TUESDAY, JUNE 17, 2025
We'd call it a dangerous time: On the one hand, it could look like a piece of encouraging news. At Mediaite, Joe DePaulo reports that President Trump's budget bill seems to be polling poorly. We've edited the headline:
Trump’s Budget Bill [Performing Poorly] in Two New Polls
The “Big, Beautiful” budget bill backed by President Donald Trump is a polling loser, two new surveys show.
A poll published by the Washington Post Tuesday shows just 23 percent of Americans support the legislation, while 42 percent oppose it. The good news from the poll for Trump—if there is any—is that a large segment of the populous is still on the fence, as 34 percent say they have no opinion about the bill.
But a poll from KFF (formerly known as the Kaiser Family Foundation) shows views about the bill are more entrenched. The KFF poll shows 64 percent hold unfavorable views on the bill, while 35 percent have a favorable opinion.
[...]
Though the Post poll found some voters could be convinced, the bad news for President Trump is that the more people learn about the bill, the less they like it. Among those who say they have heard a “great deal or a good amount” about the bill, 64 percent oppose it, while 33 percent support it.
In the one survey, 34 percent of respondents said they have no opinion on the bill. In the other survey, just one percent of respondents seem to be on the fence.
So it can sometimes go with polling! Meanwhile, consider this:
Within the internals of the Post survey, 66 percent of respondents say they have heard "a little" or "nothing at all" about the budget bill. In part, that's because of the endless stream of distractions with which the Trump administration is sometimes said to be "flooding the zone."
(Forty percent of respondents said they've heard only "a little" about the bill. An additional 26 percent said they've heard "nothing at all.")
The budget bill seems to be polling poorly. In a separate survey, the emerging Trump stance on military action against Iran also seems to be polling poorly:
Whopping Majority of Americans Oppose US Military Involvement in Conflict Between Israel and Iran
[,,,]
A new Economist/YouGov poll this week shows that Americans are not too excited about the US getting involved in Israel and Iran’s fighting.
According to the results, just 16% back US involvement while 60% say the US should not be involved. Another 24% said they were unsure.
The numbers in this pair of surveys may point to a dangerous time. We can imagine the president becoming even more erratic, possibly even more aggressive, if his basic polling profile seems to be in steep decline.
That said, his recent posts about Iran seem to have rocketed off in the direction of open military involvement. Last evening, he posted this strange recommendation:
Everyone should immediately evacuate Tehran!
For the record, Tehran's population is roughly nine million. It would be hard to get everyone out.
Today, in a trio of subsequent posts, President Trump seems to be announcing unequivocal U.S. ownership of the military actions against Iran. That includes veiled threats about possible plans to "take out (kill!)" that nation's "so-called Supreme Leader."
"Our patience is wearing thin," one new post says. "Thank you for your attention to this matter."
Full disclosure! Some people would support overt American attacks against Iran. Other people would not.
There's also the question of the possible erratic behavior of this particular president. With that in mind, Jon Stewart has finally asked the relevant question:
What the f*ck is wrong with that guy?
Stewart posed the question last night—except he was talking about Mike Lee! Then too, there's the basic matter of tone.
Could something be wrong with President Trump? We've been posing that question for a long time now. Something almost surely was wrong with President Biden. Is it possible that something—presumably, something different—could be wrong with President Trump?
Tragically, we regard that as a basic question. That said:
Within the realm of possible political discourse, it almost surely helps if you can ask that question with an empathetic tone, as opposed to throwing it out as an insult. (Presumably, it helps even more if you can actually mean it when you adopt that tone.)
Is something wrong with President Trump? If so, a time of declining political standing could imaginably be an increasingly dangerous time—or possibly not, of course.
Colby Hall has reported those latest aggressive posts. You can peruse them here.
ReplyDelete"We've been posing that question for a long time now. Something almost surely was wrong with President Biden. Is it possible that something—presumably, something different—could be wrong with President Trump?"
Not a psychiatrist, but the way it sounds, something might be seriously wrong with you, Bob.
"Is something wrong with President Trump?"
This is your TDS talking, Bob. Sadly, you've had it for almost a decade now. Notice my empathetic tone, please. Do you like it?
Something wrong as in his behavior, making grandiose threats that don't make sense about a war that a majority has said they don't want. Is that just Trump playing 10-D chess?
DeleteAnyone with the proper amount of TDS cells flowing through their veins would state, rather than ask, the many things with Trump.
DeleteFor those of you concerned that your TDS count may have slipped below healthy levels, I'd suggest reviewing Trump's whining accusations that Ted Cruz stole the Iowa primary from him.
Somerby has no evidence that anything was wrong with Biden.
Delete" Something almost surely was wrong with President Biden."
"Almost surely" is a very strong statement of probability. Somerby routinely says things, often generalizations, without much evidence. On the other hand, there is solid evidence from many sources that nothing was wrong with Biden except normal aging and his long-time stuttering problem. Highly respected people attested to Biden's competence. That makes me fairly sure that Somerby's statements about Biden are not very reliable.
"...proper amount of TDS cells flowing through their veins"
DeleteAre you retarded, Hector? You sound retarded.
Delete"Something wrong as in his behavior, making grandiose threats that don't make sense about a war that a majority has said they don't want."
Something's wrong with you, Soros-bot. Because no one in their right mind would concoct a sentence like that.
Agree.
DeleteWhat's wrong with, "Trump is a fascist, leading the USA to fascism, and installed by the Republican Party, a fascist institution."
No concoction necessary.
Everyone should be whatever "fascist" means in your Monkey language, then.
DeleteSqueal louder, 7:24.
DeleteIt's all I ask from the world's biggest victim/ loser.
Trump demands ‘UNCONDITIONAL SURRENDER’ from Iran as he issues chilling threat to Supreme Leader Khamenei
ReplyDeleteJesus Lord have mercy.
Or else, Trump will insult him in public.
DeleteIn serious times like these, facing global conflict, I turn to the wise words of the glorious President Trump, pew, pew, pew, pew, pew. pew, pew. Mike Huckabee is praying that Trump sends him to a higher ground, by getting him nuked in the American embassy in Israel. These people are not weirdos. I am not in a cult.
ReplyDeleteI mean, Trump praised his deal making ability. He claimed Russia would not have attacked Ukraine if he had been in office. What happened to his deal making skills vis a vis Iran? 🤷♀️
ReplyDelete“ it almost surely helps if you can ask that question with an empathetic tone, as opposed to throwing it out as an insult. (Presumably, it helps even more if you can actually mean it when you adopt that tone.)”
ReplyDelete🙄
Jon Stewart -- whose take on Trump is pretty much spot on -- has been asking this for a while. It's a moot point, as the resident cultists will jump on the opportunity to explain how Trump us the greatest peace president of all time.
ReplyDeleteHow DOGE Spread Its Lies About Social Security Fraud:
ReplyDeletehttps://www.lawyersgunsmoneyblog.com/2025/06/the-number-is-40
Senator Lee has deleted his post about the MN shooter.
ReplyDeleteWhat a wuss.
People who think there's something wrong with Trump are ignoring his remarkable achievements. They're easy to overlook, because of media bias and because his stated goals were a lot higher than could be achieved. What did Trump achieve in just 5 months?
ReplyDelete1. Converted a nearly open southern border to a virtually closed southern border, without new legislation.
2. Ended the reverse discriminations of DEI, sort of. Actually this evil is so entrenched that Trump didn't fully kill it, but he made a great start.
3. Real blue-collar wage growth under Trump saw largest increase in nearly 60 years. (This was due to low inflation. Many people don't realize how low inflation has been, because the media have been predicting anticipated high inflation. Their wrong prediction got more ink than the actual results.)
4. Cut $180 billion of government waste. (The exact figure is controversial, but there is no doubt that many billions were saved.)
Just stop the bullshit DiC. You know Somerby is one who thinks there is something wrong with Trump. You seem to view it as your no to come here daily and fluff for Trump. No one here is buying it.
DeleteTypo; As your *job*
Delete7:34 stop acting like a fag.
DeleteThat, ladies and gentlemen, is the level of delusion with which we are dealing.
DeleteDavid has emerged from his secure bunker, did not see any Tren de Aragua milling about, no DEI posters, and he feels safe again! His mind is filled with visions of the money saved by DOGE. It's truly remarkable how things have turned in just four months.
Whatever mental illness Bob thinks is afflicting Trump, it is quite contagious.
I would expect a ten year-old child to have a higher level of skepticism and critical thinking.
"3. Real blue-collar wage growth under Trump saw largest increase in nearly 60 years."
DeleteOh, has "I don't trust anyone, I check all my facts" David gone back into hibernation?
This claim is from a White House press release that cites a NY Post story that quotes Scott Bessent. None of the above cite an actual source for their data.
A couple of questions come to mind:
How do they define "blue-collar"? How did they isolate that data from all hourly workers? Did they use Bureau of Labor Statistics data or a different source? Why choose "first five months" and year-over-year as a basis for comparison? Wouldn't that automatically include seven months of Biden's term?
Man, if you can't smell fish right noew, you can't smell anything.
"2. Ended the reverse discriminations of DEI, sort of."
DeleteTranslation: "He fired some black people and I enjoyed that."
A 160 member panel of historians and presidential experts ranked Trump lowest among all presidents in history, after his first term. Among those panelists identified as conservatives, Trump managed to land in the bottom three. The reason for this is very simple: they had not consulted DiC. Of the countless many absurd positions DiC has taken, arguing for Trump's accomplishments while ignoring his many failures is the most ludicrous.
DeleteDavid in Cal,
DeleteTrump's greatest achievement is tripling the deficit, and still get bigots to claim we could help our fellow citizens, if it wasn't for the problematic deficit.
8:49,
DeleteStop quoting pedophiles.
You notice every time Dickhead in Cal puts a list together of the great accomplishments of Prince Orange Chickenshit, he always leaves off the great accomplishment of filling the SC with 3 Christo-fascists who lied to the Senate during their confirmation and immediately overturned Roe thereby turning this country into a dystopian hell hole for women and resulting in chaos and uncertainty for doctors practicing OBGYN.
DeleteHe forgets to include that because he is a phony lying sack of shit dickhead.
You can train your dog to shit outside in your yard, or you can do like Putin*, and train your dog to drop a dookie at the G7 summit.
ReplyDelete*Through positive reinforcement (in this case, an Adderall after every task done well).
Here's evidence that Boelter is on the conservative side, Supporting Israel and the Judeo-Christian ethic is more conservative than liberal today.
ReplyDeleteAccused Minnesota assassin Vance Boelter expressed fears the US was “turning against Israel” years before he allegedly carried out a sickening political assassination, a former work acquaintance claimed.
Boelter, 57, appeared to become increasingly frustrated by society in the years leading up to the twisted attack and had warned that the US was losing its “Judaic/Christian foundations,”
https://nypost.com/2025/06/18/us-news/accused-minnesota-assassin-vance-boelter-expressed-concern-that-us-was-turning-against-israel/
This is commonly the way right wing rags like the Post, and Fox, operate. In the immediate aftermath of a tragic event they have a short window to insinuate that liberals were somehow involved, as in “Assassin was a Walz appointee.” Rubes like DiC pick up on this and post ludicrous nonsense about how an assassination of Democrats was the work of a Democrat. When the smoke clears and the always obvious truth is no longer able to be manipulated, the propaganda has had a few days to fester among the cult. “On the conservative side” = far right wing Evangelical.
Delete