ORDINARY PEOPLE: "I believe it was a fake attack!"

FRIDAY, MAY 1, 2026

So said we the people: King Charles and his once unlikely queen have gone back to jolly olde. If we could rent him as a replacement head of state, we'd strongly consider the prospect. 

Despite the absence of a ballroom, a dinner was held in honor of the royal pair. In this morning's New York Times, Elisabeth Bumiller reports the current state of our breakaway nation's rapidly failing union:  

What the Royal State Dinner Guest List Says About Trump’s America

Guest lists for White House state dinners have always been political rather than social documents. Avidly chewed over in Washington, they broadcast an administration’s priorities, favored businesses, top donors and media allies. They are supposed to reflect the country being honored.

By those standards, the Trump guest list for the state dinner for King Charles III of Britain and Queen Camilla on Tuesday night was another whack at norms in an administration that likes to shatter them.

Among the more than 100 guests were at least 10 American billionaires, six Fox News hosts, one Fox News executive, six conservative Supreme Court justices, numerous Silicon Valley tech titans and assorted friends of the president’s. There were no British cultural figures and, for that matter, a meager number of British overall. The British Embassy in Washington appears to have had limited input into the guest list.

There were also no Democratic politicians, which has been the case at other Trump state dinners.  

And so on from thereand so it appears to go

The six conservative justices were present at the dinner. The three liberal justices were not. 

There were no Democratic Party politicians. Six Fox News host were numbered among the guestsand that included the 47-year-old "silly boy" who says that he did this:   

‘You Said That? To the QUEEN?!’ Fox’s Jesse Watters Admits to Making Gun Violence Joke to Queen Camilla

Fox News hosts Jesse Watters and Greg Gutfeld were among the attendees at a White House state dinner with King Charles III and Queen Camilla this week, and they shared some eyebrow-raising comments about the event on Wednesday’s episode of The Five 

[...]   

According to The New York Times, the king and queen are both “avid supporters of beekeeping.” A new hive on the South Lawn was “crafted to look like the real White House,” the Times noted.

The king “had no idea who I was,” said Watters, continuing:

So I said, “I’m on Fox and I have two shows.” And he goes, “Well, they must really love you here.” And I said, “Yeah.”

So we go down, and there’s the queen. And I said, “Well, how was the beehive?” She goes, “It was very good. No one got stung.”

And then I said, “Well, you know in Washington, D.C., you know, the bees don’t get you, the guns will.”

“You said that? To the queen?!” Perino asked, shock evident in her voice as Watters covered his face with his hands. 

The silly child covered his face with his hands. This is the type of scripted inanity which helps animate the daily agitprop of The Five, this nation's most-watched "cable news" program.    

Corporate tools like Perino and Watters play these roles each day, with Gutfeld called upon to deliver one of his increasingly deranged hyper-partisan topical blasts. 

On Wednesday's edition of this astonishing "cable news" charade, Watters covered his face as he acknowledged his latest very bad conduct. This scripted inanity continues to score with us the American people, as the newest numbers make clear:  

Greg Gutfeld and Jesse Watters Dominate Cable News Ratings...

Fox News continued its cable news ratings dominance in April with hosts Greg Gutfeld and Jesse Watters pulling in the biggest numbers, while CNN and MS NOW also notched prime time gains.

In Monday through Sunday prime time total viewers, Fox averaged 2.9 million viewers...April marked Fox’s third-most-watched April in the network’s history, according to Nielsen data.

The biggest numbers came from The Five, which averaged 3.8 million viewers, and Jesse Watters Primetime, which averaged 3.6 million. Those were followed by Sean Hannity’s show at 3.2 million and Gutfeld! with 3 million. Bret Baier over on Special Report also averaged around 3 million viewers overall. 

Those five shows took the top five spots for cable news for the month. Watters and Gutfeld are both co-hosts of The Five as well as hosting their eponymous shows—easily making them the two most-watched personalities in the cable news business.  

Watters and Gutfeld continue to produce the biggest numbers in cable newsand yes, it is a (highly profitable) "business." 

On average, 3.8 million of us the people watch the imitation of life called The Five on a daily basis. The audience for Jesse Watters Primetime isn't far behind.

By way of contrast, the most watched weekly MS NOW showThe Last Word with Lawrence O'Donnellaveraged 1.6 million viewers for the month. MS NOW shows hosted by Nicolle Wallace, Chris Hayes and Jen Psaki averaged 1.3 or 1.4 million. Gutfeld! more than doubles that.

In fairness, Blue America's cable news is hardly a perfect productbut Red America's counterpart on the Fox News Channel is an imitation of life. The question we'd ask you is this:

Can "we the people" hope to attain "a more perfect union" when this channel continues to roll out clown cars filled with D-list comedians, former professional "wrestlers" and an endless assortment of Unrecognizables, topped by the towel-snapping apparent misogyny of Watters and Gutfeld?  

Can a more perfect union emerge despite that societal stress? Go aheadtake a good look around!

The presence of Watters and Gutfeld on these heavily watched TV shows is the braindead, poisoned fruit of the "democratization of media." 

In fairness, their braindead behavior is matched by that of the New York Times and The Atlantic and of Blue American royalty like Rachel Maddowby the refusal of these timorous, self-dealing souls to report and discuss the ugly inanity churned by the Fox News Channel for us, the American people.

At one time, we the people split into the Blue and the Gray. Today, we flounder ahead as we're encouraged to align as the Red and the Blue. 

Can a modern nation survive the corporate conduct which hands us this braindead spectaclethis daily assault on the possibility of seeking a more perfect union?   

At this point, a word must be said about us the peopleabout us the "ordinary" American people:

About the Reds who may not realize the way they're played by the likes of Perino and Watters. About the Blues who may not notice the way their own corporate leaders refuse to report and discuss the terrible plight into which we've been thrown by the spread of corporate entities like Fox, along with the rise of a podcast world built on this basic bromide: 

Every flyweight a king!

"No people are uninteresting," Yevtushenko passionately said. When a person dies, "what has gone is not nothing," this poet was willing to say.

He was thinking of the millions of "ordinary" people who lost their lives in the several madnesses which swept Europe in the middle of the last century.   

For the record, Yevtushenko had his detractors too. Years later, Robert Redford directed a deeply humane film called Ordinary People, followed by a second deeply humane film which further explored the lives of a similar group of such people. 

In that second film, a suffering teenage girl was badly in need of helpand she got it from a deeply humane older person. That Montana resident had special gifts, but he was an ordinary person too. 

There's no such thing as an "ordinary" person, Yevtushenko seemed to say. That said, we the peopleordinary allare almost always in need of some help.  

We need the help of people with gifts. We need the help of people with insight and wisdom.

We need the help of moral and intellectual leaders. In place of help from people like those, the Fox News Channelthe fruit of a poisoned "democratization"sends us Perino, Watters and Gutfeld each day, with Kat Timpf and the former "wrestler" dragging us down every night.

Last Saturday morning, at 7 a.m., C-Span's Washinton Journal began taking phone calls from us the American people. The callers are a self-selected group. They aren't a representative sample, extent to the extent that they possibly are.

On this occasion, it largely fell to people who tilted Blue to remind us of the fact that we the people, all of us, are almost always in need of help. We need to be led away from the irrational ideas which sometimes pop into our imperfect heads. 

In the film we've mentioned above, a suffering teenage girl needed the help of an empathic whisperer. On Saturday morning, quite a few callers, apparently from Blue America, were saying the events of the previous night had been staged.

Had someone tried to race past security at the Washington Hilton and stage an assault on President Trump or perhaps on Trump officials?

"I believe it was a fake attack," a caller from South Carolina soon said. Unhelpful, irrational ideas of that type can emerge, with remarkable speed, from us the American people.  

"I believe it was a fake attack?" Quite a few callers made similar comments like that during the program's first hour. Not far into the 8 o'clock hour, a caller from Michigan asked this about the previous night's event:

"Could it be that it was a law enforcement training exercise?"

Well no, it almost certainly wasn't! But ideas like that have a way of popping into our heads!

(Late in the 7 o'clock hour, a caller from Maryland took a different approach. She ridiculed those of us who "still believe that the January 6 thing was real.")

Over at the Fox News Channel, people like Perino help Watters and Gutfeld drive the disunion along. On The Five, Emily Compagno is now telling viewers that any events which may have seemed to feature violence or hatred on the part of MAGA types were really the equivalent of false flag events. They were all produced by the SPLC, Emily Compagno has now told the world, or something dimly like that.

Can anything like a union survive in the face of assaults of that type? Can anything like a union survive in the face of Blue American silence?

Attention, C-Span callers: On Sunday morning, Washington Journal took several hours of phone calls. You can watch and listen here.

"I believe it was a fake attack?" You can hear that call at 7:14. The next caller says she agrees.

Quite a few of us the people thought the attack at the Hilton seemed to be staged or fake. Many of these are good, decent people. That said, we the people can almost always benefit from good, sound people providing good, sound leadership in the form of their badly needed wisdom and general help.

Our broadcasters and presidents have sometimes done that. Other times, not so much!


44 comments:

  1. Somerby says: "...Elisabeth Bumiller reports the current state of our breakaway nation's rapidly failing union"

    Our union is not failing, rapidly or otherwise. The link Somerby provides is only about the state dinner -- nothing about our nation failing.

    It is disgusting when Somerby repeats this claim, especially given that the evidence he provides of Republican petty partisan behavior is NOT evidence that our government or nation is failing.

    What does Somerby gain by making these disparaging remarks? It is unclear, but perhaps he means to discourage Democrats or convince young people that there is no point to fighting Republican attacks on our party. Perhaps he wants to convince us we have nothing to gain by fighting Trump and Republican assaults on democracy.

    Who knows what Somerby thinks he is doing with this crap. Whatever his reasons, Trump may be destroying whatever he can get his hands on, but our nation is sufficiently robust to withstand Trump's looting. He will leave office and we will then restore what he has broken. That means that our government is not "failing" as Somerby says, but simply waiting out the most incompetent figure ever to hold office until we can remove the gold ticky tacky and spackle over the holes he has put in the walls of government.

    Donald Trump is failing, not our nation. We are stronger together than anything Trump can dish out. That Somerby cannot see that is Somerby's problem. It has been a long time since Somerby has written anything worth reading, but today's essay shows how silly he has become. His slangy references to the King of England sound like Maureen Dowd, someone he used to criticize not imitate, and his claims that we are failing as country are negativity run amok. Somerby is used up and it is time for him to quit, since he obviously has nothing to say that will help our situation.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. "Our union is not failing, rapidly or otherwise."

      I beg to differ.

      US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth has argued that the clock has paused on a deadline for the Trump administration to seek approval from Congress for the US-Israeli war with Iran.

      Refugee from the weekend Fox NOOZ morning show and occasional rapist and neo-nazi, now serving as Secretary of War has declared that he doesn't intend to follow the war powers act, because - say it with me -

      Fuck us, what are we going to do about it!

      Delete
    2. You forgot former (or “former”) alcoholic.

      Delete
    3. These assholes are not our union. This particular one is a war criminal.

      Delete
    4. The crude orange man has proven we don't have a union anymore. He ostentatiously and proudly wipes his ass with our Constitution in broad daylight. He campaigned on promising a terrorizing retribution agenda (and is following thru on his promise) after attempting an insurrection and 74 million happily said, yeah, we want that. Fuck this. There are structural institutional reasons the party of pedophiles and fascists will always rule. The Orange Abomination will leave office having at least 5 gruesome appointees ruling our lives from the Supreme Court, for at least another quarter of century. Contemplate the horror of that reality.

      Delete
    5. He is just one man. He will die and then our country can recover. Your math on the Supreme Court is wrong. The conservatives are too old to live another 25 years themselves.

      Don't underestimate the blue wave that will hit in these midterms, regardless of right wing attempts to stop it. Then Trump will be impeached. Democrats in Congress will not roll over for Trump the way the Republicans have. But given Trump's health issues, I do not believe he will live to the end of his term.

      Somerby wants us to despair so that our will to change will be replaced by apathy and nihilism. That isn't happening either. He wants us to feel fear so that we will be drawn to right wing messages. Instead, most of us feel anger and anger motivates change.

      Delete
    6. Alito and Thomas will be replaced before orange abomination leaves.

      He is just one man who has been aided and abetted by the entire republican party belonging to what was formerly known as Congress, which orange man pees on at will, and the chorus replies, "thank you, king, may we have another".

      It will take half a century to erase orange man's obscene face from all the places he is planting his flag.

      Delete
    7. I’m afraid I tend to agree with 11:17. A major political party, the GOP, isn’t going to suddenly revert to electing “normal” candidates. They’ve had a taste of Republican authoritarianism, accompanied by blatant grifting and lying. I don’t see how they return to sanity. Trump is an utter abomination, but they worship him.

      Delete
    8. The GOP won't be the majority party in congress much longer. Voters are rejecting them.

      Delete
    9. From Jamelle Bouie [Alternet]:

      "There are, says Bouie, solutions.

      As the Republican Party is dragged down by the wildly unpopular President Donald Trump, there is a strong chance the Democrats will have a supermajority in 2029. “In that environment, Court reform must be table stakes. There’s no other choice. No other option. The rest of the agenda is simply not possible without court reform.”

      Bouie says the court should be expanded in terms of the number of justices, but also the number of circuits and justices associated with circuits. He says there is too much power concentrated in the court, and one tool to reduce it is jurisdiction stripping, which is permitted under the Constitution. Congress can say that the court simply cannot adjudicate particular issues. Congress should also impose ethics reform on the court and put sharp limits on justices’ abilities to benefit financially.

      He also suggests more radical options “that really would break up the power of the court and cut the court back down to size, to remind it that it doesn’t stand above the entire American system of a council of Kings.” He suggests the court’s building be turned into a museum of sorts, and the court returns to its original place — a basement in Congress. He argues that the court should lose its ability to select its own clerks and cases.

      All of these powers were extended by Congress in the first place, and “what Congress can give, Congress can take away.”

      The Constitution only says that there “shall be a supreme court,” but defines a very narrow original jurisdiction. Bouie says the U.S. should constitutionally restrict the court to its original jurisdiction and end its ability to hear appeals. That would mean creating a new national appeals court comprised of judges from all the existing courts. Each circuit would send two judges to the appeals court, and a random panel would hear cases.

      And if that’s too extreme, Bouie says at the very least, Democrats should expand the court to 21 justices, have them hear cases based on randomly selected panels.

      “The goal is to make it weaker,” says Bouie. “The goal is to make it more difficult to game the court’s decision-making. The goal is to uncaptured the court. To transform it into an actual court, and not some tool of partisan and ideological control.”

      Delete
    10. 1) Guillotines
      2) Bodies of the leaders hanging upside down at gas stations---as a warning to others.
      3.) Lifetime prison sentences (in general population) for the enablers.

      Delete
    11. Are you all paying attention to what is going on? Dems already impeached the abomination twice, and now the party of fascism is busily erasing history and handing out taxpayer dollars to insurrectionists! Meanwhile they are indicting Mr. Clean James Comey cause king chickenshit said so.

      Have you driven thru downtown DC lately and noticed the fucking giant banners of Chairman Trump hanging from government buildings? I have, and it’s fucking creepy. And I want my Kennedy Center back for the love of Christ

      Delete
  2. "Can "we the people" hope to attain "a more perfect union" when this channel continues to roll out clown cars filled with D-list comedians, former professional "wrestlers" and an endless assortment of Unrecognizables, topped by the towel-snapping apparent misogyny of Watters and Gutfeld?"

    Why does Somerby conflate these failed D-list comics with our nation? That are not part of the government and barely part of American culture. Even if they dominate Fox and cable, they are not admired or even watched by most people in our nation. And WE are not failing as a people simply because they are poor at their job as entertainers.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Today's rant was not worth reading.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Here is Digby's take on the American zeitgeist:

    https://digbysblog.net/2026/04/30/the-dismal-zeitgeist/

    This is also what a real political analyst says about the state of our nation, not Somerby's ridiculous farce of a blog.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Digby's longtime point is the exact same as Bob's: Are we going to survive this insanity?

      You Bob-haters here, you're not for real, are you.

      Delete
    2. That's like saying Hitler and Jews agreed, one needs food to eat and air to breathe in order to survive.

      You Bob fanboys here, you're not for real, are you.

      Delete
  5. The problem is that this administration and this DOJ engage in blatant lying, so it’s reasonable to distrust their version of things. Do we really know all the details about the alleged shooter? I would say no. Can you trust the legal filings from this DOJ, or the public statements of the FBI director?

    Maybe it’s silly to believe the event was staged, but then again when you have liars in charge, clear con men and charlatans, it isn’t obviously silly.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Jeanine Pirro says the forensic analysis is not yet complete, but she assures us the shot was not friendly fire. These people don't care what they say.

      Delete
    2. To be fair, Pirro is in a constant state of inebriation, so can not be completely held responsible for all the dumbshit things she says.

      Delete
  6. Tiedrich says:

    "as Preznit Fuckwit’s unwinnable don’t-you-dare-call-it-a-war on Iran drags on, bringing uncertainty and economic chaos in its wake, his enablers in the Donnyverse have a clear message for We the People: soaring inflation and unaffordable goods and services are just small price we pay for the privilege of living in a fascist kleptocracy headed by a racist imbecile in steep cognitive decline."

    Meanwhile, Trump thinks he has served three terms in office:

    "...I took the Exam three times during my ("THREE!") Terms as President and ACED IT ALL THREE TIMES..."

    Trump is the problem, not our "failing union" as Somerby claims. Some idiot voters put a senile asshole into office because they thought it would make them wealthier, but it isn't working out that way. Time to correct that mistake.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Racism is the problem.
      It's been embedded in the nation's DNA (and Constitution) since the beginning.

      Delete
    2. Not every Republican is as corrupt as Trump but they all are racists; racism is a defining feature of modern Republicans.

      Trump, Republicans, and racism are all major drags on our society; however, there are even more fundamental root causes for the mess we are in.

      Delete
  7. Today is May Day. On a day when there will be hundreds of hundreds of protests nationwide, on workers rights, in support of labor unions and on immigration, Somerby says our union is failing. I guess he is not planning to join any of the marches himself, which would make his negative remark a self-fulfilling prophecy, if anyone ever listened to him. Thank God they don't. Assholes predicting doom and gloom have never changed anything, not even their own underwear.

    ReplyDelete
  8. “ making them the two most-watched personalities in the cable news business. ”

    It would appear that the problem isn’t just Gutfeld and Watters.

    ReplyDelete
  9. There is growing criticism of Scott Jennings on CNN. Why doesn't Somerby follow that controversy?

    "During a heated discussion on a CNN panel that included host Abby Phillips, Alan Mockler and Geraldo Rivera, among others, Mockler forcefully tore apart Jennings' talking points — noting that the war "is going to put us trillions and trillions of dollars more in debt" and arguing that the war is "failing" and "not going your way."

    Jennings grew angry, accusing Mockler of having "the attention span of a gnat." And he told Mockler to "get your f–– hand out of my face."

    X, formerly Twitter, is full of posts calling out Jennings' antics.

    Rodrick Bostick is among the X users frustrated by Jennings, posting, on May 1, "Ladies and Gentlemen, this is what you call a trend in unprofessional behavior. How much longer is @CNN going to allow such thuggish conduct from Scott Jennings before it decides to take action. #CNN."

    Democratic strategist Julie Roginsky, in a May 1 tweet, argued, "Said it before and I will say it again: CNN beclowns itself by platforming Jennings. The many serious journalists there are tarnished by having to share a network with this unserious, insecure Trump proctologist."

    [Alternet]

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. That Somerby only discusses Gutfeld on Fox and conservative talking points suggests he is not actually a media analyst (or muser) but is assigned to advance Fox and its talking points as a paid influencer.

      Delete
    2. You're insane. Or, sponsored by someone.

      Delete
    3. I saw what Somerby did there.

      Delete
    4. Spot on, 11:59.

      Delete
  10. 3.8 million might be a large viewership in cable news terms, but it still means that about 99 percent of the country isn’t watching.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Bob does not understand tv ratings, Bob has blinders on when it comes to the significance of independent media (which dwarfs Fox News viewership), and Bob pretends to be unaware that as Fox News dominates other corporate media (granted, a diminishing slice of the pie) Trump's popularity has tanked and he is now the least popular president in modern history.

      Bob's analyses are not just poor, they are silly.

      Delete
  11. "President Donald Trump has nominated yet another Fox News pundit for a major position in his administration.

    He announced Thursday that he’s chosen Nicole Saphier as his pick to be surgeon general. Saphier distinguished herself at Fox as one of the biggest medical misinformers on COVID-19 and a shameless shill for Trump." [Daily Kos]

    There is a movement on the right to blame health issues on poor lifestyle choices. That doesn't make such issues less real, nor does it mean that illness can be cured via lifestyle changes. But it is an excuse for right wingers to avoid responsibility for health care and especially health insurance. Trump has been attacking medical research, canceling grants and firing actual scientists and doctors.

    That should concern all of us. Somerby used to discuss health care costs but he hasn't commented at all on this right wing approach that abandons people when they have serious health needs and pretends people cause their own diseases.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The Republican Party:
      We are ghouls.

      The Media:
      Sometimes, you have to wonder what's behind the actions of the GOP.

      Delete
  12. Sometimes juxtapositions are instructive:

    “Bessent Wants Americans to Avoid Easy Money Traps”

    “Trump Family Amasses $5 Billion Fortune After Crypto Launch”

    ReplyDelete
  13. “Among the more than 100 guests were at least 10 American billionaires, six Fox News hosts, one Fox News executive, six conservative Supreme Court justices, numerous Silicon Valley tech titans and assorted friends of the president’s. There were no British cultural figures and, for that matter, a meager number of British overall.”


    Sure as shit doesn’t bring back memories of JFK and Camelot

    ReplyDelete
  14. In America there is no royalty. So-called "kings" and "queens" are just ordinary people here. They're free to think of themselves as special, but I don't have to accord them special treatment.

    This is parallel to so-called "trans" people. A person who's physically male in every way is free to imagine that he's a woman. He's free to wear woman's clothes. But, my institutions don't have to treat this person as if he were a woman.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Go fuck yourself, dickhead, what the fuck is wrong with you attacking people who never done you any fucking harm. The first refuge of you fucking nasty ass fascist is to find a target - today it is trans. Go fuck yourself straight to fucking hell.

      Delete
    2. All Republican voters are free to imagine they aren't mouth-breathing ignorant bigots but my institutions don't have to treat these individuals as humans.

      Delete
    3. 12:53,
      Treating them as human just encourages them.

      Delete
    4. They can believe anything they read in the Torah, but that doesn't mean they aren't blood-sucking vampires.

      Isn't this fun, David?

      Delete
  15. Top Republican strategist:

    You start out in 1954 by saying, “Nigger, nigger, nigger.” By 1968 you can’t say “nigger”—that hurts you, backfires. So you say stuff like, uh, forced busing, states’ rights, and all that stuff, and you’re getting so abstract. Now, you’re talking about cutting taxes, and all these things you’re talking about are totally economic things and a byproduct of them is, blacks get hurt worse than whites.… “We want to cut this,” is much more abstract than even the busing thing, uh, and a hell of a lot more abstract than “Nigger, nigger.”

    ReplyDelete