THE TROOPS: Secretary Noem does it again!

FRIDAY, JUNE 13, 2025

Blue America's troops gone wild: Yesterday, in the City of Angels, Kristi Noem did it again.

At the start of a press event, she made her latest (extremely) strange remark. Here's the transcript of what she was saying when the cameras swiveled around to a different part of the room:

NOEM (6/12/25): ...The Department of Homeland Security and the officers and the agencies and the departments and the military people that are working on this operation will continue to sustain and increase our operations in this city. We are not going away. We are staying here to liberate this city from the socialists and the burdensome leadership that this governor and that this mayor had placed on this country and what they have tried to insert into this city.

So I want to say thank you to every single person that has been able to do this. Also, I want to talk specifically to the rioters and to the politicians in Los Angeles.

[PAUSES]

I also want to talk specifically about how many of our agents have been doxxed for doing their duty. How they have been targeted and how their families have been put in jeopardy and that we're not going to allow that any more as well, that those individuals who are purposely endangering our ICE agents and our law enforcement officers and their families will be prosecuted for what they are doing as far as perpetuating violence on them.

As a general matter, people who purposely endanger law enforcement officers should be stopped from doing that. That said, we start with the remarkable statement we've highlighted above.

Noem has said and done a wide assortment of strange things in her current post. "Suck it," she thoughtfully wrote on May 22, commenting on a lawsuit against her department which had been dismissed. 

Los Angeles is really "a city of criminals," she pathetically stated last week.

Cricket is gone, but this person remains! Yesterday, she made this amazing remark:

We [ICE] are not going away. We are staying here to liberate this city from the socialists and the burdensome leadership that this governor and that this mayor had placed on this country and what they have tried to insert into this city.

Secretary Noem to the rescue! Her federal agency will stay in L.A. "to liberate it from the leadership" its mayor, and the governor of its state, have placed upon that realm.

Also, no socialists allowed! For the record, that wasn't a clumsy offhand remark. That was actually part of the secretary's prepared text.

As presented, the quoted remark doesn't quite parse, but Noem may have been distracted at that point. By the time of that remark, voices could be heard from elsewhere in the room. 

She briefly paused, at the indicated point, as a brief bit of turmoil played out. We now switch our attention to Senator Padilla (D-CA), an impressive person whose personal history reminds us of a very important point:

Talent emerges from all locales! The leading authority speaks:

Alex Padilla

Alejandro Padilla (born March 22, 1973) is an American politician serving as the senior United States senator from California, a seat he has held since 2021. A member of the Democratic Party, Padilla served as the 30th secretary of state of California from 2015 to 2021 and was a member of the California State Senate and the Los Angeles City Council.

[...]

Padilla is one of three children of Santos and Lupe Padilla, both of whom moved from Mexico, specifically Jalisco and Chihuahua, before meeting and marrying in Los Angeles, where he was born. He grew up in Pacoima, Los Angeles, and graduated from San Fernando High School in the northeast San Fernando Valley. He earned a degree in mechanical engineering from Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) in 1994. 

After graduation, Padilla moved back to Pacoima and briefly worked as an engineer for Hughes Aircraft, where he wrote software for satellite systems.

Padilla is a former member of the governing board of MIT...

His father worked as a short-order cook, his mother as a housekeeper. Their son emerged with an engineering degree from MIT, reminding us of the remarkable fact that talent can emerge from anywhere on the dial.

(In the case of President Lincoln, it emerged, in an inexplicable way, from the nation's backcountry, In the case of the Presidents Roosevelt, it emerged from the nation's highest salons.)

People swear by the character of Senator Padilla. We'd be strongly inclined to assume that those people have it right.

That said, it seems to us that he submitted to a bit of imperfect judgment yesterday. 

In this morning's news report, the New York Times offers an instant summary.  We'll highlight an important word which has been widely disappeared:

Calif. Senator Forcibly Removed and Handcuffed After Interrupting Noem

Senator Alex Padilla, Democrat of California, was forcibly removed on Thursday from a news conference being held by Kristi Noem, the homeland security secretary, and handcuffed after he interrupted Ms. Noem at a federal building in West Los Angeles.

“Sir! Sir! Hands off!” Mr. Padilla, 52, shouted as federal agents tried to muscle him out of the room inside a government office building about 15 miles west of downtown Los Angeles where Ms. Noem was speaking. “I am Senator Alex Padilla. I have a question for the secretary.”

[...]

In the tense hyperpartisanship of the moment, the episode quickly swelled into a cause célèbre for both parties...

The key word is "interrupted." That word appears in the first paragraph of the Times report, but also in the headline.

Yesterday, the corporate stars of Blue America disappeared that word. If you're a denizen of Blue America, you should be very unhappy about the way these less than fully impressive people, along with their less than fully impressive predecessors, have served your interests over the past (let's say) 33 years.

People swear by Senator Padilla's character; we don't doubt that assessment. But in our view, he displayed a bit of imperfect judgment during yesterday event.

In our view, so did Nicolle Wallace and the standard assortment of Blue American corporate hacks on MSNBC's succession of programs. Instantly, they started feeding us cable news viewers the kind of porridge which leaves us well-fed and glad. 

They kept forgetting to mention the fact that Senator Padilla had suddenly interrupted Secretary Noem as she tried to make her (remarkable) opening statement. No, you're not supposed to do that—and Senator Padilla, who is said to be mild-mannered, seemed remarkably exercised when security tried to make him stop. 

The senator is much larger than those agents were. He kept shoving back against them and attempting to interrupt further. 

In our view, he shouldn't have done that. Lincoln also made mistakes at points along the way.

No, Virginia! Senator Padilla wasn't simply "doing his oversight" when he tried to interrupt, as Blue America's pundits quickly agreed to say. And when Wallace came on the air at 4 p.m., she repeatedly said that Noem had lied lied lied lied lied lied lied in an earlier appearance on Fox.

She dropped the L-bomb a hundred times. Meanwhile, Senator Padilla was perhaps less than fully descriptive when he made this statement, not long after he'd been shoved out of the room and roughly handcuffed:

SENATOR PADILLA (6/12/25): I came to the press conference to see what she had to say, to see if I could learn any new information, and at one point I had a question. And let me emphasize this as we've emphasized the right for people to peacefully protest and to stand up for their First Amendment rights.

I was there peacefully, and at one point I had a question, and so I began to ask a question. I was almost immediately forcibly removed from the room. I was forced to the ground, and I was handcuffed.

I was not arrested. I was not detained. I will say this—if this is how this administration responds to a senator with a question, if this is how the Department of Homeland Security responds to a senator with a question, you can only imagine what they're doing to farmworkers, to cooks, to day laborers out in the Los Angeles community and throughout California.

"At one point, I had a question," he said, two separate times. "And so I began to ask a question." 

All that is true! He omitted the fact that Noem was delivering her opening remarks when he loudly interrupted so he could ask his question.

He failed to say that he loudly interrupted the person in question. The word "interrupted" was then widely disappeared all through the rest of the day on the corporate cable news channel which services Blue America.

No, Virgina! You aren't supposed to show up at a press event and loudly interrupt. You aren't "doing your oversight" when you do that, and you may even find yourself being removed from the room.

We don't know why Senator Padilla staged that interruption. We don't know why he seemed to be so exercised as the agents in question removed him from the room

Did those agents behave correctly? This very morning, on Morning Joe, one Blue American pundit explicitly said that they did. 

(Maria Teresa Kumar: "The Secret Service were doing their job.") 

Kumar quickly pivoted to a rather tortured criticism of Noem herself. Yesterday, on the less deceptive CNN, security correspondent Josh Campbell offered an assessment in which he largely, though not completely, agreed with Kumar's initial assessment. 

Campbell is a former special agent with the FBI—and no, he isn't pro-Trump.

Kumar quickly pivoted to a criticism of Noem.  More specifically, she pivoted to the claim that "a more talented politician" would have intervened from the podium to remedy the situation. 

As always, everything's possible! In our view, that was classic tribal novelization—novelization all the way down.

Did Noem understand what was happening during this brief event? Did she know that it was Senator Padilla who was trying to interrupt?

From the available videotapes, we see no proof that she did. 

Was she lying lying lying during her subsequent appearance on Fox? Given her recent awful record, we don't doubt that she'd be willing to do so, but we see no obvious proof that she did.

Starting at 4 o'clock Eastern, we did see a succession of pundits standing in line to toe Blue America's (corporate) line. These people have served Blue America's interests very poorly during the past many years.

The woods are lovely, dark and deep—but those of us in Blue America aren't the moral and intellectual giants we've long presumed ourselves to be. We're gifted with imperfect judgment, a bit like everyone else.

Our lizard brains will want to say that our remarks just have to be wrong. Unfortunately, our lizard brains have often served us very poorly since President Trump came down the escalator in June 2015.

So have our corporate pundits! All through the Biden years, their shaky judgment helped create the world in which President Trump made his way back to the White House.

They swore there was nothing wrong at the southern border. Until they could say it no more, they swore there was nothing wrong with President Biden himself.

They swore that inflation was all in the dumb voters' heads. They spent years trying to get Trump locked up, in the (pleasing) course of which they likely helped him get elected.

(They kept saying that we voters needed to know if Candidate Trump, on one occasion, had had sex with Stormy Daniels ten years before. No, you can't get dumber than that—but our stars were willing to try.)

In our view, Senator Padilla—a good and decent, remarkable person—submitted to a bit of imperfect judgment yesterday. 

He could have let the secretary speak, then tried to raise his question at the more appropriate time. Instead, he rose to loudly interrupt. Sometimes, if not for all the imperfect judgment, there would be no judgment at all!

Blue America's corporate pundits largely took things from there. "In the tense hyperpartisanship of the moment," they invented a whole new set of ways to put their thumbs on the scale.

Noem made her latest very strange statement. We Blues took over from there!

144 comments:

  1. After this publicity stunt, Noem met privately with Sen Padilla to answer his questions.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Did the senator collude with the secretary in this “publicity stunt”, or was the thuggish overreaction of the agents against the senator and noem’s ignoring of it just happenstance, or perhaps a perfect fortuitous public illustration of the fascist mindset of the secretary and the president?

      Delete
    2. Does the fact that the Secretary LIED her fucking ass off about the incident on Fox NOOZ before she realized it had been recorded make any difference to you, Dickhead in Cal, you fucking fascist freak?

      Here is what the fucking fascist dress-up queen was saying at the fucking press conference precisely right before she completely ignored the fucking US Senator from your fucking State, and approximately at the same time the Federal judge was telling this fucking fascist administration that we don't have fucking kings in this country.

      "We are not going away. We are staying here to liberate the city from the socialists and the burdensome leadership that this governor and that mayor have placed on this country and what they have tried to insert into the city." Kristi Noem (United States Secretary of Homeland Security)

      Sounds like she was being slightly performative, wouldn't you agree, Dickhead, you fucking fascist freak? Under what authority does this imbecile in charge of Homeland Security think she can take off the governance of the state of California, your fucking fascist freak?

      Delete
    3. He interrupted?

      O, whar muh civility? Why couldn't he be more like the "patriots" of January 6? They all showed impeccable manners!

      Delete
    4. Precisely: Senator Padilla interrupted the Nazi just as she was making her big announcement to the city and the state that the occupying Wehrmacht was there to stay.

      Delete
    5. Kind of reminiscent of the episode at the detention center in NJ.

      Delete
    6. When DiC has the first comment you know the thread gonna be a shit pile of utter nonsense.

      Delete
    7. Padilla knew that these men are security officers and that they have protocols for protection. Why didn’t he comply with their instructions rather than acting as though he could wrestle them and shout and rush the woman at the podium? (TWICE) He acted like a dangerous drunk. He did that in order to claim that he was singled out as a Hispanic male. It’s the left’s typical dog-and-pony stuff.

      Delete
    8. Mm-hmm, 2:04. Glad to get your apology for the fascists, every damn day.

      Delete
    9. Anonymouse 2:06pm, I’m not glad to see you argue like a cretin. I wish you had some sense.

      Delete
    10. 2:02: to be fair, when Cecelia shows up, it becomes a massive shit show, just if a different kind.

      Delete
    11. Anonymouse 2:10pm, count on it.

      Delete
    12. You don’t even believe Somerby yourself much of the time, Cecelia. And DiC makes a habit of trying to prove Somerby wrong when he claims there’s something wrong with Trump. Why don’t you get a hobby offline?

      Delete
    13. Anonymouse 2:26pm, I’m not sure what you mean by whether I “believe” Somerby. He’s a liberal and I’m a conservative. There are things that he says that I don’t “believe”. He says some things that I think are probably horse shite. However, even then Bob generally has approached those topics from a standpoint that I don’t find completely inarguable. On the other hand, you can’t tolerate dissent of any type. I don’t know how you got that way. It makes you idiotic.

      Delete
    14. Every one of your comments is projection, Cecelia. You in reality cannot tolerate dissent. Witness your comments here. You, like DiC, refuse to believe that there is something wrong with Trump, which is a major Somerby theme, you watch and enjoy Gutfeld, which Somerby likens to toxic sludge. You add nothing but bile to these comments, but you do represent the fascist MAGA faction quite well.

      Delete
    15. Anonymouse 2:46pm, I’ve never denied that Trump has significant flaws. I don’t watch Gutfeld. I don’t believe in Bob’s core political ideology (or my younger brother’s). I like them both. Particularly the latter one. Take your tripe and stuff it.

      Delete
    16. Bob’s right. What Padilla did by heckling her was dumb and counterproductive. He should have waited until she was finished and then lain into her good.

      Delete
    17. You admitted to watching Gutfeld fairly recently, Cecelia. Why don’t you stuff your tripe too? Maybe don’t insult every single comment. Up to you though. And if you support Trump, you support authoritarianism. Simple as that.

      Delete
    18. 3:04: it’s so simple, innit, when you aren’t risking anything, but merely carping from the sidelines?

      Delete
    19. Anonymouse 3:07pm, I did not admit that. I’ve seen clips of Gutfeld! Some linked here. And I’ve watched it for minutes when scrolling thru the dial, long before Bob started blogging on it. Your last sentence is why you’re a closed book. You want to see a fanatical authoritarian unable to tolerate even Bob’s mild lack of complete religiosity toward your cause? Look in the mirror.

      Delete
    20. Cecilia, as I've said before, I like you, but I often disagree. I don't disagree with what TDH says in this post about Padilla's interruption. It would be nice if discussion could be about substance, instead of searching for things to be outraged about. Saying that, TDH made some comments about what Noem said in her speech, which I also agree with. Isn't her method of characterizing the situation in LA going way over the top, in a highly inappropriate way? You don't address that.

      Delete
    21. anon 12:26, I get your passion, but you make a screed where the adjective "fucking" seems to precede every noun. Not an effective may of convincing anyone. the fact is the majority (a slim one) voted for the "fascist." Have you considered that there might be valid reasons why the dems lost the presidency, senate and house because of their own lack of appeal?

      Delete
    22. "Isn't her method of characterizing the situation in LA going way over the top, in a highly inappropriate way? You don't address that.?"

      May it be that the whole point is Padilla's actions took the attention away from her characterization and made it about himself?

      Delete
    23. Have you considered that there might be valid reasons why the dems lost the presidency,..

      You want to know why the Dems have no political power? Read the comments here stabbing Padilla in the back.

      Delete
    24. AC/MA, I know that you like me despite our political difference and I like you too. We’ll accept each other as we are.

      Delete
    25. AC/MA be civil to the cult cranks and weirdos? They never offer the same courtesy. They are fully fine with a lifelong crook and financial con man, who is now reduced to speaking gobbledygook, as our dear leader. They care nothing about policy, aside from those people getting hurt worse than them. Fuck 'em.

      Delete
    26. Anonymouse 8:04pm, or you could dedicate your life to being one of three or four people who tell off a blogger every day. There’s got to be a some Nobel Prize category for that great effort for the betterment of mankind,

      Delete
    27. We must all defend truth these days.

      Delete
  2. Padilla displayed “imperfect judgment.”

    Depends on how you look at it.

    Not sure anyone should be held to the standard of “perfect” judgment.

    Totally sure that a US Senator should not be treated this way.

    But question: did Padilla cause Noem and her thugs to display their tendencies merely by “interrupting” her? A revealing moment for them, and for us. Educational, I would say.

    Somerby is happy to ride down the slippery slope where right wingers get to “justify” the creeping authoritarianism by complaining about an “interruption.” Get the fainting couches!

    It’s likely that many many Americans will be unwilling to fault Padilla here, as Somerby seems aching to do.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Exactly, this is a repugnant, mask-off post for Somerby and his right wing inclinations.

      Delete
    2. The truth is that Padilla interrupted Noem. The truth is that Blue Media glossed over that interruption.

      Telling the truth does not imply "right wing inclinations."

      Delete
    3. It was not “glossed over.” But what is the point in mentioning it?

      Delete
    4. Did you watch the video, DG? Our esteemed DHS Secretary didn't miss a beat. She then went of Fox and lied about what happened. Did he identify himself? It sure sounded like it to me. Was he attempting to charge the podium? Are you fucking kidding me?

      Delete
    5. 1:59 - Almost all true. And it's also true that Padilla interrupted Noem.

      Delete
    6. So what, DG? That is used as a pretext for the thuggery and the authoritarianism. And Somerby is aiding that with posts like this.

      Delete
    7. 2:09 - So, in your view, inconvenient truths should be suppressed for the greater good?

      Delete
    8. Nothing is being “suppressed”, DG. It was in the freaking headline of the NYT article.

      Delete
    9. Any U.S. politician should be treated PRECISELY the same way those officers would have treated a civilian who failed to follow their instructions. If a Republican senator had tried this crap, you’d be bashing the hell out of him/her for an overweening sense of privilege and authority.

      Delete
    10. That Republican senator would not have been wrestled and handcuffed by the authorities. Your fascist apologia continues apace.

      Delete
    11. 2:17 - We're just repeating Somerby's post. Yes, the NYT put the interruption in the headline; yes, blue corporate pundits then disappeared that fact. And Somerby's noting both of these true points does not imply "right-wing inclinations."

      Delete
    12. Padilla interrupted Noem is not the most salient part of the story. I am not sure that it should get top billing.

      Delete
    13. I am certain that it shouldn’t get top billing. Maybe deserves a mention somewhere but the most important point is that federal thugs assaulted a US senator and put him in handcuffs for trying to say something to the secretary who is famously unwilling or unable to answer questions in any form including in front of Congress. When you chastise Padilla for his “ imperfect judgment”, as Somerby does, you then give tacit support to those who want to use it as a pretext to detain or arrest opposition politicians. That’s fascism, and it must be resisted.

      Delete
    14. Nor does it bother me, in the slightest, that Padilla interrupted Noem. If I were there, I might have vomited when she said that she was going to liberate Los Angeles from its democratically-elected leadership. I'm glad Padilla spoke up.

      Delete
    15. Any U.S. politician should be treated PRECISELY the same way ...

      Like those fucking ignorant republican congress critters were treated when they heckled President Biden's State of the Union address to the country. Go fuck yourself, Cec. The Senator was escorted into the room. She has been ignoring his calls to find out what the actual fuck this fascistic administration thinks they are doing to his state, his constituents. He represents those people in LA, she doesn't.

      Delete
    16. Good, DG. But Somerby faulted Padilla for using “imperfect judgment”, then he accused certain media of not mentioning Padilla’s transgression, then he went in to complain about certain media calling Noem a liar. I mean, he’s far more passionate about that than what was done to Padilla. I’m just sayin..,

      Delete
    17. "When you chastise Padilla for his 'imperfect judgment', as Somerby does, you then give tacit support to those who want to use it as a pretext to detain or arrest opposition politicians."

      So you believe that inconvenient truths should be suppressed for the greater good of combatting fascism. Somerby (as I read him) sees that belief as part of the problem we Blues have had in combatting fascism.

      Delete
    18. CC - I don't think it's true that Padilla rushed the podium.

      Delete
    19. Does no one remember President Biden being heckled continuously by republican congress critters during his State of the Union?

      Delete
    20. DG at 2:44: then, if true, you tell the “media” to mention it. But why attack Padilla, as Somerby did?

      Delete
    21. The fucking Speaker of the House suggested the other day that Governor Newsom should be "tarred and feathered". Fuck you people with your concerns with civility.

      Delete
    22. To expand on my point from 2:44 -- A truth: Padilla interrupted Noem. This will be something that is broadcast all over red media. The blue response could be -- silence, as we try to disappear that fact. Or, the blue response could be -- Yes, because any red-blooded American would stand up to a wanna-be authoritarian who was saying that she was going to liberate Los Angeles from its democratically-elected mayor and governor.

      Which do you think would be more effective?

      Delete
    23. My original post at 11:41 suggested that not only did Padilla not exercise “imperfect judgment”, but what he did was very revealing. It caused Noem to reveal her true colors. Somerby calls it imperfect judgment, but I call it speaking truth to fascist thugs. that’s how you oppose fascism.

      Delete
    24. dg, you are still avoiding the question of why did Somerby feel the need to attack Padilla for what he did? If this is a question of the media reaction to what he did, that’s one thing, but he attacks the senator for what he did. Answer that one.

      Delete
    25. Have “red-blooded” sense enough to know that barging into a press conference and rushing toward Noem twice is generally going to get your arse soundly whipped. Understand too that the fact that this did not happen to Padilla is due to HIS privilege.

      Delete
    26. 2:58 -- I don't see a statement that an imperfect human exercised imperfect judgment is an attack, especially while saying that he was a "decent, remarkable person" and comparing him to Lincoln.

      Delete
    27. Actually, this sort of typifies the mindset of the cult of Somerby haters who populate this comment section. Somerby obviously admires Padilla. He tells us that Padilla is "an impressive person" and sketches his rise from being the son of Mexican immigrants up through getting an engineering degree from MIT and through to his election as a United States Senator. Somerby tells us that people "swear" by Padilla's character, and Somerby says he personally does not doubt that assessment.

      And yet, in the mind of the cultists, Somerby is "attacking" Padilla, which (in their minds) proves his secret, right-wing, inclinations.

      Delete
    28. It’s this constant harping on some democra

      Delete
    29. He did attack Padilla. He blames Padilla’s poor judgment for…what exactly?

      Delete
    30. BTW, you can attack me by comparing me to Lincoln and FDR any time.

      Delete
    31. What would Somerby or you suggest would be the “perfect” thing Padilla could have done?

      Delete
    32. 3:25 - I can't speak for Somerby, but I think what Padilla did was pretty darn good. Like I said, in my view any true American should immediately stand up and protest against dangerous authoritarian drivel.

      Delete
    33. Actually, I can tell you what Somerby thinks Padilla should have done, because he told us:

      "He could have let the secretary speak, then tried to raise his question at the more appropriate time."

      Delete
    34. Jeez people, Padilla obviously used poor judgment here and was treated by the Secret Service exactly how anyone else would have been. The MSNBC crowd ignores what actually happened, Bob simply points that out here, and you people go nuts.

      Even worse, MSNBC kept playing the takedown video, but they avoided showing the longer one where Padilla was clearly heckling her while she was still reading.

      Wonder why. Because it tells a bit more of the rest of the story?

      These Dems are so hapless now. Waiting until she took questions and THEN getting thrown out for your speech would have been so much more effective for Padilla.

      Delete
    35. Why do you think what Padilla did showed poor judgment? His treatment by government goons made a powerful point that won’t be lost on the American people.

      Delete
    36. Read Bob’s comments about it. He’s totally correct. Padilla jumped the gun — he blew it because he made the (standard btw) FBI takedown the issue rather than Noem’s nuttiness.

      Delete
    37. Exactly, JC. Ironically, his actions took the focus away from her nuttiness. It was effective for riling up entrenched Dem supporters but probably will not do much for turning around their significant decline in popularity.

      Delete
    38. Ah yes. If only Padilla had stood there quietly and then made some concerned statements at the end, it would have been so much more effective. 🙄

      Delete
    39. He could have raised holy hell either at question time or even right after she stopped her little speech.

      Delete
  3. Somerby thinks Noem was unaware of what was going on.

    Next, he’ll be telling us there’s something wrong with her.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Her plastic surgery removes her human exo flesh to reveal the lizard underneath. So gross

      Delete
  4. The New York Times says “ the episode quickly swelled into a cause célèbre for both parties...”

    That’s how the NYT does it these days.

    The fascists have a point. They were “interrupted.”

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. By not keeping beyond reproach, Padilla made it easy to do. That’s a dumb tactic.

      Delete
    2. Of course. The opposition must always be “beyond reproach.” A rather difficult, if not impossible, goal.

      By the way, Padilla made a rather effective point, I thought.

      Delete
    3. It would have been more effective if he’d waited to actually make it. THEN get thrown out for his speech if that was their want.

      If Padilla was engaging in such an effective strategy, let’s see Adam Schiff start to do that too — heckle and interrupt, Or all the Dems.

      Hint: it ain’t effective.

      Delete
    4. 4:35 It makes the spectacle the story instead of a substantive and accurate challenge.

      Delete
    5. The story is that federal goons are arresting/manhandling opposition politicians.

      Delete
    6. 4:43 Yes, that's what I said.

      Delete
    7. The federal goons were the S Service and the FBI and they would have dragged anyone else out of there too — and probably have arrested them which they didn’t do to Padilla.

      Delete
    8. It was a press briefing. It is traditional to ask questions at such an event. They targeted Padilla to make a point about taking down down CA blue leadership, which Padilla exemplifies. Don’t claim he did anything to deserve being manhandled.

      Delete
  5. Lincoln emerged from a well-off family, his grandfather being a wealthy and powerful land-owner.

    Granted, Lincoln's father faced hardships when his dad was killed and his brother inherited all the wealth, but the fact remains President Lincoln descended from a well-off well-connected family.

    You should not expect Somerby to be a reliable narrator, his knowledge is shallow, same with his values.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Somerby:

    "They swore there was nothing wrong at the southern border. Until they could say it no more, they swore there was nothing wrong with President Biden himself.

    They swore that inflation was all in the dumb voters' heads. They spent years trying to get Trump locked up, in the (pleasing) course of which they likely helped him get elected."


    This is really dumb analysis, a combination of misleading nonsense and misinformation.

    In reality, border crossings started to spike under Trump, due to his disastrous foreign policies creating dumpster fires all over the world. This spike was halted by the pandemic, which drove pent up demand for immigrants. Biden addressed this immediately after becoming president, so much so that Fox News was complaining daily about all of Biden's actions towards the border issue (not his inaction, that is pure fantasy on the part of Somerby).

    In reality Biden has been fighting the nonsense about cognitive decline since he started campaigning in 2019, and of course he resoundingly won in 2020. Many journalists and public intellectuals, including the straight shooting Heather Cox Richardson, interviewed Biden in his last year of his presidency, and they all reported that he showed no sign of cognitive decline.

    In reality, Biden inherited a mess from Trump, with high inflation directly a result of Trump mishandling the pandemic. Biden quickly got to work and lowered inflation, in fact it was one of the most historic lowerings of inflation in record time.

    In reality, Trump is corrupt to the core, a career criminal. Locking Trump up is indeed the correct and proper manner to deal with someone like Trump; presidents are not above the law.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Somerby, thumb, scale.

    Rinse and repeat.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Ignorance aint gonna manufacture itself.

      Delete
    2. Somerby prefers a new world order, a post democracy world, where elites rule the masses.

      To accomplish this Somerby encourages Dems/non right wingers to capitulate to Repubs/right wingers. Somerby wants Dems to lie back and quietly take it, as Repubs have their way in destroying our country. Somerby wants to ignore the oppressed, wants them silenced and quietly working themselves to death.

      These atrocious right wing views do not occur in a vacuum, Somerby is a wounded and traumatized lost soul.

      Delete
    3. “Somerby is a wounded and lost soul.” Then we are to empathize with him, no?

      Delete
    4. I’m good with that.

      Delete
    5. We are to pity him.

      Delete
    6. Trump gave an interview a while ago - on the internet now. He is apparently gifted at music. As explained, at the age of 11-12, his parents took him for 3 days of testing to see where his strengths were and they were told about his musical proclivity ultimately. Let’s break that down. An excellent student due to inherit the family business needs an assessment of his strengths to plan his future. How about this question: why is my kid such a train wreck in school? Unwittingly Trump was telling the story of a three day assessment for his learning disability. You don’t cart a middle school child who is doing well academically off for three days of testing to evaluate for his career plans. It is entirely possible that at the end of the 3 days the most positive assessment of this problematic child was that he had an ear for music.

      Delete
    7. Boy genius learned to toot the flute out his ass.

      Delete
  8. Observing this right wing vanity blog wither away, is not unamusing.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I don’t know, a hundred comments in less than 3 hours is pretty good.

      And it ain’t right wing. Just reasonable and smart — if you want umbrage and sanctimoniousness, tune in to MSNBC. You’ll get a lot of “geezers, let’s screw your kids out of your house and life insurance” commercials too!

      Delete
    2. Most of them are Cecelia and DiC, spreading lies.

      Delete
  9. Somerby's buyer's remorse over Trump is....actually more and more it seems Somerby does not have buyer's remorse, and is kind of getting off on Trump's presidency, oddly delighting in it rather than enduring and resisting it.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Like most right wingers, Somerby is a weird mix of masochist and sadist, a servile cuck to authoritarians while punching down on the oppressed.

      Delete
    2. I think you have to have a major screw loose to think that Somerby is a Trump supporter.

      Delete
    3. And I think you have to have a major screw loose to focus on Padilla’s “interruption.”

      Delete
    4. Everyone else is — and that’s the problem with what he did. No one’s talking about her words.

      Delete
    5. EVERYONE is talking about her words, dipshit.

      Except Fox News, of course.

      Delete
  10. Padilla rolled his eyes at bizarre statements that Noem made, so he was taken outside and beaten within an inch of his life. That's in the near future. Or possibly shot in a quarry like another unfortunate mammal that irked our esteemed DHS villainess.

    It's possible that Padilla interrupted Noem's stream of gobbledygook. I am not sure that that's the headline that should open up this story. Yeah, it's marginally important to note it somewhere.
    The salient bits in this story are:
    1. Noem so detached that she doesn't recognize the senior senator from the state that she is liberating. Not entirely surprising given that she doesn't know the meaning of Habeas Corpus. I guess she passed her high school US history class with a 'D'.
    2. More importantly: this administration is so very keen at demonstrating its capricious power over anyone and everyone who gets in its way.

    I guess if Padilla had just stood there silently with his eyes fixed on the floor, everything would have been fine. That's our future.
    PS: Don't forget to go to the 'no kings rally' tomorrow. Just ask Alexa to point you to the one nearest you.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. No one was asking that of him. But by heckling that way he totally blew the moment to really go after her.

      Delete
    2. How would he have gone after her without interrupting, i.e. 'heckling' her?

      Delete
    3. if you think it’s ok for Padilla to “go after” Noem by trying to commandeer her press conference, then you shouldn’t have one nanosecond of concern when security does their job by going after HIM.

      Delete
    4. Next time Padilla should stand his US Citizen Hispanic ground and gun down Noem like she was an annoying bitch in a gravel pit.

      Delete
    5. Anonymouse 8:09pm, it would be karma.

      Delete
    6. Cecelia, I heard Noem shoots the goats that can't please her. She likes to dress her goats in uniform.

      Delete
  11. The Trumpers delighted in hailing Trump as the so called anti-war president, that includes the few trolls that infect this comment section.

    Yet in reality, Trump has always been pro war, with higher military deaths than Biden and more drone killings than Obama, and Trump doing nothing to stop Russia's ongoing invasion of Ukraine, doing nothing to stop Israel's genocide of Palestinians, Trump bombing Yemen (killing children but accomplishing nothing towards stopping the Houthis), and now Trump supporting Israel declaring war against Iran.

    Crickets from the hypocritical Trump supporters/trolls on all this.

    It is well established that for Republicans, lacking integrity is a feature, not a bug.

    It is all nearly a laugh, but it's really a cry.

    ReplyDelete
  12. Funny enough, Trump posted just yesterday that farmers are losing really good workers who only lack one little thing. TACO trump is hearing from some big ag and business interests.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. You notice the people who hire these undocumented workers never have anything to worry about? How does that fucking work?

      Delete
    2. They are Trump donors.

      Delete
    3. Interestingly enough, hiring someone who is undocumented is a crime. I never see it being prosecuted.

      Delete
    4. In my state (FL), farmers have plowed ripe tomatoes back into the ground that have no pickers. Trump has the lowest approval rating of any president this far into his term in 80 years, and the upcoming inflation/recession isn’t going to help.

      Delete
    5. DeSantis wanted to use children to replace migrant farmworkers but the bill scuttling child labor laws did not make it through the Florida legislature, who have turned on him.

      Delete

  13. Squeal, squeal, Soros-bots. Squeal louder and more often.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. What's that musky smell?

      Delete
    2. All illegals must be deported.

      … but not those great farm workers. So unfair.

      90 trade deals in 90 days.

      …well, maybe zero. But soon!

      You’re the one who ought to be squealing, 2:10.

      Delete
    3. Quaker in a BasementJune 13, 2025 at 3:29 PM

      Miller sets quotas and Trump grants exceptions. Life is tough for ICE.

      Delete
    4. That musky smell is trumps junk in a fourteen y.o. with Epstein holding her down.

      Delete
  14. Padilla was interviewed on MSNBC last evening. Noem met him after the incident for 15 minutes. He stated in his interview that she refused to answer a single fucking question he has her.

    Are we all supposed to pretend we don't notice these fucking arrogant pricks running this country don't think they have to follow the Constitution. Did anyone get a load of Hegseth testimony to the Senate? He would not even answer direct questions whether he would abide by the courts decision. Are we supposed to be polite to these thugs who are destroying our republic right before our eyes?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Don’t give them the opportunity to make YOU the issue. You gotta keep your own noses clean.

      Delete
    2. Good point 4:15. It may have been more politically powerful to keep the focus completely on Noem's bizarre and fascist comments in a civilized way, IMO.

      Delete
    3. You must always be civil, especially when fascists declare their intent to oust the duly elected governor and mayor of your state/city.

      Delete
    4. Civility is about preserving the credibility of dissent. Upholding democratic norms with civility strengthens, not weakens, the case against authoritarian overreach.

      Delete
    5. Ah yes, civility. That must how Prince Orange Chickenshit seized power, but his civility. He wipes his ass with our Constitution and then dares you to challenge him.

      Delete
    6. And you feel like it would be a good idea to seize power back in the same way as him?

      Delete
    7. Fuck you, 5:13. Is that what you think Padilla was doing? These people have active duty Marines patrolling the streets of his state. They don't take questions. They will not listen to the courts. They mock you as they answer your concerns with sneering contempt. Go enjoy your fucking military parade to honor the fucking Prince Orange Chickenshit's birthday tomorrow. I think I'll pass.

      Delete
    8. Sounds good. Have a good weekend.

      Delete
    9. No one is saying that Padilla needed to be civil, or a humble little Mexican. But his timing was completely off to just start yelling at her like that while she was speaking. It made his disruption the issue rather than her, and the response to him was standard Secret Service and FBI.

      Delete
    10. 12:08, this is absurd. I don't know if you have noticed but this authoritarian regime doesn't answer questions, civil or otherwise. They tell you and the judges to go fuck themselves.

      Delete
  15. The man that interrupted Goebbels that one time exercised “imperfect judgment.”

    ReplyDelete
  16. I hope no one exercises “imperfect judgment” during the upcoming protests.

    ReplyDelete
  17. Iran got lulled into believing TACO.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Um, Rubio declared that the US had nothing to do with the attacks.

      Delete
    2. TACO refers to Trump never following through on his harmful economic theories. No one doubts Trump would bomb the crap out of some 3rd world country that couldn't defend itself.

      But they don't tell you that on Fox, do they DiC?

      Delete
    3. Unfortunately Iran is pretty huge, has a better than average army, and has religious nutjobs stationed all over to fuck shit up.

      Delete
    4. I highly doubt that anyone believes Trump. But certainly it will serve the US foreign policy well to put an exclamation point on Trump's lying.
      Trump is all likelihood was clueless but is trying to save face now.

      Delete
    5. Look at Dickhead trying to make Prince Orange Chickenshit look good. He's such a transparent ass.

      Delete
  18. Law enforcement

    ReplyDelete
  19. They must have known who he was.

    ReplyDelete