MADNESS: Greg Gutfeld was thrilled when a lie was debunked!

 SATURDAY, MARCH 8, 2025

Obama's pink underwear: The angriest "cable news" star of them all was thrilled with one part of Tuesday night's address.

The following night, at 10:16 Eastern, the angriest child shared his thoughts with his hand-picked panel of dimwitted guests. Here's what the thrilled child said:

GUTFELD (3/5/25): One of the best things that he said last night, and I love it, when he said that kids identifying as trans is a big lie. Do you know how long I have waited for somebody to say that? That we know it is a big lie, and now you can say that?

For the record, this angriest child is now 60 years old! Even now, he explicitly refers to climate change as a "hoax."

At any rate, that's what the angry host said. In fairness, he was presenting a perfectly reasonable paraphrase of what the president actually said. This was the relevant passage from the commander's address:

PRESIDENT TRUMP (3/4/25): ...Shortly after taking office, I signed an executive order banning public schools from indoctrinating our children with transgender ideology. I also signed an order to cut off all taxpayer funding to any institution that engages in the sexual mutilation of our youth. 

And now, I want Congress to pass a bill permanently banning and criminalizing sex changes on children and forever ending the lie that any child is trapped in the wrong body. This is a big lie. And our message to every child in America is that you are perfect exactly the way God made you.

That's what the commander said. For the record, he may have a limited idea of what is involved in any account of "the way God made" some particular child.

At any rate, that's what he said. The following night, an angry lad from a sunny land announced that he was thrilled with what the commander had said. 

On the basis of eruptions like this, we've accurately said that the Fox News Channel's Gutfeld! program isn't a comedy show. We've also said that it isn't even a "cable news" show. 

Most accurately, Gutfeld! is a propaganda program hiding behind comedy elements. It's presided over by a weirdly angry dysfunctional man who is supported, on a nightly basis, by a constantly changing four-member panel of ideological tools.

It's hard to know what the president or the angry child meant by the claim concerning what they called a "big lie." As far as we know, there is a long global history of the phenomenon under review. The leading authority on the topic offers this brief thumbnail from a much longer set of reports:

Transgender history

Accounts of transgender people (including non-binary and third gender people) have been uncertainly identified going back to ancient times in cultures worldwide. The modern terms and meanings of transgender, gender, gender identity, and gender role only emerged in the 1950s and 1960s. As a result, opinions vary on how to categorize historical accounts of gender-variant people and identities.

The galli eunuch priests of classical antiquity have been interpreted by some scholars as transgender or third-gender. The trans-feminine kathoey and hijra gender roles have persisted for thousands of years in Thailand and the Indian subcontinent, respectively. In Arabia, khanith (like earlier mukhannathun) have occupied a third gender role attested since the 7th century CE. Traditional roles for transgender women and transgender men have existed in many African societies, with some persisting to the modern day. North American Indigenous fluid and third gender roles, including the Navajo nádleehi and the Zuni lhamana, have existed since pre-colonial times.

[...] 

Transgender American men and women are documented in accounts from throughout the 19th century. The first known informal transgender advocacy organization in the United States, Cercle Hermaphroditos, was founded in 1895.

And so on, and on and on. Lucky for us, an angry child has now come along to help us see how widespread the historical lying has been!

This is a complicated topic. Anthropologically, many members of our species are disinclined to come to terms with the planet's endless array of complications.

The greatest anthropologist of the last century offered an account of such people. He offered this account of the way we humans may sometimes behave in the face of unwanted complexity and complication:

Where I come from, we only talk so long. After that, we start to hit.

The comment was recorded in a book the New York Times selected as one of the past century's hundred greatest (Ball Four, Jim Bouton). On the Gutfeld! program, the world is given a chance to see this synopsis validated on a nightly basis.

Below, we'll show you more of what was said in the Gutfeld! programs last week, with Barack Obama mocked as secretly being a woman and Michelle Obama mocked as secretly being a man. (That used to be Maureen Dowd's beat!) As this garbage emerges from the can every night, the New York Times averts its gaze—refuses to report this remarkable conduct. 

So too with the scholars at the Mediaite site. Quite literally, they never comment on what occurs on this heavily watched TV show. They routinely post about the little-watched CNN show which airs during the same 10 p.m. Eastern hour

On Wednesday evening's Gutfeld! show, millions of viewers were excitedly told that a long global history has all been a big lie. With that, we skip ahead to a news report in today's Washinton Post.

Here again, we'll show you something said by President Trump in Tuesday night's address. For now, the Post's news report concerns a thrilling new study which is reportedly being planned by the CDC:

CDC plans study on vaccines and autism despite research showing no link

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention is planning a study into the potential connections between vaccines and autism, according to two people familiar with the plan, despite overwhelming scientific evidence that there is no link between the two.

The request for the study came from Trump administration officials, said the two people familiar with the plan, who spoke on the condition of anonymity out of fear of retaliation. President Donald Trump and Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy have repeatedly linked vaccines to autism.

Kennedy, an anti-vaccine activist, has disparaged vaccines for years. A previous Washington Post examination found that since 2020, Kennedy has linked autism to vaccines in at least 36 appearances, despite the evidence to the contrary.

Trump, who mentioned the rising rates of autism in his address to Congress this week, also has linked vaccines to autism. In a 2012 call into “Fox & Friends,” he said “they go in, they get this monster shot—you ever see the size of it? It’s like they’re pumping in, you know it’s terrible, the amount, and they pump this into this little body, and then all of a sudden the child is different a month later. And I strongly believe that’s it.”

Hallelujah! There may soon be an important new study—an important new study of a matter which has already been studied to death.

Also, sure enough! As it was in 2012, so it was last Tuesday night! The commander did mention the rising rates of autism in his address to Congress. Specifically, here's what he said:

PRESIDENT TRUMP (3/4/25): Our goal is to get toxins out of our environment, poisons out of our food supply, and keep our children healthy and strong. As an example, not long ago—and you can’t even believe these numbers—one in 10,000 children had autism. One in 10,000, and now it’s one in 36. There’s something wrong. 

One in 36. Think of that! So, we’re going to find out what it is, and there’s nobody better than Bobby and all of the people that are working with you. You have the best to figure out what is going on. Okay, Bobby. Good luck. It’s a very important job. Thank you.

"You can’t even believe these numbers," the president said. 

That may be because one of the numbers he cited is almost surely wrong. Here are the numbers which appear in the Washington Post's news report about the exciting new study:

The number of autism cases is rising in the United States. About 1 in 36 children has received such a diagnosis, according to data the CDC collected from 11 states, compared with 1 in 150 children in 2000.

Researchers attribute much of the surge to increased awareness of the disorder and changes in how it is classified by medical professionals. But scientists say there are other factors, genetic and environmental, that could be playing roles too.

Years of research based on data from hundreds of thousands of patients has shown no link between vaccines and autism. A decade-long study of half a million children in Denmark published in 2019 showed the MMR vaccine does not increase the risk of autism, lending new statistical evidence to what was already medical consensus.

Public health and other experts have feared Kennedy would use his new authority to mislead the public on vaccines.

And so on from there—but sad! According to the CDC, it was actually "1 in 150 children" as of the year 2000. On Tuesday night, the commander rounded that figure off to the more enervating "one in ten thousand" figure.

So it goes and goes and goes as the commander misstates every possible statistic, possibly (or possibly not) in a ""pathological manner (whatever that might mean). On programs like the Gutfeld! show, storebought collections of stooges and hacks cheer the commander on.

Meanwhile, the "comedy elements" on the program are ugly and stupid and coarse. They're also impossibly vast. 

Many of these comedy elements revolve around the aging host's astounding obsession with human waste—but they also revolve around his endless obsession with matters of sexuality and gender.

Liberal women are all too fat. The women of the The View look like horses, cows, elephants. (They recently adopted "pig Latin" as their program's official language!)

Michelle Obama is really a man. Rep. Tlaib allegedly has way too much hair on her face. Nancy Pelosi is swimming in Botox. Rep. Nadler is the smelliest person in the entire Congress.

Then too, consider the way the angry fellow started the week. After attacks on the usual suspects, including the size of "Oprah's ass," he arrived at the observation recorded below.

This is what the broken toy said. It was still just 10:01 Eastern!

GUTFELD (3/3/25): A pair of JFK's underwear sold at an auction for $9000, beating the previous record of 45 hundred dollars for Barack Obama's underwear.

[PHOTO OF LACY, PINK CROTCHLESS WOMEN'S PANTIES]

GUTFELD: [Makes face

AUDIENCE: [Shouting, applause]

TYRUS: Whewww.

KENNEDY: They're dainty!

GUTFELD: They are dainty. And they ride up. Trust me!

We know—you think we're making that up. But so it goes on this astonishing, soul-crushing TV program. 

To fact-check us, you can click here. Regarding JFK's underwear, this nutcase was citing a report in the New York Post. His insanity took things from there.

This eunuch goes on and on in this way, might after night after night, as four stooges cheer him on. The former VJ known as Kennedy is especially withering, vile.

As the Gutfeld! program goes on and on, Blue America looks away. Also, the president vastly embellishes every statistic. To all intents and purposes, this other astonishing practice has been normalized.

The other Kennedy—Robert F. Kennedy Jr.—comes into play with respect to autism and vaccines. We suggest that you might want to pity the child—the child who saw his uncle murdered when he was 10 years old, then saw his father murdered less than five years later.

Though it may be hard to do in this case, we suggest that you pity the child! That said, does medical science have something to tell us about the way these people may end up behaving as adults? At the New York Times, and across the Blue American spectrum, the players who went to the finest schools have agreed that they must avert their gaze from this endless behavior.

Greg Gutfeld was thrilled this past Wednesday night with respect to a troubling lie. Some people aren't built for complication. In the face of such inconvenience, they simply find ways to hit.

Can medical science help us understand this perpetually angry segment of our species? The New York Times has reached an agreement:

They've agreed not to ask, not to tell.


45 comments:



  1. "It's presided over by a weirdly angry dysfunctional man who is supported, on a nightly basis, by a constantly changing four-member panel of ideological tools."

    Don't be envious and bitter, Bob. That's not how God made you.

    Although, who knows. There's a chance envious and bitter is exactly what God wanted you to be. Sadly.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Who's envious and bitter now, Kay?

      Delete
  2. What will the study demanded by RFK Jr do to public perceptions. There are so many reasons to not believe that vaccines cause autism and no reason at all to believe that there is a link. From a scientific POV this is a settled matter.

    Tragically many laypeople haven’t gotten the message. They don’t vaccinate their children because they believe there is a link or might be a link. Logically the study should be good for public perceptions, because it will again show no link. But people aren’t always logical. I’m afraid that the existence of the study will strengthen the false belief that there is a link.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. "tragically"??? Go take a flying fuck, Dickhead. You voted for this shitshow. Go fuck yourself.

      Delete

    2. It's obvious that injecting every child in the world with chemical substance will never harm a single child. In the world. Ever. Obviously.

      Delete
    3. I notice it hasn't created a Republican voter who isn't a bigot, obviously.

      Delete
    4. Exactly, let's stop even feeding children.

      That's it, we have had enough.

      We will stop putting things in our children, not even food.

      Except for Republicans, they like to put things in children.

      Trump, for example, raped that 13yo that reminded him of his own daughter.

      Delete
    5. "But people aren’t always logical."

      This is good self-knowledge.

      Delete
    6. The study will show a link, because RFK Jr will be running it.

      Delete
    7. Why does a myth persist? I recall that the original fake study claimed to show that thimiserol, a preservative used in vaccines, caused autism. The person who did the study went to jail because of fraud. And thimiserol is no longer used in most vaccines. Yet the myth persists.

      Delete
    8. Fuck you, Dickhead in Cal. It's only money and time. We're all rolling downhill together, you motherfucking fascist prick. He's recommending castor oil for the measles outbreak, you horse's ass.

      Delete
    9. I've got an idea: why don't we waste taxpayers dollars on a study that is redundant to established science?

      Delete
  3. Surely, pitying Gutfeld will solve things. Surely.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Fox News' antics are routinely covered in media, mostly by independent media that garners significantly more viewership than corporate media.

    Somerby's ignorance of this easily discernible circumstance nullifies his feckless daily rants.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Data indicates that a majority of voters that closely or even moderately follow news media, voted for Harris.

      Corporate media is garbage, it enjoys an outsized influence among politicians and pundits, but it has little significant influence over the electorate, and is not significantly determinative in elections.

      Somerby's theses related to media and discourse and electoral politics are unsupported by the evidence, and are therefore irrelevant.

      We all desire to be relevant in some way, but it can drive some into poor thinking, and worse, it can engender emotional discomforts like anger, bitterness, and hate.

      Sure, let's offer pity to the irrelevant, it may soothe their fragile sensitivities - anything is possible. More likely, it will worsen those negative traits.

      Delete
  5. Somerby recognizes that Gutfeld is bad for branding for Somerby's preferred right wing worldviews.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. This is accurate, but only in a limited sense.

      Gutfeld is of no real consequence, Dems are neither negatively nor positively affected by Gutfeld.

      Somerby wants Dems to be upset at Gutfeld because he thinks it bolsters his stance that distasteful rhetoric like Gutfeld's - and Somerby wants to connect Gutfeld to his misperception that Dems engage in similar insults - has some impact on politics.

      It does not, Gutfeld is of no consequence.

      Delete
  6. Republicans are hell bent on destroying our country to benefit a handful of billionaires.

    Yet Somerby keeps whistling his same dumb right wing tune, without a sincere, coherent, or genuine care in the world.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. anon, yes that right wing tune that Trump (and Gutfield and Musk) are clinically mentally ill. How did you ever get to be so stupid?

      Delete
    2. 11:43 is likely not as "stupid" as you, acma, since you seem to have been duped, whereas 11:43 is on the nose - so much so, that you felt compelled to respond, exposing yourself as a dope/troll.

      Delete
    3. Somerby's laser focus on how to properly term Trump/Musk's mental impairments is a distraction from the more significant issue of their corruption and criminality.

      This effort works towards his greater goal of normalizing capitulating to right wingers.

      Delete
    4. I love this theory:
      Somerby characterizes Red leaders as clinically disordered, which (believe it or not) proves he is a Red Team shill. See, this criticism is simply a stratagem to distract from what the author of the comment thinks Somerby should be saying.

      Delete
    5. What I can net understand: How is Somerby’s suggestion that Trump may be clinically disordered lead gullible liberals to support them?

      Delete
    6. (Clicked without proofreading)

      How does Somerby’s suggestion that Trump may be clinically disordered persuade gullible liberals to support Trump?

      Delete
    7. This piece does not suggest that Trump’s possible clinical disorder leads liberals to support him. It does not discuss liberals supporting Trump at all. It's about right-wing media enabling Trump’s misinformation.

      Delete
  7. No transgender person has transitioned as much as our Republican leaders; they have juiced themselves with hair implants, penile implants, lifts in shoes, fake teeth, tan spray, caked on makeup, growth hormones, other hormones, various drugs, steroids, etc.

    The big lie is that Republican men embody masculinity, when in reality, they are more like drag queens.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Except drag queens have consensual sexual relations. That's a big difference between them and Republican leaders.

      Delete
    2. Outwardly, Trump is a vile, physically repulsive, and ignorant man, but inside he feels like a handsome and fit genius.

      Who are we to judge? If Trump wants to alter himself to be more aligned with his internal view of himself, more power to him. Sure, he is failing, looking and sounding more like a clown, but he is free to try.

      Republican women used to pride themselves on their simple and plain appearance, but now they all look like flashy drag queens with laminated faces and exaggerated features with enhanced lips and boobs and reshaped waists and rear ends.

      Whatever floats your boat.

      Delete
  8. Few things are as harmful to children as religious indoctrination.

    It warps their minds, often for life. It is a form of child abuse.

    If Republicans actually cared about children, they would protect them from abuse, instead of engaging in widespread child abuse.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Somerby's buyer's remorse over Trump is...DELIGHTFUL!

    ReplyDelete
  10. Ugh. This reader's remorse is eating away at my stomach.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Governor Newsom has introduced legislation to ban hair implants and it make it a felony to identify as "haired" when you are in fact bald.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. A more accurate analogy would be:

      Newsom spoke against people with hair implants competing in hair competition against people without hair implants.

      Delete
  12. Elon Musk defrauds Tesla dealers:

    https://www.eschatonblog.com/2025/03/his-whole-career.html

    ReplyDelete
  13. A West Virginia woman who voted for Trump has lost her civil service job, so she doesn’t like him any more. She still thinks he’s doing some wonderful (unspecified) things for our country, though.

    https://www.reuters.com/world/us/doge-job-cuts-shake-trump-voting-west-virginia-town-2025-03-07/

    ReplyDelete
  14. "As the Gutfeld! program goes on and on, Blue America looks away."

    This is a favorite refrain from Our Host. "Blue America" looks away, averts its gaze, sits on its hands. What, exactly, is the preferred response to Gutfeld's silly presentations?

    Are we to tune in every night so we can speak forcefully about the awfulness of his show? That would raise his viewership and consequently raise his rates to advertisers, rewarding his behavior. Are we to demand that our leading Blue America news outlets do that job for us? Gutfeld already spends much of his time attacking Blue America media. Responding in kind would escalate a media food fight that wouldn't benefit anyone.

    So what is the best way to respond? As parents, many of us learned that the best way to react when little Skip learns a new shocking word is--do nothing. Don't even react. If the attempt to shock yields no result, the behavior isn't reinforced.

    Granted, it's not an ideal solution, but what's better?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Somerby is not advocating for a direct response to Gutfeld. He appears to simply want liberal media and political thinkers to recognize its impact and ability to shape narratives instead of pretending it doesn't exist.

      Delete
    2. Forget Trump’s destruction of government or his corruption or his abandoning of our allies…“Biden is a poopy pants” and “Jill Biden has sex with Hunter” are definitely worth the attention of liberal thinkers.

      Delete
    3. If one sees the matter as a choice between Gutfeld’s show and Trump‘s corruption, and if they feel Somerby is suggesting the show is a more important issue than the corruption, I could see where it would make them sarcastic and dismissive.

      Delete
    4. Jon Stewart used to dunk regularly on Glenn Beck and Fox. He had a particular knack for making them laughingstocks of hypocrisy. It was on point, funny, and annoyed the crap out of them. Treating them with the derisiveness they deserve is the answer. Bill Burr has lately been treating Musk this way.

      Delete
    5. No one was making an argument about comedians,

      Delete
    6. 9:37 makes a good point. Let's make room in our hearts to mock both Gutfeld and Trump.

      Delete
  15. No one cares about the feelings of Republican voters.

    ReplyDelete