WHAT IS MENTAL ILLNESS: The Democrats are the party of Satan!

FRIDAY, OCTOBER 3, 2025

So he now has said: Go ahead and ask:

Has mental illness been playing a role in the events of this week?

We're speaking here of severe mental illness—mental illness of the serious kind. Has some such form of severe mental illness been involved in the week's events? 

If so, it's as we've been telling you for a very long time. You won't read about it in the New York Times, where they've been telling you this:

Nothing to look at! Just move along! Nothing to look at here!

You won't read about possible "mental illness" in the New York Times. To receive your intimations about that possible part of the realm, you have to journey to Mediaite, where the most prominent report, this very morning, appears beneath this astonishing headline:

Trump Deems Democrats ‘The Party of Hate, Evil, and Satan’

Yes, that's what the headline says! And yes, that's what the sitting president has now directly said.

Below, we'll give you the link to that latest Truth Social post. But the news report at Mediaite does include this text:

Trump Deems Democrats ‘The Party of Hate, Evil, and Satan’

President Donald Trump deemed Democrats the party of “Satan” on Thursday amid the ongoing shutdown of the federal government.

[...]

On Thursday night, the president went on a mini-posting spree on his Truth Social platform, during which he falsely claimed that he had presided over “record Black employment.”

Perhaps the most notable post, however, was a collage of prominent Democrats, including Schumer, Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY), and former President Joe Biden.

“The Party of Hate, Evil, and Satan,” text on the image read. “The Democratic Party is Dead! They have no leadership! no message! no hope! their only message for America is to hate Trump!”

There's a bit more to the report. But to see that astonishing Truth Social post, you can just click here.

With that post, the world has changed. Unless we're determined to hide our eyes, the whole world is different now.

Full disclosure! You won't be reading about that post at the New York Times—or you won't be reading about it much. For better or worse, the Times has been whistling past that societal graveyard for a good long time by now.

For better or worse, Times personnel have kept averting their gaze from what has been right there before them. It is that refusal (or that inability) to see and report what's there in the world to which Lawrence O'Donnell referred last night.

He did so right at the start of his most recent diatribe. You can see the opening monologue from last evening's Last Word program at the program's site. 

Once again, O'Donnell went where the "madness" meets the road. If you click to the Last Word site, these are the headlines which summarize the monologue you'll be seeing:

Lawrence: We are clearly seeing madness pouring from the darkness of Donald Trump's mind
MSNBC’s Lawrence O’Donnell explains how Donald Trump posting racist fake videos while refusing to negotiate with Democrats to end the shutdown reveals how Trump’s “madness … has reached new extremes that we haven't seen before even from Donald Trump.”

That's the summary at the Last Word site. Last evening, at 10 o'clock sharp, here's the way O'Donnell  started:

O'DONNELL (10/2/25): Well, the New York Times is lost. 

The New York Times is still the greatest newspaper in America by far, and one of the greatest newspapers in the world. But tonight, the New York Times is lost.

The New York Times has no idea how to cover the madness of Donald Trump. And so the New York Times ignores it, just as the madness of King George the Third had to be ignored by the London Times in 1789.

So said O'Donnell, at the start of a monologue in which he went on to trash the Times for its inability, or for its refusal, to cover the presidents "madness." They simply don't know how to do it, Lawrence essentially said.

At this site, we've been floating these points of concern for a very long time. We first cited the 1994 feature film, The Madness of King George, at least as far back as April 30, 2019

We went there again at the start of this year as we considered the unusual behavior of the president as he started his second and perhaps final term.

At this point, full disclosure:

"Madness" is a colloquial term. It isn't part of clinical diagnostic language. 

Last night, O'Donnell was making an obvious claim. Plainly, he was saying that some form of serious mental illness is involved in what the president has been doing of late—and if you watch his entire monologue, please consider this:

He hadn't seen the president's new Truth Social post at that point in time! He hadn't seen that remarkable post when he continued along from there, saying that the New York Times—and the entire Washington press corps—doesn't have the slightest idea how to cover this "madness."

Again, "madness" isn't a medical term. We also remind you of this:

Any form of severe "mental illness" (the term "mental disorder is now said to be widely preferred) starts as an obvious personal tragedy—as a tragic loss of human potential and capability.

The person gripped by the "mental illness" didn't ask to be so afflicted. For example, he didn't ask to be born to a sociopath, if that's part of the tragic roll of the dice which brought his status low.

That said:

In the case of a major political figure, the presence of some such severe disorder is also a danger for the world. As he continued, O'Donnell gave his due to the greatness of the New York Times—he wouldn't know how to do better, he said—but he also mocked the way the editorial board of that paper analyzed the situation we're in with respect to government shutdown.

O'Donnell isn't a medical specialist. In that sense, much that he said last night took him out over his skis once again. That said:

It seems to us, as it does to O'Donnell, that the president's ongoing behavior—the behavior reported at Mediaite—raises an obvious question about that possible medical tragedy, and about the concurrent danger to the world.

Fullest of full discourses:

At a time of intense tribal division, there is no chance—no chance at all—that you will be able to get the president's tribe to agree on a claim like the claim being made by O'Donnell. 

Also, there's no way to establish the ultimate truth concerning what O'Donnell has said. Meanwhile, though, and once again:

The Party of Hate, Evil, and Satan!

Remarkably, that's the accusation which screams out from the presdident's latest post. People like Vance and Cruz, and Gutfeld and Watters, will find ways to laugh it all off. 

In fairness, Gutfeld and Watters get paid to perform that service. So does the endlessly uncomplaining Dana Perino.

In his monologue, O'Donnell described the way the New York Times keeps averting its gaze from the situation at hand. Once again, a bit of disclosure:

Mental illness—"mental disorder"—is a complex, challenging concept. Physical illness is quite straightforward. So-called mental illness is hard.

What does it even mean if we say that the president may be so afflicted in some serious way? That isn't an easy question to answer—and the mainstream press, from the New York Times on down, has sworn a blood oath, an oath it has kept:

Such questions must never be asked!

Such questions must never be asked! So the press has aggressively said.

At this site, we've shown you, many times, what the president's niece said about her uncle's mental health in her best-selling 2020 book, Too Much and Never Enough. We won't go there again today, but this is the way Simon & Schuster fashioned its author line:

MARY L. TRUMP, PH.D.

The author line was designed to stress the author's academic knowledge, along with her experience as a clinical psychologist. As she listed her uncle's impressive collection of apparent "psychopathologies," she said he might well be a "sociopath," though she made the point that "sociopath" isn't a technical term either.

Colloquially, a sociopath is often thought of as someone who lacks empathy. Stating the obvious, we all lack empathy to some degree—but according to medical science, some people lack that capacity much more than the typical person does.

Nicholas Kristof is off in the world showing what empathy looks like. Kristof appeared on last evening's Last Word. He's showing us what empathy looks like as children are dying around the world from Elon Musk's termination of USAID.

Such empathy itself is now dead to the world. There will be no room for any such archaic feelings until the current tribal war has somehow been resolved.

Are we currently dealing with some sort of mental illness? We'd like to see (carefully selected) medical specialists answer carefully crafted questions about that very topic!

At the New York Times and around the dial, the press has agreed that that must never happen--and it may be just as well that they've done so.  The woods are lovely dark and deep, but even here in our own self-impressed Blue America, our intellectual shortcomings go on and on and on.

They wouldn't know what questions to ask. They wouldn't know how to care, how to think or feel.

At present, we're all faced with the need to come to terms with the various things the sitting president is now saying and doing. We advise you to pity the child, then to proceed from there.

What does it mean when the sitting president keeps saying things, on Truth Social, like the statement he issued last night?

Vice President Vance will be willing to say that it's nothing but a good, funny joke. Watters and Gutfeld will keep snapping their towels—and by the way, their furiously angry tribe has almost surely already won. (We Blues largely earned our way out.)

Dana Perino won't say a word as other women get trashed as "livestock." Senator Cruz (Harvard Law School) will continue placing those sombreros on every Democrat's head!

Democrats are the party of Satan! That's what the afflicted has said!

Lawrence got over his skis once again. Having said that, we'll also say this:

On balance, we'd have to say that Lawrence's aim has been true.

Atop the front page of today's print editions: Atop the front page of the New York Times:

Voters Believe U.S. Can’t Heal Deep Divisions
 Poll Shows a Shift Even Before the Shutdown

 

76 comments:

  1. Somerby doubles down on Trump being insane but once again Somerby has no words to spare about what we should DO about the president's illness.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. If you want a WHAT-TO-DO, don't ask Jeffries or Schumer.

      Delete
    2. Don’t ask our elected party leaders, right!

      Delete
    3. They don't know what to do. dork.

      Delete
    4. Visit Digby’s blog. Resistance instructions & links there every day. Somerby has never done that.

      Delete
  2. Don't worry, Antifa forces are mobilizing with an attack planned for Oct. 18.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Demonstrations and protests may feel like attacks to rightwing snowflakes but they are peaceful, non-violent lawful expressions of free speech.

      Delete
  3. Americans clamor to be led by men in dresses.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. If It's Not Scottish, It's Crap!

      Delete
    2. Old enough to remember when bald men in dresses who stole luggage were appointed to sensitive nuclear positions by Biden and a trannie was appointed HHS director.

      Delete
    3. Not nostalgic for righty lies. Have you seen the video of JD Vance circulated by Newsom? Cutie pie.

      Delete
    4. 12:30 Don't tell me eye shadow is shagging the couch again.

      Delete
    5. Judges and clerics wear dresses.

      Delete
    6. JD Vance wears a dress.

      Delete
  4. Those of us on the left knew Trump was crazy back in 2015. We worked to elect Democratic party alternatives. Somerby thought it was more fun to talk about Hillary being an awful candidate, how she shouldn't have called Trump supporters deplorable, how it might be possible that some of the complaints about her launched by Republicans might be true, if we just listened to The Other.

    Then Somerby argued against the two impeachments of Trump, because after all the people elected him so why should he be held accountable for misdeeds. Then when Biden ran, Somerby could find no enthusiasm for supporting him, even though he won and became the new people's choice. Then Somerby was against prosecuting Trump because he was out of office and so what if he had a bunch of classified documents in his bathrooms at Mar a Lago.

    When Trump ran again, Somerby was all "Biden is too old," agreeing with the nonstop crusade against Biden launched by the NY Times and George Clooney. Then Somerby couldn't find a nice thing to say about Harris, except she had a nice smile. And she didn't talk about the border enough to suit Somerby, who had no good words to say about Biden's accomplishments either. And when Trump won again, Somerby blamed "blue America" and refused to talk about Epstein or anything else Trump was doing wrong from Day 1 in office.

    Today still avoids talking about Trump's many crazy acts but instead focuses only on Mary Trump and her bitter book about how mean Trump was to her daddy. There have been so many mistakes and oddities since Jan 20, but Somerby refuses to discuss them. He only wants to talk about the press, and then only about cable news, not the variety of views appearing in alternative media (becoming mainstream as podcasts and substack essays are the new source of news for increasing numbers of people).

    Somerby blew it back in 2015 and he has still not caught up with where we blues are now. He is the last guy who should be lecturing us about resistance to Trump. That is the only path left to us, given that there are no Republicans with the courage to call for Trump to come clean about his health. There are Republicans asking for release of the Epstein Files, but Somerby ignores that effort entirely, closing ranks to protect Trump, as Somerby has been doing since 2015. I wonder if Somerby will call Virginia Guiffre a con artist and blackmailer, the way he did Stormy Daniels? Time will tell.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hillary's problem was that she married into it. She was only there because she had been married to Bill Clinton. And people generally don't want to be led by women anyway.

      Delete
    2. Quaker in a BasementOctober 3, 2025 at 11:32 AM

      "And people generally don't want to be led by women anyway."

      "People," Nonny Moose? Which people?

      Delete
    3. Men with big trucks and small dicks. Prove me wrong.

      Delete
    4. Most people don't want to be led by women. People meaning human beings.

      Delete
    5. People prefer to be led by men at the national level. I hope this is obvious to you.

      Delete
    6. First of all, this blog is a media critique blog, which is why Bob talks about the NY Times being silent in regards to Trump's outlandish behavior.
      Secondly, impeachment is a political game, and it's perfectly valid to criticize the first impeachment as being somewhat thin gruel. The second impeachment is where GOP senators should've found a pair and done the right thing for themselves and everyone else.

      Delete
    7. I know, but if a country like ours could get into a war with Russia or a country in the Middle East, people don't want some hysterical, cackling bitch to be in charge. That's the last thing people want.

      Delete
    8. Hillary was never hysterical.

      Delete
    9. You sound more hysterical than Hillary, and Trump definitely sounds hysterical. Looks like a double standard to me.

      Delete
    10. People prefer to be led by men. It's the way human beings are wired.

      Delete
    11. Generally strongly agree with you Ilya but the first impeachment was a critical failure. The felon was breaking the law by withholding desperately needed weaponry - weapons that Congress had determined be sent to help defend Ukraine from Putin's evil invasion - until Zelensky manufactured dirt on Biden working with idiot Rudy and his Russian spy handlers. Allowing spending laws to be bypassed by the felon for illegal gain, has led to the demented monster, Musk, and Project 2025 assholes to steal Congressionally allocated funding on the daily. It paved the way for the end of the American Democratic system..

      Delete
    12. Democrats will almost certainly win the house in 2026 and they can impeach Trump again then.

      Delete
    13. Fair elections in 2026?, ha! That ain't how asshole fascists roll. (See 1/6 for reference). Prove me wrong.

      Delete
    14. I agree that Trump's machination vis-a-vis Ukraine were an impeachable offense -- but marginally so. They did not quite have the political support, I don't think. Every time you strike out at the beast and miss, you only add to its perception of invincibility.

      Delete
    15. And in that case, information about the Biden family's scumbaggery and money grubbing grifting in Ukraine and other countries was more or less accurately related to the constituencies of his political opponents and other non-Digby readers which made Trump look less deserving of impeachment than he would to Digby readers who were fed spin about the Bidens or had the topic hidden from them entirely.

      Delete
  5. Speaking of mental illness, back in my day blowing a tranny was an automotive issue.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Back in my day blowing a tranny got my engine running in overdrive.

      Delete
  6. We are being ruled by morons because white people are clueless racist assholes.

    "Ron Filipkowski - Trumpnomics: Get tariff money from US consumers on Chinese goods. Our farmers can’t sell their products because the Chinese refuse to pay our tariffs. China buys from farmers in Argentina instead. We send Argentina $20 billion. Then we pay our farmers to throw their crops away."

    Hey one of you dumb ass righties, Prove Ron Wrong! The fucking moron President had to bail out farmers with our tax dollars last time around because he and his policies are consistently so fucking stupid. Prove me wrong.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Trump tried to play nice. He is finally doing what Democrats feared and Republicans hoped he would do in 2016. It's about time.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yes we all want the deep state to imprison political enemies. Prove me wrong, you nasty ass moron.

      Delete
  8. Quaker in a BasementOctober 3, 2025 at 11:51 AM

    Remember when folks called Kamala a big ol' liar for saying Project 2025 was a blueprint for Trump's agenda?

    NEW YORK (AP) — President Donald Trump is openly embracing the conservative blueprint he desperately tried to distance himself from during the 2024 campaign, as one of its architects works to use the government shutdown to accelerate his goals of slashing the size of the federal workforce and punishing Democratic states.

    In a post on his Truth Social site Thursday morning, Trump announced he would be meeting with his budget chief, “Russ Vought, he of PROJECT 2025 Fame, to determine which of the many Democrat Agencies, most of which are a political SCAM, he recommends to be cut, and whether or not those cuts will be temporary or permanent.”

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I do not remember that, no.

      Delete
    2. @12:06, repeat these words: man, woman, camera…

      Delete
    3. Okay. Man woman camera.

      Delete
    4. Failed. 1:05 is certainly in the beginning stages of dementia. Prove me wrong.

      Delete

    5. "...he desperately tried to distance himself..."
      "Desperately"? This word is not factual It's media bias.

      Delete
    6. You are such a fucking bullshitter, DiC. You yourself, right here in the comments on this blog multiple times called Kamala a liar for accusing Trump would be implementing Project 2025. MSNBC has been running a video showing numerous times the fat lying sack of shit stood in front of his marks, assholes like you, and denied having any knowledge of Project 2025. Yes, before the election he was DESPERATELY trying to distance himself from PROJECT 2025, you fucking fascist freak.

      Delete
    7. The Don desperately waddled to the toilet after crapping his diaper.

      Delete
  9. I get over $25k a month working part time. I kept hearing other people tell me how much money they can make online so I decided to look into it. Well, it was all true and has totally changed my life...This is what I do, check it out by Visiting

    Following Link open here → W­­­­­w­­­­­w­­­­­.P­­­­­a­­­­­y­­­­­c­­­­­a­­­­­s­­­­­h­­­­­1.s­­­­­i­­­­­t­­­­­e

    ReplyDelete
  10. The best leaders are men. It’s not so much the penis as the Y chromosome.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Watching Hicseth and the fat orange demented felon drool on stage for two hours in front of all the brass all I got to say is what da fuck dude?

      Delete
    2. Can you reason? The best leaders are men does not imply all men are good leaders.

      Delete
    3. Yes it does. Prove me wrong.

      Delete
    4. Another example: the best basketball players are men does not imply all men are good basketball players.

      Delete
    5. Another example, history has shown orange men are the worst leaders, but they think they are the best as they age to 80, and full blown dementia is on display, greatest worst leader than has ever been seen before in all of history, as told to me by three very large men with tears in their eyes.

      Delete
    6. But they didn’t call you “sir”, so your story doesn’t count.

      Delete
  11. If we go explore the annals of 20th and 21st century dictators -- or even going further back -- will we not find that demonizing their opponents was a standard tactic. "The are evil" seems to be a standard trope of the dictatorial discourse. I am not sure that Trump's outlandish and vitriolic screeching portends of a mental illness.
    It is possible that advancing dementia makes Trump discard all guardrails of the normal political discourse.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yes, the are evil.

      Delete
    2. Ilya - demonizing opponents is as old as the human race. A technique used by fascists, communists, democrats, liberals, conservatives, do-gooders and everyone in between. Your post is a self-referential example.

      Delete
    3. One blessed group does not demonize enemies: actuaries.

      Delete
    4. Well, David, maybe you can point to me where any other president -- a Democrat or a Republican -- referred to the other party as being satanic. It's not that Trump is demonizing an individual, which would be bad enough, it's that he's demonizing some amorphous group of "leftists".

      Delete
    5. David in Cal is a demonic ex Jew. Prove me wrong.

      Delete
    6. You can tell he is a demon from the horns on his bald head.

      Delete
  12. “SPLC is the targeting wing of the Democrat party.

    Soros is the financial wing of the Democrat party.

    Antifa is the military wing of the Democrat party.

    Legacy Media is the propaganda wing of the Democrat party.”

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Taylor Swift is taller than you.

      Delete
  13. You do know what Antifa stands for, right David? Back when I was a kid everybody was Antifa. Now you fascist assholes reject it. Prove me wrong, you fascist POS.

    ReplyDelete
  14. Dems focus on symbols like Greta's flotilla. Trump focuses on real things, like actually ending the war in Gaza.

    Trump gives Hamas Sunday 6 p.m. deadline to accept his peace plan or face ‘all HELL’

    https://www.politico.com/news/2025/10/03/trump-gives-hamas-sunday-6p-m-deadline-to-accept-his-peace-plan-00592887

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yes David, making demands has all the makings of another Trump "deal". As always, ETTD. Why do you hate anti fascists you fascist prick. Prove me wrong.

      Delete
    2. Color me jaded, but I think the part about "or all hell breaks loose" is the main plank of the peace deal. Jaggoff.

      Delete
    3. @1:57 - reality will prove you right or prove you wrong. Next week we will learn whether Trump's peace effort succeeded.

      Delete
    4. You have been bragging about Trump's awesome peace deal for, check notes, nine fucking months. Shut up already. Moron.

      Delete
    5. Trump's efforts are not peace efforts. Again, your predicate is wrong, David.

      Delete
    6. Trump's guide to idiot negotiations: do this or I smash in two weeks, maybe. Nothing left to smash in Gaza, just kill 'em all genocide is left, right David?

      Delete
    7. Trump has publicly admitted this is a real estate transaction.

      Delete
    8. Exactly, QiB. Trump views everything as a real-estate transaction, hence buying Greenland or Canada.

      Delete
  15. Secretary of State Rubio says he met his wife at a flamboyant gay bar. Prove me wrong.

    ReplyDelete