tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8611810694571930415.post4519276780567430453..comments2024-03-28T14:33:44.704-04:00Comments on the daily howler: Maddow, Kornacki propagandize the tribe!<b>bob somerby</b>http://www.blogger.com/profile/02963464534685954436noreply@blogger.comBlogger37125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8611810694571930415.post-74802064381749056952014-03-26T16:14:36.916-04:002014-03-26T16:14:36.916-04:00My Name is johnson Wilson..I never
believed in Lov...My Name is johnson Wilson..I never<br />believed in Love Spells or Magics until I<br />met this special spell caster when i went<br />to Africa to Execute some business..He is<br />really powerful..My wife and I were divorce with<br />no reason for almost 3 years and i tried<br />all i could to have her back because i really<br />love her so much but all my effort did<br />not work out.. we met at our early age at<br />the college and we both have feelings for<br />each other and we got married happily<br />for 5 years with no kid and she woke up<br />one morning and said it is over between us and she is going to get a divorce..i thought it was a joke and<br />when she came back from work she<br />tender to me a divorce letter and she<br />packed all her loads from my house..i<br />ran mad and i tried all i could to have<br />her back but all did not work out..i was<br />lonely for almost 3 years…So when i told<br />the spell caster what happened he said<br />he will help me and he asked for her full<br />name and her picture..i gave him<br />that..At first i was skeptical but i gave it<br />a try because i have tried so many spell<br />casters and there was no solution…so when<br />he finished with the readings,he got back<br />to me that she’s with a man and that<br />man is the reason why she left me…The<br />spell caster said he will help me with a<br />spell that will surely bring her back.but i<br />never believe all this…he told me i will<br />see a positive result within 3 days..3<br />days later,she called me herself and<br />came to me apologizing and she told me<br />she will come back to me..at first I didn't believe it,it was like a dream because i never<br />believe this will work out after trying<br />many spell casters and there was no<br />solution..The spell caster is so powerful<br />and after that he helped me with a<br />pregnancy spell and my wife got<br />pregnant a month later..we are now<br />happy been together again and with<br />lovely kid..This spell caster has really<br />changed my life and i will forever be <br />thankful to him..he has helped many<br />friends too with similar problem and<br />they are happy and thankful to him..This<br />man is indeed the most powerful spell<br />caster i have ever experienced in life..Am<br />Posting this to the Forum in case there is<br />anyone who has similar problem and still<br />looking for a way out..you can reach him<br />here: alexzanderhightemple@gmail.com......<br />CONTACT THIS POWERFUL SPELL CASTER<br />TODAY VIA EMAI.alexzanderhightemple@gmail.com.<br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8611810694571930415.post-72660317209412249072014-03-26T16:01:17.191-04:002014-03-26T16:01:17.191-04:00AC/MA,
A report written by the same law firm that...AC/MA,<br /><br />A report written by the same law firm that is handling the legal defense of the persons it supposedly investigated? <br /><br />Not even an attempt at a pretense of a fig leaf to conceal the colossal blatant in-your-face F.U. conflict of interest. These people don't believe they have to play by the rules the rest of us must follow. <br /><br />And we're supposed to maintain an objective open mind after the conclusion is already leaked by "someone familiar with the report" to the front page of the NYTimes? Why? Because they say, "trust us". The people who just pocketed over a million dollars to read emails that belong to the public and interview people on the public payroll? <br /><br />mmnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8611810694571930415.post-65879733414364161762014-03-26T14:23:40.921-04:002014-03-26T14:23:40.921-04:00Where are Bob's old friends?
His new ones are...Where are Bob's old friends?<br /><br />His new ones are over at the posts on black kids hating on black kids and cheering on Bob's attacks on uncaring liberals.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8611810694571930415.post-83337773702549052262014-03-26T14:21:54.866-04:002014-03-26T14:21:54.866-04:00I cherish my creator endowed right to skepticism. ...I cherish my creator endowed right to skepticism. I thought I was exercising my first amendment right to dump on the guy who commissioned the report, not the report itself.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8611810694571930415.post-20595348609117799002014-03-26T12:58:00.715-04:002014-03-26T12:58:00.715-04:00I said you guys have the right to be skeptical. I&...I said you guys have the right to be skeptical. I'm skeptical too. But until you read the report, it's premature to pass judgment on it. AC/MAnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8611810694571930415.post-49566559656543093252014-03-26T12:06:47.615-04:002014-03-26T12:06:47.615-04:00First it's Steven Hawking, now it's Maddow...First it's Steven Hawking, now it's Maddow. No one is good enough for the blogger.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8611810694571930415.post-16917224395774170162014-03-26T10:13:29.192-04:002014-03-26T10:13:29.192-04:00AC/MA
I can't speak for all Anons or even AlA...AC/MA<br /><br />I can't speak for all Anons or even AlAnon. However, anyone who needs to spend a million of the taxpayers money on outside legal counsel to find out who on his staff cut off access to toll lanes is incompetent as an administrator and untrustworthy with public funds. Anyone who has a million dollars to hire lawyers and has them declare him guilty is incompetent, untrustworth and a complete fool.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8611810694571930415.post-9958724963643645352014-03-26T06:50:32.085-04:002014-03-26T06:50:32.085-04:00AC / MA,
You mean the investigation of Chris Chri...AC / MA,<br /><br />You mean the investigation of Chris Christie by Chris Christie? You mean the report written by a woman who vacationed with Christie and his family? OK, thank you for your opinion.mmnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8611810694571930415.post-17116932163270246722014-03-26T05:22:54.671-04:002014-03-26T05:22:54.671-04:00mm and anons, as an admitted "fucking lawyer&...mm and anons, as an admitted "fucking lawyer" I agree that your skepticism in advance about the report is warranted, but I don't believe you can opine about the report with any authority until it is published.AC / MAnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8611810694571930415.post-42217759715712424452014-03-26T01:36:55.484-04:002014-03-26T01:36:55.484-04:00Is it Rachel or is it Bob?
Wow! Will this review ...Is it Rachel or is it Bob?<br /><br />Wow! Will this review include real information about the “motivations leading up to the closing of the lanes?” <br /><br />Obviously, we don’t know the answer to that. But it sounds like that could be possible, given the materials to which the authors say they had access.<br /><br />That could all be piddle, of course. The review could be a big dud.<br /><br />But based on what we read in the Times, we felt eager to see this forthcoming review. Then, we got ourselves thoroughly brainwashed last night.<br /><br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8611810694571930415.post-33224108757974810842014-03-26T01:27:13.874-04:002014-03-26T01:27:13.874-04:00She's agitprop. No, she's Joe McCarthy.
Sh...She's agitprop. No, she's Joe McCarthy.<br />She's a witch hunter. No she's a clown.<br />She's a rating hound. No she believes her twaddle.<br /><br />She makes millions. She makes millions.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8611810694571930415.post-28020898150988342382014-03-26T00:03:12.169-04:002014-03-26T00:03:12.169-04:00@ 3:37 said "I do not see the motiviation of ... @ 3:37 said "I do not see the motiviation of a major law firm to get sideways with the truth on this."<br /><br />I don't know about motivation. I thought it was the job of law firms to turn the truth sideways so no matter which way it falls, their clients can run out of harm's way.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8611810694571930415.post-70384527565471326562014-03-25T23:32:24.425-04:002014-03-25T23:32:24.425-04:00"Duh! Everything gets rolled out that way! An..."Duh! Everything gets rolled out that way! And everybody knows it. <br /><br />Go ahead—watch the tape of that segment. You’re watching an attempt at preconditioning, an act of propaganda."<br /><br />Wait. What they did on MSNBC was propaganda. Precodnitioning.<br />But rolling out results to promote in advance a finding of "no guilt for the Governor is not propaganda? It is not preconditioning?<br /><br />Covering a Page 1 story in the New York Times on a topic you have covered since December is pre-conditioning? Just last week ignoring a story in the New York Times was evidence of the "end of the Tulip Craze." <br /><br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8611810694571930415.post-37265929170080211312014-03-25T22:38:54.727-04:002014-03-25T22:38:54.727-04:00Having watched the segment and reread this post I ...Having watched the segment and reread this post I am stunned by the hysteria that seems to be taking over TDH. <br /><br />"Agitprop"? Seriously? Is this post an audition for writing the Y.A.F.<br />alumni newsletter for the Cold War Classes of the mid 20th century?<br /><br />Kornacki and Maddow gave a relatively mild rundown of what was in the Times article. It was pedestrian and, if anything, rather boring.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8611810694571930415.post-71449338661532535902014-03-25T19:25:57.348-04:002014-03-25T19:25:57.348-04:00Your opening quote was a fact which both Maddow an...Your opening quote was a fact which both Maddow and Kornacki discussed. BOBaddow made that discussion "disappear."<br /><br />KZAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8611810694571930415.post-63257702767406730452014-03-25T19:24:12.311-04:002014-03-25T19:24:12.311-04:00In fairness (to use a Bob phrase) the Unreliable b...In fairness (to use a Bob phrase) the Unreliable but Important Mr. Wildstein's attorney did not say they were sitting on evidence. He said "evidence exists." Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8611810694571930415.post-37474822132441567252014-03-25T19:21:07.822-04:002014-03-25T19:21:07.822-04:00Everything but the first line was Bob.Everything but the first line was Bob.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8611810694571930415.post-26194109714427639512014-03-25T19:12:49.374-04:002014-03-25T19:12:49.374-04:00Is Anonymous at 5:00 actually Bob? Is Anonymous at 5:00 actually Bob? Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8611810694571930415.post-47397080384600930232014-03-25T18:24:49.347-04:002014-03-25T18:24:49.347-04:00"Guess what? If they continue to plead the Fi..."Guess what? If they continue to plead the Fifth, it may be that no one will ever interview Wildstein, Kelly or Stepien. Will the failure to “talk to any of those folks” be listed as an objection to future reports from other entities?"<br /><br />Yeah, it will be, by me. They have the right to rely on the 5th Amendment. But would any account be more credible and complete if the three people involved in it recounted events? <br /><br />Yeah, of course it would. <br /><br />We don't have to pretend the information they could provide disappears when they plead the 5th. It's still there. <br /><br />One can recognize the 5th amendment and also believe their testimony is very important or necessary to a complete or believable account of events. <br /><br />That's the trade-off for the protection against self-incrimination. We may never know. Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8611810694571930415.post-56150779299505655922014-03-25T18:11:54.127-04:002014-03-25T18:11:54.127-04:00That was the Old Kornacki, and that story is no lo...That was the Old Kornacki, and that story is no longer operative.<br /><br />We now have the New Kornacki, one who gladly "propagandizes" with the vile, evil, overpaid clown.<br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8611810694571930415.post-81937774840267147202014-03-25T18:10:04.713-04:002014-03-25T18:10:04.713-04:00It will be interesting to see if the "report&...It will be interesting to see if the "report" actually makes Christie stick to a specific timeframe concerning when he first knew and when he stopped knowing it.<br /><br />He has been rather vague, claiming it was through press reports that began on Sept. 13, then later saying it wasn't until Oct. 1 when the WSJ reported Foye's e-mail.<br /><br />It was then that he dispatched his two top people to New York to find out what was going on, well before Baroni testified that it was a "fairness study."<br /><br />And it wasn't until January that he learned his deputy chief of staff ordered the whole thing with an e-mail to his non-childhood non-friend.<br /><br />Meanwhile, we still have the famous letter from the famous non-friend's attorney, saying they are sitting on "evidence" that Christie knew about the "traffic problems" while they were happening. Plus the infamous photo of all of them yukking it up on Sept. 11.<br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8611810694571930415.post-41721823427907060182014-03-25T17:44:23.268-04:002014-03-25T17:44:23.268-04:00"The fun thing will be to see if they bill th..."The fun thing will be to see if they bill three times for each document."<br /><br />That's funny. Do you have any doubt? Hey, what the hell. It's only taxpayer money.mmnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8611810694571930415.post-13827337871729867732014-03-25T17:40:18.631-04:002014-03-25T17:40:18.631-04:00mm Many of the documents they reviewed for the re...mm Many of the documents they reviewed for the report have also been subpoenaed by the Legisalture and the U.S. Attorney.<br /><br />The fun thing will be to see if they bill three times for each document. Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8611810694571930415.post-30314147815827010072014-03-25T17:35:01.049-04:002014-03-25T17:35:01.049-04:00No. But we're all billable. And many are gul...No. But we're all billable. And many are gullible.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8611810694571930415.post-44574336900298718262014-03-25T17:21:18.556-04:002014-03-25T17:21:18.556-04:00Anon 1:57, I have no idea what you're asking.
...Anon 1:57, I have no idea what you're asking.<br /><br /><br />This is the most remarkable exhibition of political chutzpah I can ever recall.<br /><br />From the same Barbaro report in the Times;<br /><br />***<br />Besides the 12 lawyers who worked on the internal investigation, a group of Gibson Dunn lawyers is assigned to respond to the broad subpoenas issued by the Legislature and the United States attorney’s office for records from Mr. Christie’s office.<br />***<br /><br />So let me get this straight. The very same law firm that conducted this thorough investigation is also handling the legal defense of all the people they investigated.<br /><br />Fucking lawyers. They really do rule us all don't they.mmnoreply@blogger.com