THURSDAY, SEPTEMBER 4, 2025
Plus, his strangest behavior yet: Way back in 1914, James Joyce's collection of fifteen stories began with thoughts of "paralysis."
The collection bears the sacred name, Dubliners. Boasting a youthful, first-person narrator, the first story started like this:
The Sisters
There was no hope for him this time: it was the third stroke. Night after night I had passed the house (it was vacation time) and studied the lighted square of window: and night after night I had found it lighted in the same way, faintly and evenly. If he was dead, I thought, I would see the reflection of candles on the darkened blind for I knew that two candles must be set at the head of a corpse. He had often said to me: “I am not long for this world,” and I had thought his words idle. Now I knew they were true. Every night as I gazed up at the window I said softly to myself the word paralysis. It had always sounded strangely in my ears, like the word gnomon in the Euclid and the word simony in the Catechism. But now it sounded to me like the name of some maleficent and sinful being. It filled me with fear, and yet I longed to be nearer to it and to look upon its deadly work.
That's the first paragraph of the young Joyce's sacred first book. "Paralysis" is sitting right there, marked by its "deadly work.".
As it turned out, Father Flynn had died "a paralytic," felled by his third stroke. The paralysis introduced here had delivered him to the ranks of the (literally) dead.
Way back in 1906, the very young Joyce—he was just 24—had written to a timid, slightly paralyzed publisher, describing the intention behind his unusual book:
"My intention was to write a chapter in the moral history of my country and I chose Dublin for the scene because that city seemed to me the centre of paralysis."
At any rate, the cycle of stories started right there, with the literal death of the literally paralyzed Father Flynn. It ended with the longest story in the collection, the near novella which bears this famous title:
The Dead
The young Joyce wasn't playing around, even at age 24!
As we present-day Americans seek to understand the death-in-life of our own failing nation, we might consider abandoning the 24-second news cycle which now defeats our understanding. We might consider replacing it with certain similarities which may be lurking inside Joyce's first published text.
Last night, the garbage was general over the Fox News Channel. There seems to be very little "paralysis" over there.
Within the elites of Blue America, the situation may seem to be different. Consider the headlines one can see, this very morning, on the web site of the venerable Washington Post.
A bit more than fifty years ago, the Washington Post exploded into major prominence with its investigation of the "Watergate" matter.
It's a different paper today. This morning, at 7:45 a.m., these were the first ten (10) headlines seen on the front page of its web site. Each of these headlines offered readers a link:
The Washington Post
Trump officials ask Supreme Court to quickly allow sweeping tariffs
Inside the Trump team’s conflicting efforts to mend ties with India
RFK Jr. drives a wedge between red and blue states on vaccines
The case of the stolen pigeons:
Chinese tycoons turned pigeon racing into one of the world’s most lucrative sports. Then the thefts began.
House GOP weighing bills to remove elected D.C. attorney general, overhaul justice policies
At D.C. Superior Court, a system up at all hours under Trump’s order
National Guard deployment in D.C. expected to be extended for months
Plastic exposure before birth can leave babies with lifelong fertility issues
What’s the best frozen pizza brand? Our taste test found a clear winner.
The supermarket freezer aisle is awash in ready-to-bake pizzas. We found a clear favorite.
This foliage map tells you when to see peak colors across the U.S.
This year’s map forecasts an early arrival of colors in the Northeast, while the West Coast and Southeast may experience foliage delays.
In this age of the flooding of the zone, most of those headlines linked to serious news reports about actual news topics. The stolen pigeons and the best frozen pizza were possibly included just for fun. Plus the foliage map!
At any rate, there they sat—the newspapers top ten headlines! After that, as we continued to scroll, we encountered this array of eight (8) "stories" which offered us even more news:
More top stories
Texas moves to allow anyone to sue abortion pill prescribers, distributors
Death toll rises to 17 after Lisbon’s popular Glória funicular derails
Trump administration rescinds protected status for 250,000 Venezuelans
Trump ordered strike on suspected drug boat to send a message, Rubio says
D.C. can predict who will get into car crashes but can’t stop them
Heard on a hot mic: Xi and Putin discuss living to age 150
House Republicans form new subcommittee to reinvestigate Jan. 6 attack
Putin may live to 150? A Post subscriber may have to live that long to encounter reporting about the topic for which we were searching this day!
We'd now encountered links to eighteen (18) different news reports. At this point, as we scrolled on, we encountered a section bearing this name:
Latest from The Post
The section included eight (8) additional offerings. Two of the eight were these:
Analysis / Mark Maske
NFL primer: Can the onside kick be saved? Plus, the top games in Week 1.
Analysis / Neil Greenberg
Predicting win-loss records for all 32 NFL teams
The count was now 26. After that came the day's "Better Living" section. Links were offered to four (4) more reports, not excluding these
Column / Ellie Krieger
Pear overnight oats show why this breakfast has stood the test of time
The health risk linked to scrolling too long while on the toilet
By now, we subscribers had been directed (or misdirected) to thirty (30) offerings. Now we came to another section. Its featured report was this:
Politics & Government
Judge rules Trump administration cannot withhold funding from Harvard
That was a perfectly serious topic. By now, our roll stood at 31.
As we'd scrolled down the Post's front page, we'd been invited to click on 31 links. Finally, we reviewed a set of six additional reports in that same Politics & Government section
This subset was offered in smaller print. Finally, though, we saw the topic for which we'd been searching. The link to it read like this:
Epstein accusers join lawmakers to push for full release of documents
At long last, there it stood!
Yesterday, this event had been widely featured on two of the three major "cable news" channels. Perhaps a bit paralytically, perhaps driven by deference to power and by a bit of fear, the Washington Post had managed to squeeze it in at number 32 on today's play list:
That placed it below the discussion of onside kicks, and below the news report about the danger of excessive toilet scrolling. We've reported, now you can decide!
As decent people, we whispered a silent prayer of thanksgiving. We thanked the God of all Irish Catholics for the fact that the ambitious young Joyce never had to see this version of what might be a form of a type of moral "paralysis."
As for our youthful analysts, their souls swooned slowly as they heard the snow falling faintly through the universe and faintly falling, like the descent of their last end, upon all the living and the dead.
(We're borrowing from the closing paragraph of The Dead as we bring you that report.)
Yesterday, there they were, the survivors or victims—take your pick—of Jeffrey Epstein and Gislaine Maxell, a pair of convicted criminals.
Yesterday, they told their stories in a press event outside the Capitol Building. On CNN and MSNBC, this was treated, throughout the day and on into the evening, as a major news event.
On the Fox News Channel—no paralysis there!—the various messenger pigeons found a different array of topics with which to fills their hours. Various targets were slimed again when Greg Gutfeld took to the air.
It was a major event on two news channels, almost wholly avoided on one. This morning, at the Washington Post, the event had barely occurred.
The New York Times did somewhat better. In this morning's print editions, the report appears inside the paper, on page A14.
It didn't make the paper's front page. It's listed as the fifth of eighteen news reports in the online "National" section.
It appears right below the fourth report. As seen in print editions, here are the headlines in question:
Brewery Owner in Maine Joins Push to Unseat Collins
G.O.P. Leaders Thwart Epstein Disclosure Bill as Accusers Plead for Files
Accusers had been pleading for files, the headline said. Here's the headline which appears online, along with the opening paragraphs:
G.O.P. Thwarts Epstein Disclosure Bill as Accusers Plead for Files
With the Capitol towering behind them, several women who said they had been among Jeffrey Epstein’s victims shared harrowing stories of sexual abuse, pleading with members of Congress to demand that the Trump administration release all of its investigative files in the case.
Lawmakers in both parties stood behind them, vowing to keep the pressure on for the disclosures.
Even one of Mr. Trump’s closest allies, Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene of Georgia, said the files must come out.
None of it appeared to be enough to outweigh the pressure from Mr. Trump and Republican leaders, who have moved quickly to squelch legislation that would require the Justice Department to quickly and completely release what it uncovered about Mr. Epstein, the disgraced financier and convicted sex offender who died in prison in 2019 while awaiting trial on sex trafficking charges.
Momentum was flagging behind an effort by Representatives Thomas Massie, Republican of Kentucky, and Ro Khanna, Democrat of California, to force the House to vote on the measure, after most Republicans who initially said they would back it fell in line with the president’s exhortations to let the issue die.
We aren't saying that report is wrong, though the BBC said that the "several" women were actually nine in number. We're saying that a bit of "paralysis" may have infested the treatment of this topic at the Washington Post.
Meanwhile, here's something you may not get to read about at the Post or at the Times. Under present arrangements, you have to go to Mediaite to learn about bizarre behavior like this:
Trump Goes on Bizarre, Digitally-Altered Posting Bender About His Political Enemies
President Donald Trump unleashed a torrent of Truth Social posts featuring digitally altered videos of some of his political enemies on Wednesday night. The posts featured some of his favorite targets, including California Governor Gavin Newsom and Sen. Adam Schiff (D-CA).
After publishing boilerplate posts about the Social Security Administration and his meeting with the president of Poland earlier in the day, the president’s timeline got weird, even by his posting standards.
Intriguing! Just how "weird" were the president's posts? Was his bender really "bizarre?"
We're going to say that it very much was—that it was the most bizarre yet. Michael Luciano's report continues along as shown, but you'll have to click over to his report to actually see the apparent illness which might seem to be involved here:
The bizarre bender began with a post about Rosie O’Donnell, who moved to Ireland after Trump won last year’s election. (Screenshots of the president’s posts are posted below instead of embedded posts, as Truth Social’s embed feature seems to be non-functional with some content management systems):
“As previously mentioned, we are giving serious thought to taking away Rosie O’Donnell’s Citizenship,” Trump wrote. “She is not a Great American and is, in my opinion, incapable of being so!”
This would be the last post in the series that included text. The rest were AI videos or videos that had been otherwise altered in some way.
They included a video of Schiff with an elongated neck...
And so on from there.
The president had started with a suggestion that Rosie O'Donnell's citizenship might now be revoked. That was high sanity compared to what came next.
You'll have to click to Luciano's report to see those altered photos. Incredibly, this is what the president has apparently posted concerning Senator Schiff.
Is something wrong with President Trump? We've asked this fairly obvious question again and again, noting that any such situation would of course be tragic state of affairs.
We've asked and asked and asked. You'll have to turn to the extremely strange visuals at Mediaite to encounter what seems to be an answer to that question.
"Silence invaded the suburbs," the poet Auden said, in honor of the poet Yeats.
("Earth, receive an honoured guest: William Yeats is laid to rest...")
Has a type of paralysis, in the form of a silence, invaded the Washington Post?
Regarding the victims of Epstein and Maxwell, yesterday's open air presser had seemed to be a fairly substantial event. It was virtually disappeared by the Post, given somewhat limited play at the Times.
More broadly, these newspapers refuse to discuss the possible state of the president's mental health, with respect to which we would strongly suggest that you look at the visuals which appear at Mediaite via the Truth Social site.
Our question:
Might we see portraits of our current Blue American selves in the page of Dubliners? In its final story, The Dead?
Are we Blues possibly trapped in a form of walking death, in a form of moral paralysis? If we want to see ourselves more clearly, should we perhaps step back from the current news cycle? Might we try to look inside such honored writing instead?
Tomorrow: Additional language from The Dead:
The air of the room chilled his shoulders. He stretched himself cautiously along under the sheets and lay down beside his wife. One by one they were all becoming shades. Better pass boldly into that other world, in the full glory of some passion, than fade and wither dismally with age.
ReplyDelete"Is something wrong with President Trump? We've asked this fairly obvious question again and again, noting that any such situation would of course be tragic state of affairs."
Oh, tragic, no less!
Here's a free advice, a recommendation for you, Bob: why don't you pull that stick out of your ass, relax, and enjoy those jokes and altered photos and what-not.
Or, if you positively can't enjoy them, why don't you avoid looking at them? Otherwise, you sound like a mentally ill sado-maso nutcase, y'know.
The venerable “JK” defense.
DeleteRight! What does it matter if the leader of the free world seems to have the mentality of a sixth grader? Enjoy the show!
ReplyDeleteWhat matters to me is that "the leader of the free world" is an actual human being. Not an Autopen, or an Al Gore-style or Barak Obama-style mindless robotic creature.
DeleteBut ymmv, obviously. If you prefer Autopen, that's fine.
... an actual human being
DeleteI don't these words mean what you think they mean. The irony here is extra thick.
What matters to me is how can you be so deluded. On the other hand you won't get vaccinated and will die sooner, so I got that going for me.
DeleteI fade and wither dismally with age.
ReplyDeleteI wonder why the Post and the Times didn't give the Epstein survivors press conference story more prominence. After all, a large amount of people think that Trump is a child rapist based on that story. The larger amount of people think that Epstein was running a black male child pedo ring.
ReplyDeleteMaybe the press conference didn't do anything to advance those ideas. Maybe because it was too bipartisan. Or maybe the girls themselves were not convincing and it showed that none of them were children or even under the age of consent when the events in question happened.
Blackmail
DeleteI wonder why you are an idiot.
DeleteDid the press conference advance the idea that Trump is a child rapist? Did it advance the idea that there is an international pedo ring run by elites? If it did it probably would have gotten better placement.
DeleteInstead, it was mostly a bunch of women who were 21 years old when they took money to masturbate Epstein and have subsequently cashed in big time through various settlements while an unsubstantiated meme exists that they were children and part of some international elite conspiracy.
DeleteRepublicans, the party promoting child sex trafficking and child rape.
DeleteMake sure you inject that "21 years old" into your defense.
DeleteLiar.
1:09: most were 14-16 years old, below the age of consent. The funny thing is “ unsubstantiated meme exists that they were children and part of some international elite conspiracy” was a “meme” pushed by the right wing. It’s funny, too, because, for their being nothing to see here, Trump sure is trying to hide it, after spending his whole campaign promising to release the files.
DeleteThe survivors say they were raped by Epstein. Rape is rape no matter what your age.
DeleteMost of them were in their early twenties. You will see if you research it. Giving your feelings about the right wing, shouldn't you think twice about adopting one of their memes whole cloth?
DeleteBut you're right about Trump and definitely right, they should release all the information about it. Unredacted.
They were paid by Epstein. Basically they were prostitutes. And they don't say they are raped. You just make shit up.
Delete1:48: You may not have noticed, but every Democrat voted to release the information. So far, almost all Republicans voted against it. Why is Trump hiding it?
DeleteThe meme has been adopted by both parties because citizens of both parties are manipulated and exploited by elites. The unsubstantiated story of a cabal of elite child rapists is a way for the victims of this economic exploitation to unconsciously deal with the pain and frustration and, importantly, the powerlessness, they feel as victims of an economic system that exploits and deceives them, which is a phenomenon that has been substantiated. It's an unconscious way to compensate for powerlessness.
DeleteThat's why we turn these 22-year-olds into 14-year-olds and invent fantastic stories about pedol rings. It becomes a psychic container for real pain and real powerlessness and real abuse that we all suffer at the hands of an elite cabal.
"Most of them" is not all of them. How many minors is it OK to rape before people should care what happened to them? Is 20 too many, are 3 too few? There were 1000+ victims. If only 5 minors were raped, does that make it OK and no one should care or talk about them as underage girls (more commonly known as children because they are not legally adults and are not fully mature the way one would be if termed a woman). Some were as young as 13 when they became spa girls at Mar a Lago (Virginia Guiffre). She was recruited by Maxwell at 16 and abandoned by Epstein by 23. His clients weren't there for adult women after all, pedophiles have a favorite age.
DeleteI have no idea why Trump is hiding it. Yesterday they were Republicans and Democrats with the so-called survivors. It was bipartisan.
DeleteSo funny. Now there's a thousand victims.
DeleteNo I'm just saying most of them were in their twenties. That's all. It wasn't all child rape as some people are led to believe.
Delete"How many minors is it OK to rape"
DeleteRape is a violent crime. "Statutory rape", which is what you're talking about here, is not. If would be better is the crime known as "statutory rape" didn't have the word "rape" in it.
Imagine this scenario. A girl has been a sex worker for Epstein but returns to normal life. How does she explain to a prospective husband that she worked for Epstein when she was younger (even if over 21)? How does she go back to college and listen to naive and inexperienced girls gush over dreamy boyfriends and not feel jaded and dirty and used, with no basis in experience for joining the girl talk? How can she be with a man she might be attracted to, even love, when she hates the men who abused her and cannot see men as innocent? How does she let someone touch her when it makes her skin crawl, even if it is someone she likes? Sexual PTSD is a thing. It is very hard to come back after being part of Epstein's operation.
DeleteStatutory rape is rape because the person being raped does not have the capacity to consent. The same is true for women raped while unconscious or drugged. Pretending that this is not rape is the problem. If you seriously believe that having sex with someone underage is OK because she might have been enthusiastic about the sex, then you are an ignorant asshole. Young girls are protected from statutory rape because pregnancy and sex at an early age is bad for them in terms of their physical health (higher maternal mortality & STD) and mental health. A young girl is inexperienced and cannot defend herself against the manipulative behavior of older men.
DeleteThe men who are attracted to underage girls are generally sexually inadequate and they fear comparison with other men that would occur with older women. They seek someone they can "train" (which means manipulate and control). That is an abusive relationship, assuming it involves more than take it and leave sex).
You should not want to put yourself in that category by arguing that under-age girls should be fair game.
Rape is damaging to women. Women, not self-serving men, should decide what constitutes damage and what causes it. Statutory rape is damaging to girls and to women in other situations where they cannot give consent. For example, being raped while under the influence of an anesthetic in a hospital (with or without consent).
This idea that violence is necessary for it to be rape, or a stranger must be involved, or that a husband cannot rape his wife, or that a woman who gets too drunk is fair-game, etc., is all the stuff warped men tell themselves in order to justify forcing a woman to do something she doesn't want to do, and that is harmful or bad for her to do.
I suggest using that criterion of potential harm in your decision making, not the letter of some law you think shouldn't exist in the first place. It may keep you out of jail.
DeleteAll heterosexual sex is rape.
They were young adult women who performed sex acts in exchange for money. It's the oldest profession in the world.
DeleteProbably for amounts of money, for a single sex act, that a typical working stiff won't get for a month of hard labor.
DeleteBut hey, now they are the victims!
I think it was $300 per masturbation session and he was having three of them a day. Which seems like a horrible compensation, IMO.
DeleteTheir true compensation has come with the settlements. It's estimated Virginia Roberts got over $10 million through the various settlements.
Some explicitly said that they were not victims in 2019 but once the settlement money started getting thrown around, they decided that they were.
2:55 isn’t doing much to dispel the notion that MAGATS are all in on pedophilia and child rape. Good going, 2:55.
DeleteNo, it wasn't child rape, it was prostitution of women in their early twenties.
DeleteYou're just attracted to that notion because you are raped by a cabal of elites economically but are completely powerless, like children are in many situations, to do anything about it.
Hmm. If it's all-inclusive accommodations (food, shelter, etc.) plus $1k/day for 3 hand-jobs, it doesn't really seem like a horrible compensation. With no experience, no diploma, no nothing. Try to find a job like that.
DeleteYou sound like a male. If you're a normal male, giving a handjob to another male would, naturally, seem like a highly unpleasant idea to you. Giving a handjob to a lady, on the other hand, might be a different story.
DeleteAs for a long claptrap earlier in this thread, I haven't read it, but based on experience it's entirely meaningless software-generated nonsense.
Oops. There was a 3:35 comment here, but it disappeared. 3:43 is a reply.
DeleteEverybody has their price. The main point is we are talking about women in their early twenties who were compensated. Not children who were raped. And there's no evidence of an elite cabal. And that doesn't really make sense when you drill down and include the spectrum of fetishes these elites may have which extends far beyond just young girls.
DeleteSpeaking of claptraps, Ghislaine may be fun get on the massage table with. What do you think?
DeleteThe 100 victims claim they were raped. I believe them, not you @3:50.
DeleteHow much money would you accept in exchange for being raped?
This comment must emanate from the fevered swamp regions of the dark MAGA web.
ReplyDeleteIt would be interesting to know who or what the fuck you're referring to.
Delete11:54. My bad, for posting a new thread rather than attaching it to 11:54's comment.
DeleteWhy would you say that George? It's true that these Epstein "victims" were mostly in their early twenties. The whole Epstein thing has turned into a mass psychological hysteria with the accompanying misinformation and overstatement. It's not unlike The Scarlet letter. It's a true psychological hysteria. People all over are claiming about raping babies and mass pedo rings, none of which has been remotely substantiated. And it most certainly has nothing to do with partisan ideology. I think it's just this necessary psychological outlet for what we all know is economic system that completely controls us, which includes both parties. And we are all basically powerless to do anything about it. It's a way to deal with that on a psychological level.
Delete"The larger amount of people think that Epstein was running a black male child pedo ring."
DeleteThis must come from the MAGA swamps.
Sorry brother, that was just my voice to text.
Delete"blackmail"
DeleteSo many people, a lot of them are maga, think there's a child sex pedo rape blackmail ring based on the Epstein saga. But even an hour of research will show you that the idea is basically insane. And the Epstein saga itself is full of misinformation and overstatement. I think it brings comfort to people in complex psychological ways.
This sounds like a way of exaggerating Epstein crime so that it can be dismissed.
DeleteFor better or for worse, when people like Newsom and O'Donnell childishly insult Trump, he responds by childishly insulting them. Only he's better at it. Advice to Trump's enemies: "Never Wrestle with a Pig. You Both Get Dirty and the Pig Likes It."
ReplyDeleteNewsome does whatever his consultants order him to do; that a different story.
DeleteAnd between Rosie O'Donnell and Donald Trump, obviously O'Donnell is a pig, not Trump. She's the one enjoying it, all that publicity, well passed her expiration date.
And you are beneath contempt.
DeleteMore generally, I wonder why some MAGA types enjoy insulting women?
Triggered, Hillary?
DeleteAnother example of what a clueless chode David in Cal is. Have you all called your congressperson today to tell them to impeach the idiot RFK Jr.? www.congress.gov/contact-us All our lives defend on stopping the fucking idiocracy.
DeleteDG -- A woman insulted me, calling me "deplorable, racist, sexist, homophobic, xenophobic, Islamophobic". Am I precluded from insulting her back because she's a woman?
DeleteDavid in Cal, his momma never taught him how to be a gentleman, always bragging about what an asshole he is.
DeleteNewsome owns the toddler's befuddled demented little brain.
DeleteDoes it not seem odd, DiC, that the fucking President of the United States is so thin skinned that he feels the need to elevate Rosie O’Donnell’s criticism and prove what a fucking snowflake the “leader of the free world” is? That you would defend his childishness is pathetic.
Delete
DeleteInsulting idiot-Democrats is a good fun. Do you mind, 1:24?
And oh, it's so horrible that the fucking President of the United States didn't get the permission from Anonymous @1:24 to make fun of fucking Rosie O'Donnell. How dare him.
He called attention to her criticism. He is a baby.
DeleteHe's the President, elected three times already, over three specimens of your shape-shifting alien Reptiloids. And you're a lowlife TDS bot.
DeleteYes, @1:24. Trump's behavior is certainly odd. Childish insults should be beneath the dignity of a President. OTOH throughout much of my life Republicans faced horrible insults and didn't respond it kind. It's kind of refreshing to see Republicans fight back with the same weapon.
DeleteYour belief that Republicans did not respond in kind just means you weren't paying attention.
Delete1:36: yes, the daily “two minutes of hate” is a standard component of any dictatorship, as Orwell pointed out. So the MAGA masses must be regaled daily with hatred of Democrats. It serves to channel their economic anxiety into a more manageable form.
Delete
DeleteYeah, poor magas. Since about 10 years ago we idiot-Democrats are practicing rabid hatred 24x7.
“ Last night, the garbage was general over the Fox News Channel. There seems to be very little "paralysis" over there.”
ReplyDeleteI disagree that Fox News doesn’t exhibit “paralysis.” They did not carry the survivors’ press conference. They are too paralyzed to criticize Trump or even report negative stories about him. (Not sure why “garbage” is supposed to represent non-paralysis. It seems to be required that they spew it.)
Here is the paralysis that existed when James Joyce wrote his book based on the premise that Ireland was paralyzed:
ReplyDelete"In 1906 Ireland experienced cultural revitalization with renewed interest in Irish language and dance, the formation of the Theatre of Ireland after a split from the Abbey Theatre, and the award of the Freedom of Dublin to Douglas Hyde. Politically, it marked a period of diminished focus on Irish Home Rule by the British Liberal government, who won a majority in the 1906 election, but this would change with subsequent elections in 1910, leading to increased dependency on the Irish Parliamentary Party. "
I think Joyce was as big an asshole as Somerby.
Was there an insurgency in 1906 Ireland?
Delete"Yes, there were signs of an escalating insurgency in Ireland around 1906, though not a fully-fledged war. A period known as the Ranch War was occurring, characterized by rural agitation against landlords, led by the United Irish League. Furthermore, the secretive Irish Republican Brotherhood (IRB) was active and reorganizing, laying the groundwork for future armed resistance and ultimately the 1916 Easter Rising. "
The paralysis in the first story by Joyce, quoted above, was literal not figurative. Somerby needs some justification for extending it as a metaphor to talk about our times, but no one is paralyzed by Trump on the left. There are huge demonstrations ongoing in cities (yes, the shitholes), lawsuits are still being won by the left in the courts to roll back Trump's most egregious illegal acts (of course that is whack-a-mole), Dems are winning special elections and flipping the governorships in red states. The prediction of a large swing toward Dems in the midterms remains, despite gerrymandering (effectively countered by Newsom). There is determined resistance on the left that is growing, not abating. There is no reason for Somerby to call this silence or paralysis. That seems like wishful thinking designed to reassure Trump's base, but why would a liberal write such stuff? Perhaps because Somerby hasn't been liberal for some time now.
ReplyDeleteOddly, the worse Somerby gets, the more right wing trolls show up here.
ReplyDeleteThat nice little ode to Yeats which Somerby inserts for no good reason into today's essay neglects to tell readers that Yeats was a fascist. Are we celebrating the lives of fascists now?
ReplyDeleteCan we celebrate someone's writing apart from their politics? Is that something we're allowed to do?
DeleteNo. Fascism hurts people and writing that advances fascism is complicit in the harm. You cannot separate “writing” from yhe meaning expressed.
DeleteWhy does Somerby quote so many right wing poets here and so few liberals? Robt Frost, ee cummings, Yeats, all conservatives.
Here's RFK Jr., responding to a question whether he fired CDC Director Monarez for refusing to sign off on changes to the childhood vaccine schedule:
ReplyDelete“No, I told her she had to resign because I asked her, ‘Are you a trustworthy person?’ And she said, ‘no,’” Kennedy responded.
Kennedy then added helpfully: “If you had an employee who told you they weren’t trustworthy, would you ask them to resign, senator?”
Raise your hand if you think anything resembling this conversation took place.
And then do some deep thinking with me: if Monarez is in fact untrustworthy, then isn't her admission of untrustworthiness itself untrustworthy, thus implying her trustworthiness? So shouldn't Bobby have kept her on?
Thank God for RFK Jr. The swamp of pharma and everything else health-related, it badly needs draining. Badly. Keep draining the swamp, Secretary.
DeleteIs your comment trustworthy? (think carefully before you reply)
DeleteIn 1906 the theory of relativity was one year old, but Yeats took no note of it.
ReplyDelete