THURSDAY, JANUARY 8, 2026
Life in our American Babel: This morning, in the first few minutes of Morning Joe, producers played a memorable bit of videotape.
Minnesota governor Tim Walz had described the way yesterday's fatal shooting was being characterized in certain quarters.
"This is not a normal world," Walz had memorably said.
In certain ways, that statement is true—but in other ways it isn't. We'll start to explain that below.
Videotape was also played of another memorable statement. Here's the way an exchange went down at the scene of the fatal shooting:
The shooting of Renee Good had just occurred. A physician was present on the scene.
In the moments after the shooting occurred, he tried to go to Good's car to see if he could help. An ICE official told him to stay where he was:
"We have our own medics," the ICE official said.
(Reportedly, it took something like fifteen minutes for those medics to arrive on the scene.)
"We have our own medics," the ICE official said. In making the physician stay where he was, he may have been following some sort of strange protocol. We have no idea.
We do know this:
ICE officials (and almost everyone else) don't just have their own medics at this point in time. Like almost everyone else, they probably tend to have their own storylines, insults and claims—and members of our various tribes are inclined stick to their standard tribal realities like drowning men cling to a raft.
This is not a normal world, Governor Walz said. The lunacy which now pervades our failing world is highly abnormal in basic ways—but it typifies what tends to happen when large population split into groups and begin to wage war on each other.
The lunacy is general at this time over our failing society. Much more remains to be said about the instant reactions to yesterday's shooting. But is there any way to win a war of this type?
We don't think the answer is obvious—and despite the lunacy from other sources, we Blues are a part of this too.
More on this topic to come. We want to show you some of the things which were said yesterday afternoon on The Five, but the story moves on even from there.
We're living inside an American Babel. Is there some way to turn back?
All too typical a post by Somerby. "We blues are part of this too. More on this topic to come." Always in the second to last paragraph. And always, nothing later. Way to go, Bob.
ReplyDelete
ReplyDelete"Like almost everyone else, they probably tend to have their own storylines, insults and claims"
If I were one of them, an ICE officer, my "storyline" would've been this simple question: why do Democrat bosses recruit retarded Democrat cat-ladies to harass immigration-control officers? Other than the usual destructive and chaos-producing Democrat politics, what is the point of it?
Do you have an answer, Bob?
Chaos-producing politics....yeah, see a lot of that....caused by Dems?.....nope, caused by MAGA.
DeleteHahaha. Why would he have an answer for deplorable MAGAt scum like you?
ReplyDelete"members of our various tribes are inclined stick to their standard tribal realities like drowning men cling to a raft"
ReplyDeleteI've often wondered why Somerby allows this comment section to be overrun by the crazies. I'll guess the reason is that the comments tend to exemplify his fundamental point that both tribes are overwhelmingly populated by the closed-minded.
DG, there are three conservatives here. David, an anonymouse, and me. Are we closed-minded? David thinks the officer was at fault. The anonymouse thinks the officer’s action was correct. I am not sure.
DeleteWhat Democrat here has an alternative view from all the other democrats?
He may simply not pay attention to or care about the comments either way.
DeleteYou want my opinion? I think DiC is very closed-minded, though he pretends otherwise. I think you are one of the few who are relatively open-minded, although strongly conservative. I don't know the Anon you're referring to.
Delete5:55 - That very well could be true. But it's difficult for me to believe that. He works hard, doing research and writing two posts a day, week in and week out, for years, without pay. It seems that he would want to see what his readers think.
DeleteCecelia is a liar with Zero Integrity.
Delete6:05 - Sounds like your mind is made up on that point.
DeleteAnonymouse 6:05pm, you’re the CEO of Zero Integrity (Inc)
DeleteNot exactly what David has said. He's more of the mind that some innocent bystanders will get shot, but he thinks it's the price worth paying. In other words, he doesn't give a shit.
DeleteYour take, Cecelia, on purpose or not, is incomprehensible. Neither you nor David have the intellectual capacity to see the forest for the trees. I'll just go with Bob's ubiquitous refrain: pity the child.
Mao is just a performance artist, whose purpose to shine the spotlight on the moral decrepitude of right-wingers and Trump supporters.
DG: You're partially correct. Each side picks and chooses which events to emphasize. With that said, the positions are not symmetrical at all. Unencumbered prevarications from the right-wingers is beyond the pale. Moral and intellectual bankruptcy of MAGA cannot be overestimated. So far as I can tell, Bob is well aware of that fact.
DeleteIIya, how is it incomprehensible to say I don’t know what happened? That’s a rather ironic take from a guy (you) who said that he wouldn’t accept any opinion but one that echos his own,
DeleteCecelia forgot to count Somerby among the conservatives.
DeleteIlya - I've never considered the possibility that Mao is a performance artist putting us all on. (I have wondered, at times, if Trump is a genius performance artist, seeing how far he can push it before admitting it's all just an act.) And I agree that Red Squalor is much, much worse than Blue Squalor (and I think Somerby also agrees).
DeleteYou don't know what happened? Let me help you, Cecelia: a woman got shot in the head at close range, for no discernible reason.
DeleteI don't know if Mao is the old Mao of 20 years ago. Either way, they both suck.
DeleteGeorge you seem only slightly less crazy then the other trolls - Cecelia and Davis and Mao. Your comment here is meant to suggest otherwise, but it fails.
DeleteIIya, so straight to jail, huh?
DeleteUnlike you fascists, we believe in due process Cecelia. Zero credibility, liar.
DeleteIlya - Detaining anyone is potentially dangerous. A bystander, a perp or an officer might get harmed. But, despite the risk we have to arrest criminals
DeleteWhether or not you call illegal immigrants "criminals," they are people that our law says should be picked up and detained. That's our law, like it or not..
My impression is that a lot of people oppose following the law that says illegal immigrants should be deported. I think a lot of these people hope that by sufficiently interfering with ICE, the law will be thwarted. People behaving this way, including Ms Good are vigilantes, defending upon which definition one chooses. These people are not organized to suppress and punish crime. Quite the reverse. However they are self-appointed doers of justice.
Anonymouse 7:15pm, oh, no, brother, any other opinion as to what might have happened is incoherent or worse…
DeleteMy impression is that a lot of people oppose following the law that says illegal immigrants should be deported.
DeleteThere's no such law. Whether intentionally or not, David, but you always start from a predicate that is not at all a given.
Republicans/right wingers always ignore asymmetry - illegally entering the US is a misdemeanor, like a speeding violation; being an undocumented immigrant is not a crime it is a civil violation; there is no law that mandates undocumented immigrants be deported.
DeleteMost people commit minor offenses or civil violations daily, such as speeding, jaywalking, or minor noise violations, often without facing legal consequences. These types of violations are generally overlooked by law enforcement in the interest of practicality and resource allocation.
Even Justice Scalia said that "everybody breaks the law" to some extent, during oral arguments in United States v. McCarty (2014), highlighting the reality that minor infractions are widespread among the general population, which underscores the idea that the legal system is often more complex than strict adherence to every law. His acknowledgment points to a recognition that not all violations warrant enforcement actions or severe penalties, suggesting the need for discretion in law enforcement practices. This relates directly to the treatment of undocumented immigrants. If everyday violations are often overlooked, it raises questions about the disproportionate focus on immigration enforcement compared to other civil infractions.
The intense focus on deporting undocumented immigrants highlights a selective approach to enforcement. While many citizens regularly engage in behaviors that break the law, the consequences for undocumented individuals can be severe and immediate, including deportation.
This disparity raises questions about fairness in the legal system and the criteria used to prioritize enforcement actions. It suggests a societal inconsistency in how laws are applied and enforced.
Historically, many Republicans recognized the vital contributions of immigrants to the economy and society. Policies supporting migrant workers and comprehensive immigration reform have roots in earlier Republican administrations.
Even Reagan famously supported immigration reforms, including the Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986, which granted amnesty to millions of undocumented immigrants. This act acknowledged the importance of integrating immigrants into American society, a position that contemporary Republicans might see as too lenient.
More recently, there has been a significant shift within the Republican Party regarding immigration. The current hardline stance that favors deportation without due process starkly contrasts with earlier Republican views that embraced immigrant contributions.
The current call for strict enforcement and immediate deportation reflects a departure from this historical understanding and illustrates a narrow focus on immigration issues. This contrasts with the party’s past policies that recognized immigrants as essential to various sectors, particularly agriculture and labor.
Dogface - IMO Trump is indeed a genius performance artist. He used those skills in 2016 to trick the media into gibing him the coverage that allowed him to win the nomination.
DeleteBut, Trump is not only a performance artist. He has plenty of other characteristics, some positive, some negative. A notable positive one is courage. he showed that courage today when he withdrew from 66 international organizations, knowing that he'd be criticized for doing so.
There's even a more obvious example of ignoring violation of federal law: all those marijuana dispensaries, about half a dozen just within spitting distance from my house. Under the federal law, they are all illegal.
DeleteAgain, there's no law requiring hunting down and deporting undocumented residents. Period.
IIya, so straight to jail, huh?
DeleteYes, we should all heed the measured, reasonable words of our leaders, and let all the facts come out. Right? That's what Trump, Noem, Vance and other mental and moral midgets are demanding? They are not slandering the dead mother, whose children have been orphaned. They didn't call her any bad names, like, say, a "left-wing terrorist".
I see what I see. I know what I know about what's going on in this country? Straight to jail, you say? There won't even be a real investigation.
8:31 well said.
DeleteOf course ignored by the trolls.
"...they are people that our law says should be picked up and detained. That's our law, like it or not.."
DeleteLike Ilya said, that's just wrong. Our law says that people who enter the country "without inspection" can petition for asylum or be paroled into the US. There's no law that says they must be immediately arrested or deported. You're simply wrong.
QiB: There's simply no law demanding that we must pursue every undocumented person in this country. In fact, back in the day, the infamous libtard, called Ronald Reagan amnestied millions of them. Per David, Reagan acted unconstitutionally.
Delete8:55. Hahaha. If there is one trait that your orange Jesus has displayed without failure, it is that he only cares about how his actions play out with the nimrods who still cling to him. It took zero courage to abandon climate related treaties because he knows that his ardent followers favor coal mining over renewable energy. Just as pardoning drug cartel kingpins and sleaze ball white collar millionaire crooks in exchange for large sums of money does not require courage when the MAGAts who defend his every action have no problem with that form of corruption.
DeleteIlya,
DeleteThe Right believe Reagan is "woke" now, because EVERYTHING but the bigotry is negotiable.
Anon@8:24 -- I believe that you're correct. Trump following is a cult. They have no ideology or fundamental underpinnings other than loyalty to Trump.
Delete"Vance Announces Assistant Attorney General Focused on Fraud"
ReplyDeleteJesus. Sounds like Vance is going to have Trump investigated.
That is why the fascist fuckwits got rid of all the Inspectors General. They are so fucking concerned about corruption.
DeleteI know I've pleaded for Anons to use nyms, without any semblance of success, but let me try one last time:
ReplyDeleteMost of the interesting comments here are made by those with nyms. When I read this comment section, I tend to skip over the anons and and look for threads that include the nyms I follow. So if you make an interesting comment, and you use a nym, I'm way, way more likely to read the next comment you make. And I bet I'm not the only one.
This explains a lot. I find the comments of those with nyms, except Cecelia’s Old Man and Ilya, to be not worth reading at all. I cannot imagine what DG would find worthwhile in them.
DeleteThat emphasizes the cognitive distance between right and left, not just over facts but also over ideas and values.
Given that these nymrods are who Somerby attracts, there is little of value in Somerby’s essays either. He cannot even bring himself to deplore this shooting.
So by using a nym I'm doing you a courtesy. You can readily skip my comments.
Delete6:22 most of us tend to skip over your comments as well, unless you directly respond to one of our comments with your typical ignorance, compelling us to correct the record.
DeleteWe are glad you skip over our comments, we have little interest in engaging with bad faith actors like yourself.
I am responding to your comment here because you seem to be in serious denial about yourself, and frankly it is hard for some of us to ignore people like you who are delusional and in need of a reality check.
Anonymouse 7:09pm, you don’t skip over anyone’s comments. You consider this board as being your gangland turf and you monitor it and chafe at every errant… opinion.
DeleteYou keep showing us who you are Cecelia. Apparently oblivious that you are describing yourself.
Delete"This is not a normal world," Walz had memorably said.
ReplyDeleteIn certain ways, that statement is true—but in other ways it isn't.”
I am absolutely certain than Walz did not mean to say that everything about this world is abnormal. That is not how language works. It makes Somerby’s tesponse fatuous. But that is how Somerby rolls — with a stupid strawman that Walz has called everything abnormal when it is obvious what he is referring to (at least to liberals).
To be fair, it is hard to process watching Democracy being destroyed by billionairess.
DeleteAnonymouse 6:27pm, Bob said :
Delete“This is not a normal world," Walz had memorably said.
In certain ways, that statement is true—but in other ways it isn't.”’
………………………,,,,
Bob’s point isn’t that Walz believes that the entire world is abnormal. Bob is ruing that HE (Bob) thinks that the abnormal is now our new NORMAL.
Bob is doing more than just misrepresenting Walz's statement; he is flattening asymmetries in a way that obscures the real dynamics at play.
DeleteWalz is clearly addressing the pressing issues of division and unrest, especially highlighted by incidents like the recent shooting.
To suggest that this situation is symmetrical or equally attributable to both sides is misleading. Republicans currently hold power and wield it in ways that have created 'abnormal' circumstances, situations that Dems, when in power, do not replicate. Bob's framing of these issues doesn't acknowledge that different groups experience reality in significantly different ways, effectively obscuring the specific challenges that need to be addressed.
This flattening creates a false equivalency. By trying to equate the actions of Democrats to those of Republicans, Bob ignores the ongoing oppression faced by various communities. When those in power attempt to dominate others, it's essential for those who support the oppressed to stand up and fight back. Reducing these complexities to a simple tribal conflict does a disservice to the very real struggles that exist.
Understanding and confronting these asymmetries is critical for humanizing the discourse and addressing the root causes of our societal problems.
9:13,
DeleteIn Somerby's defense, he knows rats aren't going to fuck themselves.
Why would any of us care what was said on The Five?
ReplyDeleteLike it when day insult da wimmin. Smelly bloody fat va-gi-gis and all.
DeleteThis is a good point, Republicans notably get squeamish about real women.
DeleteBut they seem fascinated by males, and young girls.
Weird people, Republicans.
There has been one homicide in Mnnpls in 2026. It was committed by an ICE officer yesterday.
ReplyDeleteHow big of a pussy are you if you are dressed for combat in Fallujah so you feel safe to enter a fucking public High School? I hear the teachers union had rocket propelled grenades in their bunker.
ReplyDeleteFor Cecilia:
ReplyDeletehttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6ywLEESFDu0
Describe it, please, Hector. I only follow Bob’s link.
DeleteOk
DeleteCBS News interviewed a retired ICE agent (White male), that in no uncertain terms said this was a misuse of deadly force:
Delete"If someone is fleeing, that is not a justification for the use of deadly force."
"You should not be intentionally putting yourself in front of a vehicle."
The report also notes DHS policy to not fire at fleeing vehicles.
The perpetrator was not a recent hire, he is an experienced agent, so he should be trained in deescalation techniques and reserving deadly force for only when it is necessary, but he has a history of aggressive behavior and creating dangerous situations.
“ I only follow Bob’s link.”
DeleteUnwilling to learn I see.
How many Ice agents are so good at there job they get drug down the street one day, and murder a woman for absolutely no reason another day? A true professional.
DeleteThe video asserts that Cecelia is a lying cuck.
DeleteI can not respond to George about his misunderstanding on how trials work in the earlier TDH post, comments appear to be locked, so I am addressing George's last comment there, here:
ReplyDeleteThat is not a counterargument.
In cases involving self-defense, particularly for law enforcement, the defendant indeed has the burden to provide evidence supporting their claim that their perception of danger was reasonable.
Instead of addressing this critical point, you sidestep into a semantic dead end by fixating on the difference between "burden of proof" and "burden of production." While the distinction is relevant, it doesn’t change the fact that Ross must substantiate his claim of self-defense. It seems you are trying to divert attention from your earlier misunderstanding with semantics.
It appears you’ve researched terminology to bolster your argument, but instead of engaging with the complexity of the situation, you lean toward word games, obscuring the fundamental issues at play.
Anonymouse 8:02pm, the comments on that board aren’t locked. When the comments reach 200 and over you must scroll down to the end of the board and click to open the rest of the comments. Then you’ll find your comment under the poster that you had addressed.
Delete8:02 good luck, your points are too substantive for trolls like "George" to respond to with any coherence or credibility.
Delete8:02 - You told us Ross would have to prove numerous elements “beyond a reasonable doubt.” You’re wrong. And, frankly, I don’t have the patience to explain to you the difference between the burdens of production and of proof, or to explain the quantum of evidence that would satisfy those burdens.
DeleteIt is kind of funny that one troll is trying to distance himself from the other trolls because their rabid lunacy is being exposed by them leaning into the Trump admin's cruelty.
ReplyDeleteIt is not going to work, but still, it is kind of amusing.
And it mirrors the severe split forming among Republicans as Trump descends in popularity, dragging the whole party down with him; his parting gift as he heads towards that lake of fire.
Two people were shot by either ICE or CBP agents (conflicting accounts) in Portland this afternoon. Shooting apparently is the default now.
ReplyDeleteAccording to Dept of Homeland security
DeleteAt 2:19 PST, US Border Patrol agents were conducting a targeted vehicle stop in Portland, Oregon. The passenger of the vehicle and target is a Venezuelan illegal alien affiliated with the transnational Tren de Aragua prostitution ring and involved in a recent shooting in Portland. The vehicle driver is believed to be a member of the vicious Venezuelan gang Tren de Aragua. When agents identified themselves to the vehicle occupants, the driver weaponized his vehicle and attempted to run over the law enforcement agents.
Fearing for his life and safety, an agent fired a defensive shot. The driver drove off with the passenger, fleeing the scene.
https://x.com/DHSgov/status/2009427948541993323
According to the Department of Homeland Security Renee Nicole Good was a terrorist who weaponized her car. So what exactly is your point?
DeleteAt least 800,000 Americans have died from illegal drugs in the last two decades, but Democrats are morally outraged that two members of a Latino drug gang were wounded by ICE agents in Portland. The nerdy mayor, Keith Wilson, who allowed at least 8 months of antifa violence nightly in Portland, now wants ICE out of his city because "our community desires peace." What a moron and what a hypocrite!
DeleteYou don't have to live in Portland if you don't want to, which is great because they wouldn't want you.
DeleteGet back to us when you have collected data for the past 2 decades regarding deaths from gun violence, especially among children, and why the Republicans are more concerned about children and vaccines than their number one killer.
DeleteThe only reason Trump pardoned the Honduran drug-runner who was flooding the USA with illegal drugs, is that Donald J. Trump is a Soros-bot.
DeleteDon't let Right-wingers fool you with their lies.
DeleteThey love Soros-bots.
On the truthfulness of DHS information:
Delete'Noem said at a news conference earlier in the day that the agents’ vehicles got stuck in the snow and that they were trying to push them out when the woman “attacked them.”'
At this point there are at least three videos from different angles showing that the murdered woman was driving her car at a speed of a few miles per hour when she was shot, that she was turning her car away from the ice agents, and that when the first shot was fired the killer's feet were not in line with the trajectory of the car. This is obvious especially in slow motion. Afterwards the killer walked briskly toward her car, a fact that completely puts the lie to Trump's statement, and Noem, who is forever cosplaying in her cowboy hat, lied that the woman was a terrorist. Vance spewed similar bullshit. So the question is, when the top authority figures in this government feel comfortable making statements that are directly contradicted by our own eyes, what about that which is more obscure? Economic data coming from government agencies under Trump's thumb have very little credibility at this point, as does any statement about Greenland and our national interests nor Venezuela and the motives behind replacing Madurai with members of his corrupt regime.
ReplyDeleteMadura
DeleteDonald Trump regarding Renee Nicole Good: “She ran him over. She didn’t try to run him over. She ran him over.” Nothing, absolutely nothing that comes out of this clown’s mouth nor that of his minions can be assumed to have any ties to reality.
DeleteNoem has dozens of Barbie Cosplay hats. She needed that extra large cowboy hat to cover up botox gone wrong around her eyebrows. Lizard people, not from this earth. And worse, she is a harlot fucking skeevy Corey Lewandowski, ewwwwwww.
DeletePresident Trump just cut the US trade deficit IN HALF, lowest in nearly 2 decades
ReplyDeletehttps://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/4361130/posts
Tariffs that raise the price of imported goods and markedly devaluing the dollar will reliably cut the trade deficit, however bad those are for the buying power of the American consumer.
DeleteAnd who, exactly, came up with those figures? The same people who feel comfortable telling you not to believe your own eyes? You would have to be very stupid or gullible, or most likely both, to accept as fact anything coming out of the mouths of Trump or those who know that presenting him with economic numbers he doesn’t like will get you fired. Yup, stupid and gullible. A dyed in the wool MAGAt.
DeleteDavid in Cal,
DeleteWill you vote for the person who says no one can identify a Republican voter who isn't a bigot?
Or is that person too successful for you to cast a vote for?
Trade deficit cut in half! That's as impressive as the GDP numbers (and as relevant to people's well-being).
DeleteSo I want to know how I correct my trade deficit with my grocery store. I go in and they take my money and all I get is food. Why I must most certainly balance that, right?
Delete
DeleteCopilot
What is a Trade Deficit, and how can it affect a nation's economy? - Finance Dispatch
The trade deficit can have complex effects on the economy, influencing growth, investment, and employment, but it is not inherently negative.
Hi, I am looking for Mr. and Miss Fanny Titus. Have I come to the right blog comment section?
ReplyDeleteAnywhere there are Right-wingers posting, is the right place.
DeleteThere's lots of stinky shit in those places, since Right-wing "facts" are pulled out of their asses.
As Democrats, we have nothing to worry about. We have Jasmine Crockett and Mayor Pete Buttigieg waiting in the wings to electrify the American people with their soul, stirring charisma and brilliant political ideas.
ReplyDeleteThe American people want a woman or a gay to lead them. They are thirsting for it. Nothing could possibly go wrong.
DeleteDonald Trump Jr. is gaining ground and polling at 20% compared with JD Vance at 35% for the next Republican presidential candidate. Are you proud of yourselves?
DeleteAmerica is going to be one big transvestite freak off. Free baby oil to needy families.
DeleteThe person who posts at TDH about there not being a Republican voter who isn't a bigot, is the most successful person on TDH, since they are right about what they post each and every time.
DeleteThey asked Jasmine Crockett for a comment about Minneapolis but she was too busy eating fried chicken and waffles to respond. They tried to call her later but her phone wasn't working because she didn't pay the bill. The story was in Slate.
DeleteThey asked the people who don't get paid by corporations that own our media, and every one of them admitted there is no such thing as a Republican voter who isn't a bigot.
DeleteYou're not being serious. Crockett has called for bringing all false eyelash manufacturing back to the United States. I agree with her when she says "why we be offshoring that shit?"
DeleteYou apparently don't care about jobs for working people.
Meanwhile, President Limpdick is letting corporations hire illegal immigrants, while the people laugh behind his back.
DeleteSad.
Totally. But don't worry, pretty soon we'll have our first female President who is also a 47-year-old great grandmother.
DeleteLove how the cucks can't handle a strong black woman.
Delete
ReplyDelete@Cecelia, 5:51
"The anonymouse thinks the officer’s action was correct."
No, that's not right, Cecelia. I don't care about the officer. And besides it's not possible to judge his actions based on the info I have. But in any case, I'm not interested in passing judgement on individuals.
What I am interested in is socio-economic and political phenomena. Here it is, again:
The Democrat swamp has been running, for about a year, the campaign of using (mostly) retarded cat-ladies to harass immigration-control officers.
Statistically, sooner or later, one of the cat-ladies was going to die. And now it happened.
This is an escalation that, I reckon, the Democrat swamp was expecting and planning for. Consequently the Democrat swamp is 100% responsible for it. The Democrat swamp will now use it to the fullest extent possible.
And that's it, pretty much. Actions and motivations of specific individuals (especially any low-level participants, like the officer and the untimely departed cat-lady) are irrelevant to this analysis.
Mao is correct that no one cares about the officer.
DeleteHe;'s like one of the policemen Republicans are always trying to de-fund.
Who gives a shit about the loser?
As every Right-winger I ever met says, "Fuck the police."
6:50,
DeleteThe squealing of precious, dainty, snowflakes like yourself, is music to my ears.
I feel as if I'm speaking for everyone here when I say we appreciate you taking the time out of your busy day to squeal and cry on the internet. It really puts a smile on all of our faces.
Keep up the great, work.
"The Democrat swamp has been running, for about a year, the campaign of using (mostly) retarded cat-ladies to harass immigration-control officers."
Delete"Mostly." Gosh trumptard, you're so nuanced. You've gone all woke.
Thank you, retarded cat-lady.
DeleteYou can't blame the officer for doing the job he was hired and trained to do, which is harass non-whites.
ReplyDeleteThis guy is so competent when he ain't getting needlessly dragged down the street he is needlessly shooting people in the face. Time for a promotion.
Delete