SONG(S) SUNG BLUE: O'Donnell wins the Pulitzer Prize!

WEDNESDAY, FEBRUARY 4, 2026

Also, the president's Waterloo: Last evening, starting at 10 o'clock, Lawrence O'Donnel spent an hour winning the Pulitzer Prize.

We refer to the Pulitzer Prize for Not Being Asleep at The Wheel While Being Powder Blue. Before we describe O'Donnell's performance, let's return to one of the columns which appeared, over the weekend, at the New York Times.

As we noted in Monday's report, we thought we heard a familiar song as we read a few of those columns. In one column, Jamelle Bouie seemed to be dreaming a pleasant dream about a certain president's recent drop in the polls.

"Minneapolis May Be Trump’s Gettysburg," the headline on the column said. The president's current decline may be his Gettysburgperhaps even his Waterloo!

We thought we heard a familiar old song sung Blue. We thought we possibly heard that same song in the new column by Ezra Klein.

"Trump Has Overwhelmed Himself," the headline said on that column

At this site, we recalled the way Candidate Trump had supposedly doomed himself with what he said about John McCain! Also, we recalled the way he had doomed himself with what he said to Billy Bush on that Access Hollywood videotape!

We Blues! We've been singing that song of easy escape since at least 2015. As we read those two columnseven as we read this guest essay by Ruth Ben-Ghiatwe thought we might be hearing the newest version of that same old tribal song.

(At one point, we even flashed on On The Beach, the four major stars 1959 film about the last few months of human life after a nuclear war. That's the danger we apparently saw in the revival of that pleasing old song.)

Will reaction to the fatal shooting of Michael Pretti prove to be the downfall of the sitting president? Everything is possible! 

Without question, that decline could point the way to victory by Democrats in this year's congressional elections. But what happens after that?

Before we consider O'Donnell's performance, let's turn to several striking comments in the three columns we've mentioned. We'll start with the column by Bouie, in which he offers this portrait of MAGA defeat:

Minneapolis May Be Trump’s Gettysburg

[...]

The result was a catastrophic defeat for the Confederacy. Lee lost the initiative and would spend the rest of the war fighting on the defensive, unable to wage another strategic campaign. The Confederacy would not win foreign recognition, leaving it helpless against a Union blockade. And even with the tremendous loss of life—the Union Army suffered more than 23,000 casualties over three days of battle—the Northern public would be reinvigorated by victory, ready to continue the fight.

ICE and C.B.P. still roam the streets, and Trump’s authoritarian aspirations have not dimmed. But surveying the wreckage of Operation Metro Surge—of this reactionary administration’s crushing defeat at the hands of another band of tenacious Northerners—it does look to me like MAGA’s Gettysburg.

Everything is possible (at least until it isn't)! That said, that sounds a bit like wishful thinking. We almost thought we heard the lilt of a very old tribal song.

Full disclosure!  Assuming our scheduled elections take place this fall, MAGA may well get crushedbut President Trump will remain in the Oval Office! And in her balanced, academic presentation, Professor Ben-Ghiat makes a significant claim:

History Shows Trump’s Worst Impulses May Backfire on Him

[...]

“I follow my instincts, and I am never wrong,” said the Italian Fascist dictator Mussolini, shortly before he invaded Ethiopia in 1935. That war and Italy’s ensuing occupation initially made him popular at home, further inflating his ego, but eventually contributed to the bankruptcy of the Italian state.

[...]

It is well documented that strongmen are at their most dangerous when they feel threatened. That is why, as popular discontent with the Trump administration’s actions deepens, Americans should brace for heightened militarized domestic repression and more imperialist aggression abroad.

"I am never wrong," Mussolini said. President Trump makes similar statements pretty much every day of the week.

Could a type of (clinically diagnosable) delusion be present when he makes such grandiose claims? We can't answer that question, but Ben-Ghiat makes a claim which we ourselves have suggested in the past:

Strongmen are at their most dangerous when they feel threatened!

If MAGA does get mauled this November, how might the sitting president react? It would be a peculiar type of Gettysburg which led our struggling nation to "heightened militarized domestic repression and more imperialist aggression abroad."

It seemed to uswe could be wrong!that Bouie wasn't recognizing the full sweep of the possibilities at this dangerous time. Meanwhile, Ezra Klein, like Bouie, is very smartbut we thought the highlighted assertion was flatly, baldly inaccurate:

Trump Has Overwhelmed Himself

[...]

This is a presidency that is, by any measure, failing. Trump is unpopular; his brutality and his tariffs have turned immigration and affordability, once among of his strongest issues, into liabilities. Trump’s opposition is increasingly united and mobilized; Democrats are besting Republicans in elections all across the country and disciplined, brave, beautiful protest movements have emerged in the cities ICE has sought to occupy.

From what planet does that assertion hail? By the apparent "measure" of the sitting president, his presidency isn't failing at all On the planet where he seems to live, his presidency continues to be a miraculous success. 

(Clinical) delusion being what it is, we ourselves don't doubt the possibility that the sitting president truly believes his claims about his astounding success. For example, we don't doubt the possibility that he really does believe that he won the 2020 election! 

Does he really believe such things? On this campus, we have no idea, in part because Klein and Bouie have joined the rest of the guild in agreeing that medical specialists must never be asked to share what they know about the workings of (diagnosable) "delusional disorder."

We Blues! When we sing our tribal songs, echoing Achilles of old, we agree that such possibilities must not impinge on our tribal pleasure. We'll suggest that you ponder this:

As you may know, "Song Sung Blue" was and is one of Neil Diamond's most popular songs. To see him perform it, click here.

(We remember our conversation, long ago, with our friend, the comedian [NAME WITHHELD], in which we savants agreedDiamond could sing any page in the phone book and make it sound profound. It's an amazing performance skilla skill of high persuasion.)

In his popular "Song Sung Blue," Diamond was talking about a different kind of blue song. But in his lyrics, one key phrase almost seems to ring a bell in the present day:

Song Sung Blue

[...]

Funny thing, but you can sing it with a cry in your voice
And before you know it you get to feeling good
You simply got no choice...

Before you know it, you get to feeling good! Seeking such a type of deliverance is a well-known human tendency. 

We still haven't mentioned the way O'Donnell won the Pulitzer Prize last night. Also, we haven't had time to comment on the pathetic omissions which can be ascribed to this morning's report in the New York Times:

Also, we haven't mentioned that other column from the New York Times, the column by David French. That column also appeared this weekend. Yesterday, it appeared in print editions of the Times.

Blue Americans won't get to "feelin' good" in the course of French's column. French says the signs are abundantly clearthe sitting president isn't planning to permit a normal set of congressional elections to take place this year.

French could always be wrong, of coursebut he could also be right. We recently read this nostrum somewhere:

Strongmen are at their most dangerous when they feel threatened.

Attention, Blues! Our journalistic elites have failed us every step of the way. That dates all the way back to the invention of the Whitewater pseudo-scandal (now long forgotten), followed by the twenty-month war against Candidate Gore.

That said, what happens in the mainstream press corps' guild stays inside the guildand every guild member knows he or she must abide by that rule. 

We thought we heard a song sung Blue. Is there any possible chance that we're being ill-served again?

Tomorrow: What Lawrence O'Donnell (and only O'Donnell) correctly and angrily did

This afternoon: Gutfeld, off the wagon

In our view, a brilliant self-portrait: We never were Neil Diamond fans. But has anyone ever defined himself more brilliantly, or more concisely, than he did right here?

I Am, I Said

[...]

Did you ever read about the frog
Who dreamed of being a king
And then became one?
Well except for the names
And a few other changes,
If you talk about me,
The story's the same one...

Wow! Translation, within the context of the song:

Today, I'm a giant star in L.A.but that's not who I actually am! 


POSTPONEMENT: Subway succumbs to eight inches of snow!

TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 3, 2026

Also, goodbye Kennedy Center: True story! 

Last Friday, we never made it to the medical mission. Making a long and frigid story short, we were wrong when we assumed that it doesn't snow in the subway. 

Once they determined that no trains would be running, further chaos ensued.

As a result, we're to the mission today on a makeup assignment. We won't be posting today, not even about this essay in the Washington Post:

The grave risk of Trump’s Kennedy Center shutdown

Last fall, workers at the Kennedy Center slapped a coat of white paint over the gold-hued columns that connect its upper terrace to its plaza, apparently at the direction of the man who effectively appointed himself chair of the center’s board, President Donald Trump.

It was a seemingly small intervention from a man who fancies himself a connoisseur of architecture, but of course, it made no architectural or visual sense. Now, the all-white columns disappear against the building’s white marble cladding, and so too the lovely symbolism of the narrow, modernist metal supports, which look more like the strings of a musical instrument than the traditional, heavy stone supports of a classical structure.

Now there is grave concern from artists and patrons that the institution itself may disappear. Sunday night, Trump announced a two-year closure for renovation beginning in July, which sounds ominously like a complete rebuild of the structure. Trump added Monday that he wasn’t “ripping it down” but then went on to describe a process that could tear the structure down to its steel framing.

Given Trump’s sudden demolition of the White House’s East Wing in October, and the mix of vague promises and bombastic language in his social media post, which promises “a new and spectacular Entertainment Complex,” it certainly seems possible that the 1971 building, designed architect Edward Durrell Stone, could be partially or completely erased...

And so on from there.

The column was written by Philip Kennicott, the paper's long-time art and architecture critic. A letter expressing a similar concern"Watch for another wrecking ball"has been published by the New York Times. The letter comes from a former chief editor of Architecture Magazine.

Is it possible that these fears are well-founded? We don't have the slightest idea. We can tell you this:

These peculiar events will keep occurring until we're prepared to discuss what seems to be sitting there right before us. Of course, these peculiar events would almost surely continue to happen even if we did decide to have that discussion.

This is the silence we've chosen. All in all, it seems like the best we can do.


MONDAY: Morning Joe played the videotape!

MONDAY, FEBRUARY 2, 2026

Almost surely, Fox & Friends Weekend won't: It's true! Joe Scarborough did start today's Morning Joe with what could be called "screams of rage."

He was playing the remarkable videotape of the latest bizarre behavior by ICE. As part of this reportMediate reports the bulk of what he said and provides the Morning Joe tape:

Joe Scarborough Screams in Rage Watching ‘Idiot’ ICE ‘Thugs’ Chase, Pull Guns on Woman

Morning Joe host Joe Scarborough screamed at the camera, trashing ICE as an “undisciplined paramilitary force” as he watched back shocking footage of the moment federal agents chased and surrounded an unarmed Minneapolis woman in her vehicle with their weapons drawn.

The woman is seen in the video from St. Peter, Minnesota, calling police as she’s being pursued by the agents on January 29 after reportedly observing and recording their actions.

As the woman requests help from police and gives her location, the agents’ red vehicle cuts her off, and officers step out to demand she exit her car.

And so on, at length, from there, with no lack of furious behavior involving threats from very large guns. The fuller story of this remarkable incident is provided by Minnesota Public Radio if you simply click here.

St. Peter police chief intervened and got federal agents to release resident, sources say

MPR News has learned that the police chief in the small southern Minnesota city of St. Peter intervened Thursday to prevent federal immigration agents from taking a local resident into detention, although the city of St. Peter denied the intervention in a statement Saturday.

And so on from there. We offer one additional thought:

That seems to be the kind of behavior many Minneapolis residents have witnessed in recent weeks. Can we tell you who won't be witnessing this latest bit of videotape? 

Almost surely, viewers of Fox & Friends Weekend will never see that tape. Neither will viewers of other programs on the Fox News Channel.

Why are people protesting in Minneapolis? As we noted in Saturday's report, Hurt, Campos-Duffy and Jenkins answered that question for Red American viewers on that day's Fox & Friends Weekend. The people were out there protesting in frigid temperatures because they're paid, viewers were told, and because they're "a little bit crazy."

That is the embarrassing way those three friends behave on the air. On Sunday morning, they continued along with that Song Sung Red, but we leave you with an obvious question:

Were some people in Minneapolis protesting last week because they've seen federal agents behaving in similar ways? Or because they've heard about such bizarre behavior? Or because they've seen the videotape?

We'll guess that the answer is yes! That said, viewers of Fox & Friends Weekend aren't likely to see that videotape. That very much isn't a "song sung Red." On programs like Fox & Friends Weekend, the songs involve different events.

Newspapers like the New York Times should be reporting the way our two Americas, Red and Blue, are exposed to different information and to different ideasand to different pieces of videotape. This is a very basic part of our failing modern politics.

It's a basic part of our crumbling society's ongoing societal meltdown. For reasons only they can explain, most news orgs don't want to go there.


SONG(S) SUNG BLUE: Are we hearing the latest "song sung Blue?"

MONDAY, FEBRUARY 2, 2026

We may not agree with its message: With the release of additional Epstein files, the stumblebum conduct continued. 

That said, was this really stumblebum conduct? Or might it have been a gesture of contempt from within an undeclared "silent secession?" Let's hear from the Wall Street Journal:

Epstein Files Release Exposes Names of at Least 43 Victims, WSJ Review Finds

The Justice Department exposed the names of dozens of Jeffrey Epstein’s victims, including many who haven’t shared their identities publicly or were minors when they were abused by the notorious sex offender.

A review of 47 victims’ full names on Sunday found that 43 of them were left unredacted in files that were made public by the government on Friday, according to a Wall Street Journal analysis. Several women’s full names appeared more than 100 times in the files.

Could they really have been that inept? Or was that just the latest gesture?

Whatever the answer to that question might be, the madness has continued unabated. With respect to Rep. Omar, the president quickly returned to the practice of calling forwell, we'll let Mediaite explain:

Trump Rages At Ilhan Omar In Early Morning Rant Days After Attack—Demands Sending Her To Jail Or ‘Back’ To Africa

President Donald Trump attacked Rep. Ilhan Omar (D-MN) in an early morning rant suggesting she be jailed or “sent back” to Africa just days after she was attacked onstage.

And so on from there. In a somewhat similar gesture, he announced, early this morning, that he may sue celebrity host Trevor Noah because of the bad thing he said:

Trump Aims Next Lawsuit at Trevor Noah Over ‘Defamatory’ Epstein Joke at Grammys: ‘Get Ready Noah, I’m Going To Have Some Fun With You!’

President Donald Trump said he is going to sue “pathetic” Trevor Noah after he made a “false and defamatory” joke about the president hanging out with dead sex criminal Jeffrey Epstein while hosting the Grammy Awards on Sunday night.

Trump went off on Noah in a Truth Social post at 1:01 a.m. on Monday.

And so on from there. 

More accurately, the president only said that he may decide to sue Noah. For the record, he returned to his "George Slopadopolus" construct in the course of this post:

Ask Little George Slopadopolus, and others, how that all worked out. Also ask CBS! Get ready Noah, I’m going to have some fun with you!

It was actually Little George Slopadopolus to whom his post referred.

Have recent events in Minneapolis damaged the president's political standing? It seems that they actually have! But after replacing Bovino with Homan, the president continued along on his rather unusual way.

Consider this surprising announcement, to cite one example:

Trump Drops Big News About His ‘Trump Kennedy Center’—It’s Closing For 2 Years

In a lengthy Truth Social post Sunday, President Donald Trump announced that his renovation plans for the Kennedy Center For The Performing Arts will involve closing the facility for a full two years.

And so on from there. Will "Kennedy" still be part of the name by the time the renovations are done? 

Regarding those naming rights, we wouldn't bet one way or the other. Meanwhile, also this construction project, according to this report in Saturday's Washington Post:

Trump wants to build a 250-foot-tall arch, dwarfing the Lincoln Memorial

The White House stands about 70 feet tall. The Lincoln Memorial, roughly 100 feet. The triumphal arch President Donald Trump wants to build would eclipse both if he gets his wish.

Trump has grown attached to the idea of a 250-foot-tall structure overlooking the Potomac River, according to two people who spoke on the condition of anonymity to describe his comments, a scale that has alarmed some architectural experts who initially supported the idea of an arch but expected a far smaller one.

[...]

Trump has considered smaller versions of the arch, including 165-foot-high and 123-foot-high designs he shared at a dinner last year. But he has favored the largest option, arguing that its sheer size would impress visitors to Washington, and that “250 for 250” makes the most sense, the people said.

Of course! You always design the height of a project based on how many years it has been!

The president tore down the East Wing in order to build a ballroom; the ballroom just keeps getting bigger. So too, it seems, with the triumphal arch. 

And yet, the most remarkable post-Minneapolis walk-back moment would almost surely be this:

FBI Raids Georgia Election Office in Probe Related to 2020 Voter Fraud

The FBI has raided a Georgia election hub as part of an investigation into 2020 election fraud, Fox News Digital reported on Wednesday.

Agents were seen entering the Fulton County Election Hub and Operation Center just outside of Atlanta on Wednesday in an operation related to the 2020 election, the outlet reported. A law enforcement official later confirmed to Reuters that a search warrant was executed at the facility.

President Donald Trump has claimed repeatedly—and without evidence—that the 2020 election, which he lost to Joe Biden, was stolen and rigged against him.

More than five years later, this madness hasn't stopped! Tulsi Gabbard was on the sceneand also, there was this:

Trump Revives #Italygate—The Weirdest 2020 Election Conspiracy of Them All

In the middle of a late-night online posting spree on Wednesday, President Donald Trump resurrected what may be the most bizarre conspiracy theory to emerge from the aftermath of the 2020 election: the idea that the vote was stolen in a globe-spanning covert operation involving Italian military satellites, U.S. intelligence agencies, and China.

Between posts declaring former President Barack Obama a “traitor” and inaccurate claims Walmart is shutting down in California, the president reshared a screengrab of an X post to his 11.6 million followers on Truth Social alleging that “Italian officials at [defense contractor] Leonardo SpA used military satellites to help hack U.S. voting machines, flipping votes from Trump to Biden using CIA-developed tools like Hammer and Scorecard.”

“China reportedly coordinated the whole operation,” the post claimed, while “the CIA oversaw it” and “the FBI covered it up.”\

[...]

This particularly elaborate conspiracy theory, dubbed “Italygate,” is not new and was, in fact, mainlined from QAnon channels to staffers in the first Trump administration during the months between the 2020 election and former President Joe Biden’s inauguration, while Trump was pushing claims the election was “rigged.”

And so on from there. Should that post have been front-page news in the New York Times? We'd say that the answer is yes.

More than five years later, the president has returned to that peculiar claim about the Italian military. In a new column for the New York Times, David French reacts to that news as show:

This Is Not a Drill

[...]

After the F.B.I. raided the Fulton County election center, Trump demanded Obama’s arrest on social media and threatened the prosecution of election workers. He claimed, among other things, that Italian military satellites had hacked the 2020 election and that Obama had “conspired with foreign powers, not one, not two, not three, but four times to overthrow the United States government in 2016.”

The Italian satellite theory is a jolting reminder that Trump will demand that his core supporters believe almost anything he says, no matter how wild or delusional.

As Jonathan Karl reported for ABC News, this theory “was brought to the White House by a woman who went by several aliases, including ‘The Heiress,’ and was known at the Pentagon for her claimed ties to Somali pirates.”

More than five years later, that peculiar theory is suddenly back!

French delivers a frightening warning in the course of that new column. We'll summarize that warning in the days ahead.

We mention these things because of a song we thought we may have heard in several other recent columns in the New York Times. 

We've been hearing a version of that same song on MS NOW as Blue America responds to the latest startling election win. We refer to the Democratic win in a Trump-friendly district in a race for a seat in the Texas State Senate.

The "song" to which we refer is more like a storylinea pleasing claim, proffered by many, according to which the end may finally be drawing near for the MAGA Express.

According to that storyline, it's looking worse and worse for the GOP in this year's scheduled midterm elections. That theory may turn out to be perfectly accuratethough we toss the word "scheduled" into the stew in deference to David French's extremely dire perspective.

Where were we hearing that song sung Blue? In his new column for the Times, Jamelle Bouie worked beneath this headline:

Minneapolis May Be Trump’s Gettysburg

Ezra Klein's new column was published beneath this banner:

Trump Has Overwhelmed Himself

Also, Ruth Ben-Ghiatshe's more of a (highly insightful) academicalmost seemed to be singing the same song in the course of this nuanced guest essay:

History Shows Trump’s Worst Impulses May Backfire on Him

We thought we've heard this song before, dating at least to 2015. It's rarely worked out quite right. 

French's new column stands in extremely gloomy opposition to this possible "song sung Blue." We ourselves would suggest a different perspective, one which may be less dire his.

Have we Blues returned to that upbeat song? We'll pick up here tomorrow.

Tomorrow: A major blue note from French


SATURDAY: Why were the protesters out in the streets?

SATURDAY, JANUARY 31, 2026

Fox & Friends Weekend explains: Yesterday, on a chilly day, they were at it again.

People were marching in the streets"thousands," or possibly "tens of thousands." marching in "sub-zero windchills." Why were those citizens out in those streets? This morning, at the start of the 7 o'clock hour, Fox & Friends Weekend explained.

Griff Jenkins posed the question. Rachel Campos-Duffy responded:

JENKINS (1/31/26): You know, I was just having this conversation with our cameraman, Ted, off camera. You wonder, are they really out there, the protesters in Minneapolis, dealing with like the most frigid temperatures in a long time because they are into the issue? Or are they being paid?

CAMPOS-DUFFY: They're probably being paid. And they're a little crazy. You couldn't get me out there for any amount of money, by the way. I hate cold weather.

On Fox, it's standard messaging. Viewers are constantly told that the others are being paid. For the record, Charlie Hurt had kick-started the rumination by saying this:

HURT: It's kind of like a crazy meter. The crazier you are, the more you like negative 12 degrees to go outside and scream at people.

[LAUGHTER]

In Hurt's world, the others weren't out there stating a view. They were out there "screaming at people."

Jenkins, Campos-Duffy and Hurt are this program's regular co-hosts. To our eye and to our ear, they seem to be three different people.

Jenkins strikes us as wholly sincere. We'd be inclined to venture different capsules concerning the other two friends.

That said, this messaging is constantly offered to viewers of the Fox News Channel. They're out there marching because they've been paid! In our view, there's no way a large modern nation can hope to function this way.

That's an example of the sifting of message which emerges from Silo Red. That said, over here in Blue America, we're also subject to tribal messaging. Consider a highly unusual comment in Michelle Goldberg's new column:

The Fathomless Resentment of Tucker Carlson

[...]

I’ve been thinking about bad faith a lot since reading “Hated by All the Right People,” Jason Zengerle’s shrewd new biography of Tucker Carlson. In the Trump era, many people have shocked their former friends with their authoritarian transformations, but few more than Carlson...

[...]

Carlson’s journey isn’t unique. JD Vance, his closest political ally, has traveled a similar route, from worrying that Trump could be “America’s Hitler” to serving as his vice president. And just like Carlson, who once praised the Hungarian autocrat Viktor Orban for being “hated by all the right people,” Vance has been fueled by hatred. “I think our people hate the right people,” Vance told The American Conservative in 2021. This psychological reliance on loathing, I suspect, accounts for Carlson and Vance’s similar affect. Neither seems, despite phenomenal success, to be very happy. Instead, they radiate spite and grievance, forever making a show of incredulity about the awfulness of their enemies.

Bad faith, obviously, doesn’t belong only to the right. (Just look at the Democrats who assured us all that Joe Biden was up for a re-election campaign.) But Trump’s Republican Party requires of its adherents an exponentially greater degree of mind-warping rationalization. Occasionally this rationalization becomes insupportable, and people break away from Trump’s movement. More often, it’s just corrosive.

Say what? "Bad faith, obviously, doesn’t belong only to the right?" Is Goldberg allowed to say that?

Goldberg occasionally slips such observations into her columns. She sees the problem as much worse in Red America. But she says that an undisclosed number of unnamed Democrats also engaged in "bad faith" in recent years, in the manner she describes in that parenthetical passage.

(Also, perhaps, when the future replacement candidate was sent out to say that the southern border was shut up tight as a drum? When every sane person in America knew that it actually wasn't, often from watching videotape on the Fox News Channel?)

We did this too, President Lincoln once astoundingly said. Given the madness which often prevails Over There within Silo Red, have those of us in Blue America also helped create our former nation's current devolution / descent? 

Why were the protesters out in the streets? On the tightly messaged Fox & Friends Weekend, there could be only one answer.

Are those of us serviced by Silo Blue capable of understanding our own tribe's role in this astoundingly dangerous game? Does the inability to see the real world in all its fullness also, at times, afflict Us?

Next week: Silo Blue?