Campaign watch: Brother Hayes seems to take it back!

TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 16, 2016

And then, he changes his stance:
Midway through last evening's show, Chris Hayes seemed to take it back.

He seemed to acknowledge that he had erred at the start of Friday night's program. For our report on Friday's groaner, you can just click here. For TPM's report on his semi-retraction, you can just click this.

(Warning! TPM didn't bother producing an accurate transcript of the remarks in question, the remarks Bill Clinton made in Memphis last Thursday night.)

We say Hayes made a semi-retraction for the following reason. First, he acknowledged that he'd made an error. (Everyone does.) But then he took it back!

This is the start of his presentation. He seems to acknowledge his error:
HAYES (2/15/16): On Friday night, we reported on comments [Bill Clinton] made during a stop in Memphis, Tennessee and we cited him as saying about Hillary Clinton and President Obama, quote,

"She's always making something good happen. She's the best change maker I've ever known. A lot of people say, 'Oh well, you don't understand. It's different now. It's rigged.' Yeah, it's rigged because you don't have a president who is a change maker."

Now, a number of people pointed out—quite a few actually, and rightly—that Clinton's full remarks changed the context of that point and that he actually went on to defend President Obama against his critics. So here it is in full.
At this point, Hayes played the full tape of what Bill Clinton had actually said. Hayes had already seemed to say that people who criticized his previous report had actually done so "rightly."

Hayes played the full tape of what Bill Clinton said. But then, after playing the tape, he had to go and say this:
HAYES: Now, we did not characterize Clinton as trashing the president or slamming him as some others did. We said he went off message, which is arguably true. But here's the important thing. In cutting off that clip in the editing, we didn't allow you the chance to make that judgment for yourselves in the full light of context. We shouldn't have done that.
Hayes may not have been wrong after all! "Arguably," his claim had actually been right!

We're sorry Hayes made that remark, which was total BS. In fact, Bill Clinton did not go off-message in Memphis that night. In fact, he was directly on message. He was suggesting that Candidate Sanders, or some of his supporters, have been saying bad things about Barack Obama.

Bill Clinton said nice thing about Obama that night. His insinuations were pretty clear about those who have criticized Obama.

Personally, we'd be happier if Bill Clinton didn't do that. We also would have been happier if Hayes had simply acknowledged his howling error and had said nothing more after that!

16 comments:

  1. The product of the soviet hive mind.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The mendacity of a Menshevik.

      Delete
  2. The Usual Troll ContingentFebruary 16, 2016 at 5:28 PM

    Somerby used the word "seems."

    'nuff said.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. An excellent suggestion on your part UTC. Many may have surpressed mordant chuckles. Or so I insinuated.

      Delete
  3. HRC suggests it would be whimsical for canines to bark when politicians are caught lying.

    http://insider.foxnews.com/2016/02/16/greg-gutfeld-reacts-hillary-clinton-barking-dog-calling-republicans-liars

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The broken-record troll is back, rolling over for pennies.

      Delete
    2. HRC's retort to you is "Wuff --- Wuff!"

      Delete
    3. I thought her's was more of a "Yap---Yap,"
      or do I have it confused with you?

      Delete
    4. You are seriously fighting about what kind of dogs you are?

      Delete
    5. It is, after all, a post about The Puppy.

      Delete
  4. The Puppy was too proud to just admit his dishonesty without adding a weaselly distraction.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yes, unlike Bob who never adds a weasly distraction because he never admits he is wrong. After all, Gov. Ultrasound never really did anything THAT bad.

      Delete
  5. Jesse Juan S.C. JacksonFebruary 17, 2016 at 10:19 AM

    "Bill Clinton said nice thing about Obama that night. His insinuations were pretty clear about those who have criticized Obama.

    Personally, we'd be happier if Bill Clinton didn't do that."

    So what is Bob saying would have made him happier?

    That Clinton said nothing nice about Obama?

    That Clinton insinuated nothing about Obama critics?

    Or both?

    Because if Clinton did both, arguably he would have been a bit off message from his wife's campaign, which is rhetorically hugging the President pretty tightly.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Somerby is a Sanders supporter. He doesn't like it when Clinton attacks Sanders. Those Obama critics are in the Sanders camp because yes, HRC is hugging the President tightly, as well she should. You guys wanted Obama, you got him, you should stand by him. But loyalty isn't a Sanders virtue, especially since he doesn't much believe in political parties.

      Delete
    2. You didn't want Obama?

      Delete
  6. Is my gratitude and honor to say a big thanks to a man with truth and do as he promise plz every one on this site should join me and thank Dr happy for the glory and happiness he gave to me i break up with my husband 2 week back and i was down and do not know what to do until i saw a post about this spell caster Dr happy who i explain my situation to, and them he said to me cry not my daughter for what you seek for is right here in my temple he gave me hope when i have no hope to to my greatest notice, he did the spell for me and my husband was back 3 days after the spell plz if you need any help my advise is for you all go to Dr happy coz he is the best of all contact him via happylovespell2@gmail.com

    ReplyDelete