SATURDAY, AUGUST 16, 2025
Then K.T. McFarland showed up: K. T. McFarland doesn't vote the way we do—but also, she's no dope.
Nor is she a household name. The leading authority on the topic offers a bit of her background:
K. T. McFarland
Kathleen Troia McFarland (born July 22, 1951) is an American political commentator, civil servant, author, and former political candidate.
McFarland began her political career in the 1970s as a night-shift typist and assistant press liaison for National Security Council staff. In the 1980s, during the Reagan administration, she worked in the Department of Defense as a speechwriter and served as Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for Public Affairs.
[...]
Kathleen Troia was born on July 22, 1951, in Madison, Wisconsin, where she grew up as the oldest of four siblings...She graduated from Madison West High School in 1969.
Troia studied at the Elliott School of International Affairs of the George Washington University in Washington, D.C. In 1970, she worked part-time at the Nixon White House for Henry Kissinger's National Security Council staff...Intrigued by U.S. foreign policy and Nixon's 1972 China visit, Troia majored in Chinese studies, graduating from George Washington in 1973.
After working in the Ford administration, Troia studied on scholarship at Oxford University, where she earned a combined master's degree in Politics, Philosophy, and Economics.
Troia attended the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. While there, she studied nuclear weapons, China, and the Soviet Union for three years, but did not complete her Ph.D.
Time spent at GW, Oxford and M.I.T. help suggest the possibility that McFarland is no dope. According to the leading authority, things did come apart, to a substantial extent, when she ran for the Senate:
In 2006, McFarland ran in the Republican primary in the United States Senate election in New York for a seat held by Democrat Hillary Clinton. She was a late entrant who was recruited once the candidacy of the leading Republican, Westchester County District Attorney Jeanine Pirro, imploded.
...She ran into trouble with a March 2006 comment that appeared to allege that the Clinton campaign had been flying helicopters low over her Southampton, New York, house and spying on her, or that Clinton forces had rented an apartment across from her $18 million duplex on Park Avenue; she later said she had been joking, but the episodes upset her. The race between McFarland and her opponent, former Yonkers Mayor John Spencer, was ugly.
McFarland's candidacy was plagued by allegations that she overstated her credentials. Specifically, The New York Times reported that McFarland's claim that she had written part of Ronald Reagan's "Star Wars" speech was false, that her contention that she had been the highest-ranking woman of her time at the Reagan Pentagon was false, and that her claim that she had been the first female professional staff member of the Senate Armed Services Committee was false. Also, the Spencer campaign objected to her assertion that she had held a civilian rank equivalent to that of a three-star general.
McFarland's inconsistent record of voting in prior New York state elections also became an issue, with her having failed to vote in six of the past 14 elections. McFarland also unlawfully maintained voting addresses in two different places at the same time, sometimes voting in one municipality and sometimes voting in another. She emphasized that she had never voted twice in one election, promising to cancel one of her voter registrations. By late June, her campaign was nearly out of money, and she loaned $100,000 to the campaign. On August 22, McFarland suspended her campaign after her daughter was caught shoplifting in Southampton.
Yikes! That said, it has been a major part of American politics over the past thirty-three years:
The wheels have come off the Republican cart any time opposition to the endlessly demonized Hillary Clinton has been involved.
Back in December 2005, Judge Jeanine's campaign against Clinton had imploded. The candidacy of McFarland may have been even worse.
She went on to lose the race for the GOP nomination, and with it the chance to run against Clinton. That said, the years at Oxford and M.I.T. remain—and so it was when she appeared, this very morning, on the Fox & Friends Weekend program.
Let's go ahead and say their names! The friends this morning were these:
Fox & Friends Weekend
Charlie Hurt: co-host, Fox & Friends Weekend
Rachel Campos-Duffy: co-host, Fox & friends Weekend
Johnny Joey Jones: Fox News contributor
As required by Fox News Channel law, the friends had been gushing about President Trump's masterstrokes in Alaska.
The program started at 6 a.m.; as required by corporate law, the friends were soon gushing hard. At 6:12, they played tape of the aforementioned Hillary Clinton
She loves this war, Campos-Duffy said. She said that Clinton had "set a trap" for President Trump with her recent statement about nominating him for a Nobel prize if he manages to end the war in the way she described.
In short, things were proceeding as planned as the morning started. After Campos-Duffy spent some time trashing Barack Obama ("He's so uncool"), extremely clueless remarks about the logic of congressional districting followed at 6:14.
The day was proceeding as planned. And then, dear God! At 6:25, McFarland, a foreign policy specialist, was brought on to discuss the miracles which had occurred in Alaska.
McFarland did time at Oxford and M.I.T.—and no, she isn't a dope. On this occasion, dear God
She quickly seemed to say that things hadn't gone all that well!
Plainly, she said that in her opening statement, in which she said that the summit of the midnight sun had turned out to be "not that great."
The summit was "not what I hoped for," the Oxford grad now said!
Eventually, McFarland scrambled to make things right in certain predictable ways. First, though, she provided the kind of respite which occurs, on extremely rare occasions, on group propaganda programs like the channel's Fox & Friends Weekend.
As we post, we can't yet link you to videotape of what McFarland said. We can't yet provide a transcript of her complete remarks.
That said, for one brief shining moment, an unplanned event occurred. A guest had come on this "cable news" show and had wandered away from pure script.
Let us quickly add this:
When a brutal war like this war in underway, there is no single unassailable way to seek its resolution. One person might think that Ukraine should fight on against the Russian bear. Someone else may think that the overall game has been lost—that Ukraine should start feeding the beast.
There's no scientific formula which lets us compute the perfect way to proceed from here. But on messaging programs like Fox & Friends Weekend—on messaging programs like Fox News @ Night—politely scripted corporate stooges come on the air and say the things their owners want them to say.
Question to self:
Have we ever seen anything stupider than the segment which ended last evening's Fox News @ Night? We expect to show you what was said at the start of the week.
The village Stoopnagles were out in force during that final segment. As if the official Stoopnagles weren't pathetic enough, Trace Gallagher then read a set of text messages from a set of scripted viewers.
The stupidification of the American nation is underway at such times. Also numbered among the offenders are the Blue American stars who have agreed that what happens on Fox must stay on Fox—that this corporate conduct must never be reported, critiqued or discussed.
Alaska was a perfect 10, President Trump had said. Campos-Duffy quoted his statement several times—and then, up jumped McFarland!
Making a aet of reasonable observations, she instantly wandered off course.
Regarding what will flow from yesterday's event, we think today of Sandburg's Lincoln. We refer to Sandburg's description of what would happen, out in Coles County, Illinois, where Lincoln's beloved stepmother lived.
We refer to his account of what would happen as the months went by after her boy—"he was all of a son to her"—had stroked her face a last time, and had then gone away, off to the White House, from which he would never return:
The sunshine of the prairie summer and fall months would come sifting down with healing and strength; between harvest and corn-plowing there would be rains beating and blizzards howling; and then there would be silence after snowstorms with white drifts piled against the fences, barns, and trees.
What will happen in Ukraine after yesterday's perfect 10? You won't likely hear it said on Fox & Friends Weekend, but quite possibly this:
The drone attacks will still rain down on the hospitals and the kindergartens. We'll be two weeks away from being two weeks away from being told what might take place, or possibly not, during Vladimir's next phone call.
Or then again, maybe not.
Sandburg's fuller passage: Sandburg was a poet biographer. As Lincoln said that last goodbye, Sandburg's fuller picture was this:
The next day Lincoln drove eight miles out to the old farm along the road over which he had hauled wood with an ox team. He came to the old log house he had cut logs for and helped smooth the chinks; from its little square windows he had seen late winter and early birds.
Sally Bush and he put their arms around each other and listened to each other’s heartbeats. They held hands and talked; they talked without holding hands. Each looked into eyes thrust back in deep sockets. She was all of a mother to him.
He was her boy more than any born to her. He gave her a photograph of her boy, a hungry picture of him standing and wanting, wanting. He stroked her face a last time, kissed good-by, and went away.
She knew his heart would go roaming back often, that even when he rode in an open carriage in New York or Washington with soldiers, flags or cheering thousands along the streets, he might just as like be thinking of her in the old log farmhouse out in Coles County, Illinois.
The sunshine of the prairie summer and fall months would come sifting down with healing and strength; between harvest and corn-plowing there would be rains beating and blizzards howling; and then there would be silence after snowstorms with white drifts piled against the fences, barns, and trees.
Her astonishing stepson would never come back. With respect to that final meeting, that's the way the poet imagined and told it.
With that in mind at this terrible time, Professor Brown said it long ago:
Our civilization has to be "renewed by...the undemocratic but sovereign power of the imagination, by the undemocratic power which makes poets the unacknowledged legislators of all mankind, the power which makes all things new."
We have to feel our way out of this mess. We can't just rattle script.
ReplyDelete"SATURDAY: Trump's summit had been a perfect 10!"
Indeed it has been. Restoring diplomatic relations with a nuclear superpower, after years of idiot-Democrat-neocon insanity of nuclear brinkmanship? That's precisely 10 of 10, as far as I'm concerned.
Great job, Mr. President, and keep draining the swamp, please.
Trump's the worst negotiator in the history of the world. Putin got the entire United States of America, in exchange for lying to Trump about how smart he is.
DeleteDon't forget that Putin also put Trump into the presidency in the first place, which cost a lot of money and other resources, so that he could use Trump to snatch Ukraine from the free world. It isn't as if Trump would have been elected without Putin's help during two campaigns (2016 & 2024).
DeleteAlexander Darchiev is the current Russian ambassador to the US, serving since 6 March 2025.
DeleteThe Russian embassy is located at 2650 Wisconsin Avenue, Northwest, Washington, D.C., and oversees consulates in New York and Houston. Embassy of Russia, Washington, D.C. Washington, D.C. 2650 Wisconsin Avenue, N.W.
The current U.S. Ambassador to Russia is Lynne Tracy. She was confirmed by the Senate in December 2022. Tracy replaced John Sullivan, who departed in early September of the same year.
Why were American diplomats not included in the meeting with Putin and vice versa? Why are no records kept of meetings between Trump, his staff, and Putin? Why did Trump meet secretly with Putin without anyone else present?
DeleteIt appears the President of the US cannot meet with our nation's traditional enemy without breaking both laws and traditions. I want a president who operates within the law, who doesn't pal around with despicable people such as Putin and Epstein.
This is not the way a president should behave. I did not vote for Trump, I do not want him representing our nation or imposing his criminal ways on our government. I want him gone.
Having been at Oxford and MIT proves a woman is "not a dope" according to Somerby. What if she had attended a lesser college? Would she be a dope then? How much proof is required to call a female person not a dope? Why does college attendance prove this but real life screw-ups not disprove it? Trump is manifestly a dope, but he went to Wharton.
ReplyDeleteThis is a silly formulation. McFarland does seem like a dope, as Somerby portrays her, despite her college credential (which Somerby implies got her on TV, not her prior Republican service). We don't need McFarland to tell us Trump's meeting with Putin was a bust. But why does a female commentator need to be proclaimed "not a dope" at all? Shouldn't that be assumed, the way it is for men?
And most of all, why does Somerby fail to mention that K.T. McFarland was deputy National Security Advisor to Trump during his first term, in 2017? That seems like her most pertinent qualification to be commenting this current foreign relations debacle between Trump and Putin. Instead Somerby repeats her Oxford, MIT, GW University connections over and over, as if that were her only basis for commenting on Trump's failure.
Somerby is a clown. Sandburg has nothing to do with Ukraine. McFarland had better credentials as a former Trump advisor than her college attendance, but Somerby won't tell his readers that. His mocking tone suggests she has no reason to be on TV talking discussing foreign relations. Somerby is deceptive and cannot be trusted when he omits facts easily found using Wikipedia to undercut a Trump critic who is just saying what is obvious -- Trump's meeting bombed.
"His mocking tone suggests she has no reason to be on TV talking discussing foreign relations."
DeleteShe doesn't.
"McFarland had better credentials as a former Trump advisor than her college attendance"
Being a former Trump advisor qualifies you as a clown. Full stop.
This is more true in this administration than during his first term in office.
DeleteWhat if she attended a lesser college, you ask. Yeah, I would say that if she graduated from Trump University she would be considered beyond dumb. What is your point? You seem to want to engage in foolish argument.
DeleteWhat about your alma mater, the Soros-bot academy?
DeleteButt-hurt trolls are hilarious!
Delete2:04 went to the Soros-bot academy? Then they must know Scott Bessent.
Delete"Stoopnagle and Budd were a popular radio comedy team of the 1930s, who are sometimes cited as forerunners of the Bob and Ray style of radio comedy.
ReplyDeleteStoopnagle was played by American actor F. Chase Taylor. His character, Col. Stoopnagle, was portrayed as a wise idiot.
stoopnagle from en.wikipedia.org
Somerby seems to have dropped the "wise" part and is using the word to describe only an idiot.
Delete"We have to feel our way out of this mess. We can't just rattle script."
ReplyDeleteThis is gibberish. Poets are not literally legislators. The feelings of the public are reflected in polling and demonstrations, and on the right, shootings. Are these a more valid measure of public sentiment than votes? I don't think so. Meanwhile, the public has turned on Trump. If other Republicans were not bought and paid for, or living in fear due to death threats, we might turn this country around. When troops are occupying Los Angeles and Washington DC, the feelings of the public have less chance of expression and force becomes the coin of the realm.
Instead of calling vague people Stoopnagles, Somerby should be urging that Republicans give Trump his long overdue cognitive evaluation and invoke the Article 25, so that we can undo the harm to our country. Courage is sadly lacking in Congress, so we may have to wait for Gavin Newsom to be elected. What will Trump do between now and then? Stoopnagle only knows!
Trump called Norway and conflated his receipt of the Nobel Prize with lowering Norwegian tariffs. Extortion is not dealmaking. Trump needs to be removed.
ReplyDeleteLetting Trump get away with raping children, has led us to this moment.
ReplyDeleteFrom Jeff Tiedrich's Week in Stupid:
ReplyDelete"tuesday: new Biden scandal drops
private citizen Joe Biden recently visited an ice cream store near his home, and Fox News decided it would be a fun thing to mock him for it.
slow news day, Fox? was there no other way to avoid talking about the current president’s dead pedo bestie problem?
Fox News found object Jesse Watters is pissing himself with glee in this clip, because Sleepy Brandon was caught on camera drinking a milkshake with a straw — which just happens to be one of the seventeen hundred godzillion things that Watters insists no ‘real’ man should ever do.
fact check: fuck straight off, Jesse.
for fuck’s sake, you ghouls, it’s time to leave Joe Biden alone.
the only thing you need to know about Fox News’ creepy obsession with Joe is that Donny Convict’s name is on every page of the Epstein Files."
Trump himself rated his summit a "10" but no one else has. Somerby need not pick on K.T. McFarland when the rest of punditocracy is all singing the same tune. Trump got played by Putin and Trump looks old & tired.
ReplyDeletePity the poor pundits who have to fill air time and columns with news of the meeting, when there is no news. Trump's and Putin's bland comments gave no clue as to what was or wasn't achieved.
ReplyDeleteWhen Trump's comments are bland, you know there's absolutely nothing going on. The man is not subtle.
DeleteGov't work force declines
ReplyDeleteBy the end of 2025, the Trump administration likely will have shed around 300,000 workers, Office of Personnel Management Director Scott Kupor told Reuters on Thursday.
The mass departures, which Kupor claimed were largely accounted for by voluntary buyouts rather than firings, would constitute a 12.5 percent reduction of the federal workforce from when President Trump was inaugurated in January.
That percentage is a bit of an exaggeration as the Biden Administration went on a massive hiring spree as they headed out the door. So the 12.5 percent reduction will be down from an all-time high.
12.5% is not nearly enough. The goal should be between 90 and 95%. That'd be a real draining of the swamp.
DeleteSo, 300k done, 2.5 million to go. There's still time.
DiC thinks that shrinking the government work force by declaring a masses of workers to have been incompetent at their jobs despite positive work ratings is a good thing. Would love to turn back the clock and boot his ass out of his insurance industry job with a false and demeaning allegation. What a f-ing loser.
DeleteDid Trump shrink the workforce by force? That would assume that the worker owns her or his job, and Trump wrested it away from the person who owns it. Emotionally many of us feel that we own our jobs, but it isn't so legally. IMO it isn't so morally, either. Our employer, who paid us a salary up until today has the legal and moral right to stop paying us in the future. It's not a pleasant experience, as I well know.
DeleteThere is such a thing as wrongful termination. Employment is a contract between worker and employer and there are expectations on both sides, whether written or not
DeleteYou live in a world in which an employer can lie about the performance of an employee to justify firing him. No big deal to you, apparently. But hiring Hegseth, Kennedy and dozens of others without qualifications, to hire many additional government employees without qualifications is par for the course.
DeleteThey are qualified. They swore their oath to The Orange Turd. That is all that matters now no matter what gets fucked up in the process.
DeleteDavid in Cal is correct.
DeleteIt's time to let our sweet little child, Israel, stand on it's own two feet without being propped-up by our tax dollars.
Also, deficit, deficit, deicit.
What are we going to do about it, other than give huge tax breaks to woke Disney, cut our defense expenditures in half, and tell Israel to drop dead?
The guy who threw a Subway sandwich in DC was charged with Assault on a Police Officer. He should have used a sodium-free sandwich.
ReplyDeleteHe was released the same evening on his own recognizance because the judge agreed that he was being overcharged.
Deleteis that a joke aimed at the DC police?
DeleteGlad me was released. What he did looks to me like a misdemeanor, not a felony. I believe he was fired from job. That's a significant punishment
DeleteGlad you was released, David. Didn’t even know you was arrested.
DeleteIf I was in charge I would have thrown away the key to keep that rancid piece of shit, David in Cal, locked up.
DeleteLike a regular Nicaraguan in a foreign gulag.
DeletePeople who are not evil fascist assholes do not make fascist jokes, David in Cal.
DeleteHe should have thrown a brick sandwich at the filthy pig.
DeleteObligatory, "That cop was no angel."
DeleteThe latest analysis of DOGE is that in the end it only cut about $1.4 billion, while costing hundreds of billions (and eventually causing the death of millions due to cuts in healthcare services).
ReplyDeleteAnd even that $1.4 billion has been returned to federal agencies, per orders from court rulings.
https://www.politico.com/news/2025/08/12/trump-doge-contract-claims-savings-inflation-00498178?ICID=ref_fark&fbclid=PAQ0xDSwMKFVhleHRuA2FlbQIxMQABp0wn5l4ooOoymq8KY3wO2OwXg1TLJ_0pVW4nqrR78sMzERCAKAMtiayYt2vt_aem_JD8KU504N4mhw77cWflm6w&utm_content=link&utm_medium=website&utm_source=fark
Musk has slunk back to Tesla, his man boobs in tow, but it is too late - Tesla is headed towards bankruptcy, nobody wants to buy Tesla anymore.
womp womp
The Trump admin left highly sensitive information about the Putin/Trump summit in a hotel printer; the Trump admin is no better than a bunch of Keystone Cops, but at least we can chuckle over how the docs left behind provided phonetic pronunciation for Trump on how to say "Putin": "Mr. President POO-tihn"
Bwahahahahahahahaha
too funny!
They might have left that stuff in the printer because it was about the luncheon that was cancelled. Either that, or they cancelled the lunch because the details were left in the printer, compromising security of the event. I doubt the phonetic pronunciation was for Trump. There were other scheduled attendees.
DeleteI have read some dumb conjecture but come on man. They just screwed up.
DeleteAgain.
DeleteThe Keystone Kops were funny. The Republican Party is a global pedophile ring (not funny).
DeleteBob, what his followers want is the images and feelings they're getting, not his "policies". They're only just starting to find out about some of those now. Give it a Freidman Unit.
ReplyDeleteSomerby types furiously, yet to no avail, Epstein news keeps coming out every day, drip, drip, drip...
ReplyDeleteSomerby finds Lincoln "astonishing", but the only astonishing thing about Lincoln is that he was a Republican with integrity.
Of course, this is back before Republicans flipped and became right wingers.
But let's qualify Lincoln's integrity, Lincoln in fact believed that Whites were superior to Blacks, he stated this plainly. To Lincoln's credit, even though he thought Blacks were inferior, he did not think they should be enslaved. Astonishing!!!!
Going by Somerby's low bar, pretty much anything is astonishing.
Indeed, one can't help but notice that Somerby himself seems desperate for someone, anyone, to find him astonishing, as he withers away, consumed by his hatefulness and bitterness.
With all the people saying the same thing about Trump's poor summit meeting, why would Somerby single out K.T. McFarland for abuse?
DeleteCount me as astonished.
DeleteKT McFarland is a dope.
DeleteNo, silly rabbit, women aren't allowed to be pope.
DeleteWatch the film The Conclave on that topic.
DeleteWhat it must be like to be able to discern people's motives, not from what they write, but by being able to peer into the innermost recesses of their hearts. I envy you. We all do.
ReplyDeleteUnclear who you are talking to. Were you unable to stick your comment under the statements that upset you? Are you envying Somerby? That's what it sounds like.
DeleteI’m making a general observation.
DeleteI do not believe it is possible to peer into anyone's heart but people do reveal their motives through their behavior. Writing is one form of behavior. There are others. There are people who study behavior in order to figure out people's motives. They test their ideas against what people subsequently do, rather than assuming they know what is true for a person.
DeleteThe ability to assess the intentions of other people is part of what is called "theory of mind." Even children learn to figure out why others behave as they do, guess what they want and attribute motives their actions. Inability to do this is dangerous because judgments about who is a friend and who is an enemy, who wishes us well and who wants out stuff or considers us a threat to them, all affect the ability to survive in more primitive societies as well as today's complex ones. It takes practice learning to assess others' intentions, with feedback about the accuracy of guesses.
The people who study this stuff are experts in social psychology and developmental psychology.
2:37 has advanced a hypothesis that Somerby is writing about subjects other than Epstein to distract his readers from thinking about Epstein.
DeleteThe hypothesis is not based on anything Somerby has written, nor presumably (unless they're a friend of Bob) on any aspect of Bob's behavior.
What's left? Peering-into-a-man's-heart-from-a-distance.
I think it is based on what Somerby has been doing, and Somerby's behavior is subject to interpretation, just like anyone's is. Somerby is supposedly liberal yet he never talks about Epstein himself here, even when others are doing so elsewhere. Somerby picks up and runs with trivialities, often the same issues Trump and his people are using to deflect talk about Epstein and Trump's role in Epstein's sex trafficking. Dems don't do that either. Somerby's behavior is here for everyone to see for themselves. And you can compare his behavior to other lefties and see whether he talks more or less than they do about Epstein and Trump's connection to him. That is all empirical evidence accessible to anyone who wants to get serious about cataloging Somerby's favorite topics. Plus Somerby has criticized others in the media for talking about Epstein, as if they shouldn't be doing that. It all adds up.
DeleteIf you don't want to think about this stuff, that if fine and you are free to avoid Epstein yourself, but you can't really defend Somerby without counting up his topics and seeing for yourself what Somerby has been talking about. And unless you do that, it is hard for you to say that 2:37 or anyone else is wrong when they suggest he is avoiding Epstein and dredging up other topics to help Trump distract from the Epstein story.
I avoid Epstein.
DeleteI doubt if Somerby has ever criticized others in the media for talking about Epstein. He does tend to criticize the media for dwelling too long on certain subjects, and Epstein would be a prime candidate there, since there have been panels and panels devoted to the subject even when there was simply no new information to be discussed.
DeleteThe only other substance in your argument is that Somerby himself doesn't discuss Epstein. And this is a point you seem not to understand: a writer should only write about something when they have something interesting or informative to say about it. Good writers don't write about something just because everyone else is.
That's all for now. Thinking about this stuff is very hard for me.
It is a lot easier to avoid Epstein since he was murdered in prison to protect the Felon.
DeleteDemocrats took some chances. It didn't work out and now they find themselves at the bottom of the heap.
DeleteRe: Epstein
DeleteThere was always something fishy about a story where the Republican Party seemed offended by child rape. That never made any sense.
A writer writes about Epstein when they want red voters to understand that they have elected a child sex predator as president.
Delete"Democrats took some chances. It didn't work out and now they find themselves at the bottom of the heap."
DeleteTrump couldn't win an election without a Russian dictator helping him. He couldn't fund his campaign without a Ketamine-addled billionaire helping him, who he then appointed to fire everyone in govt. It almost makes us proud to have lost the election in 2024.
Democrats may be "at the bottom of the heap" but we earn higher salaries in better jobs, have less crime, get divorced less, have better health, are less drug addicted, are the ones who end wars not start them, are the ones who end financial crises not start them, and are better educated (if not smarter). I get it that Republicans are jealous, but electing someone like Trump was self-defeating now that you guys are bearing the brunt of his mistakes in office. Trump is trying to persecute blue cities but it is the red state national guard members who are having their lives disrupted via deployment to DC when they could have been doing their normal activities and not having to risk their lives on the mean streets.
The folks who elected Trump are fools. We Dems at least do not have that on our conscience. Look what a good job Biden did for you ungrateful slobs!
Cope, Corby.
DeleteCorby changed his name to Forby and emigrated to the UK. You just missed him.
DeleteFrom today's Hartmann Report:
ReplyDelete"— Weird Alert! More Than Two Dozen People Linked to Jeffrey Epstein Have Died Under Mysterious Circumstances? That’s what The National Enquirer is reporting, and they appear to have the receipts. “Financier Steven Hoffenberg,” the Enquirer reports, “confessed in a final account before his death to the Enquirer’s Doug Montero that Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell, the convicted pedophile’s now-imprisoned recruiting madam, were ‘taping’ honey-trap videos of sleazy VIPs with underage girls for a cabal of deep-state blackmailing power brokers.” Of all the things that have Trump in a tizzy, this appears to be at the top of the list, particularly since Politico published a transcript of the lawsuit where a girl accused Trump under oath of violently raping her at Epstein’s place when she was only 13. The Feds are sitting on terabytes of data and hundreds, perhaps thousands, of hours of videotapes seized from Epstein during his last arrest. How many feature his “best friend” Donald Trump? Inquiring minds, as the saying goes, want to know."
https://hartmannreport.com/p/saturday-report-81625-california
Hartmann is one of our Blue Stars, someone Somerby doesn't ever read or acknowledge the existence of when he complains that we blues are pathetic.
Given his treatment of K.T. McFarland, Somerby is highly selective in his targets, ignoring accomplishments of women and those he dislikes in order to diminish them, then pretending that they do not exist. McFarland is part of red America, but Somerby's repetition of the phrase "she is not a dope" (implying that she IS a dope) isn't any kind of media criticism. It is farting around.
You are not a dope (this implies that you are a dope).
DeleteIt depends how many times you repeat it. Saying someone is not a dope, over and over, when there is no reason to be saying it, is sarcastic.
DeleteHe said it twice. Don't think that qualifies as over and over. Kind of undercuts your entire argument.
DeleteHe said it 3 times. And he said she wandered off at least twice. You are dishonest.
DeleteDopiest argument ever conducted by dopes.
DeleteYou say dopes, I say @9:00 is a liar.
DeleteI am a dope.
DeleteSorry, thought you said you were the pope. My mistake.
DeleteIsraeli official looks for child sex in Nevada, is allowed to go home.
ReplyDeletehttps://www.timesofisrael.com/senior-israeli-cyber-official-detained-in-las-vegas-as-part-of-child-solicitation-probe/
Trump makes another move that will reduce crime in DC
ReplyDeleteTrump Administration Brags They’ve Cut DC Carry Permit Issue Times From Months to Days
Here is what AI says:
Delete"Arguments that concealed carry permits may not reduce crime or may even increase it:
Increased violence:
Some research indicates that weakening concealed carry laws can lead to an increase in violent crime, including aggravated assault and homicide, according to the Violence Policy Center.
Risk of accidental shootings:
There are concerns that more concealed carry permits could lead to a rise in unintentional firearm injuries.
Increased gun theft:
Studies suggest that individuals with concealed carry permits are more likely to have their firearms stolen, potentially increasing the number of guns available to criminals.
Increased police shootings:
One study found that states with permitless carry laws experienced a 13% increase in fatal and nonfatal police shootings of civilians compared to states with stricter carry laws, according to Giffords.
"Overkill" effect:
Some research suggests that the presence of more legally carried firearms may lead to an increase in local crime rates.
Lack of evidence for self-defense:
Some studies indicate that self-defensive firearm use is remarkably rare and may not be socially beneficial.
Increased firearm homicides:
Some research suggests that an increase in concealed carry permits is linked to a rise in gun homicides. "
"Trump Administration Brags They’ve Cut DC Carry Permit Issue Times From Months to Days"
DeleteIs that supposed to be a good thing?
Go ahead and tell us how that reduces crime, knucklehead.
Deletehttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/More_Guns%2C_Less_Crime
DeleteBelieving Trump has a single fact based policy after all these years of learning he rules from his fat gut as his demented mind is long gone just proves how David in Cal refuses to face reality.
DeleteThe United States Research Council convened, partly in response to Lot's book and concluded that there was no correlation between the adaptation of concealed carry laws and reduced crime:
DeleteThe council determined that Lott's data sets can be subject to manipulation given a number of factors, so that different studies produce different results. "While the trend models show a reduction in the crime growth rate following the adoption of right-to-carry laws, these trend reductions occur long after law adoption, casting serious doubt on the proposition that the trend models estimated in the literature reflect effects of the law change."[3]
So, maybe citing a book by a gun advocate is not such a bright idea. The Rand corporation did an exhaustive study of the work done to date on this subject and found no support for Lott's conclusions, in fact the opposite.
https://www.rand.org/research/gun-policy/analysis/concealed-carry/violent-crime.html
You like to seek out work that confirms your biases.
Brilliant move by Trump.
DeleteNow all he has to do is cut Social Security benefits to start the shooting war.
Here is what Lev Parnas says the Alaska summit was about:
ReplyDelete""And now, even before the dust settles in Alaska, I hear from my sources that Trump is summoning Zelensky to the White House on Monday. The media will sell it as progress, as hope. But I’m telling you, it’s a trap."
He continued to outline what he sees as Trump's "plan" for the leader of Ukraine.
"And now, with Zelensky summoned to Washington, the danger is clear. They will try to corner him into a deal he cannot accept — a land swap, a false 'peace' carved out of Ukraine’s sovereignty. And when he refuses, they will paint him as the obstacle, the problem, the reason peace failed."
"That’s the plan. That’s what Alaska was really about," according to Parnas."
It may be that Trump will try to use Ukraine's obstinacy as an excuse to deny them aid, leaving them on their own.
Sounds sadly correct to me. It's unfortunately what I expected. Russia is in control, especially since Putin doesn't care how people he kills. So, Ukraine will face the choice of an unacceptable peace deal or a continued war. In the latter case hundreds of thousands more people will be killed and Russia will eventually win and take whatever part of Ukraine they want. Ugh!
DeleteThere is no guarantee that Russia will win if Ukraine keeps fighting. Ukraine does not stand alone, even if Trump abandons it. That is what NATO is about.
Delete4:50 is right. Russia's not guaranteed to win.
DeletePutin took one country under Obama and started a war for another under Biden so I believe that belongs to Democrats. President Trump started no wars only wants to stop killing prople. I think we get what a President should be like.
DeleteUkraine never had a chance. And if the only chance they have now is with NATO fighting the war for them, then that will be what has to happen. NATO will have to make their own decision if they want to invade Russia and when the war will start and what their plan is for winning it.
Delete@5:58 -You described the problem. What's your solution?
DeleteDemocrats didn't cause Putin to do anything. Just as Trump cannot prevent Putin from continuing his war of aggression now. Putin is a bad guy and he is the world's problem, not something Democrats caused.
DeleteMy solution is telling fascist insincere liar David to go fuck yourself you lousy piece of duplicitous shit.
Delete6:12 Trump had no problem droning the shit out of the middle east and Afghanistan, blowing up an Iranian General, etc. He is also a pussy and a total loser that kills everything he touches. He also released 5,000 of the wold's worst Muslim terrorists and had Pompeo negotiate the United Stated forces surrender to the Taliban that Biden bravely executed.
Deleteif Trump and his buddy Putin want to continue to align themselves against Zelensky and the leaders in Europe, that does not automatically concede territory to Russia. The war can go on.
Delete@9:21 “ war criminal breaking multiple treaties and targeting civilian targets over military targets”
DeleteAre you talking about the Gaza Palestinians?
Sounds more like Israel.
DeleteI can't wait for Hegseth to round up the Jews.
DeleteBibi & Putin, two war criminals in a matryoshka doll.
DeleteSelling Ukraine out to Putin will not make Epstein files go away.
ReplyDeleteSomeone needs to break it to Donnie that aligning himself with a fascist war criminal for a land grab, whether it's in Europe or the Mideast, will not result in a Nobel Peace Prize.
ReplyDeleteFrom Robt Reich this Sunday morning:
ReplyDelete"Another thing we can do is stop recognizing him as president.
He may occupy the Oval Office, but he has repeatedly violated his oath of office to “faithfully execute the Office of President of the United States, and … preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States."
He sends the National Guard into Washington, D.C., on the pretext that the city is overrun with crime when its crime rate has plummeted to its lowest in 30 years.
He supports Vladimir Putin’s demand that Ukraine cede territory it controls to Russia, thereby rewarding Putin’s aggression and breaking with our European allies.
He orders ICE to “disappear” people — including American citizens — into detention camps and foreign jails.
He instructs Republican governors to super-gerrymander in order to gain more Republican seats so Republicans have better odds of staying in control of Congress after the 2026 midterms.
He usurps the constitutional power of Congress to dispense federal funds.
He usurps its authority to regulate commerce with foreign nations.
He takes personal gifts from foreign powers, also in direct violation of the Constitution.
He invites corporate executives to give him personal gifts in return for government favors. He and his family make a fortune on cryptocurrencies, which he has officially encouraged.
He smothers criticism of him and his regime. He attacks universities, media corporations, and law firms that have offended him. He fires public servants who tell the truth.
This is the same man who attempted a coup against the United States less than five years ago: refusing to accept the outcome of the 2020 election, telling Republican governors and secretaries of state to change election returns and his vice president not to certify the results, encouraging a violent assault on the U.S. Capitol, and later pardoning all who were found guilty of participating in that assault.
By repeatedly violating his oath of office, he has relinquished the presidency.
His presidency is illegitimate.
We must disavow our allegiance to him.
We don’t yet have the votes to impeach him, but we should stop referring to him as President Trump. Urge others to do so as well.
We will not fall for his strongman bullshit. He wants us to think he’s invincible and that we can’t stop him. But we won’t allow him to intimidate us, and we will stop him.
He wants to make us so cynical and hopeless that we give up our opposition to him. But that we will never do. We will keep fighting.
We will assume that everything he says is a lie. Ditto for his “spokespeople.” And for his White House staff and Cabinet. We will never fall for or repeat his lies.
We will not even listen to him. When he’s about to speak, we’ll turn off whatever device we have. We will not even read accounts of what he says, because they are meaningless drivel.
We’ll pay attention only to what he does. We’ll take whatever nonviolent action we can to stop him from trampling on our rights and freedoms.
I say all this more in sorrow than in anger. We are living through a profound tragedy. America is suffering a grievous loss.
Some day we will once again have a president.
We will support people of integrity who seek the highest office in the land. People who will honor their oath of office."
"Hey, you forgot about me!" Ross Ulbricht.
DeleteI remember too well the halcyon days when instead of a so called president laying out the red carpet on American soil for a war criminal, the Republican Congress invited one to the floor to wag his finger at Obama for having a shred of empathy for the Palestinians.
ReplyDeleteObama certainly is a war criminal. And so is Genocide Joe. Along with, according to Noam Chomsky, every other post-war president ("If the Nuremberg laws were applied, then every post-war American president would have been hanged.")
DeleteWhat are you Soros-bots unhappy about?
Quoting Noam Chomsky as a Trump cultist is rich. And every jaywalker is a criminal, right, Boris?
DeleteTriggered, Hillary?
DeleteDuring her campaign, Hillary said she had shot a gun while hunting, but didn't carry one for personal safety. Her well-considered attitudes toward guns are one reason why I admire her, voted for her and wish she had become president instead of Trump. I would be proud if someone mistook me for her, even on the internet where such mistakes are easy to make.
DeleteDoes Hillary have bodyguards who do carry guns?
DeleteYes, but Hillary does not pull the trigger.
DeleteFuck off DiChead, you lying fucktard.
DeleteTriggered again, Hillary?
DeleteI don't think David likes it much when you call him Hillary.
DeleteIn 2016 Hillary said the Trump was Putin's puppet. This past weekend we were again treated to Putin pulling the strings and making Trump dance like the treasonous ignorant fool he is. Hillary was right about everything.
Delete“ Folks in our nation’s capital are already feeling safer since President Donald Trump, mere days ago, started cracking down on crime in Washington, D.C….
ReplyDelete“Went on a run through DC tonight. Insane amount of people out doing the same,” James Laverty posted to X on Thursday. “Cops everywhere but the vibe was different. People feel safe again. Common sense prevails.”
Source https://www.dailywire.com/news/folks-in-d-c-already-feeling-safer-praise-trump-for-crime-crackdown?topStoryPosition=undefined&author=Amanda+Prestigiacomo&category=News&elementPosition=1&row=1&rowHeadline=Top+Stories&rowType=Top+Stories&title=Folks+In+D.C.+Already+Feeling+Safer%2C+Praise+Trump+For+Crime+Crackdown
DeleteNot everyone feels safe around the police.
DeleteHalf of those arrested were on immigration violations. Half of the remainder were on gun charges. That leaves very few actual crime-related arrests. That is too few to provide any real improvement in safety on the streets, so this "vibe" is illusory.
Ironic that the president had to break the law about use of federal troops in order to make a few people feel safer. It is wrong for the person elected president to model crime for hiis people by engaging in so many illegal acts. Law and order should start at the top but our president is the lawbreaker in chief, a man who pardons other criminals and who welcomes an international criminal with a warrant on his head to Alaska, with open arms.
I don't feel safer with Trump as nominal president. I want our Congress to pursue impeachment so that we can have a man of integrity in office, not a criminal. I want the Epstein files released so that we can see how many times Trump's name appears in them. I want the streets to be safe from ICE threatening my neighbors. Law enforcement shouldn't be wearing masks like any common criminal -- that is common sense.
This has gone too far. When will Congress act? We are not a police state or a banana republic. The army should be in its barracks or protecting our nation from external threats, not threatening citizens as the private bullies of our chief criminal, Trump. He is not our president any more. All that remains is for him to leave office.
This is not law and order. It is bullying and tyranny. Watch the video if you have the stomach for watching 4 ICE agents beat up a delivery guy:
Deletehttps://digbysblog.net/2025/08/17/a-festival-of-cruelty/
"ICE snatched a high school student while he was walking his dog.
DeleteAgents tied Benjamin Marcelo Guerrero-Cruz’s dog to a tree, and for extra fuckery, unclipped the collar—letting him run loose on a busy street.
According to his family, agents joked during his arrest that “thanks to him, they get to drink this weekend,” and laughing about the $2,500 they just secured."
This is what happens when you have untrained people involved in law enforcement, enticing them with bonuses, and no supervision or accountability.
"ICE arrest father waiting to pick-up kid at elementary school.
DeleteSchool staff had to sort out arrangements for student left behind.
"They're very little—to not get picked up by your parent is very traumatizing."
"There’s a reason why they wear masks—they know it’s wrong to do."
This is now the second arrest outside a local elementary school in a week.
This incident occurred outside Linda Vista Elementary School in San Diego, California. "
https://www.youtube.com/shorts/8Y3imj6bYP8
DeleteIf it sounds like a good thing when the right announces law enforcement activities, take a closer look at what is actually happening. These are not people contributing to crime statistics, but children and parents and law-abiding citizens being attacked by men in masks for non-crimes such as posting on social media or picking up kids from school or walking the dog. How does it help anyone to mistreat these people?
Delete"This is what happens when you have untrained people involved in law enforcement" @11:27- the officer who killed George Floyd was well-trained. Yes, terrible mistakes occur in the course of law enforcement. But, what should be done? Should we stop enforcing laws?
DeleteInteresting example. George Floyd didn't break any laws justifying his violent arrest either. He was accused of passing a fake $20 bill in a convenience store. Disproportionate response is the theme here. Floyd knew better, as you point out. These new ICE recruits do not. Neither do the National Guard, who do not receive training in law enforcement techniques and thus endanger themselves and other people with their presence. The DC Police knows how to enforce laws. Let them do their job unmolested by Trump.
DeleteCorrection: Floyd's killer knew better (Floyd was the victim -- sorry for any confusion)
DeleteIn CA, an armed police officer is not allowed to shoot a fleeing suspect in the back while he is running away, unless there is a significant danger to the public, such as the fleeing suspect is a serial killer escaping to kill again. There have been too many situations where 15 year old kids are shot and killed fleeing out of fear, because they shoplifted or are carrying small quantities of drugs, or are innocent but afraid of being arrested, or perhaps are illegal. Cops are now being held accountable for not shooting people over trivial or unknown crimes. So, police are being trained on when to use restraint and how to deescalate conflicts and how to take people in later when they aren't running away but are watching TV at home. The stupidity of Noem/Trump in putting untrained people on the street with weapons is mind-boggling. Crime is not a good enough excuse for endangering the public with incompetent swaggering by bullies.
DeleteEnough is enough. This needs to stop. The main way to stop these street crimes by masked men claiming to be ICE (including rapists and muggers) is to remove Trump from office. The sooner the better.
"justifying his violent arrest either"
DeleteWhen you're being detained (or arrested), Soros-bot, your detention might go peacefully or violently, and that's your own choice, Soros-bot.
Capeesh?
You obviously didn't watch the video posted about earlier, the one where the delivery guy is beaten up by four (count them, FOUR) masked ICE agents, under the guise of law enforcement. You can get beaten up even while complying, in fact complying seems to frustrate and disappoint some cops and bullies. Your quaint belief that victims of police violence have earned their harsh treatment shows a degree of naivete that suggets you are 12 years old.
DeleteTony Soprano called and he wants his gangster spelling back.
Studies of law enforcement abuses suggest that the amount of adrenaline felt by the officer is what determines the over-reaction and subsequent beatings of suspect in custody. The adrenaline arises with fear, as during car chases or foot chases involving danger, where cops have no yet calmed down from their exertion. Inexperienced officers have not yet learned how to control their own physical over-responses to threat (imagined as well as real). Better control comes with experience, which national guard troops have not had to deal with.
DeleteHow well are the DC Police maintaining law? There is a range of assertions. @11:56 believes crime is being adequately controlled. Others say DC crime is out of control. As is far too common, the two sides disagree on the state of reality. Unreliable statistics add to the uncertainty. I'm not there, so my opinion just a question of who I choose to believe.
Deletehttps://www.nbcwashington.com/news/local/dc-police-union-head-tells-why-he-doubts-city-crime-statistics/3974181/
Right wingers got the head of the Police Union to support Trump's assertion that crime statistics were being faked. Just like he claims voting results are fake and BLS jobs reports are fake, whenever he has a motive that is not supported by numbers. The crime stats are not fake.
DeleteYou could believe people who live in DC. Or you could believe the DC Police force itself, headed by its police chief, or you could believe the Mayor of DC who has responsibility for crime in the city. They all disagree with Trump about the need to send troops into DC. Look at the demonstrations by those who live there. They want the troops out.
@12:04 - What's the evidence that ICE agents are untrained?
DeleteThe courts didn't believe Trump. They supported the right of the Police Chief to maintain control of the police force in the lawsuit brought to keep Trump from giving policing over to the National Guard. The court said it hadn't examine the stats closely but found no emergency situation to justify taking control away from the Police Chief.
DeleteDid I miss something, @12:30? I know such a suit was filed, but I did not know that it was decided.
DeleteDavid, watch the video. Does that look like the way trained law enforcement works? Second, the ads themselves recruiting ICE agents are requiring no previous law enforcement experience and no college degree, minimum age 18 yo (so no life experience either). The joking about cruelty, abuses of arrestees, political statements to bystanders such as "liberals ruined the country" (not permitted by police or military), failure to address the situation resonsibly, including people stranded through their actions (children not picked up, dog left loose, car left in the street, lawnmower left running on the grass, and so on) all suggest a lack of training that any other agency would not be permitted. Law enforcement is not the same as kidnapping people. Different rules apply, so different methods and techniques are needed. Police see themselves as partners with the community to serve and protect. ICE sees itself as getting rid of undesirables by deporting them, by any means necessary, without regard for consequences to the detainees or those left behind through their actions. ICE agents work for the bonuses not the ideal of helping people in need. Most police calls are about people in trouble not crimes committed, such as getting a child's head unstuck from a railing, finding an elderly person who has wandered away or finding a lost child, settling a dispute between fighting spouses or a drunken customer who is angry in a restaurant. Everyday policing situations require tact and diplomacy, not force and certainly not bullying. ICE agents are vigilantes who abuse their power. No one should have to explain this to you, David. That makes me suspect you are not writing in good faith but just advancing Trump's agenda.
Deletehttps://www.nytimes.com/live/2025/08/15/us/trump-administration-dc-news
DeleteThanks @12:51. I didn't read your comment carefully enough. As you said, the judge said the DC police chief should not report to the National Guard. You didn't say that the judge ruled that the National Guard should be removed.
DeleteFuck you fascist David.
DeleteIsn't The Felon supposed to pardon the cop that sat on Floyd's neck Dichead? What a POS you be.
DeleteSome men are dressing up as ICE agents and wearing masks to conceal their identities while raping women or engaging in theft, vandalism and other crimes. This is made possible by ICE's refusal to show badges or any kind of ID. That aspect of ICE's behavior terrifies the people interacting with them and also bystanders, which is what authoritarian states want to happen.
DeleteLegitimate use of police authority looks very different. Officers are polite and seek cooperation. They identify themselves and ask that citizens do the same (as opposed to ICE agents who refuse to look at detainee ID, even passports). They use force as a last, not a first resort, and only in well-defined situations. They don't typically verbally abuse those they interact with.
Using ICE agents in non-immigration situations is a very bad idea. It signals our transition from a free country to one dominated by fear, a police state. But the problem isn't only WHO is doing the policing but HOW they are doing it. The abusiveness of ICE agents is a trademark of bullying as control not policing.
David in Cal,
DeleteYes, that police officer who choked George Floyd to death was trained, but the mythical good guys with guns didn't know anything about it.
Which is only one reason no good guy with a gun stopped the filthy pig from killing an innocent man. The other reason is that there is no such thing as a good guy with a gun.
It was a marketing ploy, by gun manufacturers.
Here is Simon Rosenberg, another Blue Star on Substack, not cable news:
ReplyDelete"But here we are. For as I wrote yesterday this wild and dangerous late August spiraling is a sign of the disquiet in his mind, of a desperate need to do something to make him feel STRONG and POWERFUL as he sundowns, the economy slows, inflation rises, his administration fails and he grows more unpopular and distant:
There is something desperate about all this. Why can’t he play golf for a few weeks? He’s an old man with health problems. His gait was very wobbly yesterday, and as John Bolton said he looked very, very tired. My own take on why we are all here, why I am writing today rather than gardening and filling my bird feeders, is that Trump is aware that his powers are ebbing. He is in political, physical and cognitive decline. Elon emasculated him, repeatedly. He and his agenda are wildly unpopular. No matter how much he rages the economy is slowing down, prices are rising and the deficit exploding. ACA premiums are skyrocketing and our health care system is starting to buckle. An ideological follower of his fired 500 rounds - 500 - at the Center for Disease Control a few days ago. He still has not negotiated a single trade deal, not ended the war in Ukraine or Bibi’s murderous spree in Gaza. Putin keeps manhandling and humiliating him. House Republicans defied him in August, subpoenaed the Epstein files from the Department of Justice and then had to adjourn early to prevent further damage. He cannot make Epstein, Maxwell and his sordid past go away. Democrats have begun to step into their power.
This photo was taken yesterday. No burnt orange for the public, just him. An old and ridiculous man..."
Trump is, of course, playing golf again this weekend. Did MAGA know it was electing a part-time president?
If Congress doesn't have the guts to impeach Trump, it can just release the Epstein Files and let the public outrage against a president who sexually abused young girls push them into action. We deserve a real president, not a gradiose buffoon who cheats at golf and cannot tell when he is being played by Putin. There are good, competent men who could be our president but we have to watch in terror while this guy defiles the White House and goes through the motions of governing while stealing from the nation. We don't need a criminal president who uses the army to cover for his illegal acts.
Jeff Tiedrich compares the official story of Trump's meeting with Putin to the account of it now being circulated by Trump and his staff:
ReplyDelete[Photo of Trump and Putin shaking hands]
who the fuck thought this was a good idea?
‘let’s take a deteriorating old coot in serious cognitive decline, drag him out of bed at four in the morning, bundle him into Dipshit Force One and fly him thousands of miles to a despot playdate with a crafty old war criminal who has bested him every time they’ve previously met.’
and then what? just pray that Dear Leader doesn’t shit the bed?
yeah, well guess what: all that praying didn’t work. anyone hoping for a show of strength and resolve from America’s Mad King got this instead.
good boy, Donny. another iconic image for the ages, with the guy who walks you like a dog.
for fuck’s sake, Donny, you’re the president of the United States. square your shoulders, stand up straight and look at the camera. don’t slouch in defeat and stare at your feet like some toddler who’s ashamed of having done a boom-boom in his pants.
thank you for your attention to this matter, bro.
tell me, is it bad when even Fox News can’t sugar-coat a shit sandwich?
Fox News Reporter Jacqui Heinrich: “it was just very unusual, atypical, and I think we’re all awaiting, y’know, the readout. because the way that it felt in the room, um, was not good. it did not seem like things went well. and it seemed like Putin came in and steamrolled, got right into what he wanted to say, and got his photo next to the president and then left.”
isn’t it stunning to see a Fox reporter flummoxed by what they witnessed with their own two eyes?
for once, they couldn’t blame it on Joe Biden pointing his autopen in the direction of Anchorage and pressing the ‘fuck shit up’ button.
but wait — Jacqui Heinrich recovers a bit, and tries to do a little turd-polishing:
“of course, that is only the piece of the picture that we have right now. certainly President Trump, who is the host, and who is president, would not want to, I think, enable something that would make him look weak.”
fact check:
it’s a little too fucking late for that, Jacqui, but please continue.
“we are eagerly awaiting to hear the background on that. we also note that we didn’t see any scowls on the faces of the likes of Steve Witkoff or Secretary Rubio or any of the the other members of the US delegation.”
is that the story you want to go with, that Donny’s delegation didn’t seem concerned? because over at MSNBC, they’re telling quite a different tale.
Peter Alexander: “what struck me in particular was the looks on the faces of a lot of the American delegation here. Karoline Leavitt, the press secretary, Steve Witkoff, who came into the room, then left quickly, then came back in. Leavitt appeared to be a bit stressed out, anxious. their eyes were wide, almost ashen at times.”
Cont.
Delete"Donny’s handlers had a good reason to be wandering around looking shell-shocked. they’d gone to great lengths to make sure that Putin wouldn’t ever be alone with Mad King, and have the opportunity to talk the demented old doofus into doing something stupid, like giving Alaska back.
and then Donny fucked all that up by going off-script and inviting his despot bestie Vlad into the presidential limo for some one-on-one time.
how reckless is that? Donny invited our chief adversary into one of the most secure locations anywhere in American government.
so what went on in the limo, or in the closed-door meeting attended by Donny, Vlad, Witkoff and Rubio? anyone who wants to know is cordially invited to go fuck themselves until they’re blue in the face, because no one will say shit about it. they’ve locked themselves down. it’s another Epstein-Files-level cover-up.
all we know is they canceled the luncheon that was supposed to take place after the meeting, and they cut short the press conference, before any members of the media got a chance to ask pesky questions. they then hustled Donny back onto Air Force one and booked it the fuck back to Washington, DC as fast as that jet would go.
it must have been a fucking disaster.
all we have is Donny’s side of the story, and, as usual, it’s a big slice of bullshit pie."
"who the fuck thought this was a good idea?" That would be weirdo David in Cal.
DeleteAs far back as Eisenhower there were "summit meetings" between the leaders of US and Russia. Obama had one such meeting. In all cases, people approved of the meetings as conducive of better relations and avoiding conflict. But, some people today believe that everything Trump does is automatically bad.
DeleteI think the people today who believe Trump is doing bad things believe that because Trump is incompetent at summit meetings and actually is doing a bad job.
DeleteThere is no evidence that Trump achieved anything for the US by his recent meeting with Putin. How then is it a "10" as Trump called it? Trump himself said he was going to demand a ceasefire from Putin and he came home with nothing at all. That is a failure according to Trump's own goal.
Trump's staff was selected because they are loyal to him and support him as president. When they had a negative reaction to the meeting, they can't be dismissed as anti-Trump to begin with.
Trump may be avoiding personal conflict with Putin by appeasing him and giving him whatever he wants, from a private car-meeting to no more sanctions and no time deadlines or other demands, but this happened at Ukraine's expense. Trump put his own cordial relationship with Putin ahead of the needs of the Ukrainians, and he gave too much response to a war criminal who shouldn't have been treated as a friend or ally of the US when he has done nothing to help our country -- whatever he may have given Trump on a personal level. Trump perhaps thinks that he IS the USA, but we the people don't believe that his interests and our own are the same. Most of us want the war in Ukraine to end without Ukraine having to give away territory. Trump doesn't appear to have fought for that outcome in his meeting with Putin.
When no record is kept of the meeting, how can we know that Trump didn't sell us and the Ukrainians out to maintain "friendship" with Putin?
Cope, Corby.
DeleteNo, it was "Cope, Gorby" in those old days of summit meetings. Maybe before your time, @1:25.
DeleteTrump's meeting with Putin was a 10. On a scale from 10 to 75,000,000.
DeleteThis morning Trump said:
ReplyDelete"If I got Russia to give up Moscow as part of the Deal, the Fake News, and their PARTNER, the Radical Left Democrats, would say I made a terrible mistake and a very bad deal. "
Somerby too considers the left to be a partner to so-called Blue media, even though there is no alliance between the two, nothing comparable to what exists between Fox News and Republicans.
We on the left consider the non-Fox media to be "legacy media" or "corporate media," or even "mainstream media," but we have no left media corresponding to Fox on the right. The media is more centrist. There are left voices here and there, mostly in Independent media not on cable news or at newspapers such as the NY or LA Times.
So, when Somerby says what he does about the blue media, he is advancing a right wing meme, a talking point promoted by Trump himself, one that we liberals do not hold. The more frequently Somerby does this, the less he sounds like one of us on the left.
Learn to cope, Corby.
DeleteThis is for AC/MA and DG who cannot recognize when Somerby is promoting Trump's line. Somerby advances this idea nearly every day. These fanboys need to realize that it traces back to Trump.
Delete@2:04 -- I don't know who you are but you need to understand that calling other commenters Corby or Hillary doesn't hurt anyone's feelings the way you seem to think it should. I like both Corby and Hillary, so try again.
Corby needn't learn to cope. She needs to squeal harder.
DeleteLovely sentiment.
Delete"Somerby too considers the left to be a partner to so-called Blue media, even though there is no alliance between the two, nothing comparable to what exists between Fox News and Republicans."
DeleteDepends what you mean by the 'left'. If the left is Bernie and AOC, then no, there is no alliance with Blue media.
But if the left is the Dems as a whole, then there most certainly is an alliance. Blue media doesn't infantilize the news, and make s___ up like Fox does, but it favors the Dems overwhelmingly.
Idiot Democrat media don't make shit up? You have gotta be kidding me, Soros-bot.
DeleteAll they do is spewing TDS, day and night 24X7, and all that is nothing but lies. If you don't see, Soros-bot, you've been lobotomized.
I think the mainstream media favors Dems only in the sense that it does not repeat right wing propaganda as often as Fox, otherwise it is centrist. We who are left of center consider Bernie and AOC as the left, not an extremist fringe.
DeleteI consider Biden to be a Democratic, left wing president. Look at the way the NY Times and the Washington Post pushed the "Biden is too old" campaign by uncritically reprinting right wing propaganda. In that case, the media were certainly not left at all. And they are never left during recent presidential campaigns -- their coverage was overwhelmingly tilted in favor of Trump and against Hillary, Biden and Kamala, repeating a constant "Democrats in disarray" theme. Look at the self-hate reflected by the media now as supposed Democrats call ourselves unlikeable bad campaigners, except there are lots of Dems who don't feel that way about our party, especially the ones resisting Trump. If the media were truly left, it would be trying to unite the party and not repeating the worst complaints against us, voiced by people who are not us and not our friends. Those voices are the same ones Somerby quotes often here as he echoes the Democrats do everything wrong meme. Actual Democratic leaders are trying to hearten and unite the left to oppose Trump. They are standing behind Newsom not wondering whether immigration is really a problem in LA. Somerby never quotes them, nor does the media.
Somerby might have documented the exodus of left voices from the mainstream media over the past 5 years, especially after Trump was elected. Why is Krugman no longer at the NY Times? If Somerby refuses to read any other media, then he will be left with no one to quote except David Brooks, who he quotes more often than anyone except his favorites (Dylan, Sandburg, Knox on Homer, Wittgenstein, Frost).
It is said that Dems have a reality bias. If you report real news, you cannot help but favor Dems because we are the party that lives in reality instead of made up misinformation from the right. For example, how does a paper report on jobs accurately without "favoring" the Dems, when the facts are recognized by Dems but not the right? Is that a political bias or a factual bias. And that applies to so many newsworthy topics.
People on the right recognize that the mainstream media is not theirs because it isn't Fox, but that doesn't make it left wing or Democrat-favoring. Knocking the left in order to appear non-biased while going easy on Trump's obvious flaws (out of greed and fear) is not a Democratic/leftist bias.
Delete3:42,
DeleteSqueal louder, snowflake.
Someone in Texas can't hear your whining.
From Philip Bump via Steve M. (No More Mister Nice Blog):
ReplyDelete"Democrats are reducing crime, and we're doing it without militarizing cities, by deploying police officers and other resources to the right areas at the right times -- oh, and by the way, we're doing it with cops and others who aren't afraid to show their faces. Putting troops and a Humvee in front of a famous tourist site makes a pretty picture, but if that's not where the crime is, then it's pointless. Trump isn't fighting crime -- he's making reality television. He's more interested in visuals than safety. He;'s more interested in acting tough than being effective. And the Republican governors who are working with him really ought to be looking at their own states if they want to reduce crime."
People are in the streets protesting the presence of military troops in their city. Do you think that reduces or increases crime? Perhaps it depends on how you feel about freedom of speech.
ReplyDeleteHere is how Ad Fontes rates various media sources for bias:
ReplyDeleteHyper-Partisan Left: Pod Save America, Wonkette, the Hartmann Report, Don Lemon
Strong Left: All In (Chris Hayes), Rachel Maddow, Rolling Stone, Daily Kos, MSNBC Web
Skews Left: New Yorker, Huff Post, Wash Post, Daily Beast, PBS News Hour, Ezra Klein
Middle: Pew Research Center, AP, CBS, The Hill, Fortune, CNN, MSN, Cuomo
Skews Right: WSJ IBD, Reason, Keeping it Real, Fox News, New York Post, Epoch Times, the Reload
Hyper-Partisan Right: Fox & Friends, Infowars, Ben, Jesse Watters, The Ingraham Angle
Considered Hyper-Partisan Right and Low on Factuality: Charlie Kirk, Mark Levin, Loomer Unleashed
Strong Right: Rasmussen, Hot Air, Spectator, Matt Taibi,
Thank you, @4:34 . U agree with a lot of those judgements, but I disagree with the following.
Delete1. I'd call the New Yorker and PBD strong right. EVery Friday PBS has a "balanced" pair to discuss the news, but both of them are strong anti-Trumpers.
2. The ones he calls "middle", I'd call "skews left"
3. The WSJ opinion page is strong right. Their news pages are middle.
4. I agree that Charlie Kirk and Mark Levin are hyper-partisan right, but I have not found many errors in their work.
5. Matt Taibi is middle. Much of what he writes is in opposition to liberal narratives only because there are so many inaccuracies in the liberal narratives.
You can go to the Ad Fontes webpage and read their methods for determining their rankings. They are empirical, not a matter of individual opinions.
Deletehttps://app.adfontesmedia.com/chart/interactive
It is the essence of bias when someone is confronted by empirical evidence (facts) and yet refuses to change his beliefs. You can produce your own David in Cal Media Bias Chart, but you need a better justification than, this is what I think.
Thanks @4:56. I went to https://adfontesmedia.com/media-bias-chart-jan-2024/
DeleteI did not see the ranking method described. Is there somewhere lese that I should be looking?
https://adfontesmedia.com/methodology/
DeleteI am a Democrat and I agree with Rude Pundit's opinions about how we Democrats should be handling the Epstein situation:
ReplyDelete"The fact that Democrats don't constantly highlight that Trump is a rapist is political and moral malpractice. It was barely mentioned in the 2024 election, and it should have been the beginning of any conversation about Trump. Now, Democrats should react to any interaction with Trump in the way any non-rapist would react to being in the same room with a known rapist. They should treat Republican members of Congress like you would treat someone who is covering up for a rapist. If you say that norms or traditions don't allow you to act that way, then you have no understanding that a norm only works if everyone involved is adhering to it. Otherwise, you're just a sucker. And whatever bullshit social contract made Democrats the standard bearers of eternal comity, that shit was broken when Republicans made a rapist their leader and got him elected president again.
One of the things that has bugged the hell out of me around the whole Epstein files affair/scandal/cover-up is that too few people are behaving like what's at stake here is whether or not the rapist president committed more rapes, whether he raped children, and whether he provided aid and comfort to the scuzzy fuck who procured the girls for Trump and others to rape. At the very least, it's worth knowing if Trump was aware of the awful shit that Jeffrey Epstein was doing and didn't tell anyone. Trump said that they had a falling out over some cheap property they were each trying to buy in Palm Beach, FL, in 2004 and never spoke again. We know that Epstein was being a fucking monster during the time that he and Trump were friends. We know that Epstein committed multiple rapes in his Florida mansion and that Trump knew about Epstein's fondness for women "on the younger side." But, like I said, that's a rabbit hole you can go down. I wanna talk the politics of this moment.
Republicans have taken the position that Trump didn't rape Carroll, didn't rape or assault any of the women who have accused him, and didn't rape girls provided by Epstein. That is, frankly, an objectively repulsive position, especially because, again, a judge and jury declared Trump a rapist in the civil suit and, just last month, a federal appeals court upheld the verdict. The GOP has decided that its everyone else's problem and we all just have to deal with it when it comes to there being a rapist leading us.
To a large extent, until recently, Democrats have simply accepted that framing and, as usual, let the GOP dictate the rhetorical parameters and the terms of doing business in DC. The Epstein files fuck-up by Trump gives Democrats a chance to reframe things and present them in the way they should have been presented all along: the president is a rapist who might have committed more rapes, including the rapes of children. If you don't want all the facts to come out about it, then you are covering up for a rapist. And what the fuck is wrong with you if you do that, Mike Johnson? What the fuck are you so worried about? Hammer them constantly about their complicity with a rapist. The Democrats' revulsion should be visceral, visible, and intense. Let voters know that, at long last, there is some shit you will not eat. Trump's closeness to Epstein is their problem and they have to figure out how to deal with it. Some Democrats are getting on board with this strategy, but they need to go harder. On an interview show, you can say when asked about anything, "Well, the president is a rapist, and we always need to start with that."
Cont.
Delete"To any Democrats who think that this is somehow not the issue that voters care about, that voters want "kitchen table" issues discussed going into the midterms, that it's a distraction, as former Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi stupidly said last week, I'd say give me a fucking break. This is a righteous, necessary battle. There are real people, victims, here, women whose lives were fucked up by the actions of these rapists, including the rapist president. It's as fucking kitchen table as it gets in that it's the kind of thing that people actually talk about around the kitchen table. You shout out to Americans that the vile Attorney General had 1000 FBI agents scouring the Epstein files for any mention of Trump and that shit will go viral because what the fucking fuck. (Odious blow-up doll Pam Bondi is scrambling, and it's kind of delicious.)
And anyone who says that Democrats don't want the Epstein stuff out there because it might implicate Democrats like Bill Clinton doesn't fucking understand Democrats. We have no problem tossing someone to the wolves. Ask Anthony Weiner. Ask Andrew Cuomo. Ask Al Franken. We're ruthless when it comes to wrongdoing being revealed. You mean if we sacrifice Bill Clinton, we might get rid of Trump? Fuck, yeah, that's a fair trade.
The corporate media is already declaring that Trump has surfed his way through this wave of scandal and come out dry on the other side again. But it sure doesn't seem that way, with Tucker Carlson breaking with Trump, with MAGA drones at each other's throats (and some saying others have "Epstein Derangement Syndrome," which, yeah, get a new fucking phrase, assholes), with Bondi wanting to question imprisoned Epstein associate Ghislaine Maxwell, maybe even offering a pardon if she can bail Trump out by saying he was never involved. And Trump himself is throwing every fucking piece of red meat to the slavering MAGA hordes to try to get them off his scene. The latest is arresting Barack Obama for completely made-up bullshit about how Russia helped Trump win in 2016.
In the end, like at the start, Trump is a rapist. Everything flows from there. I think that the best case scenario is that Trump’s a rapist who covered up for other rapists. The worst case scenario is horrific. Democrats should be acting like it's the worst case and what they do and say should reflect the disgust and outrage they should have. "
My opinion:
DeleteWith this in mind, I do not understand why Somerby himself, supposed old lefty, has said nothing about his own outrage over Epstein's behavior and the actions of politicians to conceal what he did, while our current president behaves as if he were a normal human being and not a rapist (of women and perhaps of young girls too).
Somerby has always sided with accused men when it comes to sexual misbehavior, even in the Iliad. We Democrats have been too soft on Trump over his crimes and this one is too heinous to tolerate in a man who should be beyond reproach.
Why are we Democrats not reminding the American people that our leader is a criminal rapist who should not have been elected? Why is Trump being allowed to pretend that he belongs among good decent people and not in prison?
Putting the military in Washington DC to fight crime is too much, coming from a rapist president who claims he wants to reduce crime. Trump should be laughed out of Washington DC. His own past misbehavior means he has no standing to govern from without sounding ridiculous. That may be why he keeps pardoning criminals -- to make his own crimes seem more forgivable when they are not.
I want to see the Epstein Files released without redactions so that Trump's contribution to Epstein's crimes can be revealed for all to see. I want Trump to be impeached and removed from office on the basis that we cannot tolerate such a man as our President. These are indeed high crimes. The victims deserve no less, whether children or no longer with us because they could not stand the aftermath of what was done to them. Trump does not deserve to walk around a golf course every weekend (at taxpayer expense) after doing what he did to women and girls, in collusion with Epstein if not himself committing the rapes.
And I agree with Rude Pundit that any other men who participated should be held to account as well, even if they are Bill Clinton or another similarly revered Democrat, Republican, scientist or philanthropist. You don't get to walk around like a normal human being, pretending to be good and decent, after harming women and child that way.
Somerby should take a stand on this. If he protects filth, he should say so. If he doesn't care about women and girls, he should say so. The alternative, craven silence, is leaving others to think the worst about him. The time has come to stop being complicit with rapists, especially ones like Trump who have so many serious failings, too many to tolerate in a president.
Somerby is taking a stand, but if you mention his stand, his fanboys cry.
DeleteTry quoting his stand rather than inventing it.
Delete"The alternative, craven silence, is leaving others to think the worst about him."
DeleteNot all others. Only those inclined to convict a man based on his silence.
The "Epstein files -no one here has read them, but that doesn't stop them from spouting all sorts of evidence free allegations about what's in them, to the extent they exist (grand jury transcripts? prosecutors' files? I suppose that's what they are.) Calling someone a "child rapist' is the lowest form of slimy mud that can be thrown when the charge is made without solid evidence - as is the case here. The MAGAs' kind of walked into this - by promising to release te files and not doing so. Of all the misdeeds of Trump, his failure to release these files is the one thing that pulls their chain. Not to say that it's not possible there is embarrassing stuff in these "files" about Trump and others. and it's a valid point - what is the reason for their non-release? is there a cover up. But suspicion isn't proof. Do you think their release will lead to Trump's downfall? Nice to dream, but don't hold your breath.
DeleteNo. The bigots will fall in line, because they have no one who feeds it to them 24/7, like the self-admitted sexual predator.
DeleteAC/ MA, the Republican Party is up to their ears in sex pests, and their leader has been credibly accused of sexual predation on more than a few occasions.
Try to connect the dots.
I'm actually surprised you didn't chide the Democratic Party and call focusing on child sexual abuse victims "identity politics".
There was evidence that convicted Epstein and Maxwell. Stop pretending there isn’t. Depositions refer to Trump. But Trump has already been convicted in the Carroll case. He is not an innocent man. Referring to “embarrassing stuff” when there may be “criminal stuff” makes your own assumptions that seem likely to be unwarranted given Trump’s previous misbehavior with women. Lack of suspicion is not evidence of innocence.
Delete"There was evidence that convicted Epstein and Maxwell. Stop pretending there isn’t."
DeleteTruly dumb. Who does this respond to? No one in this thread.
AC/MA who keeps talking about innocence and lack of evidence.
DeleteCalling someone a rapist implies that they have been convicted for rape. And Trump has not been convicted for rape. Whoever this rude pundit is, they are among the dumbest political commentators in modern history.
DeleteThat sounds lie weasel words. The verdict was not rape because it was a defamation trial (where Trump was found to be guilty of defamation for calling Carroll a liar over her rape claims). The judge adjucated Trump a rapist as the basis for determining that Carroll did not lie about him raping her. The trial was about defamation because the statute of limitation for criminal charges of rape against Trump had expired. That it was too late to charge him with rape does not mean he was innocent, as the judge clearly stated.
DeleteCalling someone a rapist states explicitly that they committed rape. It has nothing to do with being convicted. It has to do with the sexual assault that Trump committed against Carroll.
Your logic suggests that if someone was never brought to justice, it is as if they never did the rape. It doesn't work that way. A rape is a rape whether the person is convicted or not. Lack of conviction means the person wasn't brought to justice and held accountable for their crime.
typo: adjudicated
DeleteNo one is calling Republicans adults.
DeleteDemocrats are on track to lose 10 seats in 2030 bc voters are fleeing blue states.
ReplyDeleteCA, the biggest blue state with the most exiting is now 51% leaving to 49% coming in. That suggests less of a gain than you are predicting, especially 5 years from now.
DeleteAnd then an odd bass note was heard coming from my fanny. It registered as D2 sharp on the musical scale, and sounded much like a tuba.
ReplyDelete- Fanny Horn