tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8611810694571930415.post8346362005517888264..comments2024-03-28T05:16:23.860-04:00Comments on the daily howler: NO EXCUSE LEFT BEHIND: "A lot of people are focused on bettering, so to speak, all the schools!"<b>bob somerby</b>http://www.blogger.com/profile/02963464534685954436noreply@blogger.comBlogger59125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8611810694571930415.post-53741851881719022602022-01-03T02:12:29.187-05:002022-01-03T02:12:29.187-05:00TODAY I GOT MY DESIRED LOAN AMOUNT $520,000.00 FRO...<br /><br />TODAY I GOT MY DESIRED LOAN AMOUNT $520,000.00 FROM A RELIABLE AND TRUSTED LOAN COMPANY. IF YOU NEED A LOAN NOW EMAIL CONTACT drbenjaminfinance@gmail.com<br /><br />Hello, I'm here to testify of how i got my loan from BENJAMIN LOAN FINANCE(drbenjaminfinance@gmail.com) I don't know if you are in need of an urgent loan to pay bills, start business or build a house, they offer all kinds of loan. So feel free to contact Dr. Benjamin Owen he holds all of the information about how to obtain money quickly and painlessly without cost/stress via Email: drbenjaminfinance@gmail.com<br /><br />Consider all your financial problems tackled and solved ASAP. Share this to help a soul right now THANKS.Mrs. McCarthy Juanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08564275766136770597noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8611810694571930415.post-24668089040500762412020-09-12T21:41:02.414-04:002020-09-12T21:41:02.414-04:00Thanks to Robert seaman for his wonderful mastercl...Thanks to Robert seaman for his wonderful masterclass strategy which has help me earn at least $8,000 weekly using his masterclass strategy and has also helped me recover all my lost money in binary options trading, i recommend his help to each traders whose point is to succeed and make good profits in binary options and also for those who wants to get back all their lost money and for those who are new in trading or have any issues in tradings, you can contact him on Robertseaman939@gmail.com Rosie Aneyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17117306282350888917noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8611810694571930415.post-69722813384347294342019-04-06T14:22:09.314-04:002019-04-06T14:22:09.314-04:00First of all, the so-called "Milgram experime...First of all, the so-called "Milgram experiment" was a hoax. <br /><br />And second, your "safety in numbers" hypothesis doesn't make any sense, imo. <br /><br />These days, with the "me too" phenomenon hyped beyond any reasonable measures, what one <i>should</i> expect is a bunch of fabricated or greatly exaggerated accusations...<br /><br />This is a 'aimed' at you, dembot. Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8611810694571930415.post-30141439405012422912019-04-06T13:25:28.795-04:002019-04-06T13:25:28.795-04:00When Milgram did his study of people's willing...When Milgram did his study of people's willingness to inflict shocks on a peer, he found that if only one person stood up to the investigator and refused to give the shock, others would refuse too. But if no one went first, the others remained compliant.<br /><br />When one woman speaks up, others follow because they find safety in numbers, especially if that first woman is taken seriously and doesn't get shut down by ridicule or retaliation. This phenomenon doesn't have to be organized by anyone. It happens because people take courage from the behavior of others.<br /><br />The reason why so many woman come forward all at once is because Biden has done this to so many women. They all have been sitting with their own experiences, keeping them to themselves. If Biden didn't do this so much, there wouldn't be so many complaints once women have "permission" to speak out.<br /><br />Note: this is not aimed at Mao, who is a troll, but at anyone lurking who doesn't understand why there seems to be a piling on whenever an accusation appears like this.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8611810694571930415.post-16812329290586701502019-04-06T11:56:17.390-04:002019-04-06T11:56:17.390-04:00"It doesn't take an orchestrated takedown..."It doesn't take an orchestrated takedown for women to bring their issues to public awareness"<br /><br />Sure it does. The giveaway here is that these wimmin with agencies suddenly come out of the woods en masse when the guy becomes the most likely nominee. One does not need to be Sherlock Holmes to deduce it.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8611810694571930415.post-56764123804305000602019-04-06T11:17:09.447-04:002019-04-06T11:17:09.447-04:00When one woman comes forward, others with the same...When one woman comes forward, others with the same experiences are encouraged to do the same. It doesn't take an orchestrated takedown for women to bring their issues to public awareness. It is problematic when men such as this columnist assume that women have no agency and cannot be concerned about this themselves without it being orchestrated by some man or political entity planning a campaign.<br /><br />It is a giveaway when someone suggests that Clinton is meddling in the left's primary. The only folks who worry about Clinton's participation are on the right, since they think she is involved in some giant conspiracy to rule the globe. She is no longer running for anything and is not a source of these attacks on Biden, especially since they are not political opponents. So this suggestion only makes sense to conservatives, for whom Clinton is a generic boogeyman.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8611810694571930415.post-5326168539607355972019-04-06T11:10:42.186-04:002019-04-06T11:10:42.186-04:00Some Sanders supporters are apparently upset over ...Some Sanders supporters are apparently upset over the 2016 primaries and are saying they will vote 3rd party (again) if Sanders isn't the nominee. Stories are noting the need for Democrats to deal with lingering issues from 2016.<br /><br />They will need to do more than placate Sanders supporters. Although Clinton did win the nomination, many Clinton voters consider Sanders to have undermined Clinton's campaign and failed to support her as nominee, resulting in her losses in WI, MI, and PA. This defection by someone who is considered to be less than a Democrat in spirit, was one factor contributing to Trump's win, which Clinton Democrats believe they have never acknowledged or taken responsibility for. Now Sanders is repeating his spoiler role.<br /><br />The Democratic party does need to deal with this, but not by placating progressives who place themselves ahead of party loyalty or even defeating the Republican nominee. Meanwhile, Sanders does nothing to prevent his supporters from doing damage to liberal interests, just as he did very little bring together the left after his primary losses (which were legitimately lost).<br /><br />Obama and Clinton healed their party after Obama's primary win. There is a model for such cooperation. Sanders needs to be motivated to do the same, as he was not in 2016. <br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8611810694571930415.post-28743741183638178732019-04-06T10:59:46.598-04:002019-04-06T10:59:46.598-04:00Here's one journalist's opinion:
Howie Car...Here's one journalist's opinion:<br /><a href="https://www.bostonherald.com/2019/04/02/i-smell-a-familiar-rat-in-biden-takedown-try/" rel="nofollow">Howie Carr: Who’s behind Joe Biden’s takedown try?</a>Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8611810694571930415.post-56962436720504970852019-04-06T10:56:27.379-04:002019-04-06T10:56:27.379-04:00"Public education, especially through high sc..."Public education, especially through high school, is about providing a broad-based education to all students."<br /><br />I completely agree. That's why illiterate deadbeats (the “undesirable”, in your lingo) should be sent to advanced classes. But only if they belong to the ethnic group most loyal to the liberal cult. Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8611810694571930415.post-69526136001810932172019-04-06T10:48:40.243-04:002019-04-06T10:48:40.243-04:00Biden doesn't think his behavior is a big deal...Biden doesn't think his behavior is a big deal. But, he is dividing Democrats and that is a problem:<br /><br />https://nomoremister.blogspot.com/2019/04/biden-is-now-sowing-division-among.html<br /><br />Most Democrats are unwilling to fully confront the issue with Biden. They are staying far away from the complaints about his touching of children, focusing only on non-sexual touching of adults, mostly women. But the right has been circulating composite videos (some doctored but others not) of Biden caressing young girls while parents try to disengage him from their children. These are more disturbing than his pat-downs of women because the kids are mostly very young girls and because they are clearly uncomfortable and don't know what to do about it, and because there are so many unique instances of him doing this.<br /><br />Why is it OK for Biden to fondle children, simply because he is VP? He caresses their hair, places hands on their bodies, in much the same way as he touches women. He seeks them out to do this to them. He rearranges photo groupings to do this. And it is blatantly obvious from the videos that exist and have been rolled into montages by conservatives.<br /><br />But Democrats are saying nothing, pretending these don't exist, perhaps hoping they will go away. They really don't want to open that can of worms because it should end Biden's prospects as a candidate.<br /><br />So while folks like Bill Maher complain that this is a hooey, the rest of the Democrats are keeping mum about the bigger issue of his behavior with young children. And that is very wrong for a party that is supposedly against such abuses. Do we, as liberals, really think it is OK for adult men to touch other people's children in ways that make those kids clearly uncomfortable, simply because the men hold political power (or are smiling and affable and pretending to be grandfatherly)? Why are the needs of Joe Biden being placed ahead of the needs of kids (most of whom are there because of parent political activities and not on their own volition)? Kids are no more objects than adult women are. It is not OK for Biden to touch them at will, and Democrats should not be avoiding this issue and pretending this is all a trivial disagreement about hugging.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8611810694571930415.post-49969417259927964362019-04-06T07:53:10.479-04:002019-04-06T07:53:10.479-04:00"Because the teaching goes at a level and spe..."Because the teaching goes at a level and speed that most students couldn't keep up with. "<br /><br />This is false. <br /><br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8611810694571930415.post-21214894663081031292019-04-06T07:52:35.442-04:002019-04-06T07:52:35.442-04:00David, are you one of Donald J Chickenshit's &...David, are you one of Donald J Chickenshit's "tough guys"? Are you one of the guys with guns like in the military or a cop? Or are you in the "bikers for Donald J Chickenshit"? You know, the fucking coward sissy boy who needs 3 hours every morning to arrange that birds nest he wears on his head? Is it going to get "very very bad" if we all don't support Donald J Chickenshit? Please, give me a warning, I know you're my friend.mmnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8611810694571930415.post-66242390233289198762019-04-06T07:49:35.476-04:002019-04-06T07:49:35.476-04:00Trump fired the head of the FBI to stop an investi...Trump fired the head of the FBI to stop an investigation into his corruption. There are other acts of obstruction of justice, but not quite as bald-faced.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8611810694571930415.post-21595155944790154072019-04-05T19:27:50.467-04:002019-04-05T19:27:50.467-04:00@5:55 Why should public schools screen out student...@5:55 <i>Why should public schools screen out students anyway?</i> Because the teaching goes at a level and speed that most students couldn't keep up with. David in Calhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09068188536758619565noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8611810694571930415.post-53631421984208910552019-04-05T19:26:03.252-04:002019-04-05T19:26:03.252-04:00@5:47 You got it. The SAT is an aptitude test. T...@5:47 You got it. The SAT is an aptitude test. The SHSAT is not an aptitude test.David in Calhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09068188536758619565noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8611810694571930415.post-14133257541693414832019-04-05T18:45:25.371-04:002019-04-05T18:45:25.371-04:00Why don’t we wait and see what Mueller said about ...Why don’t we wait and see what Mueller said about obstruction? <br /><br />If we ever find out, that is. Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8611810694571930415.post-23707480723917433822019-04-05T18:02:11.279-04:002019-04-05T18:02:11.279-04:00The original intent of the SHSAT was to exclude “u...The original intent of the SHSAT was to exclude “undesirable” students from the specialized high schools, which, by the way, are supposed to be public schools, not elite private academies. <br /><br />The professions you list are not relevant. They represent specialties where licensing is essential. Public education, especially through high school, is about providing a broad-based education to all students. Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8611810694571930415.post-16580150182405057572019-04-05T17:55:02.361-04:002019-04-05T17:55:02.361-04:00The test itself isn’t racist. The intention can be...The test itself isn’t racist. The intention can be. That was my point. Minority races outperform whites? You mean Asians? But other than that, no. <br /><br />And yeah, it tests the stuff “students should have learned”, but didn’t or couldn’t because of factors either at home, at school, or in their community, ie factors not completely under the control of those students. Similarly, if blacks just had had enough money, why they could vote. Or if they had just known stuff they should have known, they could have voted. It’s a catch-22.<br /><br />Why should public schools screen out students anyway?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8611810694571930415.post-91439717324764934572019-04-05T17:53:11.614-04:002019-04-05T17:53:11.614-04:00"The test itself isn’t racist, but perhaps th..."The test itself isn’t racist, but perhaps the intention was."<br /><br />Yes, definitely. Also, the bar exam, any tests for doctors' electricians', plumbers' licenses -- they are all racist plots. As well as the test for a driving license, obviously.<br /><br />Anyone from the ethnic group universally voting for the zombie cult must immediately become a surgeon, if they want to. It's in the liberal Bible.<br /><br />Brain-decomposed zombies against testing, what a comedy. Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8611810694571930415.post-64938997182217479572019-04-05T17:47:16.934-04:002019-04-05T17:47:16.934-04:00Hey, David, have you ever heard of the SAT? Yeah, ...Hey, David, have you ever heard of the SAT? Yeah, that one? What does S A T stand for? Oh that’s right...Scholastic APTITUDE Test. <br /><br />Jesus. Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8611810694571930415.post-43824260377988536052019-04-05T17:47:16.110-04:002019-04-05T17:47:16.110-04:00mm - do you think Trump committed obstruction of j...mm - do you think Trump committed obstruction of justice? If so, can you please explain your conclusion?David in Calhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09068188536758619565noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8611810694571930415.post-62142102389900136122019-04-05T17:45:08.851-04:002019-04-05T17:45:08.851-04:00There's no reason to think that the SHSAT is r...There's no reason to think that the SHSAT is racist. It tests the stuff students should have learned. Also, minority races outperform whites on these tests. David in Calhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09068188536758619565noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8611810694571930415.post-51374799898462767152019-04-05T17:38:45.273-04:002019-04-05T17:38:45.273-04:00Oh good grief. Barr came into office saying the pr...Oh good grief. Barr came into office saying the president basically can’t be indicted for obstruction. Mueller wasn’t ever going to indict the fucker. He did say that Trump was not exonerated. And Congress is the one with the power to remove a president. Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8611810694571930415.post-86567678600644814192019-04-05T17:33:56.671-04:002019-04-05T17:33:56.671-04:00Well, then call the test what you want. It doesn’t...Well, then call the test what you want. It doesn’t change the original point. The test at the poll was also a knowledge-based test. Way to quibble. Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8611810694571930415.post-28432918036982858072019-04-05T17:33:35.804-04:002019-04-05T17:33:35.804-04:00Mueller effectively cleared Trump of obstruction o...Mueller effectively cleared Trump of obstruction of justice by not indicting him. Furthermore, Rod Rosenstein worked with Barr in creating the summary that they released. <br /><br />BTW mm, I recommend reading this column, <b>Dems Have Vastly More to Fear from Full Mueller Report than GOP </b> https://pjmedia.com/rogerlsimon/dems-have-vastly-more-to-fear-from-full-mueller-report-than-gop/<br /><br />Don't know whether Roger L. Simon is right, but it's something to think about.David in Calhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09068188536758619565noreply@blogger.com