tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8611810694571930415.post8127790107309597517..comments2024-03-29T09:38:48.722-04:00Comments on the daily howler: EXPLOSIVE: Was Carter Page a Russkie agent?<b>bob somerby</b>http://www.blogger.com/profile/02963464534685954436noreply@blogger.comBlogger51125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8611810694571930415.post-86015641186880583262021-01-13T15:04:49.378-05:002021-01-13T15:04:49.378-05:00Hello everyone I want to introduce you guys to a g...Hello everyone I want to introduce you guys to a group a private investigators who can help you with information you need in any situation in life and they are ready to follow you step by step until your case is cleared just contact +17078685071 and you will happily ever after <br />Premiumhackservices@gmail.comDavehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15707286545902034421noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8611810694571930415.post-64830033659666631092020-09-16T17:50:39.191-04:002020-09-16T17:50:39.191-04:00I was so anxiuos to know what my husband was alway...I was so anxiuos to know what my husband was always doing late outside the house so i started contacting hackers and was scamed severly until i almost gave up then i contacted this one hacker and he delivered a good job showing evidences i needed from the apps on his phone like whatsapp,facebook,instagram and others and i went ahead to file my divorce papers with the evidences i got,He also went ahead to get me back some of my lost money i sent to those other fake hackers,every dollar i spent on these jobs was worth it.Contact him so he also help you.<br />mail: premiumhackservices@gmail.com<br />text or call +1 4016006790Elizabethhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17641694205083699589noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8611810694571930415.post-91490248644254715162018-10-24T13:31:10.249-04:002018-10-24T13:31:10.249-04:00Hello,
I'm Dr Ogudugu, a real and genuine spe...Hello,<br /><br />I'm Dr Ogudugu, a real and genuine spell caster/Spiritual healer with years of experience in spell casting and an expert in all spells, i specialize exclusively in LOVE SPELL/GET REUNITE WITH EX LOVER, MONEY SPELL, POWERFUL MAGIC RING, ANY COURT CASES, FRUIT OF THE WOMB, HIV CURE, CURE FOR CANCER, HERPES, DIABETE, HERPERTITIS B, PARKINSON’S HERBAL CURE, BECOMING A MERMAID, BECOMING A VAMPIRE, SAVE CHILD BIRTH. They are all %100 Guaranteed QUICK Results, it most work. If you have any problem and you need a real and genuine spell caster to solve your problems, contact me now through my personal Email Address with problem case...Note-you can also Text/Call on WhatsApp.<br /><br />Contact me -<br />Email: greatogudugu@gmail.com<br />WhatsApp No: +27663492930Dr Ogudugu Solution Templehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13936965325660073663noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8611810694571930415.post-92125907459487452592018-05-21T23:41:43.155-04:002018-05-21T23:41:43.155-04:00" ... and maybe up to a dozen Republican vote..." ... and maybe up to a dozen Republican voters."<br /><br /> A dozen? Are you Kevin Drum?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8611810694571930415.post-64388893806637325852018-05-21T23:38:22.818-04:002018-05-21T23:38:22.818-04:00If anyone knows about weasel-speak, it's the i...If anyone knows about weasel-speak, it's the incomparable blogger (aka. "we").redmatnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8611810694571930415.post-25175152321760458102018-05-21T13:53:36.577-04:002018-05-21T13:53:36.577-04:00"...voters who are really concerned with the ..."...voters who are really concerned with the rigged economy."<br /><br />That would be a large segment of Democrats and Independents, and maybe up to a dozen Republican voters.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8611810694571930415.post-76679656326793728762018-05-21T13:45:00.862-04:002018-05-21T13:45:00.862-04:00waylon,
Yes. I think the Democratic party focus o...waylon,<br />Yes. I think the Democratic party focus on the GOP tax cuts, and the grifters like DeVos, Pruitt, etc in the Trump cabinet, who are working for the corporate-rich, will play strong in the midterms with voters who are really concerned with the rigged economy.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8611810694571930415.post-27049738756251334032018-05-21T11:19:45.052-04:002018-05-21T11:19:45.052-04:00I love it when trolls fight with each other.I love it when trolls fight with each other.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8611810694571930415.post-71444620870403789712018-05-21T11:02:11.304-04:002018-05-21T11:02:11.304-04:009:54 - you feel like the Democrats are focused? Fo...9:54 - you feel like the Democrats are focused? Focused on winning in 2020? Focus on rebuilding the party into something that can excite the people into voting?<br /><br />I feel like we're just focused on Trump and waiting for him to fail. That might work. It probably will. I just think we're setting ourselves up for another big disappointment. <br /><br />Thanks for your comment. waylonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02169019514161120820noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8611810694571930415.post-67454473132108601642018-05-21T09:54:03.045-04:002018-05-21T09:54:03.045-04:00"I agree in a way with Mao Chung and Bob that..."I agree in a way with Mao Chung and Bob that we have become a little hysterical and unfocused."<br /><br />Then you are the one unfocused. And your friend into 'outsiders" should have his waitress diner perform his wife's open-heart surgery.<br />Confusing "people who understand how government works" with "elites" is a nod to the dumbing down of the republic.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8611810694571930415.post-85703911199492875292018-05-21T09:38:39.438-04:002018-05-21T09:38:39.438-04:00This is what real media criticism should look like...This is what real media criticism should look like:<br /><br />http://nomoremister.blogspot.com/2018/05/texans-love-guns-without-qualification.htmlAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8611810694571930415.post-18456878561100097532018-05-21T09:20:22.375-04:002018-05-21T09:20:22.375-04:00He'll be 77. Too old. Who's going to be t...He'll be 77. Too old. Who's going to be the new blood? We need someone in their 40's. Who is out there that has the goods? Seems like it would be very, very easy to expose Trump as a fraud with the right rhetoric and charisma. It might have to be a third party. Some rich fuck. Dems don't really know how to boogie. They can't dance. They have no rhythm. Politically speaking. The system is so ripe to be split down the middle as Macron did in France.waylonnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8611810694571930415.post-38101908382718648082018-05-21T08:18:33.536-04:002018-05-21T08:18:33.536-04:00"Too bad. But, people shouldn't make char..."Too bad. But, people shouldn't make charges that they can't prove."<br /><br />Thanks for this. Everyone who I bet that Hillary isn't corrupt owes me 20 bucks. Now I'm rich enough to run for POTUS.<br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8611810694571930415.post-59291849336702021082018-05-21T03:27:44.219-04:002018-05-21T03:27:44.219-04:00Nony T. Fifty VII, the Quaint American: a person o...Nony T. Fifty VII, the Quaint American: a person of R,W,&B extraction who thinks any variation of this latest in The American Tragicomic Drama is relevant to how his or her government actually works, the irony of which is this putative rejection of the hypothetical synthesized with an unwitting theoretical belief in how things are going to be.<br /><br />Forever ignored by the Quaint American is the extent to which highly questionable collusion as it relates to their putative perception of that which amounts to disloyalty to a nation and her citizens, electorally and otherwise, is applied as narrowly or broadly as possible depending on the brand of betrayal they're most eager to elect. As a result, the legendary Continuity of Government, with all its crimes and misdemeanors, goes unabated, the majority of that continues without comment.davidlyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04754707934311038544noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8611810694571930415.post-20487931363252114952018-05-20T22:57:58.674-04:002018-05-20T22:57:58.674-04:00You keep positing a hypothetical that is not what ...You keep positing a hypothetical that is not what happened. Trump did collude, Mueller will prove it. Hillary did nothing wrong. You think that if you keep saying this stuff it will cloud the issue but this won't be decided on the internet. Trump will be tried and convicted because he is guilty as hell.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8611810694571930415.post-60202441758601542662018-05-20T22:05:58.129-04:002018-05-20T22:05:58.129-04:00The answer is, Of course not. And if Trump receiv...The answer is, Of course not. And if Trump received information a Hillary scandal from some Russians, that wouldn't be collusion either, if that's all he did.<br />David in Calhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09068188536758619565noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8611810694571930415.post-39454219722959171772018-05-20T16:41:26.628-04:002018-05-20T16:41:26.628-04:00Hillary would have immediately gone to the FBI whe...Hillary would have immediately gone to the FBI when approached by such a contact, as would anyone who is not a traitor. So, no, she wouldn't be guilty of accepting anything.<br /><br />Because of her experience as Secretary of State, Hillary above all other candidates would understand the implications of such an approach. That's why experience matters in elections and why those supporting Trump, Bernie, Jill Stein were foolish to argue that it didn't matter that they had no real qualifications for the presidency.<br /><br />But, ignorance of the law is no excuse.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8611810694571930415.post-44151815925237144962018-05-20T16:37:20.546-04:002018-05-20T16:37:20.546-04:00So, you're supporting Joe Biden then?So, you're supporting Joe Biden then?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8611810694571930415.post-48651161398477044592018-05-20T16:28:21.849-04:002018-05-20T16:28:21.849-04:00mm -- suppose a Russian had told Hillary Clinton t...mm -- suppose a Russian had told Hillary Clinton the details of how Trump had colluded with the Russians. Anon - would Hillary be guilty of illegally accepting a foreign contribution? mm - Would she be guilty of collusion, even though she offered no quid pro quo?David in Calhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09068188536758619565noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8611810694571930415.post-44064781436248863412018-05-20T15:52:34.581-04:002018-05-20T15:52:34.581-04:00I have a bad feeling about all this. They can chas...I have a bad feeling about all this. They can chase Trump about Russia and that is all well and good and we will see what happens. But Democrats need to get the party together and reubild it around Bernie's platform and ideas and introduce new leadership that doesn't come accross as so calicified and elite. We need to figure out a way to stir people's souls based on our ideas and who we are.<br /><br />I had lunch with a friend who voted for Trump and he told me he would have voted for Bernie. That likes Bernie. People just want someone who is from or seems to be an outsider. <br /><br />We can hope that Trump is upended by all his myriad incompetence and nefariousness but while we wait for that to happen, we need to be rebuilding the party to be relevant in new times. We have to do a lot of thinking about who we are. <br /><br />I agree in a way with Mao Chung and Bob that we have become a little hysterical and unfocused. Bob has a shitty tone in the way he says it, and it's hard to take criticism but I think we need to constructively criticize ourselves and realize we need to be a lot more focused and open and smart than we have been. waylonnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8611810694571930415.post-56697540909410212542018-05-20T15:50:15.224-04:002018-05-20T15:50:15.224-04:00Look at poor Comrade DinC lugging that goal around...Look at poor Comrade DinC lugging that goal around on his back searching desperately for a safe place to set it down.<br /><br /><em>...as long as there isn't a quid pro quo. </em><br /><br />Wrong, traitor. Wherever did you get that idea? Sean Hannity?<br /><br /><br />mmnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8611810694571930415.post-91839468930591231342018-05-20T14:14:24.479-04:002018-05-20T14:14:24.479-04:00Since campaigns pay for opposition research, givin...Since campaigns pay for opposition research, giving such research to a campaign is considered a contribution to it. Foreign governments and individuals are not allowed to make contributions to US campaigns. This is not about quid pro quo -- that is relevant to bribery and influence peddling, in which money is given for access or favors. Trump is guilty if he knew about and/or participated in crimes committed by his campaign staff or while president. <br /><br />Collusion no doubt has a legal definition and I suspect it may be different than yours. But, if Trump knew about these meetings in which the Russians proposed helping Trump attain office in return for easing of sanctions, he colluded. It is easy to demonstrate he knew about them because of his own statements in his speeches about Hillary and Wikileaks. But I fully expect that Mueller will have a great deal more evidence, some of it testimony of people who were at those meetings and who witnesses behind the scenes conversations about Russia and who themselves met with Russians for various purposes. There is a lot of information and Mueller has it, so this is not going to be a question of "if" but "when" Mueller finishes his work.<br /><br />I don't read mm as saying that collusion is hard to prove. I read him as saying that your standard for proving collusion is ridiculous. But it won't be up to you. It will be up to congress and perhaps the courts.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8611810694571930415.post-56547743183562799132018-05-20T13:50:07.844-04:002018-05-20T13:50:07.844-04:00mm -- your sarcasm is accurate. If the Russians, ...mm -- your sarcasm is accurate. If the Russians, or anyone else, gives one campaign dirt about the opponent, that's perfectly legal, as long as there isn't a quid pro quo. <br /><br />You correctly say collusion is difficult to prove. Too bad. But, people shouldn't make charges that they can't prove. The onus is on the accuser. Unproved accusations mean nothing. <br /><br />It doesn't work to say, "I can't prove that Trump colluded with the Russians, but collusion is hard to prove, so Trump is guilty."David in Calhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09068188536758619565noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8611810694571930415.post-82355804609799021842018-05-20T13:03:44.315-04:002018-05-20T13:03:44.315-04:00Bob - Trump used "spy" in a tweet on May...Bob - Trump used "spy" in a tweet on May 18.Jonny Scrum-halfnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8611810694571930415.post-29923514889708648492018-05-20T11:58:22.170-04:002018-05-20T11:58:22.170-04:00I am noticing a similarity between DinC's stan...I am noticing a similarity between DinC's standards of evidence and Somerby's.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com