MONDAY, FEBRUARY 23, 2026
Grant sits down with Lee: The far-flung state of the disunion had held through the rest of the weekend.
How widespread is the current (dis)union? For one example, consider the dueling approaches adopted by different arms of This Murdoch Empire Today.
The state of disunion remains so strong that major arms of that powerful empire can't even agree with each other! Late last Friday afternoon, even as The Five were happily clowning, the Wall Street Journal editorial board was already in print saying this:
Trump Demeans Himself as He Attacks the Supreme Court
President Trump owes the Supreme Court an apology—to the individual Justices he smeared on Friday and the institution itself. Mr. Trump doubtless won’t offer one, but his rant in response to his tariff defeat at the Court was arguably the worst moment of his Presidency.
Granted Mr. Trump is angry that the Court voted 6-3 to overturn his signature “emergency” tariff policy. Other Presidents have criticized the Court when they didn’t like a ruling. But Mr. Trump lit into the Justices who voted against him as traitors bought by foreign interests.
[...]
He called the liberals a “disgrace to our nation.” But he heaped particular vitriol on the three conservatives. They “think they’re being ‘politically correct,’ which has happened before, far too often, with certain members of this Court,” Mr. Trump said. “When, in fact, they’re just being fools and lapdogs for the RINOs and the radical left Democrats—and . . . they’re very unpatriotic and disloyal to our Constitution. It’s my opinion that the Court has been swayed by foreign interests.”
This is ugly even by Mr. Trump’s standards...
And so on from there.
So spoke the Journal wing of the Murdoch empire. But over on the Fox News Channel, a vastly different story was being told.
By Saturday evening, the greatness of the president's brilliance was being clumsily affirmed by the four messenger children on the Fox News Channel's so-called Big Weekend Show.
At 5 p.m., the children opened the show with a trademark non-discussion discussion of the Court's ruling, and on where things go from there.
By 5:04, new co-host Tomi Lahren was reporting that Democrats oppose the tariffs because they refuse to "root for the United States of America against the rest of the world."
(Referring to Republicans who oppose the tariffs, she said this: "I can actually see your point.")
So said co-host Lahren. At 5:09, new co-host Johnny Joey Jones managed to bring it all home. We're cutting this down a bit for purposes of clarity, but here's what Lahren's co-host said, seeming to be speaking of the Dems:
JONES (2/21/26): I can't help but laugh at Josh Shapiro...
You know, they play this game that's— They're not very good at it, I don't think.
President Trump is smarter than they are. He's playing checkers, they're playing— Or, he's playing chess, they're playing checkers.
President Trump has been playing chess; the Democrats are playing checkers! After an initial stumble, that's what the co-host said.
(Co-host Lahren hotly continued, moving again to assessments of motive. "Why don't you want America to win for once?" she hotly asked, addressing the Democrats. "They just can't do it," she now heatedly said.)
In short, the state of the (dis)union was strong, even within these high-profile arms of The Murdoch Empire. But then, dear God! Here came (the tiniest hint of) the sun! We suddenly flashed on sacred Keats in one of his most famous poems!
All of a sudden, here came a hint of the sun! Last evening, on that same Big Weekend Show, an extremely rare event took place.
It happened during the 6 o'clock hour. Breaking every rule in the modern "two Americas" book, co-host Jones shocked the world, suddenly saying this:
JONES (2/22/26): Joining us now is Congressman Ro Khanna, a member of the House Armed Services and House Oversight Committees.
Congressman, thank you for joining us. We don't get a lot of Democrats on here, wo when we do, we want to treat you with respect.
Say what? Ro Khanna, a very high-profile figure on Blue America's cable news channel, was appearing as a guest on The Big Weekend Show! A nine-minute segment followed, principally focused on two topics—the so-called SAVE Act. but also the current partial government shutdown.
Alas! We'd say that Khanna's performance was amazingly poor; Jones' attempt to show respect may have been marginally worse. So it goes when warring parties make a halting first step at interacting in the public square again.
Khanna was disappointingly bad; Jones may have been worse. Still, we pray that such meetings will take place again and again and again. The participants made that very suggestion as the segment ended.
Tomorrow, we'll walk you through what was said during the segment in question. The fellow citizens even shared a bit of a laugh at one encouraging point!
(To watch the full segment, click this.)
Tomorrow night, the president is going to speak—and the ongoing state of disunion is likely to be strong. The Justices are scheduled to be sitting with the soul of the late Bob Uecker, right there in the front row!
Tomorrow: Generals Grant and Lee engage in a halting first step
Keats speaks: Briefly, we flashed on sacred Keats. Long ago and far away, here's what the gentleman said
On First Looking into Chapman's Homer
[...]
Then felt I like some watcher of the skies
When a new planet swims into his ken;
Or like stout Cortez when with eagle eyes
He star'd at the Pacific—and all his men
Look'd at each other with a wild surmise—
Silent, upon a peak in Darien.
No, it wasn't really that good. But it seemed like a halting first step!
ReplyDelete"Trump Demeans Himself as He Attacks the Supreme Court"
Boo-hoo! Squeal, squeal, retarded Democrats!
Thank you for draining the globalist swamp, Mr. President; please continue draining the swamp!
@9:56 is confused. It is Trump who is squealing.
DeleteThe 6 year old troll got his cookie again!
DeleteI think sacred Keats was disappointingly bad.
ReplyDeleteFor one thing Keats has nothing to do with Grant or Lee. And why would he flash into Somerby's head like that? Keats is describing explorers first viewing a new place while Lee and Grant met to end a war and Ro Khanna was just trying to educate a new audience. And why should it be a struggle for anyone to show respect?
Somerby can't just watch a show on its own terms and make sense of it in the context of what is actually happening. He has to put some fatuous gloss on it that distorts and confuses, thus proving he has no clue what is happening. Then he pretends literacy by grabbing a poem without concern for what it means.
Somerby has no coherent thoughts for anyone today. Except he got his dig in, on a Democrat (Ro Khanna):
"Ro Khanna is a Democratic Party U.S. Representative for California's 17th Congressional District (Silicon Valley), holding office since 2017. A prominent progressive, he focuses on technology, manufacturing, and climate policy. Khanna serves on the House Oversight and Armed Services committees and is considered a potential 2028 presidential contender."
Somerby has said nothing much about him until now. But he starts right off telling us how disappointing Khanna was. Twice he says it. And he promises to tell us again tomorrow. That is the way to get Democrats elected! Talk about how bad they are, over and over, without any evidence or reasons but with plenty of repetition. Somerby doesn't disappoint, if you are trying to put another Republican into the presidency in 2028 that is.
It's not fair to say Democrats oppose the tariffs because they refuse to root for the United States of America against the rest of the world. But, it is fair is to say Dems oppose anything Trump supports regardless of whether it's good or bad for the United States. E.g., Trump wants laws to help make sure elections are honest. So, Dems are support making it harder to prevent electoral dishonesty.. Trump wants to get foreign criminals off the streets. So, Dems want to allow foreign criminals out on the streets. Trump is pursuing peace in Ukraine, so Dems support continuing the war in Ukraine.
ReplyDeleteFor some fucking reason it seems Wall St has no confidence in a fucking lunatic madman president. Go figure.
Delete
DeleteNo, I don't think so, David. The Democrat party is a tool of globalists, and the globalists have good reasons for replacing domestic workers with illegal aliens, for rigging elections, and for massive endless wars.
Uh, @10:46, the Dow is up 32% in the last 12 months.
DeleteNice try. Trump and the right wing have been hoisting their petard for years now over "honest and fair elections". With zero evidence, despite extensive study by any entity, including Republican, that improper voting has any but a miniscule part. ( See the election integrity panel that Trump assembled in 2016 as a comical example). And likewise no evidence that the Democratic candidate is favored by those one in millions improper votes. The biggest threat to democracy in this country is posed by a demented clown who has already tried to overturn an election. Your dishonest posting with phoney concerns about election integrity, in the face of this history, is deplorable.
Deleteyou're a fucking LIAR, dickhead. 32% over 12 months? are you out of your fucking mind. life must be very dark for you living up trump's ass
DeleteThe closing price for the Dow Jones Industrial Average (DJI) on February 21, 2025 was $43,428.02. It was down 0.9% for the day. The latest price is $49,625.97.
@11:00 - Even if a financial institution has never been robbed, it makes every effort to thwart potential thieves and embezzlers. It knows that there are people who would steal money if they thought they could get away with it.
DeleteElections are more important than ever. Some people here say they would murder Trump if they could get away with it! Given that level of passion, some people would surely commit election fraud to help defeat a candidate they oppose. Vigilance is appropriate.
You got me @11:10. I misread the chart. Actually the Dow is up 12% in the last 12 months. That's fine, but not exceptional.
Deleteright, I forgot, you're the numbers guy, dickhead, you fucking fascist freak
Delete"Some people here say they would murder Trump if they could get away with it!"
DeleteWho said that, dickhead?
take a look at the market reaction to orange chickenshit's meltdown on Friday in reaction to the SC tariff decision, dickhead
Delete"Trump wants laws to help make sure elections are honest."
DeleteIn the same way Al Capone wanted laws to make sure banks were secure.
@11:19 - How about you? If a time machine put you back to last November and you had a chance to vote illegally against Trump, with no risk of being caught, would you do it?
Deleteright, dickhead in cal, the guy who tried to steal an election wants to count the votes next time. Who the fuck do you think you're kidding?
DeleteSo, dickhead in cal, you just want to skip right over this fucking accusation you just made?
Delete"Some people here say they would murder Trump if they could get away with it!"
you are a depraved indecent piece of shity
Let's have you and Trump test your theory, David in Cal.
DeleteLet Trump make a speech supporting government reparations for slavery to black people, and we'll see two things.
One, if Democrats refuse to support anything Trump supports, and two, if Republican voters are in a cult and will support anything Trump does.
You know the Epstein Files are getting to the Republican Party, when David in Cal has posts on TDH supporting the public having more say on how a business is run, than the company's owners, board members, and executive team.
DeleteThere's no distraction from the Epstein Files that is too out there to be posted on the internet.
David in Cal,
DeleteIn your expert opinion, why do you think I keep getting banned from Right-wing blogs for posting that Trump has been the best President for black people in the history of the country?
@12:18 - I will pass your suggestion on to Trump next time I see him
Delete"Even if a financial institution has never been robbed, it makes every effort to thwart potential thieves and embezzlers. It knows that there are people who would steal money if they thought they could get away with it.
Delete11:10,
Your argument for more government oversight, and robust SEC and IRS investigation and enforcement arms is intriguing.
I would like to sign-up for your newsletter.
12:38,
DeleteWhen is the next Klan rally scheduled?
Wasn't David in Cal's argument yesterday, that banks should be forced to allow potential thieves and embezzlers to be their customers?
DeleteIt's almost like David in Cal doesn't really believe in anything he posts except the bigotry, without the "It's almost like" part, of course.
The “retired actuary” can’t even read a simple chart. Pathetic.
DeleteThe worse the midterms look for them, the more republicans will try to exclude voters they think will not support them. Closing polling sites, creating long lines in democratic districts, especially those that are mixed race, voter id requirements less likely to be obtainable by inner city and low wage citizens, etc. All for the purpose of excluding voters and with zero data to show that there is significant voter fraud in this country. It is as anti-American as a supporter of the clown who tried to overturn and election.
DeleteI take my 12:52 comment back. More likely, as usual, that DiC is a lying foreign troll.
DeleteYes. 11:10 - government regulation of insurance companies is essential. Companies take in premiums with a promise to pay claims later. The government has to make sure that they have adequate assets to pay these claims. Corporate financial results have to be regulated, so that investors will know a corporation's actual earnings and net worth. These types of regulation are generally done well.
DeleteUnfortunately there are also burdensome regulations that are useless.
Even if a financial institution has never been robbed, it makes every effort to thwart potential thieves and embezzlers.
DeleteDavid: Your knack for starting from a false predicate is beyond impressive -- it's uncanny! Elections are secure. Elections have been secure. The most notable irregularity was a GOP apparatchik in North Carolina rigging a congressional election.
The number of non-citizens voting is less than negligible, like maybe 1 in a million votes -- that's based on a study by Cato institute. Most of these votes are likely due to an honest mistake. There was an article in the NY Times about a Mexican immigrant, a mayor of a town in Kansas, being charged with voting illegally. He voted for Trump, by the way. He was just confused.
Why engage with the fuckwit troll David? All he has is Charlie Kirk bullshit. Well I can agree a bit with you on that, but what about you accepting this mountain of complete fucking bullshit. How come you are so unreasonable? Fuck this clown. Tell him to get the fuck out of here.
DeleteAmazing brief video. Newsom boasting about how stupid he is. And, telling the black audience that they should like him because they are also stupid, saying "I'm just like you."
ReplyDeletehttps://x.com/EndWokeness/status/2025749760443908555?
DeleteYeah, 'I'm just as stupid as you are.' Nice.
...but if so, hey, why don't they nominate some random ghetto guy?
Or if stupidity's the criterion, why not you?
DeleteNewsom is a fake liberal, like Somerby here.
DeleteHer's in the pocket of the elites, but he also supports trans people, so the Right hates him.
Lies
DeleteDon't engage with bullshit trolls,
DeleteHmmm. I wonder who said this:
ReplyDelete"I love the poorly educated."
"President Trump has been playing chess; the Democrats are playing checkers! "
ReplyDeleteAt first glance, I thought Somerby was quoting Somerby.
Trump is playing checkers; Dems are playing Go Fish.
DeleteFuck you asshole David. Get lost.
Delete