WEDNESDAY: Gabbard performed her final document dump!

WEDNESDAY, JUNE 24, 2026

Suzanne Scott took over from there: Just when you think you've seen it all, it turns out that you actually haven't. We refer to the remarkable claims made in the opening segment of last night's Gutfeld! program.   

The program started in typical fashion, with a handful of jokes on the standard smut-rich themes. One joke compared the women of The View to whales. 

Then too, viewers were handed the standard critique of Nancy Pelosi: 

GUTFELD (6/23/26): In economic news, Nancy Pelosi's net worth is down $8 million. 

Worse, her boobs are down nine inches.  

PHOTO: Pelosi in bathing suit 

Yes, that was one of the jokes. The studio audience laughed. 

This is the garbage can CEO Suzanne Scott opens each night on the Fox News Channel. Given the uniform silence of Blue America's major news orgs, this is also the garbage can our morally vacant Blue elites have uniformly chosen.   

Mercifully, this swill was concluded by 10:03. At that point, the host of the show started his "issue monologue" for the program's opening segment. 

For reasons which may seem weirdly obvious, Fox producers dropped all but the last two minutes from the videotape of the monologue which they posted on YouTube. As you can see by clicking here, that monologue started at 10:03, and it started like this:   

GUTFELD (6/23/26): All right. So on her way out the door, Tulsi Gabbard drops a nuclear document dump exposing Anthony Fauci's filthy legacy. And the mainstream press, those gutless, ball-less, nut-less, tit-less traitors, treat it like two points on a driver's license.   

That's what this nutcase said. 

Sounding a bit like a North Korean propaganda writer, the cable star said that Gabbard had exposed Dr. Fauci's "filthy legacy." But the tit-less traitors in the mainstream press were refusing to report what she'd done!

That's the way the cable star talks, and that's the way he started. Once again, it was time for Gutfeld and his all-star panel to brand Dr. Fauci as a mass murderer who needs to be shipped off to prison.  

The discussion had been triggered by Gabbard's latest, and mercifully last, document dump as DNI—a document dump which Fox News Digital has largely ignored, perhaps for obvious reasons, along with their nut-less associates in the treasonous mainstream press.

For the record, Gabbard's latest document dump, and her accompanying accusations, have been fact-checked by CNN's Daniel Dale (just click here) and, in greater detail, by Lawfare's Renée DiResta (click this). On the other hand, Gutfeld had comedian Joe DeVito on hand, and DeVito told the world this: 

DIPAOLO: I think, look—we were all locked down all this time [during Covid]. He should be locked down for a while too. 

He should be put in jail. I just wish I had faith that would happen, but when it comes to serial killers, seven million is a pretty good score—way better than Jeffrey Dahmer or Ted Bundy. That's the company Anthony Fauci is in.  

Yes, that's what he said. We know of no reason to believe that DeVito, or anyone else on Gutfeld's panel, had any idea what they were talking about—had any realistic way of offering a serious analysis of the complex subject matter involved in this endless hunt.  

For the record Gutfeld's panel was composed of three comedians, plus Fox & Friends co-host Brian Kilmeade. As is the requirement on this imitation of life, all four voiced agreement with the indictment voiced by the program's host in the opening monologue==the monologue the Fox News Channel didn't seem to want to post.

Having said these things, we'll now strongly suggest that you should watch the presentation by comedian Tom Shillue, the panelist to whom Gutfeld turned first. You can do so by clicking here, then by continuing to click as Shillue's astounding indictment of Fauci proceeds. 

We know of no reason to believe that Shillue knows what he's talking about in any serious way. As for Gabbard herself, let us offer this excerpt from DiResta's fact check for Lawfare:  

DIRESTA (6/23/26): Gabbard’s “Fauci Files" follow the same playbook as her past document drops: Put the desired conclusion in the headline. Use “declassification” as a credibility signal. Present a large, mixed dump of documents as if they were a prosecutor’s exhibit. Convert ordinary government processes—expert consultation, grant oversight, whistleblower routing, intelligence disagreement—into evidence of conspiracy. Then push the accusation on social media, where few people will read the underlying documents closely enough to notice the gulf between the documents and the claims. 

Gabbard played this game of innuendo and accusation with her so-called “Russiagate” declassifications, accusing President Barack Obama of a "treasonous conspiracy” and “coup” (he has yet to be charged). A few weeks ago she followed the playbook with a document dump on biolabs, reframing biological threat reduction work, much of which was already public, as nefarious. In each case, the underlying materials contain some facts, but they are often decontextualized, and the framing asks readers to take a much larger conspiratorial leap.   

And so on, at length, from there. Needless to say, Gabbard's earlier claim—her dramatic claim that President Obama engaged in treason—still hasn't been acted on. We're going to guess that this latest effort is headed for the dumpster too, except on the truly deranged imitation of "cable news" performed on the Fox News Channel.    

We'll close by stating the obvious. The issues here are too complex to be accessible to all but a handful of citizens. In such circumstances, analysis becomes a game of "Who Do You Trust?"   

Gutfeld tells millions of people that they shouldn't trust the work of the tit-less traitors found in the mainstream press. Also, Rep. Pelosi's boobs have fallen nine inches, and the women of The Views are so fat they resemble whales. 

Suzanne Scott puts this swill on the air. Rachek Maddow won't say a word, Neither will the New York Times, or the Atlantic, or any of the opinion writers at those citadels of the Blue press.

Seriously—go watch what Tom Shillue said! This is the "democratization of media" at its craziest and most dangerous.  

We leave you today with a question. Has a nation which tolerates this gong-show conduct already become a failed state?