MONDAY, APRIL 6, 2026
On the bright side, we have an excuse: In this morning's report, we said we were going to post the text of the president recent unusual statements.
(This afternoon, in his press event, he added to the list.)
We're holding off for a day. Starting Saturday morning, we had an undesirable response to a prescribed pharmaceutical. As we regain full functioning, we'll wait for a brighter day.
David in Cal, suck on this:
ReplyDeleteTrump’s “victory timeline” claims.
Mar 3: “We won the war.”
Mar 7: “We defeated Iran.”
Mar 9: “We must attack Iran.”
Mar 9: “The war is ending almost completely, and very beautifully.”
Mar 11: “You never like to say too early you won. We won. In the first hour it was over.”
Mar 12: “We did win, but we haven’t won completely yet.”
Mar 13: “We won the war.”
Mar 14: “Please help us.”
Mar 15: “If you don’t help us, I will certainly remember it.”
Mar 16: “Actually, we don’t need any help at all.”
Mar 16: “I was just testing to see who’s listening to me.”
Mar 16: “If NATO doesn’t help, they will suffer something very bad.”
Mar 17: “We neither need nor want NATO’s help.”
Mar 17: “I don’t need Congressional approval to withdraw from NATO.”
Mar 18: “Our allies must cooperate in reopening the Strait of Hormuz.”
Mar 19: “US allies need to get a grip – step up and help open the Strait of Hormuz.”
Mar 20: “NATO are cowards.”
Mar 21: “The Strait of Hormuz must be protected by the countries that use it. We don’t use it, we don’t need to open it.”
Mar 22: “This is the last time. I will give Iran 48 hours. Open the strait”
Mar 22: “Iran is Dead”
Mar 23: “We had very good and productive talks with Iran.”
Mar 24: “We’re making progress.”
Mar 25: “They gave us a present and the present arrived today. And it was a very big present worth a tremendous amount of money. I’m not going to tell you what that present is, but it was a very significant prize.”
Mar 26: “Make a deal, or we’ll just keep blowing them away.”
Mar 27: “We don’t have to be there for NATO.”
Mar 28: No major quote
Mar 29: Claimed talks were progressing
Mar 30: “Open the Strait of Hormuz immediately, or face devastating consequences.”
Mar 31: Claimed a deal was “very close” and that Iran would “do the right thing”
Apr 1: “We’ll see what happens very soon.”
Apr 2: Repeated that a deal was likely, while warning of continued strikes if not
Apr 3: “Something big is going to happen.”
Apr 4: Said Iran must comply “immediately” or face further consequences.
Apr 5: “Open the fuckin’ Strait, you crazy bastards, or you’ll be living in Hell – JUST WATCH! Praise be to Allah.”
You fucking moron.
2 paradoxes
ReplyDelete1. Obeying international law against a regime that flaunts international law. Suppose an evil regime murders thousands of its own people as well as thousands of foreigners. Takes over international waters, attacks foreign ships at will. Threatens death to you and your countrymen. Suppose that in order to defeat this regime, some small violations of international law would be necessary. Should honorable countries strictly obey international law, thus allowing this evil regime to persist?
2. Tolerance of intolerance. Suppose a culture believes in treating women like property, killing all Jews and gays. Should immigrants from this culture be tolerantly welcomed in, thus destroying the tolerant culture of the host country?
"Suppose that in order to defeat this regime, some small violations of international law would be necessary."
DeleteNo. Don't suppose that. Adherence to law isn't "being nice." It is in our own interests. How will blowing up non-military infrastructure help the US achieve its aims--whatever those are this week?
"Should honorable countries strictly obey international law, thus allowing this evil regime to persist??"
DeleteYour mistake here is to suppose that the 'small' violations of international law you envision, would bring about the end of the evil regime.
But of course they won't necessarily be 'small', and there's certainly no prospect of them bringing out the end of the regime.
They would instead just be the lashing out of an angry man-baby who has tired of his invasion and wants to move on to something else, but can't.
Flouts international law, not flaunts it. English is hard for foreign trolls.
DeleteOf course #2 is what most Western European nations are doing. It is destroying their culture: women's rights, religious freedom, freedom of speech will disappear from these foolish countries.
ReplyDeleteDavid in Cal, suck on this:
DeleteTrump’s “victory timeline” claims.
Mar 3: “We won the war.”
Mar 7: “We defeated Iran.”
Mar 9: “We must attack Iran.”
Mar 9: “The war is ending almost completely, and very beautifully.”
Mar 11: “You never like to say too early you won. We won. In the first hour it was over.”
Mar 12: “We did win, but we haven’t won completely yet.”
Mar 13: “We won the war.”
Mar 14: “Please help us.”
Mar 15: “If you don’t help us, I will certainly remember it.”
Mar 16: “Actually, we don’t need any help at all.”
Mar 16: “I was just testing to see who’s listening to me.”
Mar 16: “If NATO doesn’t help, they will suffer something very bad.”
Mar 17: “We neither need nor want NATO’s help.”
Mar 17: “I don’t need Congressional approval to withdraw from NATO.”
Mar 18: “Our allies must cooperate in reopening the Strait of Hormuz.”
Mar 19: “US allies need to get a grip – step up and help open the Strait of Hormuz.”
Mar 20: “NATO are cowards.”
Mar 21: “The Strait of Hormuz must be protected by the countries that use it. We don’t use it, we don’t need to open it.”
Mar 22: “This is the last time. I will give Iran 48 hours. Open the strait”
Mar 22: “Iran is Dead”
Mar 23: “We had very good and productive talks with Iran.”
Mar 24: “We’re making progress.”
Mar 25: “They gave us a present and the present arrived today. And it was a very big present worth a tremendous amount of money. I’m not going to tell you what that present is, but it was a very significant prize.”
Mar 26: “Make a deal, or we’ll just keep blowing them away.”
Mar 27: “We don’t have to be there for NATO.”
Mar 28: No major quote
Mar 29: Claimed talks were progressing
Mar 30: “Open the Strait of Hormuz immediately, or face devastating consequences.”
Mar 31: Claimed a deal was “very close” and that Iran would “do the right thing”
Apr 1: “We’ll see what happens very soon.”
Apr 2: Repeated that a deal was likely, while warning of continued strikes if not
Apr 3: “Something big is going to happen.”
Apr 4: Said Iran must comply “immediately” or face further consequences.
Apr 5: “Open the fuckin’ Strait, you crazy bastards, or you’ll be living in Hell – JUST WATCH! Praise be to Allah.”
You fucking moron.
@April 6 - A chronology of words is not very important. A chronology of actions is what matters. Suggest you prepare that list.
DeleteIf Trump can’t keep his words straight how can anyone expect coherent actions? Not to mention that words ARE actions.
DeleteMid Feb I was paying $2.50/gal, today I paid $4.20, how’s that for a fucking chronology you fucking imbecile
DeleteSucks to be you, don't it David.
DeleteChronology of Trumps war:
DeleteMarch 3rd: USA loses war to Iran.
Sad.
"A chronology of actions is what matters."
DeleteJune 2025: US bombs Iran, severely damaging nuclear program.
June '25-March '26: Iran nuclear program is dormant, per US intelligence community.
Feb '26: Trump admin assembles armada, pretends to negotiate with Iran. Iran makes significant concessions, either ignored or misunderstood by subpar US negotiators.
Feb 28: Without warning, in middle of negotations, and without consulting any allies, US attacks Iran.
March '26: US military dominates Iran, except that Iran demonstrates ability to control traffic in Strait of Hormuz. Trump, wanting to declare victory and move on, can't. Gets frustrated. Can't figure out why allies are blowing him off, acting like they think he's an asshole.
Easter Sunday: Marco Rubio, from official State Department account , tweets 'He is risen.' (thank God we're not ruled by crazy theocrats).
Trump calls Iranians crazy bastards and adds 'praise be to Allah' just for the lolz. Threatens war crimes. Ho hum.
Trump did consult the only ally who was willing to be involved with the US before attacking.
DeleteOf course Iran has the ability to control traffic in the Strait of Hormuz. They can attack ships there. Lots of countries could attack ships in the Strait of Hormuz The only difference is the willingness to attack the ships.
Yes, "allies" are blowing off the US's request to get involved. I agree that this is a significant diplomatic failure for Trump.
As you know I'm not a Christian, but I think it's offensive to equate Christianity with a religion that throws gay people off rooftops and treats women like possessions rather than equal human beings.
As a Christian, I find it offensive that Christianity has been hijacked by its worst manifestations, Hegseth’s pastor for example, who believes women shouldn’t vote and homosexuality should be criminalized. What right wing Christian believes or acts on any of this:
DeleteJesus said: “You have heard that it was said, ‘Love your neighbor and hate your enemy.’ But I tell you, love your enemies and pray for those who persecute you, that you may be children of your Father in heaven.” Matthew 5:43
“When a foreigner resides among you in your land, do not mistreat them. The foreigner residing among you must be treated as your native-born. Love them as yourself, for you were foreigners in Egypt.”
—Leviticus 19:33–34
Leviticus, of course, is the Old Testament, and part of the Torah. (Are you Jewish, DiC?)
"it's offensive to equate Christianity with a religion that throws gay people off rooftops and treats women like possessions rather than equal human beings."
DeleteWith Hegseth in charge, we seem to have a version of Christianity in which people are blown up based on their suspicion of having committed a crime or their suspicion of committing a crime at some point in the future.
You don't seem offended by that.
Yes, preventive wars are always questionable. Are they necessary? Are they worth the cost? Can they be won?
DeleteAthens started a preventive war against Sparta. Athens lost and the war led to its demise. OTOH the Allies failed to start a preventive war against Hitler. It took 80 million lives and almost led to the end of freedom on the entire planet.
What's my judgment regarding Trump's war against Iran? I think a nuclear armed Iran would have been a big problem, even without leading to a nuclear war. Iran could have used the threat of their nukes is many different ways. There's a small chance the Iraqi nuclear weapons might have fallen into the hands of terrorists who used them.
I am not sure Trump's efforts will lead Iran to stop seeking nuclear weapons. I am somewhat optimistic, but quite uncertain.
The cost to the US in $ of this war is big.
I can understand why people think the war was not a good idea. However, there seem to actually be some Americans who are rooting for Iran to win! I suspect most of these are people are dupes, rather than homophobic, misogynistic, antisemites.
Wish the brain dead mother fucker would've just invaded Cuba FFS. But they ain't got no oil so not really a consideration.
DeleteI am a homophobic, misogynistic, antisemite who is rootin tootin for Putin just like you are David.
Delete"OTOH the Allies failed to start a preventive war against Hitler."
DeleteLook at all the countries that failed to start a preventive war against the US. Now there are people dying in Iran because of that.
Funny, because Hegseth IS a misogynist and homophobe. On the other hand, you classify any criticism of Israel as antisemitic, DiC.
Delete"OTOH the Allies failed to start a preventive war against Hitler."
DeleteUnfortunately, Édouard Daladier wasn't worried about the country learning about Epstein files showing he raped at least one 13-year-old girl.
"OTOH the Allies failed to start a preventive war against Hitler"
DeleteThe Allies? Our allies fought Hitler for a good long while before the US joined in. Admit it. You slept through American History, didn't you?
"I think it's offensive to equate Christianity with a religion that throws gay people off rooftops and treats women like possessions rather than equal human beings."
DeleteBWAHA!
“ TEHRAN (The Borowitz Report)—In what is being hailed as a diplomatic breakthrough, in the early hours of Tuesday the government of Iran offered the US a peace plan which insiders say trades a strait for a straitjacket.
ReplyDeleteAlthough details have yet to be hammered out, the Iranian proposal drew enthusiastic praise from over a hundred world leaders including France’s Emmanuel Macron and Canada’s Mark Carney, who called it “long overdue.”
As news of the offer spread around the world, spontaneous dancing broke out in the streets of such cities as London, Berlin, and Nuuk, the capital of Greenland.
According to those familiar with the offer, the Iranians revised the US peace plan and added a 25th amendment.”
“A chronology of words is not very important.”
ReplyDeleteWe know, DiC, we know. Just because Trump campaigned no more foreign wars and fearmongered about Harris starting WWIII, which caused a lot of people to vote for him, we should all realize his words are pure bullshit.
Good strategy.
David 9:07 Trump blew off Ukraine, the world's most formidable missile and drone attacker and defender. That's how far his head is up Putin's ass
ReplyDeleteBlew off? The US contributed more to Ukraine's defense than any other country. The US continues to provide the same advanced weapons to Ukraine, although European countries are now paying for them.
DeleteMost of the US aid to Ukraine was set up under Biden:
Delete“ Since Trump assumed office in January 2025, there has been no legislation or other authorizations of significant new aid to Ukraine. However, a substantial amount of the aid appropriated under the Biden administration is still in the pipeline, and deliveries of aid packages have continued, although on two occasions the Trump administration temporarily paused some deliveries. As of December 31, 2025, the U.S. had disbursed 58 percent of the $188 billion in spending related to the conflict (U.S. spending is first appropriated, then obligated, then disbursed). Nonetheless, the lack of new aid commitments means that U.S. aid deliveries are running out.“
Of course, you frequently decried the aid to Ukraine, DiC, saying we were just perpetuating the war, which Trump promised to end on Day One, and his negotiations always end up favoring Russia.
David, you apparently aren’t aware of this, which is what 12:15 was talking about:
Delete“U.S. President Donald Trump has publicly dismissed Ukraine’s offer to share its combat-tested drone defense expertise, despite earlier U.S. requests for such assistance. The rebuff comes as Washington faces missile shortages from the war with Iran and as Kyiv seeks advanced weaponry like Tomahawks, now even less likely to be delivered. The move underscores widening policy rifts between Trump and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy, complicating both military cooperation and stalled peace talks with Russia.”
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/insight/trump-rejects-ukraine-drone-aid-amid-tensions/gm-GM409EF3EA?gemSnapshotKey=GM409EF3EA-snapshot-0&ocid=wispr
David loves Pooti Poo and Mother Russia.
DeleteOh Fanny. My sweet, dear Fanny. Oh my Fanny.
ReplyDeleteBe prepared to kiss your sweet fanny goodbye.
DeleteI have been thinking about the justifications for the Iran war I've heard and read. For a long while, they didn't sit quite right with me, though I couldn't say exactly way. I think I've finally sorted it out:
ReplyDeleteWe needed to attack Iran to keep them from obtaining a nuclear weapon. Why? India, Pakistan, North Korea all acquired nuclear weapons and we didn't attack any of them. Why is Iran different? We're told that traditional deterrence works with those other countries--they all know that if they use nukes, they'll be obliterated. They're not insane enough to risk assured annihilation for a fleeting tactical win.
Not Iran, though. The mullahs are caRAAAAzy, yeah? They don't care whether they're facing overwhelming retaliation. They're so full of insane hatred that deterrence means nothing to them. They'll gladly sacrifice their entire population to a demented holy war. So we have no choice but to attack preemptively, right?
So why now is the US president threatening Iran with the same total annihilation that won't work to deter nuclear war for a piddling little strait? Haven't we been told that the threat of destruction means nothing at all to these crazy, violent terrorists?
Apparently we have to threaten them with destruction because threatening them with destruction won't work.
Make sense.
Ask Dickhead in Cal. He understands the Iranian Mullahs are suicidal
DeleteIf we don't destroy an entire country, someone might destroy an entire country.
DeleteWhy is Iran different? Because of an apartheid genocidal regime in the region.
DeleteWhy is Iran different from India, Pakistan, North Korea?
Delete1. We cannot now prevent those 3 countries from getting a nuclear arsenal. We can prevent Iran (maybe).
2. Iran is particularly dangerous to other countries because of militaristic government, expansionist policies, and utter immorality as regards international law and decent human conduct. They’re like less competent Nazis.
I be am not sure that these reasons make tha attack the best policy, but imo they certainly make this attack a plausible policy.
BTW I discuss plausibility in terms of US interest and my personal interest, not in terms of some abstract, universal morality. I am a lot more concerned about the well-being of me than of some unfortunate Iranian.
Trump says "a whole civilization will die tonight" ... "I don't want that to happen, but it probably will"
ReplyDeletePresident Trump said Tuesday morning, ahead of his looming deadline for Iran to reopen the Strait of Hormuz, that "a whole civilization will die tonight," adding that he didn't "want that to happen, but it probably will."
"A whole civilization will die tonight, never to be brought back again," Mr. Trump said in a post on his Truth Social platform just after 8 a.m. in Washington. "I don't want that to happen, but it probably will. However, now that we have Complete and Total Regime Change, where different, smarter, and less radicalized minds prevail, maybe something revolutionarily wonderful can happen, WHO KNOWS? We will find out tonight, one of the most important moments in the long and complex history of the World."
This is fucking horrifying to listen to.
While the Republican Congress sits silently.
Delete