THE DISAPPEARED: What happens on the Gutfeld! program?

FRIDAY, NOVEMBER 14, 2025

And why does it get disappeared? A highly unusual thing takes place near the end of Amanda Hess's profile of the Gutfeld! show's Kat Timpf.

Timpf is one of two regular panelists on the Fox News Channel program. (The other regular panelist is a former professional "wrestler" named Tyrus who now performs as a comedian.) 

Hess's lengthy profile of Timpf appeared in print editions of the New York Times on Sunday, September 28. The profile appeared at a deeply challenging time in its subject's life. 

By most sane people's accounts, Timpf had dealt with these challenges quite bravely. Headline included, the profile starts as shown:

A Baby. A Double Mastectomy. Many Opinions From Fox News Viewers.

Inside Kat Timpf’s office at Fox News headquarters, her husband was holding the baby. “I have a little bit of drool on me, but it wasn’t there when I got here, I swear,” Ms. Timpf apologized as she settled behind her desk. Her husband, Cameron Friscia (he’s a consultant and combat veteran, they met on Raya), had swung by the office for a visit with their 5-month-old son. He laid the boy in his stroller and gently maneuvered him past the congratulations-slash-sympathy gifts piled on Ms. Timpf’s office floor. The father took the baby home. The mother got back to work.

“I’ve been through a lot, but I’m also still kind of going through it,” Ms. Timpf said. “Like, ‘I still don’t have nipples’ is probably the best way to describe it.”

Ms. Timpf is a co-host of “Gutfeld!,” Fox News’s spin on the late-night comedy show, which regularly draws more viewers than Jimmy Kimmel, Jimmy Fallon or Stephen Colbert (though it airs earlier than those shows, at 10 p.m.). This has made Ms. Timpf the most watched woman in late-night television at a time when the late-night stage has become unexpectedly politically charged.

It has also made her an object of audience members’ fascination, concern, judgment and, occasionally, their madness. The spotlight has only intensified in the past year—the year that Ms. Timpf turned 36, got pregnant, was diagnosed with breast cancer, gave birth, had a double mastectomy, underwent reconstructive breast surgery and talked about it on “Gutfeld!,” a show named for its host, Greg Gutfeld.

As seems to be required by tribal law, Hess offered a misleading account of when the Gutfeld! program airs. The program does air at 10 p.m., but that is only true in the Eastern time zone.

Even at 10 p.m., Gutfeld! isn't a "late night" show. But it airs at 9 p.m. in the Central time zone and at 7 p.m. on the west coast. In east coast cities, at 10 p.m., Gutfeld! is a primetime show. 

Out on the coast, the program goes on the air before traditional "prime time" has even started!

To appearance, the modern journalist is required to refer to Gutfeld! as a "late night" program. This allows the modern journalist to reinforce the Fox News Channel's marketing claim, according to which Greg Gutfeld, the program's host, is described as "The King of Late Night."

For whatever reason, Hess and her editors chose to further this branding scam as this profile started. But it was only as the profile continued that readers began to get a hint of what a TV viewer will hear if he or she decides to watch this "cable news" program.

Late in the profile, Hess finally gives her own account of what some such viewer will hear. But early on, as the profile continues, Times readers receive a first glimpse:

(Continuing directly)
Mr. Gutfeld’s style mixes anti-liberal insult comedy with relentless punchlines about women’s bodies—their age, their weight, their sexual attractiveness. Each night, Ms. Timpf sits at his right-hand side, playfully challenging him while staking out an alternate style of physical humor—one that centers her own experience inhabiting a woman’s body.

I met Ms. Timpf on a Tuesday morning in August, on her second day back at “Gutfeld!” after a reconstructive surgery in which the tissue expanders inserted behind her chest muscle during the mastectomy she underwent in March were replaced with permanent breast implants.

[...]

The night before, Ms. Timpf had made her return to “Gutfeld!” just as the backlash to the backlash to Sydney Sweeney’s campaign for American Eagle jeans was fomenting on the right. A former heavyweight pro wrestler known as Tyrus offered his take on Ms. Sweeney’s female critics: “They look like a bag of oatmeal and they’re ugly and mean,” he said. But Ms. Timpf spied an opening for a disarming joke, one that turned the controversy back on herself. “I was watching it on the couch,” she said of the ad. “And I thought: Should I have gone bigger?”

Even there, in paragraphs 5-8, Hess begins to describe the peculiar contents of this ugly "cable news" program. For whatever reason, its Adonis-like 61-year-old host "mixes anti-liberal insult comedy with relentless punchlines about women’s bodies—their age, their weight, their sexual attractiveness," Hess correctly reports.

Nor is this ugly personal style confined to the program's host. At the end of that passage, in paragraph 8, Hess quotes the former professional "wrestler" as he offered his own thoughts about the physical appearance of a group of female observers.

“They look like a bag of oatmeal and they’re ugly," the former professional "wrestler" thoughtfully said. What those critics actually said wasn't being examined. Instead, viewers were allowed to enjoy an insult about the way these women allegedly looked. 

(Until recently, the former "wrestler" has routinely been described as weighing 375 pounds.)

This started to give Hess's readers a tiny hint of what they can expect to hear if they watch this weeknight programa show which boasts the third highest viewership numbers in all of "cable news."

At this point, we'll offer an additional criticism of what Hess has written. In paragraph 5, she gives the impressionin our view, the false impressionthat Timpf makes a habit of "challenging" the program's host when he makes his insulting remarks about the (alleged) physical appearance of the various women who disagree with his own perfect views.

We've been watching the Gutfeld! program for years. In our experience, any such challenges by Timpf, playful or otherwise, are few and quite far between. 

In all honesty, we don't think we've ever seen Timpf pose any such challenge to these endless insults. Her reluctance to do so is directly acknowledged later in Hess's admiring profilebut we're almost at the end of the lengthy piece when Hess describes what she saw, and what she heard, when she sat in the studio audience on August 6 and watched a taping of that evening's program.

What did Hess see that night? As she nears the end of her report, she offers this description:

Gutfeld!” styles itself as a late-night comedy show, but it is also the finale of Fox’s daily news reportinga place where the network’s subtext can become text. When I attended a taping last month, I sat in the back row of the studio audience and looked down upon a circle of tufted armchairs arranged around a central coffee table...

Mr. Gutfeld perches in the center of Fox’s psychic den, a waggish variation on the sitcom patriarch. Ms. Timpf sits at his side, taking the role of the quirky sibling. “He always laughs like an older brother would when the little sister makes fun of him,” Tom O’Connor, the show’s executive producer, said. When I asked Ms. Timpf if she saw herself as Mr. Gutfeld’s little sister, she reminded me that, at 61, Mr. Gutfeld is 25 years older than she is.

At the top of the show, Mr. Gutfeld delivered a battery of topical jokes in which he matched pieces of the day’s news with verdicts on liberal women’s bodies. Hillary Clinton is ugly. Joy Behar is old. Nancy Pelosi is old. Rosie O’Donnell is fat, Whoopi Goldberg is fat, Lizzo is fat, a professor of political science you’ve never heard of is fat. As Mr. Gutfeld delivered yet another rant about the left-wing reaction to Ms. Sweeney’s ad, Ms. Timpf calmly waited her turn, then sarcastically congratulated Mr. Gutfeld for managing to call not just one, but multiple women fat. “What a segment,” she said.

“Greg chooses the topics,” Ms. Timpf told me. “When I host, the topics are different.” ...

Just for the record, Timpf almost never hosts. 

In that passage, you're looking at paragraphs 26-29 of a lengthy profile which includes 37 paragraphs in all. In paragraph 29, we're told what Hess saw as she sat in the studio audience that night.

She saw the program's 61-year-old host perform his standard array of insults aimed at an array of liberal or progressive women, all of whom were fat fat fat and maybe ugly—just too f*cking fat.

The sheer stupidity of this behavior will possibly seem, to some observers, to be matched by its undisguised ugliness. For some reason, Hess chose to describe the author of this poison as "waggish," as if he's really just the harmless "prankster" described in the headline of this earlier profile by Colby Hall, the otherwise insightful director of the Mediaite news site.

To Hess, he's waggish—to Hall, he's a prankster. Meanwhile, riddle us this:

To what extent, and with how much fervor, did Timpf "sarcastically challenge" the program's host for his tsunami of insults this night? Indeed, to what extent did she "challenge" Greg Gutfeld at all?

To what extent did she "challenge" Gutfeld? Thanks to the invaluable Internet Archive, you can judge that for yourself:

Greg Gutfeld was on vacation on the night of Monday, August 4the night of Timpf's return to the Gutfeld! show. Still, if you want to watch that program in its entirely, you can start by clicking here.

The program Hess attended was the program of Wednesday, August 6. To see the program's waggish host denounce all those women for being so fat, you need to watch the start of the show. 

You can do that by clicking this. The reference to Joy Behar as "an old bag" arrives at 10:01.

To watch other such denunciations, you should click here for a later segment. As you will see, Tyrus and the poisonous Julie Banderas join Gutfeld in ridiculing that very fat female professor, who is judged to be much less attractive than Sweeney, a young movie star. 

Timpf's alleged challenge"What a segment," she does in fact saycomes in response to all that.

Timpf has responded bravely to her recent medical challenge. That said, we watched the August 6 show in real time, and we're not sure we actually thought she was "challenging" Gutfeld at all.

On the whole, we'll extend (minor) kudos to Hess for giving readers some idea of what actually takes place, on a nightly basis, on this strange "cable news" programOther journalists who have profiled Gutfeld or the Gutfeld! show have almost wholly refused to describe the program's actual contents.

We're sorry to say that we'd include the New York Times' David Marchese in that group. We refer to his new interview / profile of Gutfeld, a piece which will appear in the New York Times Magazine in Sunday's print editions.

Hess was willing to give Times readers some idea of the relentless contents of this heavily watched TV show. Even there, she failed to describe the full-blown "misogyny" which some observers have claimed to see as they've described this show.

That M-word does appear one time in Hess's lengthy profile. It appears in paragraph 23, in a statement by Nick Marx, "an academic who studies the conservative comedy scene."

Next week, as we consider the throwback gender politics of much of the MAGA world, we'll look at that fleeting remark by Marx. Also, we'll look at other profiles of Gutfeld, Marchese's included, whose authors have worked quite hard to avoid reporting what actually happens on this peculiar show.

Some will see this program as poisonous. Others will watch the show and think what they're seeing is highly insightful and that it's all being done in good fun.

However a person may come down on such matters, at least two things are quite obvious:

The Gutfeld! show departs in the most obvious ways from standard journalistic practices of the past many years. Also, major journalists at major Blue American orgs seem determined to avoid reporting what actually happens on this increasingly popular program.

They almost seem to be deferring to Fox and to "The King of Late Night!" But why in the world would these journalistic superstars be inclined to do something like that?

In our view, Hess's profile barely scratches the surface of the atavistic loathing of women which drives the Gutfeld! program. Newspapers like the New York Times seem quite reluctant to report what happens on the Gutfeld! show, or on other Fox News Channel programs like, for example, The Five.

Our questions, therefore, would be these:

Does Blue America have a sexual politics in any real way at all? Even if in the slightest way, does Blue America actually care?

Next week: Rosie O'Donnell's gynecologist. Also, has Hunter Biden started [BLEEP]ing his stepmother yet? 


214 comments:


  1. "What happens on the Gutfeld! program?"

    Never watched it, but I think I know (thanks to you, Bob): he makes fun of you BlueAnons, you are watching it, and you get terribly upset.

    And then you write a long essay about Gutfeld being super-horrible for making fun of you BlueAnons.

    Am I right or am I right?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. That's it, trumptard. No Bitcoin bubble bath for you tonight.

      Delete
    2. You are wrong, prove me right.

      Delete
    3. Stop wasting our time.

      Delete
  2. Democrats defended Clinton thirty years ago. Therefore Trump is innocent.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies

    1. Clinton's raping a bunch of women was perfectly okay. Therefore Trump is guilty.

      Delete
    2. Clinton’s accusers claims were investigated and found to be not credible (lies) but that doesn’t stop the right repeating them.

      Delete
    3. Triggered, Hillary?

      Delete
  3. Not helping you out here, Anonymouse 11:53am. Those pre-written essays on Clinton will have to keep.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Keep them. Trump is innocent.

      Delete
    2. As a general statement, that's just not true.

      Delete
    3. Trump said he wished he could rape his own daughter on Stern's show. Prove me wrong.

      Delete
  4. Somerby says he has watched Gutfeld for years. Why?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Demented. Perverted.

      Delete
    2. he digs fat lady jokes

      Delete
    3. That part seems obvious. If it bothered him, he wouldn't keep watching once he figured out what the show was about.

      Delete
    4. This comment has been removed by the author.

      Delete
    5. Anonymouse 12:30pm, Somerby critiques the media. Gutfeld has two shows on FNC. It wouldn’t be hard to run into him, any more than it was hard to run into Maddow or Chris Matthews back in the day when they were on nightly shows and also joining panels on special coverage events.

      Delete
    6. This is in no way an explanation of why Somerby continues to watch Gutfeld after criticizing his content, as you insist he did today.

      Delete
    7. Given that reasoning, why are you here reading TDH and criticizing everything Bob writes about? Dr. Quack, heal thyself.

      Delete
    8. If Somerby could identify the Republican voter who isn't a bigot, he would have done it by now.

      Delete
  5. Timpf would be braver without the reconstruction surgery. Then she could experience what it feels like to be mocked for a body she did nothing to deserve.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Republican men do this to keep women subservient. Timpf is subservient to Gutfeld. What is surprising about that to Somerby. Is he wanting to suggest that Gutfeld does this because women let him, so it is women’s fault. As Somerby notes, Timpf doesn’t run the show. Yes, it is sexist. Now what? Connect the dots Somerby. Men are the Republican base and they are working on pushing women back to trad-wife roles. That’s what Gutfeld is about.

    Incels think attacking women’s self esteem by denigrating appearance will make women insecure enough to date pieces of shit. It also makes men feel better to kick down at women.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. But it works! My best pickup line is “You’re fat and ugly.”

      Delete
    2. It doesn’t work — that’s why these guys are incels.

      Delete
    3. "Is he (Somerby) wanting to suggest that Gutfeld does this because women let him, so it is women’s fault. As Somerby notes, Timpf doesn’t run the show."

      Maybe not, but is she forced to be on the show. Bob is reminding us she's a media whore.

      Delete
    4. Emphasis on whore, I guess. Women can be sexist too, but women are not responsible for men’s behavior. What Gutfeld is doing benefits men and patriarchy not Timpf. At least she is working. How many male comedians or whatever appear on Gutfeld and Fox compared to women? If she changes venue as Nicolle Wallace did, Somerby will call her other names, like sellout or fake.

      Delete
    5. Anonymouse 1:38pm, someone should relay this “reasoning” to Ghislaine Maxwell.

      Delete
    6. Maxwell has spent her life using men's proclivities against them. That isn't very admirable. And she is a criminal, another sociopath without an ounce of empathy for anyone, especially not the victims of their sex trafficking. If Somerby cared, he might write about her damaged childhood and call her a lost girl. The lesser tendency for women to participate in this kind of crime is why Maxwell was effective at recruiting young girls, who trusted her during the phase when she was luring them into slavery. She was good at telling them what they needed to hear and flattering them and making promises, just like male pedophiles are when grooming a child.

      Somerby seems to think that all women, by virtue of being female, must be feminists. Feminists are working to improve conditions for all women, but there is a wide variety of beliefs and attitudes held by women. That doesn't mean we cannot change the system to be more equitable for both sexes and eliminate the injustices of the patriarchy (a system created to benefit men at women's expense). Maxwell exerted control over her life by being a criminal. So does Trump and so did Epstein. They all hurt people and showed no regard for their victims.

      Cecelia, you think you are cute when you say mean-spirited stuff like this, but you are showing no respect for the suffering of 13 year olds raped by much older men, for money that the girls did not receive but went to Epstein, as their pimp. There is nothing liberated about that, nothing good for the girls involved. That you think their suffering is just another chip in some political game you play here as a troll, makes you a pretty cold bitch.

      Delete
    7. Anonymouse 4:12pm, what I said is pointed, not mean-spirited. You’ve let Timpf off the hook for getting highly paid to hear misogynistic cracks and insults, and you do that SOLELY because you know Bob was making a point about her over that.

      Go ahead and argue that “Women can be sexist too, but women are not responsible for men’s behavior. What Gutfeld is doing benefits men and patriarchy not Timpf.”

      It directly benefits Timpf, you putz. Just as Maxwell aided and abetted Epstein for a variety of selfish reasons. .

      Delete
    8. See my comment to you at 5:14.

      Delete
    9. We don’t call each other bitches here.

      Delete
    10. Just putz? Do you know what a putz is?

      Delete
    11. "If she changes venue as Nicolle Wallace did, Somerby will call her other names, like sellout or fake."

      Just guessin' here but did you just reach into your ass and pull that comment out? Because it is not in any way consistent with anything Somerby has ever said.

      Delete
    12. 5:35 - a putz is a schmuck.

      Delete
    13. No, putz is Yiddish for penis.

      Delete
    14. Somerby has frequently criticized Wallace for switching to MSNBC after working at Fox. He thinks she changed her political views to go with her new job. Wallace has herself said that she remains a Republican, so Somerby's complaint is specious. But that didn't stop him from trashing her from time to time.

      Delete
    15. 9:11 - Do you know what the Yiddish word schmuck means?

      Delete
    16. Anonymouse 9:13pm, MSNBC hired Wallace due to her political background, having worked for Senator McCain, and because she became critical of the GOP. Along the way, she became just as smarmy and pandering to her specific audience as the other talking heads. That’s the beef.

      Delete
  7. Anonymouse 12:45pm, how should it feel to Amanda Hess?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. It should feel like two nipples.

      Delete
    2. Anonymouse 12:48pm, or three.

      Delete
    3. Why can’t you put your comments under the thread you are responding to, like others do?

      Delete
    4. Once you lower your integrity to be a man pretending to be a woman, you can do all sorts of dumb things, and feel pride about it.

      Delete
    5. Anonymouse 1:33pm, you sound like the voice of experience. I’m sure most of us have suspected that about you.

      Delete
    6. Yes, she is that, 1:33 is. She is also pretending to be a bridge player, and Tesla owner. I guess those are the dumb things she is talking about.

      Delete
    7. In fairness, 1:33 is a different person.

      Delete
    8. Cecelia, keep working on your timestamp skills. You’ll get there.

      Delete
  8. A panelist people call Kat
    Helps Gutfeld mock those who are fat
    Now, why is Bob surly?
    She comes on too early.
    Now, what is the problem with that?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Higgledy Piggledy- liberal women
      ~ Greg Gutfeld

      Delete
    2. Or learn meter.

      Delete
    3. You found my ego, @1:32. The meter of this limerick is correct.

      Delete
    4. Yesterday’s was off.

      Delete
    5. David is "off" everyday.

      Delete
    6. There once was troll named David in Cal.
      He couldn't differentiate Neo-Nazis, white supremacists or fine people on the Right from each other.
      But that's okay, because no one can.

      Delete
  9. It's more disturbing how FOX News made up stories about Portland being a war zone. That came by the way of their news department. Portland should sue FOX.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Trump calls for DOJ probe into other Epstein ties, including Clinton

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6kGUQFMUWnM

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. But not his own ties? He doesn't want those investigated?

      Delete
    2. Republicans are deeply out of touch, Dems do not care if Clinton is implicated in the Epstein files; Dems are not in a cult, unlike Repubs.

      Delete
    3. LOL, I can see King Orange Satan's flop sweat from my desk.

      Delete
    4. Quaker in a BasementNovember 14, 2025 at 2:00 PM

      Another gambit to avoid releasing the files as he promised during his campaign.

      Delete
    5. I must agree with you, Quaker. I do not know why Trump hasn't released all these files.

      Delete
    6. David, I think you know why, Trump raped children. Pretty simple isn't it?

      Delete
    7. @2:33 - But, why did Joe Biden keep all Trump's child alleged rapes secret when he had full access to the Epstein files for four years?

      Delete
    8. Every rightwing accusation is a confession.
      Go fuck yourself, Dickhead in Cal.

      Delete

    9. It might have something to with the fact that late Mr. Epstein, aside from being a socialite and large Democrat contributor, was also a Mossad agent.

      How appropriate would it be, to publish the full dossier, of a foreign agent of this sort? I don't know, but at the very least it seems likely that it might make Mossad extremely unhappy.

      Delete
    10. Speculation that Epstein may have been a Mossad agent is not evidence or proof. He had the same right to contribute to a political party as anyone else. Don't forget that Trump was also a Democrat during his friendship with Epstein. His career in Republican politics seems to have begun with his money-laundering for Russian oligarchs. Epstein (as stated in his emails) seems to have given Russia leverage over Trump by detailing his activities with young girls and his financial crimes to Lavrov and others. Maybe that was part of Epstein's work with Mossad, or maybe he was more entrepreneurial and independent of them. It is clear there is a lot of shady stuff to explore and that Trump was and still is entirely unfit to be president.

      Delete
    11. David keeps asking the same question about Biden without listening to anyone's answers. Biden personally did not read the Epstein files. Epstein died before Biden became president. The DOJ had the files and they used them to prosecute and convict Ghislaine Maxwell, Epstein's surviving partner. Merrick Garland was in charge and he was very slow in prosecuting Trump for his more obvious crimes, much less his participation in sex trafficking. The others named in the files would be more difficult to prosecute because with rich, famous, powerful people you need more proof. I would expect Garland to direct his prosecution and investigation toward currently active crimes, including Trump's ongoing possession of classified material he shouldn't have taken with him, and Trump's participation in 1/6 and the fake elector scheme, and his other corruption, as was done. Trump was convicted and should not have been elected again, if Republican voters had any respect for the law.

      Delete
    12. Of course Trump is trying to implicate Clinton -- that is classic deflection. But there is an email among the Epstein documents just released by the House Oversight Committee where Epstein explicitly states that Clinton never visited his island. Hard to prosecute Clinton when Epstein himself said he never did anything with young girls. Of course, Trump cannot read, so it is no surprise he isn't aware of what is in those newly released emails from Epstein's estate. The same materials are part of the overall files in Trump's DOJ's possession though.

      Delete
    13. But having consensual sex with a 23 y.o. intern is the same as raping a fourteen y.o., dontcha know.

      Delete
    14. Hey Dickhead, Biden tried to play nice. Trump as you love to brag, is a fucking immoral ass.

      Delete
    15. At the time, 50% of the people polled said that a blowjob was not "having sex". That may be why the public didn't get as upset about Clinton's fling with Monica as the partisans on the right wanted them to. Gore's refusal to forgive Clinton, his prudishness, contributed to his lose to Gore. His prudishness was also reflected in his war against rock-n-roll led by his ultra-religious wife Tipper. Gore misjudged the reaction of voters to these trivial, humanizing flaws in Clinton and lost young people's votes by picking on their music (with an emphasis on hip-hop that was transparently racist).

      Delete
    16. correction: his loss to Bush

      Delete
    17. I don't know if anyone is accusing Trump of "child rape"; I certainly didn't expect that things like that would emerge. These emails are mostly embarrassing. They demonstrate how little regard Epstein had for Trump and his business "acumen".
      Here was a man who was Trump's best friend -- to the extent that Trump and Epstein are capable of having friends -- and he laid out bare what he thought about Trump. It does appear that Epstein knew him quite well. You know what they say: birds of a feather....
      Trump is mostly upset -- horrified? -- that his close association with Epstein will come to the forefront.

      Delete
    18. @4:13 - the difference is that Clinton's sex with a 23 y.o. intern is confirmed.

      Delete
    19. It’s confirmed that Clinton did something that’s not a crime.

      Delete
    20. Clinton got impeached for lying about a consensual relationship with an adult. The Epstein files can be judged to have more damaging goods on this administration than they do on Democrats, or Trump would have had Bondi release them, and Johnson would not be stalling on the vote. The circumstances of Epstein's death and the injuries sustained to his neck make it highly unlikely that he committed suicide. Likewise 9 hours of interviews with Maxwell by Trump's personal lawyer, followed by her special treatment by the DoJ make it highly likely that a deal was cut there to ensure that damaging facts were not disclosed by her. Only a brain-dead MAGAt would think otherwise.

      Delete

    21. 23 y.o. must be some other women Bill Clinton raped. Lewinsky was 22.

      Delete
  11. The man who shot at Trump in Butler PA was a disgruntled right winger according to Tucker Carlson:

    “ Before Carlson even gets to the timeline, he spends several minutes reframing who Thomas Crooks actually was — and here, his case is surprisingly strong. Drawing from Crooks’ online comments, saved posts, and archived forum activity, Carlson argues that the 20-year-old wasn’t a covert leftist or an Antifa radical, but a deeply alienated young man steeped in hard-right conspiratorial culture.

    He points to Crooks’ repeated praise for fringe-right influencers, his fixation on “Deep State traitors,” and posts describing Trump as “the only one fighting for us,” a pattern Carlson says directly contradicts the early media framing that Crooks was politically “unclear” though he does cite evidence that, for reasons unknown, Crooks apparently turned against Trump.

    Whatever else remains murky about the rooftop in Butler, Carlson insists Crooks’ digital footprint shows a classic right-wing grievance spiral, not a partisan mystery. And that, in Carlson’s telling, only makes the FBI’s rush to downplay motive more suspicious.”. [Rawstory]

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. We do not know if Crooks was shooting at Trump, Trump got hit by some glass or plastic shrapnel.

      All the other notable cases of violence against prominent right wingers, including Kirk, involve White male right wing gun enthusiasts.

      The FBI says that 75% of political violence comes from the right, only about 4% comes from the left.

      Delete
    2. Rawstory is Soros-bot-style idiotic bullshit.

      What Tucker Carlson was saying (or hinting, rather) is that Crooks was, perhaps, a patsy, brainwashed and recruited by Autopen's FBI.

      Delete
    3. 2:26 You a smart one what with all your idiotic bullshit, hints, patsies, brainwashing, autopen's, and FBI all in two fucking sentences. Stay afraid, it's veery scary out there! Fucking nutjob.

      Delete
    4. Take it up with Tucker Carlson, Fucking Nutjob.

      Delete
    5. Nope, tired of assholes like you and Fucker.

      Delete
    6. Don't you have a safe space to crawl in, dear lady?

      Delete
    7. The one thing most remarkable about these shooters and would be shooter is how little has come forth about them. That now famous photo of Trump up after the shot, fist pumped, seems really bizarre. What secret service agents would allow him to become the target of an active shooter? Very strange.

      Delete
    8. It’s not strange. Real life is not a movie scene.

      https://www.politico.com/video/2024/07/13/trump-injured-after-shooting-at-pennsylvania-rally-1363421

      Delete
    9. It’s not strange, but you can't convince a BlueAnon.

      Delete
    10. What would be strange is a Republican voter who had a problem with child rape.
      Fortunately, there is no such thing to worry about.

      Delete
  12. The fanboy trolls trying to cope with their dear leader being a sexual predator creep that partied with one of the worst child abusers in history, should make us sad for their condition.

    It is sad.

    But it is also very satisfying.

    ReplyDelete
  13. This is worth reading: Kate Manne, Unshrinking: How to face fatphobia, 2024. Somerby might read it and learn more about both Gutfeld and how women can realistically combat sexism.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Lose some attitude?

      Delete
    2. Anonymouse 3:43pm, I’m not the one trying to school a guy who is currently devoting a blog to misogynistic behavior, even as you bemoan his subject matter.

      Delete
    3. Somerby is not calling out misogynistic behavior. He is repeating Gutfeld's jokes and advancing the demeaning talk about women's weight etc. If Somerby were calling out misogynistic behavior he would talk about why that behavior is wrong and how it affects women in our society, and perhaps explain why Gutfeld keeps doing this stuff. Somerby tut-tuts and repeats Gutfeld's offenses, compounding the damage and telling his readers where to go to hear men attack women verbally.

      Your reveal yourself with your own choice of words. You say: "I’m not the one trying to school a guy who is currently devoting a blog to misogynistic behavior..." You are correct that Somerby is devoting his blog to misogynistic behavior, just as Gutfeld devotes his show to such behavior. They are both attacking women, Gutfeld directly and Somerby by borrowing and repeating Gutfeld's words.

      There are other examples of women helping men to hurt other women. There are even women who abuse children. Somerby uses the term "sexual politics" (whose meaning he does not understand) to attack women for not stopping Gutfeld from being an ass toward women. Somerby hasn't got a clue what sexual politics means.

      sexual politics definition -- "the principles determining the relationship of the sexes; relations between the sexes regarded in terms of power"

      Women do not have the power to stop guys like Gutfeld from doing what they do on TV. Women do not have a relationship with Gutfeld either. So what are women supposed to be doing, in Somerby's estimation? He apparently thinks Timpf should stand up and call Gutfeld a name, storm off and foreit her job. At which point Gutfeld will laugh and call her an ugly name or talk about that time of the month, and the show will go on as usual. Because the show is aimed at men, has a predominantly male audience, is run by men and most of the guests and hosts (comedians) are men. That is the sexual politics of the show.

      All women who live with men and work with men make compromises in order to survive and meet their own needs and goals. The kinds of compromises are individual and personal, but we all make them. We all decide what we will give up, what we will tolerate, what we can and cannot do. Feminists are working to change the system so that the compromises women make are more equitable, less harmful and allow women to achieve more with less sacrifice. Women, especially feminists, understand that not all women want to challenge a system and that some are able to manipulate men and the system to get what they want. Others consider that a challenge to their honest and integrity and choose other methods to work within a system where men need not give up the same things to succeed and be happy.

      Somerby has some caricature of women, a bunch of hostility, and very little sympathy for women. He says outrageous things, offensive things about the struggles of women, when he notices at all. For example, his harsh remark that women shouldn't drink at frat parties if they don't want to be raped, shows no understand of such issues and implies that women should be willing to forego what men routinely enjoy (parties, drinking, fun) to protect themselves from physical assault. Somerby really needs to read some feminist writing and Kate Manne's books are a good place to start.

      I don't bemoan Gutfeld's show. I don't watch it. He is no worse than many sources of objectification and denigration of women in our culture. If you were to read Manne's book about fatphobia, you might realize the straightjacket women wear with respect to their appearance, every day of their lives. That you don't understand this, is yet another reason why I suspect you are not female but a man pretending to be female for some reason of your own. Many women pretend to be men on the internet because of the abuse they routinely attract when commenting. Male privilege is showing when a man decides to comment as a woman online.

      Delete
    4. Anonymouse 5:14pm, I suspect that you are a female and that's too bad, because you’ve written a book here of nothing that advances any goal beyond “disagree with Bob”. To the point where you’ve turned grown women into complete naïfs. We have the ironic figure of you slinging arrows at a blogger bemoaning the treatment of women on a show that wins its time slot. We have you calling me a man, even as you defend poor defenseless women who… just have to tolerate…misogynistic potshots.. We have you reacting to Bob’s interest in Gutfeld’s highly rated insult fest of liberal women via your chiding of him for his subject matter. You are a woman, but you are not a feminist. You’re an apparatchik and you are not very bright.

      Delete
    5. Naïf is masculine. Naïve is feminine.

      Delete
    6. Sounds like a non-denial denial to me.

      Somerby dislikes women. His writing would be very different if he didn’t. For one thing, he attacks Hess and Timpf, both women, for not attacking Gutfeld. Then he attacks blue America, as if we were putting Gutfeld on the air. And you don’t notice his actual targets.

      Delete
    7. Anonymouse 5:54om, even you aren’t that stupid. First of all, I’m fairly certain that there are few liberal men in the world. When Bob argues that media liberals should be sounding an alarm as to Gutfeld!, he’s not just talking to women. He’s appealing to media members and also to the people and the party that you frequently assert are the only people and party that cares about misogyny. Not so much on your end, huh?

      Delete
    8. "he attacks Hess and Timpf, both women, for not attacking Gutfeld."

      As he should.

      Delete
    9. Even Gutfeld has 1st amendment rights. Feminists want to educate people so they won’t laugh at his jokes, not infringe on his freedom. As with sexism and racism, and other bigotry, education combats misogyny. You really should read more.

      Delete
    10. Anonymouse 6:22pm, please… Youre bemoaning having to read Bob’s complaints about Gutfeld!.How are you going educate anyone if you won’t speak up?

      Delete
    11. I’m a liberal man, and I like women, including Cecelia.

      Delete
    12. Anonymouse 6:45pm, well…do know that I’m more discriminating than you.

      Delete
    13. Anonymouse 10:37pm, I dissed myself, Einstein.

      Delete
    14. You’re no Einstein.

      Delete
    15. Anonymouse 6:42am, and you’re no sage. More like crabgrass.

      Delete
    16. More like crab lice.

      Delete
    17. Patience ladies.
      Eventually, some kid raised by Republicans will shoot Gutfeld to death.

      Delete
    18. The joke will be on Gutfeld when he gets to the afterlife and finds out that God is a fat woman.

      Delete
  14. Amanda Marcotte points out that GOP women are 14% of the Republican caucus but 75% of the Republican signers of the discharge petition. Women care about what Trump and Epstein did to girls.

    ReplyDelete
  15. Kate Manne says this about Trump's self-incrimination over his sexual abuse of women and girls:

    "We failed to listen to Trump, when he told us exactly what he was capable of.

    Witness Trump’s appearance on the Howard Stern show, in 2006. Stern asked Trump if he could “be banging 24-year-olds,” as a man then pushing sixty, to which Trump replied, “Oh, absolutely” without any hesitation. “Would you do it?,” Stern persisted. “I’d have no problem,” Trump responded. Stern’s co-host, Robin Quivers, then asked Trump if he had an age limit for sex. “No, I have no age...” Trump seemingly caught and corrected himself: his age limit was twelve, he subsequently offered. “I don’t want to be like Congressman Foley, with, you know, 12-year-olds.” (Congressman Mark Foley resigned after he was found to have exchanged sexually explicit messages with underage congressional pages. But, contrary to Trump’s implication, the lower age limit for such pages is sixteen, not any younger.)

    Trump’s remarks were, unlike Katie’s, fairly widely publicized in the run-up to the 2016 election, especially when the notorious 2005 hot mic footage with Billy Bush surfaced and went viral. A reminder of what Trump said to Bush in it: “I’m automatically attracted to beautiful—I just start kissing [women]. It’s like a magnet. Just kiss. I don’t even wait. And when you’re a star, they let you do it. You can do anything. Grab ‘em by the pussy. You can do anything.”

    And that is Trump in his own words: a sexual assailant who would draw the line only at the age of twelve, not thirteen—which he allegedly knew Katie was.

    (Trump may or may not have been true to his word: “Maria,” the girl who was allegedly sexually abused alongside Katie, was only twelve at the time of the maid fantasy transpiring according to Katie’s sworn affidavit (as “Jane Doe”).)

    Trump allegedly knew Katie was thirteen because Epstein’s handler, Tiffany Doe, had told Trump that she was the same age as Trump’s then-thirteen-year-old daughter, Ivanka. This was touted as a feature, not a bug, since Trump’s sexual attraction to his own daughter was part of Katie’s appeal: he allegedly thought Katie looked just like Ivanka, and Tiffany put Katie in a blonde wig to heighten the resemblance. Trump’s remarks about his own daughter are not a matter of mere surmising: he said it himself, again on the Howard Stern show. “By the way, your daughter...” Stern began, in 2004. “She’s beautiful,” said Trump, finishing Stern’s sentence. “Can I say this? A piece of ass,” Stern offered. “Yeah,” said Trump, blasé about the blatant objectification. Two years later, Trump responded to Stern’s speculation that Ivanka had had breast implants by denying it thus: “She’s actually always been very voluptuous. She’s tall, she’s almost 6 feet tall and she’s been, she’s an amazing beauty.” Trump also called Ivanka “hot” when she was just 16, in 1997, to then-Miss Universe, Brook Antoinette Mahealani Lee: “Don’t you think my daughter’s hot? She’s hot, right?” This was during the Miss Teen USA pageant. In a 2006 appearance on The View, Trump famously went further: “If Ivanka weren’t my daughter, perhaps I’d be dating her.” (“Isn’t that terrible? How terrible? Is that terrible?” he rambled.) Trump later said he was only joking. In light of the forgoing, this claim strains credulity.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Cont.

      "What all of this suggests, philosophically, is that we don’t just dismiss the words of the powerless when they testify to what happened. (And in fact, we’re often prepared to believe women, among others, when they offer convenient testimony or convey gender-congruent knowledge.) We also dismiss the words of the powerful as mere “locker room talk” or just empty bluster when they tell on themselves, and threaten to frustrate their own interests. We protect them, and defend them, even from themselves, plausibly due to a mechanism I have long called himpathy—the sympathy and forgiveness we show toward powerful, privileged men in many of their misdeeds. What is going on here is hence partly a demonstration of the power of wishful thinking: when we gain evidence of the misdeeds of people we would rather believe in, we decline to believe inconvenient truths. We even dismiss or forget their own testimony."

      Delete
  16. “ Does Blue America have a sexual politics in any real way at all? Even if in the slightest way, does Blue America actually care?”

    Does this sentance make any sense at all given the actual definition of sexual politics?

    Democrats are the only party that takes women’s issues seriously and that runs femal candidates at all levels, including for president. Women recognize this and support Democrats over Republicans by double digits (20% over men for younger voters).

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Somerby is trying to goad the left into calling for canceling Gutfeld but no one is biting.

      Delete
    2. I'll bite. Cancel Gutfeld. I feel much better.

      Delete
    3. Anonymouse 5:32pm, so that narrows it down to anonymices having no interest in liberal women being nightly excoriated on a popular tv show, unless they’re quoting Pres.Trump or misquoting Bob.

      Delete
    4. Anonymousec6:14pm, or start by leaning on Fox News,

      Delete
    5. What are you talking about?

      Delete
    6. Time to put down the box wine ,Cecelia.

      Delete
    7. My reply is at 6:14 pm. Gutfeld! doesn't need to be canceled. With a bit of pressure, Fox will bring Greg under control.

      Delete
    8. Ceceliexlax always dishing it out but can never take it.

      Delete
    9. Anonymouse 1:40pm, we’ll, here you are considering opposition and conflict as being a tantrum. Buy a mirror.

      Delete
    10. Don't sell offering thoughts and prayers short.
      Since I started to offer them to Right-wingers crying about how life is so unfair to them, I've never felt better.

      Delete
  17. Trump, in a post early this morning:

    “I will be asking A.G. Pam Bondi, and the Department of Justice, together with our great patriots at the FBI, to investigate Jeffrey Epstein’s involvement and relationship with Bill Clinton, Larry Summers, Reid Hoffman, J.P. Morgan, Chase…”.

    After Pam Blondi dutifully announced the opening of an investigation, Trump was asked about the investigation and said, in a breathtaking display of addled deceit tinged with senility:

    “I’m allowed to do it, I don’t want to do it, I’m not doing it, I had nothing to do with it. That choice for example came from Pam Bondi and the DOJ.”

    Can't keep his own lies straight even for one day. When will the 25th Amendment be invoked?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Good, good. Idiot-Democrats started it, politicizing Epstein, their best friend and major supporter.

      So now they should taste their own medicine.

      Delete
    2. Can always count on you to miss the point of a post, trumptard.

      Delete
    3. Triggered, Hillary?

      Delete
    4. The Washington Post has reported Epstein was texting Congressional Democrats talking points in real time during major hearings. Epstein was literally feeding Congressional Democrats questions to ask about Trump during these hearings. Epstein, a convicted sex offender, was controlling Democrats and what they asked in major Congressional hearings.

      In other words, Democrats and the left, lose again. They are natural born losers. It's all they do. Lose to Trump. They've been going after Trump for raping children with Epstein and like everything the Democrats always do, it's blown up in their face and they are left holding the loser bag. Now they have lost on Epstein and Trump. Which was predictable because that's all they do is lose. Lose and lose and lose and lose and lose again.

      Delete
    5. Have some chamomile tea, Hillary.

      Delete
    6. Drowning in your own flopsweat, 10:53?

      Delete
    7. No, Hillary, but thanks for asking. You're such a sweet old lady.

      Delete
    8. The polling on the fat bastard who attempted an autogolpe then pardoned all the crooks he incited to riot as well as his autogolpe planners and defenders, gloriously sinks in the polls. First for Epstein, then for saying Americans suck at doing hard work. He ought to know. His businesses hires many hundreds of foreigners to save money on paying lazy ass useless white American kids who can only suck off mom and dads teat.

      Delete
    9. Triggered, Hillary?

      Delete
    10. America is triggered by the douchebags Boris.

      Delete
    11. You poor thing. So sensitive. Like a snowflake.
      Quickly, crawl into your safe space and hide, Hillary.

      Delete
    12. Good advice, Hillary.

      Delete
    13. Democrats were being live coached by Epstein in the middle of a live Congressional hearing about Trump.

      Serial rapist Epstein was texting them incriminating questions about Trump and belittling comments about the interior of their mouths.

      Delete
    14. Democrats were colluding with serial child rapist Jeffrey Epstein during Congressional hearings.

      Delete
    15. That’s much worse than raping children.

      Delete
    16. A congress member texted Epstein during testimony by Cohen. How is that “colluding”?

      Delete
    17. It's a serial child rapist and a Democratic party public official covertly coordinating strategy during a formal government proceeding.

      Most Americans prefer the questions their Congress people ask not be ghost written by the architect of a mass pedo child rape ring.

      Democrats let child rapist Jeffrey Epstein dictate their strategy during high profile hearings about President Trump.

      Delete
    18. Some people are wondering why Democrats were in bed with Epstein.

      Delete
    19. Epstein knew Trump and Cohen, so he had info. That doesn’t make him a strategist or part of the Dem team, or in bed. He sounds like an informant.

      Delete
    20. The Democratic party is perfectly fine texting convicted child rapists for ideas about what to ask witnesses during hearings.

      Delete
    21. Jeffrey Epstein was the ringleader of a child sex rape ring that farmed out dozens and dozens of underage rape victims to powerful men, including president Trump. Years after he was convicted though, the Democratic party solicited help from him with questions intended to damage President Trump, who he had raped children with on various planes and Islands.

      So some people seem to be wondering: are the Democrats themselves a part of this pedo rape ring? Why would they entertain a relationship with a serial child rapist who supplied underage victims to rich and powerful men like Donald Trump, Satan Mccheeseburger? The Democratic party must also be involved in this child sex trafficking rape ring.

      Delete
    22. 1:20 Nice try. You're not capable of deflecting as much as is necessary here. They're burning MAGA hats. Why don't you toss yours in the fire like a solid citizen? When Pam Bondi let Epstein off the hook in Florida do you think that was her idea? The bitch has been in the service of Donald Trump for as long as she's held office. MTG knows her constituents.By the time this has played out, she will be wearing Trump's late night rants against her like a badge. Your ship is sinking, but in this case the rats are the last to abandon it. Are you going to go all in and declare fifteen year olds fair game? It may be your last resort. Pitiful.

      Delete
    23. Epstein was texting a Democrat with incriminating information when they were grilling Cohen? And your point is what? That they were colluding with Epstein? For what purpose? To incriminate Trump in wrongdoing? So Epstein knew enough about the matters they were grilling Cohen on, and at that point disliked Trump enough to feed damaging information about him to his adversaries. And now where is Epstein?

      Delete
    24. I agree with you that most political parties would follow the Democrats lead and seek out convicted child rapists for ideas.

      Delete
    25. The email releases have revealed the Democratic party's secret, working relationship with a convicted orchestrator of a mass pedophilic rape ring. What are the chances then, that Democrats themselves are participating in child rape?

      Delete
    26. Trump visited Epstein's rape Island 26 times.

      Delete
    27. The number of Right-wingers who have a problem with children being raped remains steady at zero.

      Delete
    28. "Most Americans prefer the questions their Congress people ask not be ghost written by the architect of a mass pedo child rape ring."

      In trying to catch any kind of criminal, law enforcement often has to rely on questions/info from other criminals.

      Grow up.

      Delete
    29. Democrats were doing the bidding of convicted rapist Jeffrey Epstein who was directly texting Democrats during a hearing

      If this were a Republican, the media would report on this nonstop.

      Delete
    30. The Democratic party was being controlled by convicted serial pedo rapist Jeffrey Epstein. He was directing what Democrats asked in hearings.

      What did Democrats know about the rape rings, and when did they know it?

      Delete
    31. Release the files.

      Delete
    32. Release the files of Democratic party advisor and convicted child rapist, Jeffrey Epstein. He was raping children with Donald Trump. That has been conclusively proved.

      Delete
    33. So silly 10:33, the Democratic party is and has always been controlled by Soros.

      Delete
    34. Epstein was a Democratic donor, but so was Trump before 2010, contributing to Clinton and even Kamala Harris in 2014. Epstein stopped making political donations to Democrats in 2004 when he was first investigated for sex trafficking.

      Delete
    35. 'the Democratic party is and has always been controlled by Soros."

      Down to the most obscure commenter on the most obscure blog. Soros' control is ruthless and total. I can't even wipe my ass without George's okay.

      Delete
  18. The AI-generated video at this link is worth watching.

    https://digbysblog.net/2025/11/15/brilliant-2/

    ReplyDelete
  19. Where’s Bob? He usually works Saturdays.

    ReplyDelete
  20. And then, over the surreal plasma horizon arose a gargantuan fanny. I immediately shielded my eyes as a show of respect.

    However, had I known what was to unfold next, I would have shielded my ears and my nose.

    As I opened my eyes to reassess the situation, the giant cheeks flapped relentlessly and the loudest roar was heard, followed soon thereafter by a hurricane-force gust of foul-odor wind, nearly blowing me out of my shoes and singing my nose hairs in a most dramatic fashion.

    ReplyDelete
  21. Epstein was a major sponsor of the Democrat party.

    As for pedophilia, Democrats don't believe it's a crime. NAMBLA pedos are part of the Democrat LGBTQ+ constituency. And it's their major, their most active constituency.

    In the same way as with Clinton's raping (there's no other word for it) his own intern, 30-years his younger, and right at his desk, at his workplace, -- to the Democrats it's all about "consent"; nothing else matters.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Release the files.

      Delete
    2. 7:19 You are one frightened puppy over what is in those files.

      Delete
    3. Certainly prominent Democrats were raping children along with Trump. We want all of the sick fucks locked up. Who gives a fuck what party they represent? Jesus you people are awful.

      Delete
    4. 23 year old adult Monica put it differently, she said she wanted some Clinton consensual cock. You know, the opposite of raping a child. And if Clinton raped children like Donnie, they can share a cell. Weirdos.

      Delete
    5. Exactly! Trump and the right wants to make this about Dems vs Republicans, but it is about people who want to see pedophiles and sex traffickers locked up and those who don't.

      Delete
  22. Latest Trump Approval polls:
    Republicans: 90%.
    People not sexually attracted to children: 0%.

    ReplyDelete
  23. ICE operations in Charlotte NC:

    "No sooner had operations begun than CBP was harassing U.S. citizens like Willy Aceituno, 46, for living in the U.S. while brown (Charlotte Observer):

    Willy Aceituno said he’d just left a Charlotte restaurant Saturday morning when federal agents approached him in his pickup, broke a window and stole his keys.

    “Are you an illegal immigrant?” he said an officer asked in the parking lot outside Pollo Campero, near the intersection of South Boulevard and Archdale Drive.

    Aceituno recounted the conversation to a Charlotte Observer journalist at the scene.

    “I don’t have to answer your questions,” he said he replied. “Why don’t you ask other people that? Why just me?”

    Aceituno said he’s originally from Honduras and has been a U.S. citizen for about six years.

    Agents twice stopped him in his pickup within about 10 minutes, he said. Both times he was still in the parking lot, he said.

    A different set of CBP agents smashed his window the second time, dragged Aceituno from his car, detained him for a time then let him go."

    ReplyDelete
  24. From Digby:

    "Andy Borowitz summed up the Epstein files controversy the other day:

    Trump is under the mistaken impression that the Epstein scandal is about Democrats vs Republicans. Actually, it’s about pedophiles vs people who want pedophiles to spend the rest of their lives in prison

    One prominent Republican who want pedophiles jailed and victims receive justice is Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R, Ga.). She indicates that that’s why she’s separating herself from Donald Trump and why he’s branded her a traitor (CNN video) for it.

    MTG wants to see the toxic nature of political dialogue (if one can call it dialogue) dialed back. Borowitz responds, “Of all the heinous things Donald Trump has done, by far the most unforgivable is making me agree with Marjorie Taylor Greene.”

    For as long as I can remember, the Georgia congresswoman has been a reliable firehose of assclownery. Lately, though, I’ve been subjected to the unsettling spectacle of Marge behaving in a sentient manner. It’s like enjoying a new song on Spotify and finding out it’s by Kid Rock."

    ReplyDelete
  25. A bunch of comments trying to link Democrats to Epstein appeared overnight. What better evidence that these are Eastern European trolls than this late night barrage of pro-Trump propaganda?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. As an Eastern European troll, I say “Release the files!”

      Delete
    2. As a conservative Christian Republican, I say “Release the files!”

      Delete
    3. As a sentient observer I say, 'How will we know if, when they say they've released the files, that they've actually released all the files? Do we rely on the inner moral compass of Pam Blondi?

      Delete
    4. Hector - that's one thing I am not worried about. Too many people are involved. If Bondi says she released all the files, but really didn't, others will know. Someone in the Justice Dept will leak.

      Delete
    5. Democrats have lost control of all three branches of government. But with enough help from convicted child rapists, they may turn things around.

      After all, we do know from the released emails that the Democratic party was secretly receiving political advice by text from convicted child rapist Jeffrey Epstein in 2017.

      Delete
    6. Here in Calif, the Dems control all 3 branches. We get uncontrolled wildfires, mediocre schools and highways, poor state services, and out of control crime -- all paid for by taxes that are literally DOUBLE FL or TX.

      Delete
    7. So, why do you live there?

      Delete
    8. Unfortunately for the Democratic party, all the child rapists that used to help them keep mysteriously dying.

      Delete
    9. '"Someone in the Justice Dept will leak."

      Anyone with a spine who has knowledge of the Espstein case has already been separated from the DOJ.

      Delete
    10. David — make Aliyah.

      Delete
    11. Gosh, maybe that's why Kamala lost to Trump!

      Delete
    12. Waiting for David to tell us why he lives in a crappy state like CA, if it is as bad as he claims.

      Delete
  26. I wonder whether the US has withheld similar data about excess deaths.
    [UK] Government ‘withholding data that may link Covid jab to excess deaths’
    UKHSA argued that releasing figures would lead to ‘distress or anger’ of bereaved relatives if connection were discovered

    https://archive.is/xbf3p#selection-2195.4-2199.125

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Trump was in charge of our covid response initially. He supported and encouraged people to get vaccinated. Are you suggesting he made a mistake? Trump just got another covid and flu booster during his last physical exam.

      Delete
    2. Fuck you Dickhead, "The Telegraph is generally regarded as a conservative newspaper, often referred to as the "Torygraph," and has faced criticism for its editorial slant and coverage choices."

      Delete
  27. Today Thom Hartmann offers an excerpt from his book, The Last American President. It is Chapter 2, about Trump's apprenticeship with Roy Cohn:

    https://hartmannreport.com/p/chapter-2-roy-cohns-apprentice

    Hartmann describes Trump's relationship with Cohn and the principles he learned from him, which are now the essence of Trump's approach to business and political life, dealing with other people and addressing accusations against him, things like 1. Never admit error or defeat, never apologize; 2. When attacked, strike back with greater force, 3. Manipulate the media with lies, controversy and spectacle...and so on. We all know Trump's playbook, but until reading this chapter I didn't realize that it came from Cohn.

    Trump admirers believe he created his ruthless strategies for manipulating people, using the press, and doing whatever he wanted without concern for public reaction. But it all comes from Cohn, Trump invented none of it. Trump is enough of a sociopath to learn from Cohn and apply his strategies, but Trump did not create anything that he has used to make himself president, nor is Cohn his only benefactor in seeking power. Cohn introduced Trump to mob bosses and other power men in Manhattan, but it took Russian help to get him elected.

    So, when I hear some breathless Republican talk about how astute Trump has been in gaining the presidency, how ruthless his tactics in dealing with foreign leaders, how effective his use of lawsuits to solve his problems and so on, I now recognize that it was Cohn who taught him that stuff, not Trump who thought it up himself. And that diminishes Trump considerably. He wasn't creative or clever in finding his way into power, he was mentored by other men, whose advice he implemented in his usual clumbsy way. His talent has been surrounding himself with evil men, being their puppet and a figurehead for the wrongdoing of others, while benefiting from his own grifting. Trump didn't invent bitcoin but he prospers from it in grifts he didn't develop. Trump didn't invent Epstein's child sex ring, but Trump benefitted from it. Trump is not the idea man. He is the willing puppet. That is how we can reconcile the enormous harm Trump has done with his unique and massive stupidity, his inability to read, his lack of education and knowledge, and his many business failures and inability to form non-transactional relationships (he has no real friends). When Trump falls, he will fall alone and none of his current "loyal" cronies will defend him. They will save their own skins.

    ReplyDelete
  28. "Does Blue America have a sexual politics in any real way at all? Even if in the slightest way, does Blue America actually care?"

    Sexual politics definition -- "the principles determining the relationship of the sexes; relations between the sexes regarded in terms of power"

    Given that we in blue America have relations and relationships between the sexes, of course we have sexual politics (rules governing them). That is what culture is. These are likely different in Blue America than in Red America. For Somerby to suggest there are no such rules shows that he has no clue what the term sexual politics means.

    Here are some of the differences I see between red and blue America's sexual politics:

    1. Blue America nominally supports the idea of consent between sexual partners in relationships.
    2. Blue America nominally and explicitly (in its Democratic Party Platform) supports the idea of choice as applied not only to health issues but also jobs, education, religious practice, travel, speech, voting, and other exercises of the freedoms men hold and that are written in our Constitution.
    3. Blue American nominally and explicitly supports the right of any American to change sex or adopt whichever sex an individual considers appropriate, and to adopt and engage in the gender-related behavior they wish, regardless of assignment at birth or the wishes of some other party. That is part of sexual politics.
    4. Blue America recognizes that there exist power differentials related to sex that may privilege one sex over the other in their exercise of freedom in pursuing their goals, well-being and happiness, and seeks to make our society more equitable for both sexes.
    5. Blue America generally feels comfortable with the ways men and women work to improve the sexual politics of our culture in order to achieve greater equity and better meet the needs of all people.
    6. Blue America understands that there is an income inequality associated with being female and recognizes the need to address this because women are more likely to live in poverty, earn less for their employment, have fewer assets in retirement (despite living longer than men), and have fewer means of dealing the problems caused by poverty. Blue America sees this as a sexual politics problem not just a financial issue.

    ReplyDelete