It always happens with Maddow, part 1 and then part 2!

THURSDAY, DECEMBER 20, 2012

Demise of a national treasure: We tend to think that Rachel Maddow is a bit on the dishonest side.

Which is strange. Because yesterday, Alex “Kid” Pareene called her a national treasure! He did this at Salon.

There’s nothing new about that, of course. On December 4, David Atkins also called Maddow a national treasure. Three weeks earlier, dude called Chris Hayes the same thing!

For ourselves, we can’t think of anyone we would call a national treasure. To our ear, the phrase is so monumentally hackneyed that it’s hard to imagine using it.

That said, Pareene’s encomium stuck in our head as the day wore on. Last night, we decided to watch the whole Maddow Show, a task we’ve been skipping of late.

Doggone it! As we watched, the same thing happened that always happens when we take in an evening of Maddow!

For about the first half hour, we thought it might be time to rethink our disgust with Maddow. She is obviously IQ-bright. For that reason, we sometimes get the feeling that we must have been wrong in our past judgments.

But then it happened, pretty much the way it always happens. First, Maddow did a ridiculous report about Susan Rice—a report which simply reeked of bad faith.

There is no way on earth that Maddow believes what she said in that segment. Or so we would have to assume. We assume she can’t be that clueless.

From there, the program moved on to a surprisingly unpleasant takedown of Robert Bork, on the very day he died. Maddow has extremely good manners within the tribe. She’s extremely cold-blooded outside it, and sometimes a bit dishonest.

That said, last evening’s real part 2 came at the end of the program, when Maddow did one of her patented self-correction segments.

The star was perched beneath her familiar DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS sign. In our view, the segment served two basic Maddow purposes:

Rather plainly, it was designed to help us learn to love Maddow even more. And it reinforced a central claim which we liberals tend to repeat in comments: Rachel Maddow always corrects her mistakes!

As usual, the mistake on which she corrected herself was totally trivial—the mispronunciation of the name of the fatuous music act, Ke$ha. Rachel went on and on about how she’s getting so old, unlike her staff.

In our view, this probably helped us learn to love her more.

This foolishness burned a whole segment. But how odd! Rachel didn’t correct herself for mispronouncing Senator Daniel Inouye’s name all through a segment on Monday night. By Tuesday night, she was pronouncing his name correctly—but she didn’t note her repeated mistake from the night before.

Just a guess: Admitting she didn’t know Inouye’s name would have made her look politically clueless. Correcting herself on Ke$ha’s name—well, it didn’t matter much. Plus, she got to play a tape of Ke$ha vapidly explaining how her name actually sounds.

To watch Maddow mispronounce “Inouye” seven times in less than two minutes, just click here. As she does, she will tell you that Inouye was “a genuine American hero.”

You can tell that she really means it.

To watch Maddow’s report on Susan Rice, click here. Tomorrow, we'll discuss what she said.

Yes, she was defending Rice. But every word was bogus.

In our view, Maddow is almost pathologically faux. For that reason, she simply isn’t a national treasure, unless you treasure a world in which clever folk get themselves on TV, then treat average people like rubes.

Extra credit: To get clear about pronouncing Ke$ha, just click this. Based on her look and her on-line back-story, Ke$ha strikes us as a moderately burned-out version of Jewel.

24 comments:

  1. "national treasure" = narrative
    "no spin zone" = narrative
    "Dana Milbank is smart" = narrative
    cutting taxes = increase revenue = narrative
    John McCain = "maverick" = narrative
    Collins & Dowd = funny = narrative
    Alex Perene = perceptive = narrative

    Happy Holidays!

    ReplyDelete
  2. I've never understood why, if these high status anchors don't know how to pronounce something, they don't ask a producer or other intelligent staff member before they go on air. Maybe no one on her staff had ever heard "Inouye" pronounced. It does make her look like an idiot.

    I won't bother watching any video about Ke$ha, but someone tell me, do you pronounce the dollar sign?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. "but someone tell me, do you pronounce the dollar sign?"

      That is F#CKING funny!!!

      Delete
    2. The one time I watched the television show Glee, the principal pronounced Ke$sha's name as "Key dollar sign ha." Priceless. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yh4T07xoluE

      Delete
    3. That is a joke from one of Kesha's own videos as well.

      I saw Pareene's comment on his hack list and it made me sad- if he had the same eye for Maddow as for others on his list, he wouldn't have said that.

      Delete
  3. Great take on the Maddow mistake-- although she did correct it after the break-- somebody must have said something.

    But still--- it's clueless, yes. BTW, anyone know who the longest-serving senator was?

    ReplyDelete
  4. I don't and never have understood why people like Maddow. I know Bob isn't crazy about Chris Hayes either, but CH, whatever his flaws, tries to run a genuinely intelligent discussion show for two hours twice a week (four hours total, as opposed to Maddow's five) and most of the time he succeeds. I know Bob will kvetch. That's Bob. A person has to have exactly the same interests as Bob or they aren't good enough. But Chris's show is vastly superior to Maddow's. Maybe Maddow dumbs things down for ratings--maybe these TV types know what the audience will stand for, and an hour of intelligent conversation each weekday night would result in low ratings. According to that Salon article, Ed Shultz is a ratings star at MSNBC, so that tells you something.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. And yes, Chris himself praises Maddow. But I set that down to plain old careerism combined with loyalty. He works for MSNBC and I think he got his start with Maddow, and so for both good and bad reasons he's got to praise her.

      Delete
  5. In "Chinatown" , Jake Gitties is asked if a cop he knows is honest. "Yes, but he has to swim in the same waters we all do."

    The Kid also wrote that Gail Collins is hilarious.

    ReplyDelete
  6. This is what TDH does best. Beautifully done.

    Also, if Bob Dylan isn't an American Treasure I'm not sure those words do have any meaning.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Hello There. I found your blog the use of msn.

    That is an extremely neatly written article.

    I'll make sure to bookmark it and come back to learn more of your helpful information. Thank you for the post. I will definitely return.

    My blog post www.propertywide.co.uk

    ReplyDelete
  8. Wow, amazing blog layout! How long have you been blogging for?

    you make blogging look easy. The overall look of your website is excellent, as well as the content!


    My weblog homepage

    ReplyDelete
  9. I just could not go away your website before suggesting that I really loved the standard
    info a person provide on your guests? Is gonna
    be back ceaselessly to check up on new posts

    Stop by my web-site - home

    ReplyDelete
  10. As the methane causes further warming in the atmosphere, and use a
    cloth and your fingers to do the job: an SSD, a USB-to-SATA adapter.

    Oysters are an excellent choice amongst conventional keyboards and competing with the
    best in you. I put the Fleshlight away
    for a few accelerometer-based titles. After opening the map,
    you can delve into the whole list or narrow it down by category.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Quality articles is the important to attract the people to pay
    a visit the website, that's what this web site is providing.

    My web site: improve female libido naturally

    ReplyDelete
  12. Great delivery. Outstanding arguments.

    ReplyDelete
  13. I truly love your site.. Great colors & theme.

    ReplyDelete
  14. Your writing taste has been surprised me. Thank you

    ReplyDelete
  15. Thank you for publishing a very informative post. Every post of yours is very awesome, we feel satisfied by reading it. Please keep writing such post further.

    ReplyDelete

  16. This article is quite interesting and I am looking forward to reading more of your posts. Thanks for sharing this article with us.

    ReplyDelete

  17. Your article is very nice, thank you for share this information. It is very useful for all peoples there are all possibilities to provide for this blog. again thank you for posting this blog.

    ReplyDelete
  18. Amazing issues here. I am very glad to see your post. Thanks so much and I’m taking a look forward to contact you.

    ReplyDelete