SATURDAY, SEPTEMBER 20, 2025
Fox & Friends Weekend holds forth: We'll start today with something puzzling—with an apparent look at the puzzling way Blue America's elites sometimes work.
The snapshot comes from Maureen Dowd's new column. Headline included, her column starts like this:
The Way They Were
In 1986, my most prized possession was a little pink phone message slip written by a hotel clerk.
“Miss Dowd,” it read, “Robert Redford called. He’s at the same number as last night.”
I’d never met Redford, but that piece of paper was a magic portal to all kinds of pink-cloud fantasies. I stuck it up on my cubicle in the Washington bureau of The Times and gazed at it whenever I needed a lift.
Then, one night, the bureau chief went on a crazed cleaning campaign and sent a crew in to throw out every stray piece of paper around our desks.
I came in the next morning and my beloved message was gone.
The column continues from there. But can that possibly be the way Blue America's most important newspaper works?
Really? One night, out of the blue, a bureau chief ordered a cleaning crew to go through the cubicles of the paper's Waashington staff? The crew had been ordered to "throw out every stray piece of paper around [their] desks?"
That's what Dowd reports. She herself lost a note she treasured as a keepsake. But what else could have ben thrown away—what important telephone number of what elusive source—if some such cleaning campaign was really sent through that office?
Is that the way our Blue elites work? Is that the size and the shape of their basic intelligence?
We don't have the slightest idea! But if you've watched this cadre for the past forty years, you'd have to say that it's possible.
"Man [sic] is the rational animal," Aristotle is said to have said. Over here in Blue America, we remarkably self-impressed Blues have tended to rework that claim:
"We Blues are the rational and moral animal," we Blues have long messaged and thought. The others—the ones over there—are the dumb and immoral ones. That's the picture we Blues have conveyed.
In fact, our Blue elites aren't actual giants. And in our view, at the present time, the Red elites are even worse!
(We're speaking here about "journalists," academics and office holders. We're not speaking about the tens of millions of regular people who show up to vote for the Reds, or perhaps for the Blues, in our election years.)
As it suddenly happens, we may be away from our sprawling campus today, but we want to give you a minor hint of what we just saw.
Before we do, we offer this query:
Does anyone really think that those of us in Blue America haven't already earned our way out? As the Achaeans keep coming over the walls, does anyone think, for even a minute, that we Blues are going to find a way to roll back this assault and prevail?
We're speaking about a segment we just watched on this morning's Fox & Friends Weekend program. The segment was teased at 7:21. A few minutes later, the deluge.
The segment involved what Rep. Mikie Sherrill (D-NJ) said yesterday about the late Charlie Kirk. More specifically, it involved (some of) what Sherrill said about Kirk "after the passage of a House resolution honoring the conservative activist."
Sherrill voted in favor of the resolution, then sought to explain her vote. Dual headline included, Fox News Digital offers this report about the basics of the matter:
Far-left Dem says Charlie Kirk wanted to 'roll back rights of women and Black people' after House tribute
Rep. Mikie Sherrill made the controversial statement after the House honored Kirk following his assassination
Rep. Mikie Sherrill, D-N.J., the far-left Democratic nominee for governor, called Charlie Kirk a Christian nationalist who wanted to roll back the rights of women and Black people after the passage of a House resolution honoring the conservative activist.
The House adopted a resolution to honor Kirk's "life and legacy" Friday, just over a week after he was shot and killed during a college campus speaking event in Utah. The measure got bipartisan support in a 310-58 vote, with both Democrats and Republicans condemning political violence after Kirk's assassination.
The vote divided Democrats, however, with 95 lawmakers, including Sherrill, voting to adopt the resolution, 58 voting against it and 22 not voting at all.
"I take my oath to the Constitution seriously. I believe in free speech and that the First Amendment wouldn’t be necessary if it were only meant to cover language we agreed with," Sherrill said in a statement. "It is meant to protect people like Charlie Kirk who present vile dissenting views. But it is also meant to protect teachers, doctors and TV comedians who may express views the president doesn’t like.
"Charlie Kirk was advocating for a Christian nationalist government and to roll back the rights of women and Black people. This flies in the face of every value I hold dear and that I fight for," she added. "But the Constitution protects free speech, even for those I vehemently oppose."
For ourselves, we probably would have voted "Present." But that's part of what Sherrill said.
Sherrill is especially important today because she's the Democratic nominee in this year's gubernatorial election in New Jersey. She was savaged, in deeply instructive ways, during the Fox & Friends segment in question.
The three official co-host/friends brought Lara Trump onto the set to assist in the trashing of Sherrill. The insults were flowing freely all through the remarkable segment.
At present, Achaeans of this type are coming over the walls of our own sacred Troy. Blue America's journalists and office holders don't seem to know how to react.
Increasingly, the Democratic Party is being represented in the public square by Rep. Jasmine Crockett (D-Texas). She strikes us as a gift which won't stop giving for propagandists of the MAGA right.
Other members of the party seem to have no idea how to respond to the present Red American onslaught. That said, this morning's journalistic behavior by the three Fox friends, with Lara Trump thrown in, struck us as a study in ongoing societal downfall:
We start with the "editing" of the remarks made by the targeted "far left" player in question. (She's so "far left" that she voted in favor of the resolution!)
From there, we move to the creative paraphrase of what that target said and must surely have meant—but mainly to the aggressive name-calling which characterized the segment.
Fox viewers were given little chance to hear what Sherrill had said. No attempt was made to let viewers decide if there was some sort of rational basis for what she had said.
The name-calling took the place of such traditional journalistic niceties as the three friends, joined by the poisonous daughter-in-law, offered an array of insults about how "gross" and "insulting" Merrill's "lies" had been.
("The most disgusting thing I've ever seen!" So several of the spear-chuckers actually said.)
Even by the norms of this TV show, the propaganda seemed extreme. Did we mention the fact that Rep. Sherrill is running for governor this year?
Can a large modern nation survive the arrangements which have given birth to inanities of this type? To wit:
The Democratic Party (assisted by MSNBC) seems to be trying to align itself behind a self-defeating figure like Rep. Crockett. Meanwhile, Blue America's major journalists and major news orgs refuse to report or discuss what happens on the Fox News Channel—on this nation's most-watched "cable news" channel by far.
According to Dowd, she lost her note about Robert Redford when an unannounced cleaning crew rampaged through the office one night. Are Blue elites really that feckless?
Based upon the behaviors of the past forty years, you can bet your sweet bippy they are!
As for the rest of us in our struggling nation, how did we get from "the way we were" to the way we currently are?
Nothing to look at! Look over here, our Blue elites tend to say.
Will Putin get tired of all the winning? At this point, there's no sign of any let-up from the determined spear-chuckers at the Fox & Friends Weekend program.
(Later today, for two solid hours, The Big Weekend Show will likely be worse.)
They continue to work under cover of darkness. Over here in Blue America, our elites seem to like it that way!
The NY Times is not blue.
ReplyDeleteMaureen Dowd is not a journalist or reporter. She writes an op-ed column occasionally.
DeleteAnd she’s not blue.
DeleteDowd is not particularly blue. She is cynical and dismissive of everyone she mentions, in order to be snarky and crude and mainly cruel. She seems like an awful person, and has always been that way.
DeleteShe is not a Democrat. She is an equal opportunity nihilist. She earned a pulitzer tormenting Bill Clinton, referred to Al Gore as "practically lactating" because of his environmentalism, called John Edwards "the Breck Girl" because of his hair and supported Trump instead of Hillary, calling Hillary a hawk and Trump a dove (which we can all see is plainly untrue). She was one of the people trying to push Biden out of office. Her brother is a Trump enthusiast. So why does Somerby call her part of the Blue press when she isn't and hasn't been a supporter of Democrats?
I turn blue reading the stupid thoughts of elderly Dems on their blogs. Get with the times Daddio.
DeleteI'm not certain Somerby is a Dem.
DeleteNow earn more than $15k per month by working online. i have got my 4th paycheck of $19632 and i gave this job just 2 hours from my whole busy day. very easy work to do and regular income from this are much better than other regular 9 to 5 office job. no special skills required all you need to do is copy and paste things and earns without selling anything. go to this web now for info.
DeleteHERE -------->> Www.Paycash1.site
Let’s keep kicking people out of the blue tent and see how many elections we’ll win.
DeleteIf Somerby is not a Dem, it is very unlikely he would vote blue, given his writing here.
Delete
ReplyDelete""Charlie Kirk was advocating for a Christian nationalist government and to roll back the rights of women and Black people. This flies in the face of every value I hold dear and that I fight for," she added."
What an idiot asshole she is. But hey, of course: she's a Democrat. No surprise there.
I supported Charlie because I hope for a godly America and because I want an end to special privileges for perverts and race hustlers.
DeleteCharlie Kirk was the only Republican voter who wasn't a bigot.
DeleteSo a reliable republican shot him in the neck for being a RINO.
DeleteTriggered, Hillary?
DeleteKeep draining the swamp, Kash. Best way to do that is attend UFC fights on an FBI private jet. That sets an example for the rest of us.
DeleteMANKA! (Make America North Korea Again)
Eye see what you did there.
DeleteSomerby wonders whether a boss would order the cleaning crew to throw away scraps of paper in a newspaper office but he doesn't wonder whether Robert Redford would ever write and leave such a note for Dowd, with a hotel clerk.
ReplyDeleteDowd presents the situation coyly, as some sort of romantic liaison but it may simply have been that she was trying to reach him for legitimate reasons, such as to confirm a fact about him, and he was returning her calls. Gushing like a school girl over a movie star is stupid for Dowd to attempt at her age, now that Redford is deceased and cannot defend himself. Redford was single from 1985 to 2009, so there is scandal or infidelity involved, depending on when this supposedly happened. But I think Dowd made the whole story up, including all of the unbelievable parts, as a rhetorical device, a way to make her essay seem relevant.
Meanwhile, Somerby first casts doubt on her story, then accepts it and calls all blues dumb dumb dumb, because that is how Somerby rolls. And this is why I can't figure out who to dislike more, Dowd or Somerby.
If I were going to condemn a whole bunch of blue journalists, would I do not it based on this slim ridiculousness? It makes Somerby seems like as weird and slippery a character as anyone he is condemning on the blue journalistic bench. What is wrong with him?
"Dowd presents the situation coyly, as some sort of romantic liaison"
DeleteIf Dowd was trying to present the note as part of some sort of romantic liaison, why would she have described the note as a portal to "all kinds of pink-cloud fantasies."
The key word is fantasy, something not real but only imagined.
First read. Then comment.
"(Somerby) doesn't wonder whether Robert Redford would ever write and leave such a note for Dowd, with a hotel clerk."
DeleteNor should he. What's questionable about Dowd's anecdote is not the fact of the note, but the cleaning crew aspect of how it disappeared.
You know how those old Post It notes that get lint and lose their stick? No, it's bands of housekeepers grabbing important stuff off important journalists desks. Yeesh. As bad as Dowd is, Somerby bends over to be twice as bad. Attacking the few Dems willing to stand up to this fascist regime. What a hoser. The loud ones make us happy.
Delete@11:12, I would bet that Robert Redford got pretty tired of being sexualized by desperate spinsters like Dowd.
DeleteI think Robert Redford liked being sexualized.
DeleteOnly about 25% of his roles were romantic parts. He could have been like Rock Hudson but preferred more substantial parts, obviously (from the list of his films). In "The Way We Were," Streisand's character's life was the focus of the film and he was kind of a cad. Not exactly romantic given the complexities of their relationship. Given that he could choose his own roles after the success of Butch Cassidy & the Sundance Kid, he doesn't seem to have been inclined to sexualize himself.
DeleteOh. My. God. Barbara was like buttah in that movie. Redford is a stiff.
DeleteBarbara like buttah made Redford stiff by sexualizing him.
DeleteHe is a bad guy in the film. Many women don’t find that sexy.
Delete"They continue to work under cover of darkness. Over here in Blue America, our elites seem to like it that way!"
ReplyDeleteCleaning crews have always done that. It is to prevent interfering with the work activities of whatever business they are cleaning for. If Down wanted to keep her slip of magic paper, she should have had it framed. That's what real journalists do with their clandestine notes.
If Somerby were an immigrant woman with a family to feed, he would know how this stuff works. Instead, he thinks a silly story by Dowd, who has always been this silly or worse, means all of blue America is damned and Putin will win all the marbles, including ones Trump has lost.
So you believe Dowd’s story? So do I. Nothing about it is improbable.
DeleteI think Somerby and Dowd deserve each other. Neither has married over their long lifetimes, so perhaps this is a love letter from Somerby to Dowd, worth pinning on a corkboard beside one's typewriter.
DeleteRobert Redford, who is a staunch Democrat, would feel slimed by Dowd's use of his fame to make herself seem important. I feel sorry for Redford's family that his reputation should be sullied by even this small contact with Dowd, who is a ridiculous figure, when she isn't being pathetic.
ReplyDeleteWho exactly is working under cover of darkness, over here? Journalists have their work published for everyone to see, with their names attached. If he is referring to some dark blue conspiracy, he needs to be more explicit, otherwise he is just smearing the left and encouraging more right wing conspiracy theories against us.
ReplyDeleteSomerby should buy the NY Times and hire writers who agree with him.
ReplyDeleteCan a nation survive if its citizens are told corporations will leave the country if you raise corporate tax rates?
ReplyDeleteDowd is a heck of a writer. Even when she doesn’t have much to say, she makes her column compelling reading.
ReplyDeleteDowd is a boring joke. Figures you are a fan.
DeleteI think you misread David, he said Dowd is a hack of a writer.
DeleteDowd was a favorite and well-chosen target of Somerby’s back in the early days of his blog when she mocked Clinton and Gore. She isn’t a good writer.
DeleteThe white-washing of Charlie Kirk's words will continue until someone shoots the rest of the Right in their necks.
ReplyDelete"... the way Blue America's most important newspaper ..."
ReplyDeleteSomerby's drift into irrelevance continues apace.
Somerby is almost as lazy as Samuel Alito.
DeleteSamuel Alito is almost as lazy as Maureen Dowd.
DeleteMaureen Dowd is almost as lazy as Bob Somerby.
DeleteI’m lazier than any of them.
DeleteIt's always about you.
Delete"Charlie Kirk was advocating for a Christian nationalist government and to roll back the rights of women and Black people.”
ReplyDeleteThis is an example of the dishonest demonization that helped persuade an unbalanced person to murder Kirk.
Charlie Kirk wanted blacks and women running the country, but the Right killed him before he could see his dream come to fruition.
Delete"Liberals were correct all along."
DeleteCharlie Kirk
Come on now David, you be on team MAGA, own the hate you weak bitch.
DeleteThe usual goons on the local TV news last night bragging about getting teachers fired for dissing St. Charlie of Kirk, how this is no longer tolerated in this country, and that they are establishing Talking Point USA clubs in the High Schools. Even though they did not know who he was ten days ago. No counter viewpoint. Everything is fine. Herr Drumph!
DeleteKirk would be right there alongside Epstein if he were around then. Here are some quotes of Kirk on the topic of young women:
Delete“The biggest thing is this: more younger women need to get married at a younger age and start having kids. The single woman issue is one of the biggest issues facing a civilization...We have more single women in their early 30’s that are the most depressed, suicidal, anxious, and lonely in America’s history because there’s a biological clock that’s going off and they realize that they’re not going to be able to have kids, that they’re not as desirable in the dating market or in the dating pool and so they start to lash out on the rest of society by voting democrat.”
"Just get married early. Reject the siren song of modernity and have lots of kids. Being a partner at a local law firm actually isn’t that big of a deal. Having three kids is a really big deal and will make you happier and it’s okay to be a stay at home mom. In fact, we need a lot of stay at home moms and a lot of women want to be stay at home moms and we have miserable women because we’ve been shuffling them into a corporate wasteland. When in reality, a lot of them don’t find a lot of passion or fulfillment in that line of work. And who can blame them?”
These are not only quotes from his show, but the kind of justifications older men use for seducing underage teens. This is incel, bro culture nonsense used by pathetic younger men who cannot attract women because of their self-serving resentment toward having to respect them (which most women can sense). If women weren't less inclined toward violence than men, I might suspect a woman had assassinated him for his views that women don't want to be treated like fully functioning human beings.
Most families will not be able to afford stay at home moms given the current inflation and rising prices. If Kirk were serious about that, he wouldn't support Trump's economic policies. His main goal is to keep women out of public sphere so that they no longer compete with men, are dependent on men for their sustenance, have nowhere to go after an argument because divorce is impossible without money, and no longer can pursue higher ed (where they out-compete men) because their parents see them only as future housekeepers who don't need college. Kirk wants to go back to the bad old days when men controlled women and women had few options.
DeleteWomen see that and that is why they so greatly outnumber men in the Democratic party and are missing among Trump's followers. Women are way less foolish than MAGA men and they recognize what they are hearing from guys like Kirk.
“We made a huge mistake when we passed the Civil Rights Act in the 1960s.” — Charlie Kirk etc., etc. I do like that Mrs. St. Kirk, a PhD candidate, will now be working full time crisscrossing the country to maintain the family grift* of telling white women to drop out of college, skip your career and make babies. Second coming of two faced Phyllis Schaffley. *$92M/year from three billionaire families.
DeleteDavid, your complaint would carry some weight if you actually stood up for the principle of standing up to dishonest demonization. Instead, you proudly support it when the target is your political foe.
DeleteDiC, do you have any evidence that the shooter did anything but listen to Kirk’s actual words? How do you know he was listening to other people describe Kirk’s views?
DeleteAnd finally, DiC, if a person is truly “unbalanced”, then surely anything could cause him to commit violent acts, including an accurate description of the target’s views.
Delete"NBC News reports the federal investigation into the assassination of MAGA activist Charlie Kirk has yet to uncover a link between alleged shooter Tyler Robinson and the left-wing groups that President Donald Trump and his administration have pledged to prosecute.
Delete“Every indication so far is that this was one guy who did one really bad thing because he found Kirk’s ideology personally offensive,” an anonymous source familiar with the investigation told NBC."
"MAKENA KELLY: Yeah. So, the first bullet casing that they mentioned in that press conference said, “Hey fascist! Catch!” And then it had an up, and then a right, and then three downward arrows. At the beginning of this investigation, a lot of folks were saying that those three downward arrows were an anti-fascist symbol, but when you add those additional first two arrows, it’s actually just a code that you would input when playing a game called Helldivers 2, which is a satirical anti-fascist game where you’re playing as what you — what the characters believe to be anti-fascists, but you really are the fascists. So it’s just a game that folks play.
DeleteThe bomb that that code calls for is like this thing called an Eagle 500-kilogram bomb or something. And it’s a meme in the community of Helldivers, where it’s seen as — when you call that down, it is in a comically excessive bomb to drop. It will just basically — in the game, it’ll solve all of your problems, and you don’t have to think about anything else.
And so, instead of thinking — instead of looking at that bullet casing and saying, like, “Oh, this is a leftist ideology, right?” you could look at it coming from the community around the folks who play this game, be like, “Oh, I’m doing something perhaps comically excessive in assassinating this man,” fortunately, and trying to send that sign — right? — trying to make it a joke and a meme, something that we kind of saw him reference in the charging documents yesterday."
https://www.alternet.org/tyler-robinson-die-laughing/
Theorizing motives is a bullshit game. John Hinckley shot at Reagan to impress Jody Foster. It doesn't stop asshole Repukes though.
DeleteBill Maher said on his show:
Delete"At the Emmys, would it have killed someone to get up there — since they all want to talk about their politics — would it have kill somebody to get up there, not give a speech about how much they like Charlie Kirk, just to say, we had a political assassination this week, and that’s wrong, and we should — they would have been booed off the stage because he was on the wrong team, so you’re not even allowed to say that. Can you imagine if a left-wing person was assassinated that week, the whole show would have been about that."
The problem is that we have pretty clear information now that the shooter was not killing Kirk for his politics but because of his expressed hate toward someone the shooter loved. Kirk appears to have been shot for his social bigotry, by a kid who was largely apolitical if not right wing. The right wishes to consider tolerance for transpeople to be left wing, but gender views are non-partisan except when the right is trying to demonize people who are gender divergent.
In view of this, I don't believe anyone at the Emmys had a responsibility to make any statement about Kirk, except that killing is wrong. But that is so obvious that it goes without saying, so there isn't any clear reason for anyone presenting or accepting an award to say anything about Kirk.
In CO, it is tradition to make a statement thanking indigenous people for the use of their land, acknowledging that it was theirs first before its current use for public purposes. I am fine with that because it is true. I do not want to be compelled to make a public statement about Kirk, when he is someone who I consider to be evil. I am not glad he was shot, but I don't think he deserves any greater acknowledgement of his unfortunate death than any other person killed by gun violence in our society.
If they do put up any statues to Kirk's memory, I hope birds find them useful for sitting on, so that some good can come from his life.
While lawyers sometimes theorize motives, it isn't part of proving a crime. This difficulties in this situation may illustrate why. People often do various things without understanding their own motives enough to say why they did what they clearly did. But for observers, understanding why is important because we are all trying to prevent it happening again.
DeleteKirk was a Christian Nationalist. Check.
DeleteKirk called MLK an awful person and the Equal Rights Act a terrible mistake. If a terrible mistake has been made and the power structure allows, that mistake is reversed. Check.
The part about rolling back women's rights? Perhaps a bit harder to argue. He had a very serious problem with Black women. It will be all crickets if DiC is asked to explain Kirk's problem with Simone Biles of all people. And of course, he advised Taylor Swift to submit to her husband. But you cannot argue, perhaps, that the effort was there to roll back women's rights.
So 2/3.
Did I mention that he had a few things to say that targeted Jews?
He was women need to quit college, no career, and make babies while following your husbands orders kind of misogynist.Of course the Mrs. Kirk has a full time job and advanced college degree..
Delete"This is an example of the dishonest demonization that helped persuade an unbalanced person to murder Kirk."
DeleteCharlie Kirk was a great believer in free speech. We must silence his critics in order to defend his great legacy,
"...demonization that helped persuade an unbalanced person to murder Kirk."
DeleteWhat sort of demonization helped persuade Trump to murder those Venezuelans?
"On the Oct. 12, 2022, episode of The Charlie Kirk Show, Kirk discussed how former U.S. president Bill Clinton used empathy and sympathy as a political strategy. In an aside, Kirk went off on the term empathy.
Delete"I can't stand the word empathy, actually. I think empathy is a made up new age term that does a lot of damage."
It is not uncommon for someone who doesn't feel something to assume that others are faking it and don't feel it either. This statement by Kirk makes him sound like a psychopath or sociopath, someone who doesn't feel empathy but believe that other people exist to be used and manipulated to meet their own needs.
Remember that the Republican MAGA Trump followers are the ones selling t-shirts saying "Fuck Your Feelings". Of course Democrats are more likely to feel empathy because they selected their party because they believe in helping others and caring about people more than property. Whereas Republicans did the opposite, selecting their party because it gives them permission to screw others, because Greed is Good and the Randian belief that everyone does everything out of self interest.
Hector - It's not demonization that persuades drug smugglers to kill around 100,000 Americans yearly, including my wife's cousin's son. They have a good reason. And, Trump has good reason to do what he can to minimize drug deaths.
DeleteIn recent decades we've became used to government "dealing with" a problem by just giving away a bunch of money. So, it seems disturbing for the government to take specific actions to solve a problem. E.g., Biden spent over a quarter of a trillion dollars trying to boost domestic semiconductor manufacturing, with limited success. Trump spent nothing and actually made money with tariffs. That had big success in boosting domestic semiconductor manufacturing.
https://duckduckgo.com/?q=biden+chips+act&atb=v426-1&ia=web
https://www.apple.com/newsroom/2025/08/apple-increases-us-commitment-to-600-billion-usd-announces-ambitious-program/
https://pr.tsmc.com/english/news/3210
If the justification for murdering suspected Venezuelan drug dealers is to minimize drug deaths, then shouldn't Trump also murder suspected US drug dealers?
DeleteDiC, doing away with due process certainly makes it easier for the State, doesn’t it? And you seem willing to allow the State to dispense with it when it suits their purposes, always remembering of course that the State must be run by your political allies.
DeleteFentanyl does not come from Venezuela. It comes from Mexico, largely smuggled by Americans.
DeletePutin and Netanyahu are shitting all over us, and King Orange Chickenshit is worried about canceling late night comedians, fucking over the black woman on the Fed that he is trying to railroad out of there, forcing a trump appointee attorney to quit because he refuses to file a criminal case against AG James on bullshit trumped up charges, and in his spare time bombing little motor boats off the coast of Venezuela to act like the tough punk he is.
DeletePresident Donald Trump on Truth Social: "We want Venezuela to immediately accept all of the prisoners, and people from mental institutions, which includes the Worst in the World Insane Asylums, that Venezuelan 'Leadership' has forced into the United States of America. Thousands of people have been badly hurt, and even killed, by these 'Monsters.' GET THEM THE HELL OUT OF OUR COUNTRY, RIGHT NOW, OR THE PRICE YOU PAY WILL BE INCALCULABLE!"
King Orange Chickenshit belongs in a straight jacket locked in a padded cell.
Go fuck yourself, Dickhead in Cal, you fucking fascist freak.
Hector, the Constitution doesn't apply to non-US residents on the open seas.
DeleteThe President of the United States can kill any non-US citizen on the open seas? Do foreign leaders have the right to kill US citizens on the open seas?
DeleteHow do we know whether any of the murdered, suspected drug dealers were US residents or not?
DeleteOne of the attacks was within Venezuelan waters.
DeleteThe Constitution applies to the president no matter where his targets are located.
DeleteOnly fascists want to have a president who thinks he is above the law.
DeleteLegalizing Presidential Murder
Published by digby on September 19, 2025
Trump thinks that the Constitution gives him the power to do anything he wants. He literally believes that and is acting accordingly. But apparently, some members of Congress are worried that he might not actually have the right to kill people indiscriminately as he’s doing down in the waters off the coast of Venezuela (and soon elsewhere) so they want to make it explicit:
Meanwhile, Fox is complaining because Biden went outdoors to eat ice cream. Tiedrich says:
ReplyDelete"the only thing you need to know about Fox’s creepy obsession with Joe Biden is that Donny’s name is on every page of the Epstein Files."
Maybe some day Somerby will notice that Fox serves as a distraction machine to deflect attention from Trump's participation in Epstein's activities with underage girls. He is still covering up for those guys, despite the pleas of 100 of the 1000+ Epstein victims. Talk about working in the shadows!
And Patel blatantly lied about the matter in congress.
DeleteWhile Somerby worries about Trump's mental health, the psychological well-being of the rest of us is being damaged:
ReplyDelete"It was eight months ago, on January 20, 2025, that Donald Trump — following a narrow victory over Democratic nominee Kamala Harris in the United States' 2024 election — began his second presidency. Trump's diehard MAGA supporters are praising his first eight months back in office as "promises made, promises kept," arguing that he is making good on his campaign promises and doing so at a rapid pace. But Trump's opponents view his second presidency as a full-fledged assault on everything from civil liberties to the economy to public health.
Criticism of Trump's Health and Human Services Department (HHS) secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. — the nephew of President John F. Kennedy — typically focuses on physical health. RKF Jr.'s anti-vaccine policies, according to MSNBC's Dr. Vin Gupta, are a recipe for spreading preventable diseases. And according to Chicago-based psychologist/author Michael Bader, the United States' "psychological wellbeing" is another casualty of the second Trump Administration.
In an article published by Salon on September 20 — exactly eight months after Trump was sworn into office — Bader argues that Trump is inflicting nonstop "moral injury" on the U.S.
"We are experiencing extreme moral injury, every single day," Bader explains. "So what do I mean by moral injury? That can happen when a soldier is ordered to torture, abuse or kill an enemy combatant or, worse yet, to harm civilians. Or when a drone operator learns, after an attack, that his drone killed several children. Or when a nurse administers a painful treatment to a terminally ill patient, knowing it is not likely to change the patient's ultimate fate in any way. Or when, during the COVID pandemic, medical professionals were forced to make impossible choices due to resource shortages — to decide who got ventilators, to ration out protective equipment or to work in conditions they knew were unsafe for their patients or themselves."
Bader continues, "Those situations, and others like them, are classic examples of moral injury. The individual afflicted feels guilt, shame and anger, but ultimately, and perhaps more important, feels — and is — objectively helpless to do anything about it…. I believe that under Donald Trump, millions upon millions of people are enduring daily moral injuries that are extremely harmful to psychological wellbeing."
According to Bader, protecting one's mental health is an ongoing challenge during Trump's second presidency.
"Under Trump and his cabal," Bader argues, "we are living in a nation in which tremendous harm is being perpetrated against innocent people and groups who cannot defend themselves. Every day, we see various forms of persecution, exploitation and oppression that violate our core values. The Trump Administration sends innocent people to what amounts to concentration camps for no good reason. The systems that support and guarantee our health are being defunded or otherwise undermined."
Bader continues, "We see institution after institution forced to bow to the corrupt authority of this administration in ways that are horrifying and degrading, and that violate basic human dignity and decency…. The only slim ray of hope offered to us is the possibility of a better electoral outcome in 2026 or 2028."
https://www.alternet.org/trump-michael-bader/
Hear! Hear!
DeleteFrom Hartmann's Saturday Report today:
ReplyDelete"1,800 Men Went Into Alligator Auschwitz, but when ICE started to shut down the facility, only 600 Came Out. As Charles Pierce writes for Esquire, “It appears that the agency is just as incompetent as it is cruel.” A federal judge, based on a lawsuit from the Miccosukee Tribe, ordered the concentration camp closed down and ICE began to comply, but somehow over a thousand men went missing. Nobody knows where they are. Deported to Africa? Dumped in the Everglades? Escaped (not likely)? Shipped to federal prisons or other facilities? Dealt with via Brian Kilmead’s “involuntary lethal injection” suggestion? Families are getting hysterical, worried about where their fathers, brothers, and sons have gone, but ICE is blaming the DeSantis administration (which built and ran the facility) and DeSantis is blaming ICE and nobody is taking responsibility for these missing human beings. And even more amazing, not a single major media outlet has bothered to pick the story up from the Miami Post and other Florida sources. Having masked secret police disappear people — permanently, apparently — has now become “normal,” just like in Germany in the late 1930s. Welcome to Amerika."
https://hartmannreport.com/p/saturday-report-92025-the-nazis-famously
This is serious. These are real people. This cannot happen in a free country, a democracy like ours. Why does no one seem to care about this, while they have gone gonzo over the shooting of one man? I am ashamed to live in a country that does this to people.
USA is not a democracy.
DeleteSt. Charlie of Kirk - white. Your missing men are brown. This country is racist as fuck. It's OK to be monsters about it again.
DeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteHow about those Rockies!
DeleteNot the Worst Ever! Hooray!
DeleteYou have to go back to the 1890s to find a worse record (so far). Worst in modern baseball. But we fans cheer when they accidentally win a game.
DeleteNow earn more than $15k per month by working online. i have got my 4th paycheck of $19632 and i gave this job just 2 hours from my whole busy day. very easy work to do and regular income from this are much better than other regular 9 to 5 office job. no special skills required all you need to do is copy and paste things and earns without selling anything. go to this web now for info.
ReplyDeleteHERE -------->> Www.Paycash1.site
""We Blues are the rational and moral animal," we Blues have long messaged and thought. The others—the ones over there—are the dumb and immoral ones. That's the picture we Blues have conveyed."
ReplyDeleteI doubt Aristotle was comparing groups of people to each other when he said this, as opposed to comparing people to other species, given that he uses the word animal. People are more rational than other types of animals because we rely on reason and not just instinct.
There are measurable differences between red and blue voters based on personality and values. Unless someone unthinkingly sticks to whatever party their parents belonged to, they choose a party based on their own characteristics, choosing the party that fits their ideas about what is moral, good, highest priority, important to society, and what fits their own personality. That makes it pretty natural that they will believe their own party to be superior along those lines, given that they chose it deliberately because of such things.
Somerby twists that natural line of thinking into a form of hubris, daily scolding blues for believing their party to be best, when reds believe exactly the same thing about themselves. Somerby's daily harrangue then amounts to picking on the blues for something that is not a failing, much less a sin, and little different than how the right feels. Certainly the right demonizes the values and beliefs of the left, but Somerby gives them a pass. They not only call blues satan but believe God is on their side. How is that for hubris! Then Somerby pretends that even Aristotle would scorn the blue tribe for thinking well of itself, when there is absolutely no evidence of that at all.
This sophistry is Somerby's excuse for denigrating blue America and applying a negative tone to our party for no valid reason. That's why I think his motive, his purpose here, is to turn people away from blue America without having to specify anything rational that someone might address and defend against. He gets whatever satisfaction or pay he receives for making readers feel icky about Dems. These empty smears permit him to claim he is a concern-trolling Democrat or liberal when he is working for the right to undermine Democrats at election time and detach the gullible from our party. And he gets the bonus of airing his grievances about female journalists who succeeded in writing, where Somerby failed, attacking his favorite targets, hiding behind blue values while saying bigoted stuff, and being an overall asshole. He may be playing some personal game of promoting bro white supremacy while pretending to study sacred Homer, or pushing right wing talking points without it being clear what he is doing -- how many fanboys can he convince without anyone catching on that he is a nihilistic jerk, much like Kirk.
One thing I am certain of, Aristotle would not approve.
Aristotle liked the Iliad.
DeleteHe gave an annotated copy of the Iliad to Alexander the Great, whom he was tutoring. I'll bet Somerby has not read the Iliad itself, just Knox's preface to it.
DeleteAlexander learned to be an Achaean, not a Trojan.
Delete@5:11 - I chose my party on which policies actually work best to produce what is moral, good, highest priority, important to society...
DeleteAristotle lived 300-500 years after Homer is thought to have written the Iliad, assuming he was a single person.
DeleteThen you have made a mockery of what is moral and good , and yourself, David, if you have chosen Trump.
DeleteI assume Aristotle was a single person.
DeleteHis work is sketchier than the man, whose existence was documented by others living at the same time. A lot of his work hasn’t survived.
DeleteTaegan Goddard is back to kicking Kamala Harris:
ReplyDeleteQuote of the Day
“If there’s a political strategy here, it’s a bad one. There’s an awful lot of grievances and finger-pointing that really doesn’t serve a political agenda.”
— David Axelrod, quoted by Politico, on Kamala Harris’ new book.
Meanwhile, Harris launched a Substack with a new excerpt from the book.
Harris has the last laugh. She has shown no intention of running again but has apparently left politics. I can’t really blame her and I’m glad she is explaining her decision.