Federal trial may define the Benghazi facts!

MONDAY, OCTOBER 2, 2017

But first, such bullsh*t as this:
At first, the analysts cheered.

It's too late to make any difference, of course. But according to today's New York Times, a federal trial which is starting today may define what actually happened in September 2012 in the Benghazi attack.

Charlie Savage and Adam Goldman handled this morning's news report. At first, they had us cheering.

Upbeat headline included:
SAVAGE AND GOLDMAN (10/2/17): At Trial, a Focus on the Facts, Not the Politics, of Benghazi

Almost from the moment that Islamist militants overran the American consulate and assaulted a C.I.A. annex in Benghazi, Libya, in September 2012, politics consumed the deadly attacks. Using the event as partisan ammunition, Republicans and conservative media outlets sought to make the city’s name synonymous with Democratic scandal.

But beginning on Monday in a federal courthouse in Washington, prosecutors will put forward an account that focuses not on politics, but squarely on the attacks themselves
and a man they say bears direct responsibility: Ahmed Abu Khattala.

“The Benghazi case has been burdened with a lot of politics; now it is the turn of law enforcement, national security professionals and prosecutors to show the world what really happened,” said Carlos T. Fernandez, a former senior F.B.I. counterterrorism official whose agents investigated the attacks.
"A focus on the facts!" It's much too late to make a difference, but yay yay yay yay yay! This trial may help establish the actual facts concerning what really happened!

Unfortunately, our nation's mainstream newspapers tend to run, not on facts, but instead on script. In the passage shown below, Savage and Goldman return to the highly deceptive script which was established just a few days after the Benghazi attack. This script was used to massacre Susan Rice, then to take down Candidate Clinton:
SAVAGE AND GOLDMAN: The attacks crystallized Libya’s descent into chaos after the 2011 Arab Spring uprising, which, with help from NATO air power, had toppled the country’s longtime dictator, Col. Muammar el-Qaddafi.

Conservatives focused on such issues as why early Obama administration talking points inaccurately portrayed the attacks as a spontaneous protest rather than a premeditated assault. In time, the Benghazi attacks came to serve as shorthand for failures by Hillary Clinton, then the nation’s top diplomat, and President Barack Obama. Congress conducted multiple oversight investigations into Benghazi, including an inquiry by a House select committee that questioned Mrs. Clinton for 11 hours of public testimony about such topics as her use of a private email server while secretary of state.
On the one hand, it's true! That script about the Benghazi attacks actually did "come to serve as shorthand for failures by Hillary Clinton." But did the administration really "portray the attacks" in the way the Times reports?

We're sorry, but no, it didn't. Even as the New York Times asserts that the facts may emerge from the trial, Savage and Goldman just keep reciting the inaccurate GOP script.

Did the Obama administration "inaccurately portray the attacks as a spontaneous protest rather than a premeditated assault?" Did they portray the attacks that way at all?

As we've noted a million times, the answer in each case is no. That narrative quickly emerged from two highly influential Washington insiders—from Bob Schieffer of CBS News and Senator John McCain.

That portrait of the attack was attributed to Susan Rice. But it simply isn't what Rice said when she appeared on Face the Nation on Sunday, September 16, five days post-attack.

What did Susan Rice actually say on Face the Nation that day? Below, you see the relevant chunk of the actual transcript.

Schieffer had just finished speaking to Mohamed Magariaf, the president of Libya's National Congress. For perhaps the ten millionth time, let's see how well we can read and interpret a transcript:
SCHIEFFER (9/16/12): And joining us now, Susan Rice, the U.N. ambassador—our U.N. ambassador.

Madam Ambassador, [Magariaf] says that this is something that has been in the planning stages for months. I understand you had been saying that you think it was spontaneous? Are we not on the same page here?

RICE: Well, Bob, let me tell you what we understand to be the assessment at present. First of all, very importantly, as you discussed with the president, there is an investigation that the United States government will launch, led by the FBI that has begun.

SCHIEFFER: But they are not there yet.

RICE: They are not on the ground yet but they have already begun looking at all sorts of evidence of various sorts already available to them and to us. And they will get on the ground and continue the investigation.

So we'll want to see the results of that investigation to draw any definitive conclusions. But based on the best information we have to date, what our assessment is, as of the present, is in fact what—

It began spontaneously in Benghazi as a reaction to what had transpired some hours earlier in Cairo, where, of course, as you know, there was a violent protest outside of our embassy sparked by this hateful video.

But soon after that spontaneous protest began outside of our consulate in Benghazi, we believe that it looks like extremist elements, individuals, joined in that effort with heavy weapons of the sort that are, unfortunately, readily now available in Libya post-revolution. And that it spun from there into something much, much more violent.

SCHIEFFER: But you do not agree with [Magariaf] that this was something that had been plotted out several months ago?

RICE: We do not—we do not have information at present that leads us to conclude that this was premeditated or preplanned.

SCHIEFFER: Do you agree or disagree with him that al Qaeda had some part in this?

RICE: Well, we'll have to find out that out. I mean, I think it`s clear that there were extremist elements that joined in and escalated the violence. Whether they were al Qaeda affiliates, whether they were Libyan-based extremists, or al Qaeda itself, I think is one of the things we'll have to determine.
There you see what was actually said. Let's go over the scripted points found in today's New York Times.

Did early Obama administration talking points "portray the attacks as a spontaneous protest rather than a premeditated assault?"

You'll note that Rice didn't say whether the attack had been a "premeditated assault." She said the administration didn't yet know—that they would "want to see the results of [the ongoing] investigation to draw any definitive conclusions."

Did she say that the attack had been "a spontaneous protest?"

Actually, no. She said the events at the consulate had started as a spontaneous protest, but that "extremist elements" then came to the scene armed with "heavy weapons," thereby creating the deadly violence.

She didn't say that a gang of spontaneous protesters had suddenly taken the consulate down, the invented claim for which she was instantly ridiculing by Schieffer and McCain, then by everyone else. She said that had been done by "extremist elements"—by extremist elements who may have been "al Qaeda itself."

Please note one additional point:

In this morning's New York Times, Savage and Goldman seem to say that the administration said the assault wasn't "premeditated." As noted, Rice actually deferred judgment on that point, pending further information.

But please note this additional point:

Schieffer asked her if the assault had been "planned for months." That's what she was talking about when she said "we do not have information at present that leads us to conclude that this was premeditated or preplanned." She was saying that, as best they could tell at that time, this wasn't the fruit of a months-long plan, as Magariaf had charged (without offering any evidence).

As soon was Schieffer finished with Rice, he bought on McCain, the sainted truth-teller. Together, the two men quickly created a parody of what Rice had actually said.

That parody version of Rice's remarks has defined the conversation from that morning to this very day. Even today, two reporters from the Times are reciting that five-year-old script, in which the administration offered ridiculous initial claims.

Citizens, can we talk?

Our "meritocratic" journalistic "elites" are very unimpressive. They don't reezun or thinnk reel gudd. Despite their diplomas and their high self-regard, they tend to display very weak skills in the general realm of intelligence.

There is one skill they possess in spades—the skill that's involved in memorizing and reciting a script. Also, the skill that's involved in running away from a dangerous fight, as Rachel Maddow and everyone else did in the wake of the gong-show McCain and Schieffer created.

All that fall, the press corps threw Susan Rice under the bus; Maddow and them refused to fight, just as they did four years later in the matter of Comey the God. Eventually, the mocking script concocted by Schieffer and McCain was used to massacre Candidate Clinton.

Your "meritocratic" journalists are good at one thing—they're good at reciting script. Your millionaire, corporate cable liberals are good at running away.

The federal trial which starts today may define the actual facts very clearly. But even if it does, nothing—and we do mean nothing—will ever undermine that script. As we recently reminded you:

Back in March 2000, the Maria Hsia trial clearly established that Candidate Gore played no role in the fund-raising at "the Buddhist temple." But so freaking what?

Loudly and crazily, Chris Matthews kept shouting the opposite. As Matthews pimped his disinformation, earlier versions of Rachel Maddow turned tail and ran far away.

Donald J. Trump is president now. These are the people who gave us this gift.

Our journalists lack the most basic skills and the most basic toughness. But so does our sad rank and file.

9 comments:

  1. The point of this trial is not to determine the facts of what happened at Benghazi or what Susan Rice said, but to determine the guilt or innocence of a man accused of specific crimes.

    ReplyDelete
  2. What I hate about Hillary is that voice she gives you. That screeching voice

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Better trolling please.

      Delete
  3. There was the email, sent to the usual suspects, upon which the entire Benghazi! Benghazi! Benghazi! edifice was built.
    Susan of course, is U.N. Ambassador Susan Rice.

    From: ​Rhodes, Benjamin J.
    Sent:​​ Friday, September 14, 2012 8:09 PM​
    To:​​Vega,Dag; NSC Deputy Press Secretary; Plouffe, David; Pfeiffer, Dan, Carney,Jay; Palmieri, Jennifer; Earnest, Joshua R.; Govashiri, Ferial; Ledbetter, Howli J.; Selak, Dawn; Brundage, Daniel; Pelton, Erin;
    Alhassani, Mehdi K.
    Subject:​RE: PREP CALL with Susan: Saturday at 4:00 pm ET
    ​​​​RELEASED IN PART B6

    Goals:​​To convey that the United States is doing everything that we can to protect our people and facilities abroad;

    ​​To underscore that these protests are rooted in an Internet video, and not a broader failure of policy;

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. these protests


      Muslim Protests Spread Around the Globe

      Outrage in the Muslim community, stoked by a crude anti-Islam video mocking the prophet Muhammad, has spread across much of the globe today. Starting earlier this week in Libya, Tunisia, and Egypt, protesters stormed embassies,resulting in multiple deaths, four of them American. Since then, onstrations have erupted in more than two dozen countriesranging from small peaceful gatherings to violent attacks on western targets. Host nations have been struggling to defend western consulates after thousands took to the streets following Friday prayers. Gathered here are scenes of this growing unrest over the past few days.

      What was your point exactly?

      Delete
    2. Judicial Watch claimed this email “proved” the Obama administration was conspiring to hide the fact that they DIDN’T do what they could to protect their people, and that this email instructs Susan Rice and others to blame the whole thing on the movie trailer. This was the right wing’s “smoking gun” that launched 8 investigations, and created an immortal modern American myth.

      Delete
  4. Clinton, Rice, and Power were instrumental in destroying the most prosperous country in north Africa, killing tens of thousands of people in the process.

    Obviously, no imperial atrocity is ever opposed by the establishment, and so, if they are accused of some nonsense and vilified, so much the better.

    Benghazi, Benghazi, Benghazi!

    ReplyDelete
  5. Glorious be unto happy love spell the man who make me see reasons that there are still real and genuine spell casters like him. since 3 weeks now i have witness what is called heart broken. my boyfriend that promised me marriage failed me and impregnate me and leave,he dump me,he stop calling" he stop picking my calls,and he no longer respond to me. I have be looking for solution,I fall into the hands of fake spell caster,they rough me off and took my money without help.I have cried,I have weep"and tears runs out of eyes. the silentness in my heart brought me to the deepest path of failure that I lost my job. crying all day,because my life was lonely. so thanks to Dr happy who came into my life and brought me the greatest joy that was lost. i saw his web on happylovespell2@gmail.com while browsing and I contacted him, tell him what am passing through with no doubt because of what i saw about him,was enough to believe. and i was given words of solution on what to do. i can't really help thinking about it i have tried to see what i can do, i manage to provide him half of the money for the spell, and he help me with the rest. after casting the spell, 12hrs later, here comes my boyfriend with a rose flower on his hand and i was even about going out,i saw him in front of my door when he sees me he knee and said he is dying i should forgive him and accept him back he was crying,i can't wait to let him finish I quickly crab him and kiss him, just then" he said he is restless without me, just as the Dr happy said it will be. he brought out a ring and put it on my hand. our wedding day was scheduled,1 week after we got married. today makes it a month and we are living happily I don't know how to praise him enough, he has done me a thing i can never forget in my life. and i can't really share to myself alone, I want you all to help me praise him because if it wasn't for him, i already plan of committing suicide. but right now am now so happy more than i was before. if you fine it difficult to get your ex boyfriend back, contact him via..... email happylovespell2@gmail.com also add him on whats-app +2348133873774

    ReplyDelete