HEALING: Laura Ingraham didn't ask...

TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 23, 2025

...and Kelly doesn't care: "The sunshine of the prairie summer and fall months would come sifting down with healing and strength..."

As we noted yesterday—as we've noted in the past—Sandburg offered that mysterious claim near the end of his two-volume biography, Abraham Lincoln: The Prairie Years (1926).

Lincoln would soon be on his way from Illinois to the White House. He left "not knowing when, or whether ever, I may return, with a task before me greater than that which rested upon Washington." 

So the rail-splitter told the crowd at the Springfield railway station—the congregation to whom he would bid "an affectionate farewell." 

In fact, the healing of the American nation didn't come easily after he himself was shot and killed in April 1865. In truth, it isn't entirely clear that the healing ever took place at all.

That war had been fought between the Blue and the Grey. Today, we're involved in a great if undeclared civil war between the Red and the Blue. 

Could some sort of political genius accomplish some sort of healing now? Consider what happened just last night on a Fox News Channel program.

We refer to The Ingraham Angle, that channel's 7 p.m. show (that's 4 p.m. out on the coast). Midway through the program, Laura Ingraham spoke with Tom Homan. This was part of the background:

Trump Justice Dept. Closed Investigation Into Tom Homan for Accepting Bag of Cash

Tom Homan, who was later named President Trump’s border czar, was recorded in September 2024 accepting a bag with $50,000 in cash in an undercover F.B.I. investigation, according to people familiar with the case, which was later shut down by Trump administration officials.

The cash payment, which was made inside a bag from the food chain Cava, grew out of a long-running counterintelligence investigation that had not been targeting Mr. Homan, according to the people, who spoke on condition of anonymity to describe the case.

Mr. Homan’s encounter with the undercover agents, recorded on audiotape, led him to be investigated for potential bribery and other crimes, after he apparently took the money and agreed to help the agents—who were posing as businessmen—secure future government contracts related to border security, the people said.

After Mr. Trump took office this year, Justice Department officials shut down the case because of doubts about whether prosecutors could prove to a jury that Mr. Homan had agreed to do any specific acts in exchange for the money, and because he had not held an official government position at the time of the meeting with undercover agents, the people added.

That was the start of the front-page report in Sunday's New York Times. One day earlier, MSNBC's Leonnig and Dilanian had first reported these allegations. To see their report, click here.

Say what? Today, Homan is a major player within the Trump administration. When he allegedly accepted that bag of cash, last year's campaign between Candidates Trump and Harris was still going on.

Their lone debate had taken place on September 10. Two weeks later, had Homan accepted a big sack of cash? Last night, it almost seemed that Laura Ingraham wanted to find out. 

Her interview with Homan started at 7:22 p.m. Three minutes later, she asked:

INGRAHAM (9/22/25): Tom, I want to give you a chance to address this article that came out over the weekend. It was on our always reliable MSNBC and they said that you took $50,000 in cash in a bag from an undercover FBI agent to help them win government contracts in Trump’s second term.

The DOJ said they concluded there was no criminal wrongdoing. But nevertheless, that story is out there and I imagine you want to respond to that.

For the record, it was the DOJ under President Trump which apparently "concluded there was no criminal wrongdoing" with respect to that bag of cash. Still, had Homan accepted that big sack of cash? And if he had accepted the cash, why would he have done that?

Ingraham had asked about the report. In this, his first response, Tom Homan described. or perhaps failed to describe, what he, Tom Homan, had done:

HOMAN (continuing directly): Absolutely. I did nothing criminal. I did nothing illegal. And you know, it’s hit piece after hit piece after hit piece. And I’m glad the FBI and DOJ came out and said, you know, said that nothing illegal happened, nothing—you know, no criminal activity.

You’re talking about a guy who spent 34 years enforcing law. I mean, I left a very successful business that I ran to come back and work for a government again. I’m back on a government paycheck. Not only did I sacrifice, my family sacrifices. I make sacrifices every day. I got more death threats than anybody. 

INGRAHAM: I know that.

HOMAN: I got a security team around me, but guess what? My kids don’t, my wife don’t. I mean, I haven’t lived with my wife in months because I don’t want her to be here right now with all the threats.

So after all the sacrifices, after serving my nation for all these years, they want to come out and dirty me up. And it’s not going to end. There’s a hit piece on me every two weeks. But keep coming, because you know what? Tom Homan isn’t going anywhere, Tom Homan isn’t shutting up, and Tom Homan’s gonna keep doing what he’s doing because working with President Trump is the greatest honor of my life. We’re making this country safer again every day and we’re gonna keep doing it.

So said Tom Homan, just last night, speaking about Tom Homan. "Tom Homan’s gonna keep doing what he’s doing, "Tom Homan assertively said.

Tom Homan also said that Tom Homan had done nothing illegal. According to various legal specialists, that statement may (or may not) be accurate.

That said, had Tom Homan actually accepted that big bag of cash? As you can see, Tom Homan hadn't said whether Tom Homan had actually done that!

Tom Homan hadn't said if Tom Homan accepted the cash! For that reason, Ingraham advanced this probing follow-up question:

INGRAHAM (continuing directly):  Thank you for joining us.

Thank you for joining us, she said! At that point, she teased the next topic, then went to a commercial break.

For whatever reason, Ingraham had waited until the end of the short interview segment before she asked about this topic. After Homan's rambling statement, she thanked him and went to a break.

Was that a serious attempt at journalism, or was that merely a set-up—a set-up engineered by the pro-Trump Fox News Channel? You can judge that one for yourself—but an earlier statement by Megyn Kelly seemed to illustrate the very deep hole we're all in at this point.

It's a very deep tribal hole—the kind of hole a nation is in when a functioning nation (or empire) has essentially broken apart. 

At this point, Kelly is a high-profile, somewhat flamboyant pro-Trump podcaster. There's no law against such a stance, but her initial reaction to the report about Homan and the cash had perhaps been a bit surprising.

She spoke on behalf of Red America. We DO NOT CARE, the podcaster wrote. 

Here's Mediaite's report:

Megyn Kelly Defends Declaring ‘We DO NOT CARE’ About Tom Homan Corruption Allegations

Former Fox News host turned successful podcaster Megyn Kelly declared over the weekend that she absolutely does not care about the allegation that Trump border czar Tom Homan was recorded accepting $50,000 to help with securing government contracts.

[...]

Carol Leonnig, who broke the story, posted the report to X over the weekend. Kelly quickly replied to Leonnig’s post and wrote, “We DO NOT CARE. Don’t bother @RealTomHoman he’s a national treasure.”

Lay off Homan, the podcaster said. We don't care whether he took that cash!

Later, Kelly provided a lengthy explanation of that initial post. In the course of that post, she offered a rather startling statement.

We'll start with that angry post tomorrow—but a former nation has come apart when a major segment of its population has reached the point Kelly described in that second post.

Question:

Should we bid this struggling nation an affectionate farewell? Laura Ingraham didn't ask—and Kelly doesn't care!

Tomorrow: According to Kelly, this is all her emerging tribe really wants to do


70 comments:

  1. Karoline Leavitt says Homan never took the $50,000.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Karoline Leavitt is scrupulously honest, is that what you’re saying?

      Delete
    2. Leavitt? Here's one person I never want to testify on my behalf or attest to my innocence. Pretty much seals Homan's guilt.

      Delete
    3. Is it wrong for my gaze to slip onto Leavitt's massive cleavage when I am praying to her big ass cross?

      Delete
  2. I would like to know why they set up a sting operation on Homan at that point in time.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. No, you really wouldn't like to know, you fascist freak.

      Delete
    2. David could perhaps read the reporting about it, except he won’t.

      Delete
    3. Keep embarrassing yourself. It is a good look.

      Delete
    4. I am so old I remember when my annual ethics class at half a dozen companies said when consulting at a government property, don't even but them lunch. The fucking horrid USSC now says Government employees should call unethical bribes a fucking gift, and it is all good. So much winning in Nazi America, eh' DiChead?

      Delete
    5. but = buy fumble fingers

      Delete
    6. The FBI was not investigating Homan when they stumbled on his outstretched hand.

      Delete

  3. So what activities was Homan doing that made the FBI decided to send undercover agents to try and entrap him into doing something illegal by giving him $50K in cash?

    Most likely this was another attempt by the Deep State to create another "investigation" that would be leaked to the media to keep Trump from picking Homan due to the "appearance of impropriety."

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yeah, most likely. That explains everything, dunnit? Because Trump and his cronies are so squeaky clean…

      Delete
    2. I'm still not afraid of the Deep State. Anyone could have pushed President 400 lb. Weakling Around, to keep him from releasing the Epstein Files.
      I'd like to see them try that on someone with a backbone.

      Delete
    3. Isn't it kinda funny that when the Government owned by billionaires is filled with a bunch of slimy MoFo's who know for certain there will be zero accountability for anything they do; you dumb mofos think the deep state is now working for you. Talk about fucking rubes.

      Delete
    4. The FBI investigation initially did not concern Homan, but organically led to him. I guess they could've stumbled on anyone in Trump's gang.

      Delete
  4. Why doesn’t Homan just come out and deny that he took the $50,000?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Because his boss takes bags of cash and looks down on people who don't take bags of cash.

      Bags-of-cash-taking in this administration earns you a promotion.

      Homan's best career move here would be to deny the bags of cash he took only contained $50k. He should say there was a much higher amount in those bags of cash.


      Delete
    2. Damn, Hector, you stole my comment! Exactly right, when one works for Trump, one has to act as Trump would. To quote Trump: when I see money, I start grabbing.

      Delete
    3. Sorry to say fake news from normally reliable Hector & Ilya. Homan is in big trouble with the Admin for being a punk who only accepted $50,000. Trump cronies should never sell out for less than $1,000,000.

      Delete
    4. Trump cronies should never sell out for less than $1,000,000.
      Well, that was before tariffs and Trumpflation.

      Delete
    5. Apologize Ilya, hadn't factored that.

      Delete
  5. I think Homan was wise to not deny the story. It would have added to the smear. It would have allowed the media to run another smearing article
    TOM HOMAN DENIES TAKING BRIBE

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. How would “Tom Holman denies taking bribe” be a smear if he had denied taking a bribe?

      Delete
    2. Don't interrupt Dickhead in Cal turning Homan into a victim, he's on a roll here now.

      Delete
    3. OK. Tom Homan should not have denied that he took a bribe because the media would have reported that he denied taking a bribe. If the media collaboratively reassured Tom Homan that they would not report on his statements to the media, would he have your permission to make the denial? You are a ludicrous clown on this subject.

      Delete
    4. Being of Jewish heritage David for sure knows what a smear is on his bagel.

      Delete
    5. D & C - how do you know it's a "smear?" What if he took the $50,000, but according to him, it was completely legal. Your position is he shouldn't tell the truth?

      Delete
  6. NEXSTAR joins Sinclair in pulling Jimmy Kimmel off air tonight after his lies about Charlie Kirk’s assassination.
    This move will keep Jimmy Kimmel’s lies out of +100 million American households.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Repeating the words of Charlie Kirk is a bigger crime than raping a 5-year old, if you're a Right-winger.

      Delete
    2. Charlie Kirk didn't believe anything he said.

      Delete
    3. Charlie Kirk thought he could bath mouth trans people, and not get shot in the neck for his troubles. Does that make him a very special American, or just another dime a dozen ignorant bigot on the Right?

      Delete
    4. Here lies Charlie Kirk. A RINO who was unable to shutdown any Left-wing arguments, destroy any liberals in debates, nor trigger any Leftists who think Antifa isn't a terrorist organization.
      Why is the Right honoring this mealy-mouthed pushover again?

      Delete
    5. MAGA media immediately engaged in a dishonest narrative about the killer being left wing, and the left wing being the killer. Kimmel called them out on it. Did he hurt your feelings?

      Delete
    6. We will continue to crush the "trans" movement until it is nonexistent, and it made a tactical error in creating a martyr. By the time we're done, and it will be quick, "identifying as trans" will be synonymous with admitting you are a violent, mentally ill, dangerous outcast who must be institutionalized. No one will aspire to the sick perverted lifestyle. Back under the rock you perverts go.

      Delete
    7. 11;49,
      About that 2nd Amendment...

      Delete
    8. The people who ran to the fainting couch over a late-night comedian's jokes, is going to crush trans people.

      Do these snowflakes ever listen to themselves?

      Delete
    9. Being an old I don't fully get trans. But my daughter's very good friend transitioned. After not seeing her friend since H.S. I met him and his family when my daughter was in town. He had planned the transition well. His wife and kid make a wonderful family. 11:49, you are the sick one. Go read up on what Jesus said and get out of the gutter of hate filled nonsense.

      Delete
    10. 40% of "trans" attempt or complete suicide. Let's make more of them.

      Delete
    11. 11:57 Males are moving hard right and arming more substantially than ever. Most leftist men are afraid of weapons or not allowed to have them by their feminist mothers or in rare cases girlfriends or wives. Don't think the 2A is any kind of threat.

      Delete
    12. Or are Christians who take "though shall not kill" seriously, unlike chickenshit haters.

      Delete
    13. Democrat "men" have boyfriends, not girlfriends or wives.

      Delete
    14. Please explain what lies Jimmy Kimmel told about the horrible assassination of the creepy hater Kirk?

      Delete
    15. Fallon I think is his last name.

      Delete
    16. There is a small percentage of Christian or Christian spirited lefties who aren't murderous psychopaths who worship destruction and death, but it's so small it's just statistical noise.

      Delete
  7. He's innocent but wish he'd been entrapped so we could get the Post headline. HE'S ONLY HOMAN

    ReplyDelete
  8. YouTube admits the Biden administration pressured them to censor Americans, offers terminated channels opportunity to rejoin the platform.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Let the Nazi haters loose you bitches!!! Let's get more people shot by promoting hate speech!!! So much winning!!!

      Delete
  9. A couple of questions pop to mind:
    1. Has Homan returned the money?
    2. If Homan hasn't returned the money, has he paid taxes on the "gift"?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. 3. Is Homan legally required to return the money?

      Delete
    2. Look how far the morals of Dave the actuary have fallen. Just another corrupt asshole after ten years of the Orange Dump. Sweet goodness David, take a deep look in the mirror and see what you have become. Another dime a dozen corrupt asshole, and Nazi, btw.

      Delete
    3. If DOGE was doing their job Homan would have to return the Government's money. What happened to eliminating waste, fraud, and abuse you two faced moron?

      Delete
    4. The FBI gave him a gift? It should be documented and he needs to declare it on his taxes. Does the FBI normally gift people 50K in Cava bags?
      The above questions not withstanding, what sort of nihilistic, or judgement free, position are you staking out, David?

      Delete

  10. "Lay off Homan, the podcaster said. We don't care whether he took that cash!"

    Whoa, how shocking. Bad, bad podcaster. But compare it to this one:
    ""Hunter Biden literally could have had the corpses of children in his basement, I would not have cared," Harris told Trigger Pod hosts Konstantin Kisin and Francis Foster in a video clip that has been viewed online over 2.1 million times on Twitter."

    https://www.newsweek.com/who-sam-harris-writer-hunter-biden-laptop-1734981

    Somehow, you and your idiot-Democrat comrades neglected to pay any attention to that one, eh? Not to mention being shocked and outraged. Why's that, Bob?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I doubt about the quote. However, Hunter didn't, and Homan did -- and is working for the cartel...I mean the administration.

      Delete
    2. Your own clip shows Harris' point was merely rhetorical because his right-wing interviewer later said, in the same clip, "Fuck the kids in the basement " as his right-wing sidekick laughed.

      Delete
    3. Sorry 12:01, MAGA don't do context when promoting their bullshit.

      Delete
    4. What does this have to do with the current President raping children?

      Delete
    5. Eat a bag of dicks Mao.

      Delete
  11. Back in the day, Trump handed Bondi 50K -- don't know if it was in a Cava bag -- so that she shuts down the case against Trump University.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Per the Roberts Court it's totally legal if it doesn't say "This package contains a bribe." on it. And correct spelling counts.

      Delete
    2. Recall Bondi was an even cheaper date than Homan, Trump bought her for a lousy $25,000.

      Delete
    3. I couldn't remember if it was 25K or 50K that Trump had paid to Bondi to drop the investigation into Trump U. I thought I posted this below, but I guess I didn't.

      Delete
  12. My wife is pregnant and will join other pregnant women posting videos on social media of them downing Tylenol to stick it to Trump.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The same people taking Tylenol specifically because Trump said not to are also on their 7th booster of his big beautiful rushed vaccine.

      Delete
  13. Somewhere, within the deep state, there's documentation of the 50K that the FBI had released to pay Homan.
    During his performative chest-beating Homan alludes to the sacrifices he had to make to take his ever-so-important job to abuse and terrorize people. Essentially, he seems to be saying that he's entitled to this money.

    PS: Is it just a coincidence that ICE agents are given 50K in signing bonuses? Does it come in a Cava bag?

    ReplyDelete
  14. holy sh*t!
    Would-Be Kavanaugh Assassin Planned to Murder As Many as 4 SCOTUS Justices to Protect Roe v. Wade
    n the spring of 2022, the defendant meticulously researched, planned, and attempted to assassinate at least one — but had a stated target of three — sitting judges of the United States Supreme Court. The defendant’s explicit objective was to single-handedly alter the Constitutional order for ideological ends. . . . The defendant’s own words show that the defendant was “shooting for 3” assassinations. . .

    ReplyDelete