SATURDAY, OCTOBER 14, 2023
We humans attempt to reason: In our view, college football is always better when Stanford is good.
Stanford was quite good in the recent past. It may be hard to recall at this point, but the Cardinal finished fourth in the nation in the A.P. poll after the 2010 season.
To review recent seasons, click here.
Jim Harbaugh was head coach at the time. The next year, David Shaw took over. Under Shaw, the Cardinal finished seventh in the nation in 2011 and 2012, third in the nation in 2015, twelfth in 2016.
Third in the nation in 2015! Things have gone downhill from there. Then too, there's the current New York Times column by Pamela Paul, entitled The War Comes to Stanford.
Part of the column involves the recent conduct of a Stanford instructor in a mandated freshman course, College 101. And yes, that's the actual name of the course! For proof of this matter, click here.
What happened in College 101 this week? For CNN's account of the matter, you can just click this.
At issue is the proven ability of us the humans to display limited judgment. That said, there isn't a final, objective way to prove that this instructor's judgment was wrong.
Presumably, most people in this country would agree that the instructor's judgment was faulty. Indeed, we would agree that his judgment was faulty. That doesn't necessarily mean that it was, but it may help explain why so many voters are "still with Trump."
The woods are lovely, dark and deep. Given the way our brains are wired, we humans see through a glass very darkly.
At times like these, we tend to seek formulations which suggest that our preferred judgments are plainly correct, full stop. It frequently isn't as simple as that. As rational assessment collapses around us, we'll try to discuss this next week.
We love college football when Stanford is good! Elsewhere on the Stanford campus, and even at the New York Times, the challenges have been coming thick and fast this week.
College football is fairly easy. Especially at times like these, rational assessment is heart-breaking, tragic, quite hard.
"Especially at times like these, rational assessment is heart-breaking, tragic, quite hard."
ReplyDeleteDon't worry about this 'assessment' nonsense, Bob.
Just follow the Party Line. Our Party, and Our Forever Young Leader can't be wrong.
And The Science - let's not forget The Science! The Party and The President will inform you of the latest Scientific Truths.
I am Corby, and I support this message.
DeleteHamilton Nolan says wisdom means listening to the angry youth.
ReplyDeletehttps://www.hamiltonnolan.com/p/young-morality-and-old-morality
Football is stupid. I am not Corby.
ReplyDeleteWell, yeah.
DeleteScott Adams asserts that calling a white person a "colonizer" is comparable to calling a black person the N-word. Adams asserts that the epithet "colonizer" is a call to violence. YMMV
ReplyDeleteThere are no colonizers of North America centuries ago who are living today.
Delete@3:55 PM
DeleteYes, I agree. The statute of limitations has expired; Americans are not colonizers now.
But what about those Europeans who can be reasonably categorized as colonizers today? Europeans who move to far-away foreign lands, use arms to take control, subjugate the locals, or kick them out.
Name one.
Delete'Colonizer' v. the 'N-Word'
DeleteIt's not an apt comparison since one refers to actual actions taken in the past, whereas the other is an opinion about a group based on skin pigment.
And saying 'colonizer' is a call to violence sounds more like how Adams wants the world to be, rather than how it is.
Even if you thought we were still colonizers by nature and usurpers, how do you justify the murder of civilians going about their business?
DeleteHow do you reconcile taking grandmothers and little ones hostage? How would you feel different from your enemy after doing that?
Undocumented immigrants are colonizers.
DeleteNo, they (and the rest of us) are the puppets of people who stage manage desperation for their own purposes.
DeleteI am not a puppet. I am Corby.
DeleteWe are not "colonizers by nature and usurpers". We are what our circumstances make us.
DeleteAs one famous man famously said: “It is not the consciousness of men that determines their being, but, on the contrary, their social being that determines their consciousness.”
I am unconscious.
Delete"how do you justify the murder of civilians going about their business?"
DeleteYou live with the 2nd Amendment you have. Not the 2nd Amendment you wish you had.
Anonymouse 6:10am, you do an injustice to anyone dead or alive who suffered actual colonization.
DeleteAnonymous 8:58am, the 2nd Amendmrnt doesn’t justify murder, it enshrines the right of self-protection from such a fate.
DeleteThe 2nd amendment says nothing about self-protection from murder. It postulates a right to bear arms based on the need for a well-regulated militia.
Deletehttps://constitution.congress.gov/constitution/amendment-2/
SCOTUS concluded that the Founders had no impulse to take guns from citizens. They were used for hunting and for self protection against predators, both animal and human.
DeleteThey still are and are regulated.
My condolences.
The Founders didn’t want the newly constituted federal government to disband state militias, which might be needed during servile insurrections.
DeleteWe still have those.
DeleteWhat they didn't want, the founders, is a standing army. They wanted the citizens to be ready to defend their country if necessary. To mobilize and fight, at short notice.
DeleteSomething like what Switzerland has been doing.
Please, Cecelia. Don't pretend a room full of dead 6 year olds, isn't the price we pay for freedom.
DeleteBoys had gun racks in their Jeeps and their pickup trucks when I was going to school.
DeleteThere were no school shootings
They are the price we pay for humanism.
The Founders were humanists.
DeleteI'm not very religious, but I'll still pray to God that someday Cecelia accepts Bob's advice, and listens to "the Others".
DeleteBTW a course like College 101 sounds pretty reasonable to me. It's not that clear to me what someone should out of college other than a diploma. It seems reasonable to tell students how they can best take advantage of a 'Stanford education.
ReplyDeleteDid you read about the top high school student who was hired by Google in a position that would normally go to a college graduate? I wonder whether this young man will miss having had the benefit of a college education.
See Bay Area high school grad rejected by 16 colleges reveals how he got Google jobhttps://abc7news.com/high-school-grad-rejected-by-colleges-stanley-zhong-schooler-lands-google-job-bay-area/13909470/
You can go back to school at any age.
DeleteAnd David should.
DeleteThere is no such person as Corby and there never was.
ReplyDelete‘Corby’ is an impossible name.
DeleteAnonymouse 11:03pm, there’s no such person named anonymous either.
DeleteI am Corby, but my real name is Anonymouse.
DeleteAnonymouse 6:56am, your parents were eerily prescient.
DeleteI’m not Corby, and my parents were prescient too, but not eerily so.
DeleteWho was that masked man, pa?
DeleteThey call him Corby, son.
Third liaison:
ReplyDeleteFanny van der Faart, civilian.
Recommend for recruitment.
She sounds interesting. Recruit her.
DeleteYes her profile is impressive. I agree. Recruit her.
DeleteIn other news, obstetrics departments are closing:
ReplyDeletehttps://www.nbcnews.com/health/womens-health/3-hospitals-closing-maternity-labor-delivery-units-alabama-rcna111374
Cruelty IS the point of Right-wing ideology.
DeleteLeft-wing politician create programs that have failed in the past. Naturally they fail again. Why do they enact these doomed programs?
DeleteFar and away the most reviled left wing program- the one that was for years consistently the centerpiece of republican denigration- is no longer a campaign talking point, because as promised, Trump replaced it with something better. Rest in Peace, the failed leftist program so named to shame Its author for posterity: Obamacare. What, I stand corrected? On how many counts? OK, no Trump plan. In fact no longer any republican mention or push back against this widely unpopular plan. What??? It's not widely unpopular? Well, ok, unpopular in conservative states, largest among these being Florida and Texas. What?? Florida and Texas were the two states with the highest marketplace enrollment in 2023, by wide margins? Look, please don't quibble with me about stuff like facts. I am entitled to my opinions.
Delete12:37/dumb drunk: Base rate fallacy
Delete8:34 Obamacare enrollment 2023:
DeleteCalifornia 1,739,368
Florida 3,225,436
Texas 2,410,810
New York 241,052
So by wide margins you mean a quarter of a percent? (adjusted for population) Fucking moron.
DeleteEnrollment per million residents:
ReplyDeleteCalifornia: 44,599
Texas: 80,360
Florida: 146,610
New York: 12,686
Have mommy check your math before handing it in.