tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8611810694571930415.post8735977906809102469..comments2024-03-29T06:09:09.845-04:00Comments on the daily howler: Henneberger speaks: History starts to happen!<b>bob somerby</b>http://www.blogger.com/profile/02963464534685954436noreply@blogger.comBlogger4125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8611810694571930415.post-11210583009751393062012-09-12T02:43:23.972-04:002012-09-12T02:43:23.972-04:00Great day time. I like your post. It all appears w...<br />Great day time. I like your post. It all appears wonderful <a href="http://www.vipdiablo3.com/" rel="nofollow">Diablo 3 Items</a> <br /><br /><br /><a href="http://www.mmolive.de/" rel="nofollow">Billig WoW Gold</a> <br />Diablo III itemshttp://www.vipdiablo3.com/noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8611810694571930415.post-17629180273969360972012-02-02T20:16:28.690-05:002012-02-02T20:16:28.690-05:00The press *still* hates Gore. Just see Jacob Weis...The press *still* hates Gore. Just see Jacob Weisberg's lunatic rant in today's Slate.com. I have long doubted the theory that Gore-hatred springs from Clinton-hatred. It strikes me as a malady unto itself. <br /><br />And Hieronymus Braintree: it is bogus to day Gore "let himself be vandalized," any candidate who tries just gets ridiculed even more. He couldn't have done anything about it. It was up to the Democratic and liberal world to raise holy hell, just like the conservatives do. But as Somerby notes (again and again), nobody did.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8611810694571930415.post-16623858924902766112012-02-02T19:32:57.706-05:002012-02-02T19:32:57.706-05:00I don't want to harp either but 1999 and 2000 ...I don't want to harp either but 1999 and 2000 was just an extraordinary time in which, as Bob points out, Gore was trashed not because of Gore but because of the press dislike of Bill Clinton. Just what was Gore to do, with the poor treatment in the media not only in favor of Bill Bradley but of George W. Bush. Gore *still* won, but a combination of factors allowed GW Bush to become selected President. Should Gore have been monitoring Lexis-Nexus to respond to all the RNC garbage being repeated at the Post and Times ? I didn't discover how bad it was until I found this site around 2002, when I was *out of work*. As a black man, I see what is going on with Obama but it was really bad with Bill Clinton, even going back to when he was [my] home state Governor. Gore could not have "defended" himself when the clowns were already repeating RNC talking points. And what does refuse to defend himself mean ? "Bill Clinton and I do not wear earth tones or 3 button suits"<br /><br />Really ? <br /><br />-PT DennisAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8611810694571930415.post-75685293712831168982012-02-02T17:57:44.881-05:002012-02-02T17:57:44.881-05:00Forgive me for harping on this but no one correcte...Forgive me for harping on this but no one corrected the record about all the misquotes of Al Gore including, most importantly, Al Gore himself. If he had pointed out that he was being lied about and turned the tables on the press and asked why they were being such weird, lying exaggerators, he would, in all likelihood, now be enjoying his presidential pension. But, no. He refused to defend himself and decided to go all Mr. Positive Attitude. Gore was a victim of unfair press coverage because he let himself be victimized.Hieronymus Braintreehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05303938809800287873noreply@blogger.com