Krugman speaks up, many years too late!

MONDAY, SEPTEMBER 26, 2016

Just look at the very first comment:
In this new post, Paul Krugman speaks up, much too late, about the "abnormalization" of Candidate Clinton.

This "defining" of Clinton has been underway for 24 years. Krugman quotes the heroic Jonathan Chait, who actively enabled this game during the vast bulk of that era, but has begun fighting back in the past week or so:
KRUGMAN (9/26/16): [A]s Jonathan Chait says, the problem hasn’t just been the normalization of Trump, it has been the abnormalization of Clinton. Consider the AP report on the Clinton Foundation. An honest report would have said, “The foundation arguably creates the possibility of self-dealing and undue influence, but we’ve looked hard and haven’t found much of anything.” Instead, the report played up meetings with a Nobel Peace Prize winner as being somehow scandalous.

And it’s still happening, if not quite so relentlessly. We’re still seeing reports about how something Clinton did “raises questions,” “casts shadows,” etc.—weasel words that allow reporters to write negative stories regardless of the facts.

I’ve compared this to what went down in the 2000 campaign; Nick [Kristof] compares it to what happened in the runup to the Iraq war. Pick your analogy.
"Pick you analogy," Krugman says. In the case of Campaign 2000, just don't discuss it with the public until sixteen to seventeen years have passed!

Two points should be made. First, the abnormalization of Clinton involves much more serious journalistic dysfunction than the normalization of Trump.

Newspapers like the New York Times have been running from Trump's craziness and/or dishonesty, dating to the period when he made himself King of the Birthers. But the "abnormalization" of Clinton, Clinton and Gore has been going on forever. Hillary Clinton has been massively "defined" in the process. It is many years too late to notice this problem now.

Second point: The very first comment to Krugman's post shows the problem with Krugman's permissive "pick your analogy" hook. Comments like these should make a progressive tear his or her last remaining hairs:
COMMENT FROM WALTHAM, MASS. (9/26/16): A thoughtful, nuanced post by Krugman. I still think a large part of the double standard applied to Hillary is due to misogyny. Or, more accurately, the power-relationship between men and women. This pushy broad is intruding on a formerly all-male preserve. I don't think most people realize how deeply this anti-feminist instinct runs in most men.

Yes, it is an instinct, and an ancient one at that. Today, we can see resistance to women's progress in many parts of the world. In the Islamic culture sphere, it is often violent.

I'm sure I'll get intensely defensive replies from male readers to this comment, as I have in the past. But they only serve to confirm me in my understanding of this issue.
Pseudo-progressive, please!

In a word, that comment is deeply clueless. It's the kind of perspective a progressive adopts when he lacks the first freaking clue about the journalistic history here—for example, about what "went down" in Campaign 2000, Krugman's chosen analogy.

The abnormalization of Candidate Gore had nothing to do with gender, but it's the same abnormalization which has been delivered to Hillary Clinton. Self-admiring pseudo-progressives insist on cramming this conduct into the high-minded frameworks they like. Their cluelessness about the larger picture stems from twenty years of silence from the likes of Krugman and Chait.

Once again, Krugman cites "the Clinton Rules" in today's post. It's good that he does so, of course. But those journalistic rules have been in operation forever. People like that first commenter have simply never been told.

Here's how Krugman closes his post. This too is deeply clueless:
KRUGMAN: I doubt that reporters or even editors have thought of themselves as trying to elect Trump; many of them will be horrified if he wins. But they went all in on Clinton Rules, under which sneering at and razzing a Clinton is considered good for your career. It’s really more like high school than high journalism, but it may have horrendous consequences.

A lot depends on whether the same behavior continues for the final stretch. If the media report on the debates the way they did in 2000—if substance is replaced by descriptions of Clinton’s facial expressions, her sighs, or how she “comes across,” while downplaying Trump’s raw lies, say hello to the Trump White House. And history will not forgive the people who made it possible.
History will not forgive the people who made it possible? Press corps enabler, please!

As we explained many years ago, the mainstream press corps is unique among American elites. Unlike every other professional or industry group, the mainstream press corps gets to decide what gets written about itself.

For that reason, the press corps' conduct in Campaign 2000 has gone completely unexplored and undiscussed, despite the many years we spent detailing it. The Clinton Rules may have horrendous consequences? Careerist cracker, please! As we've noted again and again, they already have!

Perhaps the horrors of a President Trump will produce a break in the press corps' ironclad code of silence, which is reliably maintained by the usual professors. But we can think of no reason to assume that any such thing will occur.

People like Krugman and Kristof and Chait have always made the smart career play over the many years of this mess. Their active role in the code of silence has us on the verge of an era of Trump.

Fearful, they've finally started telling the truth. But they've told the truth extremely slowly over these many ridiculous years. If history stands on its feet to complain, it will complain about them.

89 comments:

  1. Crazy actions are a lot worse than crazy-sounding talk. I forgive Hillary for voting for the Iraq war. It was a mistake, but she didn't know that the intelligence showing Saddam's nuclear development was incorrect.

    However, the disastrous overthrow of Khadafy in Libya was crazy. Aside from the lack of a plan of what to do next, there was no reason for it. Khadafy had ended his nuclear weapon development at our request, so nukes weren't the reason. I have never heard a sane and sensible reason offered.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. You don't do very well with "sane and sensible."

      Delete
    2. David, the US action in Libya was very reasonable and neither crazy or disastrous. You appear to be massively misinformed about Libya. Qaddafi was going to be overthrown whether the US got involved or not, and likely by the kind of extremists that upset you so much. NATO decided to proceed with a very small amount of military action to prevent civilians from the violent threats of brutal dictator Qaddafi. The US involvement was extremely small, a few missiles, one day of drone attacks, a few support ships and aircraft. Libya was already a disaster, NATO interceded to prevent crimes against humanity. Libya has suffered the consequences any country suffers when a brutal dictator is toppled. It is rebuilding and the extremists are being pushed out. You were upset in the comments here that the US did not intervene in Syria (a vastly different situation) so I think it is more likely you are not so misinformed, but instead trying to misinform to further your own selfish agenda.

      Delete
    3. David's partly right, as sometimes happens.

      You, 5:10 are an idiot.

      You refer to "small" intervention in Libya and lack of intervention in Syria.

      You are dreadfully wrong on both counts. The Iraq war itself constituted a huge intervention in Syria, essentially compromising its borders and generating huge flows of refugees and armaments.

      This leaves aside the direct, material interventions by the US in Syria including covert supply and training for dissidents and rebels.

      Your estimation of minimal intervention in Libya is similarly flawed, neglecting in the first instance the veneer of legitimacy given to the quite large involvement of outside forces that was given by the entirely illegal US action.

      Delete
  2. "The abnormalization of Candidate Gore had nothing to do with gender, ...."

    How soon they forget, even the redoubtable Bob Somerby.

    "Al Gore is so feminized and diversified and ecologically correct, he's practically lactating."

    ReplyDelete
  3. The constant interruptions of her--not gonna play well with women voters.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Are you are woman or are you mansplainin?

      Delete
    2. "The constant interruptions of her ...."

      Did you keep track? Leah Libresco of 538 did.

      Guess what - you're full of shit.

      She separated an interruption - where a candidate commandeered the other candidate's response, from a fleeting interruption - where a candidate interjected while the other candidate continued his/her response.

      Libresco's tally: Clinton had zero interruptions and three fleeting interruptions while Trump had three interruptions and twenty-four fleeting interruptions.

      Pushing an easily-refuted HDS narrative is just pathetic.

      Delete
    3. HDS? Harry Dean Stanton? The 27 fleeting interruptions certainly were annoying to me. I have read that there is data proving that men interrupt women more that they interrupt men. But I could be wrong and would love to see evidence that I am wrong.

      Delete
    4. That's one interruption every four minutes in 100 minute span. Annoying by any measure.

      Delete
    5. http://nytlive.nytimes.com/womenintheworld/2015/03/19/google-chief-blasted-for-repeatedly-interrupting-female-government-official/

      Delete
    6. the interruptions were just rude. let the lady talk...there was a framework to allow for responses.

      Delete
    7. Call her a lady again, just so we understand how non-sexist and magnanimous you are toward the women-folk.

      Delete
    8. wow, I defend her and still get yelled at!!! we have come to the point where we just yell at people even when we agree with them!!!

      what is wrong with calling her a lady exactly? is she not a lady? Lady is essentially New York slang...not an insult. Why don't you try to stop and understand before you start yelling at people. what should I have called her? Some people on this board are just jerks...they must be doing it on purpose because no one can possibly be that f*cking stupid. I am sure Mrs. Clinton would have no problem with my post, so I don't know why the moral police on Bob's blog do...

      Delete
    9. Lady is an antiquated term from our Victorian past that has a lot of baggage, including chivalry, protecting women while keeping them from full participation, and underlining their need to be separate and cosseted because of their frailty. It emphasizes gender in a situation where gender is irrelevant.

      Think about whether the male equivalent (is there one in NY slang?) would be OK in the same context -- probably not.

      You said: "...let the lady talk" As if she needed permission or help to do so. As if she were not a person with her own voice.

      Secretary Clinton would not criticize you because she doesn't sweat the small stuff but these casual insults that people like you don't even recognize as offensive are a source of irritation that women endure every day in an unrelenting stream.

      Delete
    10. I never said she needed permission or help to do so. and I was not insulting the lady...and btw, I know some women that still like chivalry and being treated like a lady, my wife included. so before you get your panties in a bunch and think you know all about my motives for using a word, and think you know all about "people like me", just relax and stop being so uptight. I thought Trump was rude for interrupting the woman (is that better?). he should have let her get her two minutes like the rules of the debate dictated, that's all I was saying. "people like you" just love to read into sh*t and see insults where there are none...you should really learn to stop and listen before you assume you are all knowing and know what a person thinks and feels about women. I have nothing but respect for women, and have had a lot of strong women role models in my life, so I take exception to a holier then thou a** like you telling me how I think and feel

      Delete
    11. It isn't about how YOU think and feel. It is about how your choice of words makes others think and feel. Narcissism means never having to worry about that.

      I think there is a subreddit somewhere that is missing your voice.

      Delete
    12. Hey 4:02,

      Did you ever stop to think that maybe he should choose his words better, but you're acting like a jerk about it? You're talking about subtleties of language, but you don't understand tone?

      Delete
  4. Trump had some good moments that will resonate with his supporters on trade and crime. The part where he nit her on the DNC and Bernie was effective. But by the end he looked a bit rattled and rambled on too long. Hillary had a good opening and finished really strong. She should get some momentum out of this, but I'd be surprised if it's huge.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. You either were watching a different debate than I did or you're yet another Trump hack.

      Delete
    2. Does everyone have swear allegiance to Clinton or get insulted? I agree that she won big. And predicted she would kick ass in the debate on this very blog yesterday. Frankly, if the question were more issue oriented she would have won even bigger. I just thought he looked like he had some momentum at that point in the debate. Before it fell apart. Not that I expected much out of him.

      Delete
    3. Trump seemed to me to be better prepared and more presidential. Clinton looked tired and had too much make up. Trump has her cold on some points and Clinton did great on trade and taxes but let's be honest, people hate Hillary. Some hate her because she is a woman which although not fair, is very, very understandable. Ours is a Patriarchy in every single way. I'm no fan of Trump but as we all can see from the polls, he has a very good chance of winning. Let's hope the best person wins. Thank you and have a blessed day.

      Delete
    4. Listen, Trump makes some good points that shouldn't be ignored (before anyone yells at me I am voting for Hillary). For example, I think he is right that a good number of politicians have sat idly by while the middle class of the country were sold up the river for the past 30-40 years. We also need law and order in the streets or else we don't have a country. With that said, the jobs that have left aren't coming back. We need to figure out how to position ourselves to create jobs working within the new economy. And the last thing we need are tax breaks that will add 5 or 10 trillion to the debt.

      Delete
    5. Anon at 10:46 -- I agree with @5:43. Take your Trump trolling and burn in hell.

      Delete
    6. why the hostility 11:02. people like you are what's wrong with this country. the Others make a valid point and you are so blinded by partisan motives that you can't concede, for one minute, that the guy actually made a good point. instead you just throw grenades from the safety of your keyboard. believe me, and if you knew me you would know, I am not trolling for trump. personally I can't stand the guy and would never vote for him. but he is right, unless you think that anarchy in the streets in the way to go...or that the middle class should continue to take it up the a** for the benefit of politicians and their crony friends. wake up and take your partisan blinders off. You are as bad as the republicans that refuse to work with President Obama just because. You are proving Mr. Somerby right on this thesis about demonization of The Others - on full display right here on his blog. Keep posting jerkoff.

      Delete
    7. Those praising Trumps early performance in the debate are like saying the Titanic sailed perfectly for days.

      Delete
    8. I fell asleep at the end, that must be what happened LOL

      Delete
  5. Today the NY Times says Clinton chided Trump for bungling facts. They might as well have said she scolded him like a fishwife. And those facts are so hard to keep straight. Better: Clinton fact-checked Trump's lies.

    This is what sexism and bias looks like. She isn't scolding him -- she is contradicting him -- because this is a debate and that's what debaters do. Evoking images of nagging moms and wives is wrong.

    And Trump didn't just misremember a few facts. He blatantly lied about his own statements. He didn't BUNGLE, he LIED. She wins the debate hands down and we still have to put up with this crap.

    ReplyDelete
  6. The fact that Trump used the word "big-ly" twice should disqualify him from the presidency.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. His son claims he is saying "big league" not bigly. He doesn't enunciate. Toward the end of his meltdown he was sounding like a thug.

      People made fun of Sanders accent but Trump also has one. It gets stronger when he is upset or tired.

      Delete
    2. I watched it in real time and don't buy that at all

      Delete
  7. After this debate I think even less of both candidates. For me, Trump didn't look Presidential. Hillary doesn't understand business economics. One reason we've had a recovery was low fuel prices. Lower costs encourage business expansion and job creation. Yet, Hillary thinks that switching to higher cost energy and higher taxes will create jobs.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I agree Trump didn't look presidential, especially with all the interrupting, but he made a couple of points that are worth thinking about (how do we maintain law and order, how do we create jobs in this country). I thought Hillary did ok - I am not sure I would have been able to keep so calm in her position - she acted like quite the lady (that one was for the word police on the blog). She should have spoke more about her positions rather than just direct people to her website to read about them (I tend to believe that most people just won't do that, but I could be wrong). Overall, I thought they both did ok and had some valid points...now I wait for some partisan hack to tell me to burn in hell because I am willing to listen to the other side.

      Delete
    2. Hillary is not running for CEO. She is running for President. Companies are not noted for caring much about their employees, beyond what they are coerced into doing by unions or law. The US Government exists to care about and protect the people of our nation. That is a HUGE difference between a CEO (who won't even pay taxes) and the president, who must be concerned with the welfare of everyone.

      If you are suggesting that Hillary, being a frail and lowly woman, can't do business math, remember that she will surround herself with people who can (e.g., Janet Yellin).

      Thinking like a businessman, you fail to include the cost to our planet in your assessment of what constitutes low cost energy.

      Unlike you, Hillary has read the reports that show that corporations given tax breaks do not invest the extra money in their businesses or their employees. They sit on it. That's why lowering taxes doesn't create jobs either. However, investing in new industries (like alternative energy technology) will create new jobs in the US that cannot be stolen by other countries lacking the expertise to compete. Those higher taxes can fund research at universities that can help us maintain our leadership in the global economy by developing new industries and technologies.

      Most businessmen think near-term and worry only about keeping their stock prices high so they can increase the value of their own options and holdings. That doesn't produce the planning needed to grow our economy on the larger scale.

      I am glad Hillary doesn't think like a business person.

      Delete
    3. I too am willing to listen to the other side. Tell me, DinC. what does looking "Presidential" look like?

      Delete
    4. I'd say the constant interrupting alone was very un-presidential

      Delete
    5. Some of my friends who are Trump supporters believe that it was the moderator who was interrupting Trump and that he had to speak over Clinton because she wouldn't let him get a word in edgewise. They apparently missed that the candidates were supposed to be taking turns and they clearly disliked the fact-checking and attempts by Holt to keep Trump focused on the question. It is fascinating to hear how different their reactions were to the debate. That's what the "other side" is like.

      Delete
    6. David is a troll from the other side and look at the crap he posted here.

      They can be reasoned with ...........NOT!

      Delete
  8. Just look at that first comment. Pseudo-blogger please. You don't read your own comments. Why should we read Krugman's?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Ooh - you found another hypocrisy! You'll have happy-pants all day!

      Delete
  9. My marriage of 3 years was sinking and i was devastated. My husband broke up with me and I got no explanations from him. for me to get him back, i have to find a solution, I went to 3 different spell casters they all failed to bring back my husband, I really wasn’t sure anymore if spells were real so as i was making a search one morning i saw some great reviews about happylovespell2@gmail.com, I was a bit skeptical at first but a friend asked me to try and see what happens, so I requested for a love spell from this spell caster, he said he will take his time to do a love spell that will bring my man back to me, after some days my husband reconciled with me, It felt good to have my husband back, when he returned he said he would never leave me again. I saw him transform, all thanks to Dr happy he was like a father to me when i loose hope. now my lover is more open, with happy Spell I know love spell is real, Thanks to Dr happy Spell for getting me my man back. I appreciate all his time, effort, and energy he puts during the spell cast. contact him on via mail happylovespell2@gmail.com he is the best of all spell casters Add him on Whats-pp +2348133873774??????.

    ReplyDelete
  10. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Our assignment writers are always there to help you out in your academic work.Get the best assignment help online
    you deserve from one of the best writing services online!
    programming assignment help

    ReplyDelete
  12. Writing a college essay can be a challenge. Many students really struggling with writing analytical papers. I have found this interesting service https://writer-elite.com/essay-writing-service/ Threre are tons of useful informations about academic writing and recommedations from expert writers. So you can write quality essay that gets results.

    ReplyDelete
  13. If you feel like asking from others “Can someone do my assignment” due to a lack subject knowledge. Then My assignment help helpers can easily prepare a highly informative assignment for you. With their help, you can also clear out all your concepts. So, without thinking much hire us now!

    ReplyDelete
  14. Thank you for the useful information you share. I like to rad such sort of posts. They include some specific material which would be a great addition to marketing plan writing service

    ReplyDelete
  15. you in the best way possible as per our knowledge and expertise. We have an in-depth knowledge of roadrunner email and we will be happy to share relevant tips with you which you can implement too without any technical knowledge.

    ReplyDelete
  16. Hello! I decided to add several words about one cool writing service. I know that writing papers is a big problem for many people but with the help of superb writing you can solve this problem quickly.

    ReplyDelete
  17. Intriguing! An interesting blog, as I find it very informative. But the art of writing is not immediately mastered, but there are secrets: https://thesisleader.com/hire-business-essay-writers/ I think of the best ways to quickly master writing and writing of any severity.

    ReplyDelete
  18. Facing trouble to open Quicken? Here are the quick steps to eliminate the problem along with you will also learn how to quicken won’t open issue.

    ReplyDelete
  19. Hire Finance Assignment Help Professionals to Boost the Grades. My Assignment Help writers are always available to work online 24x7. All your doubts can be clear whether late in the night or early in the morning. We will give you writing service around the clock.

    ReplyDelete
  20. Your post definitely hits the right spot. Kudos for the hard work. Your suggestion to opt for a reliable online assignment help facility is definitely a practical and feasible one in today scenario. This is where the impeccable online Assignment Help Melbourne service by the MyAssignmentHelpAU platform comes into the picture. If you are looking for a comprehensive assignment help facility that caters to all your writing requirements efficiently. Their assignment help Melbourne service is definitely the one-stop service for you. You can easily place an order for your complicated academic assignments with the MyAssignmentHelpaAU platform in three simple steps that too at highly reasonable prices.

    ReplyDelete
  21. very nice blog. Our customer care service will assist you throughout in assignment help process. 24x7 online chat support to the customers. if you need Python Assignment help we are here to help you. we also provide the Database homework help at the best price.

    ReplyDelete
  22. Excellent post! We are linking to this particularly great article on our website. Keep up the great writing. 한국야동닷컴

    Also feel free to visit may webpage check this link
    국산야동

    ReplyDelete
  23. Nice post. I learn something totally new and challenging on websites 중국야동넷

    Also feel free to visit may webpage check this link
    야설

    ReplyDelete
  24. The first-ever One Year MBA program in Digital Enterprise Management (DEM) introduces candidates with work experience to management concepts and leadership styles in the emerging digital business enterprises.

    ReplyDelete
  25. IIM PhD Program generally has a duration of 5 years. Students first complete rigorous coursework covering foundational subjects, methods and advanced courses in the area of specialization. The courses for PhD students are exclusively designed and are completely separate from the MBA curriculum.

    ReplyDelete
  26. Thank you for sharing this amazing article with us. Here I am sharing a great resource .
    igoal แทงบอล

    ReplyDelete
  27. terrific submit i hamonths! Thank you for informative put up. 메이저놀이터

    ReplyDelete
  28. extremely good info! I lately got herapproximately the alternative aspect? !!!!!! Thank you 토토배너

    ReplyDelete
  29. notable submit i have to say anight go away my first remark. I don’t realize what to mention besides that i've 파워사다리

    ReplyDelete
  30. Thank you for taking the time to talk about this, i sense strongly approximately it and love getting to know more in this topic. If feasible, as you gain understanding, could you mind updating your blog with greater facts? It's far extremely useful for me 해외정식사이트

    ReplyDelete
  31. preliminary you obtain bzing examine. I will certainly be again. 토토사이트

    ReplyDelete
  32. First-rate installation, i honestly love this website, keep on it 먹튀검증사이트

    ReplyDelete
  33. way cool! A few extraordinintain us up to date like this. Thanks for sharing. 바둑이확률

    ReplyDelete
  34. i need to say informative conles like this one. 기본토토용어

    ReplyDelete
  35. that is an first rate detail for sharing this beneficial message. I'm dazzled by means of the facts you have got in this blog. It reasons me from more than one points of view. A debt of gratitude is in order for posting this another time. There's so much in this article that i would by no means have idea of by myself. Your content gives readers matters to consider in an thrilling way. Hi there! I ought to have sworn i’ve been to this weblog earlier than however after surfing via a number of the submit i found out it’s new to me. Anyhow, i’m without a doubt glad i found it and that i’ll be book-marking and checking back frequently! 먹튀사이트주소

    ReplyDelete
  36. i think that is an info to mention that this blog definitely convinced me to do it! Thank you, excellent post 토토사이트추천

    ReplyDelete
  37. I’d choose to use some with the content fabric on my weblog whether or not or not you don’t thoughts. Natually i’ll come up with a link for it is genuinely apparent why. I analyze the whole lot about the energetic manner it provides profitable factors on this weblog and it also improves the contribution of others in this concept, so my princess is not any doubt beginning to analyze many stuff. Enjoy the relaxation of the 12 months. You probably did a exceptional procedure. Notable .. Lovely .. I will bookmark your blog and take the feeds moreover… 메이저놀이터코드

    ReplyDelete
  38. Nice blog! Great work. Keep it up.
    Click here for sell iphone 12 128gb

    ReplyDelete
  39. The problem with classification societies is that they are private businesses that sell their services in order to make money. This means that there is a lot of competition between classification societies to get customers. This can lead to a situation where one society gives a class to a ship that another society had denied. People have said that the process of class transfers is too easy Nursing Paper Writing Service USA to be used by dishonest ship owners who want to get something special from one society or avoid something special from another. This is called "shopping for classes." The International Association of Classification Societies has been working on this issue since 1968. Its goals are to help classification societies work together and make the rules of classification societies more uniform. IACS gives advice to the IMO.

    ReplyDelete
  40. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  41. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  42. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  43. Amazing article, I aam impressed to visit here. Keep it up. Are you playing clash royale? if yes, but if you don't know more about it so, you can get advice from beginners to think about the advanced tips in clash royale for new players. Because using the tips will make it easier to win in the gameplay and improve gameplay.

    ReplyDelete
  44. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  45. Very useful post. I think this can make me some idea. AFK Arena is a very famous game. Want to enhance your game? If yes, I refer you to one article about the AFK Arena codes in 2022 are redeemable upgrades that permit players to obtain free rewards every month. so you can try it at once.

    ReplyDelete
  46. Your article is well written and simple to understand.You make excellent points.Thank you for sharing amazing blog.Nice.....

    ReplyDelete
  47. Overall, a free YouTube to mp3 converter website can be a useful tool for anyone who wants to listen to their favorite YouTube videos as audio files. It is easy to use, free, and can save users time and data.

    ReplyDelete
  48. I totally agree! It's like missing a doctor appointment and then finally realizing the consequences years later. Krugman may have taken too long to speak up, but at least he's using his platform to raise awareness now. It's never too late to make a difference.

    ReplyDelete
  49. Krugman's overdue recognition of ERP solutions in Saudi Arabia echoes industry voices. As businesses thrive, tailored ERP systems streamline Saudi operations. It's time to leverage these tools for efficient growth.

    ReplyDelete
  50. Use this beginner's guide to sell on amazon without inventory to learn how to generate a full-time or passive income without owning any inventory.

    ReplyDelete
  51. The therapeutic benefits of crafting are well-documented, offering a respite from the stresses of daily life and providing a sense of accomplishment and fulfillment. Engaging in a hands-on activity such as folding gum wrappers into hearts allows us to disconnect from screens and immerse ourselves in the present moment, focusing our attention on the task at hand and experiencing the satisfaction that comes from creating something with our own two hands.

    How to Make a Heart with a Gum Wrapper

    ReplyDelete
  52. I am grateful to Native Assignment Help UK for the unique Business Assignment Help UK and the team of their experienced writers demonstrated the highest degree of professionalism by delivering a well-crafted assignment that surpassed my expectations. It was evident that they had done an extensive-research and that their writings were clear and followed the instructions properly which indicated that they aimed at the quality when doing this work. Moreover, I have also gained confidence in them due to their timely delivery and lower prices as compared to other writing services. Even so, Native Assignment Help has understood very well how challenging it can be for students who are tasked with completing business-related assignments; they therefore provide a full range of assistance aimed at making sure that such tasks result in academic success. Accordingly, I recommend these service providers to any student looking for top-notch aid in UK. Thank you for your invaluable support towards my success. Just contact our Business Assignment Helper UK which is dedicated to this purpose alone. With seasoned professionals, we offer custom-made assistance that caters to all aspects of your education. Our experts are knowledgeable in diverse fields of business and therefore guarantee deep research and strong analysis for each assignment given. Within our organization, we prioritize on an excellent performance as well as punctuality while doing reports that are interesting or case studies on complicated topics.

    ReplyDelete
  53. Krugman's belated critique of media treatment towards Clinton feels overdue and lacks the urgency needed to address longstanding biases.
    Struggling with your law essay? Look no further than Native Assignment Help's online Law essay writing services and Our team of seasoned writers specializes in providing top-notch assistance for law students. Whether you need help conducting research, crafting compelling arguments, or polishing your writing, we've got you covered. Our writers possess in-depth knowledge of legal concepts and meticulous attention to detail, ensuring your essays are well-researched, structured, and impeccably written for help with law essay writing. From ideation to the final draft, we'll be your trusted partner throughout the writing process for top-notch help with law essay writing and Say goodbye to essay woes and embrace academic excellence with our premier law essay writing service providing expert law essay writing service.

    ReplyDelete
  54. "The Daily Howler" is a captivating podcast that provides insightful commentary and analysis on current events and cultural phenomena, keeping listeners informed and engaged every day.
    I was finding it difficult to generate interesting Research Proposal Topics from Native Assignment Help UK, but their proficiency and direction enabled me to prepare an excellent proposal that impressed my teachers. Moreover, New Assignment Help UK gave Research Proposal Ideas that triggered my imagination and guided me in the right direction. With their help, I not only met the expectations but surpassed them, earning praise for my well-researched and original work. I would strongly advise one to make use of their services for top-quality academic help

    ReplyDelete