At Slate, Name Withheld sounds off: We'll file it under the colorful heading, "Can't get past the headline."
The headline(s) in question say this:
Why Isn’t Hillary Clinton Even Angrier?Name Withheld is very angry—today. Back then, she was the person who joined Chris Hayes in saying the New York Times' report about the scary uranium deal was a "bombshell."
In What Happened, Clinton takes on the obsessive demand that she assume responsibility for the 2016 election. But we can’t move on.
(The gigantic report was a world-class journalistic fraud. It had literally been funded by Bannon! But so what? The report had appeared in the New York Times! Deference had to be paid!)
It's hard to get past the headline on that. That said, our discourse is silly, incompetent, pitiful, faux pretty much all the way down.
The children have never been willing to fight. This helped put you-know-who where he is. On the brighter side, they have good jobs. Mother and father are proud!
Why isn't Clinton even angrier? We'll substitute a different question:
Why wasn't Name Withheld angry back then at all?