SATURDAY: Mayor Mamdani spoke with Nawaz!

SATURDAY, MARCH 21, 2026

You know it when you see it: "Presidential timber" is hard to find. You know it when see you see it. 

There are one hundred United States senators. Within the political realm, they're all extremely high achievers. 

Very few of them are real presidential timber. We don't mean that as a criticism.

Last night, we were surprised to see that elusive quality right there on our TV screen. We saw it in someone who's only 34 years old. 

By law, he can't ever run for president. We were surprised to see it, but there it was, unmistakably, right there on the screen.

Amna Nawaz conducted the interview for the PBS NewsHour. The first exchange went like this

NAWAZ (3/20/26): Mr. Mayor, welcome to the News Hour. Thanks for making the time. 

MAYOR MAMDANI: Absolutely. Thank you so much for being here.  

NAWAZ: So let's talk a little bit about your first few months in office. You really had to hit the ground running. You had a lot coming at you too. You had a major nurses strike to handle, a record-breaking snowstorm.

I know you have probably heard the difference between campaigning in poetry, governing in prose. Does that bring true to you? Have you found that to be true?  

MAYOR MAMDANI: I think there's still a little poetry in the day-to-day. I think it's important that we don't let our imagination become constrained by what we are inheriting.

Mamdani's term as mayor on New York could always turn out badly. Also, because he was born in Uganda, he can't ever run for the White House.

That said, you know it when you see it! The smile, the poetry, the look to the future? We were surprised to see that all the key timber was there.

Elsewhere, possibly not so much! Tens of millions of fellow citizens will disagree, but this is the way Chris Hayes began Thursday night's All In program:

HAYES (3/19/26): Good evening from New York. I'm Chris Hayes. 

You know, every once in a while, you just have to remind yourself that the president of the United States is a sociopathor at the very least, being charitable here, he just can't help himself from acting like one.

And that's particularly relevant right now as the man is directing the military might of this nation in yet another war in the Middle East, and that is not going well.  

Is the current sitting president a "likely sociopath?" Hayes floated that notion at least six times as his monologue continued. 

As we've noted, "sociopath" isn't a clinical term. Beyond that, we'd prefer to see this question discussed by (carefully chosen) medical specialistsand we'd rather see any such affliction portrayed as a deeply unfortunate (though dangerous) illness, not as a source of insult or denigration.  

That said, that's where Hayes began on Thursday night. Real Clear Politics transcribed the first several minutes of what he said. You can see fuller videotape at the All In site.

Beyond all that, we're forced to report that Greg Gutfeld, 61 years old, fell off the wagon again last night. For whatever reason, there he went again, opening his program on the Fox News Channel with a "joke" in which he compared Joy Behar to "a hippo." 

Soon thereafter, things got substantially worse. We remain amazed but instructed by the fact that no major journalist in the Blue American firmament thinks this endless cultural swill is worth reporting or discussing. 

Our big Blue stars let this garbage. Our Blue stars, and our Blue orgs, just plainly don't seem to care

Now for the latest postponement! We're going to wait until next week to show you what Gutfeld and Emily Compagno said about James Talarico on Tuesday's edition of The Five

Can Talarico win the Texas Senate seat? We have no idea! But it should have been shocking to see him instantly compared, on the grisly Fox News Channel, to Ted Bundy and David Koresh. 

It should have been shockingbut by now it almost wasn't. 

"At long last," do the people who run that imitation news channel "have left no sense of decency?" And how about the finer people who agree to avert their gaze from this swill?

We'll turn to one quick Q-and-A from last evening's NewsHour. As a bit of background, Amna Nawaz was born and raised in the state of Virginia, the daughter of South Asian immigrants:

NAWAZ: I have to ask you about your family before I let you go, because I think anyone familiar with the specific and what I would say very fortunate experience of being raised by Desi parents, South Asian parents, especially those with the courage and the hope to forge an entirely new life in new nations, you know that you can learn a lot from them.

MAYOR MAMDANI: Yes.

So the mayor said. We thought of that favorite passage from My Antoniathe passage in which Willa Cather's gender-switched narrator is discussing the Nebraska "immigrant girls" for whom Cather, in real life, had a lifelong high regard:

My Antonia: Book II, Section IX

There was a curious social situation in Black Hawk. All the young men felt the attraction of the fine, well-set-up country girls who had come to town to earn a living, and, in nearly every case, to help the father struggle out of debt, or to make it possible for the younger children of the family to go to school.

Those girls had grown up in the first bitter-hard times, and had got little schooling themselves. But the younger brothers and sisters, for whom they made such sacrifices and who have had ‘advantages,’ never seem to me, when I meet them now, half as interesting or as well educated. The older girls, who helped to break up the wild sod, learned so much from life, from poverty, from their mothers and grandmothers; they had all, like Ántonia, been early awakened and made observant by coming at a tender age from an old country to a new.

They had learned so much from poverty! Has a more beautifully crafted statement ever been placed in print?

And yes, we'll admit it again. Yesterday, we took Francine Prose's book to the medical mission, where there's a lot of sitting around. 

We hadn't reread it in several years. We could spend weeks writing about every page in the parts of the book where Prose discusses who the real Anne Frank actually was:

("A demanding and often sickly baby, Anne grew into a challenging child—mercurial, moody, humorous, alternately outgoing and shy." Also, though, a much-loved, precocious child who was a gifted, determined young writer.)

Also, the parts of the book in which in which Prose discusses the remarkably complex way Anne Frank's famous book actually came to be written. 

Also, the part of the book in which Prose describes the serendipity thanks to which the famous writing in question wasn't carried away and discarded by the people who arrested Anne Frank, along with her parents and her older sister, Margot Frank. (Only her father survived.)

Postponing the torture of transcribing the latest statements of the Fox News Channel Two, we'll leave you today with Prose's description of the one tiny bit of film which remainsa piece of film which can be seen, even today, right there for the whole world to see on YouTube:

A FLICKER of a home movie. June 22, 1941. The whole thing lasts ten seconds.

The bicycles slipping by provide the only indication that we are in Holland. The brick Merwedeplein apartment block looks more like married students’ housing on an American state university campus than the quaint center-city canal houses we associate with Amsterdam.

The camera waits outside a door, peering up a stairwell. In search of something to focus on, it pans up the side of a building. In the open windows are neighborhood residents, girls and young women, their elbows propped on the sills, waiting. The women at the windows alter the look of the street, so the scene begins to look more like a village in southern Europe.

The newlywed couple appears, arm in arm, the groom in a top hat, cane, and formal wear, the bride in a flattering pale suit, a jaunty white fedora, and gloves; she carries a bouquet. They walk down the stairs and pause like movie stars obliging the paparazzi. Passersby lean against their bicycles, staring.

Suddenly, the camera zooms toward the sky and finds Anne Frank, watching from her window. She turns and speaks to someone inside the apartment. She looks back at the couple, then away. The camera appears to lose interest. It glances at a few more spectators, then returns to the Amsterdam street.

On the Web site for the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum, you can watch those few seconds of Anne on film, in blurred and grainy close-up. Anne’s body language is quick, electric. A breeze, or maybe the motion of her body, lifts her hair as she turns, and her eyes smudge into dark ovals as she gazes down at the bridal couple.

As familiar as we are with images of Anne Frank, as inured as we may think we are to the sight of her beautiful face, the film pierces whatever armor we imagine we have developed. It is always shockingly short and always the same, and yet you are never entirely sure what you have, or haven’t, seen. It’s less like watching a film clip than like having one of those dreams in which you see a long-lost loved one or friend. In the dream, the person isn’t really dead. You must have been mistaken. You wake up, and it takes a few moments to understand why the dream was so cruelly deceptive.

We're with Prose every word of the way. We regard that as sacred film, sacred film of a sacred being.

Anne Frank is so viewed in certain cultures around the world. But what could possibly make us think that she was, or that she is, some sort of "sacred being?"

We'll admit that you're asking a very good question. You know it when you see it, we'll thoughtfully say. Though we don't see it much around here!

For today, we chose to stay with Prose and Anne Frank. Ted Bundy, David Koresh?  

Fellow citizens, thank you for asking! We'll present that disaster next week, Blue American silence included.


FRIDAY: Anne Frank, plus two others!

FRIDAY, MARCH 20, 2026

What Yevtushenko said: When we drop in at the medical mission, we treat it as a reading experience. (There tends to be a lot of sitting around.)

Today, we turned to the book we couldn't find a few weeks ago, and we pondered a present-day problem. We're forced to admit a semi-embarrassing fact:

By our reckoning, that book still strikes us as possibly the most interesting book we've ever read. 

Your reaction won't likely be the same. Be that as it may, the volume in question is this:

Anne Frank:
The Book, the Life, the Afterlife

By Francine Prose
HarperCollins Publishers, 2009

We know, we knowwe're wearing you out! That said, Prose began her text with this quotation from John Berryman, who was no one's idea of a dummy:

I would call the subject of Anne Frank’s Diary even more mysterious and fundamental than St. Augustine’s, and describe it as the conversion of a child into a person….

That brief clip comes from Berryman's 1967 essay, The Development of Anne Frank. 

This morning, when we read that opening line, we thought of two present day persons. We thought of the people who, just this past week, sat on our nation's most-watched "cable news" program and proceeded to compare James Talarico, first to a well-known deranged mass murderer, then to the apparently deluded leader of a religious cult.

(The first person said that Talarico gives him "Ted Bundy vibes." The second person called Talarico "a terrifying child," then compared him to David Koresh.)

What makes someone a person? Tomorrow, we'll offer transcripts of the fuller remarks by those two present-day people.

Prose's book still sweeps us away. So does the silence of Blue America's AWOL elitesthe silence we've often mentioned.

As Prose begins to write in her own voice, she offers this:

The first time I read The Diary of Anne Frank I was younger than its author was when, at the age of thirteen, she began to write it... 

In the summer of 2005, I read the diary once more. I had just begun making notes for a novel that, I knew, would be narrated in the voice of a thirteen-year-old girl. Having written a book suggesting that writers seek guidance from a close and thoughtful reading of the classics, I thought I should follow my own advice, and it occurred to me that the greatest book ever written about a thirteen-year-old girl was Anne Frank's diary.

Prose moves on (and on) from there, with the astounding back-story of a very well-known unknown book and its precocious young author, who was actually fifteen when her project was stopped.

What does that have to do with those other two people? We won't try to answer that question.

Tomorrow, we'll record what those two people actually said. Along the way, we urge you to remember this:

No people are uninteresting.

So Yevtushenko said.


BREAKING: Cleaning out the pasture spring!

FRIDAY, MARCH 20, 2026

Bundy, Koresh to follow: As it happens, we're going out to clean the pasture spring, or something very much like it

We may offer a post in mid-afternoon. But it's back to the slag heap tomorrow!

Tomorrow: "Ted Bundy vibes," one messenger said. "David Koresh," said another!


THURSDAY: The fact that this conduct takes place is news!

THURSDAY, MARCH 19, 2026

It should be reported as such: Here at the heart of this sprawling campus, we'd like to see Jessica Grose sign up with her local cable provider. 

After that, we'd like to see her start watching the Fox News Channel. We derive this desire from her latest column for the New York Times. 

Headline included, the column starts like this:

The Manosphere Continues to Devolve

In the new documentary “Inside the Manosphere,” the English filmmaker and host Louis Theroux describes the buff, screen-addled U.S. and British influencers he interviews as creators of “the new world of men who are redefining what it means to be a man.” But I came away from the movie, now on Netflix, thinking that it eclipsed this framing.

Young men may finally be waking up to the utter emptiness of the manosphere’s messaging.

So begins Grose's new columnor is it really a "subscriber-only newsletter?" Until today, we had never tried to puzzle it out, and the arcana of that other sprawling enterprise can sometimes be overwhelming.

That said, Grose has been at her desk "for Opinion" since 2021, and her latest offering is about the manosphere. As to what that sprawling entity is, she is soon offering this:

[continuing directly
The manosphere—a loose collection of male podcasters and social media stars who push misogynistic and ultraconservative views—is not new. The term is at least 15 years old and rose to a frequent topic of mainstream discourse during Donald Trump’s first presidential term.

The men Theroux interviews are pushing some of the oldest grifts and ancient hatreds in the book, even if they’ve been using new technology to beam those views out to a global audience. The creators Theroux follows—young men with handles like HSTikkyTokky and Sneako—share very familiar ideas of what it means to be a man, ones that predated the rise of social media: making money, having big muscles, driving expensive cars and sleeping with as many women as possible. Though Theroux does not talk to Andrew or Tristan Tate, the most prominent modern manosphere influencers, clips of the Tate brothers appear throughout the film. 

Superficially, these men are selling their audiences bizarre and extremist ideas—women shouldn’t vote; covering one eye in a photograph is a reference to a satanic plot—against the backdrop of the babes and Lamborghinis they “possess.” There’s a whole section of the documentary in which it seems every conversation Theroux has devolves into an antisemitic conspiracy theory involving the Rothschilds, citing “the Jews” who control the one world government or the media or Theroux himself. These specific conspiracy theories have been appearing in pamphlets—the old-timey version of viral videos—since the 19th century.

It’s unclear if any of the men actually believe what they say, or if they’re just shouting the most outrageous nonsense possible in order to maintain the attention of their audiences and get a rise out of Theroux and other spectators. They are quite self-aware about their place in the attention economy. “If I’d just done good things, I would never have really blown up on social media in the first place,” one of the men tells Theroux.

Sic semper the so-called manosphere. Grose goes on to suggest that the influence of this unfortunate movement is lessening. Recalling President Kennedy in Berlin, we'll only say this about that:

Let her come to the world of cable TV and watch the Fox News Channel!

In short, we're begging Grose to extend her range beyond the realm of "male podcasters and social media stars." We're asking her to acquire rights to the "new technology" now dominated by the Fox News Channel. 

If it's grifts she wants to cover, we're hoping she'll fire up the cable and watch several of that outfit's most-watched "cable news" showsand that she'll then report the gruesome behavior she sees.

We've been waiting for Godot to do thatrather, we've been waiting for Kristof and Brooks and Stephens and Cottle and for someone, anyone, who's typing for The Atlantic.

(Helen Lewis, across the pond, please come on over and down!)

Mutts like them will never do it! Perhaps a relative newcomer will.

If Grose accepts this cable news challenge, she'll be arriving on the scene a bit late. Pete Hegseth is gone from Fox & Friends Weekend, where he co-hosted with Rachel and Will right through the last election. 

He's now at the Pentagon, where he has, among other things, commissioned "a controversial pastor who supports repealing women’s right to vote" (see above!) to lead a worship service.

In our view, people are free to believe what they believe, even including what they believe about gender relations. Borrowing from Lincoln, "it may seem strange" to think that women should be denied the right to vote, "but let us judge not, that we be not judged."

(Full disclosure: Lincoln himself may have been a bit late to the game regarding the suffrage question.)

At any rate, even if Hegseth is gone from Fox, more virulent purveyors remain. Having abandoned our faith in Godot, we turn our eyes toward Grose.

At this point, we're going to try to restrict ourselves to purely descriptive language:

Each night, they pry the lid off the can at Fox and the swill comes slithering out. The Blue old liners at the Times refuse to report and discuss this remarkable fact. We're hoping a relative newcomer willbut also, with luck, Michelle Goldberg!

Whatever you think of the conduct in question, the fact that this conduct takes place is news! It should be reported, discussed.


BATTLES: The battles are fought by people like these!

THURSDAY, MARCH 19, 2026

Gutfeld's medical specialists: James Talarico is 36. If anything, he may look somewhat younger.  

Adjusting for age, he strikes us as an obvious high achiever. Yesterday, we turned to the leading authority on his career for this assortment of basics

James Talarico

James Dell Talarico (born May 17, 1989) is an American politician, Presbyterian seminarian, and former educator who has served since 2018 as a member of the Texas House of Representatives. Talarico is the Democratic nominee for the 2026 U.S. Senate election in Texas...

Talarico graduated from the University of Texas at Austin with a Bachelor of Arts in government. He later joined Teach For America, where he taught sixth-grade English language arts in San Antonio. Afterward, he served as the Central Texas executive director for Reasoning Mind, a nonprofit focused on bringing technology to low-income classrooms. He later graduated from Harvard University with a Master of Education degree in education policy.

Talarico serves as vice chair of two bodies in the Texas House: the Trade, Workforce, and Economic Development Committee and the Subcommittee on Academic and Career-Oriented Education under the Public Education Committee. He also serves on the Public Education Committee and the House Administration Committee. 

[...]

Talarico's maternal grandfather was a Baptist preacher in South Texas who Talarico says taught him that Christianity "is a simple—though not easy—religion, rooted in two commandments: 'Love God and love your neighbor.' " 

At age 36, Talarico "is the Democratic nominee for the 2026 U.S. Senate election in Texas!" Like President Clinton before himThey rarely voted for me, but you'll never meet a finer bunch of people than the Arkansas Pentecostalshe knows how to talk about Christianity, as a Democrat, to a southern red state audience. 

At age 36, he's the Democratic nominee for the Texas Senate seat! We'll take it as obvious that certain Red American elites are afraid he could possibly win. 

We don't know if Talarico really can possibly win. That said, we'll take it as obvious that such fears explain what happened on Tuesday's edition of The Five, where the candidate was compared first to a deranged mass murderer / sexual pervert, then to the lunatic leader(s) of one or two lunatic cults. 

Those astounding comparisons were given voice by a pair of people we regard as rather strangeby Greg Gutfeld, age 61, but also by Emily Compagno, age 46. 

In the main, we're inclined to regard Gutfeld and Compagno as corporate messenger children for the profit-seeking Fox News Channel. Setting that impression aside, we'll offer this assessment with a high degree of confidence: 

Judged by any traditional standard, Gutfeld and Compagno belong on this nation's most-watched "cable news" program in much the way we should be hired as artistic director for Moscow's Bolshoi Ballet. 

We don't think they belong in their posts; others find their behaviors refreshing. Today, let's offer two quick examples of what those behaviors tend to be. 

Quickly, we'll start with the Christianity. Concerning the southern border, Talarico said this in a Democratic debate back at the start of the year: 

So, my family is from the border. My mom grew up in Laredo, Texas. I feel like Texans understand this issue of immigration more so than people in other states, because we live with it, both the benefits and the challenges. 

So, what I have said is that our southern border should be like our front porch. There should be a giant welcome mat out front and a lock on the door.

We can welcome immigrants who want to live the American dream, we can build a pathway to citizenship for those neighbors who have been here making us richer and stronger, and we can keep out people who mean to do us harm.

So said Talaricounless you watch the Fox News Channel, in which case he said something quite different:

On March 3, Talarico won the Democratic Party's nomination for the Texas Senate seat. Two days later, right there on The Five, Dana Perino, age 53, introduced a doctored bit of videotape in which Talarico was shown saying this:

Our southern border should be like our front porch. There should be a giant welcome mat out front.

Full stop! The Fox News Channel had disappeared the part of his statement about having a lock on the door!

In fairness to Perino, she probably didn't know that her corporate owners had created a doctored bit of tape. Also, the pay can be extremely good at the "news channel" where Perino is cast, on this nation's top-rated show, as the co-host who isn't nuts.

(For a fuller account of the doctoring of Talarico's statement, see this fact check by AFPby Agence France-Presse. Needless to say, Elon Musk, age 54, is part of this pathetic story. Somewhat instructively, we had to travel across the pond to find a formal fact-check of this pathetic misconduct.)

We'll assume that Perino didn't know that Talarico's statement had been doctored. We'll assume that Gutfeld and Compagno are unaware of this matter too.

There's no real assumption, on a show like The Five, that the four pro-MAGA co-hosts have any idea what they're talking about. With that, we move on to this:

With apologies, we're going to cite some conduct we regard as ugly and destructive, but also as deeply stupid. With apologies, we're going to take you on a brief trip inside Gutfeld's mind.

We'll start with Monday night's (primetime) Gutfeld! program. As always, the gentleman started with a few minutes of "jokes."

Most simply put, the fellow simply can't seem to quit a certain type of loathing. With apologies:

At 10:03, his final "joke" went exactly like this:

GUTFELD (3/16/26): And finally, the Best Picture [Oscar] went to One Battle After Another.

And no, that's not the name of the documentary about Rosie and her gynecologist.

In such ways, this undisguised nutcase conducts his own disordered battles everywhere all at once. Last night, at 10:03, he shoved his grimy little nose where it doesn't belong once again:

GUTFELD (3/18/26): And finally, comedian Chelsea Handler says that the house that she bought from RFK Jr. was deemed "toxic and unlivable." 

Which are the same words used by her gynecologist.

The man is 61 years old! Except for its effect on the world, we regard this as sad and pathetic. 

Simply put, he just can't seem to quit this general practice! On Tuesday night, no gynecologists were mentioned. But in his first three minutes of jokes, he compared Michelle Obama to a horse; he complained about Rosie O'Donnell's unbelievably hairy back; and he told us what President Macron thinks about his wife's penis.

We've advised you to pity the child. Let's return to our starting place:

On Tuesday's edition of The Five, this same person said he gets "Ted Bundy vibes" from the vastly more accomplished Talarico. Moments later, Compagno described Talarico as "a terrifying child" who makes her think of David Koreshand, apparently, of this second cult leader.

Over the next few days, we're going to post fuller transcripts of what these two people said about Talarico. We think a record should be created for future generations, assuming such people are going to exist.

That said:

All around the ramparts of Blue America, the strange behavior of people like Gutfeld and Compagno is met by complete, total silence. We leave you today with a question:

Whose behavior is stranger, uglier, less excusable? The behavior of the peculiar people who play the game the Fox News Channel way? Or the behavior of the self-impressed Blue elites who insist on averting their gaze?

("Thank you, silence," Alanis Morissette said. We don't think she meant this.)

Tomorrow or Saturday: What Gutfeld and Compagno said, not that anyone cares

Additional bonus language: Within the context of the song and the larger body of early work, we regard this as profound implied advice:

Thank you, India
Thank you, terror
Thank you, disillusionment
Thank you, frailty
Thank you, consequence
Thank you, thank you, silence

"You learn," this youthful seer also said. People, where in the world did that very bright person ever get that idea?