Hillary Clinton's interviews start!


Will a famous newspaper get mentioned:
Last Friday morning, the New York Times reported on its first look at Hillary Clinton's new book.

Mark Landler got the assignment. At one point, he offered this:
LANDLER (9/8/17): The news media, and The New York Times in particular, come in for scathing criticism by Mrs. Clinton for covering the email saga obsessively, while playing down evidence of links between Mr. Trump and Russia. The Times, she said, perpetuated the narrative that the Clintons had a penchant for secrecy, adding, ''I've always found that charge odd.''

Mrs. Clinton characterized The Times's coverage of her as schizophrenic, with reliable endorsements of her campaigns on the editorial page offset by persistently negative news coverage. ''I suppose this mini-rant guarantees that my book will receive a rip-her-to-shreds review in The Times,'' she wrote, ''but history will agree that this coverage affected the outcome of the election. Besides, I had to get this off my chest!''

With other targets, Mrs. Clinton was more judicious, if still stinging...
According to Landler, Clinton's comments about the Times fell well short of "judicious!"

We haven't read Clinton's book. We don't know how much attention she devotes to the New York Times.

That said, this topic extends back twenty-five years. It goes all the way back to the front-page reports in the New York Times which invented the "Whitewater" pseudo-scandal, the thrashed nothingburger which gave its name to an era of pseudo-scandal.

The whole Whitewater pseudo-scandal was hatched by the New York Times. In 1996, Gene Lyons wrote the book on this topic, based upon a lengthy essay he'd written in Harper's. His book's title went like this:

Fools for Scandal: How the Media Invented Whitewater

By "the media," Lyons mainly meant the New York Times and the Washington Post. The remarks to which Landler refers track all the way back to there.

Here's our question: Will Anderson Cooper and Rachel Maddow ask Clinton about the Times?

Ever since the beginning, careerist liberals have understood that they simply mustn't go there. Despite its provenance at Harper's, Lyons' book was widely disappeared, along with his second book, written with Joe Conason, The Hunting of the President.

The code of silence extended well beyond that. When the Times and the Post launched their disordered twenty-month War Against Gore, career liberals all knew they must keep their traps shut about that jihad as well.

On TV, Chris Matthews was the leading attack dog in this disordered campaign against Gore. Beyond that, he directed misogynist insults at Hillary Clinton for many years.

But so what? thanks to the code of silence, you've never seen another journalist write about Matthews' disordered behavior toward Gore. Aside from public editor Clark Hoyt, you've never seen a journalist discuss the ludicrous work of the disordered Maureen Dowd.

People like Maddow know these rules well. Make no mistake—Maddow's a talented "con man."

For whatever reasons, the wars against both Clintons, then Gore, came from within the mainstream press, especially the Post and the Times (and NBC News, and its cable arms). Now that she's no longer running for office, it seems that Clinton has decided to say the name of the Times.

That said, Maddow's still running for wealth and for fame. To what extent will she, and Cooper, ask Clinton about the Times?

As you know, it isn't done! Will Maddow and Cooper do it?

There she goes again: We feel obliged to challenged this statement by Clinton:

"History will agree that this coverage [by the New York Times] affected the outcome of the election."

If history still exists, will it say such things about the Times? All the evidence says it will not. The code of silence is very strong, and carries over among the professors.

Dearest darlings, use your heads! Such things simply aren't done!


  1. Somerby has to disagree with Clinton even when he agrees with her. History will vindicate her because the sources exist to do so. History isn't written by journalists. It is written by history professors who present and debate evidence. That's why Clinton will come out fine.

  2. "We haven't read Clinton's book."

    Maybe he should do that before discussing it.

    1. This wasn't a discussion of the book.
      Cleared that up for you.

    2. Heaven forbid he should discuss what she says.

  3. Some of the crap conservatives read on the internet comes from Russia.


  4. The Times and the Post, stunned by the election results, said they would engage in serious journalism from then on. That lasted about two days.

  5. All the faithful here - buy The Book! Now!

    Remember: every sale makes the Dark Lord Putin and Satan Trump shriek in pain!

    1. Witness Mao shrieking in pain too!

    2. Dark Lord Putin and Satan Trump protect Mao. He's not shrieking in pain -- he's grimacing on arena.

  6. Good day everybody,
    I'm from United Kingdom (GB). This is my testimony on how I won 53,193,914 million pounds on Mega millions lottery. I want to use this opportunity to thank Dr IyaryI, for casting winning spell for me to win the lottery of 53,193,194 million pounds,lottery ticket. I have been playing lotteries for the past 5 years now and i have never won any. Ever since then i have not been able to win any lotto and i was so upset and i needed help to win this mega million lottery. so i decided to go online and search for help, there i saw so many good testimony about this man called Dr Iyaryi,of how he has cast lucky spell lotto for people to win the lottery. I contacted him also and tell him i want to win the Mega millions lottery, he cast a spell for me which i use to play and won 53.193,914 million pounds in mega millions lottery. I am so grateful to this man, just in-case you also need him to help you win, you can contact him through his Email: driayaryi2012@hotmail.com, and he will surely help you just the way he has helped me. i will forever be grateful to him and always testify the good work of him to the hole world. contact him via Email: driayaryi2012@hotmail.com, or you can also contact him through his email and he will surely help you to win any kind of lottery And also Reach him on WhatsApp Number: +2349057915709 Thanks Dr. Iyaryi

  7. Real Spell Casters Reviews,Dr.Unity can help get ex back fast,restore broken relationships and stop a divorce!.My name is Wendy Hill from UK.
    My husband divorce me with no reason 4 months ago, and i tried all i could to have him back cos i really love him so much but all my effort did not work out.. we met at our early ageat the college and we both have feelings for each other and we got married happily for 8 years with two kid and he woke up one morning and he told me he’s going on a divorce..i thought it was a joke and when he came back from work he tender to me a divorce letter and he packed all his belongings from the house..i ran mad and i tried all i could to have him back but all did not work out..i was lonely for almost 4 months ..I became very worried and needed help. so i searched for help online and I came across a website that suggested Dr.Unity can help get ex back fast, restore broken relationships and stop a divorce. So, I felt I should give him a try. I contacted him and told him my problems and he told me what to do and i did it and he did a love spell for me. 28 hours later, my husband came to me and apologized for the wrongs he did and promise never to do it again. Ever since then, everything has returned back to normal. Thank you Dr Unity for saving my broken Marriage and brought my husband back to me!".. I and my family are living together happily again. Dr.Unity is the best online spell caster that is powerful and genuine. If you have any problem contact him and i guarantee you that he will help you. Here’s his contact..Email him at: Unityspelltemple@gmail.com ,you can also call him or add him on whats-app:+2348071622464,you can also visit his website:https://unitysspelltemple.blogspot.com.