WE RESUME OUR PREVIOUS JAILBREAK: It's all the absence of logic now!

MONDAY, DECEMBER 3, 2018

The silence of the logicians:
Back in the fall—back in September—we were in the process of staging a personal jailbreak.

In effect, we were saying goodbye to most of this.

We were finally giving up the ghost! We were abandoning a badly failed idea—the idea that there's some conceivable point to critiquing the work of the press corps.

By the fall of 1997, we thought the situation was so bad that we decided to start this site. We could say that we were prophetic—we could say it, but it would be wrong.

When we started planning this site, we thought things were extremely bad—so bad that, not unlike Howard Beale, we just couldn't take it any more.

That said, we had no idea how bad things were going to get.

In the shorter run, we had no idea that the press corps' conduct could descend to the level displayed all through Campaign 2000. We refer to the "war against Gore" the mainstream press waged for twenty straight months, starting in March 1999.

We had no idea that the mainstream press could engage in conduct that awful. We certainly had no idea that this rancid, brain-dead "journalistic" culture could be sustained and furthered to the point where we'd end up with a President Trump, the situation which came to pass in the wake of Campaign 2016.

Back in 1997, a true Cassandra might have seen these slow trains coming. Around here, we did not. We already thought the corps' conduct was stunningly bad. We had no idea that it could get as bad as it quickly did.

Along the way, this site did manage to prove one thing. We proved that there are certain situations, and certain facts, which, in accord with Hard Pundit Law, will never be discussed or examined by the mainstream press.

(We think this is what Chomsky describes as "manufactured consent," though we haven't read the book and therefore aren't real sure.)

We aren't the only ones who have proven that there are certain facts and situations the press will never report, discuss or acknowledge. We think others have made this same demonstration, among them Gene Lyons, Lyons and Conason, Paul Krugman, Kevin Drum.

As if by rule of law, certain extremely basic data will never be reported. Certain situations will never be described.

What explains this peculiar state of affairs? We'll let Kreugman explain it as only he can. In early August 2004, he started a column like this:
KRUGMAN (8/3/04): A message to my fellow journalists: check out media watch sites like campaigndesk.org, mediamatters.org and dailyhowler.com. It's good to see ourselves as others see us. I've been finding The Daily Howler's concept of a media ''script,'' a story line that shapes coverage, often in the teeth of the evidence, particularly helpful in understanding cable news.

For example, last summer, when growth briefly broke into a gallop, cable news decided that the economy was booming. The gallop soon slowed to a trot, and then to a walk. But judging from the mail I recently got after writing about the slowing economy, the script never changed...
Krugman's example to the side, the basic point he stated that day was accurate. Much of what we read in the mainstream press is, in fact, a product of novelization and "script."

To an astounding degree, our upper-end journalists do work from "story lines that shapes coverage, often in the teeth of the evidence." When the preferred story line is contradicted by even the most basic evidence, the evidence, by force of law, is going to disappear.

These facts are highly counterintuitive, but they're facts nonetheless.

No matter how basic the evidence may be, the evidence will disappear. This explains why you've never seen a competent presentation of public school test score data, whether in the domestic or the international arena.

It explains why you never see the data concerning our country's astonishing per person health care spending. It explains why Drum's discussions of lead exposure couldn't find their way into the national discourse surrounding events in Flint.

It explains why you'll never read a real discussion of the press corps' conduct in Campaign 2000. It explain why Rachel Maddow took a dive on one key topic after another during the campaign which sent Donald J. Trump to the White House.

(This dates to the fall of 2012, when Maddow took a dive on Benghazi. For years later, the Maddow Show applauded Comey when he savaged Candidate Clinton in July 2016! Maddow ducked the emails for two solid years.)

How many times did Krugman explain that Paul Ryan is "The Flimflam Man?" For the first such column, just click here. He followed up many times.

But good grief! Even writing from the nation's highest platform, Krugman couldn't get other liberal pundits to follow him down that disallowed path. In a similar vein, consider today's puzzling column by Jon Meacham, which we'll likely discuss later on this week.

(Why was Bush the admirable upstanding guy? Why wasn't it Dukakis?)

Similarly, Comey was a "made man" among Washington insiders. This explains why the Maddow Show, along with everyone else, refused to take him on.

(Remember when she interviewed Colin Powell and forgot to ask him about his U.N. presentation regarding Iraq? Same basic idea!)

"It's not at all that I dislike Mr. Trump," Maddow said in June 2015, in the fourth year of Trump's reign as king of the nation's birthers. "It's not qualitative at all." Later, she tried to sell us on the greatness of her drinking buddy, "the great Greta can Susteren," queen of Trump's Fox News enablers during those grotesque, hideous years.

These are the kinds of plays our corporate hustlers make. This explains why you've never seen a serious analysis of the long years of gong-show work by such influential press corps figures as Chris Matthews and Maureen Dowd. There's nothing such players can say or do will will ever get discussed.

However counterintuitive they may be, these patterns of conduct are very real. And make no mistake:

Unlike every other corporate or professional guild, the mainstream press corps is in position to control what gets said about itself. For this reason, we should have accepted a basic fact a long time ago:

Criticism of the mainstream press is fundamentally pointless. The guild is going to type what it will—after which, the Jeffrey Toobins will go on TV to offer their fake mea culpas.

It was on this basis that we said, at the start of the year, that "it's all anthropology now." Various guilds are going to tell us the stories they like. Nothing will ever change that.

All that remains is a study of the reasons why our various guilds and tribes choose to toy with basic facts in the ways they do. What makes us flounder and flail in the particular ways we do? It's all anthropology now!

By the middle of the year, we were adding a second question: Why have we received so little help from the nation's many logicians?

Campaign 2000 turned on the logic of paraphrase. No one stepped forward to comment.

Before that, the endless Gingrich-Clinton Medicare debate was a fully semantic pseudo-discussion. That fell in the province of the logicians. No one emitted a sound.

Nothing is going to stop our descent toward Mister Trump's War, which may take various forms in the months and years ahead. For ourselves, as we wait for the shoes to drop—for Adam Schiff's subpoenas to be ignored; for Supreme Court rulings to be ignored; for elections to be postponed or cancelled—we're going to return to a question we were asking this fall:

Where the Sam Hill are the nation's logicians? Where have these people been?

What have the logicians been? In an unintentionally comical effort, "Best Book of the Year" author Jim Holt gave us part of the answer in a new collection of essays this year. In the middle of the last century, "the greatest logician since Aristotle" was trying to explain the logic of 2 + 2 = 4!

Then, along came the later Wittgenstein. Tomorrow, we'll start turning our lonely eyes back towards him.

How do we know that 2 + 2 = 4? All across our universities, the logicians and the philosophers are diddling with such manifest nonsense.

Where have the logicians been? Tomorrow, we'll return to that topic. We'll be working in the garden, as Luther is said to have said!

For today, we recommend Charles Blow's new column, in which he lists the kinds of disasters which may be headed our way in the next two years.

We had no idea it could get this bad—and at the time, it had already gotten so bad that we decided to start this site. It's all the absence of logic now! We'll return to this topic tomorrow.

Full disclosure: We're aware of two serious critiques of Maureen Dowd's influential work.

In 1992, Katherine Boo really did play the Cassandra role in her prescient Washington Monthly essay, "Creeping Dowdism."

Before too long, Boo found her way out of daily journalism. She now writes serious books, the kind that everyone gives awards and no one reads or discusses.

Sixteen years later, Clark Hoyt savaged Dowd for her endless gender-crazy attacks on Candidate Hillary Clinton. Referring to an article about sexist political coverage, Hoyt offered this about Dowd:
HOYT (6/22/08): I think a fair reading suggests that The Times did a reasonably good job in its news articles. But Dowd's columns about Clinton's campaign were so loaded with language painting her as a 50-foot woman with a suffocating embrace, a conniving film noir dame and a victim dependent on her husband that they could easily have been listed in that Times article on sexism, right along with the comments of Chris Matthews, Mike Barnicle, Tucker Carlson or, for that matter, [William] Kristol, who made the Hall of Shame for a comment on Fox News, not for his Times work.
There was more, but you get the idea. For ourselves, we think Clinton was a fairly lousy candidate in the last campaign. But twenty-four years of crackpot garbage from people like Dowd explains why Trump's in the White House.

Writing at the end of a long, distinguished career, Hoyt was serving as the New York Times' public editor when he wrote his piece about Dowd. You saw no follow-up discussion anywhere else.

Dearest darlings, it just isn't done—and it never will be. It's all anthropology now—plus the absence of logic.

20 comments:

  1. Maybe the most ironic thing is that Bob's thesis is demonstrated maybe most completely by the fact that his critiques have failed to gain any traction over the past 20 years. Some day someone is going to look at Bob's work as vitally important, but for now unfortunately he's not recognized as the prophet he is.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Television ruined us.

      Delete
    2. HOW I GOT CURE TO MY HERPES WITH THE HELP OF DR EBAKO NATURAL HERBS CURE WHATSAPP HIM ON +1 (213) 861-9461


      I can’t believe this. A great testimony that i must share to all HERPES patient in the world i never believed that their could be any complete cure for HERPES or any cure for HERPES,i saw people’s testimony on sites of how DR EBAKO prepare herbal cure and brought them back to life again. i had to try it too and you can,t believe that in just few weeks i started using it all my pains stop gradually and i had to leave without the HERPES DRUGS the doctor gave to me. Right now i can tell you that few months now i have not had any pain,delay in treatment leads to death. Here is his email: doctorebakospellhome@gmail.com his WHATSAPP number is +1 (213) 861-9461
      https://drebakocurehome.blogspot.com/
      http://drebakocurehome.over-blog.com
      he can also cure you from
      HPV
      HIV
      HIV2
      Hepatitis B
      Diabetes
      etc





































































      HOW I GOT CURE TO MY HERPES WITH THE HELP OF DR EBAKO NATURAL HERBS CURE WHATSAPP HIM ON +1 (213) 861-9461


      I can’t believe this. A great testimony that i must share to all HERPES patient in the world i never believed that their could be any complete cure for HERPES or any cure for HERPES,i saw people’s testimony on sites of how DR EBAKO prepare herbal cure and brought them back to life again. i had to try it too and you can,t believe that in just few weeks i started using it all my pains stop gradually and i had to leave without the HERPES DRUGS the doctor gave to me. Right now i can tell you that few months now i have not had any pain,delay in treatment leads to death. Here is his email: doctorebakospellhome@gmail.com his WHATSAPP number is +1 (213) 861-9461
      https://drebakocurehome.blogspot.com/
      http://drebakocurehome.over-blog.com
      he can also cure you from
      HPV
      HIV
      HIV2
      Hepatitis B
      Diabetes
      etc

      Delete
  2. Why so many words, Bob? Society's priesthood (aka the establishment media) works for the ruling class, advances the dominant ideology. That's a trivial observation.

    But that's not why Donald The Spectacular was elected. He was elected despite that. It's perfectly obvious, dear Bob.

    In the fall of 2016 the ruling class wanted the old psycho-witch to become the queen for the next 8 years. And the priesthood (aka the establishment media) was working hard to achieve that goal. Yes, that's right, dear Bob.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. 12;47,
      Nothing about unicorns, Mr. Fabulist?
      The Russians need to start paying for a better quality troll. They're getting ripped-off by your laziness.

      Delete
    2. Shouldn't you be working, right about now, dembot, on whipping up outrage against the nativity scene being installed too close to a townhall somewhere?

      Don't get distracted, dear. Concentrate.

      Delete
  3. Why was Blow's asinine column recommended? I had to double check that column date wasn't 2017 since every assertion by Blow has been disproven for a year or more.

    ReplyDelete
  4. When was the last time Krugman mentioned Bob Somerby?

    ReplyDelete
  5. A blistering take down of Maureen Dowd:

    http://www.lawyersgunsmoneyblog.com/2018/12/cant-expect-someone-responsible-many-800-words-week-come-new-ideas

    These guys and gals continue to blast mainstream press idiots like Dowd and David Brooks.

    Mainstream press criticism is alive and well. One just has to look around a bit to see it.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. That is blistering criticism? I see it as a 125 word, half ass blog post that couldn't have taken over 2 minutes to shit out. It's better than nothing I guess.

      Delete
  6. Conservatives have been complaining about media "narrative" for a long time. Although Bob correctly points out a few cases where the media narrative was to criticize some Democrat or to ignore some liberal issue, the overwhelming number of narratives opposed conservatives and their positions. The liberal media got exposed using JournoList to coordinate their reporting. Wiki says
    JournoList (sometimes referred to as the J-List)[1] was a private Google Groups forum for discussing politics and the news media with 400 "left-leaning"[2] journalists, academics and others. Ezra Klein created the online forum in February 2007 while blogging at The American Prospect and shut it down on June 25, 2010 amid wider public exposure. Journalists later pointed out various off-color statements made by members of the list denigrating conservatives, as well as a seeming conspiracy to prop up then Presidential candidate Barack Obama....

    Tucker Carlson, who edited several of Strong's articles about JournoList, wrote in a July 22 article: "Again and again, we discovered members of Journolist working to coordinate talking points on behalf of Democratic politicians, principally Barack Obama. That is not journalism, and those who engage in it are not journalists. They should stop pretending to be. The news organizations they work for should stop pretending, too. ... I've been in journalism my entire adult life, and have often defended it against fellow conservatives who claim the news business is fundamentally corrupt. It's harder to make that defense now. It will be easier when honest (and, yes, liberal) journalists denounce what happened on Journolist as wrong."[15] Fred Barnes, executive editor of The Weekly Standard, discussed JournoList saying, "... hundreds of journalists have gotten together, on an online listserv called JournoList, to promote liberalism and liberal politicians at the expense of traditional journalism.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Is this the same Tucker Carlson who is trying to foment a race war from his paid sinecure at Fox?

      Delete
  7. Once again I issue my PSA that DAinCA is a moral and intellectual idiot. You may safely ignore anything he writes as it's always just a parroting of right-wing talking points. JournoList was a Google Groups hangout run by Ezra Klein for left-leaning journalists, bloggers, academics, and fellow-travelers. Klein, now an editor at Vox, has worked for WaPo, Bloomberg News, and MSNBC. There's no evidence that this liberal group ever coordinated anything, and it's no surprise given the membership requirements of the forum that the members had the same political views.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Dembot jumps to defense of the priests of his zombie cult. Presented with evidence, dembot demands the evidence. How cute.

      Delete
    2. deadrat - The evidence for collusion is that

      1. they not only presented the same views, but they presented the same views at the same time.

      2. The fact that they kept it secret.

      3. They disbanded JournoList once it became public.

      Points #2 and #3 show that they knew that what they were doing was wrong. A mere "hangout" would not have been wrong.

      Delete
    3. This is a dual Public Service Announcement.

      1. DAinCA is a moral and intellectual idiot. Everything he posts is without factual basis. Just about everything he posts are copy-and-pasted rightwing talking points. If you want to find out about JournoList, look it up for yourself. You can easily find the names of the 150 or so participants. It will take more work to determine which ones were working journalists, compare their writings, and figure out if they were working in lockstep. Before you get far, you’ll probably figure out that this isn’t your burden, but DAinCA’s, something he won’t or can’t shoulder because, well, re-read the first sentence.

      2. MaoinCal is trolling you. Stop responding. Do you think there’s a point to be made by responding, “I’m not a Dembot in a zombie cult”? And why would you respond to someone who thinks that anything DAinCA posts is “evidence”? Treat Mao like the spammers here who tout spells and potions.

      Delete
  8. Welcome to VIP Doha Escorts which offering Escorts Service in Doha. In this way, our office Doha Escorts is outstanding amongst other answers for each of the person who is looking a pleasurable fun at Doha.

    ReplyDelete
  9. heal from broken heart" Love spell from dr.Unity brought my husband back"contact Unityspelltemple@gmail.com to help you get your Ex lover back urgently after breakup/divorce"
    After 12years of marriage, me and my husband has been into one quarrel or the other until he finally left me and moved to California to be with another woman. I felt my life was over and my kids thought they would never see their father again. i tried to be strong just for the kids but i could not control the pains that torments my heart, my heart was filled with sorrows and pains because i was really in love with my husband. Every day and night i think of him and always wish he could come back to me, I was really worried and i needed help, so i searched for help online and I came across a website that suggested that Dr Unity can help get ex back fast. So, I felt I should give him a try. I contacted him and he told me what to do and i did it then he did a Love spell for me. 28 hours later, my husband really called me and told me that he miss me and the kids so much, So Amazing!! So that was how he came back that same day,with lots of love and joy,and he apologized for his mistake,and for the pain he caused me and the kids. Then from that day,our Marriage was now stronger than how it were before, All thanks to Dr Unity. he is so powerful and i decided to share my story on the internet that Dr.Unity is real spell caster who i will always pray to live long to help his children in the time of trouble, if you are here and you need your ex lover back or save your marriage fast. Do not cry anymore, contact this powerful spell caster Dr.Unity now. Here’s his contact: Call/WhatsApp him: +2348071622464 ,Email him at: Unityspelltemple@gmail.com , Website:https://unityspellstemple.blogspot.com ,Your kindness will never be forgotten.

    ReplyDelete
  10. HOW I GOT CURE TO MY HERPES WITH THE HELP OF DR EBAKO NATURAL HERBS CURE WHATSAPP HIM ON +1 (213) 861-9461


    I can’t believe this. A great testimony that i must share to all HERPES patient in the world i never believed that their could be any complete cure for HERPES or any cure for HERPES,i saw people’s testimony on sites of how DR EBAKO prepare herbal cure and brought them back to life again. i had to try it too and you can,t believe that in just few weeks i started using it all my pains stop gradually and i had to leave without the HERPES DRUGS the doctor gave to me. Right now i can tell you that few months now i have not had any pain,delay in treatment leads to death. Here is his email: doctorebakospellhome@gmail.com his WHATSAPP number is +1 (213) 861-9461
    https://drebakocurehome.blogspot.com/
    http://drebakocurehome.over-blog.com
    he can also cure you from
    HPV
    HIV
    HIV2
    Hepatitis B
    Diabetes
    etc

    ReplyDelete