SATURDAY, JUNE 7, 2025
Toughened employee talks: As with all major announcements, this week's top announcement was made on a Joe Rogan podcast.
Kash Patel announced a "great breakthrough." As explained in a news report by The Hill, it involves Dr. Fauci's phone(s):
Kash Patel claims ‘breakthrough’ in Fauci COVID origins probe
FBI Director Kash Patel said in an interview this week that his agency made a “breakthrough” as it continues to investigate former National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) Director Dr. Anthony Fauci, a key player in the U.S.’s early response to the COVID-19 pandemic.
At the same time, Patel cautioned Fauci’s critics from expecting too much.
“We just had a great breakthrough this week on Fauci,” Patel told podcaster Joe Rogan in an episode of “The Joe Rogan Experience” released Friday, explaining the FBI had recovered phones used by Fauci early in the pandemic.
“They had always been looking for phones and devices he used while he was back in Trump one [the first Trump administration] during COVID, and nobody had found it until two days ago.”
So said the director, speaking to the oracle. According to that news report, the gumshoe added this:
“Everybody listening to us shouldn’t jump to the conclusion [that] everything’s in there,” he added. “Maybe it’s deleted, maybe it’s not, but at least we found it, and at least now we can tell people that we have been looking because it is of public importance.”
President Trump and his allies have long accused Fauci of misleading the government on its handling of the pandemic and hiding the origins of the COVID-19 pandemic.
For ourselves, we'd add a second word of caution:
People "shouldn’t jump to the conclusion" that anything will be found in Dr. Fauci's phones! For whatever reason, Patel was floating a possibility before he had anything of substance to offer.
In truth, "President Trump and his allies" have made poisonous accusations against Fauci down through the many long years. In this earlier report from The Hill, Senator Paul (R-Ky) is quoted saying that Dr. Fauci contributed to one or two million deaths and should be in prison.
(Headline: Rand Paul says Fauci should ‘go to prison’ over COVID-19 ‘dishonesty.’)
So it frequently has gone—and so it went this morning.
That report about the FBI's "great breakthrough" is where the three friends on Fox & Friends Weekend started things off today. All in all, it was a bit of a replacement cast:
Fox & Friends Weekend / June 7, 2025
Charlie Hurt: regular co-host, Fox & Friends Weekend
Lisa Boothe: Fox News contributor
Brian Brenberg: childhood friend of Pete Hegseth
Early in the 6 o'clock hour, the makeshift cast turned to the FBI's "great breakthrough." We thought it might be important for you to see what Lisa Boothe said.
By now, it was 6:15 a.m. We know of no reason to think Boothe had the slightest idea what she was talking about, but she was now talking this:
BOOTHE (6/7/25): I would say this is a guy who intentionally lied to the American people. It's so obvious. It's just common sense.
We know he had that phone call with top virologists in February 2020, pushing it was naturally occurring, even though everyone with a brain knew from the beginning it escaped from the lab that was working on coronaviruses in China with a shoddy history of, you know, their practices there.
So everyone knew from common sense that that's what took place. Yet he lied to the American people because, guess what, NIH was involved in that gain of function research, and he was culpable, so—
And by all that, we had so many people couldn't say goodbye to their loved ones. We had so many businesses—he crashed the economy. He ruined lives in isolation. People committed suicide. They drank themselves to death and did drugs because they were so depressed.
So that guy, because of his lies, destroyed America for a large part—
BRENBERG: We'll see what the phone tells us.
BOOTHE: We're finally getting our footing again—
BRENBERG: We'll see what the phone tells us.
BOOTHE: Yeah, well, I don't need his phone to know that he's a terrible human being.
Dr. Fauci, looking at you, buddy! Anyway—OK, sorry.
HURT: Good stuff.
BOOTHE: Yeah.
"Dr. Fauci, looking at you," the fearless contributor barked. "Good stuff," the pathetic Charlie Hurt said.
Our general assessments would go like this
Hurt strikes us as one of the dumbest all Fox News Channel employees. We'll guess that Brenberg knows better than what was being said.
We'll also guess that Boothe may be one this channel's most changed performers and friends:
For years, it seemed to us that Boothe was mainly cast on this channel's programs as the telegenic younger woman who would smilingly agree with everything everyone said. During that era, it seemed to us that she was mainly called to the channel's sets to provide a pleasant type of window dressing / group assent.
As we've noted several times in recent months, Boothe's persona seems to have been substantially toughened during this second Trump term.
(We get the same impression concerning the evolving tone of Fox News Channel contributor Joey Johnny Jones. No more Mr. Nice Guy there!)
Does anyone believe that Boothe knew what she was talking about as she delivered that takedown of Dr. Fauci? As she explained what "everyone with a brain" has known, all along, about the origin of Covid?
In our view, she was engaging in overtly dangerous behavior in this early morning tirade. In fairness, sometimes a person has to engage in such dangerous conduct to retain a high-level, high-salary job.
During the program's first half hour, Boothe and Hurt kept citing "common sense," a new Trump branding element. Boothe offered a poisonous account of what "everyone with a brain" knew by 2020—failing to note that opinion about Covid's origins is still strongly split among this country's intelligence agencies, most of which have stated their divergent views only with "low confidence."
At one time, it would have been impossible to imagine someone behaving this way on one of this failing nation's major TV programs. Today, a person may have been told that she's going to have to behave this way if she wants to hold onto her job.
This morning, Boothe was spewing a dangerous brew, with at least one of her friends cheering her conduct on. Now for the rest of the story:
The New York Times won't report, and won't discuss, this endless grisly conduct. Neither will the timorous Mediaite. Neither will the stars who service Blue America through the auspices of MSNBC.
Our own Blue America's gruesome elites have agreed to avert their gaze from the poison the Fox News Channel emits. This morning, the poison was flowing freely.
It was 6:15 a.m.!
“ We know of no reason to think Boothe had the slightest idea what she was talking about, but she was now talking this:”
ReplyDeleteSomerby is an educated person. Is there any reason he wouldn’t write:
“She was now saying this…”
Or “She was now talking like this…”?
And doesn’t Somerby know better than to call a young woman “window dressing” simply because she is young and pleasant? Next he’ll call her “eye candy”.
Yes, they hate Fauci. What’s new about that?
We have all heard of Dr Fauci, he helped navigate us through Trump mishandling the pandemic, but as far as Boothe and the others mentioned, most of us have never heard of them.
DeleteThanks Somerby? I guess? I mean it can't hurt to know the names of obscure lunatics.
The detailed way Somerby talks about these people's personalities and their story arcs remind me of how certain kids in middle school would discuss comic book characters and argue over their attributes.
Nerd out, Somerby! Let your freak flag fly!
Seems you missed my point, which was that Somerby treats young women disrespectfully.
DeleteNo I got your point, agree with it, didn't have anything to add since you stated it well, so went off on a tangent, sorry if I comment-bombed.
DeleteSomerby treats young women disrespectfully.
DeleteSomerby is commenting on someone who is thoroughly ignorant and offers bizarre opinions. No respect is owed here. He talks about Gutfeld in a similar fashion, which is entirely justified.
That reminds me. Whatever happened to the witness that was going to nail the coffin in the Biden crime family? You know, the one that every Republican in Congress was talking about when they weren't admiring Hunter Biden's dick? The highly reliable one that was always somewhere else, being a Russian asset and all ? Maybe he can weigh in on this Fauci issue. To give them a little more credibility.
DeleteHe was trampled by elephants in the same horrible circus fire in which the evidence of the stolen election was incinerated.
DeleteWhat are the chances?
110% - believe it buddy.
Delete6:36 yes
DeleteIlya, then mock her ignorance, not her looks.
Delete""And doesn’t Somerby know better than to call a young woman “window dressing” simply because she is young and pleasant?"" Agreed, pissant works more better.
Delete
ReplyDelete"This morning, the poison was flowing freely."
Keep watching, Bob. And stop whining: good strong medicine is supposed to be bitter. Who knows, watching Fox News Channel all day every day for a few years may, in the end, cure your TDS disease, and your other tics perhaps. I'll keep my fingers crossed.
What a trumptard.
DeleteCope, Soros-bot.
Deletemmmm so edgy with your antisemitism.
DeleteWith Repubs in power, I guess it is in vogue.
Cope, Soros-bot.
DeleteYou cope, Jew-hater.
DeleteCope, Soros-bot.
DeleteTriggered.
DeleteI know. You're always grouchy after your afternoon enema, Mr. Soros.
DeleteMaking fun of people who need enemas is mocking the disabled. There is that typical right wing lack of empathy.
DeleteThat's what you always say before your morning enema, Sir. But you should hear yourself after your morning enema, at about 8:30am, Mr. Soros.
DeleteI have access to David in Cal's federal tax returns for the last 15 years, if anyone is interested in looking at them.
DeleteI feel a connection to Dr Fauci since he was trained by a friend, Dr. Don Louria. However, based on what we know now, there’s a good chance that Fauci funded research into gain-of-function research at the Wuhan lab, because it was not allowed in the United States. And a good chance that this research led to covid, which escaped due to Chinese carelessness.
ReplyDeleteI feel a connection to David in Cal since I have a friend/cousin/wife/former classmate/etc that also lies about their connections, just like David does.
DeleteCool story, DiC.
LOL!!!!!!!
"...based on what we know now, there’s a good chance that..."
DeleteOr, in other words, we don't know, but it pleases you to assume. And what exactly is a "good chance"? Is a 5% probability a good chance? Thirty percent?
This has all been investigated thoroughly and the gain of function research had nothing to do with covid. Fauci has discussed this many times.
DeleteWhy the pardon?
DeleteTrump's penchant for misguided vengeance and lawfare.
DeleteDuh.
Projecting much, Soros-bot?
DeleteUnlikely.
DeleteSoon, Rep. Jasmine Crockett will be president and this nightmare will be over.
DeleteShow me the zoonotic evidence and I'll go down on you.
Deletehttps://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMp2305081
DeleteParagraph 6
Since the lab is over ten miles distant, and the wet market is in the first cluster of cases, I go with mysterious Chinese lab trying to kill their own people. Not transmitted from the wet market. That's toots fucking crazy man. Do the maths! I have had nine booster, I speak to God man. And this is how you fruitcake Trump cultists sound to me.
DeleteQuaker - My percentage probabilities step by step
DeleteCovid came from carelessness at Wuhan Lab 99
Covid came from gain of function research 60
Fauci funded some GOF research at Wuhan 100
Covid came from GOF research funded by Fauci ????
Carelessness at the lab? Not proven and most US intelligence agencies say it didn't happen that way.
DeleteCovid came from GOF research? Not proven and most US intelligence agencies say it didn't happen that way.
Fauci funded some GOF research? Unproven and even the scientists debating it have a hard time defining exactly what qualifies as "gain of function." In any event, it hasn't been shown that any funding awarded to EcoHealth by the NIH and passed through to the Wuhan lab was used on any research related to the Covid virus.
More:
"An article published in Nature Medicine in March 2020 said that the virus likely originated through 'natural selection in an animal host before zoonotic transfer,' or 'natural selection in humans following zoonotic transfer.' The researchers, who analyzed genomic data, said SARS-CoV-2 'is not a laboratory construct or a purposefully manipulated virus.' While they said an accidental laboratory release of the naturally occurring virus can’t be ruled out, they said they 'do not believe that any type of laboratory-based scenario is plausible.'”
https://www.factcheck.org/2021/05/the-wuhan-lab-and-the-gain-of-function-disagreement/
For someone who often claims that he "doesn't believe anybody" and likes to look at the facts for himself, you did a poor job on this.
Two facts are beyond dispute:
Delete1. The Wuhan Institute of Virology was the premier center in China for studying coronaviruses including “novel” bat-borne strains.
2. In 2018, they began operating mainland China’s first lab specifically designed for studying the most dangerous pathogens including high-risk coronaviruses, which made safety essential and the consequences of any safety failure, by definition, catastrophic.
Not saying any of these are connected but three facts are beyond dispute:
Delete1. The premier lab in China for studying novel coronaviruses was based in Wuhan China
2. This Wuhan China lab began to do dangerous experiments on the novel coronavirus in 2018
3. A novel coronavirus originated in Wuhan China in late 2019, causing a global pandemic killing 7 million people
Jesus Quaker, you're using a four year old factcheck.org article that sites the “The Proximal Origin of SARS-CoV-2” paper as a source that the virus didn't come from a lab? Are you serious? Dude.
Delete9:54. There is ample, much more recent discussion of the claims that the virus was genetically altered to gain function in the lab and accidentally leaked from there. Wikipedia has a lengthy summary regarding the lab leak theory. These contentions were given their most traction by Republicans in Congress early in the pandemic even when our intelligence agencies rejected them. There is a lot to digest in the science of this virus, which makes it an easy target for politically motivated attacks that sound plausible in their simplicity. Commenters here promoting the gain of function lab leak theory and that Fauci is a criminal are in opposition to the majority of scientists on this subject. Try this:
Deletehttps://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10117112/
A majority of scientists on the subject benefit professionally and financially from a conclusion it was not a lab leak and would face severe, field-wide repercussions if it was from a lab. The fallout from the “Proximal Origin of SARS-CoV-2” paper you pathetically mentioned as a source shows how professional stakes can shape these scientists messaging. Please stop running to the internet to try to make points about a subject you don't know anything about.
Delete@9:54 What do you think has changed since that paper was published?
Delete"A majority of scientists on the subject benefit professionally and financially from a conclusion it was not a lab leak"
DeleteStop being ridiculous.
1:15. Let's start with your last sentence. You know nothing about my credentials. A favorite theme of conspiracy theorists, who haven't any exposure to how science is done or what motivates the people who do it, is exemplified in your first sentence. Go ahead and explain how worldwide scientists would face "severe field-wide repercussions" for localizing the viral strain to a Chinese lab. What bullshit. But please entertain us with how that would occur across continents. For a good laugh. And when you're done, go ahead and start in on climate scientists.
DeleteIf it was found to have been from a lab there would be vast funding and regulatory cuts for any work involving high-containment or gain-of-function studies, the trust the public has for the scientific community and what they say about their work would be critically undermined, the legal and liability insurance implications and costs for virology labs would skyrocket. I could list at least 30 more reasons a lab leak revelation would severely affect all virology researchers. Stop pretending like you know anything about this topic. We get it. You don't like Trump. That's OK! It doesn't mean you have to die on the hill of the natural spillover narrative.
DeleteIt seems like a fundamental difference between this weird new version of rich, white, race-bating Democrats and the rest of the world is a naivete about powerful institution's propensity to lie to the public.
DeleteProbabilities are estimated from actual occurrences, not made up like David does.
Delete2:37 Oh, I see, so this would be the first leak of biologically dangerous material from a "high containment" facility resulting in multiple human deaths. You might want to look that one up. Specific to this case, analyzing genetic material for alterations that would be more or less likely to conform to the result of human activity versus natural selection and publishing those sequences would in what way be subject to your conspiracy theory? You are aware that there was a moratorium on US funding for gain of function studies under Obama in 2014? And that Obama authorized monitoring for such pandemic outbreaks after the Ebola outbreak? And you are aware that the moratorium was lifted in 2017 under Trump who later defunded the monitoring unit local to Wuhan, before the outbreak? The research community did not come to a crashing thud after Obama instituted the moratorium, and various researchers in the field publicly welcomed it. Your narrative of a lock step scientific community protecting its own interests is the kind of bullshit one would expect from someone whose experience in that realm ended laboring over a Bunsen burner in high school. So go ahead and favor us with your 30 other reasons why scientists are conspiring against fact, just for grins. And I get your anti science narrative, it's a Trump cult thing.
Delete"And you are aware that the moratorium was lifted in 2017"
DeleteBy Fauci (NIH), surely? But never mind, Fauci was pardoned by your cult's leader Autopen.
Giving Mao COVID was one of the best things I've done in the last 10 years.
DeleteWalking freely, because Mao is too big of a clown to catch me, is a bonus.
5:44. Here are your lockstep scientists, dumbass:
DeleteIn 2014, several breaches of protocol at US government laboratories brought matters to a head. The news that dozens of workers at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) might have been exposed to anthrax, that vials of smallpox virus had been left lying around in an NIH storeroom, and that the CDC had unwittingly sent out samples of ordinary influenza virus contaminated with H5N1, shook faith in the country's biosafety procedures. Over 200 scientists signed the Cambridge Working Group declaration arguing for a cessation of experiments creating potential pandemic pathogens “until there has been a quantitative, objective and credible assessment of the risks, potential benefits, and opportunities for risk mitigation, as well as comparison against safer experimental approaches”.
Embarrassing. Pathetic.
DeleteSo, the moratorium on "gain of function" was lifted by Fauci. Fauci was pardoned by your cult's Leader Autopen.
DeleteAnd this triggers you and you fellow Autopen cult members. Nice.
Trump never uses an Autopen, does he, you dumb sonofabitch.
DeleteLose their funding if??? Where you been the past four months? Project 2025 wants to kill billions of poor, they don't need no lab leak bullshit to destroy medical research and funding. Already done. As the dirty filthy fascists say, the worse, the better.
DeleteMao is dead, long live Mao.
DeleteThe fact - alone - that Patel believes something tells you it's not true.
DeleteI have a connection to stupid since I read David's posts confirming he knows DiC.
Delete10:50: You are reduced to making shit up, much like your cult leader. Go ahead and provide the link about Fauci ending the gain of function moratorium. What an embarrassment.
Delete
DeleteFauci (NIH) lifts the moratorium on "gain of function". Then COVID-19. And then Fauci is pardoned by your cult's Leader Autopen!
This is an odd sequence of events, Soros-bot, isn't it?
Go ahead and link to the article stating that Fauci lifted the moratorium, dumbass. The NIH is not a fascist organization, like the White House. Fauci was head of NIH when the ban was placed and when it was removed. Decisions regarding policy are made solely by your ignorant idol in the White House, but in well run organizations policy is made by groups of experts after review of risks/benefits. But go ahead and show us where the ban-lifting was engineered by Fauci. Then again, maybe they will find that on his phone, after they release the Epstein files.
Delete
DeleteAll I can tell you, Soros-bot, that I find it odd that Fauci was pardoned by your cult's Leader Autopen after killing 7 million people by lifting the moratorium on "gain of function".
But then your Autopen cult is so fucked up that killing 7 million people means nothing to you.
Go ahead and link to the article citing Fauci as the person that lifted the moratorium. Biden pardoned Milley and the January 6 panel as well, in a stated pre-emptive manuever against a vindictive and irrational codger. There is nothing the grifter in chief has done since his inauguration that suggests he wouldn't have come after these people, having publicly threatened them. But now that Patel has Fauci's cell phone we can certainly expect a major breakthrough on par with the Epstein files. Go ahead and hold your breath in anticipation, maggot.
DeleteWe Autopen cult members must defend Master Fauci to the end. As ordered by Autopen, The Prophet.
DeleteYesterday, Trump announced his new policy towards Russia's invasion of Ukraine: let them fight out it.
ReplyDeleteBwahahahahahahahaha!
Who knew?
Art of the Deal, my brother/sister. It took Trump only four months to come up with a brilliant plant that no one saw coming.
Delete
ReplyDeleteSo, it seems likely that Fauci killed 7 million people. A bit more. Hasn't exactly murdered them, more like manslaughtered. Quite a lot, but not the guinness world record.
But idiot-Democrats adore him, and their dear leader Autopen pardoned him. Fair enough; end of story.
Fauci did not cause covid.
DeleteCope.
DeleteOk.
DeleteTrump.
DeleteTard.
DeleteSeven million man. Dude. Wow wee wowser man. You a smart fart. Trufes.
DeleteTrump is now underwater on immigration with the general public, and deeply underwater with Hispanic voters, also underwater on the economy, etc, as Dems are winning elections in red areas all over the country and the rats are abandoning the Republican sinking ship.
ReplyDeletewomp womp
No, sadly, the cruelty is a winning formula for fascists sadly. The moron also is getting credit from the morons of Fox News et al for reducing problems he created out of whole cloth, ie tariffs and brown people. As this thread demonstrates, their is absolutely no reasoning with these fascist turds trained by right wing news that their hatred of brown skin is all that matters. Due process?, who needs that. Fuck the brown skins. Winning! Fascist scum. Fuck em.
DeleteEasiest way to make money: short sell TSLA.
ReplyDeleteRepublican U.S. Rep. Blake Moore told reporters that, behind the scenes, many were skeptical about the bold claims of the world’s richest man.
ReplyDelete"Most everybody knew Elon was exaggerating what he could do," Moore of Utah told reporters outside the Capitol on Thursday. "He was claiming to find $4 billion a day in cuts he was going to get. One time, he said $2 trillion, he was going to find."
"It's a massive exaggeration, and I think people are recognizing that now," he added.
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/musk-doge-spending-cuts-blake-moore-b2765700.html
Why is interesting what some congressman no one ever heard of reportedly told reporters?
DeleteBecause the ones you’ve heard of are afraid to be honest.
Delete@3:19 Rep. Moore is the leader of the so-called "DOGE caucus" in Congress.
DeleteNow, shoo!
So, the third co-chairman of the "DOGE caucus" reportedly opined that Elon Musk was, at some point, "exaggerating what he could do".
DeleteAnd you find this interesting, because..?
By the way, I think I heard Donald Trump saying the same thing (that it won't be $2 trillion) months ago.
Whoever heard of fascists lying to the runes for effect? Why GOP runes are way to sleazy, I mean swarthy to fall for bullshit. I mean just look at their lab leak theorists, totally not fucking bonkers man. RFK is right!!!
DeleteFucking fascist spell check.
DeleteI love how Democratic strategists are trying to get people to think economic anxiety is a central, driving force behind young men’s alienation from the Democratic Party. Nice try. It's because they are all racists.
ReplyDeletehttps://www.politico.com/news/2025/06/03/democrats-young-men-study-00384370
That means Democrats who spent years mocking voter's fears of economic anxiety were not only factually wrong but also were helping destroy the party’s credibility with a critical constituency. Really dumb move.
DeleteAnd sexists.
Delete“All young men, all of them, are racists and sexists!” seems to embody the essence of bigotry.
DeleteNot all, mostly the Christians who never quote Christ for some reason...
DeleteYoung men who are alienated by woke are misogynists by definition (supporters of patriarchy). All of them, or they wouldn’t find woke threatening.
DeleteWoke = the values Christ taught. Funny that.
DeleteNot taking economic anxiousness amongst Trump voters seriously, and actually mocking it, was a huge missed opportunity for Democrats. It weakened the party's credibility with young men, possibly for decades. Democrats who did the mocking showed arrogance and insensitivity that will now make the course correction extremely difficult and costly. They would benefit from understanding that groupthink and echo chambers can allow a misguided consensus views to go unchallenged until they explode in your face, as we are seeing here.
DeleteRight because nothing says ignoring economic anxiety by deftly lifting the country out of Trumps disastrous first term economy, restoring jobs to their highest sustained level in 50 years, and controlling inflation. Punching down on lower castes has nothing to do with it. Racist idiots, every one of you.
DeleteThat can be part of President Crockett's campaign message: the economy is great, buying a home and saving for kids’ college is easy and you're all racists.
Deleteif the entire modern Conservative movement wasn't so busy beating off to photos of hunter Biden's penis, Fauci would already be in prison.
ReplyDeleteDNC Chair says in leaked audio: “I don’t know if I wanna do this anymore.”
ReplyDelete
ReplyDeleteMore word-salads with the word "fascists" in them is the ticket! That's how we win! Any day now!
Easy for you to say you Nazi bitch.
Delete86 47.
DeleteBecause making up BS reasons to unconstitutionally deploy US forces against demonstrators is totally not fascist, you fascist prick.
Delete
DeleteSqueal louder, Soros-bots.
Fascist harder Nazi scum.
DeleteBeing grouchy after your afternoon enema again, Mr. Soros?
DeleteSomeone really likes thinking about an old man's enemas.
DeleteUnlike the previous disaster that was Trump, he now is surrounded by Defense, Justice, State, etc. Secretaries all in on shooting demonstrators using US military forces. You libtard hosers whining about fascism. Why da crying bitches. We had Hungary host CPAC cause it's the way we do things now. Suck on this.
DeleteSounds like someone gave George Soros his afternoon enema.
Delete"Sounds like someone gave George Soros his afternoon enema."
DeleteThis would be funny, if it wasn't everything the Republican Party understands about economics.
Cope, Soros-bot.
DeleteTrump and Musk waiting until Pride month to break-up, is so on-brand for a couple of closet cases.
ReplyDeleteIn Trump's defense, he did say Musk reminded him of his daughter he always wanted to fuck.
ReplyDeleteHe has said he likes them young and lusted for his daughter on Howard Stern. This at the time mugging camera with the Epstein crew. I E. Just another sick thug.
DeleteHere is DiC's favorite economist on the Trump/Musk shitshow:
ReplyDeletehttps://m.youtube.com/watch?v=yE0SPy9B2Ag