DOGMA AND TOWN: The essay concerned an important topic!

FRIDAY, MARCH 12, 2021

Must dogma prevail every time?: A funny thing happened to DeVitta Briscoe's essay after it was published online by the Washington Post.

(In print editions, the essay was given a prominent placement in last Friday's Post.)

In theory, the essay concerned an extremely important topic—shooting deaths, justified and otherwise, at the hands of police officers. 

That's an important topic! That said, the essay also concerned a key matter of dogma—an area within which almost anything goes in the streets of Our Town, and in our major news orgs.

Briscoe's essay concerned a deeply serious topic—police shooting deaths. More specifically, it concerned police shooting deaths in which the decedents are black and unarmed.

A person might think that such a serious topic would be treated with great care and great respect by upper-end mainstream journalists.

That might seem like an obvious thought. But a person who thought that would be wrong. 

Starting in 2012, police shooting deaths have become a key point of dogma here in the streets of Our Town. In repetitive acts of performative virtue, reporting has been reworked and reshaped to fit the jealous demands of preferred Storyline.

If the facts don't comport with preferred Storyline, then it's time for the facts to go! In newspapers like the Washington Post, such performance has become common over the past nine years.

This era of performative journalism got its start in the New York Times' initial news report about the shooting death of Trayvon Martin, a fatal shooting which occurred in February 2012. 

This initial news report in the Times included a gross misstatement of fact—an inflammatory, ugly misstatement which tracked to the legal team working on behalf of the Martin family.  In the next few days, the New York Times backed away from its blatant factual error. But to this day, the newspaper's gross misstatement of fact remain uncorrected online.

A few days after the initial Times report appeared, the Orlando Sentinel—the local newspaper of record—wrote that this Times report had stirred nationwide anger about this shooting death. You might say that the Times' news report was the start of a journalistic era. 

Below, you see the erroneous passage to which we refer:

ALVAREZ (3/17/12): As criticism of the police investigation mounts, so too do the calls for swift action in a case with heavy racial overtones. Protests grow larger each week, and lawyers for the family are now asking the Department of Justice to intervene...

The police in of Sanford, where the shooting took place, are not revealing details of the investigation. Late Friday night, after weeks of pressure, the police played the 911 calls in the case for the family and gave copies to the news media. On the recordings, one shot, an apparent warning or miss, is heard, followed by a voice begging or pleading, and a cry. A second shot is then heard, and the pleading stops.

“It is so clear that this was a 17-year-old boy pleading for his life, and someone shot him in cold blood,” said Natalie Jackson, one of the Martin family lawyers.

As would soon become quite clear, only one shot was fired that night. There was no possible warning shot, followed by what the Sentinel described as a "kill shot."

Only one shot was fired that night. But the New York Times' erroneous report had triggered nationwide anger and a nationwide Storyline:

The assailant had fired a warning shot, then he'd fired a kill shot. “It is so clear that this was a 17-year-old boy pleading for his life, and someone shot him in cold blood,” one member of the legal team had dramatically said, working from a blatant misstatement of fact.

We're sorry to have to tell you, but the same kind of conduct was involved when the Washington Post published last Friday's essay.  Nine years later, we saw it take center stage again:

A press corps culture which runs on acts of performative virtue in service to preferred Storyline. A press corps culture which subjugates journalism to dogma.

We've described the basic, remarkable problem with Briscoe's essay. Today, we won't go through it again. 

In our view, the problem here lies with the Washington Post, not with DeVitta Briscoe. The problem lies with the Post's repetitive acts of performative antiracism, part of a culture in which our upper-end mainstream journalists spit on the graves of the various people with whose lives they relentlessly toy.

For today, we will stress this one point—to appearances, Briscoe's grossly misleading essay had been shaped with great care. We say that for this reason:

It's abundantly clear that Briscoe's essay seems to turn on a basic assertion. The essay seems to turn on the (implied) claim that Briscoe's late brother, Che Taylor, was unarmed when he was shot and killed in February 2016.

It's abundantly clear that Briscoe's essay is shaped to convey that impression. But having said that, how odd! At no point is that claim explicitly made in the course of the essay. The impression is clearly conveyed, but it's never explicitly stated.

Quite plainly, it seems that Briscoe has made that claim. But she never explicitly does.

In various ways as slippery as this. the creatures who people our major news organs toy with the shape of the world. According to major anthropologists, they do so for these reasons:

They long to perform their great moral virtue, for readers and perhaps for themselves.

They long to show readers, and perhaps themselves, how deeply they care about matters of race. And so they play their ugly games, in which police officers will always have lied and in which the honored dead will always have been unarmed.

(CNN returned to this mandated Storyline this past Monday night, making an absurd factual claim as it did. See yesterday afternoon's report.)

Our news orgs will bow to this Storyline, in which the police will always have lied. Or in which the target of these creatures will be said to have fired two shots.

Online, you can still visit the New York Times news report from which we've posted that excerpt. One correction has been appended to that nine-year-old report. It corrects another error which tilted the field against the newly anointed target—against the man who was falsely said to have (heinously) fired two shots.

Within days, the Times had moved away from that factual error. Within days, its reports reflected the fact that only one shot had been fired.

But that initial misstatement has never been corrected. Even now, nine years later, that ugly claim from within the Crump/Jackson legal team still sits there, ugly and bold:

“It is so clear that this was a 17-year-old boy pleading for his life, and someone shot him in cold blood!" So said a member of the legal team, building her claim around a blatant misstatement of fact.

The New York Times reported that inaccurate fact, then quoted that ugly statement. Once again, we'll quote the late Woody Guthrie:

As through this world I've wandered
I've seen lots of funny men [sic].
Some rob you with a six-gun,
Some with a fountain pen.

Others rob you of understanding through rearrangement of facts. According to experts, they do so because they've never lifted a finger in support of racial justice in the entire course of their lives, and because they want to hide that fact from others and from themselves.

"That [they] would be good," they toy with facts and regurgitate Storyline. 

This sort of thing is now quite standard within the Washington Post. One thinks of Michele Norris' column, in which a wildly inaccurate claim about These White Medical Students Today remains—what else?—uncorrected. News orgs seem to feel they have a right to promulgate Storyline at the expense of mere facts.

They tell you their stories, and they never look back. Experts say that this is the way our human brains are wired.

A funny thing happened to Briscoe's essay after it was published online. The very first commenters said that he had clicked her links and had noticed some possible problems.

You can go to comments and check it out for yourselves. Some of his comments seem relevant to us, some of his comments do not.

That said, he had actually clicked the links and thought about what he had found. Did any editor at the Washington Post click the link Briscoe supplied in support of the apparent claim that her late broher had been unarmed?

Dearest darlings, use your heads! Storyline hung in the balance!

We'll close with one last observation:

A funny thing happened to the Washington Post five years before it published last Friday's essay. The newspaper's own Fatal Force site listed Che Taylor's shooting death—and it listed Taylor as a decedent who had been armed with a gun.

Five years later, the floundering paper have given prominent display to an essay which plainly implied something different. If some editor had clicked the link Briscoe provided in support of her blatantly obvious insinuation, that editor would have found that Briscoe's "source" seems to contradict that Storyline-mandated claim.

So it goes as we the humans beat on against the current. This is now the way we now play in Our Town. This involves one political point:

This afternoon, we plan to discuss a news report from this morning's Washington Post. As far as we know, it's a thoroughly competent news report about Our Town's "woke" culture.

A prediction! Tucker Carlson will open tonight's program with that news report. The key political point would be this:

Every time we behave in these ways, we're creating new Trump voters.

Joe Biden has been sensational so far, but will he be able to sustain it? Could our national politics really be bending back in a progressive direction?

Could Biden turn into the new FDR? We offer these winged words of warning:

A trial will soon be underway in Minneapolis. If the jury rules the wrong way, the arson will start again.

Politically, we Democrats have gained from the Capitol riot. Serious disorder in Minneapolis could quickly replace that framework. But every time we clown in the way the Washington Post did with last Friday's essay, we are creating the voters which will keep us from attaining a sustainable working majority.

Guthrie ended his song as shown below. His words may have modern relevance:

As through this world I've wandered
I've seen lots of funny men.
Some rob you with a six-gun,
Some with a fountain pen.

As through your life you travel,
As through your life you roam,
You'll never see an outlaw
Drive a family from their home.

You'll never see an outlaw drive a family from their home? Most likely, that isn't true any more, but we can tell you this:

You will see lots of upper-end journalists drive voters to Donald J. Trump. On the bright side, these journalists get to display their admirable personal greatness—their (performative) antiracism.

They get to perform a vast personal virtue—a vast virtue which doesn't exist. They'll tell you how wonderful Oprah was. They'll let you know how much they care about their new heroes, Meghan and Harry.

(They won't say a word about our nation's low-income kids and the schools they attend. These darlings don't visit such towns.)

They'll tell you a target fired two shots. They'll tell you that Che was unarmed.

In their accounts, the police officers will always have lied, even when they actually didn't. They'll throw such people under the bus. It won't even occur to them that this is something they're doing as they toy with the facts of the world.

This is one of the places those much-maligned Trump voters come from! In Our Town, we bumble ahead, convinced of our own moral greatness and, of course, of our unrivaled brilliance.

We believe what we're fed in the Post and the Times! No one could ever fool us!

Coming this afternoon: A preview of Tucker Tonight


28 comments:

  1. "Must dogma prevail every time?"

    Why, yes, definitely, when you're in a cult. And you, dear Bob, as we're certain you're well aware, are a member of the liberal-hitlerian cult.

    So, quit complaining, dear Bob. Stay in the cult and conform, or leave.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Try again.
      CARES Act benefits go to the people, not the Establishment.
      You're going to need better distractions than this lazy first-draft gibberish.

      Delete
    2. Hello, I am Theresa Williams After being in relationship with Anderson for years, he broke up with me, I did everything possible to bring him back but all was in vain, I wanted him back so much because of the love I have for him, I begged him with everything, I made promises but he refused. I explained my problem to my friend and she suggested that I should rather contact a spell caster that could help me cast a spell to bring him back but I am the type that never believed in spell, I had no choice than to try it, I mailed the spell caster, and he told me there was no problem that everything will be okay before three days, that my ex will return to me before three days, he cast the spell and surprisingly in the second day, it was around 4pm. My ex called me, I was so surprised, I answered the call and all he said was that he was so sorry for everything that happened that he wanted me to return to him, that he loves me so much. I was so happy and went to him. That was how we started living together happily again. Since then, I have made a promise that anybody I know that has a relationship problem, I would be of help to such a person by referring him or her to the only real and powerful spell caster who helped me with my own problem. His email: {drogunduspellcaster@gmail.com} you can email him if you need his assistance in your relationship or any other Case.
      1) Love Spells
      2) solution and cure to all sickness
      3) Herbal Cure for any disease/sickness
      4) Marriage Spells
      5) Pregnancy spell
      6) Breakup Spells
      7) Death spell
      8.) You want to be promoted in your office
      9) want to satisfy your lover 
      10) Lottery
      Contact this great man if you are having any problem for a lasting solution
      through {drogunduspellcaster@gmail.com}

      Delete
    3. DR AZIBA HERBAL MEDICINE is the natural male support formula designed to take your sexual performance to another level. This is the formula designed to combat against all sexual complications and erectile dysfunction. The supplement promotes healthy production of testosterone hormone in body that increases sexual desires and endurance, while helping you to perform harder and longer on bed. It reduces the fatigue levels and sexual decline caused due to aging and optimizes the sexual drives and arousal levels for peak performance on bed.
      DR AZIBA HERBS even focuses on increasing your circulation of blood across penile chambers. This increment in the circulation widens the blood vessels for increased holding capacity and this treats the root cause of ED in males. It reduces your fatigue levels and allows you to last longer with intense orgasms and better sexual drives. It also maximizes your sexual climax by allowing you to hold your ejaculation longer when performing on bed. Get in contact with DR AZIBA via Email: Priestazibasolutioncenter@gmail.com And WhatsApp him directly on +2348100368288.

      Delete
    4. DR AZIBA HERBAL MEDICINE is the natural male support formula designed to take your sexual performance to another level. This is the formula designed to combat against all sexual complications and erectile dysfunction. The supplement promotes healthy production of testosterone hormone in body that increases sexual desires and endurance, while helping you to perform harder and longer on bed. It reduces the fatigue levels and sexual decline caused due to aging and optimizes the sexual drives and arousal levels for peak performance on bed.
      DR AZIBA HERBS even focuses on increasing your circulation of blood across penile chambers. This increment in the circulation widens the blood vessels for increased holding capacity and this treats the root cause of ED in males. It reduces your fatigue levels and allows you to last longer with intense orgasms and better sexual drives. It also maximizes your sexual climax by allowing you to hold your ejaculation longer when performing on bed. Get in contact with DR AZIBA via Email: Priestazibasolutioncenter@gmail.com And WhatsApp him directly on +2348100368288.






      DR AZIBA HERBAL MEDICINE is the natural male support formula designed to take your sexual performance to another level. This is the formula designed to combat against all sexual complications and erectile dysfunction. The supplement promotes healthy production of testosterone hormone in body that increases sexual desires and endurance, while helping you to perform harder and longer on bed. It reduces the fatigue levels and sexual decline caused due to aging and optimizes the sexual drives and arousal levels for peak performance on bed.
      DR AZIBA HERBS even focuses on increasing your circulation of blood across penile chambers. This increment in the circulation widens the blood vessels for increased holding capacity and this treats the root cause of ED in males. It reduces your fatigue levels and allows you to last longer with intense orgasms and better sexual drives. It also maximizes your sexual climax by allowing you to hold your ejaculation longer when performing on bed. Get in contact with DR AZIBA via Email: Priestazibasolutioncenter@gmail.com And WhatsApp him directly on +2348100368288.

      Delete
    5. I am FRED and i want quickly recommend DR NCUBE for a Job well done by
      curing me from the genital herpes disease that have be giving me sleepless night. if you want to contact him, Simply do that via email drncube03@gmail.com or
      call/whatsapp +2348155227532
      he also have #herbs for
      #hiv/aids
      #cancerdisease
      #fibroid
      #diabetes
      He does all types of spell casting including love spell, marriage spell, promotion spell and fortune telling.
















      Delete
  2. "In repetitive acts of performative virtue, reporting has been reworked and reshaped to fit the jealous demands of preferred Storyline."

    There doesn't seem to be any way for a newspaper to agree that such deaths are concerning without having this kind of accusation lobbed at them.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Whatever your feelings about the Trayvon Martin case, it does not represent a shooting death in which a police officer shot an unarmed person. That means it is a bad example to illustrate a newspaper's performative virtue toward police shootings.

    Somerby thinks it is OK to use such "evidence" in support of the paper's failure to correct something said by Martin's family's attorneys, but this sleight of hand represents his own factual error -- which he perhaps thinks no one will notice. This is sloppy thinking and sloppy writing.

    ReplyDelete
  4. "The police in of Sanford, where the shooting took place, are not revealing details of the investigation. Late Friday night, after weeks of pressure, the police played the 911 calls in the case for the family and gave copies to the news media. On the recordings, one shot, an apparent warning or miss, is heard, followed by a voice begging or pleading, and a cry. A second shot is then heard, and the pleading stops."

    When Somerby excerpts from the newspaper, he helpfully highlights passages he wishes us to notice. (My cut and paste doesn't include those highlights.) The effect of such highlighting is that it makes it harder to notice other parts of the excerpt.

    Notice two things: (1) the first sentence says that the police have not released the 911 call to the public, and (2) the 911 call was played for the family and they are the source of the info about the two shots.

    This means that the paper itself did not have the opportunity to verify the information about the two shots independently. They are reporting what was told to them. This is factually what the family did say to the reporter.

    There is no need to correct this. The facts all remain true, this is what the family said to the reporter, and there was not access by the newspaper to the call. What should they correct? If they state that there was only 1 call, they have no evidence supporting that without access to the tape themselves. They did not have that. The report should stand as written.

    Somerby's attempt to camouflage this by highlighting the info about the shots instead of the info about the evidence, is misleading and obscures the relevant information, which is who said what.

    Somerby cannot know whether the family actually thought they heard two shots or whether they fabricated that info. This is another situation where one cannot know the contents of someone else's mind. Since the tape was played for the family by the police, the family may not have had the opportunity at that point to replay the tape and listen carefully. This may be their good faith recollection of what they heard. Such memories are notoriously flawed, but that doesn't mean they are faked.

    Somerby is wrong about this. That doesn't stop him from making all kinds of accusations, especially maligning this newspaper which did the right thing, given the circumstances.

    ReplyDelete
  5. "The problem lies with the Post's repetitive acts of performative antiracism"

    Somerby gives us one example from 9 years ago, a case that is not an example of police shooting, then he talks about Briscoe (who isn't actually a clear example of his complaint -- reference yesterday's comments), and he calls that "repetitive" performative antiracism?

    For one thing, where is the antiracism? And if the newspaper were taking care to make sure its reports were not racially biased, how is that performative and not actually antiracist?

    Or perhaps Somerby is calling this performative because he thinks the newspaper doesn't actually care about racism but is going through the motions to appear socially correct? How can he know that without access to inside reports about things said by editors and reporters that might reveal their true motives? He has no evidence whatsoever of the performative nature of anything these newspapers have done.

    But that doesn't stop him from making accusations. And if the paper were trying to engage in antiracism as a social good, why is that a bad thing? Somerby has not demonstrated that their facts are incorrect or that coverage has suffered. He has only made some specious complaints. Without showing that news coverage is being damaged by antiracism, he really has no case.

    ReplyDelete
  6. "The newspaper's own Fatal Force site listed Che Taylor's shooting death—and it listed Taylor as a decedent who had been armed with a gun.

    Five years later, the floundering paper have given prominent display to an essay which plainly implied something different."

    Notice how Briscoe's failure to make any statement about whether her brother was armed or not is turned by Somerby into an "implication" which she is then blamed for, as if she had made an incorrect statement.

    And notice how Somerby assumes that the newspaper (who he is criticizing for lack of factual accuracy) is correct when it classified Taylor's death as being armed, despite the gun being in the car and inaccessible to him when he was shot.

    Somerby is willing to extend Briscoe's remarks to include something she didn't say, and he is entirely uncritical when accepting a source, as long as it says what he wants it to.

    That shows a complete lack of debate integrity on Somerby's part. It suggests that he is just "out to get" these gun violence opponents (BLMers) and he doesn't care how he does it. Performative may not be the name for what Somerby writes today, but the adjective "biased" certainly fits.

    But Somerby long ago gave up on teaching "critical thinking" and now he just shills for conservative interests, including racial bigots and Trump supporters. Each year he becomes more obvious about it and less careful in how he reasons and uses evidence. He isn't even trying to appear rational and liberal any more.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. "and it listed Taylor as a decedent who had been armed with a gun."

      It is true that Taylor HAD BEEN armed, but he was not at armed at the time of his death.

      Somerby is slippery. You would have to visit the Fatal Force website and see whether he was listed as unarmed at the time of his death, despite having been armed previously. Somerby will never tell you if that is what they said -- and he doesn't say that the Fatal Force website is listing him as armed.

      Somerby is tricksy.

      Delete
    2. Here is what the Fatal Force website (2016) says about Che Taylor:

      "Seattle police were investigating a suspicious vehicle when they encountered an armed man nearby. Taylor was shot when appeared to reach for a gun in his holster. There are differing accounts of this shooting."

      Note that this does not state that he was armed, but it repeats the offers contention that they believed he was armed. The fact that no gun was contained in his holster means he was not in fact armed.

      The Fatal Force website notes the controversy about the facts of the shooting. That makes it dishonest for Somerby to claim what it says here substantiates his own version of what happened and whether Taylor was armed or not.

      Delete
    3. In fact, the names of 12 people appear when you limit the search to State=“Washington”, year=“2016”, and weapon=“Gun.”

      Taylor isn’t one of them.

      Delete
    4. Somerby cannot be trusted. You have to check everything he says.

      Delete
  7. "A prediction! Tucker Carlson will open tonight's program with that news report. The key political point would be this:

    Every time we behave in these ways, we're creating new Trump voters."

    Seems to me, Tucker Carlson is creating new Trump voters (although Trump has not said he is running again, Somerby seems convinced he will).

    Liberals are not going to be able to do anything to prevent Tucker Carlson from talking about whatever he wants. If we don't give him fodder, he just invents it. His lies may be worse than the occasional example pulled from the Washington Post.

    Somerby seems to be suggesting that liberals stop being liberal and doing liberal things because the Republicans will criticize them on Fox News. That makes no sense to me.

    Anyone who is convinced of anything by Tucker Carlson is never going to be a Democrat anyway. If Biden keeps doing good things, we aren't going to have any trouble convincing those with open minds to vote Democratic. Because there are more Democrats than Republicans, we don't have to convince Tucker Carlson fans, just the large number of moderate and independent voters, the ones who aren't suckered by conservative memes, much less the trivia that Somerby worries about.

    ReplyDelete
  8. "You'll never see an outlaw
    Drive a family from their home."

    This is not true. I just sold my home and received several warnings from the escrow company and my realtor about crooks who call and give you false wire transfer info so that your sale money goes into their account, not yours. That is fraud, theft, a con, and it is stealing. And it involves people's homes, and is so common that people receive multiple warnings about it as part of the sales process.

    Of course, Woody Guthrie intended his line to contrast small-time crooks with the banks who were foreclosing on people's homes curing the depression. He is comparing this legal process resulting from financial distress with the crime of robbery.

    Bank robbers were made into folk heroes during the depression because they robbed banks, who were disliked for their confiscation of people's farms and homes. There are numerous songs about Jessie James, Pretty Boy Floyd and similar robbers who supposedly stole from the rich and helped the poor (less evidence that they did much of this).

    So, Somerby takes Guthrie's song entirely out of context and uses it to support his shaky point, focusing only on the word "drive" and ignoring the rest of the song and its actual meaning to Guthrie and the people who it was about.

    This is a propaganda tactic, borrowing the warm fuzzy feelings liberals have about Guthrie and his songs, to apply to his own underhanded argument AGAINST liberal ideals and beliefs. Guthrie wouldn't have wanted this use of his music. Somerby is committing the real theft here.

    Volvo has been hearing a backlash because it used Seeger's "Hard times at the Mill" as the soundtrack for one of their car ads. Somerby is doing worse here -- using Guthrie to support an ideological position contrary to what Guthrie stood for. He needs to stop this shit.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Bob,
    I did not know until today that Zimmerman was a cop.
    Also you should have reminded your readers that Martin could have killed Zimmerman with the sidewalk (maybe by kneeing on his neck for 8 minutes).

    A good performance.

    ReplyDelete
  10. "One thinks of Michele Norris' column, in which a wildly inaccurate claim about These White Medical Students Today remains—what else?—uncorrected."

    Did Somerby write to the newspaper to correct Norris's claim? Is so, their judgment may be different than Somerby's about the inaccuracy of her claim. If not, then his purpose appears to be to discredit other writers using specious criticism, not to correct any newspaper record.

    Unless I hear otherwise, I am going to assume that Somerby does write to the papers each time he has a complaint, but they simply disagree with him and consider his complaints meritless.

    ReplyDelete
  11. “Somerby seems to be suggesting that liberals stop being liberal and doing liberal things because the Republicans will criticize them on Fox News. That makes no sense to me.”

    True. You guys do a yeoman’s job of policing yourselves and everyone else.

    https://taibbi.substack.com/p/the-sovietization-of-the-american



    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Taibbi's pulls Somerby's trick of conflating news reporting with an opinion piece. Ho hum...

      Delete
  12. How does it drive anyone to Trump to say that Biden is difficult to parody? Trump is difficult to parody too -- because he is a parody of himself. Do people vote for presidential candidates based on how difficult they are to parody? They shouldn't and I don't think they do. But Somerby does, for some bizarre reason.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymouse 1:38pm, try reading the blog post rather than just reading the comments.

      Delete
    2. Cryptic and incoherent, as usual.

      Delete
  13. This is one of your best posts Bob. Thanks.

    ReplyDelete
  14. "Others rob you of understanding through rearrangement of facts."

    In fact, I would say that there are often facts not in evidence. So it goes with MSM, which must report "breaking news."

    Leroy

    ReplyDelete
  15. DR AZIBA HERBAL MEDICINE is the natural male support formula designed to take your sexual performance to another level. This is the formula designed to combat against all sexual complications and erectile dysfunction. The supplement promotes healthy production of testosterone hormone in body that increases sexual desires and endurance, while helping you to perform harder and longer on bed. It reduces the fatigue levels and sexual decline caused due to aging and optimizes the sexual drives and arousal levels for peak performance on bed.
    DR AZIBA HERBS even focuses on increasing your circulation of blood across penile chambers. This increment in the circulation widens the blood vessels for increased holding capacity and this treats the root cause of ED in males. It reduces your fatigue levels and allows you to last longer with intense orgasms and better sexual drives. It also maximizes your sexual climax by allowing you to hold your ejaculation longer when performing on bed. Get in contact with DR AZIBA via Email: Priestazibasolutioncenter@gmail.com And WhatsApp him directly on +2348100368288.

    ReplyDelete
  16. It is a very hard situation when playing the lottery and never won, or keep winning low fund not up to 100 bucks, i have been a victim of such a tough life, the biggest fund i have ever won was 100 bucks, and i have been playing lottery for almost 12 years now, things suddenly change the moment i came across a secret online, a testimony of a spell caster called DR EMU, who help people in any type of lottery numbers, i was not easily convinced, but i decided to give try, now i am a proud lottery winner with the help of DR EMU, i won $1,000.0000.00 and i am making this known to every one out there who have been trying all day to win the lottery, believe me this is the only way to win the lottery. contact him via email: Emutemple@gmail.com call or whats app +2347012841542 Website: http://emutemple.website2.me/

    ReplyDelete