tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8611810694571930415.post8805061898374740399..comments2024-03-28T17:04:22.146-04:00Comments on the daily howler: Supplemental: Rachel rolls her eyes at Jesus himself!<b>bob somerby</b>http://www.blogger.com/profile/02963464534685954436noreply@blogger.comBlogger57125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8611810694571930415.post-79815385328583698812015-07-02T15:37:47.045-04:002015-07-02T15:37:47.045-04:00Attention:
My Name is Jane Mercy, I wish to shar...Attention:<br /><br /><br />My Name is Jane Mercy, I wish to share my testimonies with the general public about what this man called Dr Otis Darko spell temple, on what he has just done for me , this man has just brought back my lost Ex husband with his great spell, I was married to this man called Mathew we were together for a long time and we love each other but when I was unable to give him a child after 2 years, he left me and told me he can’t continue anymore then I was now looking for ways to get him back until a friend of mine told me about this man. My friend gave his email to me and asked me to contact him but I didn't want to because I doubted at first but later reconsidered because it's so rear for a man to be as powerful like she said. So I contacted her through this email ( otisdarko60@yahoo.com ) You won’t believe this when I contacted this man and told him my problems he cast the spell and my ex came back begging on his knees and asking me to forgive him. Not only that after a month I miss my monthly flow, when I went to my doctor, he confirm that I am pregnant so I told myself that I will testify to the whole wide world about the wonders of the powerful man if I give birth successfully. I am so happy today because I am a mother of a bouncing baby girl, thank you once again the great Dr Shakes Spear for what you have done for me, if you are out there passing through any of the following situations :<br /><br />(1) If you want your ex-back.<br />(2) If you always have bad dreams.<br />(3) You want to be promoted in your office.<br />(4) You want women/men to run after you.<br />(5) If you want a child.<br />(6) You want to be rich.<br />(7) You want to tie your husband/wife to be yours forever.<br />(8) If you need financial assistance.<br />(9) Herbal care<br />(10) if you are unable to satisfy your wife sex desire due to low err action.<br />(11) If your menstruation refuse to come out the day it suppose or over flows.<br />(12) If your work refuse to pay you, people owing you.<br />(13) Solve a land issue and get it back.<br />(14) Did your family Denny you of your right?<br />(15) Do you have a low sperm count?<br />(16) Are you contesting for any political position in your country?<br />(17) Case solves E.T.C<br /><br />You are free to contact him at ( otisdarko60@yahoo.com ) ..... CONTACT HIM NOW FOR ALL ANSWERS TO ANY KIND OF PROBLEMS: otisdarko60@yahoo.com<br />ALL ANSWERShttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15546079593853825018noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8611810694571930415.post-58695288394386429952015-07-02T15:37:07.233-04:002015-07-02T15:37:07.233-04:00My life is back!!! After 8 years of marriage, my h...My life is back!!! After 8 years of marriage, my husband left me and left me with our three kids. I felt like my life was about to end, and was falling apart. I contacted you and after I explained you my problem. In just 24hours, my husband came back to us and show me and my kids much love and apologize for all the pain he have bring to the family. We solved our issues, and we are even happier than before DR OTIS DARKO you are the best spell caster i really appreciate the love spell you casted for me to get the man back to my life i will keep sharing more testimonies to people about your good work Thank you once again DR OTIS DARKO at otisdarko60@yahoo.com incase you are in any problem you can contact this man for help he is always there in his temple to help you solve your problem Contact Email is: otisdarko60@yahoo.com. CONTACT HIM TODAY VIA THIS EMAIL ADDRESS: otisdarko60@yahoo.comALL ANSWERShttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15546079593853825018noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8611810694571930415.post-10296645077060521442014-09-11T12:22:27.824-04:002014-09-11T12:22:27.824-04:00urban legend, you ask for something, anything to w...urban legend, you ask for something, anything to work with, and that snark doesn't cut it. deadrat complies, and you respond with snark.<br /><br />pathetic.<br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8611810694571930415.post-57503099603202568712014-09-11T11:25:54.481-04:002014-09-11T11:25:54.481-04:00What if the juror's answer had been "No R...What if the juror's answer had been "No Rachel, it was a piece of cake compared to birthin babies. But you wouldn't know nothing about that." Or she could have said, "Well, I'd rather have been at home watching Meredith Vieira live just like me, but on a scale of 1 to 10 I'd have to give it a 6.5."Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8611810694571930415.post-10312278787866000602014-09-11T11:08:41.937-04:002014-09-11T11:08:41.937-04:00As your replies to them are of Somerby like qualit...As your replies to them are of Somerby like quality. Dr. U. Cacanoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8611810694571930415.post-55246020901542694192014-09-11T02:20:23.187-04:002014-09-11T02:20:23.187-04:00Um, except for the fact that the question was a wa...Um, except for the fact that the question was a waste of time. Who cares how difficult jury service was?<br /><br />So you object to my epithet for Rachel Maddow. Too bad.<br /><br />Now as to all those words. Did you read them? If so, how difficult was that for you?deadratnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8611810694571930415.post-55551331798332342852014-09-11T00:17:34.379-04:002014-09-11T00:17:34.379-04:00Um, except for the fact that only a juror could an...Um, except for the fact that only a juror could answer how difficult it was for "you." <br /><br />"Darlin' Rachel." I wonder who coined that? I count eight of those. Did I miss some?<br /><br />I guess you've got her dead to rights. You certainly win on number of words needed to plead your case.urban legendnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8611810694571930415.post-85736107280902570042014-09-10T23:22:07.029-04:002014-09-10T23:22:07.029-04:00Alas my influence is limited to gentle snark relen...Alas my influence is limited to gentle snark relentlessly applied, and KZ is immune to it. Just be glad that KZ is back to posting comments about casting spells. It is his best work.deadratnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8611810694571930415.post-23048898864750259892014-09-10T21:58:46.801-04:002014-09-10T21:58:46.801-04:00urban legend,
Are you fucking kidding me with thi...urban legend,<br /><br />Are you fucking kidding me with this? When I say it's thin gruel, I mean the answers to the questions Darlin' Rachel asked didn't actually require a juror to answer them. <i>How difficult was this for you?</i> Sheesh!<br /><br />Darlin' Rachel has a career in sportscasting where she can ask coaches why their teams lost and get the answer "We didn't score enough points."<br /><br />Do you understand the size and heft of the stick the government wields here? Do you understand the latitude that the prosecution operates under? (This is independent of whether the McDonnells deserved the thrashing they got.) I didn't, and if you did, I guarantee that you didn't come by that understanding from Darlin' Rachel. Here's what I learned with no help from her.<br /><br />The gov does not have to show that everyone you were indicted with were parties to the criminal agreement or that if you agreed in part, that you agreed all the means and methods. They don't have to show that you were there to help initiate the conspiracy or that you knew all the details. The size of your role and the strength of your connection is immaterial to your membership in the conspiracy. The gov doesn't need to show that the conspiracy was successful -- a failed conspiracy is as bad as a money maker. One of the crimes alleged was depriving the public of honest services, but the gov doesn't have to show that any person was actually deprived of anything. Even if you as a private citizen owed nobody a duty of honest services, you can still be guilty of honest services fraud. (That's what will put Mrs McD in the slammer.)<br /><br />Bribery is the exchange of valuables for official actions, but it includes solicitation, so nobody has to actually accept anything of value or do anything in return. Solicitation does not require that anything actually be expressed. Circumstantial evidence and logical inference is sufficient. You needn't actually take any bribes for yourself, directly or indirectly. It's enough for the swag to be directed to someone else. The gov need not correlate valuables with actions. A pattern of favorable actions is enough, and future unperformed actions can be considered if you're essentially on retainer for favors yet to be performed.<br /><br />It doesn't matter whether you also had a lawful motive for accepting the valuables; it doesn't matter that whatever you did, you were going to do anyway, and it doesn't matter if what you did was legal or beneficial.<br /><br />It doesn't matter if what you did wasn't part of your official, legally-defined duties; it doesn't matter whether you actually had the authority to do what you promised; it doesn't matter if what you did accomplished anything. A single step toward doing something is as culpable as the whole journey.<br /><br />To give these charges a federal hook, the acts must have affected interstate commerce in some way. But the effect can be minimal, and it can even be positive.<br /><br />This is where we are in the public policy on political corruption. Too far? Not far enough? Par for the course? How about a news program examine these questions instead of having its host mug for the camera as she pretends to divide by twelve to gloat about how long the McDonnells will spend in prison?<br /><br />We may not realize it, the McDonnells Jesus-bothering friends may not, most of Virginia's citizens may not, but It's all pretty much in line with what the 4th Circuit has held, so my guess is that the McDonnells are gonna need help from the Supreme Court to bail them out of this.<br /><br />They may get it or they may not. If we rely on Darlin' Rachel, we'll be in the dark in either case.deadratnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8611810694571930415.post-74848669227696739112014-09-10T17:25:27.176-04:002014-09-10T17:25:27.176-04:00If you want to find no substance, you will find no...If you want to find no substance, you will find no substance. Talk about a negative that is impossible to refute -- and, therefore, a negative that is irresponsible to state! If it's "thin gruel," I suppose you mean Rachel should have found a more articulate juror who was willing to go on national TV.<br /><br />If you want us to see your vision of Rachel, give us something, anything, to work with. "Snark" and "clowning" and "smirking" do not cut it.urban legendnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8611810694571930415.post-29870826897224271992014-09-10T14:30:33.628-04:002014-09-10T14:30:33.628-04:00deadrat, can't you use your influence to keep ...deadrat, can't you use your influence to keep KZ from shouting?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8611810694571930415.post-45721038021852809152014-09-10T14:29:45.002-04:002014-09-10T14:29:45.002-04:00Many people can't divide 30 by 12. Humans can...Many people can't divide 30 by 12. Humans can't. They cannot reason. I learned that in multiple posts (too many for me to count) from Bob, who would never waste time by repeating such vast imponderable but essential questions.<br /><br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8611810694571930415.post-71587165245654045402014-09-10T13:11:55.927-04:002014-09-10T13:11:55.927-04:00Here are the six questions Darlin' Rachel aske...Here are the six questions Darlin' Rachel asked the juror and the juror's answers. I'm paraphrasing but I don't think unfairly.<br /><br />1. <i>How difficult was this for you?</i> There was a lot to take in.<br /><br />2. <i>Did the judges instructions clarify things for you?</i> Yes<br /><br />3. <i>How did you assess the McDonnells' marriage?</i> There was strain.<br /><br />4. <i>Could the McDonnells have conspired?</i> Yes.<br /><br />4. <i>Why didn't you convict on the counts of lying to banks?</i> There wasn't enough evidence.<br /><br />5. <i>Did you want Mrs. McDonnell to testify?</i> It could have been interesting but she wouldn't swayed me. <br /><br />If you found this interesting, then you're easily entertained. I'll bet you could have written the answers from the questions yourself without listening to the juror.<br /><br />I forced myself to listen to both parts of that TRMS, and TDH is right about the clowning, smirking, and snarking. But in his outrage about Darlin' Rachel's performance, his downplays the major problem with her show. It's as he notes, but only in passing, "thin gruel." For instance, Darlin' Rachel figured out that the federal sentencing guidelines suggest a sentence of 8-10 years for Bob McD. This is better than the lazy reporters who multiplied the number of counts in the indictment by the maximum sentence to say that the McDonnells were possibly facing decades in prison. But this is a minor point, and it's not worth 4 minutes of airtime, including her pretending to add numbers to 30 and divide by 12. The whole show is like that, without substance to the point of gossamer.deadratnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8611810694571930415.post-50768495014493259632014-09-10T12:32:20.878-04:002014-09-10T12:32:20.878-04:00IS A TESTIMONY, I NEVER BELIEVED IN LOVE SPELLS UN...IS A TESTIMONY, I NEVER BELIEVED IN LOVE SPELLS UNTIL I MET THIS SPELL CASTER CALLED DR UNITY. HE IS REALLY POWERFUL AND COULD HELP CAST SPELLS TO BRING BACK ONE'S GONE,LOST,MISBEHAVING LOVER AND MAGIC MONEY SPELL OR SPELL FOR A GOOD JOB.I'M NOW HAPPY & A LIVING TESTIMONY COS THE WOMAN I HAD WANTED TO MARRY LEFT ME 3 WEEKS BEFORE OUR WEDDING AND MY LIFE WAS UPSIDE DOWN COS OUR RELATIONSHIP HAS BEEN ON FOR 3YEARS... I REALLY LOVED HER, BUT HER MOTHER WAS AGAINST US AND I HAD NO GOOD PAYING JOB. SO WHEN I MET THIS SPELL CASTER, I TOLD HIM WHAT HAPPENED AND EXPLAINED THE SITUATION OF THINGS TO HIM..AT FIRST I WAS UNDECIDED,SKEPTICAL AND DOUBTFUL, BUT I JUST GAVE IT A TRY. AND IN 48HOURS WHEN I WAS IN MY HOUSE IN USA,SHE CALLED ME BY HERSELF AND CAME TO ME, APOLOGIZING THAT EVERYTHING HAD BEEN SETTLED WITH HER MOM AND FAMILY AND SHE GOT A NEW JOB INTERVIEW SO WE SHOULD GET MARRIED..I DIDN'T BELIEVE IT COS THE SPELL CASTER ONLY ASKED FOR MY NAME AND MY GIRLFRIENDS NAME AND ALL I WANTED HIM TO DO... WELL WE ARE HAPPILY MARRIED NOW AND WE ARE EXPECTING OUR LITTLE KID,AND MY WIFE ALSO GOT THE NEW JOB AND OUR LIVES BECAME MUCH BETTER. IN CASE ANYONE NEEDS THE SPELL CASTER FOR SOME HELP, HIS EMAIL ADDRESS IS;unitylovetemple@gmail.com THANKS DR UNITY FOR YOUR GOOD WORK. ONCE AGAIN HIS EMAIL ADDRESS IS unitylovetemple@gmail.com<br />dr brighthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15618775542355611485noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8611810694571930415.post-49576575913320978052014-09-10T10:59:32.439-04:002014-09-10T10:59:32.439-04:00Unlike the mind-reading 12:55, I have no idea how ...Unlike the mind-reading 12:55, I have no idea how "distraught" this "McDonnell family friend" was when he compared Ultrasound to Jesus.<br /><br />But I do know that I, as a Christian, am deeply offended by such a comparison and a trivialization of the message for which Christ suffered and died.<br /><br />Which was quite a different message than McDonnell, self-proclaimed Christian, was selling to the people of Virginia.<br /><br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8611810694571930415.post-48297619840638590102014-09-10T10:58:49.836-04:002014-09-10T10:58:49.836-04:00You are disgusting @ 10:41. That comment was sexis...You are disgusting @ 10:41. That comment was sexist and probably racist. Plus it rolls its eyes at the reverence with which many Americans, and particularly those in Baltimore, hold their NFL players. And I wrote it.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8611810694571930415.post-67411330230167733192014-09-10T10:55:51.251-04:002014-09-10T10:55:51.251-04:00Somerby, in my view is right about Maddow expressi...Somerby, in my view is right about Maddow expressing a little too much happiness with the outcome of the trial in the first segment he linked. But clearly she did not clown. Bob uses many negative adjectives. Not once does he assert a factual error was made.<br /><br />And notice how quickly he dismissed the second segment, the interview with the juror as "worthless" in which she "wasted time."<br />I found the interview respectful and interesting.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8611810694571930415.post-37887972455451174332014-09-10T10:46:10.629-04:002014-09-10T10:46:10.629-04:00Bob appears to be too distracted by proving how al...Bob appears to be too distracted by proving how all journalists live by focusing on the digs of a game show/talk show host, and by showing how poor Gov. Ultrasound really did nothing worthy of conviction of 11 felony counts to get around to the Rice case now.<br /><br />But when he does, perhaps today, perhaps tomorrow, perhaps not for a couple of weeks, he will ring his hands over how "progressives" are failing us on the issue of domestic violence by calling attention to this case, which really isn't much at all.<br /><br />Just some professional athlete drawing his fist back and clocking his fiance, now wife, with full force, then dragging her unconscious body out of the elevator.<br /><br />Nothing to see there, move along. It is the Somerby M.O.<br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8611810694571930415.post-15668170948696810782014-09-10T10:41:24.674-04:002014-09-10T10:41:24.674-04:00Lol!Lol!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8611810694571930415.post-2865061604121395592014-09-10T10:38:23.634-04:002014-09-10T10:38:23.634-04:00Well, I disagree that the video told us "noth...Well, I disagree that the video told us "nothing more than we already knew."<br /><br />And apparently, so do the Baltimore Ravens and the NFL.<br /><br />I am amazed, however, at the lengths Bob's well-trained rubes will go to minimize that which they want to minimize in order to cluck their superior tongues attached to their superior heads at the preferred targets.<br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8611810694571930415.post-73587431909416576632014-09-10T09:44:27.556-04:002014-09-10T09:44:27.556-04:00Laura, please use my testimony. In the elevator o...Laura, please use my testimony. In the elevator on the way back from the casino, my man Ray cold cocked my worthless<br />butt for doing something that offended his manhood. After being knocked cold and drug out of there like a side of beef, the whole thing ended up on national TV. I apologized and Ray Ray married me anyway. Now he has lost his job for what he did to me. Can you please conjure up a spell which gives me the money he would have made and an anullment?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8611810694571930415.post-80408616453457784002014-09-10T09:39:27.883-04:002014-09-10T09:39:27.883-04:00Yes indeed, 9:12 AM. I know many otherwise discer...Yes indeed, 9:12 AM. I know many otherwise discerning conservatives who have been played into watching Maddow<br />so they can be fooled into thinking liberals hold them and their values in contempt.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8611810694571930415.post-8721644718807998602014-09-10T09:12:53.509-04:002014-09-10T09:12:53.509-04:00Maddow does the work of Fox and Drudge for them. ...Maddow does the work of Fox and Drudge for them. Fox and Drudge want people to think liberals hold conservative rank and file in contempt .., that they are elitists who look down on them. That's the impression she gives off. It's bad for liberals. We libs have a hard time differentiating between the conservative rank and file that get played and the powerful people who play them.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8611810694571930415.post-44669826369239253952014-09-10T01:46:57.910-04:002014-09-10T01:46:57.910-04:00"We the people are dumb." Brendan "..."We the people are dumb." Brendan "Bob" Somerby<br /><br />Brendan Sullivan was Steven's attorney. Emmet G. Sullivan was a potted plant.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8611810694571930415.post-25472554734242646032014-09-10T01:38:36.184-04:002014-09-10T01:38:36.184-04:00I roll my eyes at Bob claiming Maddow's eye r...I roll my eyes at Bob claiming Maddow's eye rolling was at Jesus.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com