FRIDAY: "Multiple paths," the Cook Report says!

FRIDAY, AUGUST 21, 2026

Unless you're watching Fox: Who will control the Senate next year?  

We have no idea. If we were somehow forced to bet, we'd bet that the GOP will retain control, but it seems to us that old rules of thumb concerning such predictions have never seemed quite so old.   

In yesterday morning's report, we reported this new fact:

El-Sayed is ahead by sevenunless you're watching Fox!  

That bit of whimsy concerned one part of the clowning which had occurred on the previous day's edition of The Five

Leave it to the children! During their discussion of a recent statement by Chuck Schumer, Emily Compagno was incoherent and Harold Ford was an embarrassing mess, with Dana Perino ruling the roost. 

Along the way, we noted the fact that even if Michigan falls, observers have begun to say that there are now several ways Democrats could imaginably end up in control of the Senate.   

Today, Sarah Rumpf discusses this state of affairs over at Mediaite. Headline included, her report starts like this:   

Cook Political Report Finds Democrats Have ‘Multiple Paths’ to Take the Senate  

The Cook Political Report updated its ratings for the upcoming midterms, predicting that Democrats now have “multiple paths” to take back the Senate majority, especially with Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton (R) dragging down Republicans.

The GOP’s grasp on majority control of the House and Senate hangs in the balance this November, and political prognosticators and pollsters have been highlighting several states that are in play, including the Lone Star State, where Texas State Rep. James Talarico (D) is facing off against Paxton to succeed the incumbent, Sen. John Cornyn (R-TX). 

[...]  

The new shifts, [Cook's Jessica] Taylor said, mean “there are multiple paths now for Democrats to Senate majority,” so even if they lose tough races in Maine or Michigan, for example, they could still take the Senate.

It was “still a very narrow path” and Cook was now rating the overall Senate majority as a Toss Up, said Taylor. It “still might slightly favor Republicans,” she continued, “but it is an increasingly competitive opportunity for Democrats.”   

The Cook Report isn't always right. But that's what the Cook Report says.

Like the performers on The Five, we have no way of knowing what will happen in November. Unlike the silly stars of The Five, we do know how to describe what Chuck Schumer recently said to the Washington Post.   

Overall, the clowning on The Five is an undisguised assault on the very possibility of the American project. Last night, we forced ourselves to watch a large chunk of Jesse Watter Primetime, which operates from the sludge-filled basement found beneath the National Tabloid / Slag Heap Building.

The Fox News Channel is a disgrace. So are the endless Blue American news orgs which are unwilling to report and discuss what the messengers do over there.

Our stars are afraid to talk about Fox. They're graduates of the finest schools, but they simply aren't willing to serve.

HOPELESSLY DEVOTED/LIMITED JUDGMENT: "He felt compassion," Chekhov wrote!

FRIDAY, AUGUST 21, 2026

We Blues most likely won't: "Jesus Christ is down here on the waterfront?"

We ourselves don't hold religious or cosmological beliefs, aside from the belief that we humans don't know what we are or where we are or how we happen to be here.  

Other people do have religious beliefs. In the honored film, On the Waterfront, the Karl Malden characterFather Pete Barrytells a collection of angry longshoremen that Jesus Christ is right down there, is among them.   

Telephonically, and by happenstance, we had occasion last Sunday to discuss the film's female undercard. We spoke with a lifelong friend about the performance by Eva Marie Saint.

In that part of the film, the Brando characterTerry Malloyis able to see that Edie Doyle is a better person than he is. Remarkably, he tries to become more like her.   

It starts in the famous scene where the young pair walk in a park. He picks up the glove she has dropped and slips it onto his hand. 

Soon, she tells him how she would have treated him, back in their days in Catholic school when the nuns had treated him harshly:    

TERRY: The way those sisters used to whack me, I don't know what. They thought they were gonna beat an education into me, but I foxed 'em.   

EDIE: Maybe they just didn't know how to handle you.   

TERRY: How would you have done it?   

EDIE: With a little more patience? And kindness?  

We'd call that a very strong moment, and an unusual plea.

As the movie proceeds, Terry Malloy lets the deeply insightful female character help him discover the depth of his conscience. (That key word appears throughout). 

Inevitably, the film was destined to end with a furious fist fightwith the classic masculine solution. But in our view, it's this unusual gender undercard which makes the film so great.

We're recommending kindness today in one part of the conduct of our Blue political wars. Are you able to feel empathy for this new arrival on the front?   

Natalie Harp  

Natalie Harp (born 1991) is an American political aide and former television presenter who has served as special assistant to the president and executive assistant to the president of the United States since 2025.

[...]

Natalie Harp was born in 1991. Her father, Robert Harp, was a real estate broker who founded a consultancy for travel companies; he died by suicide in July 2020. Harp was raised in California. She is a practicing Christian. She and her brother were homeschooled. Harp graduated from Point Loma Nazarene University in 2012, and from Liberty University in 2015 with an MBA.  

By 2017, Harp had become vocally critical of healthcare in the United States after she began suffering from health issues, particularly chronic pain and complications incurred by a medical error involving intravenous therapy for stage II bone cancer. In a 2019 interview on Fox News, she praised Trump for signing into law a federal right-to-try law that she claimed allowed her to access experimental treatments which she credited with saving her life. However, The Washington Post cast doubt on Harp's story, citing experts that noted the law's limited scope and reporting that two months before the law was signed she had already made public comments about receiving the new treatment.   

Trump invited Harp to speak at the 2020 Republican National Convention... By that month, she had become a member of the advisory board for Trump's 2020 presidential campaign.   

And so on from there.

That background isn't much like ours. That said, can you imagine feeling empathy for someone whose father took his own life when she was 28for someone who apparently dealt with a life-threatening cancer condition when she was even younger than that?   

(For that Washington Post article, just click here. We've never seen anyone say that Harp didn't face a life-threatening cancer issue in the period described.)

Today, Harp will become a figure of ridicule due to the release of two letters she wrote to the president in recent years. In one of the letters, she expresses gratitude for the fact that she'd been able to travel to Ireland and Scotland as a Trump aide:   

"I’ll never forget when you made that promise to me after losing my Dad, and I know how happy he is right now that I did get to go to Scotland and Ireland, as he always wanted for me." 

Are you able to feel for that person? To read the letters in full, click here. For excerpts, click this.  

(Chekhov, writing of the male protagonist Gurov in The Lady with the Lapdog, a story widely considered to be one of the greatest ever written: "He felt compassion for this life, still so warm and lovely, but probably already not far from beginning to fade and wither like his own...He felt profound compassion.")  

Harp will be subjected to extensive ridicule. It's the way Homey plays.

Beyond that, she seems to have vastly imperfect political and journalistic judgment, as is true of many others in this dangerous, rage-filled time.   

It seems that Harp's conduct has sometimes, perhaps frequently, been highly unusual. According to Maggie Haberman, the Secret Service had become "alarmed" at one point by the content of her letters to Trumpand given the way the world sometimes works, it's hard to say that their concern was misplaced.   

That said, Natalie Harp is a person. On this morning's Morning Joe, Joe Scarborough described this aspect of her person as he spoke with John Heilemann:

SCARBOROUGH (8/21/28): By the way, I've spoken to Natalie Harp a good bit, as most people havevery polite, and we have polite, kind conversations. I've been in the White House, and I’ve talked to Donald Trump, the president, and seen her there. Never once assumed anything inappropriate was going on...

Scarborough described an actual person, a person with whom he has routinely spoken in thoroughly normal ways. He seems to say that she traffics in kindness on the personal level, even when conversing with an aggressive critic of the highly disordered person she serves.

That said, her behavior has been unusual. She seems to have extremely bad judgment, much like the powerful person who has positioned her where she is.

Of course, other people have limited judgment too. For all the outstanding work he has done, Scarborough still refuses to tell the truth about the person for whom Harp works. 

Scarborough is hardly alone in that agreement not to speak. Many of us Blues are going to beat up on Harp while refusing to be forthright about the much more powerful man. And by the way:

Heilemann's elaborate claim todayhis claim that Jon Ossoff wasn't making an insinuation when he mentioned "Natalie" in his speechcould hardly have been much more clueless. We may discuss that cluelessness tomorrow.

In closing for today, we'll say this:

Harp's outsized devotion to the sitting president is one thing. Beyond that, her apparent lack of journalistic judgment is amazingly widespread.

Steven Cheung's ugly rage is something much more significant. Our heralded Blue American journalists all know the backstory here. 

They know the source of the destructive rage. Eagerly preserving their access to paychecks, they all agree not to name it.

Still coming: The rage of Trump and Cheung


THURSDAY: He knows how to buy good trees!

THURSDAY, AUGUST 20, 2026

And he's very good at flagpoles: "I'm very good at flagpoles," the sitting president said.   

He said it yesterday, during a 32-minute press corps excursion. On CNN, Kasie Hunt described as "an impromptu tour of his various White House construction projects."   

The man is clearly out on his feet. The comment recalls what he said to Haberman and Swan when they interviewed him in the Oval Office at the start of the current war:

From Regime Change, Haberman/Swan:
As he greeted us, the war seemed the furthest thing from Trump’s mind. On the Resolute Desk, instead of a map of the Middle East, were printouts of maple trees. 
“I’m ordering trees for the White House,” Trump told us. “I know how to buy good trees.”   

Plainly, he's out on his feet. He says he knows how to buy good trees, and he's very good at flagpoles.  

The man is out on his feet. The press corps' refusal to come to terms with that fairly obvious fact is an astonishing part of our failing nation's journalistic culture.

It's especially amazing to see the press corps refuse to discuss this state of affairs in the wake of the situation which unfolded with the previous president.  

That said, nothing is going to make them change. And when academics (quite rarely) attempt to speak, they end up losing their jobs.

It's in this context that the peculiar behavior widely attributed to executive assistant Natalie Harp takes on obvious relevance, though we recommend generosity here, even a bit of kindness.

Very unusual behavior seems to surround the sitting president. We'll plan on detailing what we mean when we return to this topic tomorrow.


PITIFUL/INACCURATE: A new poll had the hopeful ahead!

THURSDAY, AUGUST 20, 2026

Unless you were watching The Five: Another day, another pollthough of course, it's only one poll.   

The new Michigan poll is only one poll. But here's what the new poll says:   

SHOCK POLL: El-Sayed Opens Up 7-Point Lead Over GOP Rival After Recent Data Showed Him Trailing   

Michigan Senate candidate Abdul El-Sayed (D) came ahead with a healthy lead on his opponent Republican Mike Rogers in the latest polling following recent surveys showing a much closer race.

According to polling from Susquehanna released on Wednesday, El-Sayed is polling at 46% while Rogers is seven points behind at 39%.   

Other recent polling has shown a much closer race. A Fox News survey had Rogers leading El-Sayed at 51%-47%...

Last week, we took note of that Fox News poll. The new poll from Susquehanna has El-Sayed up by seven. 

Susquehanna Polling and Research has often been praised for its work in the past. That, of course, doesn't mean that this new poll has to be accurate. 

Is El-Sayed actually leading Rogers at this point? There's no way to know for sure! We do know that we all should feel sorry for the messenger children of the Fox News Channel, who found themselves forced to go deep into the blarney on the day that new survey appeared.  

Friends, is there anything Dana Perino won't say at this point? Surrounded by a gang of spear-chuckers, she was assigned the unlovely task of leading the second pseudo-discussion on yesterday's edition of The Five.  

Their mission, should the panelists choose to accept it:

Convince the largest audience in all of American "cable news" that El-Sayed's efforts are coming undone. 

Perino was hosting the segment. Because there's nothing she won't read from prompter for pay, she wittily started with this:  

PERINO (8/19/26): So he's Chucky [?] mission overboard! 

Chuck Schumer sure sounds like he's already hedging his bets on far-left Abdul El-Sayed, the candidate he did not back in the primary, telling the Washington Post [text appears on the screen]:

"A path to winning back the Senate clearly goes through Michigan, but we have a whole bunch of different paths." 

Inevitably, a witty Fox chyron said this: 

SCHUMER CHUCKS EL-SAYED  

With Perino politely reciting, that's what millions of viewers were told. 

Having said that, hold on! Did that statement really make it sound like Schumer has given up on the Michigan Senate race? As the segment proceeded, the other children agreed to pretend that it did. 

It didn't quite sound that way to us. When we went to the Washington Post report in question, this is the larger passage we found:   

Backlash in Michigan complicates Democrats’ road to retaking the Senate

[...]

Schumer said he was confident El-Sayed would win, citing the enthusiasm of his supporters. Still, Schumer and J.B. Poersch, the president of Senate Majority PAC, the lead Democratic super PAC in Senate races, both disputed that Democrats had no shot at retaking the majority without Michigan.

“A path to winning back the Senate clearly goes through Michigan, but we have a whole bunch of different paths,” Schumer said.  

We don't know what Schumer actually thinks, but that's the actual Post report about what he actually said. He may even believe, as some observers may be coming to do, that Democratic candidates suddenly seem to be alive in an unexpected number of traditional red states. 

(That would include some Independent candidates who would caucus with Democrats.) 

We don't know what Schumer thinks, but that's what Schumer said. Unless you were watching The Five, where Dana Perino was reading text designed to please Fox viewers.

Increasingly, we're struck by the things Perino seems to be willing to do on The Five. In that opening volley, she pleasured viewers with the thought that it's all over in Michigandid so on the very day when a poll arrived showing El-Sayed ahead by seven points! 

The new poll went unmentioned by Perino, but also by the day's other performers:   

The Five: Wednesday, August 19, 2026  
Emily Compagno: co-host, Outnumbered  
Harold Ford: increasingly hard to explain
Jesse Watters: host, Jesse Watters Primetime 
Dana Perino: co-host, The Five 
Tom Shillue: comedian

Her initial presentation hadn't seemed to make sense, but the other children played along as the segment continued. 

It fell to Harold Ford to say the following. Allegedly, he was sitting in the program's Democratic Party/non-MAGA chair. It fell to him to say this. 

PERINO: Harold Ford Jr., if Michigan is off the table, do the Senate Republicans breathe a little easier, even if they're having to spend a lot of money in Ohio and Texas?  

FORD: So, for the leader of the Democrats in the Senate to say that about Michigan, I think it gives a window, not only into his thinking, but I think some of the things Jesse said in his remarks about, his comments about, the swing vote there...  

Did Ford know what Schumer had actually said? Later, the persistently puzzling Emily Compagno improbably pitched in with this:

PERINO: Emily, Bernie Brosand Bernie Sanders himself strikes again. And I imagine that Chuck Schumer doesn't want to be seeing him in the lunchroom.

COMPAGNO: It's so telling that he's not sayingSchumer's not saying, "OK, come on, guys! We can still win!" Or, "We can still win without Michigan." 

He's explaining how they can win without Michigan. So this is not sort of cheerleading to me. This is not championing, this is crisis management.  

In fairness, Compagno is a famous fast talker. We aren't sure if the word "or" was included in her initial jumble or not.

Either way, we have no idea what she meant, and neither did anyone else. It was "close enough for cable news work" on the day when that new poll appeared.

("I think they've already given up" on Michigan, Compagno eventually said.)

Regarding Perino, she advanced two other points to tell Fox viewers what Fox News wanted its viewers to hear:   

Additional points from Perino: 

1) A 20-year-old staffer for El Sayed had made a stupid remark on X. According to several panelists, this would surely be enough to doom the campaign all by itself 

2) Back in May, the candidate had "compared himself to Jesus."   

The silly remark by the 20-year-old is likely to affect as many as zero votes. The children were really reaching when they wailed about that.   

Regarding El-Sayed as Jesus, Perino voiced that claim as soon as she had finished pretending to report what Schumer had said. We're going to leave it to you to decide if El-Sayed had drawn some such comparison in some sort of troubling way.   

You can click here to see what The Five's viewers were shown. For a somewhat fuller presentation of the interview session in May, you can simply click this.   

As for yesterday's presentation, we would tell you this:   

Schumer had told the Washington Post that El Sayed is going to win. Also, a new poll had him up by seven points:

Unless you were watching The Five!

Tomorrow: Days of "socialism" (and what the Sam Hill is that?)


WEDNESDAY: All we humans secretly want...

WEDNESDAY, AUGUST 19, 2026

...is a chance to talk about this: We had planned to write, this afternoon, about the remarkable strength of the rhetoric.

The remarkable strength of Jon Ossoff's rhetoric. The remarkable strength of this:

SENATOR OSSOFF (8/16/26): In this White House, they view persistence in deceit as a virtue. You hear me, Atlanta?

And there's something uniquely despicable about lying a nation into war. Treating citizens as fools, and those who serve as pawns.

Aboard the U.S.S. Abraham Lincoln, they've now been at sea for 240-plus days without a port call. It's a Navy record. And still—and still—

And still, they serve with excellence. 

And still, they serve with excellence! God bless the sailors, Marines, aviators and all aboard the United States Ship Abraham Lincoln! 

AUDIENCE: [Cheers]    

See, they don't expect luxury. They'll endure hardship. But they deserve competent leaders who send them into combat only when necessary, and with decisive clarity of purpose, not fools who lie about the purpose and progress of war.  

And while the sailors on the Lincoln fight his war, while he fruitlessly drains our munitions and oil reserves, the president sleeps through his meetings. He golfs, and trades stocks. 

See, he doesn’t want to do the job. He wants to build his ballroom and travel with Natalie on their apparently defenseless flying palace gifted by the emir of Qatar.   

To watch the speech, just click this. That passage starts at the 7:30 mark.

Good God! "They view persistence in deceit as a virtue?" Especially as delivered, that's a brilliant formulation.

And then, after praising the greatness of us the peopleafter praising the greatness of we who servehe actually delivered this string of stinging insults:

While he fruitlessly drains our munitions and oil reserves, the president sleeps through his meetings. He golfs, and trades stocks.

See, he doesn’t want to do the job. He wants to build his ballroom and travel with Natalie on their apparently defenseless flying palace gifted by the emir of Qatar.

"He wants to build his ballroom and travel with Natalie on their apparently defenseless flying palace gifted by the emir of Qatar?"

"On their apparently defenseless flying palace gifted by the emir of Qatar?" Wow:

Like waves rolling in when you might even drown, those final twelve (12) words, all by themselves, deliver one stinging insult after another. And the fact that you've never heard anyone else say it that way suggests the possibility that he actually means it!

David Axelrod laments the presence of two widely cited words: 

"With Natalie." 

In a tweet, he says this:   

AXELROD (8/19/26): No one has been more consistently eloquent or incisive in exposing @realDonaldTrump than @Ossoff. The paragraph from his weekend speech that has gotten so much attention was a brutal takedown.

But two words in it, "with Natalie" seemed gratuitous and unnecessary.

They juiced the virality of it, I'm sure. Probably thrilled some in the base, who figured it was just giving Trump a taste of his own nasty medicine.

But they distracted and detracted from the power of the message.   

We agree with the words we've highlighted. That said, should Ossoff have included the two words in question? 

We can teach it flat or round.  

Of one thing you can be sure. Many people "in the base," and certainly in the mainstream press, did in fact hear nothing except those two thrilling words. 

It's what we were told, long ago, by a major player inside the Bill Clinton re-election campaign:  

It's all about the girl, she (very) sadly said, as the Lewinsky excitement was breaking. 

She meant that the national press wanted to talk about nothing elsewere going to talk about nothing else. It's clear from much of the current reaction that many of us the people today are reacting in a similar way.

We'd call that human, not wrong. Meanwhile, there's the enduring madness of the rhetoric favored by Steven Cheung. Let's consider that tomorrow.


CRAZY/IRRESPONSIBLE: "That horrific shell of a human," she said!

WEDNESDAY, AUGUST 19, 2026

Compagno does it again: In our view, Emily Compagno belongs on major "cable news" shows the way a flounder belongs on a bicycle.   

That doesn't mean that she's a bad person. By normal standards, the vast majority of people, ourselves included, would be un- or under-qualified for the prominent role afforded to Compagno by the gruesome corporate tools who run the Fox News Channel. 

Having said that, whatever! Last night, there the reliable firebrand sat, part of the stunningly undistinguished panel which had been assembled for the Gutfeld! show. 

(For the record, Gutfeld! isn't a "late-night comedy show," as the channel likes to pretend. It's a propaganda messaging program which airs in classic primetime slotsat 10 p.m. in the East, at 9 o'clock in the Central time zone, at 7 p.m. on the coast.)   

Last night, the usual collection of droogs had been assembled to pretend to discuss news topicsand before long, there she went again! During the program's second segment, Compagno piped up with this outburstwith an outburst we'll explain below.

She spoke with guest host Tom Shillue:  

SHILLUE (8/18/26): Has the corner finally turned on Fauci?  

COMPAGNO: I mean, it must have. Look, when I first saw this

First of all, none of us are surprised, and we've been covering it herethe abject fraud and corruption that that horrific shell of a human Fauci was wielding during Covid to really destroy our lives and lose lives. 

As you can see if you click that link, she ranted on, in this dangerous way, as she routinely does, attacking "that horrific shell of a human."

According to Compagno, Dr. Fauci had been wielding power during Covid "to destroy our lives." Given the world we're all living in, that of course is dangerous talk. 

For the record, we don't doubt Compagno's sincerity for a moment. Here's what she was talking about:   

Last week, Terry Moran described a report about the possible origin of Covid which he said he once prepared for ABC News. As Mediaite reports, Moran said this, along the way, about his own personal conclusion: 

Terry Moran Says ABC Gutted His Covid Lab Leak Investigation...

[...]

Moran pitched the story to Nightline, which producers accepted enthusiastically, and said the resulting investigation included interviews with molecular virologists and former Trump administration officials. He also claimed the reporting “broke a little news” that the Wuhan lab had received funding from the Chinese military, citing information from a U.S. intelligence source.

Moran said his reporting left him personally believing a natural origin was “probably a little bit more likely,” while adding that he would not have been surprised if the virus had escaped from a laboratory.

“But I didn’t reach that conclusion. I just laid it out,” he said.

Maybe a lab leak, more probably not. That was Moran's impression at the time.   

Needless to say, that part of Moran's recollection wasn't mentioned by Compagno or by anyone else last night. On the Gutfeld! program, the Covid virus will only be said to have come from the lab. Gutfeld! viewers are constantly told that everybody "knows" that.   

According to Moran, he created this report for Nightline in early 2021. On the very day it was slated to air, the report was heavily editedwas made "incomprehensible," Moran saysby ABC's lawyers and standards officials.   

Moran said he was told that the lawyers and standards officials had run the original transcript by Dr. Fauci. He stressed the fact that he doesn't know that for a fact.

At this site, we're not sure why the network officials wouldn't have done that. Moran isn't sure that they did.   

Moran didn't like the "incomprehensible" finished product. His judgment may have been good. But that podcast presentation by Moran formed the basis for the second segment of last night's Gutfeld! program. In the first segment, the obedient panelists wasted everyone's time pretending to discuss the latest pointless remarks by the irrelevant Hunter Biden, who's easy for MAGA to mock.

With respect to Dr. Fauci, Compagno engaged in her typical dangerous talk. These were the mutts on hand as she sounded off: 

Gutfeld!: Tuesday, August 18, 2026  
Rob O'Neill: Former member, Seal Team Six  
Kat Timpf: Comedian 
Tom Shillue: Guest host, comedian 
Emily Compagno: Co-host, Outnumbered  
Rich Vos: Comedian

We ourselves know Rich from long ago. We think of him as a very good guya very good guy who has no earthly business being on a major "cable news" program, pretending to discuss major, life-and-death topics.   

As for the ongoing attacks on Dr. Fauci manufactured by mutts like these, we direct your attention to the following recent articles:   

On August 16, print editions of the New York Times contained the following article. Online, the article was published three days earlier:   

Trump Officials Falsely Connect Covid Vaccines to Miscarriage   

Trump administration officials and other prominent Republicans falsely suggested this week that Covid-19 vaccines were linked to miscarriage, seizing misleadingly on old text messages of Dr. Anthony Fauci’s that were recently released by Republican senators.

In January 2021, when Covid vaccines had just been released, Dr. Fauci and other Biden administration officials discussed the limitations of the data then available about vaccination during pregnancy, as well as the theoretical risks for pregnant women based on information available at the time. Since then, studies of hundreds of thousands of women have shown that Covid vaccination is not linked to an increased risk of miscarriage, stillbirth or preterm birth.

While those specific conversations were not public, health officials did not hide the uncertainty in early 2021. There was limited data because of a longstanding practice of excluding pregnant women from clinical trials. What was known then was based on women who happened to become pregnant while enrolled in a vaccine trial and on animal testing.

But pregnant women were becoming critically ill and dying from Covid infections, so the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recommended that they talk to their doctors about vaccination, weighing the known risks of Covid itself—which, along with severe illness and death, included miscarriage and stillbirth—and the vaccine safety data that existed.   

The report continued from there. This is not the topic which Moran discussed, but it was an examination of the misrepresentations which have continued to emerge from within the MAGA worldand from the profoundly irresponsible if well-intentioned Compagno.   

On August 15, The Atlantic published a lengthy, nuanced report about the irresponsible MAGA behavior. We won't attempt to walk you through the whole thing, but Daniel Engber's lengthy report started like this:

Anthony Fauci’s Group Chat Is Making People Lose Their Minds

...Senator Ron Johnson announced this week that he’d retrieved tens of thousands of messages and hundreds of voicemails from Fauci’s government-issued device and made them fully searchable. In the meantime, though, Johnson has shared just a single set of texts: a Fauci group chat that he considered so explosive in its implications that it had to be released forthwith. “This is a blockbuster revelation,” the senator said on Tuesday. The public had to know.

The texts in question were from a short exchange that Fauci had with two other public-health officials—former U.S. Surgeon General Vivek Murthy and former CDC Director Rochelle Walensky—in January 2021. Murthy had asked whether either of them knew of “any data or theoretical reason” why an expectant mother might choose to vaccinate early versus late in pregnancy. Walensky answered no, that this was all “data free.”   

Fauci agreed, but a couple of hours later, he followed up. After asking around, he’d heard about a theoretical concern: A second dose of the vaccine could lead to fever and cytokine storm—an overactivation of the immune system, also linked to COVID itself—which in turn might lead to early-term miscarriage. In an interview that Fauci gave just one week later, he alluded to the need for balanced thinking on vaccination during pregnancy, given the lack of clinical-trial data. But he noted that thousands of expectant mothers had already gotten shots by then, and no issues had arisen. “We’ve got to be careful,” he said, but “I would rather take my chances with a vaccine than getting infected while I’m pregnant.”   

Fauci’s critics now assert that this was tantamount to murder. Fauci knew that COVID shots were killing babies, they argue—he said so in a private text—and then he went out and pretended that the shots were safe. Representative Anna Paulina Luna called this “a crime against humanity and the most evil thing that could’ve ever been done.” Meghan McCain demanded that the 85-year-old be handcuffed, perp-walked, and put in a jail cell for the rest of his life. (“This is not hyperbole,” she noted, rather unconvincingly.) Senator Roger Marshall called for the appointment of a special counsel to investigate the matter—either that, he said, or “a full 9/11-style commission.”

...In fact, the new material is unremarkable, unrevealing, and—worst of all—maddeningly irrelevant to the many, far more interesting questions that still surround one of our most important public-health leader’s behavior and decision making during the pandemic...

And so on, at length, from there. Crazy accusation is easy. Establishing facts is hard.

(For additional Republican bungling, click here.)

As Mark Twain once never said, accusations of murder get halfway around the world before nuanced assessment can get its boots on. And then, up will jump the well-intentioned Compagno with her latest irresponsible language, toying with life and death on a mutt-rich national stage.  

Our own Blue American journalists refuse to discuss the conduct of this "cable news channel." All too plainly, any society which functions this way has already become a failed state.

Tomorrow: Woke/Not Especially Fruitful


TUESDAY: Rosie O'Donnell took Kimmel's place!

TUESDAY, AUGUST 18, 2026

Timpf sat in for Gutfeld: We didn't know that Rosie O'Donnell was guest hosting for Jimmy Kimmel last night.  You can watch her 15-minute monolog here. We're not even sure we endorse her approach, but she was just plain very good. 

We had a different reaction to a different guest hosting spotto Kat Timpf's appearance on last night's Gutfeld! program.   

Timpf didn't seem especially comfortable in this relatively unfamiliar role. That's completely understandable. What we find hard to grasp is the role that was played in last night's program by this silly, sad, stupid "news report" in the New York Post

In our view, it's amazing to think that a major newspaper clutters its pages with inane reports of that type. It's even more amazing to think that a person like Timpf would then decide to devote some time to the topicwould do so while hosting the nation's third most watched "cable news" program.   

To see the joke the guest host fashioned, you can just click here. To their credit, the audience seems puzzled by what it has heard. Timpf then tries to explain what made her joke so hilarious, with no apparent success.

About ten minutes later, Timpf thanks Kennedy, the former VJ who served as one of her guests, for "appreciating" her joke. She then explains the joke all over again, saying that she had been "excited about it all day."

(By the way, yes! That was the disordered former congressman, George Santos, serving as another of Timpf's guests. After President Trump commuted his federal prison sentence, he of course became a semi-regular Gutfeld! guest.)

The Fox News Channel pretends that Gutfeld! is a comedy show. In reality, it's a very aggressive corporate messaging programa tribal propaganda vehicle which hides behind a comedy veneer.   

The program peddles the most divisive kind of tribal propaganda. Our question would be this:  

What does it mean when people with such peculiar sensibilities are sent out, night after night, to pretend to be conducting news discussions on a very heavily watched American "cable news" show?   

Obviously, there's no such thing as a perfect news discussion. At present, Gutfeld!, like every Fox News program, is pretending to be conducting discussions of some creature called "socialism."

There's no such thing as a perfect news show. But what might a sensible person say about a primetime "cable news" program like this?

CRAZY/PRESUMABLY DANGEROUS: Strait talk from the commander in chief!

TUESDAY, AUGUST 18, 2026

Silence from the press: How good a film was Crazy/Beautiful? We can't say we remember. 

It had been mentioned to us (as the director's predecessor to Blue Crush) by [WE NO LONGER MENTION NAMES], a film critic for the Washington Post and a good and decent person. 

It was "an unusually observant film about adolescence," Roger Ebert said in his three-star review. Having said that, whatever!

As we noted yesterday, we thought of the film's unusual title when we read Mediaite's account of what Senator Cassidy told Jake Tapper this weekend.   

On Sunday, Cassidy had appeared on CNN's State of the Union. This exchange had occurred:  

TAPPER (8/16/26): President Trump also claimed that the combined MMR vaccine could be, quote, "quite lethal." He referred to it as sort of like a nuclear weapon. 

He said he's seen proof that the size of combined vaccines are comparable to what he called a bottle of soda, a large vat, or what seemingly looks like gallons being pumped into a child's body.

You said someone needs to stand up to, quote, "crazy/stupid things being said that undermine faith in immunization," unquote. Is President Trump saying some of these, quote, "crazy/stupid things?"

CASSIDY: Yes. That's a crazy/stupid thing.   

We've replaced the comma with a slash. Cassidy spoke of statements about an important vaccine which were "crazy/stupid."  

At this site, we prefer to avoid the insulting term "stupid." For obvious reasons, we'd also avoid the colloquial term "crazy" when real issues of possible mental illness seemed to be involved.   

That said, the nation continues to drive at high speed toward a cliff, with its journalists refusing to report or discuss what seems to be right there before them. 

We've run out of things to say about that unyielding silence on the part of the upper-end press corps. But as for the president, we learn today that the world has now been gifted with this:   

Trump Declares Strait of Hormuz as ‘NEW US Territory’ in Bonkers Truth Social Post   

President Donald Trump proclaimed on Tuesday that the Strait of Hormuz is a “new U.S. territory,” as the war in Iran nears the six-month mark.

An image shared to Trump’s Truth Social account showed the crucial waterway and strategic oil pipeline circled on a map and emblazoned with the words “NEW U.S. Territory.”  

Tom Durante's report for Mediaite continues from there. To visit the president's Truth Social post, you can just click this

Over at Mediaite, the headline writer went with the jangly term "bonkers." We'd describe the president's declaration as HIGHLY DISTURBING / PRESUMABLY VERY DANGEROUS. 

We repeat the point we've made before. The president will remain in office for more than two years after November's elections. There's no way of knowing what he might decide to do in those two-plus years.   

The silence continues within the press. They simply won't tell you about it.

As frequently noted: We regard a severe mental illness as an actual illness. We regard any such illness as a tragic human event.


MONDAY: Has anyone ever explained that flight?

MONDAY, AUGUST 17, 2026

Ossoff gets it right: Has anyone ever explained the tolling of the bell which seemed to occur when President Trump snuck off one plane out of Turkey, finding his way to another?   

Was actual danger involved? If not, why did the president subject himself to potential ridicule by sneaking away on a catering truck? 

If so, what the bell explains the trio of apparently minor aides who accompanied him on his flight, with Rubio, Bessent and Miller all left on the doomed jetliner. along with much of the press? 

Speaking of the press, has anyone ever tried to explain the call of the roll on those flights? Hegseth yes, Rubio no? What was up with that?

At any rate, executive assistant Natalie Harp was one of the intended survivors. According to the Wall Street Journal, Harp "plays an integral role in Trump’s Truth Social activity." She frequently "logs onto the president’s account—at times outside of normal work hours—and posts batches of Trump-approved messages," the Journal reported in May

Yesterday, Jon OssoffFox has him up by 13 in Georgiaelectrified Blue America with an angry insinuation about the president and Harp. 

For an initial report by Mediaite, you can just click here. We'll suggest that you look at the videotape of Ossoff's remarks. As shown, his angry presentation starts like this:

OSSOFF (8/16/26): There's something uniquely despicable about lying a nation into war. Treating citizens as fools, and those who serve as pawns.

Aboard the U.S.S. Abraham Lincoln, they've now been at sea for 240-plus days without a port call. It's a Navy record. And still—and still

And still, they serve with excellence. 

And still, they serve with excellence! God bless the sailors, Marines, aviators and all aboard the United States Ship Abraham Lincoln. 

AUDIENCE: Cheers 

His insinuation came after that. We're not saying it was wrong.   

But first, he remembered to praise the men and women who serve. He had us as a very major force right there, when he (very convincingly) did that.

A favorite quote: A favorite quote from My Antonia:

"Ain't it wonderful, Jim, how much people can mean to each other?"


CRAZY/NOT SO BEAUTIFUL: There the president went again!

MONDAY, AUGUST 17, 2026

On horseback with General Washington: By now, it's a regular weekend event, and who really knows? It may be intended to draw attention away from everything else!

At any rate, there the president(s) went again! On Truth Social, you could see our nation's father(s) on horseback:

Trump Rides Horses With George Washington and Floats Big 2028 ‘Win’ in AI Posting Spree

President Donald Trump went on a bit of a posting spree on Saturday afternoon, with the flurry including the president posting multiple AI pictures of himself alongside George Washington. Trump also trotted out one of his go-to troll moves by hinting he will win the 2028 election—a claim which his liberal critics loathe and often point out can’t happen because of the Constitution.

The report by Sean James continues from there, with a trio of pictures included. One picture shows the sitting president back in the saddle again, riding next to General Washington.

This has become standard weekend fare. Who knows? It may be intended to draw attention away from headlines like this headline concerning the latest crazy presidential conduct concerning a major policy issue:

GOP Senator Absolutely Destroys Trump’s Recent Comments Casting Doubt on Vaccines: ‘That’s a Crazy, Stupid Thing!’

A Republican Senator is lashing out at President Donald Trump over his recent claim that “nothing bad can happen” by splitting up the childhood vaccine schedule.

Appearing on CNN’s State of the Union Sunday, Sen. Bill Cassidy (R-LA) ripped the president for comments made during an executive order signing Tuesday in which he said he wants to split the MMR measles, mumps and rubella vaccine into separate shots. Despite vehement objections from top physician organizations, Trump falsely claimed the combined MMR shot could be “quite lethal,” and added that “separately, it looks like they are not at all lethal.”

[...]

“You’ve said someone needs to stand up to ‘crazy, stupid things’ being said that undermine faith and immunization,” Tapper told Cassidy. “Is President Trump saying some of these crazy stupid things?”

“Yeah,” Cassidy said. “That’s a crazy, stupid thing!”

Way back in 2001, Crazy/Beautiful was a generally well-regarded film about teen culture. This past week, we moved on to "Crazy/Stupid" in the realm of child health care as a pair of men with fairly obvious mental health issues pushed their peculiar beliefs and ludicrous claims on a rapidly failing nation.

It was "Crazy/Stupid," Cassidy said, finally finding his voice. Of course, he was hardly the first observer to express that general view.

Earlier in the week, the editorial board of the Washington Post had described Trump's claims about the MMR vaccine as "irresponsible, possibly deadly." Live and direct from Murdoch World, the editorial board at the Wall Street Journal had offered this:

Trump Jabs at Vaccines for Children

The U.S. is enduring its worst measles outbreak in years, but that isn’t stopping President Trump from spreading vaccine skepticism. He overruled his advisers, press reports say, by issuing Monday’s executive order urging Health and Human Services Secretary RFK Jr. to limit proven childhood immunizations.

The President’s declaration of “Gold Standard Childhood Vaccine Recommendations” largely follows a much-disputed HHS report in January that advised fewer vaccines on the childhood schedule. Mr. Trump likes to paint a golden sheen on everything, but his proposed regimen isn’t based on rigorous science, or really any science at all.

[...]

The order also proposes splitting the MMR into “three separate single-disease shots,” to be administered at separate medical visits. Mr. Trump claimed without evidence Monday that the MMR vaccine in its current form could be “quite lethal.” Is he trying to scare parents into not inoculating children?

And so on from there.

The New York Times has largely taken itself out of the editorial business. That said, the Times provided these punishing fact-check pieces:

Fact-Checking the Trump Administration’s Claims About Vaccines

President Trump signed an executive order on Monday calling for scaling back the number of vaccinations American children receive. At an Oval Office event announcing the order, Mr. Trump suggested falsely that vaccines were linked to autism and that the combined measles, mumps and rubella shot could be lethal, among other claims.

While it is not clear yet whether the order has any legal power, experts said they were concerned that the statements from Mr. Trump, Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and others at the event would sow further doubt and confusion about the safety of immunizations. 
(For full report, click here.)

Should the M.M.R. Vaccine Be Split Into Three Separate Shots?

[...]

In an Oval Office signing ceremony, the president made a frightening and unsubstantiated claim about the combination shot. “Together, there could be a possibility they’re quite lethal.”

Researchers have not linked the combination M.M.R. shot to a risk of death, and there is no evidence that it is dangerous or that splitting it into its three components is any safer or more effective, vaccine experts said. Combination shots for the diseases have been used in the United States since 1971, and were introduced only after careful comparison against individual shots. They have been given to hundreds of millions of children.

What’s more, separate vaccines for measles, mumps or rubella have not been available in the United States for many years. Vaccine manufacturers said it would take a minimum of five to 10 years for them to be tested and made available.

[...]

“It’s just simply more confusion for the poor parents,” Dr. Edwards said. “And it’s just showing the world that our health system and our H.H.S. and our president are totally uninformed,” she said, referring to the Department of Health and Human Services.   
(For full report, click this.)   

We don't like to use the word "stupid" here. That said, how "Crazy/Not So Beautiful" were the Trump/Kennedy remarks?

Major news orgs don't like to report the astonishing size of the president's apparent mental / cognitive disorder. You may have to go to a site like Mediaite to get a report like this:

Trump Compares Common Vaccine to a Nuclear Weapon

President Donald Trump compared the Measles, Mumps, and Rubella vaccine to a nuclear bomb being set off inside a kid’s body during a Tuesday interview on Real America’s Voice.

The president championed the new childhood vaccine guidelines he and HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. debuted Monday, with Trump claiming the old schedule was “too big” and “too much” at one time. He then talked about the MMR vaccine.

“If you give them separately — the M, the M, and the R, it’s fine,” Trump said. “When you put them together, they’re sort of like a nuclear weapon, according to some. So why wouldn’t you give them separately? What’s hurt by giving them separately?”

 [...]

Trump told Root the government had previously recommended “pumping this massive amount of fluid” into kids which looked “like a Coca-Cola bottle.”

“I don’t care if it’s water, it’s too much,” Trump said. 

According to the sitting president, an amount of vaccine "like a Coca-Cola bottle" is currently being pumped into each child's arm. The shots are "sort of like a nuclear weapon," he added. 

What was the source for these remarkable claims? What else? His source was "according to some!"

The lunacy of the president's claims might almost seem to suggest the possibility of a major cognitive problem. In our view, a different set of mental disorders is put on display by the major news orgs which still refuse to report and discuss the obvious fact that something seems to be wrong with this manwith a man who will remain in office, surrounded by his nut-ball staff, for more than two years even after the mid-term elections.

Is something wrong with President Trump? It's pretty much as you like it! Speaking on Long Island on Friday, there he (not so beautifully) went again:

Trump Boasts ‘Young Beautiful Girls’ Come to White House to Thank Him for Lowering Crime

President Donald Trump repeatedly boasted Friday that “young beautiful girls” have been showing up at the White House to thank him for lowering crime.

The cringeworthy comment came as Trump spoke to law enforcement officials on Long Island while touting his administration’s crime record...   

[...]

“These young, beautiful girls, these young, beautiful girls, these young, beautiful girls in the White House,” the president repeated. “You know, they come in. Now, I’m not supposed to say ‘beautiful,’ but what the hell?

“These young, these gorgeous, beautiful girls, they’re young. They wanna be safe, and they come, ‘Mr. President, may I speak to you?'”

“Yes,” Trump said, referring to how he responds to these “young beautiful girls.”

“Thank you, sir! Thank you!” the president recalls them saying. “I said, ‘Why are you thanking me?’ ‘Because a year and a half ago, I was afraid to leave—I was afraid to open the door of my apartment, and now I walk to the White House every morning, and I have absolutely no— Thank you, sir!'” 

There the president (not so beautifully) seems to have gone again! Is it possible that something's wrong with this rather powerful guy? 

At this point, we're barely scratching the surface here of the points of concern which may get swept away by AI pictures of the commander in chief riding along, on a charger, next to General Washington. But, for whatever reason, our major orgs in Blue America are going to duck the question of mental illness / cognitive decline "until the last dog dies."

That said, Blue America is also struggling as we start our week of reports. 

"Woke One was crazy," AOC said. What could she have meant by that?  

Tomorrow: We've wondered about this ourselves


SATURDAY: Dems are leading in six states!

SATURDAY, AUGUST 15, 2026

In search of the real Suzanne Scott: In yesterday afternoon's report, we noted the fact that Candidate El-Sayed is behind by four points in Michigan, according to a new survey by the Fox News polling unit.

Sherrod Brown is ahead by eight in Ohio, we noted, also according to Fox.

We're concerned about Michigan, where "prickly" is unlikely to win (or so it seems to us). That said, we thought you should hear the rest of the story, at least as told by Jessica Tarlov yesterday on The Five.   

Her presentation starts here. After saying that El-Sayed will be hurt by his association with Hasan Piker, she went ahead and said this:   

TARLOV (8/14/26): [El-Sayed] is trailing Mike Rogers by four points. And I understand why Republicans want to look to that facet of the Fox poll, because everything else is a disaster for Republicans, except the Michigan race. 

You have Ossoff up 13, Cooper up 9, Brown up 8, Turek up 4, Talarico up 3, and Jackson up 2, and then El-Sayed trailing by 4, so there is definitely work to do.    

So Tarlov said. She was referring to Democratic Party leads by these Senate candidates in these six states, according to Fox polls:  

Jon Ossoff in Georgia (+13) 
Roy Cooper in North Carolina (+9)
Sherrod Brown in Ohio (+8)
Josh Turek in Iowa (+4)
James Talarico in Texas (+3)
Troy Jackson in Maine (+2)  

Is that a disaster for Republicans? Not necessarily, no. 

Will those leads hold up in the end? We have no idea. 

That said, our nation is in a world of extremely serious hurt, and Blue America's largest news orgs (and best-known journalists) just keep playing it safejust keep averting their gaze.  

For reasons too depressing to state, we don't think a "prickly" approach will work for Candidate El-Sayed. With respect to life at the bottom of the barrel, consider the way El-Sayed is being portrayed by the droogs of the Fox News Channel as our Blue stars look away.

Gutfeld! is the third most-watched program in American "cable news." Its viewership more than doubles that of corresponding shows on MS NOW, with CNN's viewership lagging behind even that.  

Gutfeld! is a corporate messaging vehicle being misidentified as a "late night comedy" program. (It airs at 7 p.m. in the west!) Last night, in his handful of opening jokes, its host hit these favorite themes:   

Rosie O'Donnell is too fat
Michelle Obama is too big and too strong  
Something's wrong with Nancy Pelosi's face   
Hillary Clinton likes to kill people 

A certain pattern may seem to obtain. Along the way, he included this messaging moment with respect to El-Sayed: 

GUTFELD (8/14/26): You know, the Internet was amused over Abdul El-Sayed's Blue's Clues parody video. 

[Brief excerpt from El-Sayed video] 

Except the part where he stones Dora the Explorer to death for traveling alone.  

AUDIENCE: [General puzzlement]   

(Blue's Clues? What's that? Just click here.)

Understandably, the audience seemed a bit bewildered by that rather obscure presentation. That said, this was meant to deliver the message that El-Sayed is a violent "Muslim extremist" who would stone a little girl to death if she dared to venture out alone. 

This sort of sickness is now standard fare on this inexcusable "cable news" program. As people like Jeff Greenfield refuse to notice, the program's host is constantly suggesting that, just as Hillary Clinton likes to kill people, Mayor Mamdani and Candidate El-Sayed like to fly planes into the side of buildings or, in this particular case, are inclined to stone people to death.

This is ugly, prehistoric fare. CEO Suzanne Scott is now paying this man to do this sort of thing on a nightly basis. 

None of Blue America's news orgs are willing to report the fact that Suzanne Scott is doing this. No one is willing to ask her why she would do such a thing. 

This is ugly behavior of an undisguised, unmistakable kind. As our nation continues to slide toward the sea, the point of this conduct is obvious.

The point of this ugly conduct is obvious. Maddow and French and all the stars are all averting their gaze.


FRIDAY: Like every poll, it's only one poll!

FRIDAY, AUGUST 14, 2026

But here's what this one poll says: As with any poll, it's just one poll. Still, here's what this new poll has said:  

...New Fox News Poll Sounds Alarm Bells In Michigan For Democrats   

A new set of Fox News polls set of alarm bells for Democrats in Michigan’s key Senate race this week, while also highlighting how Republicans could lose their majority in the chamber.

“Tonight we have the first look at new Fox polling. The battle for Senate control in the midterms is leading to nationwide attention on really only a handful of races across the country that could decide the balance of power next year. Of course, Fox’s Alexis McAdams is in New York with a look at the new numbers. Good evening, Alexis,” began Fox’s chief political anchor Bret Baier on Thursday night.

“Bret, good evening. So, according to a brand new Fox News poll, Republicans have a slight edge in Michigan, in one of the most expensive and competitive Senate races in the country. So tonight, Republican Mike Rogers has 51 percent of the vote, and far-left Democrat Abdul El-Sayed has 47 percent. So Rogers has a four-point edge, which is still within the poll’s margin of error among Michigan’s registered voters,” McAdams reported.  

Oof! That four-point lead for Candidate Rogers suggests only "a slight edge," McAdams politely (and correctly) reported. Still, Democrats pretty much need to win that seatand this morning, we ourselves said this:   

"[Candidate El-Sayed] delivered a prickly response to the president's ugly insults. Assuming he wants to win in November, that struck us as possibly the wrong way to go, though of course there's no way to be certain."   

We Blues! Why would a prickly response possibly be the wrong way to go? The wrong way to go if you're trying to win the seat, that is?   

You're asking an excellent questionthough for now, we must hurry off, with McAdams noting El-Sayed's prickly suggestion that he and Rogers should stage "a tackle football showdown." 

Every poll is only one poll, but we aren't thrilled with that one poll. That said, Candidate Brown is ahead by eight points in Ohio, McAdams also says. 

(Fox News polls have largely been respectable polls, down through the many long years.)


NEW ARRIVALS: The furious streamer came fighting back!

FRIDAY, AUGUST 14, 2026

We won't repost what he said: Judged by any normal standard, last week's "new arrival on the front" is no one's idea of a joke.   

That new arrival was Abdul El-Sayed, the Democratic Party's Senate nominee in Michigan. There's a lot to look at, so here we go. Fellow citizens, just try to hang on:  

Abdul El-Sayed 

Abdulrahman Mohamed El-Sayed (born October 31, 1984), known as Abdul El-Sayed, is an American politician and epidemiologist who is the Democratic nominee in the 2026 United States Senate election in Michigan.

A progressive Democrat, El-Sayed supports regulated capitalism, Medicare for All, ceasing US military funding to Israel, and abolishing ICE. He ran for governor in 2018, placing second to Gretchen Whitmer in the Democratic primary.

He served as the director of the Department of Health, Human, and Veterans Services of Wayne County from 2023 to 2025. From 2015 to 2017, he was the executive director of the City of Detroit Health Department, where he oversaw public health initiatives during the city’s recovery from bankruptcy. A graduate of the University of Michigan and a Rhodes Scholar at Oriel College, Oxford, El-Sayed holds a Doctor of Medicine from Columbia University, where he was an assistant professor of epidemiology.

That's where the leading authority starts. Continuing, that source also tells us this:  

El-Sayed was born in the Detroit suburb of Rochester Hills to Egyptian immigrant parents. His father, Mohamed, was raised in Alexandria, Egypt, and immigrated to the U.S. to pursue a PhD at Wayne State University. His mother, Fatten Elkomy, is a nurse practitioner in Missouri. Abdul was raised in the Detroit area by his father and stepmother Jacqueline (a native of Gratiot County, Michigan), both of whom are engineers.

El-Sayed graduated from Bloomfield Hills Andover High School, where he was a team captain for wrestling, football and lacrosse in 2003. He then attended the University of Michigan, where he majored in biology and political science...He graduated Phi Beta Kappa with Highest Distinction in 2007 with a bachelor's degree and delivered that year's commencement speech.  

[...]   

As a second-year medical student, he received a Rhodes Scholarship to attend Oriel College, Oxford, where he completed a D.Phil. in public health in 2011. In 2014, he completed a Doctor of Medicine (M.D.) degree at the Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons...El-Sayed did not pursue a medical license and instead went into public health epidemiology work.

There once was a time when a resume of that type might inspire grudging respect. In the madness of the present day, El-Sayed's win last week produced ugly pushback from President Trump, along with a flurry of commentary on the Fox News Channel in which the children complained that he refers to himself as a "physician" when he should really just say he's a "doctor."   

(No, we aren't making that up.)

Will Candidate El-Sayed win November's general election? We have no idea. 

He delivered a prickly response to the president's ugly insults. Assuming he wants to win in November, that struck us as possibly the wrong way to go, though of course there's no way to be certain. 

And then there's the fact he has campaigned with Hasan Piker, another of this year's "new arrivals." The nominee has even suggested that he might do so again. 

Would that tilt the vote more Red or more Blue? Would it change any votes at all?

We can't actually tell you that! We can say that Piker arrives on the front with a rather high profile, in part for reasons the leading authority summarizes here:   

Hasan Piker   

Hasan DoÄŸan Piker (born July 25, 1991) is an American Twitch streamer, influencer, and left-wing political commentator. His livestreams usually include discussions on current affairs and lifestyle stories, playing video games, reacting to memes and media clips, and interacting with his viewers.

As of 2026, Piker's Twitch channel ranks among the platform's most-subscribed. Piker has been called one of the biggest voices on the American Left...He has regularly spoken about the Gaza war, advocating for Palestinians and criticizing the Israeli government. 

[...] 

In May 2024, Piker described allegations of Hamas carrying out sexual violence during the October 7 attacks as "rape fantasies" and "rape hallucinations." Piker has also said, "It doesn't matter if rape happened on October 7th. It doesn't change the dynamic for me." 

In an April 2026 interview with The New Republic, Piker said of the quotation: "I think it's very clear what I was saying. I was debating someone at the time about there being sexual violence that occurred on October 7th. And I said sexual violence does take place in situations like this, and there was definitely testimony of sexual violence that had taken place amongst the hostages. But that doesn't change the dynamic of Israel committing a genocide against the Palestinians, and my opposing that genocide."

And so on from there, at substantial length, as you can see for yourself. Now for the rest of the story:

This Monday, Joe Scarborough voiced concern about the possibility that Democrats might be snatching election defeat from the jaws of victory at the present time. At Mediaite, David Gilmour presented a lengthy account of Scarborough's "fiery, must-watch rant." 

Gilmour presented transcript and tape of the "fiery rant." You can just click here

At that time, it still seemed likely that new arrival Francesca Hong was going to win in Wisconsin. In Scarborough's view, mainstream Democrats were failing to separate themselves from the less presentable views of such DSA / lefty types. 

As we showed you yesterday, Scarborough eventually said what you see below. Though he never said his name, he was plainly referring to Piker in this part of his fiery plea:

SCARBOROUGH (8/10/26): There's nothing wrong with the Democrats supporting economic justice. There's nothing wrong with the Democrats supporting...getting rid of the Trump taxes and making billionaires pay more in taxes. 

That’s a legitimate mainstream debate for people to have. "Healthcare for all! Healthcare is unaffordable!" That is something most Americans would agree with. 

But please, I don’t need people telling me, "Oh, you have to just turn a blind eye to people saying that women getting raped on October 7 didn’t matter in the grand scheme of things." No, Americans aren’t going to support that!   

Plainly, he was referring to Piker's famous statement about October 7. Later that day, Piker came pushing back, going on and on, at endless length, in a way we won't repost or transcribe.   

You can read what Piker said by clicking for Gilmour's follow-up report. Also, you can listen to what Piker said by clicking that link. 

(In our view, a fair amount of what Piker said that day was inaccurate.)

According to the leading authority, Piker seems to have become relatively wealthy providing content of that general type. "In 2021, he bought a $2.7 million house in West Hollywood," the leading authority says.

People also get wealthy on the Fox News Channel! But can the American project, such as it has been, really expect to survive a discourse of this type?   

The so-called "democratization of media" has created a new way of life. With apologies to Huey Long, our nation now runs on this rocket fuel:   

Every streamer a king!

To borrow from the early Dylan, in one of his most painful songs:   

But oh, what kind of democratization is this, which goes from bad to worse?

More on the composition: Yes, the song is called Tears of Rage. In the present day, our culture is running on the rage, perhaps in the absence of tears.


THURSDAY: Pharaoh's name to be restored...

THURSDAY, AUGUST 13, 2026

...to the walls of The Whathisname Center: Kurt Andersen's essay appears today in print editions of the New York Times. 

As we've noted, it starts with an ominous-sounding, fairly recent observation from the late Rush Limbaugh:

Has America Already Undergone a Soft Breakup?

“I actually think,” Rush Limbaugh told his many millions of listeners during the weeks between Donald Trump losing the 2020 election and his supporters’ assault on the Capitol, “that we’re trending toward secession. It can’t go on this way. There cannot be a peaceful coexistence of two completely different theories of life, theories of government, theories of how we manage our affairs.” 

It can't go on this way? Given this struggling nation's "two different theories of [everything]," we're trending toward secession? 

We can't say that Limbaugh's basic perception was wrong. 

In the past, we ourselves have spoken of a "silent secession" by elements within the Red States. As Andersen's essay continues, he talks about a "soft secession" being practiced by attorney generals of the Blue Statesand that phrase is being employed by those Blue State officials themselves, to describe their own activities!   

As he continues, Andersen comes up with some somewhat silly-sounding ways to deal with the fact that we've become two different epistemic entities. Here's one example:

We can’t keep going this way. Escaping federal dysfunction and avoiding real hostilities over the long term will require some kind of radical shift. Perhaps states and regions could become much more independent. Like the regional autonomous communities in Spain, some of which collect nearly all the taxes their inhabitants pay and then forward a negotiated share to the national government. Or the cantons of Switzerland, which can divide or reconfigure, and each one decides whether newcomers become Swiss citizens.   

As Andersen starts, he's agreeing with Limbaugh there:  

We can’t keep going this way, he says. We need to come together long enough to agree to be more like Spain, or perhaps to let ourselves function more like the shapeshifting cantons of Switzerland.   

Could some such radical shift occur? It seems a bit hard to believe, but in theory, everything's possible. 

("Isn't it pretty to think so?" That's what Hemingway famously wrote, concerning something completely different, at the end of The Sun Also Rises. Recalling President Obama's claim that we're really just the United States, Andersen has borrowed the famous line just one paragraph earlier!)

Can the United States be more like Spain? It's hard to answer that question, but we thought of Limbaugh's "two different theories of [everything]" when we perused this bit of breaking warfare online at the New York Times:   

Kennedy Center Board Decides to Inscribe Trump’s Name on Building   

The board of the John F. Kennedy Center for the Performing Arts voted on Thursday to inscribe President Trump’s name on the building beneath the main signage, aggressively testing a federal judge’s order to remove it, according to two people with direct knowledge of the proceedings.

According to the resolution approved by the Trump-allied board, the inscription underneath the institution’s name would read: “Restored and Renovated by President Donald J. Trump.” The board’s decision came shortly after it voted to move forward with Mr. Trump’s plan to shutter the building for renovations.

The president’s name was added to the building last year, but the judge ordered the letters taken down, finding that only Congress had the authority to change the institution’s name. The center removed Mr. Trump’s name in June but is appealing the ruling.

In Thursday’s resolution, the board directed officials to undertake “all legal means” to honor Mr. Trump for bringing the center back “from the brink of disaster.”  

Are the AGs of Blue America engaged in some sort of "soft secession?" We aren't sure, but potent elements of Red America are looking for ways to pick fights about attributions and intimations of greatness in every conceivable sphere.

Andersen's soft headline notwithstanding, this never-ending attack on the priorsthis ongoing attempted "reinvention [of everything]"is well underway at this time. 

Potent chunks of Red America are trying to make their pharaoh live forever. Warning:

Over here, in Blue America, we may have our foibles too.


NEW ARRIVALS: Hong came and went as a new arrival!

THURSDAY, AUGUST 13, 2026

Hasan Piker remains: Based on her lead in the polls, the new arrival on the front was supposed to be Francesca Hong.  It was thought that she would be the Democratic Party's nominee for governor of Wisconsin. 

In this passage from a profile in The Atlantic, Helen Lewis starts to explain why that didn't happen. Dual headline included:

AOC Knows a Lemon When She Sees One   
Francesca Hong’s surprise loss in Wisconsin is a blessing to the Democratic Party.

[...]  

Hong’s loss yesterday was unexpected. Two weeks ago, the 37-year-old state legislator was the front-runner in the polls, largely because the Democratic primary had turned into a clown show... [O]ne poll had Hong 22 points ahead. In the interim, another candidate, Milwaukee County Executive David Crowley, had returned to the race after previously withdrawing because of a lack of momentum. All the hopes of the Democratic establishment rested on Crowley’s Hail Mary pass.

Why were they so scared of Hong? Partially because she is a member of the Democratic Socialists of America, an organization that calls for public ownership of large corporations, looser immigration laws, and the abolition of prisons. Hong has said that she does not agree with all of the DSA platform, but she entered the contest with an unscrubbed Twitter account, full of the most voter-repelling, peak-2020 statements you can imagine. 

At this site, we wouldn't be inclined to refer to Hong as a "lemon." On Election Day, we saw videotape of her taking questions from reporters, then walking away holding hands with her 10-year-old son.   

Years from now, that child may be lucky enough to feel that he was raised by the world's best mother. But his mother was deeply challenged as a candidate under prevailing rules of the game, according to which you run for office in order to serve, and to be allowed to serve you have to win a plurality of votes in a full-scale November election.   

Judged by any reasonable calculus, Hong was a shaky bet to win in November. As her profile ends, Lewis explains why David Crowley's surprising win this Tuesday was seen, by establishment pols, as "a blessing to the Democratic Party:"    

Crowley squeaked past Hong at the last minute. That is a nightmare for the Republicans, whose candidate Tom Tiffany was the only serious contender for the party’s nomination. In Congress, he is a member of the hard-right Freedom Caucus and voted against certifying Joe Biden’s victory in 2020. He has been heartily endorsed by Donald Trump—great for the primary, but worse than useless in the general.

Tiffany very obviously wanted to run against Hong, whom he could have painted as a dangerous radical who loves illegal immigration and hates cranberry sauce... 

The final winner, however, is democracy itself. Who would bet against Donald Trump calling up swing-state officials in 2028 and asking them to find a few more votes for the Republican candidate for president? After all, that’s exactly what he did in Georgia in 2020. Joe Biden won Wisconsin by just 21,000 votes that year, while Trump took it back by only 30,000 in the next race. For a decade, Trump and his allies have counted on Democrats to sound so out of step with mainstream voters on cultural issues that even his most authoritarian moves look tolerable by comparison. The Badger State is one of the most crucial places on the electoral map. Francesca Hong’s unexpected loss is America’s gain.  

We live in a time of madness and rage (and in a time of mental illness). Who will end up in Wisconsin's state house? Given the madness of the time, a great deal may turn on that question.  

Or then again, possibly not! Those of us in Blue America have shown the ability to find ways to occasion our own defeats. The current president squeaked into the White House for his current term in part because of the conduct in which we Blues engaged along the way, the earlier Hong included.

Among other self-inflicted disasters, the Biden administration's open border and our less digestible "Woke One" claims were able to drive a certain number of voters away from Candidate Harris. Enough voters were driven away so that someone as unpopular as Candidate Trump was able to make his way back to what's now left of the White House.

And now, along comes the latest new arrival, one who sounded off at the start of this very week. Rightly or wrongly, Republican strategists love this arrival. The leading authority starts its profile as shown:   

Hasan Piker   

Hasan DoÄŸan Piker (born July 25, 1991) is an American Twitch streamer, influencer, and left-wing political commentator. His livestreams usually include discussions on current affairs and lifestyle stories, playing video games, reacting to memes and media clips, and interacting with his viewers.

As of 2026, Piker's Twitch channel ranks among the platform's most-subscribed. Piker has been called one of the biggest voices on the American Left. He began streaming on Twitch in March 2018, while working at The Young Turks (TYT). In January 2020, Piker left TYT to focus on his career as a Twitch streamer. He has regularly spoken about the Gaza war, advocating for Palestinians and criticizing the Israeli government. 

Piker was born in New Brunswick, New Jersey, to Turkish parents. He grew up in Istanbul and was raised as a Muslim...His father, Mehmet Behçet Piker, is a political scientist and economist who was a board member and vice president of the Turkish financial conglomerate Sabancı Holding and is a founding member of Turkey's conservative Future Party. His mother, Ülker Sedef Piker (née Uygur), is an art and architectural historian who teaches at the New Jersey Institute of Technology...

Piker returned to the United States and attended the University of Miami, then transferred to Rutgers University, where he joined the Theta Delta Chi fraternity. In 2013, he graduated cum laude from Rutgers with a double major in political science and communication studies.

And so on from there. We'll start by stating the obvious:   

There's a great deal a person might criticize about the current Israeli governmentabout its conduct of "the Gaza war," about its excruciating behavior in the West Bank. 

There's a great deal a person might say about the ongoing plight of that region's Palestinians.

It seems to us that major American news orgs tend to shy away from coverage of the conduct in question. That said, we aren't specialists on such mattersand opinions, which are often ardently held, will differ on such matters among citizens of this country.

That said, Piker has become a favorite of the Fox News Channel because of some of the ways he has expressed his views and opinions. Correctly or otherwise, that channel sees him as someone whose aggressive rhetoric will tend to affect votes in a way which tilts more Red than Blue.

Joe Scarborough seems to hold a similar view. On Monday, he criticized the mainstream Democratic Party for failing to disassociate itself from vote-killing rhetoric of the farther left. Without ever naming Piker, he seemed to refer to something Piker once said when he offered this:   

SCARBOROUGH (8/10/26): There's nothing wrong with the Democrats supporting economic justice. There's nothing wrong with the Democrats supporting...getting rid of the Trump taxes and making billionaires pay more in taxes. 

That’s a legitimate mainstream debate for people to have. "Healthcare for all! Healthcare is unaffordable!" That is something most Americans would agree with.

But please, I don’t need people telling me, "Oh, you have to just turn a blind eye to people saying that women getting raped on October 7 didn’t matter in the grand scheme of things." No, Americans aren’t going to support that!

Women getting raped on October 7 don’t matter in the grand scheme of things? 

Almost surely, that was a reference to something Piker once said. Later, he created a case to justify, defend or explain what he had said. 

Without ever saying his name, Scarborough had presumably been referring to Piker. On Monday, the streamer responded at length.

Tomorrow, we'll show you what Piker said. He's an important new arrival. For citizens of Blue America, there's a great to think about here.

Tomorrow: Piker's arrival