BLUE RUIN: As flames were devouring the Hollywood hills...

FRIDAY, JANUARY 10, 2025

...Fox News was devouring the discourse: What ever happened to all those drones—to the drones which were swarming all over New Jersey?

We'd been wondering in recent days. Yesterday, somebody asked. 

As seen on the Fox News Channel, a reliable Stepford inquired about this forgotten tale. He spoke with a plainly disordered man:

(PETER) DOOCY (1/9/25): A story that kind of disappeared very suddenly—Do you any idea whatever happened to the drones?

TRUMP: What happened to drones?

DOOCY: Well, you said you knew—you thought the government knew what was happening with these drones over New Jersey. There were some by Bedminster?

TRUMP: I don’t know. They’re all over Bedminster a lot, so I can imagine—

I’m going to give you a report on drones about one day into the administration. Because I think it’s ridiculous that they’re not telling you about what’s going on with the drones...

The imitation of an answer continued on from there. Videotape of the full exchange is provided by Mediaite in its brief report on this press event.

According to the incoming president, "they’re not telling you about what’s going on with the drones." In fact, no one's discussing the drone invasion any more—and that includes Fox News!

At Fox, the flames of the drones had raced up a hillside. But then, all of a sudden, just like that, they disappeared over a hill. 

They had their fun with the tale for a couple of weeks. At that point, the tale disappeared.

For the record, that was Peter Doocy of the Fox News Channel, speaking with the incoming Donald J. Trump. Full disclosure:

There won't be a report on the drones "about one day into the administration." In all likelihood, that particular wildfire has completely run its course. In all likelihood, it won't flare up again.

It's true! The disordered man in question did say, at one point, that "the government knew what was happening with these drones over New Jersey." In all likelihood, he'd simply been devouring one more hillside within our rapidly failing nation's rapidly failing culture.

In the past few days, Blue Ruin has come to large parts of The City of Angels in the form of runaway fires. A more familiar version of Blue Ruin had come to our tribe in the form of the November 5 election—and yes, we Blues had worked very hard to earn our way out in the years, and in the decades, which preceded that event.

We'd earned our way out by ignoring the (unexplained) apparent craziness of President Biden's (unexplained) policy at the southern border. By ignoring President Biden's refusal (or inability) to speak about that and about other major issues. 

By hoping and praying that we could Lock Trump Up. By the endless hours we endlessly spent massaging that tribal dream, even as our tribunes disappeared the topics the electorate was more concerned about. 

By the way we've looked down on "the basket of deplorables" over the course of the past sixty years (on our nation's lower breed). By the way we pursued one absurd position after another in the realm which came to be described as "Woke"—by the way we were unable to see, or unwilling to finger, the plain absurdity of so many of those tribal manifestations. 

By our refusal to see that something seemed to be wrong with the leader of our own party, with the incumbent President Biden. 

Across the nation, the others could see that something seemed to be wrong. Until the night of June 27, we alone couldn't see this apparent problem—and many of our leading figures said he was sharp as a tack.

In such ways, we Blues worked to earn our way out. Our dumbness has been visible to everyone—to everyone except us. 

(In fairness, this is one of the ways we humans are wired. It has always worked this way with our species' tribes.)

Today, though, the topic is the form of ruin which has come to large parts of Los Angeles. Also, though, the topic should be the devouring of the American discourse, the devouring of the American intellect, which was being performed again yesterday all over the Fox News Channel.

Flames devoured the hills of Los Angeles; Fox News has devoured the discourse. And as Fox News has executed that form of Blue Ruin, the New York Times has gazed away, refusing to say their names.

We'll go ahead and say them today. These are the "jugglers and clowns" we watched yesterday as they made mincemeat out of the discourse:

Co-hosts on Fox & Friends, 1/9/25
Lawrence Jones
Steve Doocy
Ainsley Earhardt
Brian Kilmeade
Panelists on The Five, 1/9/25
"Kennedy"
Jessica Tarlov
Jesse Watters
Dana Perino
Greg Gutfeld
Panelists on Gutfeld!, 1/9/25
"Tyrus"
Kat Timpf
Greg Gutfeld (host)
Dana Perino
Jamie Lissow 
Adam Carolla (very special guest)

We watched those collections of jugglers and clowns they pretended to discuss the Los Angeles fires—as they devoured the possibility of having an actual discourse. 

Flames were devouring the Hollywood hills. These flyweights went after the culture.

Since 1965, we Blues have been working very hard to bring ourselves down. As happenstance had it, we ourselves were physically present that year when this effort started.

We hope to describe that historic event next week. For today, we direct you to the eating of the American discourse—to the flames which continue to devour American journalistic and intellectual culture.

(By the way: Where are all the brilliant professors who should be discussing Fox News? Where are the "academics?")

Yesterday, as we watched Fox News, who was the least fair of them all as they pretended to discuss the Los Angeles fires? We'd probably name Kennedy first, but that involves a long-standing bit of personal prejudice. 

We'd also name Adam Carolla, who arrived on the scene with the ugly, stupid, gong-show misogyny of The Man Show. That was back in the early days of the never-ending pushback by the masculine children of this type. Pepperidge Farm remembers:

Adam Carolla

[...]

Carolla co-hosted the syndicated radio call-in program Loveline with Drew Pinsky from 1995 to 2005 as well as the show's television incarnation on MTV from 1996 to 2000. He was the co-host and co-creator of the television program The Man Show (1999–2004), and the co-creator and a regular performer on the television show Crank Yankers (2002–2007, 2019–present). 

Crank Yankers! This is who, and this is what, these unyielding throwbacks are.

Carolla and Kennedy would be our individual choices for yesterday's worst players. We'd also wonder what's going on with the strangely backsliding Jessica Tarlov at this point in time.

The larger question concerns the way Blue America's journalistic and academic elites have chosen to look the other way as this destruction of the nation's discourse and intellect has continued to roll along on a daily, round-the-clock basis.

Yesterday, the Stepfords were advancing the mandated instant claims about the Los Angeles fires. At Trader Vic's, a werewolf's hair was once said to be perfect.

So were yesterday's "cable news" recitations.

At some point, some clarity may be available concerning the claims these children have been reciting. This very morning, we strongly recommend the preliminary assessments offered in this New York Times news report:

‘Completely Dry’: How Los Angeles Firefighters Ran Out of Water.

[...]

Officials now say the storage tanks that hold water for high-elevation areas like the Highlands, and the pumping systems that feed them, could not keep pace with the demand as the fire raced from one neighborhood to another. That was in part because those who designed the system did not account for the stunning speeds at which multiple fires would race through the Los Angeles area this week.

“We are looking at a situation that is just completely not part of any domestic water system design,” said Marty Adams, a former general manager and chief engineer at the Los Angeles Department of Water and Power, which is responsible for delivering water to nearly four million residents of Los Angeles.

Municipal water systems are designed for firefighters to tap into multiple hydrants at once, allowing them to maintain a steady flow of water for crews who may be trying to protect a large structure or a handful of homes. But these systems can buckle when wildfires, such as those fueled by the dry brush that surrounds Los Angeles’s hillside communities, rage through entire neighborhoods.

As urban growth spreads into wilderness areas around the country and climate change brings more challenging fire conditions, an increasing number of cities have confronted a sudden loss of water available for firefighting, most recently in Talent, Ore.; Gatlinburg, Tenn.; and Ventura County, Calif.

The problem can be especially acute during high-wind conditions, like those Los Angeles experienced this week, when firefighting aircraft could not safely make their usual aerial drops of water and fire retardant.

There's more to be found in that assessment—in that preliminary assessment. Even one of the stars of the current show is paraphrased saying this:

Rick Caruso, the real estate developer and former candidate for Los Angeles mayor who served two stints as president of the Department of Water and Power, said he had a team of private firefighters deployed in Pacific Palisades on Tuesday night, helping to protect a major outdoor retail space he owns, Palisades Village, as well as some nearby homes.

All night, he said, the team was reporting that water was in short supply. He said it would take time to account for the supply problems, but suggested there appeared to be a shortfall in preparation.

Will it turn out that there actually was some sort of (serious or actionable) "shortfall in preparation?"

As always, everything is possible! That said, even Caruso has been quoted saying that it will take time to account for the supply problems—and of one thing you can be sure:

By the time some such account has been reliably assembled, the wind-whipped flamers on the Fox News Channel will have leaped ahead to some other set of instant tales.

Flames are devouring the hillsides of The City of Angels. The American discourse is being devoured by an endless array of flamers on the Fox News Channel, but also across the podcast dial.

Back in the early 1990s, it was the New York Times and the Washington Post which invented the Whitewater pseudo-scandal. Starting in March 1999, it was those same mainstream orgs which drove the punitive, twenty-month War Against Gore which sent George Bush to the White House.

Today, our discourse is being devoured by life forms like Gutfeld, Carolla and Kennedy, along with the corporate-owned blowhard Tyrus, a former professional "wrestler."

This array of jugglers and clowns is being paid by the corporation to advance the corporation's Storylines and interests. As they strut and recite their claims, Blue America, producing Blue Ruin, agrees to look away.

We've decided to start saying their names. Fuller profiles will follow, but no one's dumber than we Blues are. We've been proving that point, again and again, as we've worked to earn our way out over these past many long years.

We've long been convinced that we're the smart ones. Sadly, no—we aren't!


65 comments:

  1. Sure. Complain about us ignoring them. But when we suggest putting all these clowns against a wall and shooting them up St. Valentine's Day Massacre style, suddenly we're the intolerant ones.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Exactly. We are told we can’t ignore them (we do not), yet we are instructed to ignore their corruption and criminality? It makes no sense (although it may make some dollars for our faux Cassandra/definite Narcissus blog writers - those “heroes” with empty goals).

      Delete

  2. There's no problem whatsoever with anything the Fox guy asked about the drones, or anything Mr. Trump answered.

    You sound like you're suffering from a severe case of TDS, Bob. TDS is a serious mental illness, Bob. Seek help.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. TDS stands for Trump Derangement Syndrome.
      People who think men shouldn't dream of fucking their own daughters often suffer from it.

      Delete
    2. Sommerby was noting the national panic of alien, Chinese, Iranian drones of nefarious intent dissapeared. Did the drones retreat or did people realize how fcking stupid they are? And when questioned about this the convicted felon does his usual nonanswer answer. I will have a complete post on this next week, just check back here.

      Delete
  3. Somerby blathers a bit about drones and clowns, all just so he can pick up the Republican criticisms of the management of the LA fire fighting. No one should be fooled.

    Interestingly, a fire-fighting plane collided with a drone yesterday. The public was reminded that the use of drones in such a situation is illegal. You would think any idiot would understand that.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Any idiot does not understand how urban water supplies are designed. If they had a clue all the bullshit being spread would be incredulous to sane folks. As a fire protection engineer I have worked with communities to improve their fire (and domestic) water supplies. No water system in the world can handle this fire scenario. End of story.

      Delete
  4. Nothing is more boring than Somerby's repetitious nonsense.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Democratic Party failures listed in the post:

    - Failing to engage meaningfully with the erosion of American discourse and intellect.
    - Ignoring the apparent dysfunction in President Biden’s policies, particularly at the southern border.
    - Ignoring President Biden’s refusal or inability to address major issues openly.
    - Focusing excessively on the idea of "Locking Trump Up" rather than addressing substantive policy concerns.
    - Spending countless hours neglecting issues important to the electorate.
    - Disappearing topics that matter more to the electorate, such as economic and social issues.
    - Looking down on "the basket of deplorables" and perpetuating disdain for certain demographics over decades.
    - Pursuing extreme or absurd positions in "woke" ideology without self-awareness or critique.
    - Refusing to acknowledge the plain absurdities in some tribal manifestations of progressivism.
    - Refusing to recognize or address concerns about President Biden’s apparent cognitive or leadership issues.
    - Claiming, against visible evidence, that Biden was "sharp as a tack."
    - Remaining oblivious to their own intellectual failings, which are apparent to others.
    - Failing to self-reflect and course-correct despite clear evidence of missteps.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yes, Somerby is coming clean about his animosity toward Democrats. That’s old news.

      Delete
    2. You can see that the Democratic Party leadership may have had a plan to emphasize "woke" ideology and "Locking Trump Up" as a way to disappear economic and social issues. Because they didn't want to address those issues as what voters want conflicts with what their corporate donors want. In other words - throw some woke dust at them to pacify them while we put the corporatocracy into full gear.

      Delete
    3. (and get them lots of pictures of Biden eating ice cream cones which they will think makes him cool.)

      Delete
    4. Plus the Haitians are eating our pets!!!!!

      Delete
    5. all of those “reasons”, and Republicans still lied their asses off.

      Delete
    6. "By our refusal to see that something seemed to be wrong with the leader of our own party, with the incumbent President Biden. "

      Disagreeing is not a "refusal to see" something. Because Dems use facts in their thinking while Republicans do not, there are bound to be such fact-based disagreements.

      Delete
  6. After suffering a total defeat in November, it would be a mistake to think that our actions didn't play some part. It wouldn't make sense to think we were not partly responsible.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. It was hardly a total defeat.

      Delete
    2. All of us are responsible for Trump winning the Presidential election. Except, those who voted for Trump. They aren't responsible at all.

      Delete
  7. Yesterday a poster sent a link to an article about how climate affects precipitation, for which I thank her/him. I would point out that the first words are “Current climate models indicate… “ So the conclusions are not established science. They are up in the air.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Go fuck yourself, Dickhead.

      Delete
    2. The nexus between smoking and cardiovascular disease are primarily based on statistical models. Tobacco companies claimed for decades that it was not "established science". What would make anthropogenic climate change "established science"?
      I mind you, first inklings that unfettered carbon emission into the atmosphere could have serious repercussions date back to the turn of the last century.

      Delete
    3. Another swing and a miss by DiC, a climate science denialist. He is only one step removed from Candice Owens who call science a cult. If it does not agree with his narrative, it is speculation. The point of the article is that the impact of climate change is regional and can manifest as worsening dryness in one region and wetness vis a vis hurricanes in another. His statement was that climate change science predicts increased precipitation, so why these wildfires be happening?. He is a forever lying troll.

      Delete
    4. Ilya -- I didn't dispute anthropogenic climate change. I was just pointing out that the effect of climate change on precipitation is not settled science.

      Delete
    5. @1:31 -- I don't think wildfire losses tell us much about climate change, because so many other factors have a bigger impact.

      Delete
    6. I was at the Boulder Colorado wildfire 2 summers ago. Winds then blew over semi trucks. The fire spread very rapidly over large expanses of dry grassy areas into suburbia. There was no issue raised with the amount of water available because with wind speeds of over 80 MPH there is no stopping the carnage. The issue of water availability is just another Fox canard used as a weapon against a Democratic governor.

      Delete


    7. Water is not necessary, as long as there is plenty of homosexuals and men pretending to be women among the firefighters.

      And abortion clinics nearby. And a lot of rainbow flags. Yes, a lot of rainbow flags is a must. Forget the water, who needs water.

      Delete
    8. That's true, 2:54. Natural disasters never happen in republican controlled states where woke goes to die. That's a fact.

      Delete

    9. If there is no abortion clinic near the fire, it can't be extinguished. That's the science. Believe the science, Soros-bot.

      Delete
    10. If there is no abortion clinic near the fire, it can't be extinguished. That's the science. Believe the science, Soros-bot.
      As hard as it is to imagine, there is a universe where such comments are understood and considered clever.

      Delete
    11. David in Cal,
      Do you mind if I quote you when Governors Abbott and DeSantis beg for federal funding to clean-up after hoaxes?

      Delete
    12. David in Cal,
      To clarify my prior response, I'll be quoting you when I tell Abbott and DeSantis that climate change is a hoax, so there should be no federal funding. The "Go fuck yourselves" I send to them is from me, and not a quote from you

      Delete
    13. "I was just pointing out that the effect of climate change on precipitation is not settled science"

      Oh really? This was your statement:

      "Eg., global warming is supposed to increase rainfall, but nobody knows how much of an increase or how much the increased rainfall affects wildfires."

      There is nothing in this statement or any of the larger statement that contains it that refers to whether climate change is settled science. More BS from DiC.

      Reply

      Delete

    14. @Ilya 4:34 PM,
      Have you finalized your transition, Ilya?

      And are you properly boosted? I suspect you are not. Please get a booster. Now. Okay, Ilya?

      Delete
  8. Somerby says no one is dumber than us Blues, yet he was motivated to vote Blue regardless.

    What Somerby’s stance clarifies is that his analysis is the dumbest.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Strong employment, strong dollar, strong growth so the market reacts by throwing a tantrum, as a strong economy threatens fed rate cuts.

    The pattern continues: Republicans make a mess, Dems clean it up; rinse, repeat.

    Anybody know what the hell Bob is rambling on about? Seems like Bob is in the midst of a serious cognitive decline, although he’s been this way for years. Maybe he just sold his soul, anything is possible.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. He’s been this way for years? Then he’s not declining.

      Delete
    2. Declining slowly.

      Delete
  10. This blog has died.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I think you have died and left a bot script running.

      Delete
  11. DiC - 256K jobs. Wow! Just Wow!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. If we had a rational discourse, we'd be discussing whether it was Biden's management of the economy or Clinton's that was the best ever. Biden got us out of the deep pandemic recession; Clinton got rid of the deficit. It's a tough one.

      Delete
    2. 256K jobs
      unemployment ticked down 0.1%
      real wages increased 0.3 %

      Naturally the lunatics on Wall Street jumping out of tall buildings.

      Delete
    3. The worst thing that can happen to Wall Street is labor gets paid.

      Delete
    4. Dow plunges 700 points in response to great economic data. Make it make sense.

      Delete
    5. Because it means no rate cut.

      Delete
    6. Yes, I understand that is the thinking. But I think Jerome needs to get over himself.

      Delete
  12. Defending Adam Carolla, go the link and start at 14:55 and watch a minute or two. You will see hear very germane comments.
    https://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2025/01/08/adam_carolla_i_applied_to_be_a_firefighter_in_la_i_had_to_wait_7_years_to_get_called_back.html

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Oh shit, once again it is the ni**as' fault again. I knew it had to be, right Dickhead in Cal.

      Delete
    2. What? They didn't have an immediate opening for a prank telephone caller?

      I'm shocked.

      Delete
    3. Really, David?

      "Comedian and podcaster Adam Carolla addressed Congress in 2017 and described the difficulty of applying to be a firefighter in Los Angeles in the 1980s."

      Seven years ago someone complained about how he didn't get a phone call forty years ago. And you offer that up as "germane"?

      Delete
    4. Which party ran the state for most of the 80s, David? Hm?

      Delete
    5. Lol - Tom Bradley - hardcore Republican. You people are completely stupid.

      Delete
    6. Quaker— would you see the significance if a black applicant had to wait seven years and the white applicant only had to wait a few days?

      Delete
    7. They administer tests and create a hiring list from those scores. If someone had to wait that long it sounds like they did poorly on the tests.

      Delete
    8. In the end, it always comes down to the "blahs" making your world so miserable, right Dickhead in Cal.

      Delete
  13. 'We hope to describe that historic event next week'

    If that happens I, for one, will be astonished.

    ReplyDelete
  14. "he had a team of private firefighters deployed in Pacific Palisades on Tuesday night, helping to protect a major outdoor retail space he owns, Palisades Village, as well as some nearby homes."

    Oh, really?

    Are these "private firefighters" authorized to tap into the public fire hydrant network? Exactly how many such teams are running around Los Angeles without coordination or supervision?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. If they are recent descendants of Africans, or they are homosexuals, then they certainly must be authorized. There's no way to deny it; that'd be against the law.

      Delete
    2. It would be interesting if you explored some of the theories Somerby listed about why Democrats may have contributed to their loss of all branches of the govt. Eg. do you think by pursuing extreme or absurd positions in "woke" ideology without self-awareness or critique, Dems helped Trump and Republicans win all the branches? Or did too many Democrats refuse to recognize or address concerns about President Biden’s apparent cognitive or leadership issues? Can Democrats take any blame?

      Delete
    3. Are you talking to me?

      Do it yourself.

      Delete
    4. Yes, I'm talking to you. You are not interested in exploring some of these theories about how Democrats may have contributed to their sweeping defeat? Like not honestly addressing concerns about President Biden’s apparent cognitive issues, for example. You don't want to go there?

      Delete
    5. More interested in discussing private firefighter's right to extract water from a public fire hydrant network?

      Delete
    6. I thought Democrats lost the elections because I correctly pointed out that Republican voters are bigots?
      Is that, too, just another Right-wing bullshit lie?

      Delete
  15. Water is hydrogen oxide.

    ReplyDelete