Tommy Vietor gets it right on the Benghazi attack!

THURSDAY, MAY 16, 2013

With just one basic correction: Yesterday, the White House released a pile of the e-mails which created the talking-points on Benghazi.

Also yesterday, Tommy Vietor published his thoughts about the whole talking points flap. Until recently, Vietor was spokesman for the National Security Council.

While in that position, he helped create the now famous talking points.

It seems to us that yesterday’s events have made a few blindingly obvious points just that much more clear.

Comprehension often involves repetition. With that in mind, let’s briefly return to a few basic points about those talking points.

Once again, this is the way the CIA’s original proposal began. If we have eyes to see, two obvious facts will leap out at us from this document:
ORIGINAL CIA TALKING POINTS (9/14/12): We believe based on currently available information that the attacks in Benghazi were spontaneously inspired by the protests at the U.S. Embassy in Cairo and evolved into a direct assault against the U.S. Consulate and subsequently its annex.

The crowd almost certainly was a mix of individuals from across many sectors of Libyan society. That being said, we do know that Islamic extremists with ties to al-Qa’ida participated in the attack.

Initial press reporting linked the attack to Ansar al-Sharia. The group has since released a statement that its leadership did not order the attacks, but it did not deny that some of its members were involved.
First important fact: The CIA was the source for the claim that the Benghazi attack was “spontaneously inspired by the protests at the U.S. Embassy in Cairo.”

Susan Rice has been crucified for reporting this “current best assessment.” Endless suggestions have been made that she or somebody else made this up.

In fact, this claim came straight from the CIA. It seems to be what they thought at the time.

This fact has been clear since last Friday, when the original version of the talking points was released. But even last night, a gang of star liberals couldn’t manage to state this fact on Hardball. (More on that gong-show tomorrow.)

Wagner, Fineman, Corn and the rest? It’s time for this whole gang to go.

Second important fact: As of September 16, the U.S. government didn’t know who had staged this attack.

The most remarkable part of those proposed talking points was the attribution of that claim about Ansar al-Sharia to “initial press reporting.” Who could have read that document without being struck by the oddness of this statement:

“Initial press reporting linked the attack to Ansar al-Sharia!” Who wouldn’t see the obvious oddness of that statement by the CIA?

Answer: The entire American pundit corps! The entire press corps managed to miss the implication of that statement:

As of September 14-16, the CIA didn’t really know who had staged the attack!

For the record, there’s no reason why they should have known on that early date. When an event of this type takes place, Moses doesn’t descend from a mountain with tablets explaining what happened.

With that in mind, we recommend two chunks from Vietor’s presentation:
VIETOR (5/14/13): Regarding the talking points, it’s not surprising that the entire government would want the chance to look at and edit that language. This was a dynamic situation and new information was constantly flowing in, and different agencies had important concerns that had to be addressed—the State Department had security concerns, the FBI was worried about its investigation, and the CIA had a major, yet still undisclosed, role.

[...]

Some people have understandably asked how we were so wrong about there being a protest. I don’t know. When I was in government, I asked some intelligence officials how it happened. They told me that there were many different strands of information indicating there was a protest, both open source and intelligence based. In fact, a number of news outlets reported there were protests.
Duh. “This was a dynamic situation and new information was constantly flowing in,” Vietor writes. Regarding the alleged demonstration, “there were many different strands of information indicating there was a protest...In fact, a number of news outlets reported there were protests.”

Only a child would assume that the CIA—or Rice, or Obama, or Hillary Clinton—would magically know what had happened as of September 15. Unfortunately, the upper-class “press corps” routinely betrays an unfortunate fact:

They actually do have the minds of children. It’s their most obvious trait.

Last night’s 5 PM hour on Hardball was an egregious example of this problem. We’ll discuss that horrible hour tomorrow. For today, let us say this:

In an event like the Benghazi attack, it’s hard to figure out what happened! Why do “journalists” have so much trouble understanding this obvious fact?

Perhaps the answer is this: Our modern journalists rarely try to figure anything out. More often, they simply invent pleasing stories, complete with invented quotes or embellished paraphrase.

We've told you this since the late 1990s: Our “news” is more often a novel. Silly children invent simple-minded tales which satisfy their need for drama while fitting their dim-witted view of the world. Perhaps because they function this way, they don’t seem to know that it takes a lot of work to assemble real information about an event like Benghazi.

They think Daddy should know right now! On those Sunday programs, Rice kept saying that she was giving a preliminary assessment.

Silly Rice! Being children, the nation’s “journalists” don’t comprehend statements like that.

Vietor made one other remark which we will strongly emphasize. It concerns the disgraceful attacks against Rice:
VIETOR: Looking back, maybe there was a time when tragedies like Benghazi brought our country together, but here we’ve seen the opposite. Susan Rice went on TV and offered the consensus US government view of what we thought happened at that time. For that, she was viciously attacked in deeply personal ways. Members of the Senate called her “incompetent” and suggested she was a liar. That’s outrageous.

Imagine if Susan had gone on TV and offered some personal view of what happened or contradicted the intelligence community? She would’ve been charged with manipulating intelligence. The attacks on her have been gratuitous and unfair, and it’s time we start saying as much.
We’ll only disagree with one point. The “time we start saying as much” arrived a very long time ago. But Lawrence and Rachel and all the ass clowns ran off and hid in the woods.

Liberals should be disgusted with the conduct of everyone at MSNBC, from the horrible showboat Matthews over to the horrible Maddow. That said, the career liberal world has behaved this way for at least the last twenty years.

This conduct has been profoundly immoral. This conduct produced a string of disasters, with deaths all over the world.

If you’ve watched The One True Channel this week, you’ve seen this conduct continue.

31 comments:

  1. "Liberals should be disgusted with the conduct of everyone at MSNBC .... If you've watched The One True Channel this week, you've seen this conduct continue."

    And if I haven't, does that mean I'm not a liberal?

    ReplyDelete
  2. Bob, on Benghazi, you're pushing at an open door. No one outside of the rightwing echo chamber gives a shit about Benghazi. The public has written it off as a tragedy and fog-of-war situation. No one is buying into GOP talking points. No. One. Cares.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. You're wrong to say that no one buys the GOP talking points. The truth is that a significant number of people absorb whatever the voice of authority tells them is important or happening in the world. The attention of most people is on the detail of their personal lives and careers. Whether they care about or understand the intricacies of what actually happened in Benghazi, is not the relevant question. We tend to care about what we're told to care about, and when this situation is referred to repeatedly as an example of executive misconduct, many people will see it as such.

      Delete
  3. "If you’ve watched The One True Channel this week..."

    Sorry, like 99.999999% of America, I didn't get around to watching msnbc this week. I was busy attempting to have a life.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I'm surprised you get around to reading and responding to this blog.

      Delete
  4. Wrong, Geoff. No liberal cares. Any one with any sense DOES care. They care about lies about videos, lies about availability of help, lies about resources, lies about who lied, lies about who did what, when.

    Lies are told in order to cover up the truth. This is a cover up of the highest order. Lies in Watergate were bad, but nobody died. Lies in Benghazi were bad and people died.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Quaker in a BasementMay 16, 2013 at 5:57 PM

      "Lies are told in order to cover up the truth. This is a cover up of the highest order. Lies in Watergate were bad, but nobody died. Lies in Benghazi were bad and people died."

      Could you teach me how to make the fabric of time fold up on itself like that?

      First you say people are lying to cover something up. And then those same lies are responsible for the thing that is being covered up to begin with.

      Better yet, if I give you $5, can you bet it on the winner of the fifth race at Belmont after the race is over?

      Delete
    2. You have to wonder where all this concern was after 9-11, where the lies and incompetence cried out for investigation.

      Delete
    3. You are the one doing the lying. Real black helicopter stuff. You can't even say what was covered up.

      Delete
    4. Lies in Watergate were bad, and I can't tell the difference between a skirmish at a CIA outpost and an attack upon how we elect our nations highest officials.

      Delete
  5. Quaker in a BasementMay 16, 2013 at 5:53 PM

    In regards to cable TV liberals, I'm pretty sure "assclown" is one word, not two.

    ReplyDelete
  6. President Obama strongly defended Rice....months later after the election.

    But according to TDH, Maddow should have been campaigning harder than Obama.

    As far as "magically" knowing stuff, it helps if you have drones. And FBI interviews with witnesses.



    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. No, she should have merely used part of one of her many hours of broadcast time to inform and to set the record straight

      Delete
    2. Talking point when there's no substantive point to be made. This guy has no idea what he is talking about. I guarantee you he doesn't know that Susan Rice expressly told Bob Schieffer that same day there could have been al Qaeda involvement. If he is finding out now for the very first time, he will simply refuse to realize that it destroys everything he thinks he knows about it.

      Delete
  7. I remember seeing Amy Goodman on Chris Hayes's old show one morning alongside the usual coven of Village weirdos. By comparison, she seemed to believe her function was to explain otherwise complicated issues in plain, straightforward language. CH often sounds like a college student hopped up on energy drinks and eager to show off his GRE-prep vocabulary. Too many of his guests, whoever they may be, seem only too eager to bury what little meaning or substance they have to convey under the kind of verbiage that makes the average doctoral dissertation read like "Charlotte's Web." Amy's communication skills are Orwellian in the finest sense: she is as direct and unadorned as Orwell prescribed as necessary for good writing and clear thinking.

    If only they could get Amy to move her excellent show over to Lawrence's spot.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. "CH often sounds like a college student hopped up on energy drinks and eager to show off his GRE-prep vocabulary. "

      LOL! And watch his hands, the gestures he makes are a whole other vocabulary. I would love to see him do a show with his hands tied behind his back, I don't think he could do it.

      Delete
  8. Ambassador Chris Stevens had begun a dialog with the Palestinians while he was in Jerusalem ... Mustn't talk to the enemy ... Next we know, he is murdered. Cui bono? See ... http://www.debbieschlussel.com/54408/plo-terrorists-mourn-amb-chris-stevens-close-friend-who-understood-palestinian-side/

    ReplyDelete
  9. nike shoes, Cheap Jordans,Cheap Jordan Shoes,Cheap Air Max,Cheap Free Run Shoes,nike shoes,nike outlet,nike factory,nike store,nike factory outlet,nike outlet store,cheap nike shoes,nike sneakers, toms outlet, toms outlet,tom shoes,toms shoes outlet,tom shoes,toms wedges,cheap toms,toms.com, air jordan, air jordan,jordan shoes,cheap jordans,air jordans,jordan retro,air jordan shoes,jordans,jordan 11,jordan xx9,jordan 6,new jordans,retro jordans,jordan retro 11,jordan 5,air jordan 11,jordans for sale,jordan 4,jordan 1,jordan future,jordan 3,jordan 12,michael jordan shoes,air jordan retro, cheap jordans, cheap jordans,cheap jordan shoes,cheap jordan,cheap jordans for sale,jordans for cheap,jordan shoes,jordans,air jordan,jordan retro,jordan 11,jordan xx9,jordan 6,new jordans,air jordans,retro jordans,jordan retro 11,jordan 5,air jordan 11,jordans for sale,jordan 4,jordan 1,jordan future,jordan 3,jordan 12,michael jordan shoes,air jordan shoes,air jordan retro, jordan retro, jordan retro,jordan shoes,air jordan,air jordans,retro jordans,air jordan retro,jordans,jordan 11,jordan xx9,jordan 6,new jordans,cheap jordans,jordan retro 11,jordan 5,air jordan 11,jordans for sale,jordan 4,jordan 1,jordan future,jordan 3,jordan 12,michael jordan shoes,air jordan shoes, air max 90, air max 90,nike air max 90,air max 95,air max 2014,air max 2013,air max 1,nike air max,air max,nike air max 2014,airmax,nike air max 2013, air max 95, air max 95,nike air max 95,air max 90,nike air max 90,air max 2013,nike air max,air max,air max 2014,nike air max 2014,airmax,nike air max 2013, nike free 5.0, nike free 5.0, nike free trainer 5.0,nike free run 5.0,free running 2,nike free run,nike free,free running,nike running shoes,nike free trainer,free runs,free run 5.0, omega watches, omega watches,omega watch,replica watches,rolex watches,replica omega watches,rolex,watches for men,watches for women,rolex watches for sale,rolex replica,rolex watch,cartier watches,rolex submariner,fake rolex,rolex replica watches,replica rolex, ralph lauren outlet

    ReplyDelete
  10. ralph lauren outlet,ralph lauren outlet online,polo ralph lauren outlet,polo ralph lauren outlet online,polo ralph lauren,ralph lauren,polo ralph,polo shirts,ralphlauren.com,polo outlet,ralph lauren polo, oakley sunglass, oakley sunglasses,cheap oakley,cheap oakley sunglasses,oakley sunglasses cheap,oakley outlet,oakley sunglasses outlet,oakley vault,oakleys,oakley.com,sunglasses outlet,cheap sunglasses,oakley prescription glasses,fake oakleys,oakley glasses,oakley store,fake oakley,oakley sale,cheap oakleys,discount oakley sunglasses, ray ban sunglasses, Ray Ban Sunglasses,Ray Ban Outlet,Ray Ban Sale,Cheap Ray Bans,Cheap Ray Ban Sunglasses,ray ban sunglasses outlet,ray ban,rayban,ray bans,ray-ban,raybans,ray ban wayfarer,ray-ban sunglasses,raybans.com,rayban sunglasses,cheap ray ban, burberry, burberry,burberry outlet,burberry outlet online,burberry factory outlet,burberry sale,burberry handbags, chanel bags, chanel bags,chanel handbags,chanel sunglasses,chanel outlet,chanel purses,chanel handbags official site, coach outlet store, coach outlet,coach outlet store,coach outlet store online,coach outlet stores,coach factory outlet,coach factory,coach factory online,coach factory outlet online,coach outlet online, chaussures louboutin, louboutin,louboutin pas cher,christian louboutin,louboutin chaussures,louboutin soldes,chaussure louboutin,chaussures louboutin,chaussure louboutin pas cher,louboutin france, sac michael kors, michael kors,sac michael kors,michael kors sac,michael kors pas cher,sac michael kors pas cher,michael kors france, north face outlet, north face outlet,the north face,north face,the north face outlet,north face jackets,north face jackets clearance,northface, yoga pants, yoga pants,lululemon,lululemon outlet,lululemon athletica,lululemon addict,lulu lemon,lulu.com,lululemon.com, beats by dre

    ReplyDelete
  11. nike shoes, Cheap Jordans,Cheap Jordan Shoes,Cheap Air Max,Cheap Free Run Shoes,nike shoes,nike outlet,nike factory,nike store,nike factory outlet,nike outlet store,cheap nike shoes,nike sneakers, toms outlet, toms outlet,tom shoes,toms shoes outlet,tom shoes,toms wedges,cheap toms,toms.com, air jordan, air jordan,jordan shoes,cheap jordans,air jordans,jordan retro,air jordan shoes,jordans,jordan 11,jordan xx9,jordan 6,new jordans,retro jordans,jordan retro 11,jordan 5,air jordan 11,jordans for sale,jordan 4,jordan 1,jordan future,jordan 3,jordan 12,michael jordan shoes,air jordan retro, cheap jordans, cheap jordans,cheap jordan shoes,cheap jordan,cheap jordans for sale,jordans for cheap,jordan shoes,jordans,air jordan,jordan retro,jordan 11,jordan xx9,jordan 6,new jordans,air jordans,retro jordans,jordan retro 11,jordan 5,air jordan 11,jordans for sale,jordan 4,jordan 1,jordan future,jordan 3,jordan 12,michael jordan shoes,air jordan shoes,air jordan retro, jordan retro, jordan retro,jordan shoes,air jordan,air jordans,retro jordans,air jordan retro,jordans,jordan 11,jordan xx9,jordan 6,new jordans,cheap jordans,jordan retro 11,jordan 5,air jordan 11,jordans for sale,jordan 4,jordan 1,jordan future,jordan 3,jordan 12,michael jordan shoes,air jordan shoes, air max 90, air max 90,nike air max 90,air max 95,air max 2014,air max 2013,air max 1,nike air max,air max,nike air max 2014,airmax,nike air max 2013, air max 95, air max 95,nike air max 95,air max 90,nike air max 90,air max 2013,nike air max,air max,air max 2014,nike air max 2014,airmax,nike air max 2013, nike free 5.0, nike free 5.0, nike free trainer 5.0,nike free run 5.0,free running 2,nike free run,nike free,free running,nike running shoes,nike free trainer,free runs,free run 5.0, omega watches, omega watches,omega watch,replica watches,rolex watches,replica omega watches,rolex,watches for men,watches for women,rolex watches for sale,rolex replica,rolex watch,cartier watches,rolex submariner,fake rolex,rolex replica watches,replica rolex, ralph lauren outlet, ralph lauren outlet,ralph lauren outlet online,polo ralph lauren outlet,polo ralph lauren outlet online,polo ralph lauren,ralph lauren,polo ralph,polo shirts,ralphlauren.com,polo outlet,ralph lauren polo, oakley sunglass, thomas sabo

    ReplyDelete
  12. oakley sunglasses,cheap oakley,cheap oakley sunglasses,oakley sunglasses cheap,oakley outlet,oakley sunglasses outlet,oakley vault,oakleys,oakley.com,sunglasses outlet,cheap sunglasses,oakley prescription glasses,fake oakleys,oakley glasses,oakley store,fake oakley,oakley sale,cheap oakleys,discount oakley sunglasses, ray ban sunglasses, Ray Ban Sunglasses,Ray Ban Outlet,Ray Ban Sale,Cheap Ray Bans,Cheap Ray Ban Sunglasses,ray ban sunglasses outlet,ray ban,rayban,ray bans,ray-ban,raybans,ray ban wayfarer,ray-ban sunglasses,raybans.com,rayban sunglasses,cheap ray ban, burberry, burberry,burberry outlet,burberry outlet online,burberry factory outlet,burberry sale,burberry handbags, chanel bags, chanel bags,chanel handbags,chanel sunglasses,chanel outlet,chanel purses,chanel handbags official site, coach outlet store, coach outlet,coach outlet store,coach outlet store online,coach outlet stores,coach factory outlet,coach factory,coach factory online,coach factory outlet online,coach outlet online, chaussures louboutin, louboutin,louboutin pas cher,christian louboutin,louboutin chaussures,louboutin soldes,chaussure louboutin,chaussures louboutin,chaussure louboutin pas cher,louboutin france, sac michael kors, michael kors,sac michael kors,michael kors sac,michael kors pas cher,sac michael kors pas cher,michael kors france, north face outlet, north face outlet,the north face,north face,the north face outlet,north face jackets,north face jackets clearance,northface, yoga pants, yoga pants,lululemon,lululemon outlet,lululemon athletica,lululemon addict,lulu lemon,lulu.com,lululemon.com, beats by dre, beats by dre,beats headphones,beats audio,beats by dr dre,beats by dre headphones,dr dre,dre beats,beats by dr,dr dre beats,dre headphones,beats by dr. dre,cheap beats, ferragamo, ferragamo,salvatore ferragamo,ferragamo shoes,ferragamo outlet,salvatore ferragamo outlet,ferragamo belts,ferragamo belt,ferragamo outlet, nike blazer, nike blazer,blazer nike,nike blazer pas cher,Chaussures Nike Blazer,Nike Blazer Femme, nike air force, swarovski crystal, swarovski

    ReplyDelete