SAVING CANDIDATE HARRIS: Brilliant young scribes maintain tribal script!

FRIDAY, MAY 31, 2019

Harvard, Yale crash and burn:
With genuine sorrow, major anthropologists constantly say that our basic instinct is wrong.

When do these scholars chide us this way? They say it when we express our pique at the idea that a major White House campaign can be built around misstatements like these:
MELBER (5/20/19): Let's start with this. What does your plan do to combat the gender pay gap?

CANDIDATE HARRIS: Well, first of all, it is just a fact, right? So the reality of this is that we don't have to debate the point, which is that, on average, women make 80 cents on the dollar to men. If you're talking about African-American women, that's 61 cents. If it's Latinas, it's 53 cents.

So there is an obvious issue that we have around, not only disparities but fairness, and equal pay for equal work. So let's get beyond that because it's not a debatable point.

The question becomes, what are we going to do about it? And I think the goal, we would all agree, should be that people should be paid equally for equal work.

[...]

CANDIDATE HARRIS: Look, Ari, it's for real that that woman is getting paid 80 cents on the dollar. It's for real that that other woman is getting paid 61 cents on the dollar.

It's for real that that other woman is getting paid 53 cents on the dollar.
And she's sitting at her kitchen table in the middle of the night trying to figure out how she can pay her bills.

When she wakes up at the same time the next morning as the guy who was working in the cubicle next to her, she performs the same work, but she's not getting paid the same amount. That's for real too.
These scholars agree with us on one point. They agree that it's especially galling to see a major White House candidate repeating inaccurate claims, even while repeatedly saying that the claims in question are "for real" and "a fact," something that isn't "debatable."

"Major gods on Olympus are laughing at that," these disconsolate scholars say. They report to us from the grief-stricken years which follow Mister Trump's Feckless War.

Top gods on Olympus may laugh, but audible groaning takes place in the caves within which these top experts huddle. To these future anthropologists, it isn't funny when a leading candidate "misspeaks" about her own chosen issue on one TV program after another,with the occasional "slip of the tongue" thrown in.

Our future scholars don't think this is funny, since they know where this bullshit led. But they advise us to beat back our vast pique:

"The human being was wired for this," these disconsolate scholars now say. "Within the vastly limited species, it was all about the promulgation of pleasing tribal tales."

At any rate, no, Virginia! According to the Census Bureau statistics to which the candidate referred, women do not "make 80 cents on the dollar [compared] to men" for the same or equal work.

It wasn't true when Rachel said "77 cents on the dollar," then insisted that she'd been right all along (see yesterday's report). And it isn't true now when the candidate says it, ignoring innumerable fact-checks.

Everyone knows it isn't true, but we liberals love to say it! According to these future experts, it's our version of Bill Maher's new toy, the exciting new toy our brother Bill very much didn't want to break! See last Friday's report.

"This is the way the species was wired," disconsolate experts constantly tell us, speaking in the past tense. "You might as well complain about the fact that the sun tends to set in the west."

So this matter was fated to go, according to these future scholars. According to these anthropologists, this also explains the recent journalism of the top kids from Harvard and Yale.

As Candidate Harris announced her plan, she began misspeaking in various cable forums about the problem she vowed to defeat. And sure enough! At the nation's top publications, top youngsters swung into action:

"They were simply Saving Candidate Harris," one anthropologist said.

As the candidate discussed her proposal, she kept making baldly inaccurate statements about the problem she hoped to solve. As we noted last week, the bright young journalist Astead Herndon wrote this in the New York Times:
HERNDON (5/21/19): The most recent studies on the gender pay gap, which are not based on analogous work, show that women who work full time make 80 cents for every dollar paid to men, adding up to more than $400,000 in missed wages over the course of a woman’s career. The numbers are even worse for women who are also racial minorities—about $1 million in missed wages over a career for Latinas, Native American women and black women, according to an analysis by the National Women’s Law Center.
We've highlighted Herndon's key words, as we did last week. Using a slippery phrase no reader would ever decipher, Herndon said the studies in question "are not based on analogous work."

We can now tell you what that murky phrase meant:

These studies do not record, or pretend to record, the amount of payment received by men and women for the same or equal work. That key statistic—"80 cents for every dollar"—has not been adjusted for number of hours worked, or even for type of employment, or for other relevant variables.

As such, it does not record who much women are paid, as compared to men, for the same or equal work.

Similarly, these studies do not record, or pretend to record, what women are paid as compared to men "in the next cubicle" "performing the same work." But instead of saying that in English, Herndon and/or his unnamed editor decided instead to say this:

"The studies on the gender pay gap are not based on analogous work."

No Times reader knew what that meant. This afforded the Times a type of journalistic deniability:

The Times can claim that it reported the key fact about this matter, while knowing that none of its readers will realize that it did. In this slippery, skillful way, the Times was able to Save Candidate Harris and keep tribal script alive.

Herndon is one of the bright young kids the Times has hired to save on salary and to make a better appearance on cable. That said, he didn't go to Harvard or Yale.

Herndon is currently finishing his fourth year out of Marquette (class of 2015). Elsewhere, though, Harvard and Yale kids crashed and burned as they too "kept script alive." Let's start at the Washington Post, where Chelsea Janes (Yale 2012) reported the Harris proposal.

Janes is on the campaign beat fresh from several years as a Post sports reporter. Here's the way she described the problem Harris would solve:
JANES (5/21/19): Studies show that American women overall make 80 cents for every dollar paid to men. For African American and Latino women, the number is closer to 60 cents on the dollar. Statistics on comparable jobs vary.

“When you lift up the economic status of women, you lift up their families, their neighborhoods, and all of society,” Harris said, after telling voters at a Los Angeles rally Sunday that she would soon announce the plan. “And it’s an issue that’s been around for far too long without much progress at all.”

If elected, Harris said, she would require all corporations to receive “Equal Pay Certification” from the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. To receive the certification, companies would have to prove they are paying employees comparable pay for comparable work, regardless of gender.
Janes cited the familiar statistics which Harris keeps citing. She then wrote this:

"Statistics on comparable jobs vary."

As with the Times, so too here. Rather than cite the relevant statistics, in which women are underpaid perhaps 5 cents on the dollar (if that) for the same or equal work, Janes cited the more dramatic statistics, then added a murky disclaimer which no one would understand.

Or this could be her editor's doing. There's no way to know that.

Over at Vox, a Harvard kid was handed this task. Li Zhou (class of 2012) started off like this:
ZHOU (5/21/19): California Sen. Kamala Harris has a plan to close the gender pay gap, and it’s founded on hitting companies on one of their most prized markers: their annual profits.

As Harris’s plan is structured, companies with 100 or more employees would be required to disclose pay data to the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission in order to demonstrate that they’ve closed the gender pay gap between men and women who perform comparable roles. Companies that aren’t able to show they’ve achieved this would be penalized a percentage of their profits.

Her plan aims to fix a pervasive problem: Right now, women are still paid 80 cents on the dollar for what men make, on average, and it’s even worse among women of color. Latina women make 53 cents on the dollar, Native American women make 58 cents, and black women make 61 cents, according to a release from Harris. Those gaps have major implications for women’s economic success and their long-term earning potential.
To her credit, Zhou didn't bother to fake it. She simply said that, under the candidate's plan, companies would have to "demonstrate that they’ve closed the gender pay gap between men and women who perform comparable roles."

She then cited the standard statistics Harris keeps citing—statistics which don't measure amounts of pay for men and women "who perform comparable roles."

For the record, Harris' plan is not designed to fix the "pervasive problem" Zhou describes. Even if fully implemented, i would have little effect (though some) on that larger overall income gap. Zhou even cited "a release from Harris." all the while failing to note that the statistics it contains are not for "comparable" work.

Harris has been on a TV tour concerning this proposal. On this tour, she's constantly been "misspeaking," according to staff, even while committing the occasional "slip of the tongue."

In our view, progressives should be disgusted with candidates who do this. There are giant problems of economic looting to be solved, problems which don't require the invention of utterly bogus facts.

We'd like to see candidates, and the New York Times, address those actual matters of looting. Despondent future anthropologists tell us we're silly to think about that..

"This is just the way this deeply flawed species was wired," one sad scholar recently said, speaking in the past tense. "Hacks like Hannity conned the public about the way the rich were over-taxed. It fell to liberals and progressive to invent and promulgate pleasing group fictions about matters like this."

Let's be clear! As Zhou said, the income gaps cited above may in fact "have major implications for women’s economic success and their long-term earning potential."

How major are those implications? Is there any serious way to address them? That would be a worthwhile debate! That said, we liberals prefer to wander the countryside making claims which are baldly false. Everyone knows that our claims are false, but we love to make these claims, and also Script Never Dies.

At PolitiFact, Louis Jacobson plays the Sisyphus role. He keeps pushing the rock back up the hill. The candidate, and the bright young kids, ignore every word he says.

"This was all the species had," one sad scholar glumly reports. "Much as Professor Harari said, they went to Harvard and Yale to score the chance to advance the mandated fictions!"

That assessment struck us as harsh. And yet, this was a top future anthropologist, despondent yet a star in her field.

14 comments:

  1. "The human being was wired for this,"

    Meh. Don't worry about the human beings, Bob. We are fine, just fine.

    Better worry about the condition of your fellow zombies, of your liberal zombie death-cult. Yeah, think about it long and hard, dear Bob. If you can.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hello viewers around the Globe, I was despondent because i had a very small penis, about 2.5 inches soft and 4 inches hard not nice enough to satisfy a woman, i have been in so many relationship, but cut off because of my situation, i have used so many product which doctors for me, but none could offer me the help i searched for. i saw some few comments on the INTERNET about this specialist called Dr,OLU and decided to contact him on his email: Drolusolutinthome@gmail.com) so I decided to give his herbal product a try. i emailed him and he got back to me, he gave me some comforting words with his herbal pills for Penis Enlargement, Within 3 week of it, i began to feel the enlargement was surprised when she said that she is satisfied with my sex and i have got a large penis. Am so happy, thanks to Dr OLU I also learn that Dr OLU also help with Breast Enlargement Hips and Bums Enlargement etc.. If you are in any situation with a little Penis, weak ejaculation, small breast_hips_bums do get to Dr OLU now for help on his email (Drolusolutionhome@gmail.com) or add him on whatsapp line +2348140654426









































      Hello viewers around the Globe, I was despondent because i had a very small penis, about 2.5 inches soft and 4 inches hard not nice enough to satisfy a woman, i have been in so many relationship, but cut off because of my situation, i have used so many product which doctors for me, but none could offer me the help i searched for. i saw some few comments on the INTERNET about this specialist called Dr,OLU and decided to contact him on his email: Drolusolutinthome@gmail.com) so I decided to give his herbal product a try. i emailed him and he got back to me, he gave me some comforting words with his herbal pills for Penis Enlargement, Within 3 week of it, i began to feel the enlargement was surprised when she said that she is satisfied with my sex and i have got a large penis. Am so happy, thanks to Dr OLU I also learn that Dr OLU also help with Breast Enlargement Hips and Bums Enlargement etc.. If you are in any situation with a little Penis, weak ejaculation, small breast_hips_bums do get to Dr OLU now for help on his email (Drolusolutionhome@gmail.com) or add him on whatsapp line +2348140654426





























      Delete
  2. “Rather than cite the relevant statistics, in which women are underpaid perhaps 5 cents on the dollar (if that) for the same or equal work”

    “Perhaps” 5 cents? Citation? The politifact article that Somerby himself linked to a couple of days ago linked to a study by the aauw that calculated 7%, but then who’s counting? Aside from showing that Somerby didn’t bother reading the background info linked to in Jacobson’s politifact piece, it also shows a willingness to think in the aggregate. The number “5%” or “7%” (or whatever it “perhaps” is) is an average. For some professions and at some companies, the figure is higher, “perhaps” on the order of 20%. A woman making 20% less than a man doing the same work isn’t going to be placated by being told “hey, on average, it’s only “perhaps” 5% or 7%.”

    Somerby’s willingness to toss out that “perhaps” shows he isn’t concerned in the least with examining the true size of the gap and its impact on individual workers.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. @12:07 the study you mention calculated a 7% difference due to all factors other than the ones the study specifically accounted for. Discrimination is one such factor, but there are many others. That's why the word "perhaps" is appropriate.

      Delete
    2. Heaven forbid anyone should care to find out what it really is. Tossing off a “perhaps” ought to be good enough.

      Delete
  3. Let me preface this by saying that I personally don’t care what anyone thinks of Kamala Harris. That said:

    “We'd like to see candidates, and the New York Times, address those actual matters of looting.”

    Harris’s equal pay reporting requirement proposal is one proposal that she has to address a specific issue. When has Somerby bothered to examine all of her other proposals, and all of the other things she has said that do not deal with the gender pay gap? Never.

    Coming just two days after claiming he doesn’t care what anyone thinks about Biden, expressing concern that Biden might be the subject of Russian trolling, and urging liberals not to bite on this potential propaganda, here he is expressing disgust at another Democratic candidate and failing to give her a fair hearing.

    It should be noted that actual Russian propaganda seems to be targeting Harris among a few others:

    “The main targets appear to be Sens. Kamala Harris (D-Calif.), Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) and Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.), and former Rep. Beto O’Rourke (D-Texas)”

    https://www.politico.com/story/2019/02/20/2020-candidates-social-media-attack-1176018

    But don’t worry Bob. With your help, and the Russians, Harris will likely not be the nominee.

    ReplyDelete
  4. “Using a slippery phrase no reader would ever decipher,”

    Somerby is referring to the term “analogous work.”

    It is a favorite trope of Somerby’s that liberals are dumb. And his proof? His mere assertion that no New York Times reader would decipher the phrase “analogous work”. (Except himself, of course). And of course the report is therefore “slippery.”

    Somerby needs to fire his analysts and hire a logician.

    Has anyone called Somerby an ass lately?

    ReplyDelete
  5. “When you lift up the economic status of women, you lift up their families, their neighborhoods, and all of society,” Harris said, after telling voters at a Los Angeles rally Sunday that she would soon announce the plan. “And it’s an issue that’s been around for far too long without much progress at all.”

    Is there any evidence that supports this pleasing claim? In the 50 plus years of a push to "lift up the economic status of women," we've made much progress in that end, but how about the families, the neighborhoods, and society at large? As for the families, they've drastically shrunken or disappeared altogether. Single mother percentages have exploded. The neighborhoods have become deracinated and atomized, or in the case of many inner city black neighborhoods, dangerous and wholly dysfunctional. The society at large has become utterly divided into warring camps. The politics have become a sick parody of a functioning nation.

    Prior to all this lifting up of the economic status of women, it seems that women might have been fulfilling a role perhaps even more important that working in cubicles: that of maintaining familial and community bonds. It seems that the time away from that role perhaps isn't having the outcomes Harris claims.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Is there any evidence...look at the Nobel prize winning work of economist Amartya Sen.

      Delete
  6. Idiot women have to make up things to complain about.

    ReplyDelete
  7. If there is already equal pay, employers will have no trouble with Harris's legislation. If there is not pay equality, women will be helped.

    ReplyDelete

  8. ارخص شركة نقل عفش بالدمام ارخص شركة نقل عفش بالدمام
    شركة تنظيف منازل بجدة بالبخار افضل شركة تنظيف منازل بجدة


    شركة غسيل خزانات بالمدينة المنورة شركة تنظيف خزانات بالمدينة المنورة
    افضل شركة تنظيف منازل بالمدينة المنورة شركة تنظيف منازل بالمدينة المنورة

    ReplyDelete
  9. Real Voodoo Love Spell That Work Fast With 100% Guarantee Result to Get Your Ex Boyfriend/Girlfriend Back After Breakup/Divorce contact Unityspelltemple@gmail.com or call/whatsapp him +2348055361568.

    I'm Natasha Wanderly form USA

    Love spell from dr.Unity brought my husband back" After 12years of marriage, me and my husband has been into one quarrel or the other until he finally left me and moved to California to be with another woman. I felt my life was over and my kids thought they would never see their father again. i tried to be strong just for the kids but i could not control the pains that torments my heart, my heart was filled with sorrows and pains because i was really in love with my husband. Every day and night i think of him and always wish he could come back to me, I was really worried and i needed help, so i searched for help online and I came across a website that suggested that Dr Unity can help get ex back fast. So, I felt I should give him a try. I contacted him and he told me what to do and i did it then he did a Love spell for me. 11hours later, my husband really called me and told me that he miss me and the kids so much, So Amazing!! So that was how he came back that same day,with lots of love and joy,and he apologized for his mistake,and for the pain he caused me and the kids. Then from that day,our Marriage was now stronger than how it were before, All thanks to Dr Unity. he is so powerful and i decided to share my story on the internet that Dr.Unity is real spell caster who i will always pray to live long to help his children in the time of trouble, if you are here and you need your ex lover back or save your marriage fast. Do not cry anymore, contact this powerful spell caster Dr.Unity now. Here’s his contact,

    Email him at: Unityspelltemple@gmail.com ,
    Call/WhatsApp him: +2348055361568,
    Check is website:https://unityspelltemples.blogspot.com ,
    your kindness will never be forgotten.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Hello everyone, am very happy to share this little awesome testimony about Dr olu a great herbal doctor who help me enlarge my penis size.3.2 cm to 8.3 cm longer with his herbal cream mixture, my girlfriend is now so amazed with the autonomous size of my penis , if you you are also in need of help on how to enlarge your penis to become bigger and stronger I adverse you to contact Dr on his email (drolusolutionhome@gmail.com) ) you or contact on whatsapp number +2348140654426 because he is one of the best herbal doctor that i can only show you up to, if your penis is 4.2 cm and want to get it reach 9.2 cm within three weeks i Dr olu is also specialized on obey m breast and boobs enlargement i advise you to contact him for help


























    Hello everyone, am very happy to share this little awesome testimony about Dr olu a great herbal doctor who help me enlarge my penis size.3.2 cm to 8.3 cm longer with his herbal cream mixture, my girlfriend is now so amazed with the autonomous size of my penis , if you you are also in need of help on how to enlarge your penis to become bigger and stronger I adverse you to contact Dr on his email (drolusolutionhome@gmail.com) ) you or contact on whatsapp number +2348140654426 because he is one of the best herbal doctor that i can only show you up to, if your penis is 4.2 cm and want to get it reach 9.2 cm within three weeks i Dr olu is also specialized on obey m breast and boobs enlargement i advise you to contact him for help

    ReplyDelete