WEDNESDAY: "Baghdad Bob," the honcho declared!

WEDNESDAY, MARCH 25, 2026

His statement was disappeared: What does an act of "sifting" look like? To answer your question, let's visit the first segment of yesterday's The Five

Co-host Dana Perino introduced the day's first topicand frankly, the co-host was suitably stunned. The program started like this

PERINO: (3/24/26): Hello, everyone. I'm Dana Perino, here with Kennedy, Jessica Tarlov, Jesse Watters and Greg Gutfeld. It's 5 o'clock in New York City, and this is The Five!

And a stunning divide here at home over who to believeTrump or Iran. The president says he's having productive negotiations with the terror regime on a deal to end the war, claiming Iran agreed to no nukes and even revealing that the Iranians sent a gift related to oil and gas. 

Who to believeTrump or Iran? There was a stunning divide! 

At this point, producers played tape of the president's public statements about the negotiations and about that "very big present," which he further described as "a very big prize." 

That said, who should you believe? Perino's intro continued: 

PERINO (continuing directly): Iranian officials are denying that negotiations are even happening, and some Democrats, including Barack Obama's former CIA director, appear to be more inclined to believe Iran over the president.  

To her credit, she didn't say Barack Hussein Obama!

"I tend to believe Iran more than I do Donald Trump," former director John Brennan was now shown saying, in a tightly edited video clip in which he seemed to be chuckling. There followed other tightly edited video clips in which Senators Van Hollen, Schiff and Schumer were not shown saying that they trust the Iranians more. 

What had these solons actually said? As is often the case when Fox presents tightly edited video clips, there was no obvious way to know. But what had been shown was "close enough for Fox News Channel work"was close enough to justify the shocking summary messaged on this chyron:

DEMS BELIEVE IRAN'S TERROR REGIME OVER TRUMP

With that, the program's viewers had been messaged. There was only one problem:

As we noted yesterday, one major figure from Fox's own Murdoch empire had made a tougher statement than anything Perino had shown on the screen. That major player was Gerard Baker, former editor-in-chief of the Wall Street Journal. He had punched hard, below the belt, in an X post which was featured in this report by Mediaite:

‘We Have Become Baghdad Bob’: Wall Street Journal Editor Delivers Stunning Condemnation of Trump 

Fox News contributor and former Wall Street Journal editor-in-chief Gerard Baker made a stunning comparison between President Donald Trump and an infamous propagandist for the late Iraqi dictator Saddam Hussein on Monday.

Baker, a familiar face on both Fox News and Fox Business as well as the editor-at-large of the Journal, made the comparison after Trump and the Iranian government made contrasting statements about negotiations that may or may not be taking place between the two parties. 

[...] 

Baker expressed more faith in the Iranians’ story than Trump’s.

“The unsettling reality is that with this president, Americans in wartime are in the unprecedented position of having to suspect that the enemy’s version of events is more likely to be true than our own,” he wrote shortly after the Iranians issued their denial. “We have become Baghdad Bob.”

Baker is still an editor-at-large over at the Journal. To see his latest weekly column for the Journal, you can just click here.

Also, he's a Fox News contributor! Did we forget to mention that?

That said, Oof! What Baker posted was much more cutting than anything Brennan or the three Democratic senators were shown to have said. In his post, he said that Trump has managed to turn the United States into the new Baghdad Bob! 

At the nation's top-rated "cable news" show, everyone knew how to handle this awkward state of affairs. Baker's assault was disappeared, as Perino smiled reassuringly. 

To see Baker's post, you can just click this. But, dear friends, please play by the rules:

In service to tribalized spotless minds, Please don't tell your Red American associates, neighbors and friends!


IMPRECATIONS: DefSec's warrior pastor speaks!

WEDNESDAY, MARCH 25, 2026

It has now come to this:  We'd planned to speak today about the recent murder of Stephanie Minter, age 41, in Fairfax County, Virginia. Also, about the recent murder of Sheridan Gorman, age 18, on the Chicago lakefront. 

Last night, on the Fox News Channel, Trace Gallagher alleged that CNN and MSNOW have refused to report or discuss these recent killings. We had planned to cite the tribal siftingsthe tribal evasionsinvolved in this state of affairs. 

We Blues! As the "democratization of media" has helped split this nation into warring tribes, we Blues have disappeared important news topics too! We had planned to go there todaybut thanks to Michael Luciano's report at Mediaite, we can tell you instead that it has now come to this

Hegseth’s Pastor Agrees With Interviewer Who Says ‘I Pray That God Kills’ Democratic Candidate

The pastor and spiritual adviser to Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth agreed with a podcaster’s wish that God kill state Rep. James Talarico (D-TX).

Brooks Potteiger is a pastor at Pilgrim Hill Reformed Fellowship, a church in the Nashville area that Hegseth attends. In August, Hegseth held a Christian religious service at the Pentagon, where Potteiger was invited to say a prayer.

Last Tuesday, Potteiger appeared on the Reformation Red Pill podcast, where host Joshua Haymes, who is also a member of Pilgrim Hill, made some astonishing remarks about Talarico. This month, Talarico won the Democratic nomination for U.S. Senate after having spoken openly about his Christian faith while also opposing Christian nationalism, to which Hegseth subscribes.

Just to be clear, we're speaking here about Secretary Hegseth's pastor, not about Secretary Hegseth himself. According to Luciano, that pastor agreed, on a recent podcast, with some "astonishing" remarks. 

With respect to those remarks, How astonishing were they? We'll offer a fuller transcript below, but here's what Luciano reported next: 

[continuing directly from above]
“I pray that God kills him,” Haymes said. “Ultimately, that means killing his heart and raising him up to new life in Christ.”

“Right,” Potteiger agreed. “We want him crucified with Christ.” 

It gets worse, as you can see below. But that's what Luciano reported. 

Luciano's report continues from there. We'll suggest that you read his report and look at the videotape it includes.

In our view, it's an important reporta report which helps capture what Plato once called "the [difficulty] of the time." 

At this site, we've been puzzled by Hegseth's demeanor ever since 2023. During that year, we started watching him on Fox & Friends Weekend

Again, it isn't Secretary Hegseth who made the remarks in question. But can a large, highly "diverse" modern nation expect to survive the "democratization" to which we've referred? 

In our view, the answer isn't clear. That said, here's a fuller chunk of the conversation which now sits out there on the web for anyone to be influenced by. 

The Christian pastors are talking about James Talarico, age 36, the Texas Senate nominee of whom they disapprove:

HAYMES (3/17/26): This is the kind of guy you pray imprecatory psalms against, and I mean that actually. First and foremost, we pray that a man like this will be cut to the heart. My wife and I were talking about this in the car the other day...

Public enemiesthese are the orcs at the gate. You are not called to love the barbarian horde that is planning to break into your city and, you know, pillage, plunder, rape and mutilate you and your people. You don't love that horde. That is your enemy, and this is where you have imprecatory psalms. This is where you pray, strongly. 

The Psalmist is not shy. "God, destroy them. Make them as dung on the ground," right?  Madison and I were talking about that...

I pray that God kills him. Ultimately, that means killing his heart and raising him up to new life in Christ. That's the first thing.

POTTEIGER: Right. We want him crucified with Christ. 

HAYMES: That's exactly right.

POTTEIGER: I want him to beSaul of Tarsus? Talarico of Tarsus! That's what I want. Who would say, "I was holding the garments while they stoned Stephen and now I'm the " Yeah! That's what we want.

HAYMES: Yes. We want death and new life, right? And if it would not be within God’s will to do so, stop him by any means necessary, O God! That’s why we pray imprecatory psalms, even in our Lord’s Day service. We're Whole Bible Christians, after all. 

Haymes and his wife had been talking about making the others as dung! At any rate, what's a "Whole Bible Christian?" 

With no disrespect intended, you'll have to Google that up. 

What did those Whole Bible believers literally mean by the various things they said? Each person can puzzle that out. But whatever these two Christians actually meant, we regard what they said as dangerous.

At any rate, that's a slightly larger chunk of what the two Christians said. It's now floating around on the web for everyone in the country to hear.

Regarding what we've transcribed, we'll note that it's Haymes who does most of the talking. But it's Potteiger, the DefSec's pastor, who provides some of the more colorful talk. 

Does Potteiger want the candidate killed, or does he want the candidate converted? We can't tell you how to read that. We can tell you this: 

On that same dayon Tuesday, March 17Greg Gutfeld and Emily Compagno engaged in dangerous secular talk concerning Talarico. They did so on our nation's most-watched "cable news" program, The Five

When they emitted some truly remarkable statements, no major figure in Blue America deigned to say a word. Over here in Blue America, our major news orgs have decided that the Fox News Channel doesn't even exist.

Rather plainly, The Five is a "news show" in name only. In reality, it's a propaganda / entertainment entitya dim-witted corporate messaging vehicle whose co-hosts may or may not be qualified to participate in an actual TV "news" program.

We Blues! The people we've been trained to trust won't report or discuss this ongoing situation. We'll guess that it's safer and easier to look awayto refuse to discuss the real world.

Tomorrow morning, bright and early, we'll show you what our cowardly kittens are choosing to enable. We'll transcribe the remarkable comments emitted by Gutfeld and Compagno.

We'll transcribe what the messengers said. All in all, the game works like this:

Silo Red cranks it out. Silo Blue runs off and hides!

Tomorrow: What the two messengers said


TUESDAY: Did anyone have the slightest idea...

TUESDAY, MARCH 24, 2026

...what Bessent was talking about? We've often cited "complexification" as one of the principal scourges of our failed or failing political culture. 

Thanks to "segregation by viewpoint," citizens tend to hear only one set of arguments, opinions and facts. They hear the claims which are preferred by their own tribal group, and they hear little else. 

But then, there's also the scourge of "complexification!" Consider what happened when Scott Bessent seemed to speak with Kristen Welker on Sunday's Meet the Press

Their imitation of conversation was quickly complexificated. Did anyone out in TV Land understand what the two were allegedly talking about? Also, who created more of the incoherence—Welker or Bessent?

We'll transcribe and you can decide. The policy discussion to which we refer started fairly early on, with Welker asking this

WELKER (3/22/26): All right. Let me talk about your announcement this past week. 

On Friday, the Treasury Department lifted sanctions on Iranian oil stored on tankers, a move that would effectively allow Iran to get more than $14 billion of oil revenue. Why is the U.S. helping to fund a country that it’s currently at war with, Mr. Secretary? 

Fellow citizens, tell the truth! At this point, were you already struggling to hold on? 

According to Welker, Treasury had lifted sanctions on Iranian oil—but apparently, only on Iranian oil which was "stored on tankers." 

We'll bite! Why would Iran be storing oil on tankers? We'll guess that few viewers knew. 

At any rate, Welker said this lifting of sanctions would allow Iran to score $14 billion. So why would the United States want to do such a thing? Bessent started like this: 

BESSENT (continuing directly): Again, Kristen, why don’t we have good facts here? That Iranian oil was always going to be sold to the Chinese. It was going to be sold at a discount. So which, which is better, Kristen? The uh, which is better? If oil prices spike to $150 and they were getting 70% of that? Or oil prices below $100? It’s better to have them where they are now. And to be clear, we had always planned for this contingency. 

Bessent wasn't finished at this point. By way of contrast, we'll guess that most viewers already were. 

For ourselves, we'll be honest. Already, we don't have the slightest idea how Bessent's reply connected to Welker's question. Nor do we have any clear understanding of what Bessent's statements actually meant. 

He said the oil in question—the oil which has been "stored on tankers"—was always going to be sold to China, presumably under terms of the pre-existing sanctions (whatever they were) or then again maybe not. Assuming that statement is accurate, he now seemed to say—several statistics were now flashed around—that Iran would gain less cash from the sale of the oil if the sanctions are lifted. 

Possibly, that would happen because the release of the oil in question was going to drive "oil prices" down. But we're basically guessing here. 

Is that what Bessent was saying? To be honest, we still have no clear idea, even two days later. That said, this initial statement by Bessent continued, with the stiff-necked secretary saying this:

BESSENT (continuing directly): About 140 million barrels are out on the water. In essence, we are Jiu-Jitsuing the Iranians. We are using their own oil against them. We have a much better line of sight, to be clear, at Treasury, when this oil goes to— If it goes to Indonesia, if it goes to Japan, if it goes to Korea, we have a much better line of sight and are able to block accounts that the oil goes into. 

When it goes into China it completely gets recycled. So to be clear, that 14 billion number is grossly overstated. 

In a word, NFI! Concerning the meaning of this continuation, we have No F**king Idea! 

Does that passage mean that the oil in question will now be sold to places other than China? That sounds like it might be what it means, as we carefully read the transcript today. But as we watched this answer fly by on Sunday, we had no freaking idea. 

As you can see, Bessent had thrown a puzzlement in at the end: 

"So to be clear," the gentleman said, possibly just to be ironic, "that 14 billion number is grossly overstated." 

We had (and have) no idea how that connected to anything Bessent had previously said. Welker may have been puzzled too. Possibly grasping at straws, she decided to say and ask this:

WELKER (continuing directly): Let me unpack what you’re just saying. First of all, how much is it? And second of all, I don’t hear you disputing that Iran will get some of the money. 

"How much is it?" Welker now said, seeming to refer to Bessent's claim that her initial $14 billion figure was just plain wrong, all wrong. She also seemed to ask why Iran should be getting any money at all from the sale of the oil. In the short run, the next few volleys went like this: 

BESSENT (continuing directly): Iran always—already gets a huge amount of the money because Iran is the largest sponsor of state terrorism and China has been funding them.

WELKER: So it was always part of the plan to un-sanction Iranian oil?

BESSENT: Again, we unsanctioned the— At Treasury, we plan for all contingencies. We have break-the-glass plans. And to be able— 

This water—this oil is floating out in Asia, and it is mostly our Asian allies—the U.S. gets virtually no oil from the Gulf. We are energy sufficient. So when we un-sanction this, rather than the oil going to China, it can go to Japan. It can go to Korea. It can go to Indonesia. It can go to Malaysia.

WELKER: And it can go to Iran too. I mean, isn’t the point that the sanctions were in place to prevent Iran from getting any of the money? They will have access to some of the money now.

BESSENT: No, again— Kristen, you’re missing the point. So, please listen to me. 

By now, the oil—or perhaps the water—was "floating out in Asia." Welker seemed to say that Iran might be able to sell some of its oil to itself!

"Kristen, you’re missing the point," Bessent said. "So, please listen to me." 

What he said about Welker might have been true (or not). But is there any reason to think that his proposed solution would have helped? 

As you can see in the Meet the Press transcript, this attempt at a policy chat continued at length from there, creating a type of "Who's on First" for the modern complexified age. 

There's absolutely nothing unusual about public "discussions" like this. This sort of thing has been the norm for decades now—and given the way we humans are wired, no one seems to notice or care. 

Our final query: 

Many people were watching at home. Did anyone have the slightest idea what these titans were talking about?


EVASION(S): Compagno agrees with what he said!

TUESDAY, MARCH 24, 2026

Our discourse is built on evasions: Starting at 6 o'clock sharp, the yukking-it-up was nearly general over today's Morning Joe.

In fairness, Joe Scarborough has crafted a program which, on balance and in our opinion, is the most intelligent cable news program in the American firmament. (All in all, we'd have to say that the competition isn't even real close.)

Still, there are times when the MoJo crew can't seem to help themselves. Life can still be highly enjoyable in a failing nation when you're paid an extremely high salary, and the recipients of those extremely large salaries sometimes just wanna have fun. 

In a curious way, it reminds us of Chekhov's descriptionadmittedly, in translationof the sexually promiscuous Gurov. The description is offered right at the start of Chekhov's greatest-story-ever-written candidate, The Lady with the Lapdog: 

At every new meeting with an attractive woman, he forgot all about [previous bitter] experience, he wanted to enjoy life so much, and it all seemed so simple and amusing.

He wanted to enjoy life so much! Gurov changes as this widely praised story unfoldsbut every once in a while, the high-end gaggle on Morning Joe seems to forget about the situation we all find ourselves in. 

On such occasions, they chuckle and joke and gambol and play. If only for one brief shining moment, it all seems so simple and amusing! 

Yesterday morning, out in reality, we spoke about a pitiful "sifting" which took place on Sunday morning's Fox & Friends Weekend program.  

One of the friends, Charlie Hurt, had been tasked with reporting a death. Semi-comically, this is what he said:

HURT (3/22/26): Former FBI director and special counsel Robert Mueller, who led the 2016 election interference probe tied to Russia, has died. His family releasing a statement, writing, quote, "With deep sadness, we are sharing the news that Bob passed away. His family asks that their privacy be respected." 

Former President George W. Bush, who nominated Mueller, says he is deeply saddened by the loss and praised him for his service to the country, writing, quote, "Bob transitioned the agency mission to protecting the homeland after September 11. He led it effectively, helping prevent another terrorist attack on U.S. soil."

While a cause of death has not been released, Mueller battled Parkinson's for several years, He was 81 years old. 

Addressing Red American viewers, Hurt reported what a former president had said about Mueller's death. But in his statementpresumably, it had been crafted by unnamed producers--he sifted out the highly unusual thing the current president had said!

Is something "wrong" with that current presidentsomething which may even be dangerous? Red and Blue elites alike have agreed that we must never ask! 

Blue news orgs won't ask that question. On Red news orgs, we're told that the sitting president is so spectacularly competent thataccording to Greg Gutfeld's repeated bumper stickerwe citizens "don't deserve him."

(When Gutfeld emits that bromide, he means it as a compliment to the sitting presidentto the person who made that highly unusual remark about Mueller's death.)

Needless to say, that president has made other highly unusual comments in recent days. On Fox, they send waves of messenger children onto the air to disappear these unusual commentsor, on the rare occasion, to affirm the highly unusual things the sitting commander has said. 

Sometimes, the co-hosts affirm the highly unusual statements! So it was that Emily Compagno made the statement we've transcribed below on yesterday's edition of The Five

We have no doubt that Compagno was completely sincere in what she said. But to ask a slightly awkward question, in what universe should she be serving as a co-host of our failing nation's most-watched "cable news" program? 

That's a slightly awkward question! At any rate, last evening, on The Five, after a somewhat jumbled prologue, here's what Compagno said:  

COMPAGNO (3/23/26): You know, Trump called the Democrat [sic] Party "America's greatest enemy." And I agreeand how can you not, watching that? 

It was "the enemy within" all over again!  Compagno said she agreed with the president's statement! How can you not, she aked!

(For the record, Compagno was referring to the situation in which TSA workers are currently showing up for work but aren't getting paid.) 

At present, TSA workers aren't getting paid in a timely fashion. (They'll be reimbursed later on.)  Watching that ongoing situationfailing to mention President Trump's emerging role in this situationCompagno said the sitting president had been right when he offered this highly unusual Truth Social post:

Truth Details 

Donald J. Trump
@realDonaldTrump 

Now with the death of Iran, the greatest enemy America has is the Radical Left, Highly Incompetent, Democrat [sic] Party! Thank you for your attention to this matter. President DJT 

As we noted yesterday, the president posted that assessment as the weekend ended. Yesterday, on our most-watched "cable news" show, Compagno said she agreed with that highly unusual statement.

"How can you not?" she asked! 

On Sunday, the three friends had disappeared something the president said. On Monday, Compagno repeated this other highly unusual comment, then said she can't imagine how anyone could fail to agree with the president's remark. 

Full disclosure! Over the weekend, we went looking for the real Emily Compagno. We were surprised by the number of interview / profiles we found online, though we won't tell you what they said.

Compagno frequently laughs and smiles. We have no doubt that she's fully sincere. But should she be positioned as co-host on our nation's most-watched news show?

Given the ethos of this failing nation, it's an awkward question you ask!

Yesterday, Red American viewers were shielded from another unusual comment. This comment came from Gerard Baker, former editor-in-chief of the Murdoch empire's Wall Street Journal.

Under the reign of President Trump. "we [Americans] have become Baghdad Bob," Baker had rather remarkably said. That comment wasn't repeated on The Five. It was sifteddisappeared. 

Red American viewers were shielded from the difficulty of knowing what Baker had said. For Mediaite's report about Baker's remarks, you can just click here.

Information can be siftedcan be disappeared. Highly significant, basic news topics can also be disappeared. 

We Blues have frequently disappeared major topics over the past several years. We'll touch on that awkward matter tomorrow. For today, we'll close with one more fact about Compagno.

One week ago, on the March 17 edition of The Five, the gang pretended to discuss James Talarico. Even by the standards of this clownish imitation of a "cable news" program, the comments were hard to believe.

Gutfeld said he was "getting Ted Bundy vibes" from the Texas Senate candidate, Compagno then compared Talarico to a pair of religious cult leaders, including David Koresh of Branch Davidian / Waco fame.

Can a society expect to survive when its discourse functions this way? We plan to transcribe those comments on Thursday morning. But for today, we'll tell you this:

Those astounding comments have gone unmentioned in Blue America. So too with the astounding bogus claims made on March 3astoundingly bogus claims made by all the messenger children, from Kat Timpf and Gutfeld on down.

In Blue America, our orgs don't want to ask if something is "wrong" with the sitting American president. Those orgs also prefer to pretend that the powerful Fox News Channel doesn't even exist.

As in The Sixth Sense, so too here? Has a society already died when its major orgs function this way?

Tomorrow, we'll talk about one of Blue America's major evasions. On Thursday, we'll force ourselves to transcribe what the co-hosts said about Talarico. Sic semper "news shows" like this!

Gurov emerges profoundly changed. Is it already too late for us? We'll type and let you decide!

Tomorrow: Major Blue evasion


MONDAY: Does Silo Blue ever "sift" the news?

MONDAY, MARCH 23, 2026

We'd say the answer is yes: The president's erratic behavior has continued all through this day. That said, we want to explore the claim that news orgs in Blue America may sometimes "sift" the news. 

For the record, what happens when a news org "sifts" the newswhen a news org engages in selective reporting? For starters, such news orgs may report the facts which align with preferred tribal storylines, while possibly failing to report other relevant facts which don't. 

In this morning's report, we discussed a fairly obvious bit of "sifting" by the Fox News Channelmore specifically, by the trio of friends who co-host the four-hour morning show, Fox & Friends Weekend. Now, let's turn to the corresponding news report in yesterday's New York Times.

We refer to yesterday's front-page report about the death of Robert Mueller. The lengthy reportessentially, it was an obituarywas written by Tim Weiner, a former national security correspondent for the Times and a highly regarded, best-selling author. 

For starters, credit where due:

In our view, the New York Times frequently tends to disappear the many borderline crazy statements the sitting president posts on Truth Social. In our view, this seems like a way of avoiding the need to report on a very important topicthe possible state of the sitting president's mental / emotional / cognitive health. 

In this case, credit where due! In this case, the president's "jaw-dropping" post about Mueller's death was not disappeared by the Times. Headline included, Weiner's report started like this: 

Robert S. Mueller III, 81, Dies; Rebuilt F.B.I. and Led Trump Inquiry

Robert S. Mueller III, who led the Federal Bureau of Investigation for 12 tumultuous years, brought politically explosive indictments as a special counsel examining Russia’s attack on the 2016 presidential election, and then concluded that he could neither absolve nor accuse President Trump of a crime, died on Friday. He was 81.

His family confirmed the death in a statement but did not say where he died or specify the cause. Last August, the family disclosed publicly that Mr. Mueller was diagnosed with Parkinson’s disease in the summer of 2021. The law firm WilmerHale, from which Mr. Mueller retired in 2022, said he died on Friday night in Charlottesville, Va.

Mr. Trump remained unforgiving of Mr. Mueller’s investigation even after Mr. Mueller’s death. On learning of it on Saturday, the president posted on Truth Social: “Good, I’m glad he’s dead. He can no longer hurt innocent people!”

Credit where due! On Fox, the highlighted statement had been disappeared. On this occasion, the New York Times sought safety in no such avoidance. 

On the other hand, it had initially seemed to us that yesterday's Times report glossed the facts, in a familiar way, about the last major assignment of Mueller's career. We refer to Mueller's work, alluded to above, "as special counsel in a case where the chief subject of the investigation was the president of the United States." 

Did the Times report gloss some facts about that matter? Weiner's account of the "Mueller report" started off like this: 

The final 448-page report went to [Bill] Barr, who by then was the attorney general, on March 22, 2019. Mr. Mueller had trusted Mr. Barr, his longtime colleague and a family friend, to deliver its conclusions, unvarnished, to the American people. He would be sorely disappointed.

The report concluded that Russia had systemically sought to help Mr. Trump win the election, and that the candidate and his campaign had encouraged their clandestine assistance. It laid out 10 cases in which the president and his aides had sought to impede the F.B.I. investigation. Its key passage read: “While this report does not conclude that the President committed a crime, it also does not exonerate him.” 

But the attorney general, while keeping the text of the report secret, ostensibly to redact sensitive information, announced only that “the Special Counsel’s investigation is not sufficient to establish that the President committed an obstruction-of-justice offense.” 

Mr. Trump proclaimed that he had been “totally exonerated.” 

Yesterday, it seemed to us that this passage glossed the facts of this matter. Today, after rereading that part of the Times report, we're still puzzled by what it says. 

As you can see, the passage says that AG Barr failed to include the "key passage" in the Mueller report when he "announced" the statement quoted above, apparently on March 24, 2019. Here's the problem: 

On that same day, Barr sent a four-page letter about the Mueller report to the relevant congressional committees. Its contents were reported by the New York Times that very dayand in the relevant part of the letter, Barr instantly quoted the "key passage" which he supposedly didn't "announce."

Here's the relevant New York Times report. (Headline: "Mueller Finds No Trump-Russia Conspiracy, but Stops Short of Exonerating President on Obstruction.") The report appeared on the front page of the Times on March 25, 2019, with an online link to the four-page letter

The "key passage" quoted by Weiner was instantly cited in that Times report. Unless we misunderstand what Weiner was saying, that "key passage" in the Mueller report was hardly a secret.

We're sorry now that we ever mentioned this (dated) topic this morning. In all honesty, we now have no idea what Weiner and his editors meant by the passage we've posted. 

That said:

Back in real time, we Blues were sure that President Trump surely had to have committed obstruction of justice. From that day right on through yesterday, it has always seemed to us that we Blues proceeded to overstate the degree of perfidy attributable to Barr, in precisely the way yesterday's report seems to have revived.

What were Weiner and his editors referring to in the passage we've posted? At this point, we don't know. But tribal grievances never die in highly tribalized times like these. That fact is put on display every day of the week on the Fox News Channel's highest-rated programs.

We're sorry we brought this up. But yesBlue orgs, like their Red counterparts, do sometimes "sift" the news. They sometimes report the facts they like while omitting the facts they don't.

As seen on yesterday's Fox & Friends Weekend, Fox News is clownishly sunk in this practice. We'll be exploring such behaviors all week.

In conclusion: In conclusion, credit where due! The New York Times reported the sitting president's extremely strange Truth Social post about Robert Mueller's death! 

All too often (in our view), the timorous newspaper fails to report such potentially worrying conduct by the sitting president.


SIFTING(S): The sitting president said he was glad!

MONDAY, MARCH 23, 2026

Fox News disappeared what he said: On this campus, we almost never post on Sundays. For that reason, the intrepid Joe DePaolo beat us to the story. 

We'd seen it happen in real time, early Sunday morning. Over at Mediaite, DePaolo reported the sifting of information Fox News engineered. 

Indeed, DePaolo went well beyond what we ourselves had seen. Under a somewhat colorful headline, his report started like this:

Fox News Completely Ignores Trump’s Bonkers Statement on Mueller’s Death On Air

President Donald Trump’s shocking post celebrating the death of former FBI Director Robert Mueller has not received a single on-air mention over at Fox News.

According to a search using the media monitoring service Snapstream, Fox News has not mentioned the president’s statement a single time on its air since Mueller’s passing on Saturday.

“Good, I’m glad he’s dead,” Trump wrote on Truth Social Saturday afternoon. “He can no longer hurt innocent people!” 

That jaw-dropping postscript on the life of a decorated public servant has received nary a mention on air at Fox News. The network’s chief political analyst Brit Hume did denounce Trump’s comments in a post on X. And other network contributors have—in social media posts—similarly condemned Trump’s remarks. The network also did cover Trump’s remarks on its website, and in an X post on the Fox News account, But that criticism has not been seen by Fox News viewers. And viewers haven’t heard about Trump’s words at all.

The sitting president had made a "jam-dropping" statement about Mueller's death. But according to DiPaolo's research, viewers of the Fox News Channel hadn't heard about that at all!

At this point, the story gets even betteror you might say it gets even worse.

As DiPaolo continued, he reported what viewers had heard about Mueller's death on Sunday morning's Fox & Friends Weekend broadcast.  On this campus, we ourselves had seen that carefully sifted report. 

The report was delivered by Charlie Hurt at 6:23 a.m. This is what we saw him say:

HURT (3/22/26): Former FBI director and special counsel Robert Mueller, who led the 2016 election interference probe tied to Russia, has died. His family releasing a statement, writing, quote, "With deep sadness, we are sharing the news that Bob passed away. His family asks that their privacy be respected." 

Former President George W. Bush, who nominated Mueller, says he is deeply saddened by the loss and praised him for his service to the country, writing, quote, "Bob transitioned the agency mission to protecting the homeland after September 11. He led it effectively, helping prevent another terrorist attack on U.S. soil."

While a cause of death has not been released, Mueller battled Parkinson's for several years, He was 81 years old. 

That was Hurt's full statement. The three friends engaged in no further discussion of Mueller's death. 

Indeed, searching the Internet Archive records, we find no sign that Mueller was ever mentioned again during Sunday's four-hour broadcast. And yes, we ourselves were struck by the apparent "sifting" Fox producers had performed in fashioning the text which Hurt faithfully read.

As you may know, Fox & Friends Weekend is co-hosted by a trio of friends. They're very friendly with each otherand they're especially friendly with respect to the sitting president. 

Indeed, almost everyone at the Fox News Channel is very favorably disposed toward the sitting president (as is their perfect right). This helps explain the sifting of information seen in Hurt's brief report. 

In his statement, Hurt reported that Mueller had diedand he reported what one former president had said. But as DiPaolo noted, Hurt didn't report what the current sitting presidentthe person who's actually president nowhad said! 

Even by Sunday morning, that "bonkers" statement by the sitting president had become the subject of a great deal of critical comment. 

Indeed, it was just as DiPaolo reported. Early Saturday afternoon, in one of his endless Truth Social posts, this is what he had said:

Truth Details 

Donald J. Trump
@realDonaldTrump 

Robert Mueller just died. Good, I’m glad he’s dead. He can no longer hurt innocent people! President DONALD J. TRUMP 

By most peoples' reckoning, there he had gone once again! Unless you were watching Fox & Friends Weekend, where the unusual statement was sifted outwent completely unmentioned in Charlie Hurt's brief report.

Viewers were told what former president George W. Bush had said, but those same viewers weren't told what President Trump had said. His highly unusual statement was lovingly disappearedwas sifted, was edited out.

We're heavily working the term "sifted" today. We'll be using that term all this week. It refers to the highly selective way citizens are exposed to information and opinion under current arrangements, in which Silo Red and Silo Blue are the sources of large volumes of our journalismof our public discourse.

Some news reports come from Silo Blue. Some come from Silo Redand very rarely shall the twain meet. In this instance, the Fox News Channel had chosen to disappear the latest thing the sitting president had said.

In fairness, selective "sifting" of information works in various ways. The New York Times has also been inclined to disappear the sitting president's strangest remarks, though the paper didn't do so in this particular case.

We'll document that this afternoon. For now, we'll stop with this:

The president's "bonkers" comment about Robert Mueller was soon joined by another Truth Social post. In our view, this later post by the sitting president was even more "jaw-dropping:" 

Truth Details 

Donald J. Trump
@realDonaldTrump 

Now with the death of Iran, the greatest enemy America has is the Radical Left, Highly Incompetent, Democrat [sic] Party! Thank you for your attention to this matter. President DJT

For the ten millionth time, there he had gone again! The Democrat [sic] Party is this nation's greatest enemy, the sitting American president remarkably said.

(For Mediaite's report on that astonishing comment, you can just click here.)

Almost surely, that astonishing comment by the president won't be mentioned on Fox News. As of now, the astonishing comment hasn't been reported by the New York Times, according to the Times search engine.

Discussion of the president's possible medical condition is scrupulously avoided by the Times. We live in a very dangerous timea time when the sifting of information of information is general over this failing nation.

The sifting is general over the nation. As we'll note, sifted news emerges from Silo Blue as well as from Silo Red.

Coming soon, perhaps tomorrow: What Gutfeld, Compagno said

SATURDAY: Mayor Mamdani spoke with Nawaz!

SATURDAY, MARCH 21, 2026

You know it when you see it: "Presidential timber" is hard to find. You know it when see you see it. 

There are one hundred United States senators. Within the political realm, they're all extremely high achievers. 

Very few of them are real presidential timber. We don't mean that as a criticism.

Last night, we were surprised to see that elusive quality right there on our TV screen. We saw it in someone who's only 34 years old. 

By law, he can't ever run for president. We were surprised to see it, but there it was, unmistakably, right there on the screen.

Amna Nawaz conducted the interview for the PBS NewsHour. The first exchange went like this

NAWAZ (3/20/26): Mr. Mayor, welcome to the News Hour. Thanks for making the time. 

MAYOR MAMDANI: Absolutely. Thank you so much for being here.  

NAWAZ: So let's talk a little bit about your first few months in office. You really had to hit the ground running. You had a lot coming at you too. You had a major nurses strike to handle, a record-breaking snowstorm.

I know you have probably heard the difference between campaigning in poetry, governing in prose. Does that bring true to you? Have you found that to be true?  

MAYOR MAMDANI: I think there's still a little poetry in the day-to-day. I think it's important that we don't let our imagination become constrained by what we are inheriting.

Mamdani's term as mayor on New York could always turn out badly. Also, because he was born in Uganda, he can't ever run for the White House.

That said, you know it when you see it! The smile, the poetry, the look to the future? We were surprised to see that all the key timber was there.

Elsewhere, possibly not so much! Tens of millions of fellow citizens will disagree, but this is the way Chris Hayes began Thursday night's All In program:

HAYES (3/19/26): Good evening from New York. I'm Chris Hayes. 

You know, every once in a while, you just have to remind yourself that the president of the United States is a sociopathor at the very least, being charitable here, he just can't help himself from acting like one.

And that's particularly relevant right now as the man is directing the military might of this nation in yet another war in the Middle East, and that is not going well.  

Is the current sitting president a "likely sociopath?" Hayes floated that notion at least six times as his monologue continued. 

As we've noted, "sociopath" isn't a clinical term. Beyond that, we'd prefer to see this question discussed by (carefully chosen) medical specialistsand we'd rather see any such affliction portrayed as a deeply unfortunate (though dangerous) illness, not as a source of insult or denigration.  

That said, that's where Hayes began on Thursday night. Real Clear Politics transcribed the first several minutes of what he said. You can see fuller videotape at the All In site.

Beyond all that, we're forced to report that Greg Gutfeld, 61 years old, fell off the wagon again last night. For whatever reason, there he went again, opening his program on the Fox News Channel with a "joke" in which he compared Joy Behar to "a hippo." 

Soon thereafter, things got substantially worse. We remain amazed but instructed by the fact that no major journalist in the Blue American firmament thinks this endless cultural swill is worth reporting or discussing. 

Our big Blue stars let this garbage. Our Blue stars, and our Blue orgs, just plainly don't seem to care

Now for the latest postponement! We're going to wait until next week to show you what Gutfeld and Emily Compagno said about James Talarico on Tuesday's edition of The Five

Can Talarico win the Texas Senate seat? We have no idea! But it should have been shocking to see him instantly compared, on the grisly Fox News Channel, to Ted Bundy and David Koresh. 

It should have been shockingbut by now it almost wasn't. 

"At long last," do the people who run that imitation news channel "have left no sense of decency?" And how about the finer people who agree to avert their gaze from this swill?

We'll turn to one quick Q-and-A from last evening's NewsHour. As a bit of background, Amna Nawaz was born and raised in the state of Virginia, the daughter of South Asian immigrants:

NAWAZ: I have to ask you about your family before I let you go, because I think anyone familiar with the specific and what I would say very fortunate experience of being raised by Desi parents, South Asian parents, especially those with the courage and the hope to forge an entirely new life in new nations, you know that you can learn a lot from them.

MAYOR MAMDANI: Yes.

So the mayor said. We thought of that favorite passage from My Antoniathe passage in which Willa Cather's gender-switched narrator is discussing the Nebraska "immigrant girls" for whom Cather, in real life, had a lifelong high regard:

My Antonia: Book II, Section IX

There was a curious social situation in Black Hawk. All the young men felt the attraction of the fine, well-set-up country girls who had come to town to earn a living, and, in nearly every case, to help the father struggle out of debt, or to make it possible for the younger children of the family to go to school.

Those girls had grown up in the first bitter-hard times, and had got little schooling themselves. But the younger brothers and sisters, for whom they made such sacrifices and who have had ‘advantages,’ never seem to me, when I meet them now, half as interesting or as well educated. The older girls, who helped to break up the wild sod, learned so much from life, from poverty, from their mothers and grandmothers; they had all, like Ántonia, been early awakened and made observant by coming at a tender age from an old country to a new.

They had learned so much from poverty! Has a more beautifully crafted statement ever been placed in print?

And yes, we'll admit it again. Yesterday, we took Francine Prose's book to the medical mission, where there's a lot of sitting around. 

We hadn't reread it in several years. We could spend weeks writing about every page in the parts of the book where Prose discusses who the real Anne Frank actually was:

("A demanding and often sickly baby, Anne grew into a challenging child—mercurial, moody, humorous, alternately outgoing and shy." Also, though, a much-loved, precocious child who was a gifted, determined young writer.)

Also, the parts of the book in which in which Prose discusses the remarkably complex way Anne Frank's famous book actually came to be written. 

Also, the part of the book in which Prose describes the serendipity thanks to which the famous writing in question wasn't carried away and discarded by the people who arrested Anne Frank, along with her parents and her older sister, Margot Frank. (Only her father survived.)

Postponing the torture of transcribing the latest statements of the Fox News Channel Two, we'll leave you today with Prose's description of the one tiny bit of film which remainsa piece of film which can be seen, even today, right there for the whole world to see on YouTube:

A FLICKER of a home movie. June 22, 1941. The whole thing lasts ten seconds.

The bicycles slipping by provide the only indication that we are in Holland. The brick Merwedeplein apartment block looks more like married students’ housing on an American state university campus than the quaint center-city canal houses we associate with Amsterdam.

The camera waits outside a door, peering up a stairwell. In search of something to focus on, it pans up the side of a building. In the open windows are neighborhood residents, girls and young women, their elbows propped on the sills, waiting. The women at the windows alter the look of the street, so the scene begins to look more like a village in southern Europe.

The newlywed couple appears, arm in arm, the groom in a top hat, cane, and formal wear, the bride in a flattering pale suit, a jaunty white fedora, and gloves; she carries a bouquet. They walk down the stairs and pause like movie stars obliging the paparazzi. Passersby lean against their bicycles, staring.

Suddenly, the camera zooms toward the sky and finds Anne Frank, watching from her window. She turns and speaks to someone inside the apartment. She looks back at the couple, then away. The camera appears to lose interest. It glances at a few more spectators, then returns to the Amsterdam street.

On the Web site for the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum, you can watch those few seconds of Anne on film, in blurred and grainy close-up. Anne’s body language is quick, electric. A breeze, or maybe the motion of her body, lifts her hair as she turns, and her eyes smudge into dark ovals as she gazes down at the bridal couple.

As familiar as we are with images of Anne Frank, as inured as we may think we are to the sight of her beautiful face, the film pierces whatever armor we imagine we have developed. It is always shockingly short and always the same, and yet you are never entirely sure what you have, or haven’t, seen. It’s less like watching a film clip than like having one of those dreams in which you see a long-lost loved one or friend. In the dream, the person isn’t really dead. You must have been mistaken. You wake up, and it takes a few moments to understand why the dream was so cruelly deceptive.

We're with Prose every word of the way. We regard that as sacred film, sacred film of a sacred being.

Anne Frank is so viewed in certain cultures around the world. But what could possibly make us think that she was, or that she is, some sort of "sacred being?"

We'll admit that you're asking a very good question. You know it when you see it, we'll thoughtfully say. Though we don't see it much around here!

For today, we chose to stay with Prose and Anne Frank. Ted Bundy, David Koresh?  

Fellow citizens, thank you for asking! We'll present that disaster next week, Blue American silence included.


FRIDAY: Anne Frank, plus two others!

FRIDAY, MARCH 20, 2026

What Yevtushenko said: When we drop in at the medical mission, we treat it as a reading experience. (There tends to be a lot of sitting around.)

Today, we turned to the book we couldn't find a few weeks ago, and we pondered a present-day problem. We're forced to admit a semi-embarrassing fact:

By our reckoning, that book still strikes us as possibly the most interesting book we've ever read. 

Your reaction won't likely be the same. Be that as it may, the volume in question is this:

Anne Frank:
The Book, the Life, the Afterlife

By Francine Prose
HarperCollins Publishers, 2009

We know, we knowwe're wearing you out! That said, Prose began her text with this quotation from John Berryman, who was no one's idea of a dummy:

I would call the subject of Anne Frank’s Diary even more mysterious and fundamental than St. Augustine’s, and describe it as the conversion of a child into a person….

That brief clip comes from Berryman's 1967 essay, The Development of Anne Frank. 

This morning, when we read that opening line, we thought of two present day persons. We thought of the people who, just this past week, sat on our nation's most-watched "cable news" program and proceeded to compare James Talarico, first to a well-known deranged mass murderer, then to the apparently deluded leader of a religious cult.

(The first person said that Talarico gives him "Ted Bundy vibes." The second person called Talarico "a terrifying child," then compared him to David Koresh.)

What makes someone a person? Tomorrow, we'll offer transcripts of the fuller remarks by those two present-day people.

Prose's book still sweeps us away. So does the silence of Blue America's AWOL elitesthe silence we've often mentioned.

As Prose begins to write in her own voice, she offers this:

The first time I read The Diary of Anne Frank I was younger than its author was when, at the age of thirteen, she began to write it... 

In the summer of 2005, I read the diary once more. I had just begun making notes for a novel that, I knew, would be narrated in the voice of a thirteen-year-old girl. Having written a book suggesting that writers seek guidance from a close and thoughtful reading of the classics, I thought I should follow my own advice, and it occurred to me that the greatest book ever written about a thirteen-year-old girl was Anne Frank's diary.

Prose moves on (and on) from there, with the astounding back-story of a very well-known unknown book and its precocious young author, who was actually fifteen when her project was stopped.

What does that have to do with those other two people? We won't try to answer that question.

Tomorrow, we'll record what those two people actually said. Along the way, we urge you to remember this:

No people are uninteresting.

So Yevtushenko said.


BREAKING: Cleaning out the pasture spring!

FRIDAY, MARCH 20, 2026

Bundy, Koresh to follow: As it happens, we're going out to clean the pasture spring, or something very much like it

We may offer a post in mid-afternoon. But it's back to the slag heap tomorrow!

Tomorrow: "Ted Bundy vibes," one messenger said. "David Koresh," said another!


THURSDAY: The fact that this conduct takes place is news!

THURSDAY, MARCH 19, 2026

It should be reported as such: Here at the heart of this sprawling campus, we'd like to see Jessica Grose sign up with her local cable provider. 

After that, we'd like to see her start watching the Fox News Channel. We derive this desire from her latest column for the New York Times. 

Headline included, the column starts like this:

The Manosphere Continues to Devolve

In the new documentary “Inside the Manosphere,” the English filmmaker and host Louis Theroux describes the buff, screen-addled U.S. and British influencers he interviews as creators of “the new world of men who are redefining what it means to be a man.” But I came away from the movie, now on Netflix, thinking that it eclipsed this framing.

Young men may finally be waking up to the utter emptiness of the manosphere’s messaging.

So begins Grose's new columnor is it really a "subscriber-only newsletter?" Until today, we had never tried to puzzle it out, and the arcana of that other sprawling enterprise can sometimes be overwhelming.

That said, Grose has been at her desk "for Opinion" since 2021, and her latest offering is about the manosphere. As to what that sprawling entity is, she is soon offering this:

[continuing directly
The manosphere—a loose collection of male podcasters and social media stars who push misogynistic and ultraconservative views—is not new. The term is at least 15 years old and rose to a frequent topic of mainstream discourse during Donald Trump’s first presidential term.

The men Theroux interviews are pushing some of the oldest grifts and ancient hatreds in the book, even if they’ve been using new technology to beam those views out to a global audience. The creators Theroux follows—young men with handles like HSTikkyTokky and Sneako—share very familiar ideas of what it means to be a man, ones that predated the rise of social media: making money, having big muscles, driving expensive cars and sleeping with as many women as possible. Though Theroux does not talk to Andrew or Tristan Tate, the most prominent modern manosphere influencers, clips of the Tate brothers appear throughout the film. 

Superficially, these men are selling their audiences bizarre and extremist ideas—women shouldn’t vote; covering one eye in a photograph is a reference to a satanic plot—against the backdrop of the babes and Lamborghinis they “possess.” There’s a whole section of the documentary in which it seems every conversation Theroux has devolves into an antisemitic conspiracy theory involving the Rothschilds, citing “the Jews” who control the one world government or the media or Theroux himself. These specific conspiracy theories have been appearing in pamphlets—the old-timey version of viral videos—since the 19th century.

It’s unclear if any of the men actually believe what they say, or if they’re just shouting the most outrageous nonsense possible in order to maintain the attention of their audiences and get a rise out of Theroux and other spectators. They are quite self-aware about their place in the attention economy. “If I’d just done good things, I would never have really blown up on social media in the first place,” one of the men tells Theroux.

Sic semper the so-called manosphere. Grose goes on to suggest that the influence of this unfortunate movement is lessening. Recalling President Kennedy in Berlin, we'll only say this about that:

Let her come to the world of cable TV and watch the Fox News Channel!

In short, we're begging Grose to extend her range beyond the realm of "male podcasters and social media stars." We're asking her to acquire rights to the "new technology" now dominated by the Fox News Channel. 

If it's grifts she wants to cover, we're hoping she'll fire up the cable and watch several of that outfit's most-watched "cable news" showsand that she'll then report the gruesome behavior she sees.

We've been waiting for Godot to do thatrather, we've been waiting for Kristof and Brooks and Stephens and Cottle and for someone, anyone, who's typing for The Atlantic.

(Helen Lewis, across the pond, please come on over and down!)

Mutts like them will never do it! Perhaps a relative newcomer will.

If Grose accepts this cable news challenge, she'll be arriving on the scene a bit late. Pete Hegseth is gone from Fox & Friends Weekend, where he co-hosted with Rachel and Will right through the last election. 

He's now at the Pentagon, where he has, among other things, commissioned "a controversial pastor who supports repealing women’s right to vote" (see above!) to lead a worship service.

In our view, people are free to believe what they believe, even including what they believe about gender relations. Borrowing from Lincoln, "it may seem strange" to think that women should be denied the right to vote, "but let us judge not, that we be not judged."

(Full disclosure: Lincoln himself may have been a bit late to the game regarding the suffrage question.)

At any rate, even if Hegseth is gone from Fox, more virulent purveyors remain. Having abandoned our faith in Godot, we turn our eyes toward Grose.

At this point, we're going to try to restrict ourselves to purely descriptive language:

Each night, they pry the lid off the can at Fox and the swill comes slithering out. The Blue old liners at the Times refuse to report and discuss this remarkable fact. We're hoping a relative newcomer willbut also, with luck, Michelle Goldberg!

Whatever you think of the conduct in question, the fact that this conduct takes place is news! It should be reported, discussed.


BATTLES: The battles are fought by people like these!

THURSDAY, MARCH 19, 2026

Gutfeld's medical specialists: James Talarico is 36. If anything, he may look somewhat younger.  

Adjusting for age, he strikes us as an obvious high achiever. Yesterday, we turned to the leading authority on his career for this assortment of basics

James Talarico

James Dell Talarico (born May 17, 1989) is an American politician, Presbyterian seminarian, and former educator who has served since 2018 as a member of the Texas House of Representatives. Talarico is the Democratic nominee for the 2026 U.S. Senate election in Texas...

Talarico graduated from the University of Texas at Austin with a Bachelor of Arts in government. He later joined Teach For America, where he taught sixth-grade English language arts in San Antonio. Afterward, he served as the Central Texas executive director for Reasoning Mind, a nonprofit focused on bringing technology to low-income classrooms. He later graduated from Harvard University with a Master of Education degree in education policy.

Talarico serves as vice chair of two bodies in the Texas House: the Trade, Workforce, and Economic Development Committee and the Subcommittee on Academic and Career-Oriented Education under the Public Education Committee. He also serves on the Public Education Committee and the House Administration Committee. 

[...]

Talarico's maternal grandfather was a Baptist preacher in South Texas who Talarico says taught him that Christianity "is a simple—though not easy—religion, rooted in two commandments: 'Love God and love your neighbor.' " 

At age 36, Talarico "is the Democratic nominee for the 2026 U.S. Senate election in Texas!" Like President Clinton before himThey rarely voted for me, but you'll never meet a finer bunch of people than the Arkansas Pentecostalshe knows how to talk about Christianity, as a Democrat, to a southern red state audience. 

At age 36, he's the Democratic nominee for the Texas Senate seat! We'll take it as obvious that certain Red American elites are afraid he could possibly win. 

We don't know if Talarico really can possibly win. That said, we'll take it as obvious that such fears explain what happened on Tuesday's edition of The Five, where the candidate was compared first to a deranged mass murderer / sexual pervert, then to the lunatic leader(s) of one or two lunatic cults. 

Those astounding comparisons were given voice by a pair of people we regard as rather strangeby Greg Gutfeld, age 61, but also by Emily Compagno, age 46. 

In the main, we're inclined to regard Gutfeld and Compagno as corporate messenger children for the profit-seeking Fox News Channel. Setting that impression aside, we'll offer this assessment with a high degree of confidence: 

Judged by any traditional standard, Gutfeld and Compagno belong on this nation's most-watched "cable news" program in much the way we should be hired as artistic director for Moscow's Bolshoi Ballet. 

We don't think they belong in their posts; others find their behaviors refreshing. Today, let's offer two quick examples of what those behaviors tend to be. 

Quickly, we'll start with the Christianity. Concerning the southern border, Talarico said this in a Democratic debate back at the start of the year: 

So, my family is from the border. My mom grew up in Laredo, Texas. I feel like Texans understand this issue of immigration more so than people in other states, because we live with it, both the benefits and the challenges. 

So, what I have said is that our southern border should be like our front porch. There should be a giant welcome mat out front and a lock on the door.

We can welcome immigrants who want to live the American dream, we can build a pathway to citizenship for those neighbors who have been here making us richer and stronger, and we can keep out people who mean to do us harm.

So said Talaricounless you watch the Fox News Channel, in which case he said something quite different:

On March 3, Talarico won the Democratic Party's nomination for the Texas Senate seat. Two days later, right there on The Five, Dana Perino, age 53, introduced a doctored bit of videotape in which Talarico was shown saying this:

Our southern border should be like our front porch. There should be a giant welcome mat out front.

Full stop! The Fox News Channel had disappeared the part of his statement about having a lock on the door!

In fairness to Perino, she probably didn't know that her corporate owners had created a doctored bit of tape. Also, the pay can be extremely good at the "news channel" where Perino is cast, on this nation's top-rated show, as the co-host who isn't nuts.

(For a fuller account of the doctoring of Talarico's statement, see this fact check by AFPby Agence France-Presse. Needless to say, Elon Musk, age 54, is part of this pathetic story. Somewhat instructively, we had to travel across the pond to find a formal fact-check of this pathetic misconduct.)

We'll assume that Perino didn't know that Talarico's statement had been doctored. We'll assume that Gutfeld and Compagno are unaware of this matter too.

There's no real assumption, on a show like The Five, that the four pro-MAGA co-hosts have any idea what they're talking about. With that, we move on to this:

With apologies, we're going to cite some conduct we regard as ugly and destructive, but also as deeply stupid. With apologies, we're going to take you on a brief trip inside Gutfeld's mind.

We'll start with Monday night's (primetime) Gutfeld! program. As always, the gentleman started with a few minutes of "jokes."

Most simply put, the fellow simply can't seem to quit a certain type of loathing. With apologies:

At 10:03, his final "joke" went exactly like this:

GUTFELD (3/16/26): And finally, the Best Picture [Oscar] went to One Battle After Another.

And no, that's not the name of the documentary about Rosie and her gynecologist.

In such ways, this undisguised nutcase conducts his own disordered battles everywhere all at once. Last night, at 10:03, he shoved his grimy little nose where it doesn't belong once again:

GUTFELD (3/18/26): And finally, comedian Chelsea Handler says that the house that she bought from RFK Jr. was deemed "toxic and unlivable." 

Which are the same words used by her gynecologist.

The man is 61 years old! Except for its effect on the world, we regard this as sad and pathetic. 

Simply put, he just can't seem to quit this general practice! On Tuesday night, no gynecologists were mentioned. But in his first three minutes of jokes, he compared Michelle Obama to a horse; he complained about Rosie O'Donnell's unbelievably hairy back; and he told us what President Macron thinks about his wife's penis.

We've advised you to pity the child. Let's return to our starting place:

On Tuesday's edition of The Five, this same person said he gets "Ted Bundy vibes" from the vastly more accomplished Talarico. Moments later, Compagno described Talarico as "a terrifying child" who makes her think of David Koreshand, apparently, of this second cult leader.

Over the next few days, we're going to post fuller transcripts of what these two people said about Talarico. We think a record should be created for future generations, assuming such people are going to exist.

That said:

All around the ramparts of Blue America, the strange behavior of people like Gutfeld and Compagno is met by complete, total silence. We leave you today with a question:

Whose behavior is stranger, uglier, less excusable? The behavior of the peculiar people who play the game the Fox News Channel way? Or the behavior of the self-impressed Blue elites who insist on averting their gaze?

("Thank you, silence," Alanis Morissette said. We don't think she meant this.)

Tomorrow or Saturday: What Gutfeld and Compagno said, not that anyone cares

Additional bonus language: Within the context of the song and the larger body of early work, we regard this as profound implied advice:

Thank you, India
Thank you, terror
Thank you, disillusionment
Thank you, frailty
Thank you, consequence
Thank you, thank you, silence

"You learn," this youthful seer also said. People, where in the world did that very bright person ever get that idea?

WEDNESDAY: Everyone Perino knows...

WEDNESDAY, MARCH 18, 2026

...already has a passport: Would some people be deprived of the right to vote under terms of the SAVE (or Save America) Act?  

How many people might be so deprived? Who might those people be? 

Yesterday afternoon, we said there has been remarkably little energy directed toward the task of trying to answer such questions. That might be because no one ever thought the bill would actually make it through the Senate. Also, it may just be a consequence of "the flooding of the zone," in which news orgs are overwhelmed by the profusion of foolishness which does in fact need to be covered. 

We've alleged, you can decide! For today, we thought you might like to see what happened yesterday on The Five, during the ritual interruption and overtalking of Jessica Tarlov, the show's twice-weekly punching bag. 

During yesterday's second segment, the five co-hosts pretended to tackle the knotty topic known as the SAVE Act. Eventually, Tarlov tried to explain how the proposed procedures would work. 

Even if Tarlov hadn't been interrupted, we aren't sure she could have done it. For amusement purposes only, we direct you to something said by Johnny Joey Jones before the start of Tarlov's effort.

Jones routinely engages in self-pitying reminiscences about the way he grew up in Dalton, Georgia. (Later, he served with great valor as a Marine bomb technician in Afghanistan.) Yesterday, with respect to the kinds of documentation involved in the SAVE Act, he offered this unintentionally comical family portrait

JONES (3/17/26): I might be the only one here that grew up, like, really far from middle classmaybe not. Grew up poor, had a great life, had food on the table. We also had our birth certificates...

At one time, a certain reminiscence was common within parts of this nation's lower-income world:

We were poor, but we didn't know we were poor.

Recalling the great life he miserably had, Jones had now rewritten that bromide:

We were poorbut we all had our birth certificates!

Based on that reminiscence, Jones went on to reject the idea that people can't assemble the documentation required by the SAVE Act (whatever that documentation might actually turn out to be). 

Tarlov then began trying to explain the alleged problems with the proposal. She started off with this:

TARLOV: When you talk about proof of citizenship, that comes one of two ways. First, a passport, which only 50% of Americans have. It costs $165 to get a passport...

From there, she turned to the question of birth certificates. Soon, the tedium became unbearable for her four pro-MAGA co-hosts. Inevitably, the interruptions started, with Master Gutfeld saying this:

TARLOV: Why are you interrupting me?

GUTFELD: Because it's fun!

We doubt that Tarlov could have explained the possible problems with this proposal if she'd been given the full hour. But soon, the MAGA co-hosts were asking her questions like this:

GUTFELD: Do you know somebody who doesn't have an ID? (Sarcastically) Tell me about it! 

You've spent years talking about a person who could not get an ID and I've never met one. I've never met one! Why should I believe this now? 

PERINO (puzzled): How many people in your life— But how many people in your life don't have a passport?

TARLOV: In my life as an upper middle-class person? I don't even know...

Perino seemed to be puzzled! Doesn't everyone Tarlov knows already have a passport? Does anyone else even count?

Tarlov had already said that 50% of Americans don't have a passport, and that getting one costs money. But so went the cluelessness as the pro-MAGA hosts pretended to be trying to examine a complex policy question.

Might some or many lower-income people be unable to afford getting a passport?  Presumably, the answer would be yesbut thoughts of such people were swept away as the interruptions, followed by the inevitable joking, brought the latest imitation of a news discussion to a premature end.

This was yesterday's second segment. In the segment which followed, vampires flew out of the drapes in the manner described this morning

Talarico's like Ted Bundy, one of the undead said. No, he's more like David Koresh, a second creature opined.

More on that astounding third segment will follow. Under prevailing rules of the Blue American game, you'll see it nowhere else.

Final point: So how would the SAVE Act work? At this site, we still have no real idea!


BATTLES: The hopeful reminds him of Ted Bundy!

WEDNESDAY, MARCH 18, 2026

He reminds her of David Koresh: Tinseltown rarely gets it wrong. 

We only wish we could say the same thing about the cowardly kittens who wrestle in their cardboard boxes. They're sold to us in Blue America as the journalistic giants we can trust. 

Tinseltown gets it right! Last night, the battles weren't everywhere all at onceit wasn't exactly one battle after another--but the warfare came remarkably close. 

On MS NOW, the sitting president was attacked as a "sociopath" again, at 10:09 p.m. Eastern. (He was attacked as "a pathological liar" at 10:04. He was attacked as "a madman who thinks bombing is fun" at 10:10.) 

That battle was fought on MS NOW. On the Fox News Channel—indeed, on this nation's most-watched "cable news" programthe warfare yesterday virtually defied comprehension. 

In the second segment of The Five, the ritual "over-talking of Tarlov" had already occurred. That opened the way for what happened in the program's third segment, when this collection of messenger children had been told that they should pretend to discuss James Talarico, the Texas Senate hopeful:

The Five: Tuesday, 3/17/26
Emily Compagno: co-host, Outnumbered
Jessica Tarlov: twice-weekly punching bag
Johnny Joey Jones: co-anchor, The Big Weekend Show
Dana Perino: co-anchor, America's Newsroom
Greg Gutfeld: host, Gutfeld!

The over-talking had already happened during the second segment. Below, you see a brief overview of the Senate candidate they would now pretend to discuss, even as the cowardly kittens in Blue America agreed to avert their gaze:

James Talarico

James Dell Talarico (born May 17, 1989) is an American politician, Presbyterian seminarian, and former educator who has served since 2018 as a member of the Texas House of Representatives. Talarico is the Democratic nominee for the 2026 U.S. Senate election in Texas and has been called a "rising star" among Texan Democrats.

Born in Round Rock, Texas, Talarico graduated from the University of Texas at Austin with a Bachelor of Arts in government. He later joined Teach For America, where he taught sixth-grade English language arts in San Antonio. Afterward, he served as the Central Texas executive director for Reasoning Mind, a nonprofit focused on bringing technology to low-income classrooms. He later graduated from Harvard University with a Master of Education degree in education policy.

Talarico serves as vice chair of two bodies in the Texas House: the Trade, Workforce, and Economic Development Committee and the Subcommittee on Academic and Career-Oriented Education under the Public Education Committee. He also serves on the Public Education Committee and the House Administration Committee. 

[...]

Talarico attended Round Rock ISD schools and graduated from McNeil High School in Williamson County, Texas...Talarico's maternal grandfather was a Baptist preacher in South Texas who Talarico says taught him that Christianity "is a simple—though not easy—religion, rooted in two commandments: 'love God and love your neighbor.' " 

He grew up in a tiny, dusty Texas town, emerged from a small rural high school. Except wait! 

Round Rock is a Texas city whose population exceeds 135,000. The back-country high school from which he emerged is home to 2,700 students!

"Love God and love your neighbor," he says his grandfather said. This leads to the disgraceful GOP scam which Tarlov quickly described yesterday, though only in a very limited manner. 

We'll detail that scam at some point in the next few days. Our question is this:

Will Jeffrey Goldberg ever get off his ascot and report this disgraceful behavior in the pages of The Atlantic? 

(Also, will the PBS NewsHour get off its aspic and detail this McCarthy era-level scam? Will the program dare to name the people who are conducting this scam? Or will standard avoidance prevail?)

Tarlov went first, profiling Talarico. Then the zombies closed in.

In Tinseltown, the zombies were featured in Sinners this year. Yesterday, there they were, behaving in astonishing ways on the "cable news" program whose viewership dwarfs that of our own Blue American shows. 

When the zombies came rolling out, a basic fact emerged. Simply put, they aren't impressed with this Senate candidate! 

As Dana Perino covered her eyesshe's cast as the MAGA supporter who isn't insaneastounding assessments emerged:  

As it turned out, the zombie Gutfeld isn't impressed with the Texas Senate candidate. He said that Talarico is a good deal like "a radical Islamist," in that he believes that people who don't share his views "are evil."

"I'm getting Ted Bundy vibes," this undisguised zombie eventually said. As you may recall, Ted Bundyhe was executed in 1989was this vastly disordered person:

Ted Bundy

Theodore Robert Bundy was an American serial killer who kidnapped, raped and murdered dozens of young women and girls between 1974 and 1978. His modus operandi typically consisted of convincing his target that he was in need of assistance or duping them into believing he was an authority figure. He would then lure his victim to his vehicle, at which point he would bludgeon them unconscious, then restrain them with handcuffs before driving them to a remote location to be sexually assaulted and killed.

Bundy killed his first definitively-known victim in February 1974 in Washington, and his later crimes stretched to Oregon, Colorado, Utah and Idaho. He frequently revisited the bodies of his victims, grooming and performing sex acts on the corpses until decomposition and destruction by wild animals made further interactions impossible...

And so on from there. The craziest zombie on the panel said he gets "a Ted Bundy vibe" from the Texas Senate hopeful! 

Soon after that, it came time for Emily Compagno to offer her thoughts and impressions. Among other extremely strange remarks, she offered this assessment: 

"He's like the goblin version of Pete Buttigieg, where he's going to take off the outer layer and you're going to see a David Koresh." 

That's one of things she said! As you may recall, David Koreshhe died in 1993was this disastrous person:

David Koresh

David Koresh was an American cult leader and preacher who played a central role in the Waco siege of 1993. As the head of the Branch Davidians, a religious sect, Koresh claimed to be its final prophet. His apocalyptic Biblical teachings, including interpretations of the Book of Revelation and the Seven Seals, attracted various followers.

[...]

Koresh was alleged to have been involved in multiple incidents of physical and sexual abuse of children. His doctrine of the House of David did lead to "marriages" with both married and single women in the Branch Davidians.

A six-month investigation of sexual abuse allegations by the Texas Child Protection Services in 1992 failed to turn up any evidence, possibly because the Branch Davidians concealed the spiritual marriage of Koresh to Rachel's younger sister, Michele, when she was 12...

Let it be said that those are largely allegations. But this is the person who comes to mind when Compagno thinks of the Senate hopeful.

(Later, she described the candidate as "a terrifying child" who "grew up on the Love Israel cult in Washington, or something frightening." Could she possibly have been referring to the Love Israel commune in the state of Washington, back in the 1970s? At this point, we're prepared to guess that that's who she did have in mind!)

So the battle went. To watch the entire segment, courtesy of the Fox News Channel itself, you can click right here.

During this segment, Talarico was compared to a mass murderer / sexual pervert, but also to at least one disordered cult leader. "You are right that he is dangerous," the frightened Compagno said.

In the next few days, we plan to transcribe the fuller set of remarks in this segmentthe remarks which won't be reported or discussed in the pages of the New York Times or at The Atlantic (or on MS NOW). We think this conduct should be memorialized for future historians, if any such people turn out to exist.

At any rate, this was one of the battles enacted yesterday on the imitation "cable news" channel where, just to be honest, it's one manufactured battle after another, pretty much all at once.

Two weeks ago, these same beasts amused themselves by pretending that President Clinton was ogling photos of sexual victims during his deposition for the House Oversight Committee. We Blues have heard nothing about that egregious journalistic misconduct from the people at Blue America's exalted news orgsfrom the people we're told we can trust.

Yesterday, the collection of zombies comported themselves in the manner described. It was one battle after another as Perino pretended she couldn't see or hear what was happening all around her. 

(In fairness, the paychecks are large, Red and Blue paychecks alike.)

Perino pretended she couldn't see and couldn't hear. Over here in Blue America, our most exalted corporate stars affect the very same pose!

Tomorrow: More of what was said last night? Or will the battles move on?

Also this: As of this very morning, Mediaite has blown right past this astonishing conduct. 

Instead, the site has reported this speck of nothingness from the very same show!