BEHIND THE CURTAIN CONTINUED: The humor of the music men!

TUESDAY, MAY 9, 2017

Comic relief—The three faces of TV:
When Dorothy peeked behind the curtain, she spotted a music man. Flawlessly, the leading authority has described this famous event:
Back at the Emerald City, the Wizard delays granting their requests. Then Toto pulls back a curtain and exposes the "Wizard" as a normal middle-aged man who has been projecting the fearsome image; he denies Dorothy's accusation that he is a bad man, but admits to being a humbug.
When the curtain was pulled back, Dorothy was able to see that the wizard was no such thing. All along, he'd been a music man!

The music men are numerous in our modern "press corps." Unfortunately, career liberals have long agreed—this curtain must never be drawn back, not Over Here on our side. In part for that reason, we liberals have proven unable to spot our own tribe's music men.

One such person may be Rachel Maddow. As a bit of comic relief, we thought we'd review the wonderfully comical, three-part tale which we'll offer under this name:

"The three faces of Rachel's TV"

In order to understand this story, you must be willing to accept a few unfortunate facts. Despite the marketing built around her, Maddow has proven to be a bit of a full-blown circus clown.

Also, a person who isn't obsessively honest. Also, a person devoted to selling the car, where the model in question is the car called The Maddow.

Dorothy saw a middle-aged person of little distinction perched behind that screen. Behind our own curtain sits a clown—and a devoted car salesman.

Does Maddow understand the extent to which she toys with facts? We would guess that she doesn't. But when the rewards become so vast, disordered people are drawn to the guild, and decent people get lost.

Within that framework, for comic relief, let's review the three faces of Rachel's TV:

Episode the first

It all began with a defining story. Rachel was the TV star who didn't own at TV!

Rachel began to host her own show in September 2008. By that time, NBC News had pioneered the use of the defining story with its big major stars.

Tim Russert was the unassuming son of the garbage collector from Buffalo. This pleasing story kept us from drawing back the curtain on other parts of his life.

Brian Williams was the kid who hung out with the volunteer firemen and always loved NASCAR. Eventually, other "defining stories" about this star brought his career to a halt.

Did the suits invent or select the story about Rachel's TV set? We have no idea, but the story became the go-to, defining tale in the early profiles of the new cable star.

Rachel was the TV star who didn't own a TV! Not that this made her smarter than us, she would add, thereby suggesting the opposite.

In truth, it wasn't so much that she didn't own a TV. Rachel couldn't own a TV! She was so fey, so "Little Prince," that she couldn't do that. Here's the way the story was told to the San Francisco Chronicle, Maddow's hometown newspaper:
GAROFOLI (9/11/08): Armed with self-deprecating humor and an impressive intellect, Maddow is the newest marquee commentator on a network that finds itself in the middle of controversy about blurring the line between political commentary and straight reporting...

Maddow won't touch the turmoil, saying she doesn't follow media issues. She might be the only TV talk show host who doesn't own a television—she hasn't since she left her folks' house to attend Stanford University.

“It's not like 'Oh, I am too righteous for television,’” Maddow said over lunch recently during the Republican National Convention in St. Paul. She lives in western Massachusetts with her partner of nine years and maintains an apartment in New York, where her nightly (6 p.m. Pacific time) show is produced.

“I have a constitutional weakness in which I am very easily distracted by flashing lights. If there is a TV on in the room, I can't have a conversation with you. I won't eat, I won't sleep, I'll just meld with my couch.”
Maddow wasn't like you and me. Unlike you and me, she had a constitutional weakness. It wouldn't allow her to own her own TV.

If you've watched Maddow selling the car, you'll recognize the play. Maddow is skilled at noting her lack of control as a way to define her uniqueness, her status as Our Own Patricia Pan.

She makes us rubes feel that she needs our help. She plays a highly skilled game.

At any rate, the defining story had been established. Rachel was the TV star who didn't (and couldn't) own a TV. Not that she's better that we are!

Episode the second

Uh-oh! In April 2009, a minor problem arose. It turned out that Rachel Maddow had actually bought a TV. This would require some skill and some hustle, selling The Maddow-wise.

Unintentional comedy followed. Donald J. Trump wasn't president yet, so "nos morituri" could still enjoy such self-adoring plays.

Rachel Maddow had bought a TV! The word went forth in various venues. Here's how Politico broke the news on April 8 of that fateful year:
TV host buys TV

Rachel Maddow has said in countless profiles that despite hosting a show on MSNBC, she doesn't actually own a television.

But Gawker, quoting an upcoming interview in Dossier magazine, points out that Maddow will soon be able to watch the broadcast networks—if not yet cable...
Just for now, we're omitting the comical part of the tale. But Maddow had broken the news during an interview with Dossier, "an independently published and owned bi-annual arts and culture journal" which may still exist.

Alex "Kid" Pareene had grabbed the story over at Gawker. "TV host buys TV," Politico's headline then blared.

The humor came as Maddow explained how the purchase happened. In this case, the humor was transplendent.

On Olympus, the gods were roaring with laughter. Below, you see the transcript published by Dossier. Did any humans, down below, really believe this tale?
DOSSIER: On a lighter note, people love to talk about the fact that you are on television and yet don't actually own a television.

RACHEL: Oh no, I got drunk last Thursday and ordered one on Amazon! (Laughs) Susan and I ordered takeout Chinese, and I made cocktails and then somehow it just happened. I mean, it wasn't like we were on some total bender or something—it was a weeknight—but I woke up the next morning, and there was the confirmation e-mail stating that we had indeed bought a $400 television. Of course, since we were drunk, we had it shipped to the wrong place, so now we have to get this giant box all the way to NYC from our place up in Massachusetts and figure out how to install it. Neither of us have had a TV in years and years. The last time I lived in a house with the TV was in 1990, when I moved out of my parents' house to go to college. Now there's a giant box with a TV sitting in Susan's art studio waiting for us.
We'd be inclined to call this play "maintaining the Little Prince pose." To wit:

When other people get blackout drunk, they engage in drunken sex play. When Rachel gets blackout drunk, she weirdly orders a TV set and sends it to the wrong place! She awakes to the paperwork!

Let's be fair! Rachel didn't tell Dossier that she got blackout drunk. Clearly though, the claim seemed to be implied. When she and Susan woke up the next day, the printouts were all around them! It seemed they didn't have any idea how the score had occurred!

Who knows? Maybe Rachel got blackout drunk one afternoon and told Dossier this story! Unfortunately, when Access Hollywood asked the suits if the unlikely tale was actually true, "an MSNBC publicist confirmed to Access Hollywood that the tale of her cocktail-inspired TV purchase was indeed legit."

Did anyone believe that crap? As the gods rocked with laughter, we tried to calm the analysts down. We told them they should chalk it up to skill at selling the car, and to disordered desire.

Episode the third

First, Rachel couldn't own a TV because she was just so different. When she actually bought a TV set, she seemed to have found a way to maintain that defining pose.

Did anybody actually think that Rachel was actually telling the truth? Who knows? During that same time span, she told Charlie Rose that she pays so little attention to the business of cable news that she didn't even know who was in her same time slot at Fox and CNN!

Did anyone believe that claim? Charlie just let it go.

The third chapter in this comical story appeared in 2014. In its Spring Design issue, New York Magazine offered these perplexing headlines:
Spring Design 2014
Where Rachel Maddow Is Allowed to Watch TV
A bathhouse that is more than just a bathhouse.
Say what? Rachel's allowed to do what?

In truth, this Spring Design photo spread squared a ridiculous circle. It wasn't just that Rachel had built a stand-alone bathhouse/TV room where she could bathe in her giant tub while watching her big-screen TV with her big fireplace going. To appearances, she allowed the photographer in, letting us see the way she now watches her great-big giant TV!

Not that there's anything wrong with it! There's nothing "wrong" with living the life of the corporate TV star. There's nothing wrong with overcoming your fear of cohabiting with a TV set.

That said, this three-part story captures the clownish culture which defines the persistent charade known as "TV news." Or so it somewhat comically seems to us.

Did Maddow buy that first TV because she was blackout drunk? Was she really unaware of the fact that she was competing with Sean Hannity over at Fox, and with Larry King Live?

Everything is possible! It's also possible that something may be a little bit "wrong" inside this persistent dissembler's self-referential head.

When the rewards become too large, it may be that the wrong people are attracted to this particular game. When stars become too rich and too famous, you may even end up with the low-grade dissembling which now typifies Maddow's devolving TV show.

That said, Maddow persistently serves us the comfort food we liberals very much like. As we wait for Mr. Trump's war, our tribe has been rewarding her for it.

When you pull the curtain back, some very strange people are involved in this devolving game. They're busily chasing money and fame. Their pitiful work reflects this destructive state of affairs.

The Others can't see through Sean, we say. As we complain, a fact becomes clear:

We can't see through Rachel!

Rachel is good at selling the car. In our view, she seems hopelessly devoted to the process, and to other cons:

She completely ducked Benghazi in 2012. She completely ducked Comey the God last year.

She praises Chris Matthews as a genius and friend. No one worked harder, down through the years, to defeat Candidate Gore, thus letting George Bush stage his war. No one worked harder, year after year, to make Candidate Clinton unelectable when push would finally come to shove, as it did last year.

As Matthews did those things, Jack Welch made him very rich—even let him summer on Nantucket. Matthews was Trump many years before Candidate Trump. Maddow is paid $10 million per year to sell you on his greatness.

(She loves Greta too!)

Persistently, we keep buying this fully-loaded, thoroughly ridiculous car. In this way, we're much like Them, the people we mock Over There.

Starting tomorrow: Curtain call!

10 comments:

  1. Maddow had the number one show in cable news at the moment and Bob is consumed with envy and jealousy. Columns like just expose Bob as the petty, nasty & small man that he is.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Comments like yours display quite a bit of pettiness and nastiness too.

      Delete
  2. Where do you buy a giant TV for $400?

    ReplyDelete
  3. "Gore, Gore, Gore, Gore, Gore" cried the analysts as Bob trots out the trombone to replay a tired old tune he has tooted many times too many.

    ReplyDelete
  4. "But when the rewards become so vast, disordered people are drawn to the guild, and decent people get lost."

    I think Chris Hayes is decent and has not gotten "lost" on his show. His ratings are going up and I'm sure he makes a lot of money too. I don't see much evidence that he is "disordered."

    There has always been a place in the entertainment world for narcissists. Oprah is a good example. Rachel Maddow is another. Narcissists tell stories about themselves that aren't true because they live in a fantasy world where they don't admit the truth about themselves to themselves. It would undermine their gradiosity.

    Somerby seems upset because news is entertainment, not because Maddow is a narcissist. News shouldn't be a flimflam. It should be informative and dependable and support our goal of educating the people so that they can participate competently in our democracy and live good lives.

    A disordered news media gives a home to so-called disordered people, those attracted by the opportunity to indulge their narcissism by doing something that makes them appear important.

    I don't care whether Maddow owns a TV or not. I do care whether news is accurately reported. I wish Somerby would stick to criticizing factual errors -- thereby correcting them. When he shifts to criticizing personality, he does nothing to fix the people he is criticizing and is kind of kicking down (since these are disabled people), not helping anyone much. It is beneath him to be doing this so regularly now. Maddow is sad but so is Somerby these days.

    Why isn't he talking about how the media is trying to discredit the resistance against Trump? He should be talking about how the media failed to report the crime of the century -- Trump's collusion with Russia to steal an election for his personal profit.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Some think the media colluded in the theft.

      Delete
    2. Some even think Trump fired Comey because he was mean to Hillary Clinton.

      Go figure.

      Delete
  5. Toto pulled back the curtain in 2008, and what we all saw was that the economy isn't a wizard, it's a humbug. There was no there there.
    The only value a stock has is how much you can sell it for (i.e. pass it off to the next sucker). They are all trading empty boxes, because they've been suckered into believing they aren't empty.
    We need to replace those racist Confederate statues of the South with statues of Toto.

    ReplyDelete
  6. I have something to share with you!!! There is a great joy in my heart
    which I want to share with everyone. My name is Caroline Webb from United
    States. I had a misunderstanding with my lover last year which led us to
    break up and he never wanted to hear my voice again. He saw a beautiful
    woman which he find more prettier than me, but as time went on I met god Dr lucky He is a great spell caster. I contacted him through his email and
    explained everything to him. He said that I shouldn't worry, that my lover
    will come back to me on his knees begging for forgiveness before 24
    hours.My greatest joy now is that he actually came back to me and fell on
    his knees begging for forgiveness, and today we are happy and he also cured
    my Sister's breast cancer. Do you have any problem? worry no more because
    Dr lucky can provide lasting spell solution to any problems:email him Dr luckysolutiontemple@gmail.com or call him +23480139792383 or add him on whats- app +23480139792383

    If you want your ex back.

    You want to be promoted in your office.

    If you want to be cured of HIV, Cancers and other diseases.

    You want to be rich.

    You want your husband/wife to be yours forever.

    If you need financial assistance.

    ReplyDelete





  7. only have this little chance to tell you people about this powerful spell caster that brought back my lover to me within 3days. His name is dr obasi of the Shrine For Solution.My Husband left home since four months ago without even a call from him.I have cried for help but all that heard my cry kept on collecting my money without doing anything.A friend introduced me to dr obasi because he has helped her own sister in bringing back her lover.I contacted him, i cried so much and he heard my cried and he said he is for real and not like others.I want to confirm to you people that the following morning after he has started the work, my lover emailed me and also sent his friends to beg me not to be angry that should he come home? He is hungry and love to be with me. My lover is back and how do you expect me not to talk about dr obasi ? How on earth do you expect me to forget about him.You can contact him and he will do it for you, i assure you. His email address is obasispelltemple@gmail.com His cell number is +2349065671269.I am 101% sure that he will do it for you too because i know that there are so many people who needs help.We have made love and getting ready for a trip to Dubai. Thank you once again dr obasi, i will forever be greatful to you.and his web site is [obasispelltemple.yolasite.com] I am Stephanie Wilson from UK

    IF YOU HAVE ANY PROBLEMS LIKE....

    1. LOTTERY SPELLS

    2. GETTING EX BACK SPELLS

    3. PREGNANCY SPELLS

    4. BROKEN MARRIAGE SPELLS

    5.CASINO SPELLS

    6. HIV CURE SPELLS

    7. PROTECTION SPELLS

    8. GETTING BACK TO GATHER AFTER A BREAKUP OR DIVORCE SPELL

    Do not cry anymore, contact this powerful spell caster Dr.obasi on his email: obasispelltemple@gmail.com or call +2349065671269 thank you

    ReplyDelete