THURSDAY, JUNE 25, 2026
Every know-nothing a king: Where did Covid-19 come from? What was the origin of the virus?
On Tuesday night, the Fox News Channel assembled a group of specialists to discuss such matters on Gutfeld!
Except wait a minute—actually, no! This was the gaggle of experts which loudmouthed on the first segment of that evening's show:
Gutfeld!: June 23, 2026
Joe DeVito: comedian
Kat Timpf: comedian
Greg Gutfeld: host
Brian Kilmeade: co-host, Fox & Friends
Tom Shillue: comedian
Three comedians, plus one Fox "friend!" With an expert panel like that on hand, how could the analysis go wrong?
In yesterday afternoon's report, we suggested that the analysis had perhaps gone very wrong. The following morning, on Fox Business, Peter Navarro discussed the same topic, seeming to channel the various points the comedian/experts had elucidated the night before.
For David Gilmour's report, click here. Here's part of what Navarro said on Mornings with Maria:
NAVARRO (6/24/26): The American people need to de-canonize "Saint Fauci."
What we know very clearly is that Fauci played God. He basically gave money to the Wuhan lab for the express purpose of using gain-of-function research to create a deadly virus for the purpose of then creating vaccines to kill the virus.
How did that go, Anthony?
And then, when that thing leaked from the lab, he conducted a misinformation campaign, using some of the most prestigious academics in the world, to insist that it wasn’t from the lab, it was the zoonotic theory – from nature. And the biggest lie of omission was the fact that he funded the virus to begin with.
One million Americans died, millions worldwide! He needs to be held accountable.
It almost seems like Navarro is getting his stuff from comedian Tom Shillue!
Full disclosure! We know of no reason to believe that any of Navarro's accusations are accurate. According to the leading authority, Navarro's performance with respect to Covid in real time proceeded along like this:
Peter Navarro
[...]
On March 27, 2020, [President] Trump appointed Navarro to coordinate the federal government's Defense Production Act policy response during the coronavirus pandemic. In this position, Navarro promoted domestic production of coronavirus-related supplies in addition to a general nationalist agenda...
In February 2020, biologist Steven Hatfill became Navarro's advisor with regard to the coronavirus pandemic. Hatfill was a strong promoter of the malaria drug hydroxychloroquine as a treatment for COVID, even though the drug's effectiveness was unproven. By April, Navarro, and the president himself, were touting the drug as a lifesaver. Navarro clashed with Anthony Fauci, the director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, over whether the administration should promote the use of hydroxychloroquine to treat the virus. In July 2020, Navarro touted a widely criticized study as showing that hydroxychloroquine was an effective coronavirus treatment; public health experts pointed to limitations with the study and to the fact that multiple randomized controlled trials failed to conclude that hydroxychloroquine was an effective treatment.
In May 2020, Navarro criticized stay-at-home orders, arguing that the COVID-19 lockdowns would kill "many more" people than the coronavirus. He frequently referred to the virus as the "China virus" or the "CCP virus" and, in May 2020, accused the Chinese government of sending Chinese citizens to other countries to "seed" the virus. In July 2020, USA Today published an editorial by Navarro under the headline "Anthony Fauci has been wrong about everything I have interacted with him on," after which White House officials disavowed Navarro's attacks. Under criticism for the editorial, the newspaper later published an apologetic statement that read, in part, "several of Navarro's criticisms of Fauci – on the China travel restrictions, the risk from the coronavirus and falling mortality rates – were misleading or lacked context. As such, Navarro's op-ed did not meet USA Today's fact-checking standards."
You know—basic stuff like that! On a topic which may be easier to assess, Navarro soon moved on to such brilliance as this:
In October 2020, two weeks before the presidential elections, Navarro's office in the White House had begun preparing allegations of election fraud. In December 2020, Navarro published a report alleging widespread election fraud. The report repeated discredited conspiracy theories claiming election fraud, including allegations that had been dismissed by the courts and Trump's own election security task force...
On January 2, 2021, Navarro, along with Rudy Giuliani and Mark Meadows, participated in a call with Georgia election officials in which Trump urged them to overturn the results of the election. During a January 2, 2021, appearance on Jeanine Pirro's Fox News program, Navarro asserted, "[t]hey stole this and we can prove it," and falsely asserted Joe Biden's inauguration could be postponed to allow for an investigation.
"We can prove it," the firebrand said. More than five years later, no one has even tried to present evidence in support of this never-ending inflammatory claim.
For ourselves, we'd be very slow to assume that Navarro is right about anything regarding Covid. We can think of zero reason to assume that Gutfeld's panelists knew what they were talking about in their astonishing presentation on Tuesday night.
Three comedians, plus one "friend!" It never seemed to occur to Gutfeld that it might be a little bit strange to drag a group of comedians out to issue inflammatory claims about such a difficult technical matter. He made no attempt to examine a basic question:
Do these mutts have ANY idea what they're talking about? Why should anyone think that they do?
On the one hand, this is a description of the present-day Fox News Channel at work, operating in a world where they get a total pass from Blue America's high-end mainstream news orgs.
Also, this is the "democratization of media" in full flower, with every potty-mouthed non-specialist nitwit now fashioned as a king.
"Do these mutts have ANY idea what they're talking about? Why should anyone think that they do?"
ReplyDeleteIs it necessary to call the performers on Gutfeld's show "mutts" instead of comedians?
Mutt definition: " A silly, careless, or foolish person. When applied to people, it can act as an insult regarding mixed backgrounds, though it is frequently reclaimed and used as a term of endearment or a self-referential joke among diverse communities."
While Gutfeld's panel are certainly ignorant and uneducated on technical topics, are they really "silly, careless or foolish"? Are they mixed-breed humans? Words matter. Why not call them what they are -- uninformed propagandists promoting right wing political views?
It does not help anyone think clearly about a topic when you use words that imply a different flaw than exists among these people.
To Somerby's credit, his review of Navarro's role in Trump's botched covid response and his description of the right wing propaganda position is helpful to those who were not around in 2020 to watch this in slow motion. But the problem is that FOX is a propaganda outlet and Gutfeld and his crew are paid propagandists for the right, not comedians much less experts on any topic.
Blue America understand this stuff about Gutfeld, even if Somerby doesn't. We do not have to debunk Gutfeld because no one in Blue America watches that show. The right is targeting Fauci again, for political reasons. Our focus on the left must be on electing Democratic congress members and state-level officials in the midterms and removing Trump ASAP and electing a Democrat in 2028. Somerby has never talked about removing Trump or electing Democrats, so it is hard to see how he thinks this essay helps anything at all in Blue America.
I am sure that women everywhere appreciate the way Somerby repeats Gutfeld's sexist remarks, such as that women resemble whales. I met a whale once and it didn't look anything like a woman. What is Somerby's proposed solution to the problem of right-wing propaganda?
You're too dumb to live.
DeleteAmerican, most likely.
Delete"with every potty-mouthed non-specialist nitwit now fashioned as a king"
ReplyDeletepotty-mouthed? Would the things said by Gutfeld et al. be more acceptable if they used G-rated language?
Are only specialists allowed to talk about things? I think people should be careful when referring to technical things, prepared to quote specialist sources if challlenged, but why should technical topics be limited to only specialists? I have seen plenty of experts appearing on Blue media to debunk the plainly politically motivated conspiracy theories of the right. The real experts stay in the labs, working overtime to produce vaccines and cures, and I wouldn't waste their time refuting Fox lies, but those rebutting the bad info performed a real service during covid and today too, given that our world is more technical, not less these days.
No one in their right mind would consider Gutfeld an expert, so why is Somerby complaining about that show and not just recognizing that it is all bunk over there?
If someone is not prepared to critically evaluate what they hear in the media, they might adopt the policy of believing nothing said by right wingers and only believing what is said on reputable shows and sources. But right wingers won't do that, will they? The feel-good news for the right is on Fox and similar right wing outlets. Somerby needs to be preaching to them, not us over here in Blue America. We weren't the ones taking ivermectin.
Believing bad health info is producing worse health outcomes for the right than the left, beyond what happened during covid, because the right still listens to bogus info:
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41562-026-02474-9
That is a serious problem but Somerby doesn't seem to have any ideas about how to address it to help Red America. We on the left are doing fine.
Dumbass
Delete"It never seemed to occur to Gutfeld that it might be a little bit strange to drag a group of comedians out to issue inflammatory claims about such a difficult technical matter."
ReplyDeleteSomerby has worked in professional comedy himself. Why does he think that Gutfeld chooses his own material, hires his own guests or has any input into the content of his show's propaganda topics?
As a viewer, would you select your favorite comedy watching based on whether they were joking about covid and Fauci or whales and women? Fox viewers are there to have their prejudices confirmed by entertainers who create a like-minded community that affirms their own conspiracy theories. Geekier viewers are watching podcasts. There are some technical guys debunking right wing stupidity on YouTube, such as Professor Dave:
https://www.youtube.com/professordaveexplains
Cool, you found another website!
DeleteWhat a dumbfuck
Yeah, heh heh 7:09. What we should be worrying about is Gutfeld saying the women of The View resemble a bunch of whales. Definitely not a dumbfuck thing to focus on or write blogs about.
DeletePostmaster General David Steiner told lawmakers Wednesday that the U.S. Postal Service will no longer deliver mail-in ballots in states that refuse to provide sensitive voter data to the federal government, in line with a proposed rule from the Trump administration.
ReplyDeleteSteiner defended the measure at a Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee hearing, saying it was to ensure that “the right ballots are going to the right people” after Senate Democrats aired concerns about the proposal.
Because fuck us, what are we going to do about it.
LOL, when told this is unconstitutional, Steiner replied:
"Donald Trump is the kindest, bravest, warmest, most wonderful human being I've ever known in my life"
Kim Jong Un is jealous.
DeleteAnd he should be, he doesn’t have the Grand Wizard of the SC behind
DeleteBehind him
DeleteKim Jong Un is a mutt.
DeleteJoan Rivers was a mutt.
DeleteCecelia is not a mutt.
DeleteI can’t decide which is more important, the ladies of the View being called whales or Fauci accused of mass murder.
ReplyDelete