FRIDAY: As heard on Gutfeld! and The Five!

FRIDAY, MAY 1, 2026

Emily Compagno speaks: Has the Southern Poverty Law Center committed some sort of criminal act?  

We have no way of answering that question. But as you may know, the DOJ announced this indictment back on April 21, as NBC News reported:  

Southern Poverty Law Center indicted on charges that it fraudulently paid informants in extremist groups

Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche on Tuesday announced an indictment against the Southern Poverty Law Center, alleging the civil rights organization has engaged in financial crimes.    

Blanche said at a news conference that the Justice Department’s investigation found the organization had been “manufacturing the extremism it purports to oppose by paying sources to stoke racial hatred,” and then hiding those payments.

The 11-count indictment from a federal grand jury consists of six counts of wire fraud, four counts of false statements to a federally insured bank and one count of conspiracy to commit money laundering.

“The Southern Poverty Law Center’s ('SPLC') stated mission included the dismantling of white supremacy and confronting hate across the country. However, unbeknownst to donors, some of their donated money was being used to fund the leaders and organizers of racist groups, including the Ku Klux Klan, the Aryan Nation, and the National Alliance,” the indictment alleges. 

[...]  

Bryan Fair, interim chief executive of the SPLC, said in a statement that the organization is still reviewing the charges but that after witnessing the Justice Department’s news conference they are “outraged by the false allegations.”

And so on from there. For the record, that's what the indictment alleges

For ourselves, we have no particular faith in indictments brought by the current DOJ, or in statements by Acting Attorney General Blanche. This is the same DOJ which has recently indicted James Comey again, on a widely ridiculed charge. 

That said, we'll wait to see what comes to light if this case really goes to trial. 

For today, we thought we'd show you what we meant with a recent reference to Emily Compagno, a frequent co-host on The Five, the nation's most watched "cable news" program.   

Reaction to this indictmentto these allegationswas swift within the MAGA realm. As Mediaite reports, the sitting president saw it as the latest way to advance the never-ending claim that the 2020 election had been stolen:   

Trump Demands 2020 Election ‘Be Wiped From the Books’ If New SPLC Case Proves ‘True’   

President Donald Trump called for the 2020 presidential election to “be permanently wiped from books and be of no further force or effect” if new fraud charges brought by the Justice Department against the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC) prove “true.”

The president unloaded on the prominent civil rights group in the early hours of Friday morning and described the organization as “one of the greatest political scams in American History”  

[...]  

The president then shared two memes and screengrabs of posts from Elon Musk about the SPLC allegations.   

And so on from there.

In fairness, even the president said he's willing to wait to see if the allegations are actually shown to be true. In several appearances on Gutfeld! and The Five, Compagno has shown no such reticence. 

For all we know, Compagno may be the finest person on earth among her family and friends. On cable TV, she is strongly inclined to make absurd statements like the one she made this Monday night, there on the Gutfeld! program.  

The panel was discussing the previous weekend's attempted assassination attempt at the Washington Hilton. Compagno was present at the Correspondents Dinner, like the mainstream journalists whose alleged attacks on President Trump, or so she said, had led to the assassination attempt

Near the end of a somewhat jumbled presentation, she absurdly offered this:

COMPAGNO (4/27/26): [Mainstream journalists] have the nerve to distance themselves from any culpability whatsoever [for the assassination attempt]. And then they say things like, "Well, the right extremists, that's the real danger." When we have learned that the right extremist danger was manufactured this entire time by the left-wing extremist danger, funded by SPLC. 

Based on that recent untested indictment, Compagno seemed to say that any apparent right-wing violence in recent years was really an artefact of the conduct of the Southern Poverty Law Center! A few days later, she made a similar representation when she appeared as a guest on The Five

This ludicrous claim is starting to spread within Fox News Channel circles.  When we the people watch these "cable news" shows, we're fed this pitiful gruel.

Compagno may be the nicest person on earth among her family and friends. She belongs on the nation's most-watched "cable news" programs in much the waywell, let's just leave it at that.

These Fox News Channel programs are undisguised imitations of life. So too with the major Blue American news orgs and journalists who refuse to report on these deeply destructive programs.

More tape: To watch that full segment from Monday evening's Gutfeld! show, you can just click here.


31 comments:

  1. TLDR Somerby: Fucking nasty Nazi racist motherfuckers, but they make the best friends..

    ReplyDelete
  2. “Untested indictment” is spin. An indictment IS a test. The prosecutor’s charge is tested by going before the grand jury.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Go take a flying fuck , fascist bastard

      Delete
  3. The SPLC received donations that were given for the purpose of opposing hate groups and used those donations to support hate groups. That may or may not be a crime, but it's heinous.

    However, SPLC also did another type of wrongdoing: They used their influence to tar people who were not Haters. One such victim was Charlie Kirk. The lies that SPLC told about Kirk may not have violated the law, but the SPLC has his blood on its hands.

    The economics of agency are interesting. What's good for the SPLC personnel is not always the same as what's good for its supporters. More bigotry is good for the SPLC. The underlying economics apply to many areas. More tooth decay is good for dentists. More crime is good for policemen.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. What a surprise. Dickhead going to bat for the KKK

      Delete
    2. "The SPLC....used those donations to support hate groups."

      So if the FBI has an informant in a drug cartel (and pays the informant since he may be risking his life), then the FBI is supporting organized crime? Is that your position?

      Delete
    3. They paid informants, you dingbat. How else do you penetrate organizations such as Klan? Do you just walk up to them and ask them if they mind that you sit in on their meetings?
      I am sure Klan would never be hostile to minorities if it weren't for the SPLC and their informants.

      PS: They worked the FBI in this fashion back in the 70's.

      Delete
    4. David in CVal,
      How do you feel about the DoJ lying about how the SPLC wasn't informing them or the FBI of their findings about the white supremacy groups?

      Delete
    5. Turns out, despite the Trump Department of Justice not being at all interested in blunting the actions of white supremacy organizations, the SPLC told them what they learned anyway.

      Delete
    6. Hector - Try this scenario. The FBI hires someone to create a drug cartel then pays this person to inform on his own drug cartel. This is not so far-fetched when you consider that the infamous "Unite the Right" demonstration, the one where Trump did not call Nazis "fine people," was co-organized by the SPLC representative.
      One source, identified as "F-37," was part of an "online leadership chat group that planned the 2017 ‘Unite the Right’ event."

      "[F-37] attended the event at the direction of the SPLC. F-37 made racist postings under the supervision of the SPLC and helped coordinate transportation to the event for several attendees. Between 2015 and 2023, the SPLC secretly paid F-37 more than $270,000.00."

      Delete
    7. Why would the SPLC think Right-wingers would be fine hating Jews? Experience talking listening to them?

      Delete
    8. That reminds me of back when Somerby was suggesting the Left should listen to their fellow citizens on the Right.
      Somerby stopped making that suggestion when we did so, and reported back to him how racist as fuck the Right is.

      Delete
    9. First, you're getting your information from the Trump DOJ, a notoriously corrupt entity.

      You say the informant "co-organized" the Unite the Right rally by participating in an on-line chat group. But you leave out how many other people were members of this chat group. 3? 10? 138?

      The indictment itself accuses the informant of having "helped plan" the rally, which is a couple of steps down from "co-organized".

      And in its response to the indictment, the SPLC says it sent a 45-page “event alert” to the FBI in advance of the rally with information gathered from the informant program.

      You have no bullshit detector when it comes to the Trump admin. This indictment was designed to generate some headlines, not get a conviction.

      Delete
    10. Dickhead has no bullshit detector because he is not interested in truth. Try to understand this.

      Delete
    11. This is fucking fascinating. The Trump fascist regime is trying to make it a crime to monitor and right wing white supremacists groups. It’s fucking brilliant in a horrific shitty wsu

      Delete
    12. It’s all happening so fast that I am having trouble keeping score. So at this point Todd Blanche is batting zero for what?

      Delete
    13. DiC has a bullshit detector. It’s his dinner bell. The sound of it has him running.

      Delete
  4. The allegations in the indictment have nothing to do with any election results. There is no way that Trump or anyone else can deny the election outcome on the basis of these charges.

    Somerby should be saying that, instead of pretending that he will wait for the outcome of the trial to decide whether Trump is saying ridiculous things about the validity of the 2020 election. When Somerby takes a specious wait-and-see attitude toward unrelated things, he gives comfort to the right wing's unfounded claims. Someone claiming to be liberal, or even wishing to see Democrats prevail in the midterms, should not be doing this.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Somerby says Trump is mentally damaged, and intimates that we can't get rid of him because the entire Republican Party loves Trump's over the top bigotry.
      That sounds like something someone who is a realist, not a Right-winger, would say.

      Delete
    2. "Somerby should be saying that, instead of pretending that he will wait for the outcome of the trial to decide whether Trump is saying ridiculous things about the validity of the 2020 election."

      Somerby says nothing resembling this, idiot.

      Delete
    3. Somerby says:

      “ That said, we'll wait to see what comes to light if this case really goes to trial. ”

      Delete
    4. 10:09,
      Somerby has mentioned Trump's mental condition more than once.

      Delete
  5. “In fairness, even the president said he's willing to wait to see if the allegations are actually shown to be true.”

    By all means, let’s be fair to Caligula

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yes, let’s all be fair. It’s worked out so well so far

      Delete
  6. This dovetails perfectly with the observation that Trump is mentally damaged.

    ReplyDelete
  7. "Todd Blanche? I'd stake my life on his ability to ferret out the truth." G. Maxwell.

    ReplyDelete
  8. The entire point of Red State gerrymandering is to take race into account.

    ReplyDelete
  9. “This ludicrous claim is starting to spread within Fox News Channel circles. ”

    This ludicrous claim is being spread here, by Somerby’s evil troll commenter David in Cal.

    ReplyDelete
  10. "ludicrous" is what's known as a "hedging word."
    Such words or phrases are called "hedges" or "hedging words." They signal uncertainty, lack of direct evidence, or soften a claim. Examples: "obviously," "apparently," "seems," "likely," "probably," "it appears," and "presumably."

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Exactly none of your examples apply to the use of the adjective "ludicrous" in the context given, nor any other, for that matter. You have amply shown us on numerous occasions that you do not know how to Google for information. Let's now head over to that dusty bookshelf of yours and pull out your Merriam Webster. Give that a try.

      Delete
  11. "Boy, I'd give anything to sit inn Todd Blanche's shoes and bask in all that power and prestige." Rudy Giuliani.

    ReplyDelete