WHO WE ARE: An act of fraud which was exactly that!

TUESDAY MAY 13, 2025

McEnany misgenders: Frost wrote of "a house which is no more a house," located in "a town which is no more a town."

Right here, in our own present day, his formulation might be helpful. We Americans live in a nation which is no more a nation—a former nation serviced by public spokespersons who are no more any such thing.

To appearances, Tricia McLaughlin may be one such person. To his credit, Rep. Hakeem Jeffries (D-NY) has now said this about the Homeland Security spokesperson who seems to be something else:

Hakeem Jeffries Angrily Condemns ‘Joke’ DHS Spox For Threatening Arrests of House Democrats

[...]

Jeffries cut in, “It’s a red line. It’s very clear. First of all, I think that the so-called Homeland Security spokesperson is a joke. It’s a joke.”

For the full report from Mediaite, you can just click here.

Jeffries called McLaughlin a joke. Was he perhaps being kind? As we noted yesterday, this is what "the so-called Homeland Security spokesperson" told the world last Friday afternoon, in an official release:

Members of Congress Break into Delaney Hall Detention Center

NEWARK, NJ –Today, as a bus of detainees was entering the security gate of Delaney Hall Detention Center, a group of protestors, including two [sic] members of the U.S. House of Representatives, stormed the gate and broke into the detention facility. Representatives Robert Menendez, Jr. and Bonnie Watson Coleman and multiple protestors are holed up in a guard shack, the first security check point. 

“Members of Congress storming into a detention facility goes beyond a bizarre political stunt and puts the safety of our law enforcement agents and detainees at risk. Members of Congress are not above the law and cannot illegally break into detention facilities. Had these members requested a tour, we would have facilitated a tour of the facility. This is an evolving situation,” said Assistant Secretary Tricia McLaughlin. 

And so on from there.

In that initial release, McLaughlin misnumbered the numbers of Congress who were present on the scene. She did name two such members, including Rep. Bonnie Watson Coleman (R-NJ), who is eighty years old.

McLaughlin claimed that Rep. Coleman "stormed the gate and broke into the Newark detention facility." Also, she claimed that the two congressional reps were "holed up in a guard shack, the first security check point," even as she typed.

That was Friday, in real time. The following day, upon reflection, the "spokesperson" who seems to be something different made the story that much better in a statement to CNN:

DHS spokesperson threatens arrests of House Democrats who were at N.J. ICE facility

A spokesperson for the Department of Homeland Security on Saturday suggested the Trump administration could pursue arrests of the House Democrats involved in an incident at a New Jersey Immigration and Customs Enforcement detention facility on Friday and accused them of assaulting ICE officers.

“I think that we should let viewers know there will likely be more coming,” DHS spokesperson Tricia McLaughlin told CNN on Saturday morning.

“We actually have body camera footage of some of these members of Congress assaulting our ICE enforcement officers, including body-slamming a female ICE officer,” McLaughlin said.

[...]

She added that ICE was in possession of video evidence documenting the incident.

By now, McLaughlin almost surely knew that three (3) members of Congress had been present at the scene. By now, their behavior had become even more reprehensible:

"Some of these members of Congress" had actually "body-slammed a female ICE officer," McLaughlin now actually said. She added that ICE had video evidence which documented this unlikely claim. 

As of today, no such videotape has been provided. Question:

How likely is it that "some" (2?) members of Congress "body-slammed" a female officer before, or possibly after, they "holed up in a guard shack?" 

Presumably, Jeffries was (in part) denouncing McLaughlin for having made those claims. If anything, he may have been too kind in his assessment of McLaughlin

Below, we'll show you the pitiful way McLaughlin has now responded to what Jeffries said. First, we'd like you to see what Kayleigh McEnany said and did yesterday in a guest spot on The Five.

An utterly pointless bit of videotape had already been played. It "documented" exactly nothing. It was a strikingly brief piece of tape.

The various children of The Five began reciting on behalf of their corporate owners. But if McLaughlin had had no idea what she was talking about on Friday, McEnany may have been even more clueless a full three days later.

She was filling in for the dearly departed Judge Jeanine, who's been asked to serve in Washington. No more an actual person, McEnany actually offered what's shown below as that tiny bit of videotape continued to play on the screen:

MCENANY (5/12/25): ...I love the excuse given by Watson Coleman. She's one of the Congresspeople you're watching—or I think it's a "he." 

Whatever. I'm sorry if I misgendered.

But they said if there's any body-slamming kind of footage, that footage is manufactured for a certain purpose.

OK! So we're back to cheap fakes. "Don't believe what you're seeing." ....

What viewers were seeing was that very brief bit of videotape, in which no "body slam" exists. 

What we were hearing was a graduate of Harvad Law School who didn't have the first freaking idea what she was propagandizing about. Believe it or not, three days later, this was the state of her knowledge:

She seemed to think that Rep. Bonnie Watson Coleman, an 80-year-old woman, was actually someone named "Watson Coleman," who she seemed to think was a man! Three days after the incident in question, she seemed to have no earthly idea of what had occurred—but she did know what she was being paid to say about the events in question. 

As you can see on the videotape from The Five, McEnany was reading from what seemed to be her producer's notes as she tried to determine the gender of the congressional rep to whom she referred. It would be hard to be more clueless than this—or to engage in a more obvious act of fraud against the American people.

At one time, McEnany was a person. Also, she has no lack of basic smarts.

At one time, she was a person! As is often the case, the chase for celebrity, cash and conquest has left her no more a reliable human. She's a graduate of Harvard Law who now lives to repeat the claims she's handed by her owners.

Three days later, McEnany didn't seem to have any idea who she was talking about. That said, it can get even dumber and worse!  

As reported by Mediaite, here's the way McLaughlin has responded, this very day, to what Jeffries said:

DHS Spox Snaps Back After Jeffries, AOC Warn Against Arresting House Democrats...

[...]

McLaughlin said:

"I’d like to lay out the facts. The fact that it was these three members of Congress who trespassed, broke the law, and stormed that ICE detention facility. They put law-enforcement at risk. They put our detainees at risk and they put our staff at risk. Had they asked for a tour we would facilitated one for them, but there was no notice. And the fact that they put hands—body-slammed, body-rammed, pushed, shoved, whatever you want to call it, it was an assault on ICE agents and it’s unacceptable."

As of today, the three (3) members of Congress had "body-slammed ICE agents." Those agents are newly plural!

They'd still body-slammed those agents—or maybe they'd simply "shoved" them! With that, McLaughlin offered the watchword of the age:

It's whatever you want to call it!

Will someone please frog-march this former person away? Tribal fury being what it is, she seems like a reliable source no more.

Two final points: Many factual claims remain "undocumented" at this point in time, perhaps for the obvious reason. 

For example, did the three members of Congress really "storm the facility?" As she abandons her "body slam" claim, the public servant who's no more any such thing is clinging to that assertion!

As for the Harvard Law School graduate—in the course of one brief shining moment, she went from a "she" to an "it" to a "he" to a "they" as she tried to "gender" a certain member of Congress. All in all, she didn't seem entirely clear about what had actually happened.

Back then, she went to Harvard Law. Today, she's committing fraud against the American people as part of a discourse which is no more a discourse, within a broken, braindead land which is no more a land.

They're being paid to behave these ways. Over here in Blue America, our highly educated press elites maintain their magisterial silence.

At the top of Blue America's press, no one wants to report this state of affairs. Is all of this who we are?