THURSDAY, JULY 9, 2026
...when "the people" align in tribes? Of the people? By the people? Can a government like that "long endure?"
Speaking at Gettysburg, President Lincoln understood that some observers around the world weren't especially sure. He closed his brief remarks that day by saying that those present should dedicate themselves to the task of ensuring that government of the people "shall not perish from the earth."
Today, we're engaged in a great civil war—a tribal war marked by vast clowning. For an example of what we mean, consider what happened on CNN last night.
Midway through the 8 o'clock hour, Anderson Cooper spoke with a three member panel concerning Graham Platner's apparent withdrawal from the Maine Senate race.
Cooper played substantial chunks of Platner's taped statement. He then threw to Gretchen Carlson, a former Fox News Channel host.
We the people should be grateful to Carlson. The leading authority explains:
Gretchen Carlson
Gretchen Elizabeth Carlson (born June 21, 1966) is an American broadcast journalist, writer, and television personality.
Carlson was born and raised in Minnesota. A talented youth violinist, Carlson competed in a number of music contests before becoming a beauty pageant contestant. After winning Miss Minnesota in 1988, Carlson became Miss America for 1989. She attended Stanford University and graduated in 1990.
[...]
In July 2016, Carlson filed a lawsuit against then Fox News chairman and CEO Roger Ailes, claiming sexual harassment. Subsequently, dozens of other women also stepped forward to accuse Ailes of harassment, and Ailes resigned under pressure. In September 2016 Carlson and 21st Century Fox settled the lawsuit reportedly for $20 million, and Carlson received a public apology. Carlson was one of the first high-publicity cases of 2016's #MeToo movement.
In 2019 she co-founded Lift Our Voices to work towards a ban on non-disclosure agreements (NDAs) and forced arbitration clauses in employment agreements. In February 2022, the U.S. Congress passed the Ending Forced Arbitration of Sexual Assault and Sexual Harassment Act, a law championed by Carlson which excludes sexual assault and sexual harassment complaints from arbitration clauses, including retroactively. On March 3, 2022, President Joe Biden signed the bill into law. On December 7, 2022, he also signed the Speak Out Act, another bill backed by Carlson.
And so on, at length, from there.
In our view, we the people should be grateful to Carlson. That doesn't mean that she has perfect judgment because, of course, nobody does.
Last evening, Cooper threw to Carlson first. Below, you see what she said:
COOPER (7/8/26): Gretchen Carlson, Platner still denies the allegations. How do you think his statement is going to be received? What do you— What are your thoughts right now?
CARLSON: That [videotaped statement] was a disgusting display of hubris that every woman and man in America should be incredibly upset about. Regular people do not abuse women. It's always somebody else to blame. It's typical cry of assaulters.
His own wife turned in text messages that he was having with other women. He posted on Reddit many years ago that he believed that women should be responsible for when bad things happen to them sexually.
Not to mention the Nazi tattoos and a myriad of other things. He is conflating tonight his candidacy of being popular with being an every kind of person [sic], with accusations of rape.
That—those are two totally different things. And a real man would stand up and take accountability for what has happened here.
This movement has had immense progress over the last ten years and these women are believed. And I don't know what this display was in this video, but I wouldn't want the endorsement of Graham Platner, whoever the Democrat is, running in this race.
Some of that was hard to follow, but that's what Carlson said.
Brad Todd, a Republican strategist, was the third panel member to speak. Can the nation expect to long endure? This is what he said:
TODD: Well, I think, by the way, the race should have gone to this spot a long time ago. I mean, all those things that Gretchen just outlined are exactly true about Graham Platner, and they were true before this weekend.
If you look back at The New York Times on June the 4th, he said that if someone broke in his house, he would rape them to show them he was dominant. So we heard he was physically abusive by a corroborated story from a longtime girlfriend. But Democrats in Washington and in Maine just ignored it.
The Sheldon Whitehouse, the Senator from Rhode Island, said, "Oh, those accusations came from a Republican operator." So he didn't think they were anything to worry about. Graham Platner has been bad all the way from the start. And the only difference was this week—is on this weekend, there were polling numbers came out that showed he might be losing to Susan Collins.
His cardinal sin to get dumped by the Democratic Party is looking like he might lose. And I think that, where this race goes from here—I mean, Maine Democrats are going to pick someone else awful. They're going to pick—they like Graham Platner because he's bad. They'll pick someone else because he's bad.
... I mean, it's really just come down to raw power. Democrats will tolerate anything for raw power in Maine.
Democrats will tolerate anything, the Republican strategist said. He then made an amazing claim:
Democrats like Platner because he's bad! Also, they'll pick someone to be his replacement because [that new person] is bad!
They'll pick the new person because he or she is bad! That seems to be what Todd said.
Can a government expect to endure in the face of such tribal vehemence? We aren't sure, but there was a blindingly obvious problem with what Todd said—and Democratic Party official Christine Quinn now stepped in to say it:
COOPER (continuing directly): Christine, what do you think of what Brad said there?
QUINN: You know, first of all, I think on a day where a federal judge ordered President Trump to pay over $5 million to E. Jean Carroll for sexual assault, I just find it rich.
These Republicans and Republican leaders who are now so concerned about sexual assault and rape, when they have stood by President Trump time and time again when he has been accused of horrible sexual misdeeds.
Maybe this is a moment where everyone will start to come together and hold everyone accountable and say no one is above the law, even if they are president of the United States. But I sincerely doubt that we will see that. I think we will continue to see hypocrisy on the part of the Republicans.
It's what we mentioned yesterday, speaking about The Five. It's astounding to see people who have swallowed the sitting president's apparent sexual history suddenly expressing shock when Democrats show an inclination to look the other way regarding one of their own.
Quinn pushed back against the one-way fury of Republican strategist Todd. Yesterday afternoon, on Fox, Jessica Tarlov pushed back against guest host Trace Gallagher in a similar way.
Gallagher is a reliable (and highly skilled) partisan attack dog. As you can see at this Mediaite report, Tarlov abruptly told him this:
"The Democrats will not be lectured by the party of Donald Trump...about what good behavior is when it comes to how women are treated and questions of abuse. That is a non-starter here."
Personally, we think the time has come for Tarlov to leave The Five—to stop agreeing to play the role of designated punching bag on that ludicrous imitation of a "cable news" TV program.
That said, people like Gallagher have disappeared all manner of misconduct, sexual and otherwise, on the part of the sitting president. Their ability to blow past their double standard in this matter is truly astonishing, and Tarlov pushed back quickly and hard.
For what it's worth, we agree with something Todd said on CNN. We thought Senator Whitehouse was remarkably dismissive about earlier claims against Candidate Platner.
We were amazed and disappointed by the frivolous tone he adopted, on The Last Word, toward the June 4 New York Times report. We think less of him because of the way he reacted, and we're sorry that we do.
That said, we the people now engaged in a great tribal war—a tribal war marked by the astounding true belief performed by many of the most watched stars in this nation's "cable news" industry. That brings us back to Professor Rosen's essay for The Atlantic, which bore this dual headline:
IDEAS
American Democracy Wasn’t Designed for This
Can our 18th-century institutions survive 21st-century technology?
Even such as it has been, can our democracy expect to survive? Will it long endure?
Our guess:
Not in the face of the fury of Gallagher / Todd and so many others. Also, not in the face of what we'd call Professor Rosen's passivity.
Tomorrow: The constant refusal to speak
“Tarlov” is masculine, the feminine is “Tarlova”.
ReplyDeleteWeirdo.
DeleteDemocracy could be endangered not only by new technologies but also by a political culture where each side reflexively defends its own and attacks the other.
ReplyDeleteStop that “each side” crap. The democrats just dumped their sex pest. The republicans cling to theirs.
Delete11.14 just proved your point lol
DeleteRepublicans don’t seem to dump their sex pests, though, preferring to elect them. That’s just an objective, provable fact.
DeleteBlatant sex pests Trump and Clinton both survived scandals that would have sunk any ordinary politician. I'll be damned if I know how they did it. These two men are titans of persuasion.
DeleteGo take a flying fuck, dickhead, you fascist fuck. Trump isn’t fit to carry Clinton’s briefcase
DeleteYeah, it’s a mystery about Trump, whom you voted for three times, DiC…
DeleteDickhead explaining how he doesn’t understand why he is a trump lickspittle! lol
DeleteThere is almost zero correlation between the adult consenting sexual affairs Clinton entertained, and the rape that Trump's victims endured.
DeleteClinton left office in 2001 and couldn’t be elected today. Trump is still in office.
DeleteAnd DiC would crawl naked through a Paris sewer and then over white-hot coals to vote a 4th time for King Chickenshit.
DeleteSelf awareness is not DiC’s strong suit but if it needs to be spelled out to him , Trump got away with it because a large number of racist nimrods voted for him.
Delete"I'll be damned if I know how they did it."
DeleteTry looking in the mirror for the answer.
Hector - I know why I voted for Trump. I thought his policies would work better than Harris's. But, a majority of voters voted for Trump, even after the Jan 6 riot, the arrests and other scandals. That was an amazing result.
DeleteTrump was elected by a plurality of voters, not a majority.
DeleteDiC doesn’t even know basic facts about the last section. Not surprising.
Delete*election
DeleteIt's not just Trump.
DeleteAll businessmen are corrupt criminals.
Clearly this blog post shows that Somerby hates women, loves Trump, and is a right-wing shill...
ReplyDeleteIf you say so.
DeleteReally can't argue with that.
DeleteWhere does Somerby call for Trump's resignation because of his sexual misbehavior? Did I miss that part?
DeleteWhat we have is a Republican Party that has abdicated its stewardship of “American democracy” in favor of raw power, bending the knee to a corrupt megalomaniac. Maybe technology helps them do that, but it is still a collective, conscious decision on their part. Rosen may be misidentifying the real problem by blaming it on “technology”.
ReplyDeleteWithout technology, specifically social media, they wouldn't be able to wall themselves off from reality so easily. It's that ability that has combined with Fox news, "conservative" websites, and talk radio to allow them to live in an alternative reality.
DeleteI just recall the intense tribalism of the civil war period that led to hundreds of thousands of deaths, and that was pre-mass media or the internet. I’m not sure rosen’s theory is bulletproof.
DeleteThe Civil War was influenced strongly by the economic considerations of wealthy southerners, who were incented to maintain slavery, and the desire of white trash to have someone to clearly look down on and make themselves feel better about themselves. What are the divisions about now? Transgenders in sport? "DEI" whatever that is -- as far as I can tell, it means "something I'm mad about even though I don't know what it is." Immigration seems to be the most inflammatory issue, but both sides are more or less working to restrict immigration; it's just a difference of degree. When you look at what passes for "conservatism" today, it's a movement about grievance, but what is causing the aggrievement is so minor that it's completely illogical. The obvious reason it got to this point is people aren't getting proper information, and that's happening because it's too easy for them to get only the information they want.
DeleteThey are all such greasy fucks I just don't understand the cult saying fuck yea, corruption is good!
Delete"These include, according to the New York Times, “more than three dozen rules” relating to gun safety it is attempting to “eliminate.” These include provisions to “raise the legal threshold for revoking a dealer’s license; extend gun rights to buyers who had faced restrictions because of mental illness or inability to manage their own finances; and end extra scrutiny of stabilizing braces, gun accessories that have been used in mass shootings to lethal effect.” In other words, they have reversed all the progress made under the Biden administration, loosening regulations even more."
They also want to eliminate in person background checks so the Amazon of online gun purchases, "GrabaGun" can sell unrestricted online. WHo recently joined the GrabaGun Board of DIrectors? Don Fucking Jr. It's so blatant, and so gross. But as Newt Gingrich said, it doesn't compare with the "crime of the century" when Hunter repaid dad $7,200 for a truck loan.
These gun laws are great news for when the Republican Party tries to cut Social Security funding.
DeleteRosen offers no ideas for solving the purported problems with technology.
ReplyDeleteIf Platner were really that bad, the Republicans, the party of Trump, Gaetz, Edwards, Hegseth, Thomas, Kavanaugh and on and on and on and on would support him. In fact, he'd be a good candidate to run for president in 2028 in the GOP.
ReplyDeleteDems can kiss the Senate goodbye. That's for sure.
ReplyDeleteDo tell?
DeleteRepublicans french kiss infants.
DeleteI wonder why King Orange Chickenshit had to slink out of Turkey by ditching the plane he stole from Qatar and flying back on AF1? Anyone?
ReplyDeleteI don't waste my time thinking about things over which I don't have any control.
DeleteYou really are a disgraceful dumb sonofabitch Trump lickspittle
DeleteI also wouldn’t worry about Trump traveling in a completely insecure airplane while the Iranian regime is interested in bumping him off. What? Me worry?
DeleteI hate Trump. Dwelling obsessively about news items that you don't have any capacity to affect can lead to neuroticism and unhappiness. Which I think clearly is the case with you. But besides turning people into neurotic dingbats, wasting your time on such subjects takes away from things that you could impact and meaningful relationships that you could be engaged in. I don't dwell on that shit because it's unhealthy.
DeleteSure, maggot, that’s why you hang around a political blog.
DeleteThere are things all of us can be doing every day about the shit going on. I engage in advocacy for causes where the deck is stacked against me, but i certainly don’t sit around making myself a willing ignorant dupe of the corrupt and powerful. There’s nothing I can do directly to stop Trump’s corruption or stupidity, but there absolutely are things I can do indirectly. If you care about anything, anything at all, you don’t blithely ignore the evil around you.
DeleteThe last couple days 2 more people were murdered by ICE. As long as I have breath in my body I intend to fight that evil motherfucking fascist who is destroying my country
DeleteEver heard of Martin Niemöller, Waylon?
DeleteHow do you exert influence over which jet Trump takes? Indirectly or otherwise?
Deletewaylon,
DeleteCall one of the planes "Communist".
Of all the media you have consumed today, how much of it was connected to meaningful indirect actions? And how much of it was just repetitive consumption about a subject over which you have no control? How much of it was just giving you an illusion of participation? Name the top five actions you have taken this week to fight against Trump.
Delete"As long as I have breath in my body I intend to fight that evil motherfucking fascist who is destroying my country"
DeleteHow? By calling other people names in a comment section? You're pretending like you care. You're pretending like you're engaged. You're just using politics as a way to exercise a moral identity. You already said there's nothing you can directly do about it. You're not fighting anything. You're playing games on a message board. You're dealing with spectres and chimeras. You're living in a dream.
Our grandchildren will realize that the faux engagement of the type in which you participate is as dangerous as cigarettes and alcohol.
DeleteBy this time, you've probably wasted possibly a decade of your entire life on something that has brought you nothing. You flushed years and years and years of your life down the toilet, spinning your wheels over an illusion of participation. It's why you come across as such an angry dick.
waylon,
DeleteLook between the First and the Third Amendments, and let us know if you can see anything.
I'm a little sheepish because I did nothing to help Iran win the war on Day One.
DeleteAll of us have a bit of Luigi in us. We just need top look within our selves and feel confident in using it.
DeleteParticipating in a consumer society is a waste of time and money.
DeleteBesides, no one ever got rich cashing checks from people who didn't buy their goods or services
waylon
DeleteExactly.
Have a problem with "illegals" taking your jobs?
Instead of crying about it, work harder and become more honest.
I understand why you would completely sidestep the issue.
DeleteDoes reading and arguing about what jet Trump takes change political outcomes with comparable effectiveness that buying goods changes economic outcomes?
No one is questioning that you are more morally righteous than everyone else on the planet. Everyone knows that is true. The question is if that righteousness has achieved any concrete political outcomes. And if not, why not?
DeleteTrump took a jet?
DeleteNo one here cares about whether men abuse women.
ReplyDeleteInteresting. Where are you?
Delete