SATURDAY: The miracle suddenly looks like this!

SATURDAY, FEBRUARY 14, 2026

Eighth-graders bypass Lourdes: We'd call it one of his weak spots. 

As we noted in Monday's report, Nicholas Kristof has endorsed the claim of that "Mississippi miracle" in a recent column for the New York Times.

(To his credit, he didn't use the term "miracle," nor has he done so in the past. Almost everyone does.)

The miracle involves the miraculous Naep scores produced by that state's (good, decent, deserving) public school kids. As you may know, the Naep is a highly regarded federal program which tests reading and math, every few years, in Grade 4 and Grade 8. 

(For most purposes, there are reasons to skip the Grade 12 scores.). 

The Naep is a highly regarded program. On Tuesday, we focused on this miraculous finding, as cited in Kristof's column:

These Three Red States Are the Best Hope in Schooling

[...]

Black fourth graders in Mississippi are on average better readers than those in Massachusetts, which is often thought to have the best public school system in the country (and one that spends twice as much per pupil).

Say what? Mississippi's black fourth graders outperformed their counterparts in Massachusetts? 

At least on its face, that claim is correct! Whatever the explanation might be, here are the relevant scores from the most recent testing:

Average scores, 2024 Naep 
Black kids, Grade 4 reading

Massachusetts: 202.86
Mississippi: 205.93

If genuine, that may or may not constitute a miracle. But given the circumstances mentioned by Kristof, it looks like a major accomplishment.

(According to a very rough rule of thumb, a gap of 10-11 points on the Naep is often said to correspond, very roughly, to one academic year.)

As if to prove that everyone makes mistakes, we then uncorked a whopper. (As we've mentioned several times, the incessant flooding of the zone has had us feeling overwhelmed. Plus, the Super Bowl!)

As of today, a double groaner has been corrected in Tuesday's report. What we had meant to present can be seen belowMississippi's white fourth graders also came fairly close to matching the kids up north:

Average scores, 2024 Naep
White kids, Grade 4 reading

Massachusetts: 233.21
Mississippi: 230.85

(By the way: When we look at the giant gaps between white and black kids in each of those states, do we really want to claim that anyone's producing a miracle at this point in time?)

At any rate, there you see the fourth grade scores from the most recent Naep. Mississippi's black kids outscored their peers in Massachusetts. Mississippi's white kids came close.

If nothing is "wrong" with those test scores, that result would seem to represent a substantial, surprising accomplishment. That said, adult life doesn't begin after fourth gradeand here are the corresponding scores from that same year for eighth grade students in those two states:

Average scores, 2024 Naep
Black kids, Grade 8 reading

Massachusetts: 252.03
Mississippi: 242.94
Average scores, 2024 Naep
White kids, Grade 8 reading

Massachusetts: 275.88
Mississippi: 263.83

Borrowing from the early Dylan: But oh, what kind of miracle is this, which goes from great to worse?

There you see a puzzling aspect of this alleged miracle. Over the course of quite a few years, Mississippi's fourth graders have been racking up surprising, nearly miraculous test scores. But by the time the state's kids reach Grade 8, the scores continue to look quite a bit like what they were in the past.

Quickly, let's state the obvious:

The fourth graders who performed so well in 2024 may still be performing that well when they reach the eighth grade and are tested in 2028. But Mississippi's well-intention education reforms have been in place for a long time, and this same pattern keeps showing up:

A miracle seems to be present in Grade 4. But there's no sign of any such phenomenon when you look at the scores from Grade 8.

Why might such a pattern obtain? After fifty years of flogging varieties of this horse, we won't waste our time going there today. For today, we'll only ask you this:

If kids are doing well in fourth grade, but have regressed by the time they finish eighth grade, then what good was that early achievementassuming it really existed?

Kristof cited the Grade 4 scores; he didn't cite Grade 8. In the process, he retold a type of story which has been told ever since the 1960s, when we the people began to pretend that we actually care about black kids.

It's the story of the (alleged) public school miracle, allegedly produced by the handful of people who actually care! Versions of this story have floated around at least since 1967, when 36 Children appeared

In the early 1970s, by total coincidence, we stumbled upon one of the ways miraculous test scores will sometimes appear. (Two friends described the outrageous cheating taking place in their high-scoring, low-income schoola school which was endlessly praised in the Baltimore Sun.)

By the early 1980s, we had stumbled into a telephone relationship with a top executive at one of that era's major testing companies. He was the first to tell us how bad this phenomenon can sometimes get. 

(He told us that school districts can pay to have their students' answer sheets scanned for unusual erasure patterns. Three decades later, the Atlanta Journal-Constitution blew the whistle on the "erasure parties" staged within Atlanta's schools, in which teachers gathered to change reams of wrong answers on students' completed answer sheets to the answers which was correct.)

We know of zero reason to assume that any such fraudulent behavior ever took place in Mississippi. As far as we know, no such misconduct is even possible with respect to the Naep, given the way the Naep is administered.

That said, one event after another, through many long years, convinced us that no one should ever accept these miracle claims on their face. Simple story:

Our journalists love to tell these storiesand repeatedly, these stories turn out to be bogus.

We the humans have pleasing stories we simply love to tell! The story of the educational miracle engineered by the handful of people who actually care is one of these treasured tales.

Note to Kristof, whose overall work we marvel at and greatly admire:

Our "education experts" were endlessly asleep at the switch, down through the many long years, as these feel-good stories came and went. So was the New York Times! When the whistle was finally blown on major cheating scandals in Atlanta and (apparently) in D.C., it was the Atlanta paper, and the much-maligned USA Today, which finally did the work.

(When Michelle Rhee was nominated to be chancellor of the D.C. schools, it was obvious that something was crazily wrong with the test score gains she was claiming from her short teaching career. It was obvious that her claims didn't make statistical sensebut so what? The Washington Post agreed to roll over and pretend that nothing was wrong.)

(Also, Philadelphia.)

Yes, Virginia! We were even present, behind the scenes, when Dr. John Cannell unveiled his Lake Wobegon Reports in the late 1980swhen he reported, perhaps a bit inaccurately, that every state in the nation was reporting that their statewide test scores were, in fact, above average! 

That was a wonderfully comical narrative hook, and the nation's journalists briefly took note. After that, our education journalists went back to sleep, snoring loudly alongside our education experts.

(Back in 2006, we demonstrated that the miracle story concerning one Washington area elementary school was in fact horribly wrong. The Washington Post's Jay Mathews, with whom we share the old school system tie and whose work we greatly admire, told the tale right here.)

Full disclosure: There are certain feel-good stories we humans love to tell! We continue to tell those stories, no matter how often such stories turn out to be bogus.

As to the apparent anomalies in Mississippi's scoring patterns, we know of zero reason to think that overt acts of fraud have ever been part of the story. (Repeatwe know of zero reason.) 

That said, the scoring pattern doesn't seem to make sense. Still, the story lives on.

Anthropologists crowd our dreams at night, telling us things like this:

This is who, and this is what, we actually are as a species!

For the record, there's a different possible explanation for those anomalous Mississippi scoring patterns. We don't know if it's right or wrong.

(Then too, we can think of one or two more.)

We're no longer going to bother with such maddening explorations. That's especially true at this point, as the entire American political structure may be crashing to the ground. 

Is something "wrong" with those Grade 4 scores? To this day, we can't answer that question. We can say that Mississippi's eighth grade scores don't seem to be playing along.

Again, we apologize for Tuesday's dispiriting blunder. We've corrected the blunder in Tuesday's report. The flooding of the zone!

Now for the rest of the story: Still in the early 1980s, that high executive told us that he was leaving the testing business. He said that his company was losing market share to a rival testing companyand he said they felt they couldn't compete, because the rival company was allegedly faking its data (its "norms") so as to produce better test scores.

The executive, who is no longer living, went on to a different public career. Just for the record: 

At that time, it was publicly reported that the Iowa Test of Basic Skills was losing substantial market share to the California Achievement Test. At some point, the switch was made here in Baltimore, perhaps because it was widely bruited that urban systems ended up with better scores on the latter test.

We're telling you what the executive said. We don't know if his suspicions were accurate. 


52 comments:


  1. "We don't know if it's right or wrong."

    Nobody cares. As long as their education doesn't turn children into woke zombies, it's fine.

    Besides, in this day and age, in this world controlled by Democrat-globalist vermin, education has lost all of its value in the West: you can easily find a well-educated serf, in India or Thailand, who will work for a bowl of rice.

    Tell your children to quit school and learn a fucking trade!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. It is telling that foreign students are being blocked from higher ed (grad programs) by Trump's immigration policies. Our universities used to be the best in the world and now our own students are being handicapped in their ability to do the work required at that level. Without grad students, research will be disabled and without innovation our businesses and technology will be slowed in its progress. The stupidest people in our country (Trump and his buddies) are destroying what has made our American economy strong, the innovation and technological progress that has led in so many industries. If you block the pathway to learning in the early grades, kids don't succeed in higher grades and they cannot compete.

      Years ago, Eisenhower recognized that America would need better education to compete in a world economy. He invested in schools. Later, Ronald Reagan commissioned a study called A Nation at Risk, again recognizing the need to invest in all students, including gifted and talented, and pushed schools to nurture talent. George W. Bush temporarily derailed such efforts by linking teacher pay with student performance and revising curriculum, but our schools were doing well before covid, especially in math improvement.

      Trump doesn't value education and he doesn't recognize the link between education, innovation, technological progress and a booming economy. He is a stupid man who inherited money and then learned to grift and con. We do not want our kids to acquire those skills, but to learn how to accomplish real and lasting contributions to our nation's success (and their own) through effort and knowledge, not branding and lying.

      Somerby has been anti-intellectual and anti-expertise just like Trump and others in his kakistocracy. They think they can appoint unqualified people to high positions and fake their way through crises. So we have a screw up like the El Paso use of anti-drone tech against party balloons, and DOJ prosecutors who can't get a grand jury to bring indictments, and other screw ups due to lack of expertise. Trump is the screw up in chief.

      That Somerby does not link our govts failures to lack of expertise shows that he does not understand what education is for. Neither does 10:56. First, kids can't learn a trade if they can't read or write or do math. Second, kids in manual labor jobs can't afford to buy Oura rings or other high tech goodies, because they can't even afford rent, much less buy a house. Third, the people who consider "woke" worse than illiteracy don't know what it takes to create a satisfying life, without lying, cheating and stealing.

      The connection between lack of education is most visible among prison inmates. They take shortcuts via crime because they can't succeed any other way, but being stupid and uneducated, they get caught and wind up as wards of the state. Now imagine more of our population unable to succeed at work and thus being imprisoned at public expense. That is where we are headed after Trump and his cronies destroy public education.

      Delete
    2. If you don't measure school performance using something like the NAEP nationwide testing program, then you have no idea how well our nation's kids are being prepared for jobs and full participation in our democracy.

      Trump said he won the highly educated, but stats show that Democrats are more highly educated than Republicans. Trump said he won the poorly educated. He then repeated that he loved the poorly educated voters. And then he said "we're the smartest people" to his followers. Trump himself believes he is smart because he has good genes (no actual education needed) but he cannot find countries on a map and he believes bizarre things about magnets and sharks. He is not a smart man, according to those who have met him and worked with him, and he is certainly not an educated man. So, what is he? He was born a very rich man, he has no shame and no scruples, some call him a sociopath, and he has accepted help from mobsters and Russian oligarchs, who groomed him for the presidency. Since winning, he has been their puppet. The isn't smart.

      Autocrats love an uneducated populace because they are easier to manipulate. When we prepared students for adult life via education, we protect them from many of the risks they will encounter. Teachers believe in doing this. Grifters like Trump and Somerby think education itself is a con. Today, Somerby carries water for Trump by undermining the idea of educational achievement in MS, furthering the idea that black kids can't learn and that teachers are frauds. He thoughtfully adds, that he can't say for sure this is true, but he also can't say it isn't true. Furthering the idea that there is no truth and no one can know what is what. Because that justifies ignorance, avoiding any attempt to know anything.

      Delete
    3. 10:56,
      Youn seem to know an awful lot.
      Why, in your opinion, do Republicans like to rape children so much?
      My Democrat friends say it's because no adult woman would be caught dead having sexual relations with them, but they also think every Republican voter is a bigot, because they listened to them when Somerby told them to.

      Delete
    4. My white Republican friends all say they are not bigots, they just don't like the ones that "act" like niggers.

      Delete
    5. "My white Republican friends..."
      You need an Editor.
      The term "white" is superfluous in a sentence about Republicans.

      Delete
    6. The lyrics to You're So Vain (Carly Simon) say it all:

      You don't like weak women, you get bored so quick,
      And you don't like strong women, cause they're hip to your tricks...

      I find it bizarre that Epstein surrounded himself with scientists and high tech guys, intellectuals like Chomsky and Pinker, to make himself feel smart by association. But then he hung out with high school girls who giggle and are immature and silly and ignorant (compared to adult women) and can't possibly be interesting to talk to. There are almost no adult women among Epstein's intellectual dinners and "conferences" because his world is split into men as clients and ego-boosting bros and women as sex objects valued for being naive and easy to manipulate, compliant. Maxwell is his accomplice but also seems to be a girlfriend/wife/beard surrogate. Or maybe she provided validation and admiration that Epstein wouldn't get from scared and hurt teens.

      Guys like Fuentes want to turn all men into Epsteins. In the polygamous cults that exploit women, such guys have a dominance hierarchy based on their ownership of women and girls. Young boys are pushed out by the patriarch when they are sexually mature enough to compete with the older men, sort of like a pride of animals. See "Keep Sweet: Pray and Obey" for an example of how this works. Epstein didn't want the work of maintaining a cult compound and didn't have the religious justification, so he used a criminal model of prostitution and was a trafficker instead. No raising of girl babies and children for him, no working businesses or rural compound to support the members. Instead, he grifted off of male clients, using blackmail and influence peddling to make himself wealthy (no other male competitors for his wealth acquired by pimping out children).

      Fuentes, incels and bro culture want the easy access to admiring women without the work or effort of making themselves competitive or desirable as mates. Women do the work while they reap the rewards, in their system, because male superiority and the need to replenish white population justify their personal benefit. They want to compell women to do this sexual work by depriving them of the right to say no, and limiting women's other options. And women will also take care of home and children. While men profit from technology and perhaps subjugating men and women of color as slaves. (They don't talk about that part except among themselves.)

      This isn't going to happen. None of it. Fuentes is grifting off sexually incompetent men with this fantasy of free women as sex slaves and domestic workers, much the way Epstein did with pedophile fantasies of naive sex with admiring children without the tiresome effort of grooming them.

      Delete
  2. Trump paid to have someone take his tests for him, enabling him to claim that he graduated from some top schools. Does that discredit those schools or our education system in general?

    Here are some things that Somerby neglects to mention. The Department of Education, which administers the NAEP nationwide, has been disbanded by Trump's administration. In general, cheating in schools occurs under two conditions: (1) students do not feel they can succeed with reasonable effort, (2) high stakes are tied to success. During the cheating scandals Somerby refers to, school districts were being funded according to formulas that tied student progress to school funding, and teachers were being evaluated based on "value added" formulas that linked their pay to student improvement. Unfortunately, neither districts nor teachers have all of the influences on student performance under their control. That meant they were being held accountable for things they could not influence, including student family income (strongly associated with student performance) and means of improving student success in their classrooms (dictated by administrators not teachers). So, you have a situation where teacher pay and district funding are based on student test scores but teachers and districts did not have control over improving student performance. Those are exactly the circumstances under which student cheat, so it should be no surprise that some districts would cheat too, because people are people.

    Teacher who are reasonably well trained (as Somerby was not), are taught how to prevent cheating and eliminate the conditions that made students desperate enough to attempt it. It is part of good teaching to do that. Somerby's model is to blame the profession and our educational institutions. He appears to have been horribly disillusioned by the scandals of the 1970s & 1980s, but as he notes, these did not involve NAEP, and in fact had nothing to do with NAEP. NAEP does not report individualized results for specific students and it is not tied to district funding. It is a measure of educational progress nationwide and no one cares enough about those results to cheat on the test. But Somerby has an ulterior motive -- to suggest that reading improvement in MS is bunk and that schools in generally are crapping and unreliable.

    It is very odd that a man who spent 10-12 years teaching (depending on which bio you believe) would have no little faith in the ability of schools to help children acquire knowledge. Yet Somerby never misses an opportunity to attack education, from K through college. I am daily thankful that Somerby left teaching. I only wonder about the circumstances that caused him to finally pull the plug and become a comedian instead of an educator. The usual tenure of a new, poorly trained teacher is about 3 years and most such teachers do leave before the 10 year mark. I tend to believe Somerby when he says he stayed to avoid the draft, given that the Vietnam war ended about the time he quit teaching. But I also think his suspicion of the teaching establishment may have prevented him from learning how to teach well, leading him to assume that all teachers were as bad as he was, working with the most difficult students (inner city black kids from poor families and lacking educational resources in the home). He was apparently indoctrinated by Teach for America, believed that experienced educators had nothing to teach him, used dubious approaches (some of which he has described here), and was unable to produce miracles of any kind. So he gave up on the teaching profession, his kids and himself. Too many people give up on poor black kids but Somerby used to claim that he was the only one who cared about them. That is as ridiculous as today's screed.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Education is going through some rough times today. Covid was devastating to students and teachers. Now the attack by Trump on public education is doing more damage. Somerby could have written about that, but has chosen not to. Attempting to shift to use of technology in the classroom is not going to work any better now, than in the past, and we are entering a time of upheaval with AI that will affect student job prospects. Teachers know that human interaction is needed for learning but those inventing new machines think kids can learn from screens. That didn't work when TV was introduced into classrooms, nor did it work with learning machines or laptops, and AI is not going to help either, no matter how great the appeal of cost-reducing measures.

      These are difficult times. What Somerby is doing here by attacking MS's investment in reading, will hurt, not help, students and their families.

      Delete
  3. Men don't like women because women do better than them in school, even in math. Women have to be confined by restrictive social rules that benefit the patriarchy, because otherwise they would dominate men and men are afraid of that. So they limit the competition.

    Meanwhile, here is Nick Fuentes (a neo-Nazi friend of Trump) who is very concerned about declining birthrates among white people:

    “...the number one political enemy is women. straight up, I’m telling it like it is. people might say it’s Jews, it’s Democrats, it’s white liberals, it’s leftists, it’s the Chinese. our number one political enemy is women. because woman constrain everything. every conversation, every man, everything. they have to be imprisoned. they are the ones that are hurting the fertility rate, they are the ones making us sympathetic to poor people — which are also brown people.” [Tiedrich]

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Black Dick,
      Fuentes and the Republican Party are deathly afraid of you for some reason.

      Delete
    2. He's here to steal your white women.

      Delete
    3. Men do better on objective standardized math, physics, logical reasoning, and analytical reasoning tests. And we have larger brains.

      Delete
  4. David R. Lurie at American Prospect says:

    "We are all passengers in Trump’s death cab, The nihilism of the regime is its most terrifying attribute."

    He then lists the destruction of America's strengths under Trump and his apparent lack of concern about it.

    https://www.publicnotice.co/p/trump-polling

    Lurie doesn't mention education but it should be on his list.

    One of my ongoing grudges against Somerby is his own nihilism. His lack of caring about any of the things that are important and valuable about our nation, our strengths, and his willingness to follow Trump and the right in their destruction of both material and abstract positive attributes of our nation. Somerby's doom and gloom moaning over the death of democracy, our lack of virtue as human beings, our "earning our way out" when trying to enact positives on the left, and never mentioning the stench, corruption and filth of our Dear Leader, any of his many screwups, his incompetent staff installed in every important office and the way Trump exhibits evil traits (not just delusions and personality defects). Somerby ignores all that is bad and wrong with Trump's administration, the right that fails to hold Trump accountable, in order to attack the press (mostly on the left) while repeating Gutfeld's worst jokes. None of this makes any sense except as support for Trump, since Somerby simultaneously attacks remaining good in our country.

    Somerby would be driving Trump's death cab, if they offered him the job. Look at what he has written today about reading improvement in MS. He doesn't know whether it is real, but there has been educational cheating in other circumstances, but he can't say it isn't real, he just doubts all over it, like Trump farting through a cabinet meeting. Because education isn't really working, he says, so MS is probably lying and cheating, even if he can't prove it. Because that's what teachers do.

    Gosh, how would it benefit Somerby's ego to believe that no one can teach poor black kids and the ones who make some progress must be cheating?

    ReplyDelete
  5. I watched an Olympics-related movie on Prime yesterday, Raising the Bar: The Alma Richards Story. It was about a young Mormon farmer who won a gold medal in high jumping at the 1912 Stockholm Olympics. It shows how he dropped out in 8th grade to be a ranch hand, met a college professor accidentally at a hotel who convinced him to figure out what his "calling" in life was, which caused him to return to high school. There, he was recruited by the track and field coach and discovered his athletic ability. He went from there to BYU's prep school where he was bullied by other students (for being big and stupid) but went on to try out for the Olympic team at the urging of his coach. He again was bullied by the team members and that undermined his ability to do his best, until he was encouraged by Jim Thorpe (also on the team) and overcame his concern over what other people thought about him.

    What the film doesn't show is that he continued in the sport by attending college, obtained a degree and ultimately a law degree, but chose to teach school in Venice High School, CA for 30+ years, because he believed it was important to give to others, and vanity to pursue fame and accolades in the form of awards.

    The desire to be of service motivates most teachers. Not Somerby, since he was motivated to avoid the draft and avoided acquiring skills to be useful to his students. Someone who denigrates the efforts of others is not suited to teaching because it undermines confidence and does nothing to encourage perseverance. Somerby exemplifies the bullies who taunted Richards, to bring him down even after they themselves washed out of the competition. Alma (a name with religious significance) Richards taught science. His own school experiences no doubt gave him empathy for the struggles of his students with difficult subject matter. Teaching is always about motivating students, not just conveying information.

    ReplyDelete
  6. This problem would not exist in a stand-alone school. An isolated school on Laura Ingalls Wilder's prairie would simply teach children the best they could. They'd use personal observation of each individual student. If they used tests, they'd have no reason to cheat.

    The problem arises when some more remote organization is telling schools how to teach or measuring how well they teach. They don't see an individual student's progress, or lack of progress, year by hear. They have to depend on tests. Tests provide a very limited picture of a whole individual. And, as Bob points out, tests can be finagled.

    There are now so many state, federal, and university "experts" telling teachers how to teach. They think they're improving education. Maybe they're making it worse.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Fuck off stupid troll.

      Delete
    2. I've met people in grad school who attended one-room schools. Their teachers were generalists not specialists. If there were a child in such a school who had difficulty learning to read, there would be no school reading specialist to help them. The classroom teaching would be motivated and well meaning but wouldn't have the knowledge to try other approaches and wouldn't have the time to work one-on-one with that child. It would be back to the kind of situation that wasn't working for MS. So, the problem arises when the needs of the kids exceed the resources of that stand-alone school.

      The role of the Dept of Education is poorly understood, judging by David's beliefs about it. It was created to help deal with special needs kids, and to share best practices across schools and among teachers, and it was to provide resources unavailable to rural, isolated, underfunded and overwhelmed school districts. The Dept of Education measures state school effectiveness, not individual schools much less students. Someone has to take a wider view of how our nation's schools are doing as a whole. Parents and teachers and local principals deal with individual children's needs. We need both, not one or the other.

      Somerby also points out that there is no evidence whatsoever that the NAEP has ever been "finagled" partly because there is no reward for doing better on it and thus no motive to cheat.

      David also does not understand that no curriculum is being imposed on schools. No one is telling local schools how or what to teach. The do provide guidance on curriculum and standards for their own tests (which schools can accept or decline). Materials are developed by publishers and sold to school districts who adopt them after a process of community and teacher and administrative review.

      Professors of Education do research on different approaches to teaching. They then publish papers and provide their findings to databases maintained at the federal level, but they do not TELL anyone what to do, how or what to teach. They tell people the results of their studies and schools and material publishers make their own decisions.

      I am very tired of this old trope about schools being told by anyone how and what to teach. Principals tell teachers but their guidelines come from districts and community members, under local control, not from feds. Fed set guidelines such as that every disabled child is entitled to an education and the support and help needed to learn. That is a law and a value, not dictating, and it comes from courts not "experts".

      Those schools on the prairie used to run ads to recruit the best teachers they could afford. The city took up a collection (taxed businesses and student families) to pay the teachers. When the towns got larger, so did the schools because there were more kids. Having an isolated school in a big city is now the model for some private schools. But those don't succeed if the conditions are not right, with rich people to fund them, given that microscopes and athletic fields cost more money than a little school on the prairie could afford, even if they were large enough to field an actual team.

      Delete
    3. David has no idea what he is talking about. Neither do the right wing activists who wish to co-opt education in service of right wing propaganda (the very thing they accuse the left of doing, when it does not). MS is doing better because it invested effort in overcoming the legacy of segregated education, in which black kids had no schools to attend locally, resources were funneled to white schools, and no one cared whether black kids learned anything, except when it came time for them to function as adults and get jobs, make good choices and avoid crime. There is a direct connection between lack of education and poverty and crime. In that little house on the prairie, a cattle rustler would be strung up by a posse, but if you have a large city with laws and police, you need to prevent crime, not murder strangers.

      David is mistaking his own ignorance for "common sense". I'll bet he never read a Laura Ingalls book but only watched the TV show. And he clearly knows nothing at all about how modern schools work.

      Delete
    4. “I love the poorly educated”, Donald Trump

      Delete
    5. At the college level, professors pick their textbooks. They are hired because they have the expertise to do that. At community colleges and in places where there are adjunct faculty, the department may require the use of certain textbooks so that all temporary and part-time faculty are using the same book in introductory courses with many sections. In that case, the tenure-track faculty who teach that course decide which books everyone teaching that course will use. There is no situation in which the administration or the state govt or federal Dept of Education decides what books and materials will be used. This is called Freedom of Education, but it belongs to the teachers, not the students or school administrators. Non-tenured and non-tenure track faculty do not have the same rights as tenured faculty do. Attacks on the existence of tenure at the university level (and among high schools with tenure rights) try to limit the power and authority of educated teachers in order to empower administrators. The right has gone along with attacks on tenure systems that seemingly protect against the very abuses David says he fears.

      Somerby used to write essays disputing the existence of expertise and knowledge conferred by higher education. His argument is that no one knows anything, not Einstein, not Godel (because he had dementia at the end of his life) so privileging those with more education is elitist, especially when Democrats do it to ignorant red voters. He has wanted to place all opinions on an equal footing, none more right or more wrong than others, even in the face of research and knowledge about stuff like whether vaccines work, how children learn, or who is best qualified to hold which offices.

      Given the way Trump has been governing in this second term, Somerby now has the kind of administration he has always wanted. One in which people with experience, skill, expertise were all fired and morons loyal to Dear Leader were installed.

      Our DHS cabinet member (who reports to Stephen Miller not Trump, because she is a girl) abolished FEMA and flies around in a jet with her adulterous lover Corey in their private cabin at the back of the plane so they won't be disturbed, visiting places soon to be under martial law, while her ICE thugs shoot citizens and break the law at will. It doesn't take smarts or education to run a dept that way.

      This is where arguing that everyone's opinions carry equal weight regardless of evidence and argument, gets you. Only Trump's ideas matter and everyone else isn't even trying to do a serious job, except Miller who wants to reinvent Der Fuhrer's Reich on American soil.

      Delete
    6. Textbooks for elhi schools in CA are selected by a statewide body. As a practical matter, public school generally use textbooks approved by this body. In fact, I have a vague memory that there's a difference in financial support if a school uses an unapproved textbook.

      Because CA is so large, the textbook publisher give CA what it wants. Then they promote those same textbooks to other states. So, this single body wields a great deal of power over what textbooks are used in the classroom.

      My late friend, Larry, a Professor of Physics, worked as a reviewer of textbooks. He was harshly critical of the textbooks and harshly critical of the process by which they were written and selected.

      Delete
    7. David in Cal's girlfriend lives in Canada. You wouldn't know her.

      Delete

    8. You're right, obviously: parents and local people should be able to decide how to educate their children.

      "It takes a village", as one wicked witch once titled her book. A village, not a whole country of 350 million people.

      Delete
    9. Is it your complaint that CA gets to select its own textbooks? How is that the feds or Dept of Education selecting them if the state is doing it? Why is it bad that the state is large enough to get what it wants from publishers? That is local control.

      Your friend Larry sounds pretty negative. Why do you assume he was right about his criticisms, when you are not a physicist or a high school teacher? Do you assume he was the only reviewer? I'm sure he wasn't. Some other professor of physics probably wrote the textbook draft, so they can duke it out. College professors get paid by publishers to review their new drafts, so I'm sure Larry appreciated the extra income. But perhaps he misunderstood his role in the process or misjudged the audience (16-18 year olds with variable exposure to science depending on what their middle schools were like). Here we see the value in state standards for science teaching in lower grades, so that content of more advanced texts can assume some foundational knowledge.

      The purpose of a review is to identify both strengths and weaknesses and to correct errors, but there is a state-of-the-art in writing textbooks that Larry may not understand, despite his background in physics. This is why it was important for Somerby to take some teacher ed classes and receive pedagogical training, because knowledge of Plato just isn't enough to teach 3rd grade reading to inner city black kids.

      Somerby is highly negative when MS gets serious about teaching reading and shows progress on an independent test. I don't understand Larry's negativity about reviewing a textbook. His comments are supposed to improve the draft, so why is he upset that they are trying to make the book better by seeking comments and correction of errors? Why would that be bad?

      Do Republicans think all such comment and review processes are bad? Is that why they don't want to let the public comment on proposed rules and regulations for legislation? I don't get David's objections.

      As to having state textbooks, what if every school had to do all the work of reviewing and selecting textbooks for themselves. What a waste of effort to have such redundancy over physics or math or English that should be taught consistently so that employers can hire graduating students with the same expectations of what they will know?

      Delete
    10. In fact, I have a vague memory that there's a difference in financial support if a school uses an unapproved textbook.

      Translation: dickhead just pulled this out of his ass

      When I was growing up, it was white Christian nationalists in Texas who decided what textbooks I would be using. Nowadays I think it is Ron Desanctimonious

      Delete
    11. I agree with David that physics textbooks should be selected by physicists and teachers, not religious cranks.

      In CA, there was a lawsuit brought against the state because state universities (UCLA, UC Berkeley etc) would not admit students from religious schools that did not teach evolution in their science curriculum. Evolution is the dominant theoretical paradigm throughout biology and fields like psychology. A student without any exposure to its ideas will be unprepared to study life sciences, the state argued. The state university system refused to admit students who would be likely to fail and did not want to bear the costs of remediation for underprepared students. The state won its lawsuit and religious students were not admitted, just as students without basic math and English courses were not admitted. Some religious schools changed and others didn't. Students coming from such schools typically took remedial classes in community college before applying to a UC campus.

      In Florida and TX, parents can bring suits arguing that their children are not being properly prepared for college by public schools forbidding what is normal curriculum in the rest of the nation. CA has precedent for lawsuits by parents claiming that their kids are being neglected by public schools.

      Delete
  7. Trump's outright disdain for Republican voters is something all great Americans should emulate.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Who could have guessed?

    Acting ICE director Todd Lyons says newly reviewed video evidence contradicts officers' sworn testimony about January confrontation

    Two Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) officers are under criminal investigation after federal prosecutors moved to dismiss felony assault charges stemming from a January shooting in Minneapolis.

    ICE Director Todd Lyons said Friday that newly reviewed video evidence suggests the officers may have made "untruthful statements" under oath about the Jan. 14 confrontation, during which a Venezuelan national was shot, The Associated Press reported.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. What is it about "illegal" that they don't understand?

      Delete
    2. What these agents did is horrible. I hope they get appropriate punishment. They should certainly not be ICE agents.

      IMO there's too much pessimism in the country. I see gloom and despair. That's because the media focuses on bad news. Look at the enormous drop in murder violent crimes. Yet, thousands more people are alive and well than had last year's rates repeated. Prosperity is increasing. We're not at war. It's one thing to worry about Trump's doings, but that should not people from appreciating that things are pretty darn good in the country right now.

      Delete
    3. David seems to be saying that we shouldn't care about anyone but ourselves, because it harshes our vibe.

      David is alive and well and he assumes everyone reading his comment is too. But what if they aren't sitting here contemplating the fact that they weren't murdered, but instead wondering how they are going to get out of ICE jail?

      Delete
    4. Go take a flying fuck, dickhead, you fucking fascist freak

      Delete
    5. @4:06 / you are the one who appears not to care about other people. The country is at peace. Real income is rising. Violent crime is way down. The average American is living as good as better life today than at any time in history. But you don’t care enough about them to notice.

      The improvement in quality of life is particularly big for inner city blacks, where the murder rate is highest. These people especially benefit from the big drop in murders.

      Delete
    6. Here's an analogy, @4:06. Suppose someone claimed to be a fan of the Seattle Seahawks, but this person didn't know that the Seahawks had won the Super Bowl. One would conclude that this person doesn't really care that much about the Seahawks.

      Similarly, we can conclude that a person who doesn't know how much the inner city murder rate dropped doesn't really care that much about inner city residents.

      Delete
  9. This so is dead-on:

    https://x.com/antspeaks/status/2022333509931544847?s=46&t=oYvKLjVc8YzJIvwKoQTYBQ

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. https://www.tripadvisor.com/Restaurants-g294212-c7-Beijing.html

      Delete
    2. Cecelia is a walking illustration that xenophobia is based on ignorance.

      Delete
    3. If he's a comedian, shouldn't he be a tiny bit funny?

      Delete
    4. No, he isn’t. The Tripadvisor link to British restaurants in China shows that.

      Delete
    5. Trannysorostroll has got to go. Fucking weirdo.

      Delete
    6. Do you live in Britain, Cecelia? Here in the US we treat the immigrant scum the right way: we put them in concentration camps!

      Delete
    7. Ilya - you know very well that we treat the legal immigrants just fine. There are a million each year.

      The detention camps are an untended consequence of our civil liberties. If ICE had the power to just deport any illegal immigrant they caught, there would be no need for Allegator Alcatraz. But, every illegal immigrant is each entitled to a hearing. Thanks to Biden and Mayorkas our system is overloaded. That results in big backlog waiting for hearings.

      Delete
  10. Somerby says "Eighth graders bypass Lourdes."

    "Lourdes miracles refer to the 71 officially recognized, scientifically unexplained medical cures occurring at the Sanctuary of Our Lady of Lourdes in France, where millions pilgrimage annually. "

    Why the snide remark about MS kids who are reading as well as in MA, especially the black kids? It is derogatory to think that black kids cannot learn to read without some miracle.

    The real miracle is that State legislators in MS got tired of always being at the bottom of lists by state and deciding to do something constructive about it. They allocated the funds for resources and mandated that MS improve reading instruction for their kids, all of them. I am impressed that they did this and follow through to the point where it made a visible difference, instead of abandoning the project after an initial publicized announcement (which would make it a political stunt). They gave educators what they needed to produce improvement and their education establishment came through. Seeing their progress, other states are saying "If MS can do it, why not us?" They realized in MS that the knowledge to teach more effectively existed, but they were lacking the will to change. Then they rolled up their sleeves and implemented the necessary changes to do better.

    Somerby is unwilling to give them any credit for their achievement. He gripes about "miracles" and ignores the hard work involved -- that there was no miracle involved, just the determination to help ALL of their kids learn to read. That means they had to abaondon racist explanations and stop tolerating substandard funding and resources at predominantly black schools. Maybe that is why Somerby is so derisive. It is otherwise hard to see why he begrudges MS their kudos.

    ReplyDelete
  11. If it's not the fucking corruption, it's the fucking lawlessness:
    "Two former federal prosecutors with nearly forty years’ combined experience in this District recently framed these mounting concerns about the grand jury process well, saying:

    Unfortunately, recent actions by the DOJ demonstrate that the DOJ is wrongfully using the grand jury as a tool in its campaign of retribution and intimidation. We are particularly concerned about reports that federal prosecutors may be intentionally misrepresenting the correct legal standards and circumventing legal procedures, stripping the grand jury of its deliberative function . . . The American public must have confidence that the grand jury remains an independent body of citizens, not an “illegitimate” extension of the executive branch, seeking to gloss over unconstitutional actions by government actors. It is the duty of any person summoned to serve on a grand jury to preserve the grand jury’s independence by applying the law, not rubber-stamping government overreach.21

    21 John Marti & Hank Shea, The last line of defense: We the people as a check on government power, Minn. Star Trib. (Feb. 10, 2026), https://www.startribune.com/constitution-democracy-founding-fathers-governmentamendment-jury/601579837."

    ReplyDelete
  12. Blacks do not have the aptitudes of whites in reading and math, never will, and decrying their lower scores is the most racist thing anyone can do.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Deciding what someone can do using skin color instead of performance is racist.

      Delete
    2. Why does Somerby attract these racist trolls?

      Delete
    3. They do get high scores on eating fried chicken and watermelon.

      Delete