DIAGNOSIS: Baker quoted the nutcase Jones...

FRIDAY, APRIL 17, 2026

...disappeared Gupta and Trump: As we start, let's be fair to the New York Timesand to Peter Baker, a highly skilled synthesizer.  In fairness, let's say this:  

The basic premise of Baker's recent front-page report was in fact basically accurate. Also, the situation Baker described could be seen as a (somewhat low-IQ) matter of general interest.  

Baker's lengthy report appeared above the fold, on page 1A, in Tuesday's print editions. As it now appears online, it starts in the manner shown, principal headline included:

Trump’s Erratic Behavior and Extreme Comments Revive Mental Health Debate

President Trump’s erratic behavior and extreme comments in recent days and weeks have turbocharged the crazy-like-a-fox-or-just-plain-crazy debate that has followed him on the national political stage for a decade.

A series of disjointed, hard-to-follow and sometimes-profane statements capped by his “a whole civilization will die tonight” threat to wipe Iran off the map last week and his head-spinning attack on the “WEAK on Crime, and terrible for Foreign Policy” pope on Sunday night have left many with the impression of a deranged autocrat mad with power.

The White House rejected such assessments, saying that Mr. Trump is sharp and keeping his opponents on edge. But the president’s eruptions have raised questions about America’s leadership in a time of war...

Democrats who have long challenged Mr. Trump’s psychological fitness have issued a fresh chorus of calls to invoke the 25th Amendment to remove the president from power for disability. But it is not just a concern voiced by partisans on the left, late-night comics or mental health professionals making long-distance diagnoses. It can be heard now among retired generals, diplomats and foreign officials. And most strikingly, it can be heard now on the political right among onetime allies of the president.  

In fairness, all that was true! The president's behavior, and his unusual comments, had in fact resulted in a series of comments about his "mental health"about his "psychological fitness." 

It's also true that comments about the president's mental state had come from a wide array of sourcesnot just from "partisans of the left."  

It was true! Many people had issued challenging remarks about the president's mental state. And Baker seemed to be willing to cite all these commentseven those which came from some of the most disordered voices within the national maelstrom:

Former Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene, the Georgia Republican who recently broke with Mr. Trump, advocated using the 25th Amendment, telling CNN that threatening to destroy Iran’s civilization was “not tough rhetoric, it’s insanity.” Candace Owens, the far-right podcaster, called him “a genocidal lunatic.” Alex Jones, the conspiracy theorist and founder of Infowars, said Mr. Trump “does babble and sounds like the brain’s not doing too hot.”  

Baker was even willing to quote such profoundly marginal figures as Candace Owens and Alex Jones! To appearances, no one was being left behind!   

(In fairness, it can be defended as a matter of general interest when a deranged figure like Alex Jones says some of the things he has recently said. We say that because, however disordered Jones may be, he still has a fairly substantial following. For that reason, it qualifies as a matter of public interest to learn what he has said.)  

Baker quoted a wide array of public figures who had made recent remarks about the president's mental health. That said, there was (at least) one such well-known person the gentleman failed to cite.   

Unlike the nutcase Jones, there was a reasonable chance that the person in question actually knew what she was talking about! We refer to the (current or former) "mental health professional" who had appeared on CNN, where she had offered this:    

BURNETT (2/26/26): You've known him your whole life. Do you actually see a [cognitive] decline?

MARY L. TRUMP: I do, but I think it's important to remember that Donald has never been fit in any capacity. Obviously, what we're dealing with now are age-related cognitive declines. We're dealing with physical issues that the White House tries to cover over.

But this is somebody who for decades now has had serious, undiagnosed and untreated psychiatric disorders, which are only going to worsen, especially given the pressure he's under and given the cognitive and physical declines.  

Sad! Perhaps at the direction of his editors, Baker was willing to quote the nutcase Jones, but he refused to quote Mary Trump!   

In fairness, it's possible to regard Mary Trump as "an interested party," because, of course, she is. An editor might decide to disappear her rather startling assessments for that very reason.  

In fairness, you can imagine that some editor made some such assessment. That said, please notice this:  

Right at the start of his lengthy essay, Baker seems to say that "mental health professionals" (plural) have been making assessments about the president's mental health. NBC's Dr. Vin Gupta would be an obvious example.

(For Mediaite's report, click here. Headline: MS NOW Medical Analyst Dr. Vin Gupta Claims Trump Has ‘All The Signs of Dementia’)

Even though he was willing to quote a manifest nutcase like Alex Jones, Baker failed to quote any such medical specialist in the course of his long overview. Mary Trump's comments were disappeared, but so were Dr. Gupta's.

We regard that as an insulting refusal to serve. So too, we're sorry to say, in the case of Lawrence O'Donnell.   

As we noted yesterday, O'Donnell has done some serious reminiscing in several of his Last Word programs this week. On Wednesday night, he played videotape from the good old daysfrom the occasional broadcasts, during President Trump's first term, when he would bring Dr. Lance Dodes on the air to assess the president's mental health.   

Dr. Dodes had hardly been reassuring. On Wednesday's Last Word, O'Donnell played tape of Dr. Dodes from January 2021. In the tape O'Donnell played, Dr. Dodes was shown saying this about President Trump     

DR. DODES (1/9/21): A delusional psychopath who has been the same his whole adult life, and who we knew would get worse the more stress he was under, because that's what happens with people with this kind of severe disorder. ...He is going to continue to get worse.  

The fact that he said it doesn't mean it was true. But now, it does seem, to many observers, that president is "getting worse." But O'Donnell no longer interviews specialists like Dr. Dodesand in the wake of her comments on CNN, we can find no sign that he proceeded to interview Mary Trump.

Baker will tell you what the nutcase Jones has said. O'Donnell will play the videotape of the good old days, when he would, on the rare occasion, interview a medical specialist like Dr. Dodes.

Baker disappeared Mary Trump and Dr. Gupta. O'Donnell failed to say why he no longer conducts interviews of that type.

In each case, it seems to us that we're looking at a failure to serve. At what seems like a very dangerous time, we're looking at an imitation of journalismat an imitation of life.

Still coming: Much more remains to be said


27 comments:

  1. Re: “Still Coming: Much more to be said.” No, Bob you’ve said enough. Take the weekend off.

    ReplyDelete
  2. “the nutcase Jones...”

    Wait. Shouldn’t mental health experts be called in to determine if Jones is truly a nutcase? I mean, according to Somerby’s own standards?

    Also, to say that jones is a “profoundly marginal figure” but also “has a fairly substantial following” seems a bit incongruous. In fact, jones is influential with Trump’s base.

    And that makes it important that Jones was a staunch supporter of Trump and is now questioning his sanity. That’s a significant development, and is part of a public discussion of Trump’s mental state.

    And to be clear, the 25th amendment, if it is invoked, doesn’t require any medical or psychological diagnosis, just agreement by cabinet members and Congress. They ultimately have to decide if they feel Trump is unfit to serve.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Exactly, the point of discussing Jones, Kelly, Carlson, is that these are all former supporters who have changed their minds. Mary Trump hasn't done that.

      Delete
    2. Exactly! It's people like Jones who will carry this news into the bowels of the Trump's cult. Sane people cannot not penetrate that fortress.

      Delete
  3. You see, Jones is “profoundly marginal” but Gutfeld is of supreme importance. The proof: Somerby writes many posts about Gutfeld, and none about jones.

    ReplyDelete
  4. “Baker disappeared Mary Trump and Dr. Gupta.”

    Baker said:
    “But it is not just a concern voiced by partisans on the left, late-night comics or mental health professionals.”

    In other words, Baker specifically tells you that he is discussing people who are voicing concerns who are NOT mental health professionals. In Somerby’s world, that is “disappearing” mental health professionals.

    By the way, Gupta is a pulmonologist, not a psychologist.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Writers have to limit their subjects because they can't write about everything all at once. I cannot imagine Somerby teaching young children without understanding basic facts like that. The way Somerby complains about Mary Trump being ignored, he sounds like her agent.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. As I read Baker's article, I repeatedly found myself wondering, "What does Mary Trump think about this?"

      Delete
  6. "The fact that he said it doesn't mean it was true."

    That fact that someone is an expert on a subject, and is speaking on that very subject of expertise, makes what he said more likely to be true.

    We humans think in probabilities, not absolutes. We do not have the luxury of delaying all decisions about factual correctness until there is absolute certainty about truth. We estimate likelihoods and act accordingly. In most cases assuming that an expert will have an opinion that is closer to truth than an ignorant asshole works out pretty well.

    If you use some other criterion for assessing truth, such as believing what you want to hear, or "anything could be true, so why not this" or "that guy sounds so confident, he surely knows what he's talking about" then things do not work out as well.

    Over time, humans have evolved to make quick judgments under conditions of uncertainty. Yes, we have some biases (as described by Kahneman & Tversky) but we also have developed the ability to make choices in a way that leads to survival, especially in situations that can be deadly with the wrong choice. Somerby ignores that fact of human evolution and pretends that no one can know anything, so why try to figure anything out. We should all just wait until Mary Trump tells us what to believe about her uncle, and meanwhile give Trump the benefit of the doubt, because only Mary Trump knows whether Trump is crazy or not.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Personally, I think he is the anti-Christ.

      Delete
    2. That is the debate -- is Trump crazy or evil. I vote for evil too, but in less religious terms.

      Delete
    3. Yeah, Before this asshole came along, I didn't believe in God. Now I believe in the anti-Christ.

      Delete
    4. From Tiedrich today:

      "‘darkness and filth’ — if there are two words that better describe the malignant toad in the Oval Bordello, I couldn’t tell you what they are. Preznit Fuckwit shits over everything we hold dear, and leaves a slimy snail-trail of stench and corruption in his wake.

      and now, he and his piss-drunk Christofascist Secretary of Death are desperately trying to frame their unprovoked, unnecessary and illegal don’t-you-dare-call-it-a-war on Iran — one that was waged for no clear reason at all — as some kind of deity-endorsed holy battle for Armageddon.

      but wait — into the breach comes the Pope, the hero we need at the exact moment we need him, to say ‘fuck that shit and fuck it hard. don’t you fucking dare bring God into this.’

      oh, and in case you need Pope Leo’s flowery language simplified, here you go: Dear Leader is not the messiah, he’s a very naughty boy. now go away."

      Delete
  7. Mary Trump and her uncle did not get along as adults. Her judgments about his personality were formed when she was a child. She never lived in the same household as Donald Trump. She bears a hefty grudge against Fred Trump for driving her father to drink, and she went to court because she and her mother were left out of Fred Trump's will and thus did not get to feed at the Trump trough.

    That doesn't make her judgments about Trump wrong, but she has been at arm's length from Trump while she was growing up and has not had close access to him as an adult. Why then is she Somerby's go-to expert on all things Trump? Why does Somerby prefer Mary Trump's opinions to those of General Kelly and others who worked closely on a daily business with Trump in his recent presidency?

    Because of her biases, no judge would consider Mary Trump the right person to evaluate Donald Trump's mental competence, if he were in a hearing over conservatorship, for example.

    I believe Somerby keeps touting Mary Trump because she is saying what he wants to hear. So, the question is why Somerby wants to hear that Trump is crazy and not that he is an immoral criminal who stole the presidency and is ruining our country with his grifting?

    Why does Somerby say nothing at all about the most serious of Trump's behaviors, including his Epstein crimes, his ruining of the environment by undermining alternative energy sources, his complete failure to address the needs of working people and others under his care, his violation of the Constitution and attempt to overthrow a valid election by force, and his pursuit of illegal wars for personal gain?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Mary Trump has stated publicly that she has no pity or sympathy for Donald, and that he should be held accountable for his actions. Talk about disappearing…Somerby never tells you that.

      Delete
  8. "Still coming: Much more remains to be said"

    Much more remains to be said over and over again...

    FTFY

    ReplyDelete
  9. RFK Jr. recently admitted to mutilating a raccoon body (road kill) out of supposed scientific interest, by carving out its reproductive organs, by the side of the road.

    This is not only bizarre behavior but it is the way psychopaths behave. They start with animal mutilation and torture and some work up to carving human beings. (If we are lucky, they become surgeons instead of serial killers.)

    Trump appointed this guy as a health expert. He could un-appoint him. I think any sane president would recognize the inappropriateness of leaving this guy in his position and remove him quickly. Not Trump. That is yet another example of why Trump is unfit to be president. He isn't paying attention to anything but his own interests and he doesn't even think like a politician would about those he has put in high positions.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Here is a biased headline against Gavin Newsom, from Mediaite:

    "Gavin Newsom’s PAC Spent $1.5 Million To Buy Copies of His Book"

    As you read the article, it turns out that he is giving a free copy of his newly released book to anyone who contributes to his campaign. His PAC bought copies of his book to fulfill that promise to donors. It is a legitimate use of campaign funds. It is also something all other campaigns, right and left, have done.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The article also states that Newsom did not receive royalties from the purchase by his PAC, and that the campaign had received more money in donations than it paid for the books.

      The source of this attempt to tarnish Newsom is, of course, the NY Times.

      Delete
    2. Why is so-called blue media already attacking Newsom?

      Delete
  11. Donald Trump re-posted an immature, offensive parody picture. OTOH he got the stock market to a new record, got the Strait of Hormuz opened, de-fanged Hezbollah, de-fanged Hamas, and is ending Iran's nuclear threat. The latter is a million times more important than the former, so why are we talking about it?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Excellent illustration of the way Trump takes credit for things he didn't do.

      Delete
    2. Do you get credit for ending a war you started yourself for no good reason?

      Delete
    3. DiC, please explain why this recent war was necessary. Trump said Iran’s nuclear capacity was obliterated by US strikes last year, and the strait of Hormuz was open until he bombed Iran this most recent time.

      Delete
    4. @12:00 - If you are asking a serious question, here are some answers. Iran remained a long-term nuclear threat to the middle east, to Europe, and eventually to the US.

      Despite the effective bombing a few months ago, Iran continued to work on building nuclear weapons. The enriched uranium buried in the bombing might have been recovered eventually. I also read about a possible other store of enriched uranium under some city. Iran's armaments were already so strong that it was nearly impossible to stop their nuclear advances by military means. On an unusually courageous leader would have tried it. Ove time, their military would have gotten even stronger.

      Also, the recent massacre of perhaps 32,000 Iranian protesters is a reminder of why it would be so dangerous to allow this particular government to have nuclear weapons.

      Delete
  12. Baker's article was a political analysis; that is, it was the first derivative of function of Trump's mental infirmities. Baker was not so much trying to diagnose Trump as he was trying to show the political implications, where some of his most ardent supporters were turning against him. Granted, MTG had turned against Trump a while ago.
    As far as I am concerned, it's enough to start beating that Drum. It needs to be loud enough that even the denizens in the dark corners of FOX News to hear this message. Need to plant the seeds.

    ReplyDelete