THURSDAY: Coarse and violent, Mika says!

THURSDAY, OCTOBER 2, 2025

She refuses to say who she means: Tom Nichols isn't a doctor. He isn't a medical or psychological specialist.

Neither is Lawrence O'Donnell! In our view, O'Donnell has been the go-to guy, within the past month, for reactions to the ongoing conduct of President Trump. But was he possibly over his skies in this presentation on last evening's Last Word?

MSNBC’s Lawrence O’Donnell Lashes Out at ‘Insane’ Trump in Blistering Rant Calling for His Removal: ‘Trump Has Lost His Mind!’

MSNBC host Lawrence O’Donnell went off on “insane” President Donald Trump in a blistering rant calling for his removal from office under the 25th Amendment.

Trump followed Secretary of War Pete Hegseth’s address to military leaders Tuesday morning with a lengthy speech that featured several bonkers moments and characteristic deviations—as well as a lot of talk about “enemies” within the United States.

On Wednesday night’s edition of MSNBC’s The Last Word, O’Donnell declared that Trump “has lost his mind” and repeatedly invoked the removal clause while suggesting Vice President JD Vance is getting ready to step in:

O'DONNELL: It sure looked like 25th Amendment day in the White House today, where Donald Trump was not publicly visible, and the vice president of the United States took to the microphone on day one of the government shutdown to basically assure the country, I guess, that he’s in charge. And very specifically and deliberately to draw attention to Donald Trump’s public insanity by actively seeking out an opportunity to talk publicly about Donald Trump’s manifestations of outright insanity.

"Outright insanity" is a rant, not a diagnosis. It involves no actual medical terms. Nor is O'Donnell qualified, in any known way, to talk about such medical issues with any kind of expertise or specialized knowledge.

To his credit, O'Donnell actually is a high-end broadcast journalist. He's also deeply experienced. As such. he's qualified to interview specialists with a greater degree of skill than the average Joe might display. 

Years back, O'Donnell did interview high-ranking medical specialists about the possibility that President Trump was experiencing serious mental health issues. O'Donnell was one of the very few mainstream figures who was willing to ignore the unspoken prohibition of such conduct within the mainstream guild.

As far as we know, he hasn't done so lately. It's always possible that such specialists will no longer speak in public, given the degree of retribution this second term White House has now put on display.

As we've noted, we think O'Donnell has let his disgust for the sitting president cloud his judgment at times. In our view, Tom Nichols was a bit too coy, in the past day or two, as to what he was actually talking about. On last night's show, it seemed to us that O'Donnell broke the other way.

In this morning's report, we spoke about the way Nichols had seemed reluctant to say what he was talking about when he said the president "didn't seem OK"—when he eventually seemed to wonder, in his column for The Atlantic, if the sitting president was "sane." 

We've often told you about a second refusal to speak. We've cited the way journalists at MSNBC refuse to say who they're talking about when they criticize inexcusable, destructive behavior by people on the Fox News Channel.

How bad are things at this point on the Fox News Channel—indeed, in the MAGA world altogether as its hidden secession proceeds? In his new column for the New York Times, David French quotes Ben Shapiro saying this to Ezra Klein:

Incompetence Isn’t an Upgrade Over D.E.I.

[...]

One of the most important distinctions in politics is the difference between people who are mainly motivated to vote against their opponents rather than for their allies. Their hatred or fear of their opponents is far more important than their embrace of any particular policy or ideology.

This concept, called “negative partisanship,” is spreading like a virus across American politics, and it’s reaching its culmination in Donald Trump’s Republican Party. Ben Shapiro, one of the most popular right-wing podcasters in America, recently spoke with my colleague Ezra Klein and described the modern G.O.P. perfectly.

“I think that on the right there is such a rage that has arisen,” he said, “at least on part of the right, that the tendency is to just rip things out by their roots, rather than trying to correct or even determining whether the thing can be corrected.”

Shapiro was describing a type of blind, nihilistic rage on the part of many on the MAGA right. It's a rage which may be built on legitimate complaints, but is characterized by its unregulated fury and sense of entitlement.

We know of no one who has been displaying that rage more promiscuously of late than the Fox News Channel's Greg Gutfeld. Pitifully, his furious conduct has suddenly been swinging in the direction of race-based insult, as opposed his more typical insults based on his fairly obvious, weirdly undisguised devotion to woman hatred.

Something is tragically wrong with that furious, 61-year-old Bay Area child—but over on MSNBC, there seems to exist a policy against the naming of names and against the quoting of poisonous remarks. As reported and transcribed by Mediaite, here was Mika Brzezinski on yesterday's Morning Joe:

‘No! No!’ Joe Scarborough Yells at Wife Mika Brzezinski During MSNBC Clash About Democrats ‘Whining’

[...]

"I also just don’t understand why we’re blaming the Democrats for Republicans lying at the highest levels of office. They have the biggest megaphone. They have TV networks that repeat the lies and say things on those networks with no consequence and the things they say are violent, okay? So they’re not only repeating the lies but adding to this coarseness and there’s no consequence to it, and we’re blaming the Democrats? We’re blaming the Democrats for this. What exactly are the Democrats supposed to do?"

We apologize for subjecting you to Mediaite's silly headlines. That said:

According to Mika, unnamed people on unnamed networks are "repeating lies." Also, they're making violent statements which contribute to the coarseness of our failing discourse. 

Especially in light of some recent incidents, we'll guess that she was talking about Gutfeld's slithery, towel-snapping partner, Jesse Watters, and possibly Brian Kilmeade. But she wasn't willing to name any names, not even of the network in question.

By way of contrast:

On Fox, the children trash Joe and Mika all the time. The dumbest people in the history of American broadcast "news" routinely trash the people whose daily discussions of foreign affairs are the smartest conversations found anywhere around the "cable news" dial.

The flyweights trash Joe and Mika all the time! Judging from appearances, Joe and Mika aren't allowed to even report what is said on Fox.

What was Nichols talking about? Who was Mika talking about? What sorts of coarse and violent things have been said at the Fox News Channel? 

Sorry, Charlie:

All across the Blue American firmament, journalists refuse to report and discuss what the flyweights are doing at Fox. To appearances, no one wants to tussle with Fox. It simply isn't done!

Still coming: The New York Times pretends to profile one of Gutfeld's willing enablers

58 comments:

  1. If this is accurate, it shows why the National Guard is needed in Portland.
    Reporter reveals black eye allegedly from Portland Antifa protester hitting her with flagpole: ‘Complete lawlessness’
    https://nypost.com/2025/10/02/us-news/journalists-black-eye-from-antifa-attack-in-portland/

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. This incident involved a reporter being hit in the eye by the end of a flagpole. It is being investigated by police. It is unclear whether it was accidental or whether it even happened as described. There is no such thing as Antifa. David doesn't say, but both the reporter and the alleged protester are female. An incident like this, whether deliberate or accidental, does not suggest "Complete lawlessness". Flags on poles can be awkward to carry but are within anyone's first ammendment right to carry in protest. Or the reporter was hit in the face by her boyfriend and doesn't want to say so. As Somerby says, Anything is Possible.

      Delete
    2. Quaker in a BasementOctober 2, 2025 at 3:16 PM

      Same article:

      "Police said they met with the victim and that the case is being investigated by its Major Crimes Unit."

      Really, David? THIS is why the NG is needed in Portland?

      Delete
    3. All Portlandians become members of Antifa at birth. That saves the govt the expense of issuing membership cards.

      Delete
    4. The next good faith comment posted by David in Cal will his first.

      Delete
    5. Let me make sure I got it straight, David: a person allegedly getting a black eye from a hit, possibly accidental, necessitates national guard deployment?
      I'll take a walk to the site of the protests this weekend and report back. Somehow, the ravages of war haven't made it to my hood, up the hill a little.

      Delete
    6. Biden had so much acumen

      Delete
    7. Be careful Ilya. Sudden wind shifts will continue to fuel the terrorist Antifa fires devastating your once peaceful city. Sad. I will always remember dear, sweet, Portland, before she fell.

      Delete
  2. No one cares whether Mika was talking about Gutfeld or someone else. Here is important news:

    "A federal judge ruled that President Donald Trump's administration violated the First Amendment rights of pro-Palestinian students who are in the country on student visas by attempting to deport them. But, analysts on Wednesday were more stunned by the language the judge used in his opinion than by the crimes the administration purportedly committed.

    On Tuesday, Judge William G. Young of the U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts ruled that Secretary of State Marco Rubio's efforts to deport student visa holders because of their political views violated the students' free speech rights.

    "This case—perhaps the most important ever to fall within the jurisdiction of this district court—squarely presents the issue whether non-citizens lawfully present here in [the] United States actually have the same free speech rights as the rest of us," Young wrote in his opinion. "The Court answers this Constitutional question unequivocally ‘yes, they do.’ ‘No law’ means ‘no law.’ The First Amendment does not draw President Trump’s invidious distinction, and it is not to be found in our history or jurisprudence.”

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The judge included in his ruling a 12-page assessment of the president himself, saying that Trump routinely ignores the Constitution, laws, regulations and customs while governing but will readily and aggressively deploy the legal system against those who stand in his way.

      “Now that he is our duly elected President after a full and fair election, he not only enjoys broad immunity from any personal liability, he is prepared to deploy all the resources of the nation against obstruction,” Young wrote. “Daunting prospect, isn’t it?”

      Delete
    2. IANAL but this 12 page assessment seems improper. It shows that the judge has an animus toward Trump. S/he's not unbiased.

      Delete
    3. The animus results from Trump’s arguments and actions in the brief. The judge’s response is not reflecting bias but making a judicial decision. Trump showed no respect for the law.

      Delete
    4. C'mon, @5:15. You know how this works. If a judge rules against Trump, that's proof of bias right there. Trump is always right about everything.

      Delete
    5. I am biased against all sex offenders. Not singling Trump out, he is wholly within that Venn diagram circle.

      Delete
  3. Somerby's main complaint seems to be that Nichols and Mika are not naming names. But if we know the names of those they are criticizing what have we gained?

    I am glad O'Donnell is talking about Trump's obvious disability. Is it fair to criticize the press for not talking about it (as Somerby claims) and then turn around and criticize O'Donnell for talking about it but not being a shrink in addition to a news commentator? Very Catch-22ish!

    You don't have to be a doctor to see the bruises on Trump's hand and his attempt to hide them, the cankles of swollen flesh in his lower legs, his inability to open his eyes to the same extent or to have them track together (strabismus), his inability to stand for an hour at that podium without leaning his weight on it and grasping it with both hands, his slips and falls going up stairs, his disorientation on that escalator, his slurred speech and wandering train of thought, and the utter and complete craziness of the things he says in all contexts.

    When someone declines with dementia, the wife or husbands notices first, then other family members, then friends and work associates start wondering if something is wrong, asking the family about specific behaviors they've observed. Then there is a trip to the primary care physician, then specialists who do testing and tell the family what is going on, the etiology, treatment plan and prognosis (how long and how bad things will get). We are at the stage with Trump where his problems are obvious to all who are paying attention. The doctors and family surely know. The close associates know too. There is a plan to shield Trump and keep his grift going as long as possible, but he is going down fast, too fast to last until the end of his term.

    The problem is not that Trump has not been diagnosed, but that the right wants to keep pretending he is OK without involving the left or the public in the plan for the nation after his inability to function demands removal. That is unacceptable, whether you are Mika or O'Donnell or Nichols or anyone else. Gutfeld is helping the right in its cover up. So is Somerby, to the extent that he keeps ignoring the next steps that need to be taken in favor of pointing fingers and blaming various members of the press, and all of blue America.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Demand the truth about Trump's health! Demand the release of the unredacted Epstein Files!

      Delete
    2. You assume that Trump is undiagnosed. You don't know his Montreal test scores, except for what he has told you, that and his doctors who have him running a marathon routinely in the morning. They are all likely to be lying.

      Delete
    3. I said he was diagnosed with the info suppressed, not undiagnosed.

      Delete
    4. Sorry, misread 1st sentence last paragraph. Agree with your opinion. The media glossed over his first Montreal cognitive testing during an unscheduled trip to Walter Reed on a Saturday, during his first term. The events triggering that trip are unknown and absent a satisfactory explanation the press should have concluded it was due to a significant cognitive event. This is the kind of situation that contrary to his physician's statement at the time was not routine. They, the press, all too readily accepted the official statement about it, as well as Trump's declaration that he passed it with flying colors. The downward slope of his trajectory now is anybody's guess, but seems rather steep to me.

      Delete
  4. "Still coming: The New York Times pretends to profile one of Gutfeld's willing enablers"

    Congrats to Somerby on his upcoming Times profile!

    ReplyDelete
  5. I am so glad the American people are getting a good look at what elderly dementia is actually like via Trump's public appearances. Otherwise they might go on thinking Biden's normal aging is the face of dementia when it is what a healty old man is like.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Trump just does the same speech over and over, without understanding either the audience or the context. He spouts the same gobbledygook with the generals and foreign leaders as he does with his cult. His cult and cult-adjacents don't care; everyone else is bewildered.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Good point, Ilya, about Trump giving the same, rambling speech regardless of audience. But, there's nothing insane about doing that, because it works.

      However IMO opinion, the bewildered people are mostly people who didn't listen to the speech. Maybe they heard a snippet or they heard someone else's summary. People who listen to the speech know what he's saying.

      Delete
    2. What are the salient points that we missed in his ramblings to the generals? I listened to enough of it to grasp that it was a meandering bit of nonsense. It's like grampa Simpson talking.

      Delete
    3. He pointed out that they should suck each other's cocks more.

      Delete
    4. There are two kinds of people. Those (normal) who know what Trump is saying and love it, and those who know what Trump is saying, pretend they don’t, and hate it.

      Delete
    5. What about the part part where Trump mentioned Oscar Pistorius and the different types of moisturizers?

      Delete
    6. 7:41 what about when Trump said "Russia, if you're listening, I hope you're able to find the 30,000 emails that are missing."?

      People still think that was some kind of joke on Trump's part and not a serious request. They conveniently bury the fact that Russia hacked less than 6 hours later. Jerk

      Delete
    7. After his speech, Hegseth explained that he wasn't being perjorative when he went after the fat generals. He had their better interests in mind. It's easier to cheat on your wife with a normal BMI. The exception, of course being president canckles.

      Delete
    8. Trump's polling manager gave campaign data to anti-trans Russian spies connected to Epstein.

      Delete
    9. As someone once said: there are two kinds of people -- those who think that there are two kinds of people and those who don't.

      Delete
    10. And it was at this exact time that a large fanny-burp was released from the bottom at near record speed, causing the cheeks to flap violently.

      This was witnessed by several bystanders in the room.

      Delete
    11. Ilya, I'll never stop loving President Trump.

      Delete
    12. What's not to love about old, orange, and ignorant?

      Delete
    13. I meant to say President Biden. I'll never stop loving President Biden.

      Delete
    14. David in Cal,
      I listen to Trump's speeches, just like the mainstream media does.
      The difference is I don't work for the mainstream media, so I'm allowed to openly point out that Trump is a gigantic racist, and so are his voters.
      How about you?

      Delete
    15. Biden knew that Americans were clamoring to have leaders whose children made millions from foreign governments while they were serving in the government. He saw this and capitalized on it due to his acumen.

      Delete
    16. Biden's acumen levels never tapered off like those of other men his age.

      Delete
    17. Biden knew that ordinary Americans wanted their military leaders to wear women's clothes while on the job.

      Delete
    18. Orange Chickenshit calls military heroes "suckers".
      Maggot trolls here are emotionally stunted punks with the maturity of a 1st grader.
      Go fuck yourself, maggot.

      Delete
    19. Biden was merely transitioning military personnel into women.

      Delete
  7. Democrats have self-destructed.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Get back with us after the mid terms. Democrats= Republicans= roughly 30% each. Independents poll very negatively for Trump, by a 2:1 margin. Donnie's fat ass is going to sink a lot of republicans, especially since polls show that they're under water regarding most national policy issues.

      Delete
    2. Spectacularly.

      Delete
  8. That's it. Your advice is numbing my brain.

    ReplyDelete
  9. >fannyburp=2{fanny+burp}//`|66273|~54[smell_bad|\\[audible]+{cheek_flap}= ahhhhhhhhhhhh

    ReplyDelete
  10. Republicans are all child rapists who are jealous of the size of Hunter Biden's cock.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. They're racist child rapists who are jealous of the size of middle-aged grifting nepo babies penises.

      Delete
    2. Republicans are racist child rapists who are in bed with Putin and really jealous of the penis size of grifting nepo babies in their late forties.

      Delete
    3. Republicans rape babies while internally seething about the penis size of middle-aged drug addicts. So they're conflicted.

      Delete

  11. Harvard hires drag queen named ‘LaWhore Vagistan’ as visiting professor.

    True story.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Any time a drag queen protects a child from a Right-winger's sexual predation, the Right throws a hissy fit.
      Truest story.

      Delete
  12. Poor Somerby.
    He'd love to write about the liberal media, but there isn't one. So he's stuck writing about Mike and the NY Times.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Every fucking day, the Orange Abomination does something crazy. Every fucking day. We cannot endure this for 3 1/2 more years.

    Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac are permanently closing their offices in New York, a decision reportedly made by the Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA) in response to what it calls the "corrupt and dangerous business practices" of New York Attorney General Letitia James. While the companies will eliminate their physical presence, they will continue to employ New York residents and offer mortgage loans in the state.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Stop acting like a fag.

      Delete
    2. As soon as you stop licking Orange Chickenshit's ass.

      Delete
  14. I get over $25k a month working part time. I kept hearing other people tell me how much money they can make online so I decided to look into it. Well, it was all true and has totally changed my life...This is what I do, check it out by Visiting

    Following Link open here → W­­­­­w­­­­­w­­­­­.P­­­­­a­­­­­y­­­­­c­­­­­a­­­­­s­­­­­h­­­­­1.s­­­­­i­­­­­t­­­­­e

    ReplyDelete