SATURDAY: Why were the protesters out in the streets?

SATURDAY, JANUARY 31, 2026

Fox & Friends Weekend explains: Yesterday, on a chilly day, they were at it again.

People were marching in the streets--"thousands," or possibly "tens of thousands." marching in "sub-zero windchills." Why were those citizens out in those streets? This morning, at the start of the 7 o'clock hour, Fox & Friends Weekend explained.

Griff Jenkins posed the question. Rachel Campos-Duffy responded:

JENKINS (1/31/26): You know, I was just having this conversation with Ted, our cameraman, off camera. You wonder, are they really--

Are the protesters in Minneapolis dealing with like the most frigid temperatures for a long time because they are into the issue? Or are they being paid?

CAMPOS-DUFFY: They're probably being paid. And they're a little crazy. You couldn't get me out there for any amount of money, by the way. I hate cold weather.

[LAUGHTER]

On Fox, it's standard messaging. Viewers are constantly told that the others are being paid. For the record, Charlie Hurt had kick-started the rumination by saying this:

HURT: It's like a crazy [UNCLEAR]. The crazier you are, the more you like negative 12 degrees to go outside and scream at people.

[LAUGHTER]

In Hurt's world, the others weren't out there stating a view. They were out there "screaming at people."

Jenkins, Campos-Duffy and Hurt are this program's regular co-hosts. To our eye and to our ear, they seem to be three different people.

Jenkins strikes us as wholly sincere. We'd be inclined to venture different capsules concerning the other two friends.

That said, this messaging is constantly offered to viewers of the Fox News Channel. They're out there marching because they've been paid! In our view, there's no way a large modern nation can hope to function this way.

That's an example of the sifting of message which emerges from Silo Red. That said, over here in Blue America, we're also subject to tribal messaging. Consider a highly unusual comment in Michelle Goldberg's new column:

The Fathomless Resentment of Tucker Carlson

[...]

I’ve been thinking about bad faith a lot since reading “Hated by All the Right People,” Jason Zengerle’s shrewd new biography of Tucker Carlson. In the Trump era, many people have shocked their former friends with their authoritarian transformations, but few more than Carlson...

[...]

Carlson’s journey isn’t unique. JD Vance, his closest political ally, has traveled a similar route, from worrying that Trump could be “America’s Hitler” to serving as his vice president. And just like Carlson, who once praised the Hungarian autocrat Viktor Orban for being “hated by all the right people,” Vance has been fueled by hatred. “I think our people hate the right people,” Vance told The American Conservative in 2021. This psychological reliance on loathing, I suspect, accounts for Carlson and Vance’s similar affect. Neither seems, despite phenomenal success, to be very happy. Instead, they radiate spite and grievance, forever making a show of incredulity about the awfulness of their enemies.

Bad faith, obviously, doesn’t belong only to the right. (Just look at the Democrats who assured us all that Joe Biden was up for a re-election campaign.) But Trump’s Republican Party requires of its adherents an exponentially greater degree of mind-warping rationalization. Occasionally this rationalization becomes insupportable, and people break away from Trump’s movement. More often, it’s just corrosive.

Say what? "Bad faith, obviously, doesn’t belong only to the right?" Is Goldberg allowed to say that?

Goldberg occasionally slips such observations into her columns. She sees the problem as much worse in Red America. But she says that an undisclosed number of unnamed Democrats also engaged in "bad faith" in recent years, in the manner she describes in that parenthetical passage.

(Also, perhaps, when the future replacement candidate was sent out to say that the southern border was shut up tight as a drum? When every sane person in America knew that it actually wasn't, often from watching videotape on the Fox News Channel?)

We did this too, President Lincoln once astoundingly said. Given the madness which often prevails Over There within Silo Red, have those of us in Blue America also helped create our former nation's current devolution / descent? 

Why were the protesters out in the streets? On the tightly messaged Fox & Friends Weekend, there could be only one answer.

Are those of us serviced by Silo Blue capable of understanding our own tribe's role in this astoundingly dangerous game? Does the inability to see the real world in all its fullness also, at times, afflict Us?

Next week: Silo Blue?

85 comments:

  1. Don Lemon and his friends wanted to terrorize a bunch of white people and their children who were worshipping Jesus. Not sure why Don and his pals aren't facing hate crime charges, too. Hope that changes.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Unfortunately for the government, there are first amendment protections for the press.

      Delete

    2. Democrats ain't believe in hate crimes no more, Soros-monkey?

      Delete
    3. Why don't these trolls get English lessons? Or maybe this is just a racist attempt to imitate ebonics. Either way, he sounds like a moron.

      Delete
    4. Triggered, Hillary?

      Delete
    5. Agreed! The church had clearly posted: "Whites Only". Lemon had no business entering a whites only church. Jesus would not have approved.

      Delete
  2. They would be more respectable if they were being paid. As it is they're mental patients filled with hate and rage who are at their street therapy sessions where they can try to hide their severe Cluster B derangement under a pretext of "caring." Not one normal person is fooled.

    ReplyDelete

  3. "In Hurt's world, the others weren't out there stating a view. "

    What "view"? Are you totally dumb, Bob?

    The "view" that the US of A mustn't have any borders, any border-control, and any immigration control? Is this the view being stated out there?

    Well, sure, it's certainly a "view" along the same lines as women trapped inside men's bodies, that buggery is perfectly normal, and that we will all die from good weather 5 years from now.

    Lol. Thanks for the laughs, Bob, and please keep acting funny, like the crazy-BlueAnon you are!


    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. 9:55 is an example of a stupid Trumptard.

      Delete
    2. Triggered, Hillary?

      Delete
    3. Trump would have been defeated by 10+ if Democrats did not turn into the most deranged Portlandia caricatures but with the violence and rage of demonic possession.

      Delete
    4. Nonsense. The people in Portland aren't even like that show -- it is comedy not a documentary. Analyses are showing that vote suppression was the primary reason Harris didn't win. And Russia interfered again on behalf of Trump. Now we are seeing that he was medically unfit to run again and lied to voters about it. The accusations against Biden were a right-wing confession of Trump's own unfitness.

      Delete

    5. Yes, Hillary. That's the ticket!

      Delete
    6. Correct me if I'm wrong, but I didn't see Mao's name in the Epstein Files.
      Why does he come here pretending to be a Republican?

      Delete
    7. All you need to be in the Epstein files is a belief that you are entitled to have whatever kind of sex you want, even with very young girls, and all it takes is money.

      Delete
  4. Thanks to Somerby for the earth shattering report that conservatives think or pretend to think that protesters are paid, an “idea” they came up with years ago.

    Unless of course, you were at the Capitol in J6, or were a tea partier, or the mooks protesting the vote recount in Florida ca 2000, and on and on.

    ReplyDelete
  5. "Say what? "Bad faith, obviously, doesn’t belong only to the right?" Is Goldberg allowed to say that?"

    Goldberg can say whatever she wants, within the limits of libel laws. The question should be is she correct. Somerby doesn't ask that. Why not? Because he agrees with her. Goldberg is repeating Somerby's own mantra.

    Somerby knows the right wing noise machine exists to spread misinformation and propaganda and yet he repeats their messages here day after day. Today, it is that the left is paid or it wouldn't be protesting, and that the left therefore has bad faith when it states its messages. And Somerby says that one of the right's three messengers is in good faith (how can he know that?).

    Meanwhile, a new batch of Epstein documents implicates a whole bunch of men, including Trump and Musk, Howard Lutnick, Bill Gates and an aide to Bill Clinton. Crickets from Somerby. The ICE agents in Minnesota have been given permission to round people up without a specific warrant. Crickets from Somerby on that. Somerby doesn't appear to care about the ICE abuses that are the focus of those protesters, just about the weather report and opinions of three right wing goons on Fox. People will say that he was truly fiddling while our democracy was under attack. I don't know how Somerby can live with himself, while calling himself liberal and doing nothing but furthering Fox misinformation and blaming protesters. For what? Marching in the cold or being paid? Recall that every right wing accusation is a confession. How much are those on the right paid, that they would assume the left must be getting paychecks too?

    ReplyDelete
  6. As usual, the first batch of comments today are very right wing. Being johnny-on-the-spot like that is easier if it is not early morning where you live. Europe is 9 hrs ahead of the US, so it is still working hours there, when Somerby's first post appears. And look how ugly their souls are, revealed in bile as they spew hate at the left. Why do they do it? Are they paid? Somerby doesn't care.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The right-wing hate speech against Democrats is probably all coming from just one guy.

      Delete
  7. If you compare Biden's cognitive functioning with Trump, then obviously Biden was as competent to run for another term as Trump was. This idea that Biden was too old and concealed his age from voters is not supported by facts. It was a campaign ginned up by the right and promoted by the NY Times, aided by Democratic donors who were unenthusiastic about his proposed 38% corporate tax rate, who wanted him off the ticket. Those deep fake videos, promoted by mainstream news, did not make themselves. And Somerby did his little bit to push Biden out of the race, without justification by any doctor's report or poor performance (other than one bad debate). The many people who worked with Biden, foreign leaders who met with him, members of Congress, attested to his sharpness and grasp of the issues. No one says that about Trump, who sleeps through cabinet meetings.

    Somerby had the right to express his opinions and help push Biden off the ticket, then sabotage Harris in her campaign. He does not have the right to come back and claim he is liberal. He clearly is not in good faith when he does that. Nor are his daily essays here anything but distraction from Trump's many failures, his corruption, his bad behavior and his dementia (Somerby won't use that word, even though it is the most descriptive. He is willing to call Trump crazy, because Trump's supporters like him that way. If he were thought to be too old, then those comparisons to Biden would be inevitable.)

    Protesters are willing to march in freezing weather but Somerby can't even praise their courage, won't mention Trump's malfeasance, and is part of the distraction campaign to minimize the Epstein misbehavior. Somerby is betraying his country daily. How much is he paid?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Trump could be severe traumatic brain injured and would be better than the best Democrat.

      Delete
    2. You clearly don't know anyone with traumatic brain injury.

      Delete

    3. As a Democrat, until I hear "America is a Nation that can be defined in a single word: Iwuzindfutmhmafut!"
      I'm not concerned!!

      Delete
    4. Trump will be die this year, and still be the Republican Presidential nominee in 2028.

      Delete
    5. Biden was not up for campaigning and later he was diagnosed with an aggressive form of prostate cancer. In any case, Biden should've bowed out two years earlier and allowed the primary process to play out.

      Trump, of course, has a few months left. He will either just kick the bucket or descend even deeper into dementia. Either way, the jockeying for position has already commenced.

      Delete
    6. Ilya, I disagree that Biden wasn't up for campaigning in 2022 (two years before the primaries). He DID campaign during the primaries in early 2024, which he won. Biden had an agenda which he was pursuing as president and he wanted to see it through. That's why he didn't step aside. There was more work to do. No one asks an incumbent who is doing such a good job to step aside.

      I find it frustrating that so many on the left buy into the swiftboating that happens during EVERY election on the right. We should defend our candidates, not join the right in criticizing them. Look at John Kerry. The mixed support he got after the swiftboating was no different than the calls for Biden to step aside. The same thing happened to Hillary, in spades. We should know better than to be divided by the right, as routinely happens these days.

      We cannot let the country fall apart with Trump's disability. That's why these midterms are so important. With majorities in both chambers, we can remove Trump in a disciplined way that makes it clear that any successor must not follow in his footsteps (at peril of being impeached). Those who implemented Trump's illegal orders are as guilty as Trump. We need to be prepared to impeach those people if they try to take over his role.

      Somerby cites Goldberg today to undermine Democratic efforts by reminding us of Biden and splitting our party again. We need to unite behind the effort to take back the presidency and restore law and order in our country. We need a leader who can undo the damage, not just be a place-holder. We need someone with passion about putting the country back on the right track. That isn't a compromise candidate, like Harris was.

      Delete
  8. I don't think demonstrators were paid, but they were organized by well-funded organizations. Other media are reporting on how the organizing is done and some of the people who are funding it. There is a lot of money behind these demonstrations. Nevertheless, I don't think the demonstrators are being paid. They're just being duped.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Of course you think they’re bring “duped.” But why you think anyone who protests against Trump or ICE is “duped” shows how short sighted (or “tribal” to use Somerby’s word) you are, as if you can think of no good faith reason why someone would protest against Trump and ICE.

      Delete
    2. "well-funded organizations" motivated by the outrage felt by those who recognize Trump's lawbreaking, corruption and bigotry, exemplified by ICE. Being organized in protests is not a crime or even a bad thing. Where does the money come from? From legitimate voters and citizens who want to stop what is happening and are doing so by exercising legal constitutional rights of protest. Duped? Does that mean Pretti and Good are still alive?

      David has the nerve to complain because someone donates to community organizations, while Trump grifts off of his supporters and profits off his rallies by charging attendees and selling merch. The hypocrisy of David's hints about well-funded demonstrations is blatant.

      Protests are not like an election. There are no laws limiting who can pay what to whom, because this is not a campaign. It is largely a spontaneous outpouring of outrage about how Trump is treating immigrants (legal and illegal) and citizens using a paramilitary guard that doesn't obey the law or the edicts of our courts. The number of people in the streets reflects the strength of our concern about Trump's abuses -- not how much some wealthy person cares, given that they are not putting anyone into office or supporting legislation or doing anything useful to donors. The people are behind this, not the wealthy. The wealthy are mainly busy bribing Trump and laundering Russian money. That David would focus on protester donations instead of the huge graft among Republicans shows David's dishonesty.

      Delete

    3. Don't those ice-harassing retarded cat-ladies have jobs?

      If they do, how come they have so much time to harass ice-officers? And if they don't, who is paying them? Who is paying for their big SUVs and expensive Swiss handguns?



      Delete
    4. The demonstrators are being duped because the people who fund and organize the demonstrations don't really care about illegal immigrants. Their goal is to undermine the legitimacy of the United States. Demonstrators are being tricked into helping them do this.

      Radical leftist groups, including one financed with $7.8 million from progressive billionaire George Soros, are behind the anti-ICE protests in Minnesota, The Post has learned.


      Indivisible Twin Cities, which describes itself as a grassroots group of volunteers, has led many of the protests against ICE raids in Minnesota, where Renee Nicole Good was shot dead Wednesday after allegedly trying to mow down an ICE agent with her vehicle.

      Indivisible is an offshoot of the Indivisible Project in Washington DC, which bills itself as a movement to defeat the “Trump agenda,” and received $7,850,000 from Soros’ Open Society Foundations between 2018 and 2023, according to public records.

      https://www.msn.com/en-us/politics/government/here-s-who-s-really-behind-the-minneapolis-ice-resistance-movement/ar-AA1TQITy

      Delete
    5. There’s something seriously the fuck wrong with you, dickhead

      Delete
    6. Note the way they report funding for a span of 5 years, which makes it sound like much more money, except if think about them having to pay DC office space rent and a few salaries over 5 years. What are the budgets of lobbying firms? Protesting a corrupt president's actions by organizing protests and visiting members of Congress is a form of lobbying after all. Why shouldn't the full time people who do the organizing get paid? Few trained people could afford to do it for free, and why should they?

      This is shifting the goal posts. David was at first claiming that the people in the street were paid, the hundreds of thousands of protesters nationwide. What would that cost if you paid each marcher $50? Way more than the budget David cites. $5 million for one single march in one year not including organizational costs.

      Oddly, Republicans seem to think that offering pay increases the chances of someone standing for hours in sub-zero weather. For me, it would decrease the chances because the money isn't worth going out in such cold. There needs to be a stronger motive, like the ones protesters are actually expressing. Republicans seek to deny those motives by suggesting money is the reason people protest. But it really makes no sense.

      Delete
    7. @12:00 doesn't know how much ICU nurses are paid. A lot, because it is a highly skilled job with a lot of responsibility. He also doesn't understand the concept of sick pay and vacation time and shift schedules. ICUs operate 24/7.

      Delete
    8. “undermine the legitimacy of the United States. Demonstrators are being tricked into helping them do this.”

      1. Trump and the GOP are undermining the legitimacy of the United States while wielding all governmental power. Trump’s corruption is off the charts. Do you have ANY criticism of his daily pardons for cash? Do you think that’s a good look for the US? His on again off again tariffs? His lies?

      2. No one has to be tricked into disliking Trump’s authoritarianism and corruption or the use of a massive army of jackbooted thugs to invade an American city, or his use of DOJ to go after his enemies, Why would you think opposition to Trump is anti-American? You and the GOP viewed opposition to Clinton, Obama, and Biden as justified. You can’t accept people feel that way about Trump?

      3. Protest is in the best tradition of America. It was founded as a result of a protest. The civil rights protests were met with massive police resistance and violence. Which side made the US look bad, the protesters, or the police?

      Delete
    9. Why do you people keep responding to dickhead’s dishonest bad faith trolling?

      Delete
    10. Trump is under water on every major issue with the general public. DiC would also like to claim for the record that the citizens of the United States are being duped. I have lived in Minneapolis. These are Midwesterners with backbone who will not have masked thugs lawlessly breaking into homes and taking people into custody in order to reach quotas.So who is being duped here?

      Delete

    11. Go protest your cats shitting into your shoes, lady.

      Delete
    12. There are legions of Trumptards whose biggest regret is that they were sitting in mommy's basement on a keyboard instead of touring the White House J6th. They have set up shop here.

      Delete
    13. I don't think demonstrators were paid, but they were organized by well-funded organizations.
      What do you mean by "organized"?
      I may be going to a protest today. I read about it on the local news website. Where is the "organizing" part?
      Also, you're not fooling anyone with your dishonest "I don't think they are getting paid", which implies that they could be paid. It's still obvious how you're putting your thumb on the scale. No one is getting paid and everyone knows that.

      Delete

    14. Yes, Hillary, legions. Legions I tell ya!

      Delete
    15. Of course they are paid. Same as here. They are Soros-monkeys.

      Delete
    16. Duped into believing crossing the border is a criminal, and not a civil, offense?
      I can't believe anyone is gullible enough to fall for that nonsense.

      Delete
    17. Rear Admiral Antifa MidwestJanuary 31, 2026 at 1:04 PM

      Comrade, please contact me. We will provide you with a professional sign and $500 cash for 5 hours of screaming at ICEholes. $100 bonus for temperature below 0°F. Also, $1,000 bonus if ICE decides to murder you for no fucking reason you fucking idiot.

      Delete
    18. @12:58 - regardless of whether it's called a crime or a civil offence, the law says that illegal immigrants are not allowed to stay in the country. That's why President Obama took pride in deporting 2 million illegal immigrants.

      Delete
    19. Fuck u fascist David, get out of here u sick fucking bigot.

      Delete
    20. Trump fingered 14 yo vaginas, he rapes children. WTF is wrong with you David? Get the fuck out of here.

      Delete
    21. Is that why ICE is detaining citizens? Is that why ICE is detaining and deporting legal immigrants with documentation? Good and Pretti were both citizens. Why did ICE kill them in cold blood?

      Regardless of what you want to call them, people granted asylum or legal residence pending a hearing are legally allowed to stay in the country. Harrassing them, as ICE is doing, is illegal and violates a bunch of court orders and decisions against ICE's practices. It is illegal to disobey our courts when they rule against you.

      Obama was president in a different time. He is not relevant to the current situation in which ICE is breaking the law with impunity, lots of laws, including first degree murder.

      Delete
    22. Why does David come here when he knows he isn't wanted? No one would do that unless they were being paid.

      Delete

    23. It's a crime, David. Unauthorized border crossing is a crime.

      Delete
    24. Most of the people who stay in the US illegally arrive on airplanes, not at any border, on tourist visas. They then overstay their visa and remain here. This focus on crossing at the border singles out the poor as if they were the only illegal immigrants. Far more come to the US on ships from Asia than cross the border. No one talks about that either. It is as if the only concept of illegal immigrant is a brown-skinned person from Latin America with kids and no English. That doesn't match the statistics on illegal immigration. It is negative stereotyping of people who are widespread in the SW and whose families were born here and have lived here for generations, some before the SW territories became US states. These are the people ICE is harrassing when it wants to round people up based on skin color and language and won't accept documents without roughing people up and detaining them for hours to weeks. This is why so many of us are upset with how ICE is doing its job.

      It ICE were serious about preventing illegals, it could make a list of those coming off planes with foreign passports, then contact them after the expiration of their 6 month visitation period and monitor their exit. They don't do anything like that.

      That's why the argument that this is about illegals and not racist is wrong. Trump is implementing a white supremacist agenda in which those who are not the right color are pushed out of the USA, regardless of citizenship. It is ugly and against the law to treat citizens and legal immigrants like that. There is no justification based on illegal residence that explains these disparities in who is being targeted, so the racism is blatant.

      Delete
    25. "regardless of whether it's called a crime or a civil offence,..."
      Say it with me, "It's called a civil offense."

      Delete
    26. Crossing the border illegally is a misdemeanor, essentially on the level of a speeding ticket.

      These days, few immigrants cross the border illegally, most come here with either permission or by claiming asylum. Asylum claims are on the rise because the US has created dumpster fires in many countries, causing some to flee their country of origin for safety and survival.

      Being an undocumented immigrant is not a crime it is a civil violation, and it is not mandated that such people are deported, it is merely one option.

      Historically we, including Republicans, have chosen to broadly allow undocumented people to remain in our country, while focusing on deporting only violent criminals.

      Obama was more successful at deporting immigrants because he focused on violent criminals and deported them in an organized and humane manner; no one has a problem with that.

      Biden took a different route and was even more successful; Biden addressed the root causes, coordinating with countries where the most immigrants come from to improve conditions.

      Trump does not care about immigrants one way or the other; Trump gets off on flexing brutality and cruelty - his goal his to silence his opponents (now a majority of Americans) or incite them in order to justify even more excessive uses of force.

      Trump's polling is a disaster (even before the latest Epstein file release documenting his repulsive behavior with young girls), and he is underwater even on immigration. Americans strongly dislike ICE, with a plurality now wanting to abolish the agency that was created in 2002.

      Trolls make dumb claims because they are unfamiliar with our laws, customs, and norms; they likely do despise immigrants in America because they are jealous, being stuck in heir own miserable countries.

      Delete
    27. "regardless of whether 2+2 is called 4 or 19..."

      Delete
    28. Civil wrongs is a tort. Illegal is a sick bird.

      Delete
    29. Only lawyers use the word tort.

      Delete
    30. 1:05. Obama deported 3 million, focusing on criminals, without using a masked gestapo that kidnaps 5 year olds and kills protestors on the street. His first term Trump deported 1.7 million. Obama’s peak deportation rate exceeded Trump’s. The shitshow that is currently ICE is targeting states that do not contain large numbers of immigrants compared with Florida and Texas. The corrupt angry demented orange Jesus is a vengeful pedo.

      Delete
  9. "Other media are reporting on how the organizing is done and some of the people who are funding it. There is a lot of money behind these demonstrations."

    Cites or just pulling it out of your ass again?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. This is the talking point of the day.

      Delete
    2. Exactly. They parrot what they see on Fox in unison. Pathetic.

      Delete
    3. Notice that dickhead in cal is one of the first to get the memo and rushes here to catapult the bullshit

      Delete
    4. It is just copium.

      womp womp

      Delete
  10. Protesters can't win with Republicans. Either they are crazy or they are paid.

    Why doesn't Somerby explain the motives of those on the left when they protest? He just leaves these disingenuous statements hanging as the only possibilities for protesters.

    And then he accepts Goldberg's view that those supporting Biden were acting in bad faith on the left. Again, no evidence and discussion of that. Somerby accepts that Democrats were lying about Biden's border efforts (Harris never said the border was locked up tight, the all or nothing formulation Somerby accepts). Again, Somerby does not defend the left or try to find evidence, reality in Goldberg's self-serving statement. No fact checking or debunking by Somerby.

    Both-sidesing a situation in which the right is far more egregious in its bad faith than the left, is dishonest on Somerby's part. It is his main message since 2015, when he slid over to the right to support Trump.

    On what planet is it a bad thing when the Democrats support their incumbent candidate, the guy who just finished winning the primaries and being nominated by his party? That isn't bad faith. It is what parties do. And then the right swift-boated Biden by attacking his age, and Somerby like Goldberg joined them. That's where we see the bad faith enter the picture. Somerby has never expressed remorse for putting Trump back into office and he (and other turn-coat Dems) bear the responsibility for what Trump is doing now.

    But Somerby first complained that Biden/Harris didn't address border issues enough, and today he buys Goldberg's claim that Harris claimed too much border success. You can't really have that both ways. But Somerby's motive to trash Harris and Dems seems pretty obvious when he agrees with Goldberg, who advocated for Biden to step aside (Somerby's own view). Unlike Somerby, Goldberg supported Harris.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I'd swear Somerby was a Right-winger, but I can't find his name in the Epstein Files to confirm it.

      Delete
    2. Too many redactions? You can protest, along with the victims and those supporting them.

      Delete
  11. When Somerby woke up this morning, the news was full of new information revealed by the latest tranche of Epstein documents released yesterday. Yet Somerby focuses on this triviality! Bill Gates has been sucking up to Trump. Was that to prevent release of the info that just came out, about his participation in Epstein's trafficking (as a client), his attempts to keep his wife from finding out he caught an STD from that activity, and then his subsequent divorce when his wife objected to his association with Epstein, when Epstein died in prison in 2019.

    Somerby used to dismiss this kind of news as gossip, which he called "sexy-time talk" but it is important when the President of the US and a prominent tech billionaire like Gates are the men involved.

    Somerby aids the coverup by ignoring the reporting on Epstein and Trump. Lutnick is still involved with Trump as Secretary of Commerce and he was named in these latest documents. How compromised are other men currently serving in Trump's admin?

    This is a huge sex scandal that should bring down Trump's government, as this has done in other nations. Somerby pretends it isn't happening. Instead he talks about Michelle Goldberg and her opinion of Biden (who is not running for anything). These stupid essays are a joke in the context of the major wrongdoing by our President. Can Somerby be any more irrelevant?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Somerby is deeply out of touch, a consequence in part of his right wing worldview.

      Delete
  12. The communists bribe people to protest but that's nothing new. They have always used bribery or extortion because they're godless and depraved. The only difference today is they don't have the power to execute or starve the ones who don't.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Antifa defeated the Republican Party ay Iwo Jima.

      Delete
    2. That's pretty good, 1:42.

      Delete
    3. Trump bribed people to clap when he came down the escalator, announcing his candidacy. Yes, Republicans are also godless and depraved. Trump is working on starving people who cannot afford food.

      Delete
    4. No one in America is starving.

      Delete
    5. "Key facts about hunger in America:
      Food Insecurity Rates: Approximately 13.5% to 13.7% of U.S. households struggled to get enough food in 2023.
      Severity: Roughly 5.4% of households (1 in 20) experienced "very low food security," a severe form of hunger where households report skipping meals or reducing intake.
      Impact on Children: Nearly 1 in 5 children in the U.S. live with hunger, with about 374,000 households with children reporting that a child experienced reduced food intake.
      Demographics and Location: Food insecurity is higher for Black (24.4%) and Latinx (20.2%) households, with the highest rates found in Southern states.
      Causes: Factors contributing to hunger include insufficient income, high cost of living, lack of transportation, and health challenges.
      While severe, acute starvation is less common due to the presence of food banks, pantries, and government assistance programs (like SNAP), many people still suffer from chronic food insecurity and the associated health consequences of poor nutrition. "

      Delete
  13. Nearly half of all U.S. workers make less than a living wage.
    Thank you, Mr. President.

    ReplyDelete
  14. "A judge has ordered freedom for the immigration witness identified as Liam Conejo Ramos, a five-year-old that school officials said was detained in Minneapolis, Minnesota.

    The use of a 5-year-old Minneapolis child who was grabbed off the street and used as bait to arrest his immigrant father by an ICE agent has set off a wave of outrage comparable to the shooting of 37-year-old mom Renee Good, which prompted a Hofstra law professor to warn the child's health and life are both at risk.

    Now, a judge has ordered the administration to free the boy, according to Politico's Kyle Cheney."

    Trump keeps losing these court cases.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The Supreme Court of the United States rules 5–4 giving President Trump expanded authority under the Alien Enemies Act, clearing the way for faster deportations of violent gang members.

      Delete
    2. "Yes, as of May 2025, the Supreme Court has heavily restricted the Biden-era/Trump-era administration's use of the 1798 Alien Enemies Act for mass deportations. The Court blocked the rapid removal of Venezuelan nationals, ruling that detainees are entitled to due process and "constitutionally adequate notice" before expulsion, effectively pausing actions based on the Act. "

      Delete
  15. The Supreme Court of the United States rules 5–4 giving President Trump expanded authority under the Alien Enemies Act, clearing the way for faster deportations of violent gang members.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. "Yes, as of May 2025, the Supreme Court has heavily restricted the Biden-era/Trump-era administration's use of the 1798 Alien Enemies Act for mass deportations. The Court blocked the rapid removal of Venezuelan nationals, ruling that detainees are entitled to due process and "constitutionally adequate notice" before expulsion, effectively pausing actions based on the Act. "

      Delete
  16. This American Life on NPR is playing recorded 911 calls from Charlotte, NC. Listen at your own risk. Your head may explode.

    ReplyDelete
  17. "The police chief for a southern Minnesota city intervened this week to prevent federal immigration officers from arresting a Minnesotan, Minnesota Public Radio reported Saturday.

    The Minnesotan – a woman who did not want to be identified out of fear of retaliation – spoke with MPR about her encounter with federal immigration officers, who she had been tracking the movements of in her vehicle with a dashcam.

    The woman said that after tracking federal immigration officers’ movements, three vehicles began “chasing her,” MPR reported, and trying to “box her in.” Video of the incident shared with the outlet shows a vehicle speeding in front of her and slamming its breaks, after which three officers exited the vehicle and drew their firearms, demanding she exit the vehicle.

    The federal immigration officers then dragged the woman out of her car, leaving her “with multiple cuts, scrapes and bruises,” MPR reported, and ultimately arrested and started transporting her to the Twin Cities, “presumably” to an ICE detention facility at the Whipple Federal Building.

    The woman recalled, however, the federal immigration officers receiving a phone call – “apparently from an ICE supervisor” – after which the officers reversed course and drove back to St. Peter, where she was arrested.

    St. Peter Police Chief Matt Grochow, in an email to MPR, confirmed that the federal immigration officers had taken the woman to the St. Peter Police Department headquarters.

    “ICE returned the female to our police department, I saw her, and I gave her a ride home,” Grochow told MPR in an email."

    Here is yet another citizen who was mistreated by ICE simply for exercising her rights to observe their activities. This shouldn't be happening.

    ReplyDelete