and so on. So, I felt I should give him a try. I contacted him and he told me what to do and i did it then he did a spell for me. 28 hours later, my bf came to me and apologized for the wrongs he did and promise never to do it again. Ever since then, everything has returned back to normal. I and my bf are living together happily again.. All thanks to Dr Unity. If you have any problem contact Dr.Unity now and i guarantee you that he will help you. Here’s his contact. Email him at: Unityspelltemple@gmail.com ,you can also call him or add him on Whats-app: +2348071622464 ,His website: http://unityspelltemple.yolasite.com .

    ReplyDelete
  9. My ex-boyfriend is back after a breakup, I’m extremely happy that we are living together again. I' m Mary from England, My boyfriend of 4yr broke up with me and am 30 weeks pregnant. I have cried my self to sleep most of the nights and don’t seem to concentrate during lectures sometimes I stay awake almost all night thinking about him and start to cry all over again.Because of this I end up not having energy for my next day’s classes ,my attendance has dropped and am always in uni and on time. Generally he is a very nice guy ,he ended it because he said we were arguing a lot and not getting along.He is right we’ve been arguing during the pregnancy a lot .After the break up I kept ringing him and telling him I will change.I am in love with this guy and he is the best guy I have ever been with.I’m still hurt and in disbelief when he said he didn’t have any romantic feelings towards me anymore that hurt me faster than a lethal syringe.He texts me now and then mainly to check up on how am doing with the pregnancy,he is supportive with it but it’s not fair on me, him texting me as I just want to grieve the pain and not have any stress due to the pregnancy.i was really upset and i needed help, so i searched for help online and I came across a website that suggested that Dr Unity can help get ex back fast. So, I felt I should give him a try. I contacted him and he told me what to do and i did it then he did a spell for me. 28 hours later, my bf came to me and apologized for the wrongs he did and promise never to do it again. Ever since then, everything has returned back to normal. I and my bf are living together happily again.. All thanks to Dr Unity. If you have any problem contact Dr.Unity now and i guarantee you that he will help you. Here’s his contact. Email him at: Unityspelltemple@gmail.com ,you can also call him or add him on Whats-app: +2348071622464 ,His website: http://unityspelltemple.yolasite.com .

    ReplyDelete
  10. After being in relationship with Wilson for seven years,he broke up with me, I did everything possible to bring him back but all was in vain, I wanted him back so much because of the love I have for him, I begged him with everything, I made promises but he refused. I explained my problem to someone online and she suggested that I should contact a spell caster that could help me cast a spell to bring him back but I am the type that don't believed in spell, I had no choice than to try it, I meant a spell caster called Dr Zuma zuk and I email him, and he told me there was no problem that everything will be okay before three days, that my ex will return to me before three days, he cast the spell and surprisingly in the second day, it was around 4pm. My ex called me, I was so surprised, I answered the call and all he said was that he was so sorry for everything that happened, that he wanted me to return to him, that he loves me so much. I was so happy and went to him, that was how we started living together happily again. Since then, I have made promise that anybody I know that have a relationship problem, I would be of help to such person by referring him or her to the only real and powerful spell caster who helped me with my own problem and who is different from all the fake ones out there. Anybody could need the help of the spell caster, his email: spiritualherbalisthealing@gmail.com or call him +2349055637784 you can email him if you need his assistance in your relationship or anything. CONTACT HIM NOW FOR SOLUTION TO ALL YOUR PROBLEMS'

    ReplyDelete
  11. How i got my Husband back Thanks to Lord Alika for bringing back my Husband ,and brought great joy to my family??? My name is Kathryn Louise, My Ex-Husband dumped me two weeks ago after I accused him of seeing someone else and insulting him. I want him back in my life but he refuse to have any contact with me. I was so confuse and don't know what to do, so I reach to the internet for help and I saw a testimony of how a spell caster help people to get their ex back so I contact the spell caster and explain my problem to him and he cast a spell for me and assure me of 48hours that my ex will return to me and to my greatest surprise the third day my ex came knocking on my door and beg for forgiveness. I am so happy that my love is back again and not only that, we are about to get married. Once again thank you Lord Alika , You are truly talented and gifted. Web:http://lordalikaspelltemp8.Wix.Com/http is the only answer. He can be of great help and I will not stop publishing him because he is a wonderful man.Email: lordalikaspelltemple@yahoo.Co.Uk or +19287694882. Web:http://lordalikaspelltemp8.Wix.Com/http

    ReplyDelete
  12. My name is Sue Ball, and I am very happy for posting on this blog on how a great spell caster helped me in bringing back the love of my life. I know there are lots of women like me out there who have done so much to have back their Husband, I am here to tell you all to search no further because the answer is right here. I sincerely believe if there are up to five spell casters like Dr Trust this world would be a better place, I have seen people complaining on how fake spell castes promised to help them but couldn't but with Dr Trust I tell you your problem is solved already. My Husband and I had been apart for 3 YEARS and I couldn't bear without living without him, I have tried everything to have him back but nothing was working until I saw numerous testimonies about a spell caster called Dr Trust and how great his work is. I contacted him immediately and follow the step that he ask and in the next 48 hours my ex husband called me and was eager for my forgiveness and that he wished nothing more than to have me in his arms forever. I filled so much joy and happiness that I found Dr Trust, I hope you all here will find this testimony of mine and get your husband or love back in just 48 hours. E-mail address is Ultimatespellcast@gmail.com or Ultimatespellcast@yahoo.com You are the next to share your testimony to every one in the world.

    ReplyDelete