MONDAY: Broadway came to CNN!

MONDAY, JUNE 9, 2025

The key words were "Good luck!" We watched George Clooney's Good Night, and Good Luck on CNN last Saturday night. 

Overwhelmingly, we were struck by how irrelevant to the current situation that high-profile effort was.

Edward R. Murrow's bout with Senator Joseph McCarthy took place in the fall of 1953—more than seventy years ago.  The television industry barely existed at that point in time!

There was no internet at that time, no 24-hour "cable news." Talk radio as we came to know it in the 1980s didn't yet exist.

There were no podcasts at all, let alone podcasts manned by comedians and the like. Indeed, social media didn't exist! It wasn't easy to hear crazy ideas and nutty claims—you had to seek them out. 

Life was very different then. The nation was almost exactly as described by Laura Ingalls Wilder in the first of her "Little House" books:

Chapter 1

Once upon a time, sixty years ago, a little girl lived in the Big Woods of Wisconsin, in a little gray house made of logs.

The great, dark trees of the Big Woods stood all around the house, and beyond them were other trees and beyond them were more trees. As far as a man could go to the north in a day, or a week, or a whole month, there was nothing but woods. There were no houses. There were no roads. There were no people. There were only trees and the wild animals who had their homes among them.

Wolves lived in the Big Woods, and bears, and huge wild cats. Muskrats and mink and otter lived by the streams. Foxes had dens in the hills and deer roamed everywhere.

To the east of the little log house, and to the west, there were miles upon miles of trees, and only a few little log houses scattered far apart in the edge of the Big Woods.

So far as the little girl could see, there was only the one little house where she lived with her Father and Mother, her sister Mary and baby sister Carrie. A wagon track ran before the house, turning and twisting out of sight in the woods where the wild animals lived, but the little girl did not know where it went, nor what might be at the end of it.

According to experts, that's roughly what life in the U.S. was like when Murrow and McCarthy clashed.

Today, crazy ideas, and disinformation, come at the American citizen from every conceivable point on the dial. The disinformation starts early in the morning and continues into the night.

It was puzzling to hear the Broadway audience applauding various events portrayed in the show. The applause seemed to suggest that the events of 1953 bore some significant resemblance to the state of play which obtains today.

Sorry, Charlie! Our current situation is much more complex—and it's phantasmagorically different. Pleasing tales about a greater American past aren't likely to help us now. The fact that we're eager to swallow such bait may represent a point of concern with respect to our ability to find our way out of this mess.

For amusement purposes only: Good Night, and Good Luck started as an Oscar-nominated 2005 feature film. The leading authority on the film includes this humorous bit of trivia:

Good Night, and Good Luck

[...]

One complaint about the film among test audiences was their belief that the actor playing McCarthy was too over the top, not realizing that the film used actual archive footage of McCarthy himself.

Assuming that story is actually true, something seemed to be wrong with the guy! In those days, as perhaps in these, test audiences apparently thought that couldn't be true in real life.

33 comments:



  1. "Overwhelmingly, we were struck by how irrelevant to the current situation that high-profile effort was."

    Hmm. I don't know about the current (since January 20th this year) situation, but what Democrats and their "woke" henchmen had been doing since 2016 is, if anything, worse than McCarthyism of 1953.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. What have Democrats and their "woke" henchmen have done?

      Delete
    2. That's true.

      Delete
    3. Ilya - this will get you primed:

      https://www.tabletmag.com/sections/news/articles/guide-understanding-hoax-century-thirteen-ways-looking-disinformation

      They used “disinformation” as a pretext to build a powerful system of social control launched under the guise of national security.

      Delete
    4. By having Musk transmit all our data to Putin. Dems sure are tricky fuckers.

      Delete
    5. https://transnational.live/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/a19feb55-8004-49fd-9491-7c642286e90c_12500x8333.webp

      I know it’s scary, but try not to act too gay about it.

      Delete
    6. Anon@7:10 -- I will read your link. However, how does this social control manifest itself?

      Delete
    7. A coordinated system where government agencies, tech companies, media, and NGOs suppress dissent by labeling it "disinformation."

      Delete
    8. Eg. in 2020, Twitter and Facebook suppressed a true story about Hunter Biden’s laptop after 51 former intelligence officials insinuated it was Russian disinformation. Their letter didn’t claim proof but used suggestive language, leading media and platforms to censor the story just before the election.

      Delete
    9. Or during COVID, people who posted that vaccinated individuals could still spread the virus had their posts removed or flagged as "misinformation", even though that later proved true. Platforms acted based on government guidance and direct pressure from agencies like the CDC and the White House, leading to censorship of accurate information that didn’t match their official narrative.

      Delete
    10. That's why Musk buying Twitter was a big deal.

      Delete
    11. Anonymouse 7:10pm, thanks!

      Delete
    12. I call bullshit 7:54, because exactly no vaccine has 100% efficacy. And thus all vaccines can allow transmission. Even a Chinese communist America hater like fauci knows this. Idiots high on idiot supply. Bless you child.

      Delete
    13. My pleasure, Cecelia.

      Delete
    14. "no vaccine has 100% efficacy"

      You're a science denying conspiracy theorist, Boris.

      Delete
    15. Right, Musk buying Twitter completely eliminated any partisan slant to Twitter! Bwahahahahaha!!!

      Delete
    16. This comment has been removed by the author.

      Delete
    17. Perusing the link, I can't discern the central thesis. There's a lot of handwaving about Facebook being pressured not to post disinformation -- but so what? If FB were to disappear tomorrow, would we be starved of information -- rather, disinformation Now that Twitter is squarely in the hands of drug-addled megalomaniac, have we discovered something earth-shattering and heretofore hidden from us?
      I think that someone is trying to make a mountain out of a molehill. When I want to read something new and under-reported, I go to Mother Jones or The Nation, not stupid Facebook or Instagram.

      Delete
    18. If you want to be taken seriously, you should read the entire piece carefully. It has a clearly stated central thesis that bears no resemblance to your sloppy and superficial misrepresentation of it here.

      Delete
    19. I can no longer access the link. However, "taken seriously" -- well, it's not that important to me. I do want to see what your side is feasting on and at least understand the roots of your confusion. How's that for being taken seriously.
      Perhaps, you should inform yourself of the Cambridge Analytica investigation and other such truly subversive operations.
      Again, it seems like it should be possible to relay the central thesis of your claim without my having to read a 30 page paper. Some of the claims there, right off the bat, sounded like pretty thin gruel.

      Delete
    20. Simple and to the point: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vG7CvbccdVM
      And if you want more, you read her book. If you want to know more about Trump and the Russians, you can read Luke Harding's Collusion. And, no, I don't believe that it was the Russian interference that won Trump his election in 2016.

      Delete
    21. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9Ikf1uZli4g

      Delete
    22. I'm sorry to see you've confirmed you are not serious.

      Delete
    23. I am sorry to see that you don't understand what 'serious' means. Before I make an investment into reading this massive treatise, I'd like to see the abstract. What theory is it putting forward.

      Delete
    24. Ilya - Once your computers know about Presidential elections coming down to the electoral vote of 150,000 to 200,000 people in three states, it becomes pretty easy for the fascists to pick off and dissuade enough voters. My Haitian friend and his crew were bamboozled by Cambridge Analytica using Facebook data manipulation that fed them Clinton Foundation /Haiti disinformation. A Russian/Peter Theil operation in 2016.

      Delete
  2. Is it Day One yet?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. And when the fuck will it end?

      Delete
  3. "The television industry barely existed at that point in time!" I disagree. A majority of the country had TV by 1954. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Television_set which would have included the wealthier and better educated people. The TV business was in its infancy, but that doesn't mean that people weren't paying a lot of attention to what was on it. Sen Kefauver almost got the Democratic nomination through his hearings in the early 50s.

    ReplyDelete
  4. If you see ANYONE posting the live locations of ICE agents, immediately take a screenshot & document it and forward to the FBI.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. And that will?

      Delete
    2. 7:03, did you work for The Stasi in your better days?

      Delete
  5. If Elon Musk hadn’t bought twitter, none of us would know what was going on in LA right now.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Absolutely, my wife watching local CBS and National NBC and PBS evening news did not see any of the felon's team pimping for a fight and proud boys disrupting peaceful protesters in LA. Checks with her, oh yes, every single one covered the felon's provacation.

      Delete