tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8611810694571930415.post3001121963653657330..comments2024-03-18T23:40:21.985-04:00Comments on the daily howler: 23 YEARS LATER: Does the New York Times have that Clinton problem?<b>bob somerby</b>http://www.blogger.com/profile/02963464534685954436noreply@blogger.comBlogger44125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8611810694571930415.post-89613117192719366432015-10-18T06:36:36.071-04:002015-10-18T06:36:36.071-04:00outlet moncler moncler shop moncler down jackets m...<a href="http://www.monclerjacketsoutletsale2015.com/" title="outlet moncler" rel="nofollow"><strong>outlet moncler</strong></a> <a href="http://www.monclerjacketsoutletsale2015.com/" title="moncler shop" rel="nofollow"><strong>moncler shop</strong></a> <a href="http://www.monclerjacketsoutletsale2015.com/" title="moncler down jackets" rel="nofollow"><strong>moncler down jackets</strong></a> <a href="http://www.monclerjacketsoutletsale2015.com/" title="men moncler jackets" rel="nofollow"><strong>men moncler jackets</strong></a> <a href="http://www.canadagoosejacketsoutletonlinesale.com/" title="canada goose sale" rel="nofollow"><strong>canada goose sale</strong></a> <a href="http://www.canadagoosejacketsoutletonlinesale.com/" title="canada goose jackets" rel="nofollow"><strong>canada goose jackets</strong></a> <a href="http://www.canadagoosejacketsoutletonlinesale.com/" title="canada goose outlet" rel="nofollow"><strong>canada goose outlet</strong></a> <a href="http://www.canadagoosejacketsoutletonlinesale.com/" title="canada goose down" rel="nofollow"><strong>canada goose down</strong></a> <a href="http://www.canadagoosejacketsoutletonlinesale.com/" title="canada goose online" rel="nofollow"><strong>canada goose online</strong></a> <a href="http://www.canadagoosejacketsoutletonlinesale.com/" title="goose down jackets" rel="nofollow"><strong>goose down jackets</strong></a> <a href="http://www.canadagoosejacketsoutletonlinesale.com/" title="canada goose outlet online" rel="nofollow"><strong>canada goose outlet online</strong></a> <a href="http://www.canadagoosejacketsoutletonlinesale.com/" title="canada goose toronto" rel="nofollow"><strong>canada goose toronto</strong></a> <a href="http://www.canadagoosejacketsoutletonlinesale.com/" title="doudoune canada goose" rel="nofollow"><strong>doudoune canada goose</strong></a> <a href="http://www.canadagoosejacketsoutletonlinesale.com/" title="parka canada goose" rel="nofollow"><strong>parka canada goose</strong></a> <a href="http://www.canadagoosejacketsoutletonlinesale.com/" title="canada goose jakke" rel="nofollow"><strong>canada goose jakke</strong></a> <a href="http://www.canadagoosejacketsoutletonlinesale.com/" title="winter jackets canada" rel="nofollow"><strong>winter jackets canada</strong></a> <a href="http://www.canadagoosejacketsoutletonlinesale.com/" title="canada goose outlet stores" rel="nofollow"><strong>canada goose outlet stores</strong></a> <a href="http://www.monclerjacketsoutletsale2015.com/" title="moncler men" rel="nofollow"><strong>moncler men</strong></a> <a href="http://www.monclerjacketsoutletsale2015.com/" title="moncler jackets" rel="nofollow"><strong>moncler jackets</strong></a> <a href="http://www.monclerjacketsoutletsale2015.com/" title="moncler women" rel="nofollow"><strong>moncler women</strong></a> <a href="http://www.monclerjacketsoutletsale2015.com/" title="moncler outlet" rel="nofollow"><strong>moncler outlet</strong></a> <a href="http://www.monclerjacketsoutletsale2015.com/" title="moncler sale" rel="nofollow"><strong>moncler sale</strong></a> <a href="http://www.monclerjacketsoutletsale2015.com/" title="moncler jackets mens" rel="nofollow"><strong>moncler jackets mens</strong></a> <a href="http://www.monclerjacketsoutletsale2015.com/" title="moncler jackets sale" rel="nofollow"><strong>moncler jackets sale</strong></a> <a href="http://www.monclerjacketsoutletsale2015.com/" title="moncler jackets outlet" rel="nofollow"><strong>moncler jackets outlet</strong></a> <a href="http://www.monclerjacketsoutletsale2015.com/" title="moncler online" rel="nofollow"><strong>moncler online</strong></a> <a href="http://www.monclerjacketsoutletsale2015.com/" title="moncler jackets women" rel="nofollow"><strong>moncler jackets women</strong></a> <a href="http://www.monclerjacketsoutletsale2015.com/" title="moncler doudoune" rel="nofollow"><strong>moncler doudoune</strong></a> <a href="http://www.monclerjacketsoutletsale2015.com/" title="moncler femme" rel="nofollow"><strong>moncler femme</strong></a>Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00440261967887444918noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8611810694571930415.post-29133075170671477432015-08-22T12:27:06.584-04:002015-08-22T12:27:06.584-04:00Getting my husband back with the help of professio...Getting my husband back with the help of professional love spell .Dr Brave ??<br /><br /> I'm very excited sharing this amazing testimony about how i save my marriage and get my husband back today, My name is Becky Miller , I live in Los Angeles, California, I'm happily married to a lovely and caring husband ,with three kids. A very big problem occurred in my family seven months ago,between me and my husband .so terrible that he took the case to court for a divorce.he said that he never wanted to stay with me again,and that he didn't love me anymore.So he packed out of the house and made me and my children passed through severe pain. I tried all my possible means to get him back,after much begging,but all to no avail.and he confirmed it that he has made his decision,and he never wanted to see me again. So on one evening,as i was coming back from work,i met an old friend of mine who asked of my husband .So i explained every thing to him,so he told me that the only way i can get my husband back,is to visit a spell caster,because it has really worked for him too.So i never believed in spell,but i had no other choice,than to follow his advice. Then he gave me the email address of the spell caster whom he visited.{bravespellcaster@gmail.com}. So the next morning,i sent a mail to the address he gave to me,and the spell caster assured me that i will get my husband back the next day.What an amazing statement!! I never believed,so he spoke with me,and told me everything that i need to do. Then the next morning, So surprisingly, my husband who didn't call me for the past seven 9 months,gave me a call to inform me that he was coming back.So Amazing!! So that was how he came back that same day,with lots of love and joy,and he apologized for his mistake,and for the pain he caused me and my children. Then from that day,our relationship was now stronger than how it were before,by the help of a spell caster. So, i will advice you out there to kindly visit the same website { http://lovespelldrbrave.weebly.com/. } if you have any problem contact Dr Brave ,{ bravespellcaster@gmail.com }, thanks you Dr Brave, i will always be testifying about your good work. Wendy Owenhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14116036454535424164noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8611810694571930415.post-7379751036108381462015-08-17T03:32:41.667-04:002015-08-17T03:32:41.667-04:00Fulfill your deepest heart desires!!! (eboehispel...Fulfill your deepest heart desires!!! (eboehispellcaster@yahoo.com) <br /><br />Hello, i just want to share my experience and testimony here.. i was married for 4 years to my husband and all of a sudden another woman came into the picture, he started hailing me and he was abusive but i still loved him with all my heart and wanted him at all cost… then he filed for divorce, my whole life was turning apart and i didn't know what to do; he moved out of the house and abandoned the kids.. So a friend of mine told me about trying spiritual means to get my husband back and introduced me to a spell caster… i decided to try it reluctantly although i didn't believe in all those things… then when this great man Dr Eboehi did the special prayers and spell, after 2days, my husband came back and was pleading he had realized his mistakes.. i just couldn't believe it.. anyways we are back together now and we are happy.. In-case anyone of you is passing through any relationship problem i would advise you to email this Great Man via: eboehispellcaster@yahoo.com or call (208) 627-4749 and live a better life. thanks Sylvia Martin from TexasAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8611810694571930415.post-8743017274458375502015-08-17T03:31:55.367-04:002015-08-17T03:31:55.367-04:00Fulfill your deepest heart desires!!! (eboehispel...Fulfill your deepest heart desires!!! (eboehispellcaster@yahoo.com) <br /><br />Hello, i just want to share my experience and testimony here.. i was married for 4 years to my husband and all of a sudden another woman came into the picture, he started hailing me and he was abusive but i still loved him with all my heart and wanted him at all cost… then he filed for divorce, my whole life was turning apart and i didn't know what to do; he moved out of the house and abandoned the kids.. So a friend of mine told me about trying spiritual means to get my husband back and introduced me to a spell caster… i decided to try it reluctantly although i didn't believe in all those things… then when this great man Dr Eboehi did the special prayers and spell, after 2days, my husband came back and was pleading he had realized his mistakes.. i just couldn't believe it.. anyways we are back together now and we are happy.. In-case anyone of you is passing through any relationship problem i would advise you to email this Great Man via: eboehispellcaster@yahoo.com or call (208) 627-4749 and live a better life. thanks Sylvia Martin from TexasAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8611810694571930415.post-699198887960310652015-08-13T18:28:24.216-04:002015-08-13T18:28:24.216-04:00@ 12:25
As opposed to POTUS & FLOTUS using tw...@ 12:25<br /><br />As opposed to POTUS & FLOTUS using two planes to fly to the same destination on the same day.<br /><br /> Cost of Benghazi investigation to be under $3.3 million.<br />Cost to taxpayers of POTUS & FLOTUS separate air travel to L.A. $2.2 million and the FLOTUS trip was for personal reasons.<br /><br />http://www.cnn.com/2015/03/13/politics/barack-michelle-obama-los-angeles-flights/cicerohttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12472612909567425204noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8611810694571930415.post-84776874743477366072015-08-13T16:50:59.730-04:002015-08-13T16:50:59.730-04:00Speaking from Alice's Restaurant, an EPA offic...Speaking from Alice's Restaurant, an EPA official declared, "I cannot tell a lie. We buried that toxic yellow stuff in the bottom of that old mine!"Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8611810694571930415.post-40364684793267980832015-08-13T14:26:24.181-04:002015-08-13T14:26:24.181-04:00@12:25
Explain how the head of Foggy Bottom keepi...@12:25<br /><br />Explain how the head of Foggy Bottom keeping TOP SECRET documents on her Chappaqua server is merely partisan politics and not of concern to national security? cicerohttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12472612909567425204noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8611810694571930415.post-91534943568893160792015-08-13T12:25:45.186-04:002015-08-13T12:25:45.186-04:00The scandal is how much taxpayer money is wasted o...The scandal is how much taxpayer money is wasted on these politically motivated investigations.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8611810694571930415.post-22075991171686434062015-08-13T12:20:08.518-04:002015-08-13T12:20:08.518-04:00Having followed this site for many years, the curr...Having followed this site for many years, the current Clinton scandal resembles the pattern from Whitewater. Allegations of wrongdoing are made and an investigation is started. For Hillary it is Benghazi. The result of this investigation has shown no wrongdoing. It was a faux scandal. Who cares? The investigation does find possible wrongdoing on another matter, using her private e-mail. Investigating her now need to continue. Maybe there is something to the story, but it puts her in another scandal. This is the goal. Regardless of the finding, the scandal still lives out in the media and another example of the Clintons bad acts.<br /><br />Like her husband, there will be an ongoing investigation of Hillary for years to come. It will go from one scandal to the next and the next and the next. If she does win the presidency, a special commission will be named soon after. Having an ongoing investigation that keeps the allegations of wrongdoing in the headlines is one of the ways the war on the Clintons is played. <br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8611810694571930415.post-31768581288700607722015-08-13T12:07:01.962-04:002015-08-13T12:07:01.962-04:00Typical. People answer your questions and you igno...Typical. People answer your questions and you ignore their response because it doesn't cite approved conservative sources.<br /><br />Media Matters collects and distributes info. The info comes from other sources that can be independently evaluated. It is true or not regardless of the political beliefs of Brock.<br /><br />Conservatives do make stuff up, so perhaps they think everyone else does too.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8611810694571930415.post-65406606322023845112015-08-13T11:55:00.138-04:002015-08-13T11:55:00.138-04:00@mm
You do realize that Media Matters is HRC'...@mm<br /><br />You do realize that Media Matters is HRC's personal propaganda machine as is David Brock Super PAC Correct The Record. <br /><br />Now the IG says HRC may have had her minions strip email classification markings.cicerohttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12472612909567425204noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8611810694571930415.post-12992888928058555422015-08-13T11:45:45.742-04:002015-08-13T11:45:45.742-04:00@ 12:58
Bush 43 agrees.
"Former President ...@ 12:58<br /><br />Bush 43 agrees. <br /><br />"Former President George W. Bush said it was a "huge mistake" for him to have been photographed during a flyover trip over New Orleans in the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina. <br /><br />Bush acknowledged the famous photograph showing him looking out the window of Air Force One at the damage in New Orleans made him seem detached from the disaster on the ground that was caused by the massive Hurricane. <br /><br />Bush said the photo, which became a symbol of his administration's response to Katrina, made him look "detached and uncaring, no question about it."<br /><br />"It's always my fault. I mean, I was the one who should have said: 'A) Don't take my picture, B) Let's land in Baton Rouge, La., C) Let's don't even come close to the area.' The next place to be seen is in Washington at a command center. I mean it was my fault," Bush told NBC's Matt Lauer in a special to air Monday evening marking the release of the former president's new book, "Decision Points."<br /><br />Bush faced heavy criticism for his administration's response to the hurricane's devastation in New Orleans. Critics said the president was slow to recognize and respond to the massive disaster on the Gulf Coast. <br /><br />Bush said he wished, in retrospect, that he had landed in New Orleans. He didn't at the time for fear that first responders would have been forced to handle his arrival instead of disaster relief. <br /><br />"In retrospect, however, I should have touched down in Baton Rouge, met with the governor and walked out and said, 'I hear you. We understand. And we're going to help the state and help the local governments with as much resources as needed,'" Bush said. "And then got back on a flight up to Washington. I did not do that. And paid a price for it."<br /><br />http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/127865-bush-katrina-flyover-photo-a-huge-mistakecicerohttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12472612909567425204noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8611810694571930415.post-91857341823698282552015-08-13T11:35:59.132-04:002015-08-13T11:35:59.132-04:00Wow, a wingnut @ 2:51.
And a fool @ 8:58.
Welco...Wow, a wingnut @ 2:51. <br /><br />And a fool @ 8:58.<br /><br />Welcome to internet comments.Sick Sad Worldnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8611810694571930415.post-28688217446756731722015-08-13T08:58:18.038-04:002015-08-13T08:58:18.038-04:00Welcome to your new bed, Bob. You made it.Welcome to your new bed, Bob. You made it.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8611810694571930415.post-11627094466483288772015-08-13T06:37:26.158-04:002015-08-13T06:37:26.158-04:00David,
There is so much bullshit in your last two...David,<br /><br />There is so much bullshit in your last two posts.<br /><br />Think this through logically please. Read again what the State Department spokesman said,<br /><br />"While we work with the Director of National Intelligence to resolve whether, in fact, this material is actually classified, we are taking steps to ensure the information is protected and stored appropriately, Kirby said.<br /><br />That means, even now, the State Department does not agree with the ICIG that the material IS classified. So how, pray tell, could this non-existent mythical creature who sits all day "vetting" all emails before the "send" button is hit would have changed anything?<br /><br />Second, you ignore the obvious fact that these emails had already been circulated between other State Department employees USING the .gov account, before they were forwarded to the Secretary of State. Therefore, can you not see logically that there is no such thing as this invented mythical creature who sits all day "vetting" emails being sent on the .gov system before allowing the "send" button to be hit?<br /><br />Do you not see how preposterous this "news" source of yours is?<br /><br />*****<br />Clinton Campaign: Emails Originated From "Unclassified .Gov Email System." A fact sheet released by the presidential campaign for the former secretary of state explains that the emails at issue originated on "the unclassified .gov email system":<br /><br /><br />Would this issue not have arisen if she used a state.gov email address?<br /><br />Even if Clinton's emails had been on a government email address and government device, these questions would be raised prior to public release.<br /><br />While State Department's review of her 55,000 emails brought the issue to the Inspectors Generals' attentions, the four emails were on the unclassified .gov email system. They were not on the separate, closed system used by State Department for handling classified communications. [hillaryclinton.com, "Updated: The Facts About Hillary Clinton's Emails," accessed 8/12/15]<br />******<br />http://mediamatters.org/research/2015/08/12/myths-and-facts-on-hillary-clintons-email-and-r/204913<br /><br /> <br /><br />mmnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8611810694571930415.post-41730870904133743102015-08-13T02:51:12.543-04:002015-08-13T02:51:12.543-04:00Poor Bob.
Clinton is corrupt, sleazy, deceitful a...Poor Bob.<br /><br />Clinton is corrupt, sleazy, deceitful and, as recently revealed, criminal.<br /><br />You can whine, stamp your little feet and work the refs like mad, but none of it will alter these basic facts, nor the reporting which follows from them.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8611810694571930415.post-33993595306602019432015-08-13T01:30:21.353-04:002015-08-13T01:30:21.353-04:00Indeed. Clinton was Secretary of State, not some ...Indeed. Clinton was Secretary of State, not some random staff person. Let's go over a few things which happened before she reached that office.<br /><br />Hillary Clinton was a former first lady who went through an investigation in that capacity which required production of substantial records. Her handling of that stirred quite a controversy. She served as a US Senator when the issue of disclosure of classified material (including the name of an intelligence operative) was investigated, and missing e-mails among key government officials created quite a controversy. She ran for President, an office in which the occupant, which she surely learned during her earliest days as a lawyer for the House Judiciary Committee impeachment inquiry of Richard Nixon, is not above the law.<br /><br />When she became Secretary of State she had ample personal and professional experience to know how she handled her communications was a matter involving legal and political issues of greater significance than "her convenience."Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8611810694571930415.post-84360652562897752582015-08-13T00:58:50.248-04:002015-08-13T00:58:50.248-04:00It is traditional for the president to visit major...It is traditional for the president to visit major disaster areas and to suspend recreation to coordinate response. Bush didn't do that. Because so many of the victims were poor and black that seemed especially callous. Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8611810694571930415.post-3900368563515925902015-08-13T00:52:11.942-04:002015-08-13T00:52:11.942-04:00This is total B.S. because Clinton was Sec of Stat...This is total B.S. because Clinton was Sec of State not some random staff person.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8611810694571930415.post-90049239702336553832015-08-12T23:13:00.021-04:002015-08-12T23:13:00.021-04:00mm -- I found the source of the above explanation...mm -- I found the source of the above explanation of why the e-mails weren't classified.<br /><br /><i>Clinton’s spokesperson argued that Clinton couldn’t have been aware that the material was classified because it wasn’t specifically marked.<br /><br />But that statement ignores how the process works. The reason government officials with security clearances are required to keep their correspondence on the appropriate government server is so the material can be vetted and classified prior to hitting “send” to an uncleared recipient.<br />The CIA goes to such great lengths to protect classified information that it even requires opposing counsel in legal cases to submit their briefs and exhibits for clearance before they can be filed.<br /><br />Clinton’s argument is a sham. The reason the documents weren’t marked is because she never submitted them for clearance.<br /><br />Moreover, Clinton should have been sufficiently aware of what was “classifiable.”<br /><br />Senior government officials frequently discuss highly classified subjects in both formal and informal ways — sometimes without papers or notes containing markings. Think oral briefings, a common occurrence for government officials.<br /><br />Nevertheless, they’re obligated to understand the nature of the information entrusted to them and to protect it appropriately.</i><br /><br />http://nypost.com/2015/08/11/hillary-clintons-empty-excuses-on-e-mailing-classified-info/<br /><br />P.S. If the New York Times were truly anti-Hillary, I think they would have printed this refutation of Hillary's excuse.David in Calnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8611810694571930415.post-57133056060219965892015-08-12T22:54:18.927-04:002015-08-12T22:54:18.927-04:00mm -- as you know I'm no expert in the field o...mm -- as you know I'm no expert in the field of secret clearance. However, one source suggested that these e-mails hadn't been classified Top Secret because the Hillary team hadn't submitted them for such evaluation. If that's the case, then it could be correct that they weren't classified Top Secret, and also correct that they actually contained information of the highest degree of sensitivity.<br /><br />Hillary's bizarre decision to handle all these e-mails on her personal server is the root of the problem. We have never had a good explanation of why she did that, since it violated various rules and procedures. The best explanation I recall is the allegation that Colin Powell had previously followed such a practice, which turned out to be false.<br /><br />BTW my original point is that a truly anti-Hillary news organ would have given this story more prominence. For an example of how one anti-Hillary organ handled this story, see the Drudge Report. http://www.drudgereport.com/David in Calnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8611810694571930415.post-19591967556625072512015-08-12T22:40:09.373-04:002015-08-12T22:40:09.373-04:00He's always been a fake, mm.He's always been a fake, mm.Greghttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09288008924419574934noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8611810694571930415.post-85844289435359417152015-08-12T21:48:51.419-04:002015-08-12T21:48:51.419-04:00Damn you, David, you completely ignore the State D...Damn you, David, you completely ignore the State Department statement I posted and the question I asked you. The you copy some over the top bullshit from the Daily Beast. You don't just have any fucking intellectual honesty and don't give a damn about the facts. You have your wingnut sources and are content to live in your wingnut bubble.mmnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8611810694571930415.post-48880132039079651192015-08-12T21:14:29.166-04:002015-08-12T21:14:29.166-04:00According to The Daily Beast, Hillary's secret...According to The Daily Beast, Hillary's secret material was the highest degree of top secret. Having such material on her personal server is surely serious enough that a truly anti-Hillary news organ would have displayed it prominently.<br /><br /><i>These weren’t just ordinary secrets found in Clinton’s private server, but some of the most classified material the U.S. government has....<br /><br /> Information at the “TOP SECRET//SI//TK//NOFORN” level is considered exceptionally highly classified and must be handled with great care under penalty of serious consequences for mishandling. Every person who is cleared and “read on” for access to such information signs reams of paperwork and receives detailed training about how it is to be handled, no exceptions—and what the consequences will be if the rules are not followed.<br /><br />People found to have willfully mishandled such highly classified information often face severe punishment. Termination of employment, hefty fines, even imprisonment can result.<br />In the real world, people with high-level clearances are severely punished for willfully violating such rules. At a minimum, those suspected of mishandling things like NSA “signals intelligence”—intercepts calls, emails, and the like—have their clearances suspended pending the outcome of the investigation into their misconduct. Any personal items—computers, electronics—where federal investigators suspect the classified wound up, wrongly, will be impounded and searched. If it has TOP SECRET//SI information on it, “your” computer now belongs to the government, since it is considered classified.<br /><br />People found to have willfully mishandled such highly classified information often face severe punishment. Termination of employment, hefty fines, even imprisonment can result. Yes, people really do go to jail for mishandling classified materials. Matthew Aid, a writer on intelligence matters, served over a year in prison for mishandling TOPSECRET//SI information from NSA, for example. </i><br />http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2015/08/12/the-spy-satellite-secrets-in-hillary-s-emails.htmlDavid in Calnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8611810694571930415.post-38851632404744116982015-08-12T20:56:46.660-04:002015-08-12T20:56:46.660-04:00David,
You do understand that there is some dispu...David,<br /><br />You do understand that there is some dispute between the State Department and the ICIG over whether the material was top secret?<br /><br />***********<br />In a statement Tuesday, State Department spokesperson John Kirby noted that the two e-mails determined to have contained top secret material were "not marked as classified" when they were sent between State Department employees and ultimately forwarded to Clinton.<br /><br />The two e-mails, from 2009 and 2011, were identified before they were made public as part of the department's monthly releases of Clinton e-mails. "While we work with the Director of National Intelligence to resolve whether, in fact, this material is actually classified, we are taking steps to ensure the information is protected and stored appropriately, Kirby said.<br />**************<br />mmnoreply@blogger.com