WEDNESDAY: As a tribute to waterfront values...

WEDNESDAY, OCTOBER 14, 2026

...Chekhov concocted this tale: The creepy monsters who creep and crawl have been crawling all over the modern American discourse. 

Can a large modern nation hope to survive in such desperate need of true, sustaining values?  Can some such nation hope to survive with the standard assembly of soul-damaged creeps sent out on that "cable news" channel? 

We'd expected to post this afternoon about this latest astounding behavior by the flailing American president. But instead, we'll offer Constance Garnett's influential early translation of Chekhov's spectacularly beautiful story, The Lady with the Lapdog.

Here on this campus, we prefer the David Magarshack translation for Penguin Classics. But we offer this start to the story as a tribute to the Redford character in The Horse Whisperer, and as a tribute to the way Terry and Edie create a world of better values in the undercard to On the Waterfront.

The American songbook asks this question: Who will glove your hand? In this famous scene, Terry answers that question. 

Chekhov's story starts as shown:

The Lady with the Dog  
(Constance Garnett translation)  

It was said that a new person had appeared on the sea-front: a lady with a little dog. Dmitri Dmitritch Gurov, who had by then been a fortnight at Yalta, and so was fairly at home there, had begun to take an interest in new arrivals. Sitting in Verney's pavilion, he saw, walking on the sea-front, a fair-haired young lady of medium height, wearing a béret; a white Pomeranian dog was running behind her.

And afterwards he met her in the public gardens and in the square several times a day. She was walking alone, always wearing the same béret, and always with the same white dog; no one knew who she was, and every one called her simply "the lady with the dog."

"If she is here alone without a husband or friends, it wouldn't be amiss to make her acquaintance," Gurov reflected.

He was under forty, but he had a daughter already twelve years old, and two sons at school. He had been married young, when he was a student in his second year, and by now his wife seemed half as old again as he. She was a tall, erect woman with dark eyebrows, staid and dignified, and, as she said of herself, intellectual. She read a great deal, used phonetic spelling, called her husband, not Dmitri, but Dimitri, and he secretly considered her unintelligent, narrow, inelegant, was afraid of her, and did not like to be at home. He had begun being unfaithful to her long ago—had been unfaithful to her often, and, probably on that account, he almost always spoke ill of women, and when they were talked about in his presence, used to call them "the lower race."

It seemed to him that he had been so schooled by bitter experience that he might call them what he liked, and yet he could not get on for two days together without "the lower race." In the society of men he was bored and not himself, with them he was cold and uncommunicative; but when he was in the company of women he felt free, and knew what to say to them and how to behave; and he was at ease with them even when he was silent. In his appearance, in his character, in his whole nature, there was something attractive and elusive which allured women and disposed them in his favour; he knew that, and some force seemed to draw him, too, to them.

Experience often repeated, truly bitter experience, had taught him long ago that with decent people, especially Moscow people—always slow to move and irresolute—every intimacy, which at first so agreeably diversifies life and appears a light and charming adventure, inevitably grows into a regular problem of extreme intricacy, and in the long run the situation becomes unbearable. But at every fresh meeting with an interesting woman this experience seemed to slip out of his memory, and he was eager for life, and everything seemed simple and amusing.

One evening he was dining in the gardens, and the lady in the béret came up slowly to take the next table...   

The beauty of where this story goes is truly a thing to see. 

In its time, this story was considered revolutionary for its ending—for the ending which didn't provide an ending.  Virginia Woolf wrote about the unusual ending. Nabokov called Chekhov's story one of the greatest ever written. 

We've loved this story for years. 

If we expect to survive as a nation, we have to remove the misogynist creeps from the American discourse. We also have to ask the question we've asked many times here at this site, the question about the trusted Blue American elites who refuse to report or discuss the misogyny crawling all over the Fox News Channel.

"We don't have a person to waste (Bill Clinton)." Nor do we have a whole gender,

The Magarshack translation: Writing for Penguin Classics, David Magarshack translated the opening in the manner shown:   

Lady with Lapdog
(David Marshack translation)

The appearance on the front of a new arrival—a lady with a lapdog—became the topic of general conversation...[S]he was fair, not very tall, and she wore a toque; behind her trotted a white Pomeranian. 

[...] 

And so one afternoon, while he was having dinner at a restaurant in the park, the woman in the toque walked in unhurriedly and took a seat at the table next to him...  

We have to drive the creeps from the American discourse. They deserve to get help after that.


61 comments:


  1. "If we expect to survive as a nation, we have to remove the misogynist creeps from the American discourse. "

    What Dumbocrat nonsense. Your opinion of the Fox News Channel notwithstanding, nothing has to be removed from the discourse. If you think something is missing from the discourse, bring it on. Any attempt at "removing" things, however, it just makes them stronger. Not to mention that it makes you look stupid and feeble...


    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Don't have a cow Mao.

      Delete
    2. Hillary got triggered.

      Delete
    3. This one time, 2:34 is right.

      Delete
    4. Hell no.

      Something has to account for having a soulless, brain-dead grifter twice elected President. Bob has a theory that's as valid as any other.

      Delete
    5. If Somerby's theory is that Trump is supported by men as a backlash to feminism, that may be true but it doesn't explain the racism and immigrant-hating and fascist-preferring segments of Trump's base and MAGA.

      Delete
    6. Somerby's theory is that Blues insulted Republicans while not taking their lunatic ideas seriously and this led to Trump.

      This is a nonsense theory.

      Delete
    7. Here is a better theory from Digby:

      "Lilliana Mason’s 2018 book “Uncivil Agreement” considers partisanship not the real problem. Indeed, in a journal article published this month entitled “Polarization Is Not the Problem,” the Johns Hopkins University political scientist wrote that polarization is “a symptom of a deeper struggle over who belongs and deserves equal rights.”

      Rapid recognition of rights for racial and other minorities has produced a bitter “ethnonationalist backlash” centered in the Republican Party.

      In his New York Times commentary, Edsall offers:

      “Polarization,” Mason then contended, with an artful turn of phrase,

      is therefore less the disease than democracy’s immune response to an unpopular, antidemocratic movement.

      Suppressing that response in the name of civility would only strengthen the movement and imperil pluralistic self-government. The United States can still become its most inclusive democracy, but only if leaders defend equal rights and voters hold accountable those who will not.

      Read: going along to get along defeats the founding principles of the American republic.

      Your chance to hold accountable those who will not defend equal rights for all comes on Nov. 3 this year. Make the most of it."

      Delete
    8. Exactly, in times of rising authoritarianism, you don't roll over like Somerby suggests.

      Delete
  2. Trump is Putin's lapdog.

    ReplyDelete
  3. The man in the story is himself a misogynist. He calls women the lower race. He is what we would now call a womanizer. Somerby leaves out the part that explains that once a woman becomes attached to him emotionally, he drops her and moves on. Today that is called being a "pick-up artist" in the manosphere and it is misbehavior, not in any way beautiful or worth Somerby delight in this story. The delight comes from the ending in which Dmitri falls for the woman with the lapdog but finds that she cannot be with him because she is married to someone who can ruin Dmitri, thus they are bound together but cannot be together, and there is a kind of poetic justice in that because of Dmitri's previous mistreatment of so many women who he causes to fall for him and then drops.

    Why does Somerby love this story and return to it over and over, without ever describing the irony of the ending? Today he seems to be pretending to be against misogyny while also ignoring that the main character embodies it in the story.

    An ahistoric comparison between the time when this story was written and today's attitudes would yield a different interpretation. I prefer to consider the author's intent, which was not to portray Dmitri sympathetically. (Somerby seems to pity him and believe that his marriage and his wife's intellectual deficits justify his infidelity.) Dmitri is not only physically disloyal to his wife and kids, but he is emotionally disloyal in his contempt for her, which he uses to justify his actions in pursuing and harming other women. He hates women. Does Somerby not realize that? Dmitri punishes the women he seduces as retribution against being forced into an unhappy marriage with someone he despises. The irony of the story is that he himself gets punished for his misbehavior in the same manner as he has done to women. The author does not admire this guy or pity him.

    I believe Somerby is attracted to this story because he too despises women and identifes with Dmitri. It is bizarre that he calls this a beautiful story when it is not about beauty or even love, but about character. Critics admire the story for its psychological realism (modernism).

    Somerby perhaps feels that falling in love redeems Dmitri, rather than being the means of punishing him. It isn't as if Dmitri develops empathy or regrets his past behavior when he is caught in the same bind as he has inflicted on past women. I see a lack of insight, self-awareness in Somerby's gushing over this story, year after year, with this being the first mention of misogyny. He seems to like reading a character who dislikes women as much as Somerby himself does.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Somerby may be into masochism; his subconscious is aware of his sexism and it may manifest through masochism.

      Delete


  4. What do you think about your favorite Dumbocrat channel "MS NOW", Bob? Can a large modern nation hope to survive endless fake news spewed by "MS NOW"?

    Inquiring minds want to know.

    Patel 'landed in Russia' while he was actually in Virginia.

    FBI says Patel was at a law enforcement event at Liberty University when MS NOW aired bogus report.



    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Has MS NOW retracted the report?

      Delete
    2. Checks notes... FOX paid over $750 million for lying about the election. MS NOW issued an on-air correction.

      Delete
    3. Speaking of fake news & "Patel has boasted that the FBI has arrested 54,000 violent criminals, which he describes as a 90% increase in arrests from the same period in the Biden administration. What he doesn’t mention is that his count is inflated by including arrests that state and local police forces and other federal agencies have made when an FBI employee is present.

      Many of those arrests are not FBI cases, the FBI acknowledges.

      In reality, the FBI has referred 15% fewer criminal cases for federal prosecution during the second Trump administration than during the same period in the Biden administration. And, while the FBI does not break down its criminal referrals into types of cases, the data also shows that the DOJ prosecuted 15% fewer cases of violent crimes during the first 16 months of the Trump administration than during the same period of the Biden administration.

      There were nearly 3,800 fewer people charged federally with violent crimes during the first part of the second Trump administration than during the comparable Biden period — the opposite of what Patel says. That figure includes cases referred from all federal agencies, not just the FBI."

      Delete
    4. The first part of Biden's term was during the covid lockdown. Crime was a lot lower then and reporting of crimes was disrupted. Is this a fair comparison period?

      Delete
    5. Comparison isn't important to me. It is the cooking of the data to look good. When the department is in turmoil with all their bogus firings over agents who were doing their job investigating what a God awful criminal we hade/have as President. They are screwing up everything they touch in fealty to Dear Leader.

      Delete
    6. And of course Patel lied about the firings at a hearing. They are consistent.

      Delete
    7. Patel was in fact scheduled to go to Russia 10/14-15 but the trip was suddenly canceled, probably due to outcry. The performative consternation about MSNOW is an attempt to cover up the actual context.

      CIA Director John Ratcliffe visited Moscow on August 25, 2026, and special envoys Steve Witkoff and Jared Kushner visited Moscow in early September for talks with Vladimir Putin.

      When the Patel trip to Russia was announced a few weeks ago, an article gave context:
      _________________________________
      "FBI Director Kash Patel has been given a not-so-subtle message about his purported plans for a trip to Russia as a Kremlin-friendly newspaper warns he better come bearing gifts.
      ...
      “It’s assumed that Russia has some kind of dirt on the Democrats, and we could provide it, in one form or another, to the American side,” Vladimir Vasiliev of the Russian Academy of Sciences’ Arbatov Institute for U.S. and Canadian Studies told the newspaper, speculating on the possible reasons for Patel’s visit. Vasiliev works closely with the Russian International Affairs Council, which is overseen by Vladimir Putin’s top diplomat, Sergei Lavrov, as the chairman of the board. He is widely known for spreading the Kremlin’s line in state-controlled media.

      He went on to make clear that Patel better not come empty-handed if he has a favor to ask of Putin’s security services: “At the same time, the Americans might also have something to share, seeing as the Russian side could ask, ‘What do we get in return? or inquire, ‘What do you have to say about this or that issue?’”
      ...
      His likely host would be the FSB, Russia’s powerful security service and successor to the Soviet KGB.

      Such a trip would be highly unusual for an FBI director. Robert Mueller was the last known FBI chief to visit Russia, traveling there in 2013.
      ...
      Patel could also be positioning himself as a backchannel between Donald Trump’s administration and Moscow, potentially giving him a role beyond his traditional law enforcement responsibilities, Vasiliev said, describing it as a possible bid to win influence over Trump and secure his job as FBI director. "
      ____________________________________

      The FBI has a history of being dishonest, particularly under Patel, so for all we know he may have secretly gone to Russia at some point.

      What is sort of ironic is Patel was a cheerleader for falsely framing the Russia/Trump connection as a hoax, yet here he was planning a trip that would have included Russia colluding with the Republicans to hurt Dems, yet again.

      Delete
    8. Many Democrats, including myself, are not going to vote. That's how confident we are the Blue Wave is coming.

      Delete
    9. Most Republicans will be voting for child rapists and bigots, because there is an election.

      Delete

    10. I'm curious if "MS NOW" now fired current retarded Dumbocrats posing as their "sources", and hired some new retarded Dumbocrats to play their "sources".

      Delete
    11. The no collusion asshat trolls come marching in as we watch in real time Trump and Hegseth align with the invading war criminals and allow innocent Ukraine's to die. Fuck these pieces of shit. Who the fuck cares about a redacted story while all the criming continues unabated?

      Delete
    12. Triggered, Hillary?

      Delete
    13. Luigi was triggered!

      Delete
  5. Well, which is it? What was she wearing, a béret or a toque?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Magarshack is not a native English speaker but was born in Latvia and moved to the UK. Garnett is a native English speaker but not a native Russian speaker. In addition to studying Russian she was helped by Russian emigres living in London.

      Russia is historically strongly influenced by French culture, deliberately adopted French as a language and Parisian culture as a way of modernizing the nation compared to the rest of Eastern Europe. That means that beret is most likely to be what was intended, not toque which refers to other kinds of hats she was definitely not wearing, or perhaps a pillbox hat unlikely to have been the fashion at the time. You can check that by looking at portraits or photos of fashionable Russian women of that time period (1899). Toques were worn by male peasants. A woman's hat might be called a ushanka but readers would be less familiar with the term, so perhaps beret was substituted.

      Delete
    2. “Toque” can also mean a chef’s hat. That would look silly.

      Delete
    3. I was working part time in a five-and-dime
      My boss was Mr. McGee
      He told me several times that he didn't like my kind
      'Cause I was a bit too leisurely
      Seems that I was busy doing something close to nothing
      But different than the day before
      That's when I saw her, ooh, I saw her
      She walked in through the out door, out door


      She wore a raspberry beret
      The kind you find in a second-hand store
      Raspberry beret
      And if it was warm, she wouldn't wear much more
      Raspberry beret, I think I love her

      Delete
    4. Wait till you see her in a toque.

      Delete
  6. "But instead, we'll offer Constance Garnett's influential early translation of Chekhov's spectacularly beautiful story, The Lady with the Lapdog.

    Here on this campus, we prefer the David Magarshack translation for Penguin Classics. "

    It is a bit ironic that Somerby rags on blue America for not addressing misogyny, then states that he prefers the translation of this story by the man, not the woman. Would a woman perhaps react to such a story differently than a man, influencing her word choices?

    In the paragraphs quoted, the female translator leaves in more of the complicated sentence structure, while the male translator is more Hemingway-esque in its brusqueness. The female refers to the lady with the lapdog as of "medium height" while the man calls her "not very tall". Thus his description is negative. The female translator's reference to medium height compares her, most likely, to women in general whereas the male translator calls her not very tall because he may be comparing her to men or to all people. The "not very tall" description is diminishing while the "medium height" description calls her average. Even in this small choice, the difference between choices is obvious. Yet Somerby never considers whether he likes the male translation better because it reflects more of a male viewpoint and attitude toward the male character than a female translator presented. Of course Somerby prefers the male translation. And that knee-jerk unconscious preference is also part of our society's misogyny, especially when women are shut out of participation, even in small things like who writes the short stories, and who translates them.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Chekhov was male. If female, the name would be Chekhova.

      Delete
    2. We are discussing the translators, not the author. One translator was male and the other was female.

      Delete
    3. We are discussing the author. He was male.

      Delete
    4. The commenter made a salient point about the translators.

      5:53 what point are you trying to make? No one can discern it.

      Delete
    5. No one has contested that. What is your point?

      Delete
    6. No one has contested that no one can discern your point.

      Make a point or get off the pot.

      Delete
    7. Chekhov was discernably incontestably male.

      Delete
    8. That is not a point, that is just an observation with no connection to what is being discussed.

      Make a point or get off the pot.

      Delete
    9. We are not discussing pots.

      Delete
    10. Whatever we were discussing, we are now discussing what a moron you are.

      Well played.

      Delete
    11. Somerby prefers one translation over another, thereby proving his sexism. Now I’ve heard everything.

      Delete
    12. Agree with DG this time.
      No one needs to know which translation of the book Somerby prefers, to know he's a sexist.

      Delete
    13. And the story was originally written by a male author. Somerby is sexist all the way.

      Delete
    14. One time in art class we had to discern the pot before we painted it.

      Delete
  7. Dmitri was stupid. Women are not a race.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. In that time period the word race was used more loosely. For example, it often referred to ethnicity, so Italians were a different race than the Irish. But blame the translation, since we don't know what word was used in Russian in 1899.

      Delete
  8. Crime rates have been trending downward since the 90s.

    There was a Covid-era spike, but by 2022 crime was returning to its downward trend and reaching 50 year lows.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Leaded gasoline was phased out in the 1970s.

      Delete
    2. But mama fed me paint chips when I were a baby.

      Delete
  9. File this under, "Draining the Swamp"

    The trades were, as Bloomberg reports, “eyepopping.” At 6:49 on March 23rd, traders sold contracts worth 6 million barrels of oil, which was vastly more than the volume that had been traded in recent days. Other markets were similarly affected. 15 minutes later, Trump announced on his social media site that he was calling off his plans to attack infrastructure in Iran if they didn’t open the Strait of Hormuz. Oil prices nosedived as a result. https://digbysblog.net/

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Question - why does the liberal media not scream day and night that Don's continuous stories about Johnny going to school one day and (now the stories add threes days instead of after lunch) he comes home as Jane? He says insane idiotic shit on the daily and no news organization even takes the time to laugh at the fucking asshole.

      Delete
    2. Because we are being run by a fascist regime who do not believe in democracy. The media takes note of how the AP and CNN and MSNOW and Politico are being treated. They don't want to have to go to fucking courts for the next decade to get their 1st Amendment rights validated. Hope that clears it up. This is how authoritarian fascists work, kind of like the mob that Trump worked with in the City.

      Delete

    3. Triggered by some 6-months-old-news, Hillary?

      Delete
    4. I am sorely disappointed with this administration, backing down to a bunch of gay woke liberals like they were an Iranian ayatollah. This is one Republican staying away from the polls since I can’t see a guy in a wheelchair shot in the head.

      Delete
  10. Perhaps the people who have been gaslighting us that not all Republican voters are bigots, are in mental decline.
    Meanwhile I've been looking at Republican voters with pity/ disdain since they voted for Reagan.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Can you imagine how much of a depraved sociopath you'd have to be to vote for Ronald Fucking Reagan to be President of the United States, if you weren't in mental decline?

      Delete
    2. "Stop calling all Republican voters 'sociopaths', some are just in mental decline."

      Dogface George, probably.

      Delete