THE HOUSES OF NANTUCKET COUNTY: The three reversals of Christopher Matthews!

THURSDAY, OCTOBER 2, 2014

Part 5—The greatest flip of all:
MSNBC’s Chris Matthews, the Nantucket burgher, has staged some remarkable flips.

He’s still engaged in his current reversal, the one involving Hillary Clinton. At least through 2008, Matthews was a raging attack dog against the woman he repeatedly derided as “Evita Peron” and “Nurse Ratched”—the woman he found to be “witchy.”

Today, the Nantucket burgher is Hillary Clinton’s most devoted “journalistic” sycophant. His ridiculous fawning has kept him in line with his channel’s new corporate policy.

Such reversals may help a burgher pay his rather steep bills. Matthews summers in a Nantucket home he purchased for $4.35 million back in 2004.

In the spring of 1999, Matthews had engineered a similar mega-flip. All through 1998, right into the start of 1999, he had vouched for the good character of his friend, Al Gore.

Suddenly, he flipped! He spent the next two years savaging Gore in truly remarkable ways. This brought him in line with the political stance of his corporate owner, General Electric’s Jack Welch.

According to press reports, Matthews’ salary went through the roof during this very strange time. By 2004, he was able to buy his way into The Houses of Nantucket County.

Whatever! Today, we’d like to review the cable talker’s greatest flip. It occurred on October 5, 2000 and helped send George Bush to the White House.

No doubt, this reversal pleased Boss Welch. Here’s a quick bit of background:

On Tuesday, October 3, 2000, Candidate Bush and Candidate Gore staged their first debate.

The mainstream press had spent several weeks “lowering expectations” for Bush. On NBC’s cable arm, a somewhat peculiar pundit panel had been assembled to offer its views about the upcoming debates:
Moderator: Brian Williams
Chris Matthews
Peggy Noonan
Mike Barnicle
Doris Kearns Goodwin
By happenstance or by design, the all-East Coast Irish Catholic panel was made in Boss Welch’s image. The panel certainly hadn’t been picked to favor Candidate Gore.

Matthews had savaged Gore for two years. On his own cable program, Williams had been less insane, but his tilt had run the same way.

Noonan was a standard conservative voice, and a bit crazy to boot. Barnicle was a long-time Clinton-hater.

Goodwin was best known for a lazy instinct to agree with everyone else.

That said, a very strange thing occurred this night. After Bush and Gore debated, the panelists all agreed: Gore had cleaned Bush’s clock. The main debate among the panel involved a search for the reason why Candidate Bush did so poorly.

The pundits were badly off-message. Two nights later, this would produce a truly remarkable flip.

Back to October 3. After the debate concluded, Williams suggested an instant framework. After that, he threw to Matthews.

Here’s what Matthews said:
WILLIAMS (10/3/00): Good evening. There was a collision this evening in Boston, Massachusetts, between two formidable men and two competing ideologies. We should probably stress at the outset there were no major injuries. Both men walked away from it.

Chris Matthews, the host of Hardball, is with me here tonight. Chris, your assessment of what went on tonight.

MATTHEWS: Not long ago I saw Al Gore in a marathon—a 26-miler.

Tonight was a marathon event. He was in training for tonight, he was overpowering, he had the stamina, he had an encyclopedic ability to talk about an issue for almost hours at a time. George W. Bush came into a format that he tried to avoid, for weeks he tried to avoid this kind of format because it’s not his format. He’s not able to sustain an argument over a long period of time. He can make a quick statement—he’s a sprinter. He can make a statement quickly and concisely. Unfortunately, he cannot dominate the time in the way Al Gore could tonight.

Al Gore didn’t sweat, as I thought he might. Al Gore was effective in dominating the format, he dominated the time, and I have to say he dominated the debate.
Say what? For whatever reason, Matthews had abandoned a preference he had pimped for two years.

Instantly, Williams tried to impose the idea that Bush had “held his own.” In response, Matthews offered a wildly inaccurate assessment—an assessment which showed had thoroughly he thought Gore had dominated the proceedings:
WILLIAMS (continuing directly): If you're going to give the victory to Gore, what can be said here about George W. Bush, that he held his own?

MATTHEWS: That he'll do better next week in a format which is sitting around a table like this where, if you don't talk too much, you're considered a gentleman.

The format tonight rewarded the most loquacious person at the table. Al Gore—he didn't even wait for Jim Lehrer to give him time. He just took it.

On occasion, he'd say, "Jim, I need more time," and just took it then. He— I would like to see the, the word count tonight. I'd say it's about at least 3 to 2, maybe 2 to 1 Gore, and that's only going to work in a format where it's like a college classroom situation where the kid who stands up and has all the answers it the winner.

In a sit-around-the-table or sitting-along-a-bar kind of conversation and, certainly, an after-dinner conversation in most American homes, the person who is cogent and short and responsible to use their time with limited amounts of time looks like the winner.

I think tonight gave the benefit to the guy who talked the most. I think next week will give the benefit of the doubt to the guy who talks the least.

WILLIAMS: That certainly gives the edge to Gore in the science of debate, of the debate. Whether or not that was the lump assessment by the American people, especially the undecideds watching around the country, will wait to be seen.
Just for the record, what was “the lump assessment by the American people?” On all five overnight polls, voters judged Gore to be the winner of the debate, by an average margin of ten points.

Meanwhile, Matthews had completely misjudged the word count. In fact, Gore spoke fewer words than Bush at this first debate. Matthews thought Gore had spoken possibly twice as many, so thoroughly did he think that Gore had dominated the session.

Matthews was way off message. Relentlessly, he had been trashing Candidate Gore for the previous nineteen months. But as he answered Williams’ next question, he searched for reasons why Candidate Bush had done so poorly this night.

Williams played tape of one exchange, then offered another debunking framework. Matthews kept refusing to run with the proffered scripts:
WILLIAMS: That was pretty much the way that topic went, back and forth. More, more heat than light, do you think?

MATTHEWS: I thought that a couple of times— In fact, three times tonight, there were unanswered charges by...Gore towards Bush.

[...]

I don't know whether he's tired tonight. People say he had a cold. People say he goes to bed normally before this time of night at 9:30. Whatever it was, he wasn't quick and acute enough to respond to these charges.

There's a little bit of Michael Dukakis out there tonight, and that's very dangerous in politics. Let no unfair shot go unanswered. He let three shots that I know go unanswered tonight.
Matthews inserted the unsupported claim that Gore’s charges had been “unfair.” But by now, he was looking for the reasons why Candidate Bush had performed so poorly. He even dropped the ultimate bomb: Bush had resembled Dukakis!

For what it’s worth, the other panelists agreed with Matthews. In her first statement, the conservative Noonan said this:

“Well, Brian, I think Gore dominated from the get-go, to tell you the truth. As he stood and gave his statements, I think he seemed to be a person of greater sophistication, greater stature, greater subtlety. He was in his zone. Bush seemed to me, I must tell you, unfocused, a little bit tired in time, a gentleman who forgets the predicate of the statement. He gives you little bursts of sound as opposed to a seriously, thought-out few sentences that make very clear his point of view…”

Barnicle meandered thusly:

“One of the marvelous things about this country, Brian, in terms of its election, the way we elect a president, it's the one thing that we all do together, perhaps the last thing we all do together. And if tonight was a job interview…and I think that perhaps many of [the voters] were looking at this program tonight as it was—if it was a job interview, and they are going to, they're going to hire the person that they saw tonight, one of them was much more dominant than the other: the vice president of the United States.”

Despite Williams’ valiant attempts to give each candidate a trophy, no one thought Candidate Bush had held his own this night. That said, we’ll focus on Matthews’ statements.

Those statements would lead him, two nights later, to the greatest flip of all. The rest of the panel would join him.

On Tuesday, October 3, Matthews gave his instant assessment: Gore “dominated the debate.” Bush looked like he had a cold. Perhaps he’d been up past his bedtime.

By the following night, October 4, waves of pundits were declaring that the debate had been a draw. In response to this group assessment, Matthews broke every rule in the pundit rule book.

On the October 4 Hardball, Matthews spoke with the late Christopher Hitchens, another inveterate Clinton/Gore-hater. As they discussed the debate, Matthews and Hitchens accused their fellow pundits of refusing to tell the truth about Gore’s obvious dominance.

“I can't believe what I'm reading this morning,” Hitchens said. “...I mean, there was no real contest. The vice president did everything but kiss Governor Bush's wife for him, it seemed to me. It was—he didn't just eat his lunch, he regurgitated his lunch...But there was absolutely no contest.”

Hitchens said he was “puzzling over the stupidity, which I think is willful, of the pundits this morning.” He speculated that pundits weren’t being honest about the debate because they didn’t want to be accused of liberal bias.

Matthews then gave his own assessment. He said Gore “cleaned his clock:”
MATTHEWS (10/4/00): Could it be that the punditry class is the only profession in which you're allowed to simply take a pass and say, “I'm not going to be a pundit tonight?”

I couldn’t believe the number of people who chickened out last night. It was clear to me—and I’m no fan of either of these guys entirely, and I can certainly say that about the one who I thought won last night, that’s Al Gore—I thought he cleaned the other guy’s clock, and I said so last night. All four national polls agreed with that. In fact, the ones with the—the one with the largest sample, which was CBS, found a 14-point spread of those who thought that the vice president really leveled the other guy.

I don’t understand why people are afraid to say so, because it's simply a judgment as to performance, not as to values and principles.
Matthews acknowledged the distaste for Gore which he’d spent two years affecting. (Hitchens had already said that he was “no fan” of Gore.)

But now, Matthews not only said that Gore “cleaned Bush’s clock” in that first debate. Like Hitchens, he directly accused his fellow pundits of refusing to tell the truth about that obvious fact.

Matthews’ assessment could hardly have been any clearer. In real time, on October 3, he said Gore “dominated the debate.” On October 4, he said that Gore had “cleaned his clock” and that pundit were lying about it.

Then came the greatest flip of all!

It started on the Hardball program of Thursday, October 5. In am extremely unusual booking, Matthews spent the whole first half of his show speaking with Rush Limbaugh, who lectured Matthews about how well Bush had done.

For the record, Matthews didn’t have his arms pulled back like a Chinese convict, at least not while on the air. Weirdly, though, he actually seemed to be agreeing with Limbaugh’s assessment of the debate!

And sure enough! That evening, Brian Williams assembled his pundit panel to discuss the Cheney-Lieberman debate, which was occurring that night.

In the hour before the debate began, Williams did something extremely peculiar. Rather than discuss the upcoming debate, he played a lengthy excerpt of Matthews’s session with Limbaugh.

As part of the lengthy excerpt, viewers saw Matthews play a brief clip from the October 3 debate. They then saw Matthews start to engineer the greatest flip.

The transcript shown below is from the October 5 Hardball. That evening, this clip was replayed for Williams’ viewers, who were in the process of being propagandized.

Matthews trashes Gore in this clip. This represents the start of an astounding flip:
MATTHEWS (10/5/00): Let's take a look. Here's Bush going at Gore on that very issue of character.

(BEGIN VIDEO CLIP, 10/3 DEBATE)
BUSH: I think the thing that discouraged me about the vice president was uttering those famous words "no controlling legal authority." I felt like that there needed to be a better sense of responsibility of what was going on in the White House.

GORE: You have attacked my character and credibility and I am not going to respond in kind. I think we ought to focus on the problems and not attack each other.
[END VIDEO CLIP]

LIMBAUGH: Who does he remind you of? He's trying to look like Reagan. Now, all you Gore supporters out there, you've been told for 20 years what a low-down, dirty rotten skunk Ronald Reagan was. Here is your nominee doing his best to make you think that's who he is.

MATTHEWS: I'll tell you one thing—

LIMBAUGH: I would be offended if I were you.

MATTHEWS: He couldn't get through the schools I went to with that kind of face. He would have been punched out so early in life.

LIMBAUGH: Absolutely not, condescending and all that head bobbing and doing all this talking down to people. But Bush didn't attack. He answered a question from Jim Lehrer.

MATTHEWS: I know.
All of a sudden, Matthews had a new attitude. Returning to his rancid behavior of the previous years, he pictured Gore getting punched out in school, so offensive had he been at Tuesday night’s debate.

Waiting for that evening’s vice presidential debate, Williams played that clip for his viewers. Soon afterward, he helped his panel rethink the terrible things they had said only two nights before.

Back on October 3, they all agreed that Gore had dominated the debate. They’d searched for reasons to explain why Bush had been so awful.

The pundits could all see clearly now! Suddenly, that October 3 debate was looking quite different.

It was a remarkable flip. Barnicle introduced it:
BARNICLE (10/5/00): One of the most fascinating things that has been said here this evening was actually said by Rush Limbaugh when he noted, accurately, that, you know, all of this offense that everyone takes that—supposedly, you know, attacks on people's character—I mean, Al Gore, the other evening when he said that— I mean, my God, it was so lame! And in retrospect, when you look at the TV clips that are shown in our technology today, when you see Bush and Gore matched up in the TV clips, Bush actually comes off better, I think, than Gore does when matched up in TV clips.
How weird! Two nights before, this horrible person had agreed with everyone else. (“If it was a job interview,” voters were going to hire Gore, who had been “much more dominant.”)

Now, a new story had surfaced. Barnicle was saying that Bush actually came off better than Gore, if you stuck to the little short TV clips! And in one of the worst group flips of all time, all the other pundits signed on, even including Matthews.

The exchange started with Brian embarrassing himself:
WILLIAMS (continuing directly): It's a television age. You know? And that's a perfect point, really, in this TV age.

NOONAN: Yes, it is. Things get cut down to 12 seconds. And in fairness, people who are producers, who cut these things, they try to get the moment where a guy became vivid and said something. In Bush's case, when you cut his sometimes ragged thoughts into six seconds, you are getting the best of him, and he really goes forward in those cuts, whereas Mr. Gore is a somewhat slower, perhaps in a way more—

MATTHEWS: Maybe the governor of Texas didn't know it was a live broadcast the other night. He was just putting together snippets for use later. I mean, I think you're so brilliant on that, Mike, because the fact is that we have seen a better-looking Bush since the debate than we saw in that the 90 minutes on air.

BARNICLE: Yes. Well, you know, when we just saw that clip just a few short minutes ago about Gore posing this famed offense that he took, it was a pose. It was clearly a set piece and he was going to say it. If George W. Bush had said to Al Gore at that moment, “I've always admired the way you and your wife have had this wonderful relationship,” Al Gore would then have gone into, “You've attacked my character.” It's an act! It's a pose!

MATTHEWS: You know what's interesting? Coming up next, looking ahead just a bit to the next battle, the two people we're talking about, is—Doris Kearns knows this, and anyone else who's watched, that there are a number of Al Gores. There is the Al Gore you meet and talk history with, the one you talk about your kids with, there is the stiff you meet, the cigar-store Indian who's occasionally available to you. You know, I bet he presents a new Al Gore next week: unlike the lecturing man at the podium, he'll come in as the friendly guy at the table. Don't you expect that?

GOODWIN: Well, I think he's certainly going to try to. He's already signaled that he's going to do that. But I don't know whether or not he's in control of those sighs and shrugs that seem to come up from inside. I mean, I don't think he meant to be that obnoxious the other night. He claimed that he didn't know that he was being seen on the screen. But that was welling up from inside...

MATTHEWS: He reminded me of a professional bowler who just got a 10-strike and the other guy had hit a gutter ball and he was laughing at the guy. Every time Bush made a slight little mistake or hesitation, he laughed at him.

NOONAN: It wasn't classy. It was poor sportsmanship.
Just like that, all the standard Gore-trashing was back! Voters were handed the standard old insults about the stiff, fake and phony, two-faced demon, Al Gore.

Matthews had been spewing these insults since March 1999, when he produced his previous flip. Suddenly now, he was back on-message, after two days of telling the world what he actually thought.

As it turned out, Gore had been “lecturing” Tuesday night when he had seemed to “clean Bush’s clock.” All the pundits could see it now! Before this, they had been wrong!

From that moment forward at NBC News, Candidate Gore had lost that first debate. The ardent Matthews turned on a dime. We’d call it his greatest flip.

Let’s review the re-engineering of this horrendous person:

On Tuesday night, October 3, he said Gore “dominated the debate.” He searched for reasons which might explain why Bush had done so poorly.

On Wednesday night, October 4, he said that Gore had “cleaned Bush’s clock.” He said he couldn’t imagine why other pundits were refusing to say so.

On Thursday night, October 5, he renounced his heresy. First, someone sent Rush Limbaugh in to lecture him for half an hour. By that evening, he could see that he had been wrong, oh so wrong!

When we first recorded this remarkable business, we asked a fairly obvious question:

Inside the bowels of NBC News, what produced this remarkable change? Is it possible that a phone call came from The Houses of Nantucket County?

Tomorrow: The sounds of silence

19 comments:

  1. OMB (Summer Reruns with the OTB)

    Somebody beep us when we get to the part where Matthews buys the house in Nantucket.

    We've heard all the other parts many times before and frankly, after the six pack of stories about Chris the Almost-Killer, the kooky Katholic Kids Post Debate Dance story isn't just dull in the fifth of sixth retelling. It's deadly dull.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Why, oh why, do keep reading, day after day after day, stuff you find so dull? How weird is that?

      This particular story I had never seen before.

      Delete
    2. ZKoD, I am so tired of hearing your relentless complaints about Somerby. Please go live your life somewhere else.

      Delete
    3. Don't pay attention to them ZK. I like your contributions, especially the ones about casting spells. Don't let the haters get you down. You know what they say: haters got a point. Or something.

      Delete

    4. I am posting on this site on how a great Dr Brave help me bring back my wife ??

      Hello to every one out here, am here to share the unexpected miracle that happened to me three days ago, My name is Jeffrey Dowling,i live in Texas,USA.and I`m happily married to a lovely and caring wife,with two kids A very big problem occurred in my family seven months ago,between me and my wife so terrible that she took the case to court for a divorce she said that she never wanted to stay with me again,and that she did not love me anymore So she packed out of my house and made me and my children passed through severe pain. I tried all my possible means to get her back,after much begging,but all to no avail and she confirmed it that she has made her decision,and she never wanted to see me again. So on one evening,as i was coming back from work,i met an old friend of mine who asked of my wife So i explained every thing to her,so she told me that the only way i can get my wife back,is to visit a spell caster,because it has really worked for her too So i never believed in spell,but i had no other choice,than to follow her advice. Then she gave me the email address of the spell caster whom she visited.(bravespellcaster@gmail.com}, So the next morning,i sent a mail to the address she gave to me,and the spell caster assured me that i will get my wife back the next day what an amazing statement!! I never believed,so he spoke with me,and told me everything that i need to do. Then the next morning, So surprisingly, my wife who did not call me for the past seven {7}months,gave me a call to inform me that she was coming back So Amazing!! So that was how she came back that same day,with lots of love and joy,and she apologized for her mistake,and for the pain she caused me and my children. Then from that day,our relationship was now stronger than how it were before,by the help of a spell caster . So, was now stronger than how it were before,by the help of a spell caster . So, i will advice you out there to kindly visit the same website http://bravespellcaster.yolasite.com,if you are in any condition like this,or you have any problem related to “bringing your ex back. So thanks to Dr Brave for bringing back my wife,and brought great joy to my family once again.{bravespellcaster@gmail.com} , Thanks.

      Delete
    5. urban legend, you obviously missed the first almost word for word rendition of this story. Bob told it in April, 2007 and links to it in this post. Of course then it was a mere post which had aged only seven years. Not nearly as potent as the stuff in the cask for fourteen.

      Delete
    6. My name is ADMAS ELLIA and i want to testify of the good work done by a faithful man DR OFURE a spell caster in my life i never thought there is such thing as spiritual intercession. my problem started 5 months back when the father of my kids started putting up some strange behaviour, i never knew he was having an affair outside our matrimonial home. it dawn on me on that faithful day 4th of April 20st 2:23pm when he came to the house to pick his things, that was when i knew that situation has gotten out of hand and he then told me he want to quit the marriage which i have built for over 6 years, i was confused and dumbfounded i called on family's and friends but to no avail. two months after i started having problem with my kids welfare, rent-age and all of it, i really went through hair. until a day i was browsing on the internet and i happen to meet DR OFRUE, i never believed on this but i needed my man back so i gave the spell caster my problem at first i never trusted him so i was just doing it but you know a problem shared is half solved after 2das my husband called me Telling me that he his coming back home and that was all. now we are living happily as husband and wife, i still can believe it just too real to be real it highly unbelievable on this great joy for those of you that are going through heart broke or any kind of problem i must tell you this great man has the power to solve any problem hear is the great man email:OFURELOVESPELL@GMAIL.COM or you call +2348149158514

      Delete
  2. FWIW I recall that debate. I thought Gore wasn't impressive, but Bush was just awful. His comments were almost devoid of content.

    In their 1 debate, Cheney and Lieberman both out-debated Gore and Bush IMHO.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Speaking of hobby horses, MSNBC has been riding a few of their own this week while giving us nothing but dead silence about the beheading of a plain, middle-aged white woman in Oklahoma by some guy who was at least copycating ISIL/ISIS.

    I don't think the Fox News approach, screaming for lynch parties for Moslems (as well as Ferguson protesters), is quite called for at this point. But silence? Don't tell the peasants; you'll only encourage the poor ignorant dears' Islamophobia. By this logic, we shouldn't have been told about Ebola in Dallas. Or tiny earthquakes in Oklahoma oilfields. If you don't want to spook the herd, don't spook the herd.

    Since when is a beheading in American not news in America? Especially when we're going to war over similar beheadings in the Middle East? A local story? A workplace dispute? Oh, Fox just wants you to forget all the anti-government nuts who do bad things all the time, cries Salon.

    This is a crystalizing example of the stark contrast between the two worldviews these horrible outlets are serving up for us. Sure wish we had some wise person to expound sagely upon this death of objective journalism and critical thinking for us.

    And what about the 2000 election? When is somebody going to bring that up?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. From the NY Times:

      "An Oklahoma man was charged Tuesday with first-degree murder in the beheading of a co-worker, but federal officials said they had found no links between him and Islamic extremist groups that have beheaded several Western hostages in the Middle East and North Africa in recent weeks."

      This isn't news because it is apparently a deranged and/or disgruntled worker attacking a coworker. The manner of the attack may be borrowed from the headlines but it isn't the same kind of event at its heart. It is sad, but not really news.

      Delete

  4. I am posting on this site on how a great Dr Brave help me bring back my wife ??

    Hello to every one out here, am here to share the unexpected miracle that happened to me three days ago, My name is Jeffrey Dowling,i live in Texas,USA.and I`m happily married to a lovely and caring wife,with two kids A very big problem occurred in my family seven months ago,between me and my wife so terrible that she took the case to court for a divorce she said that she never wanted to stay with me again,and that she did not love me anymore So she packed out of my house and made me and my children passed through severe pain. I tried all my possible means to get her back,after much begging,but all to no avail and she confirmed it that she has made her decision,and she never wanted to see me again. So on one evening,as i was coming back from work,i met an old friend of mine who asked of my wife So i explained every thing to her,so she told me that the only way i can get my wife back,is to visit a spell caster,because it has really worked for her too So i never believed in spell,but i had no other choice,than to follow her advice. Then she gave me the email address of the spell caster whom she visited.(bravespellcaster@gmail.com}, So the next morning,i sent a mail to the address she gave to me,and the spell caster assured me that i will get my wife back the next day what an amazing statement!! I never believed,so he spoke with me,and told me everything that i need to do. Then the next morning, So surprisingly, my wife who did not call me for the past seven {7}months,gave me a call to inform me that she was coming back So Amazing!! So that was how she came back that same day,with lots of love and joy,and she apologized for her mistake,and for the pain she caused me and my children. Then from that day,our relationship was now stronger than how it were before,by the help of a spell caster . So, was now stronger than how it were before,by the help of a spell caster . So, i will advice you out there to kindly visit the same website http://bravespellcaster.yolasite.com,if you are in any condition like this,or you have any problem related to “bringing your ex back. So thanks to Dr Brave for bringing back my wife,and brought great joy to my family once again.{bravespellcaster@gmail.com} , Thanks.

    ReplyDelete


  5. My name is Cynthia Bullock, am from maimi usa. i want to use this opportunity to thank my great doctor who really made my life a pleasurable one today. This great man omamen brought my husband back to me, i had 2 lovely kids for my husband, about 3 years ago i and my husband has been into one qaurrel or the other until he finally left me for one lady. i felt my life was over and my kids thought they would never see their father again. i tried to be stronge just for the kids but i could not control the pains that torments my heart, my heart was filled with sorrows and pains because i was really in love with my husband. Every day and night i think of him and always wish he would come back to me, until one day i met a good friend of mine that was also in a situation like me but her problem was her ex-boyfriend who she had an unwanted pregnancy for and he refused to take responsibility and dumped her. she told me that mINE was a small case and that i shouldnt worry about it at all so i asked her what was the solution to my problems and she gave me this great man phone number and his email address. i was doubting if this man was the solution, so contacted this great man and he told me what to do and i deed them all, he told me to wait for just two day and that my husband will come crawlling on his kneels just for forgiveness so i faithfully deed what this great man asked me to do and for sure after two days i heard a knock on the door, in a great suprise i saw him on his kneels and i was speechless, when he saw me, all he did was crying and asking me for forgiveness, from that day, all the pains and sorrows in my heart flew away,since then i and my husband and our lovely kids are happy.thats why i want to say a big thank you to omamen. This great man made me to understand that theres no problem on earth that has no solution so please if you know that you have this same problem or any problem that is similar, i will advise you to come straight to this great man. you can email him at:omamenspiritultemple@gmail.com.

    ReplyDelete

  6. I am Miss speck from USA, I promise to share this testimony all over the world once my boyfriend return back to me, and today with all due respect i want to thank DR ozala for bringing joy and happiness to my relationship and my family. I want to inform you all that there is a spell caster that is real and genuine. I never believed in any of these things until i loosed my boyfriend, I required help until i found drozalaspelltemple@gmail.com a grate spell caster, And he cast a love spell for me, and he assured me that I will get my boyfriend back in two days after the spell has been cast. two days later, my phone rang, and so shockingly, it was my boyfriend who has not called me for past 3 years now, and made an apology for the heart break, and told me that he is ready to be my back bone till the rest of his life with me. DR ozala released him up to know how much i loved and wanted him. And opened his eyes to picture how much we have share together. As I’m writing this testimony right now I’m the most happiest girl on earth and me and my fiance is living a happy life and our love is now stronger than how it were even before our break up. So that’s why I promised to share my testimony all over the universe.All thanks goes to DR ozala for the excessive work that he has done for me. Below is the email address in situation you are undergoing a heart break, and I assure you that as he has done mine for me, he will definitely help you too. drozalaspelltemple@gmail.com

    ReplyDelete

  7. I am Miss speck from USA, I promise to share this testimony all over the world once my boyfriend return back to me, and today with all due respect i want to thank DR ozala for bringing joy and happiness to my relationship and my family. I want to inform you all that there is a spell caster that is real and genuine. I never believed in any of these things until i loosed my boyfriend, I required help until i found drozalaspelltemple@gmail.com a grate spell caster, And he cast a love spell for me, and he assured me that I will get my boyfriend back in two days after the spell has been cast. two days later, my phone rang, and so shockingly, it was my boyfriend who has not called me for past 3 years now, and made an apology for the heart break, and told me that he is ready to be my back bone till the rest of his life with me. DR ozala released him up to know how much i loved and wanted him. And opened his eyes to picture how much we have share together. As I’m writing this testimony right now I’m the most happiest girl on earth and me and my fiance is living a happy life and our love is now stronger than how it were even before our break up. So that’s why I promised to share my testimony all over the universe.All thanks goes to DR ozala for the excessive work that he has done for me. Below is the email address in situation you are undergoing a heart break, and I assure you that as he has done mine for me, he will definitely help you too. drozalaspelltemple@gmail.com

    ReplyDelete
  8. Seriously i was flattened when my Husband of 8 years left to be with another woman in Texas. I cried and sobbed every day, until it got so bad that I couldn't bear it anymore. and i reached out to the Internet for help, until i hit on the real thing, and that is you Lord Lugard. I almost gave up trying to get my Ex Husband back and having a contented family again.. I had tried the whole lot I knew, and with your spells, blessings and extraordinary magical powers, you did all the work, and immediately after 24 hours, my Ex Husband came back to me and he was penitent for everything that he has done. And now my life is balanced and i am happy again. Lord Lugard you do a great service to people, and I don't think many people had known about you. You are the diamond in the rough. Thank you Lord Lugard You are talented and you give off yourself so freely like you did to me. Thank you for weaving your magical love spells for me and Sergio. He is back to me just the way it was when we first met.. from the depths of my soul! I am immensely happy now. Thank you and God bless you so much sir. now my man is back to me just in 24 hours, as you have said it..wow.. i am fully rewarded. Thank you so much sir, Lots of appreciations.. Here is Lord Lugard's Website: website: http://miracletemplespells.webs.com and his Email: miracletemple@live.com. Carolyn Martin frm New York..

    ReplyDelete